Characterization of Bacterial isolates from Kashmir cave,
Pakistan, and their Potential Applications.
By
Sahib Zada
Department of Microbiology
Quaid-i-Azam University
Islamabad, Pakistan
2017
Characterization of Bacterial isolates from Kashmir cave,
Pakistan, and their Potential Applications.
A thesis
Submitted in the Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
IN
MICROBIOLOGY
By
Sahib Zada
Department of Microbiology
Quaid-i-Azam University
Islamabad, Pakistan
2017
DECLARATION
The material contained in this thesis is my original work and I have not presented any
part of this thesis/work elsewhere for any other degree.
Sahib Zada
DEDICATED
TO
My Ammi, Abbu and
Late Talha khan
CONTENTS
S. No. Title Page No.
1. List of Abbreviations i
2. List of Tables ii
3. List of Figures iii
4. Acknowledgements vi
5. Summary viii
6. Chapter 1: Introduction 1
7. Chapter 2: Review of Literature 18
8. Chapter 3: Paper 1 60
Paper 2 99
Paper 3 124
Paper 4 147
9. Chapter 5: Mn oxidation by Cavernicoles
a. Abstract 170
b. Introduction 171
c. Methodology 180
d. Results 185
e. Discussion 201
f. References 204
10. Conclusions 206
11. Future Prospects 207
List of Abbreviations
A Adenosine
ATP Adenosine-5’-triphosphate
BLAST Basic Local Alignment Search Tool
BLASTX BLAST search using a translated nucleotide query
°C Degree celsius
Ca Calcium
DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid
e.g. Exempli gratia, for example
et al. et alii/alia, and others
Fe Iron
Fig. Figure
FTIR Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy
HEPES N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-2-ethanesulfonic acid
LBB Leucoberbelin Blue
LDPE Low density polyethylene
MCO Multi Copper Oxidase
MEGAN 5 MEtaGenome ANalyzer
Mn Manganese
MOB Manganese Oxidizing Bacteria
NaCl Sodium Chloride
NCBI National Center for Biotechnology Information
OD Optical Density
PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction
pH Power of Hydrogen
RDP Ribosomal Database Project
rRNA Ribosomal ribonucleic acid
SEM Scanning Electron Microscopy
SOD Superoxide Dismutase
TBE Tris base, boric acid EDTA
UV-Vis Ultra Violet Visible
VOC Volatile Organic Compounds
X-RD X-ray Powder Diffraction
Zn Zinc
List of Tables
No. Title Page No.
1 List of largest and most studied caves world wide 9
2 List of caves in Pakistan 10
3 Cave microbes isolated from different caves in different country
through out the world
13
4 Different caves are studied for microbial diversity in different
countries
37
5 List of minerals obtained from smast-5 floor and smast-7 wall of
Kashmir smast samples
72
6 Concentration of elements in sample collected from cave floor and
outside cave soil (control)
72
7 Viable Cell Count of bacterial consortium in different media
compositions incubated at 37°C.
109
8 Mn(II) oxidizing Bacteria Isolated from Kashmir cave soil and
speleothem.
186
List of Figure
S.No. Title
Page
No.
1 Different types of caves and its formation including dissolution and
weathering.
4
2 Solutional cave formation 5
3 Limestone cave formation 5
4 Distribution of major groups of microbial communities in cave
environments by 16S rRNA gene sequencing
12
5 The process of calcium carbonate precipitation by bacteria 30
6 Bacteria serving as nucleation site for CaCO3 precipitation in the
sand particle
31
7 Distribution of major groups of microbial communities in cave
environments by 16S rRNA gene sequencing
36
8 Kashmir cave (smast), Nanseer Buner, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,
Pakistan. White arrows show location of the cave, black arrow
shows entrance to the cave.
