04/09/23 Dr Tarek Amin 1
Critical Appraisal of Published Medical Research
Dr. Tarek Tawfik
04/09/23 Dr Tarek Amin 2
Consider the research hypothesis
Consider the study design
Consider the outcome variable
Consider the predictor variables
Consider the methods of analysis
Consider the possible source of bias
Consider the interpretation of results
Consider the utility of the results
Ste
ps in
eva
luatio
n o
f a p
ub
lished
pap
er
04/09/23 Dr Tarek Amin 3
Stepwise Approach for Appraisal.Step 1. Consider the research hypothesis
Is there a clear statement of the research hypothesis?
Does the study address a question that has clinical relevance?
04/09/23 Dr Tarek Amin 4
Step 2. Consider the Study DesignIs the study design appropriate for the hypothesis?
Does the design represent an advance over prior approaches?
Does the study use an experimental or an observational design?
04/09/23 Dr Tarek Amin 5
Step 3. Consider the Outcome Variable
Is the outcome being studied relevant to clinical practice?
What criteria are used to define the presence of disease?
Is the determination of the absence or presence of disease accurate?
04/09/23 Dr Tarek Amin 6
Step 4. Consider the Predictor Variable
How many exposures or risk factors are being studied?
How is the presence or absence of exposure determined?
Is the assessment of exposure likely t be precise and accurate?
Is there an attempt to quantify the amount or duration of exposure?
Are biological markers of exposure used in the study?
04/09/23 Dr Tarek Amin 7
Step 5. Consider the Methods of Analysis
Are the statistical methods employed suitable for the types of the variables (nominal versus, ordinal versus continuous) in the study?
Have the levels of type I and type II errors has been discussed appropriately?
Is the sample size adequate to answer the research question?
Have the assumptions underlying the statistical tests been met?
Has chance been evaluated as a potential explanation of the results?
04/09/23 Dr Tarek Amin 8
Step 6. Consider Possible source of Bias (Systematic Error)
Is the method of selection of subjects likely to have biased results?
Is the measurement of either the exposure or the disease likely to be biased?
Have the investigators considered whether confounders could account for the observed results?
In what direction would each potential bias influence the results?
04/09/23 Dr Tarek Amin 9
Step 7. Consider the interpretation of the results.
How large is the observed effect?
Is there evidence of a dose-response relationship?
Are the findings consistent with laboratory models?
Are the effect are biologically plausible?
If the findings are negative, was there sufficient statistical power to detect an effect?
04/09/23 Dr Tarek Amin 10
Step 8. Consider how the results of the study can be used in practice.
Are the findings consistent with other studies of the same questions?
Can the findings be generalized to other human populations?
Do the findings warrant a change in current clinical practice?
04/09/23 Dr Tarek Amin 11
Questions and Comments
Top Related