Collaborative and Distributed Product Configuration: An Agent-Based Approach
Carlos Roberto Marques [email protected]
Elder José Reioli [email protected]
Motivation
• The paradigm of software development based on Software Product Line (SPL) has emerged as an interesting approach to software factories.
• Several benefits are achieved with the use of LPS.
– Reduction in development cost;
– Increase Quality;
– Reduced Time-to-Market;
– Reduction in maintenance effort;
– Better cost estimation;
– among others….
Motivation
• Feature Modeling
– Compact representation of all the products of an SPL in terms of features;
– describes the configuration space of a system family;
– Widely used to SPL representation.
Motivation
Problems with Product Configuration
• As long as the problem domain gets bigger, the feature model becomes more complex.
• Product configuration might require the participations of many stakeholders, each one with his expertise.
• Unfortunately, current configuration technology is essentially single-user-based and translated in configuration decisions by the product manager.
10/04/23 5Nome do Autor © LES/PUC-Rio
• No pre-processing to synchronize the participation of stakeholders.
• The process of configuration is dynamic.
• The approach is agent-based.
• The approach transfers the responsibility of reasoning about the constraints, the communication and the conflict resolution to the agents.
• The agents are able to produce suggestions to make the configuration valid (in relation to the constraints of the feature model), in case some constraint was violated.
10/04/23 6Nome do Autor © LES/PUC-Rio
Collaborative and Distributed Product Configuration
Model
Model
Model
UA
UA
UA
PCMA
Instance 1
Instance n
Instance 2
GUI
GUI
GUIModel
GUI
Libertas: Approach Overview
Libertas: Architecture Overview
Libertas: Graphical User Interface
10/04/23 9Nome do Autor © LES/PUC-Rio
Feature Model -> Constraint Satisfaction Problem
C
S
A
S
S
S
f1
f2
f3
f4
f4
Variables: vf1, vf2, vf3, vf4 e vf5
vf1, vf2, vf3, vf4 e vf5 E {0,1}
Dependency Constraints: vf4 vf5
Hierarchical Constraints:
vf3 vf2
vf4 vf2
Feature Model Constraints: vf2 vf3 ^ vf4
f4 f5
Feature Model -> Constraint Satisfaction Problem
Proposal
• Code improvements;
• Extend the feature model representation;
• Optimal configuration recommendation;
– Agents reason on the feature model constraints and suggest the best configuration
• Documentation
10/04/23 12Nome do Autor © LES/PUC-Rio
References
• Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S. & Eisenecker, U. (2004b), Staged configuration using feature models, in R. L. Nord, ed., ‘Proceedings of the Third Software Product-Line Conference (SPLC 2004), Boston, MA, USA, August/September 2004’, Vol. 3154 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag.
• K. Czarnecki, S. Helsen, and U. Eisenecker. Staged configuration through specialization and multi-level configuration of feature models. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 10(2):143–169, 2005.
• M. Mendonca, D. D. Cowan, T. Oliveira, A Process-Centric Approach for Coordinating Product Configuration Decisions, HICSS, p. 283a, 2007.
• Mendonca, M., Oliveira, T., Cowan, D.D.: Collaborative Product Configuration in Software Product Lines – Formalization and Dependency Analysis, Journal of Software, ISSN 1796-217X, vol. 3, issue 2, pp. 69-82, February 2008.
Collaborative and Distributed Product Configuration: An Agent-Based Approach
Carlos Roberto Marques [email protected]
Elder José Reioli [email protected]
Top Related