65
105
9 XRD patterns of Kashmir smast (a) from the floor and (b) from the
wall along-with the matched peaks of the mineral ICSD (Inorganic
Crystal Structure Database)
71
10 Quantitative analysis of minerals, A. Wall soil sample smast-7, B.
Floor soil sample smast-5
73
11 Infrared spectra of Smast-7 wall 73
12 TGA (Thermogravimetric Analysis) plots of Kashmir smast
(sample-5 Floor and sample-7 wall)
74
13 FE-SEM micrograph & EDS spectra of (a) smast-7 wall and (b)
smast-5 floor
75
14 Nutrient agar plate showing the zones of inhibition against the
clinical isolates
76
15 Phylogenetic tree of all four species with related sequences in NCBI 77-78
16 Effect of time of incubation, pH and temperature on the growth and
antimicrobial activity of B. licheniformis KC2-MRL against M.
luteus, S. aureus, Klebsiella and E. coli
79
17 Zone of inhibition of our four antibiotic producing strains (Serratia
sp. KC1-MRL, Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL, Bacillus sp. KC3-
MRL and Stenotrophomonas sp. KC4-MRL) against selected
antibiotics in mm.
80
18 Comparison of FTIR spectra of control (Bacitracin) and the
antibacterial compound produced by B. licheniformis KC2-MRL
81
19 Fourier-transform infrared spectra from control and different media
after incubation at 37°C for one month
112
20 Scanning electron microscopy of low-density polyethylene samples
under specified treatment after incubation with bacterial consortia at
37°C for one month.
114
21 Limestone cave (Kashmir Smast Pirsai Mardan, Pakistan) 126
22 Evolutionary relationships of taxa Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-
MRL.
130
23 Effect of size of inoculum on the growth of Lysinibacillus
sphaericus KC5-MRL and production of lipase.
131
24 Lipolytic, amylolytic and proteolytic activity of Lysinibacillus
sphaericus KC5-MRL at 30°C
132
25 Stability of crude extracts of lipase, amylase and protease of
Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL at different pH
134
26 Stability of crude extracts of lipase, amylase and protease of
Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL at different temperature
136
27 Effects of detergents on the lipolytic, amylolytic and proteolytic
activity of isolate Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL
137
28 Effects of metal ions on lipase, amylase and protease activity of
isolate Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL
138
29 Effects of organic solvents on lipase, amylase and protease activity
of Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL
139
30 Effect of inhibitors on lipase, amylase and protease activity of
Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL
139
31 Molecular Phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood method 154
32 Calcium precipitates induced by bacteria in crystals form A)
Paracoccus Limosus, B) Brevundimonas naejangsanensis.
155
33 Compound microscopy of precipitates produced at 25°C. 155
34 Compound microscopy of precipitates produced at pH 5. 156
35 Compound microscopy of precipitates produced after 20 days of
incubation.
156
36 Electron microscopy at different wavelength (A) at 500 μm, (B) at
200 μm, (C) at 100 μm, (D) 50 μm, (E) 1 micro meter.
157
37 FTIR analysis of CaCO3 with control. 158
38 XRD analysis of the polymorphs of Calcium carbonate. 165
39 Mn cycle of oxidation states found in nature 175
40 Four possible mechanisms of Mn+2 oxidation by bacteria. 176
41 Enzymatic pathway of Mn(II) oxidation 177
42 Kashmir Smast (Cave) entrance zone 180
43 Speleothems isolated from Kashmir smast (Cave) 181
44 Initial screening of Mn(II) oxidizing bacterial strains from cave soil. 187
45 Stereoscopy of the isolates. 188
46 DNA bands of Mn(II) oxidizing isolates 188
47 Phylogenetic anaylsis by Maximum Likelihood method 189
48 Growth curves of Bacillus pumilus C3 at 30oC and 25oC (No
Mn600, 30oC and No Mn600, 25oC), in the presence of MnCl2
(Mn600, 30oC), after adding 1 and M of Super Oxides Dismutase
(SOD) (Mn+SOD1,600. Mn+SOD5,600), and in the presence of
100M Calcium acetate (Mn+Ca, 600)
190
49 Growth curves of Bacillus Safensis C6 at 30oC and 25oC (No
Mn600, 30oC and No Mn600, 25oC), in the presence of MnCl2
(Mn600, 30oC), after adding 1 and M of Super Oxides Dismutase
(SOD) (Mn+SOD1,600. Mn+SOD5,600), and in the presence of
100M Calcium acetate (Mn+Ca, 600).
191
50 Growth curves of Bacillus pumilus C7 at 30oC and 25oC (No
Mn600, 30oC and No Mn600, 25oC), in the presence of MnCl2
(Mn600, 30oC), after adding 1 and M of Super Oxides Dismutase
192
(SOD) (Mn+SOD1,600. Mn+SOD5,600), and in the presence of
100M Calcium acetate (Mn+Ca, 600).
