CTE Accountability and Planning
Perkins Planning Meeting
March 2013
MSDE/DCCR
Accountability Team
Pat Mikos, Program Manager
George Comegys, CTE Specialist
Matt Koerner, CTE Specialist
Mike Beck, CTE Specialist
This Session:
CTE Accountability 101• Measures and Requirements
What’s in the CTE PQI?• Review of the Reports
• Perkins Plan Development
What’s Next?• Complete 2013 Collection/Reporting
Review of 2013-2014 CTE Data Collection and Reporting
Enrollment FilesApril 30th
Outcome FilesAug. 15th
Update List ASept. 30th
CTE Programs
(CIP & course codes)
Enrollment
(with Concentrators)
End of Year Status
(grad, dropout, tech ach)
MDCTEDATA.ORG
Perkins IV: Secondary Indicators
1. Academic Attainment: Reading/LA and Math
2. Technical Skill Attainment
3. Secondary School Completion
4. Student Graduation Rate
5. Secondary Placement
6. Non-Traditional Participation & Completion
Perkins IV: Postsecondary Indicators
1. Technical Skill Attainment
2. Credential, Certificate, or Diploma
3. Student Retention or Transfer
4. Student Placement
5. Non-Traditional Participation & Completion
CTE Concentrator:
A postsecondary/adult student who completes at least 12 academic or
CTE credits within a single program area sequence that is
comprised of 12 or more academic and technical credits and
terminates in the award of an industry-recognized credential, a
certificate, or a degree
This Session:
What’s in the PQI?• Review of the Reports
CTE Data Analysis
• Program Quality Index (PQI)• Programs by cluster – enrollment, Perkins outcomes
• Local Perkins Accountability Report (LPAR)• Shows three year trend for each measure• Negotiated Targets and the 90% rule
• Data Summary Sheets• Cluster Information – enrollment and graduates • Program Performance – highest & lowest performing
2012 PQI Data Sheet
Perkins Accountability Targets
• State Performance Levels are established by OVAE targets and previous performance
• Local Performance Levels adjusted to baseline performance based on relative performance (quartile) for each measure
• Improvement plans will be required if any of the performance measures are not met (90%)
• 2012: If 90% of target is not met for 3 consecutive years, in the same measure, subsequent action is taken. (2008 was the transition year and is not included in timelines for improvement)
EXAMPLE3P1 3P1
Retention 2013 Growth
or Transfer Target
Howard CC 2.49 3.08
Cecil CC 5.96 7.40
Harford CC 13.81 17.14
Allegany CC 16.40 19.03
Montgomery College 17.62 20.45
College of Southern MD 19.12 22.19
Chesapeake College 21.42 24.86
Frederick CC 25.06 29.08
Prince George's CC 28.84 33.47
Baltimore City CC 36.97 42.91
Hagerstown Jr. 37.95 44.04
Garrett CC 39.31 42.46
Anne Arundel CC 42.27 45.66
CCBC 50.03 54.05
Wor-Wic CC 54.71 59.10
2012 State 30.16 20132013 Target *35.00 % Growth 0.1605
Setting and Negotiating Local Targets
Rate of Growth is 16%
Rate of Growth is
1.5 x 16% = 24%
Rate of Growth is
0.5 x 16% = 8%
Rate of Growth is set by the State Target, set by OVAE
Negotiation of Local Targets
Target is met – Yeh!
Any reason 2012 would not be met?
• TSA – expanding testing areas…
• Eliminating / Adding programs
2011 Target not met – give explanation
• new assessment process
• data collection limitation
• other…
2007 2008 2009 2009 2010Sub Measurement Performance Performance 2009 Performance Local Local
Indicator Definition Percentage Percentage Data Percentage Target Target
Numerator:1S1 # of CTE Concentrators 337
Academic meeting standards on 57.14 62.34 81.60 68.57 83.64Attainment HSA English II 413
Denominator:# of CTE Concentrators
Numerator:1S2 # of CTE Concentrators 383
Academic meeting standards on 69.32 77.95 92.74 81.85 93.90Attainment HSA Algebra 413
Denominator:# of CTE Concentrators
Numerator:2S1 # of CTE Concentrators who 199
Technical met industry standards N/A 85.58 62.38 88.79 76.66Skill 319
Attainment Denominator:# of CTE Concentrators whotook an assessment alignedto CTE and industry standards
LOCAL PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT (LPAR)SUMMARY REPORT 2007 - 2009
SECONDARY RECIPIENTS
March May 2012 review of information, negotiation of targets…
Signature line with submission of Perkins Plan _________________
Data Summary Charts/Graphs
Distribution by Cluster - within LEA
CTE Program Performance 1S1,1S2, 2S1, 4S1
100.00
66.70
14.29
27.27 29.41
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
NAF Academy of Finance
County Avg. All CTE Building Property Maintenance
Construction Trades, Masonry Option
Construction Trades, Electrical Option
English HSA - Highest and Lowest Performing Programs, ------ Co. 2012
4%
CTE data collection/reporting challenges
– HSA Pass Rates: • Target program areas with high number of students completing “Bridge Projects”
– TSA Collection:• Increasing support for testing centers • Working with SIS to include indicators for Taking / Passing
– CTE Completer Status:• Scheduling and guidance to support completion• Working with SIS to include CTE Program Completion with USM
– Non-Traditional Program Areas:• Scheduling and guidance to support enrollment and completion
What’s Next?
Review the 2013-14 Specifications Manual for
CTE Data Collection:
• Files may be submitted as “flat file” or Excel
• Race/Ethnicity – new federal guidelines
• Record Layout – full last name and first name
Due Dates
• April 30, 2013 – SY 2011-12 secondary enrollment due
• June 15, 2013 – CTE Concentrator File Posted
• August 15, 2013 – CTE Outcome File Due
• September 30, 2013 – List A Verification (for 2013-14)
• October 30, 2013 – Postsecondary Fall Enrollment
Top Related