51 Growth curves of Bacillus cereus C8 at 30oC and 25oC (No Mn600,
30oC and No Mn600, 25oC), in the presence of MnCl2 (Mn600,
30oC), after adding 1 and M of Super Oxides Dismutase (SOD)
(Mn+SOD1,600. Mn+SOD5,600), and in the presence of 100M
Calcium acetate (Mn+Ca, 600).
193
52 Growth curves of Bacillus acidiceler C11 at 30oC and 25oC (No
Mn600, 30oC and No Mn600, 25oC), in the presence of MnCl2
(Mn600, 30oC), after adding 1 and M of Super Oxides Dismutase
(SOD) (Mn+SOD1,600. Mn+SOD5,600), and in the presence of
100M Calcium acetate (Mn+Ca, 600).
194
53 Variation in Mn(II) oxidation at different pH and Ca+2 ion
concentration.
195
54 Mn(II) oxidation capacity and Mn(III, IV) oxide concentration as a
function of reaction time in C rich media K-medium. The ages of the
Mn oxide are from 4 h to 36 h.
196
197
198
199
55 Effect of metals on Mn oxide production by cavernicoles after 24 h
of incubation.
200
Acknowledgements
Praise to ALMIGHTY ALLAH, whose blessings enabled me to achieve my goals.
Tremendous praise for the Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Peace Be upon Him),
who is forever a torch of guidance for the knowledge seekers and humanity as a whole.
I have great reverence and admiration for my research supervisor, Dr. Fariha Hasan,
Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan, for her
scholastic guidance, continuous encouragement, sincere criticism and moral support
throughout the study. Her guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing
of this thesis, with her patience and immense knowledge.
I do not find enough words to express my heartfelt gratitude for Dr. Yuanzhi Tang,
Professor in Department of Earth Science and Technology, Georgia Institute of
Technology, Atlanta Georgia,USA. She supervised me during my studies in Georgia
Tech University during IRSIP. This experience would not have been as valuable without
the guidance, support and inspiration provided by her. I am impressed by her scientific
thinking and politeness.
I am also thankful to Alex, Sheliang, and Emily Saad Postdoctoral Research Associates
at Atmospheric Science and Technology Department, for their care and immense help
during my entire stay at Georgia Tech.
I would also like to thank Higher Education Commission, Pakistan, for providing me
grant under the Project “International Research Support Initiative Program (IRSIP)”.
I am extremely grateful to the entire faculty at the Department of Microbiology, Quaid-
i-Azam University, Islamabad. Many thanks to Dr. Frank Stewart and Josh at Georgia
Tech for their kind help at Stewart lab.
Extremely thankful to Dr. Muhammad Rafiq for his help during whole study.
I extend my great depth of loving thanks to all my friends and lab mates (seniors and
juniors) especially Imran Khan, Irfan Khan, Wasim Sajjad, Abdul Haleem, Arshad,
Abdul Haq, Ghufran, Matiullah, Wasim (Bhatti), Waqas, Hameed Wazir, Dr. Akram,
Dr. Malik, Amir Nawab(Ustaz Sb), Shakir, M. Aziz, Amin, Asim, Adnan, Saeedullah
Jan, Afzal, Rafiqullah Umair, Akhtar Nadhman, Barkat, Faiz, Sana, Maliha, Khansa,
Nazia, Naosheen, Aiman and Hifsa Saleema for their help throughout my study.
I would like to thank my class fellows Sanaullah, Sultan, Rashid, Sohail, Pervaiz Ali,
Aziz Khan, Ahmad Sadiq Hasan and Tariq for their help and support. A special thanks
to my sweet USA memories makers Waqas Waheed, Amir Shafiq, Abdullah, Nauroz,
Etizaz, Sherjeel Ahmad Usman,Usama(Abubakar) Ismail Khan, and Danial (PSA
Sadar).
A non-payable debt to my loving Ammi, Abbu, brothers and sisters for bearing all the
ups and downs of my research, motivating me for higher studies, sharing my burden
and making sure that I sailed through smoothly. Completion of this work would not
have been possible without the unconditional support and encouragement of my loving
family members. I would like to acknowledge my uncle Fazal Dad and Amir Nawab
Khan for their moral and financial support.
Finally, I express my gratitude and apology to all those who provided me the
opportunity to achieve my endeavors but I missed to mention them personally.
Sahib Zada
Characterization of Bacterial isolates from Kashmir cave, Pakistan,
and their Potential Applications.
PhD thesis by
Sahib Zada
Department of Microbiology,
Faculty of Biological Sciences,
Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad
2017
Summary
Cave is a natural origin large underground enclosed place mostly in a hillside or inside
the sea. Complete darkness inside the cave environment. Caves are of two types, sea
caves and ground caves. Sea caves are generally short in length about 5 to 50 meters
may exceed 300 meters. Due to low pressure and low oxygen concentration inside cave
environment breathing is high. In large cave systems the air exchange is so high that air
speed is about 80 miles per hour due to that, atmospheric gases are present inside cave,
while ground caves are many miles in length.
Humans used caves for different purposes in early era for temporary shelter, for the
celebration of rituals of passage, buried their wealth, source of different minerals,
paleolithic painting, treasure hunting and as a historical landmark. Cave hosts diverse
microbial and eukaryotic communities which have a very rich ecology. Pakistan has
many caves which are still unexplored biospeleologically. The largest cave of Pakistan
is Pir Ghaib Gharr cave in Baluchistan. In current study samples were collected
aseptically from Kashmir smast Mardan/Buner. Samples were transported into
Microbiology Research Lab, Quaid i Azam University Islamabad for further analysis.
The geochemical analysis of the samples was carried out to determine the mineralogical
composition of the samples. Bacterial strains were isolated by culture depended method
using different media in laboratory. Different strains were selected on the basis of
colony morphology. The isolated strains were further characterized and analyzed for
different applications. The geochemical analysis is explained paper wise. A total 34
bacterial strain were isolated from samples collected from samples of Kashmir Cave on
the basis of colony morphology. These isolates were further studied for their potential
applications summarized in following.
Geochemical analysis and production of antibiotic: Bacterial strains having the
ability to inhibit the growth of other bacteria were isolated from soil samples collected
from Kashmir Smast (smast is Pushto for cave), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The
study includes mineralogical and geochemical analyses of soil sample collected from
the cave, so as to describe the habitat from which the microorganisms have been
isolated. Total bacterial count of the soil sample was 5.25104 CFU mL−1. Four
bacterial isolates having activity against test organisms Micrococcus luteus, Klebsiella
sp., Pseudomonas sp., and Staphylococcus aureus were screened out for further study.
Two of the isolates were found to be Gram-positive and the other two Gram-negative.
The four isolates showing antibacterial activity were identified as Serratia sp. KC1-
MRL, Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL, Bacillus sp. KC3-MRL, and
Stenotrophomonas sp. KC4-MRL on the basis of 16S rRNA sequence analysis.
Although all isolates showed antibacterial activity, only Bacillus licheniformis KC2-
MRL was selected for further study due to its large zone of inhibition. Anti‐ bacterial
activity of B. licheniformis KC2-MRL was optimum when grown in nutrient broth
adjusted to pH 5 and after 24 hours of incubation at 35oC. The extracted antibacterial
compound was stable at pH 5–7 and 40oC when incubated for 1 hour. The strain was
found resistant against cefotaxime (ctx). Atomic-absorption analysis of the soil sample
collected from the cave showed high concentrations of calcium (332.938 mg kg−1) and
magnesium (1.2576 mg kg−1) compared to the control soil collected outside the cave.
FTIR spectrum of the concentrated protein showed similarity to bacitracin. The
antibacterial compound showed activity against both Gram-negative and positive test
strains. Mineralogy of Kashmir Smast is diverse and noteworthy. Different
geochemical classes identified by X-ray diffraction were nitrates, oxides, phosphates,
silicates, and sulfates. Weathered cave limestone contributes notably to the formation
of these minerals or compounds. FTIR spectroscopic analysis helped to identify
minerals such as quartz, clinochlore, vermiculite, illite, calcite, and biotite.
Biodegradation of polyethylene: Low density polyethylene (LDPE) is used for
making common shopping bags and plastic sheets and is a significant source of
environmental pollution. The present study was aimed at testing the ability of bacterial
strains identified as Serratia sp. KC1-MRL, Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL, Bacillus
sp. KC3-MRL and Stenotrophomonas sp. KC4-MRL isolated from a limestone cave to
degrade polyethylene. These strains were isolated from soil of Kashmir Smast, a
limestone cave in Buner, Pakistan. These strains showed antibacterial activity against
Micrococcus luteus, Klebsiella sp., Pseudomonas sp., and Staphylococcus aureus. The
pieces of LDPE plastic were incubated along with bacterial strains for a period of one
month and then analyzed. Degradation was observed in terms of growth of
microorganisms used in consortia, chemical changes in the composition of LDPE by
fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and changes in physical structure of LDPE by
scanning electron microscopy. Maximum growth (107×105 CFU/ml) at 28°C and
subsequent change in chemical and physical properties of plastic were observed in the
presence of calcium and glucose. The cave-soil sample had a very high concentration
of calcium. The microscopy showed adherence of bacteria with lots of mechanical
damage and erosion on the surface of plastic films incubated with bacterial consortia.
The spectroscopy showed breakdown and formation of many compounds, as evident
by the appearance and disappearance of peaks in LDPE treated with bacterial consortia
as compared to the untreated control. We conclude that antibiotic-producing cave
bacteria were able to bring about physical and chemical changes in LDPE pieces and
degradation of LDPE was enhanced in media augmented with calcium.
Bio-mineralization of CaCO3: Cave bacterial strains make significant contribution in
the precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). In this section of study, it is shown that
the CaCO3 precipitation is due to result of microbial metabolic activities. The isolated
strains were used observe the CaCO3 precipitation by using B4 medium. A total of three
bacterial strains showed the capability of CaCO3 precipitation on the selected medium.
Bacterial cells with mineralization potential were molecularly identified through 16S
rRNA gene sequencing as Bacillus toyonensis, Paracoccus Limosus and
Brevundimonas diminuta. The most precipitates were observed at temperature and pH
of 25oC and 5. The precipitated CaCO3 was further confirmed by Scanning Electron
Microscopy (SEM), X-ray powder diffraction (X-RD), and Fourier Transform Infra
Red spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis.
Potential of enzymes production: All isolates were screened for different enzymes
and isolate KC5- MRL was found to produce three industrially important enzymes;
lipase, protease and amylase. The bacterial isolate was identified as Lysinibacillus
sphaericus KC5-MRL (Accession No. KF010827). Optimum pH for the growth of
Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5- MRL, was around 7 and grew best at 35ºC. The
optimum activity of lipase was observed at 30°C after 24 hr of incubation and pH 5
(42.23 U/ml). Maximum lypolytic activity (181.93 U/ml) was observed when 8%
inoculum was used. Amylolytic activity of Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL was
optimum (15 U/ml) after 24 hr of incubation at 30°C. Proteolytic activity of L.
sphaericus KC5-MRL was found to be 59 U/ml, after 48 hr at 30°C. Highest stability
(42%) of lipase was observed at pH 10. pH stability of amylase showed highest activity
at pH 7 i.e. 99.4%, whereas, protease stability was highest at pH 8. L. sphaericus KC5-
MRL lipase, protease and amylase were stable at 35ºC and with residual activity as
118%, 104% and 107%, respectively. Triton X-100 and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
stimulated the lipase and protease activities, whereas, Triton X-100 and T-80 stimulated
amylolytic activity. Mg++, NH4+ and Ca++ stimulated the lipase activity and Zn++
showed highest inhibitory effect on lipase activity. Hg+, Mg++, Zn++ and NH4+ reduced
amylase activity, whereas, Na+ and Ca++ showed stimulatory effect. Hg+, Zn++, Ca++
and NH4+
reduced protease activity but Na+ and Mg+ stimulated protease activity.
Chloroform, formaldehyde, methanol and benzene stimulated amylase activity.
Nitobenzen, methanol, benzene, and acetone stimulated protease activity.
Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) showed stimulatory effect on lipase. EDTA,
Trisodium citrate TSC, mercaptoethanol, Phenyl acetaldehyde (PAA) and PMSF
reduced amylase activity. All the modulators reduced protease activity except TSC and
PMSF which stimulated its activity. The study concludes that these enzymes can be
used for different purposes in various industries such as food and detergent.
Studies for Mn Oxidation by Cave Microbes: Mn (II) oxides are present abundantly
in every environment, and very active in biogeochemical cycle of nutrients, carbon,
contaminants, and other elements. It believes that bacteria play a key role in Mn oxides
precipitation in environment. Manganese oxidizing bacteria (MOB) are reported mostly
from marine or other aquatic environment, and few from terrestrial. The current
knowledge is on the precipitation of Mn oxides by five Kashmir cave bacterial isolates
B. pumilus C3, B. safensis C6, B. pumilus C7, B.cereus C8, and B. acidiceler C11.
These Mn(II) oxidizing bacterial strains were isolated and purified on carbon rich K-
medium. The Mn(II) oxidation by these isolated bacterial strains was enzymatically
controlled reaction. The activity of Mn(II) oxidation was optimum at pH 5-7 and a
temperature of 25-30oC and was lost at high temperature. Calcium ion (Ca+2)
concentration affected the Mn(II) oxidation dramatically, while the Zn and Cu ions had
no such high effect on the growth and Mn(II) oxidation. This demonstrates that cave
bacteria are involved in the production of biogenic manganese oxides in cave
environment.
Introduction
Cave is a natural large underground enclosed place mostly in a hillside or inside the
sea. Complete darkness inside the cave environment. Caves are of two types, sea caves
and ground caves. Sea caves are generally short in length about 5 to 50 meters may
exceed 300 meters (Burcham, 2009). Due to low pressure and low oxygen
concentration inside cave environment breathing is high. In large cave systems the air
exchange is so high that air speed is about 80 miles per hour due to that, atmospheric
gases are present inside cave, while ground caves are many miles in length (Barton et
al., 2007).
Cave study started in 17th century but later, before the mid of nineteenth century, the
research value of cave environment focused its contribution to many other studies of
science including geology, archaeology, chemistry, biology and geography. Visit to
cave environment is difficult due to darkness, dangerous and no pre-indications (Crane
and Fletcher, 2015). The cave ecosystem have constant temperature, high humidity and
low nutrient availability with slightly acidic pH (Biswas, 2010). The internal maximum
temperature of cave may rise to 10oC while the humidity is almost 100%. The scientists
were of the opinion that caves have no life due to darkness, limited nutrients, acidic
condition and presence of H2S in air, later it was observed that they were not right
(Engle et al. 2008).
The scientific study of cave is known as speleology and biospeleology is the study of
life in cave (Moore and Nicholas, 1967). The study of caves covers the cave features,
make-up, structure, history, life forms and its formation. The process by which the
caves are form is called speleogenesis. Speleology is interconnected study with
chemistry, biology, geology, physics, meteorology and cartography. A French scientist
named Edouard-Alfred Martel (1859-1938) was the first who studied the modern
speleology who is considerd the father of modern speleology. He was the founder of an
association called Societe de Speleologie founded in 1895 the first ever association for
cave study. The advancement of cave study is linked with caving sport because of
taking interest by public and awareness, mostly spelelological field works are
conducted by sport cavers.
Cave study is known with different names in different countries like spelunking in USA
and Canada and in some areas cave study is called potholing (Engle et al. 2008).
Humans used caves for different purposes in early era for temporary shelter, for the
celebration of rituals of passage, buried their wealth, source of different minerals,
paleolithic painting, treasure hunting and as a historical landmark (Hayden and
Villenueve, 2011).
Types of caves
On the basis of cave formation and rock type, caves have been classified into several
types. The most common types of caves are formed in limestone rocks (calcareous),
and in basaltic rocks (lava tubes). Other cave types are limited in range and include
those in quartzite, granite, ice, talus, gypsum and sandstone (Palmer, 1991).
The two general types of caves (terrestrial and underwater) are shaped by the
dissolution and characterized as limestone caves. Limestone caves are shaped due to
the rock dissolution in weak acids, which exist naturally in ground water. Weak acid is
used to solubilize these rocks just like sugar in tea, but dissolves steadily and slowly.
Cracks are formed as a result of ground water which then increases in size and form a
full cave.
These caves may overflow with water when groundwater increases in a level higher
than a cave. In some cases, the whole cave or some part of it fills with water (Barton
and Jurado, 2007).
Solutional cave: Solutional caves are formed in soluble rocks like limestone, chalk,
dolomite, salt beds, marble or gypsum. This type of cave is mostly formed in terrestrial
environment. The largest cave in the world is solutional cave. The soluble rocks
dissolve by the action of rain and ground water charged with carbonic acid (H2CO3)
and natural organic acid present in environment. Solutional caves are adorned with
CaCO3 formed via precipitation, which contain stalactites, stalagmites, flowstones,
helictites, soda straws and columns. Speleothems are the secondary minerals deposited
in solutional caves, whereas the sulfurous fumes formed by the reaction of H2S gas and
oil reservoirs results in the formation of secondary types of solutional caves. The H2S
gas react with water and form sulfuric acid (H2SO4) which dissolves the rocks and as a
result the solutional cave is formed (Burcham, 2009).
Ice cave: Any cave which have significant amount of perennial ice inside cave and
have at least a portion at temperature less than 0oC throughout the year. An Englishman,
Edwin Swift Balch in 1900, described for the first time an ice cave and suggested the
word “glacier” for this type of cave. Now the term “ice cave” is commonly used for the
cave containing year-round ice. Cave formed in ice is properly called glacier cave. The
surface of the rocks is thermally insulated due to which the surface temperature is nearly
constant (Ford and William, 1989).
Lava cave (Lava tube cave): The formation of lava tube cave mechanism is not clearly
understood. The discovery of lava tube is one of the major mechanisms of building
shield volcanoes by separating the flowing lava and dispensing it away from the vent
(Swanson et al., 1971). The strong indirect evidences of huge lava tubes are thought to
be present on moon (Greeley, 1971) have given the importance to understand the
phenomenon of the formation of lava tube. Different theories exist about the lava tube
formation. Ollier and Brown (1965) suggested that lava tubes require laminar flow of
the lava. Lava tubes are mostly formed in basaltic lava flows. The basaltic lava deposits
differ in viscosity, heat and gas contents. As the flow become cooler, the gas evaporates,
slow in motion, and more viscous than pahoehoe flows. This flow cracks the crust into
huge pieces of clinker which are pushed and buried by the flow. This type of flow forms
cave, the clinker may offer routes for microbes to cave. Lava tube cave range in size
from tiny, finger size tunnels to cave having length more than 6000 m and diameter of
17 m (Howarth, 1973).
Sea cave: This type of cave is also called littoral cave, and is formed by wave action in
zones of weakness in sea cliffs. Sea caves are present everywhere in the world. Coasts
of Norway are rich of sea caves mostly 100 feet above sea level (Rabbe, 1988). The
largest sea caves were discovered in the west coast of United State, the Hawaiian Island
and Shetland Islands; while the world’s largest one is Matainaka cave having a length
of 1.5 km located at Otago coast, New Zealand (Barth, 2013).
Sea caves are formed in sea side rocks i.e. sedimentary, metamorphic and igneous,
having a weak zone. Sea Caves are formed by mechanical erosion produced by wave
actions which break the rocks. Some caves are formed in carbonate rocks in littoral
zones and expand by littoral process but its origin is by dissolution which are called
hybrid caves (Mylroie and Mylroie, 2013). Rain water, carbonic and organic acid
leached from soil also play key role in cave formation by weakening the rocks.
Cave genesis
The process of cave formation is called speleogenesis and the caves are formed by
different geological processes like combination of different chemical reactions,
dissolution, mechanical weathering, melting of ice or glacier, corrosion by water,
tectonic forces, microorganisms, pressure, atmospheric influences and also by
excavating (Engel et al., 2004). Dissolutional caves are formed by water flowing on
and through limestone rocks which can be formed from epigenic (top-down process) or
hypogenic (bottom-up process). Caves formed in basalt or sandstone rocks are
categorized as pseudokarst (Palmer, 2007). Erosional caves are formed by mechanical
scouring or wave action rather than by dissolution. Dissolution caves can transit to
erosion caves with the passage of time. Sea caves develop by erosion along sea cliffs
and anchialine caves form by dissolution along sides. Lava tube caves are different than
dissolution caves which are formed from cooled crust around the flowing lava.
Fig. 1.1. Different types of caves and its formation including dissolution and
weathering (White and Culver, 2000).
Fig. 1.2. Solutional cave formation (Cooper et al., 2007).
Fig. 1.3. Limestone cave formation (Williams, 2016).
Traditionally, cave genesis is mostly from dissolution of minerals by water. Rock
solubilization is a fundamental process in cave formation but not adequate geological
prerequisite for cave development. The potency and velocity of mineral dissolution by
water depend on climatic parameters e.g. speleogenesis is faster in humid and warm
conditions (Priesnitz, 1974). The solubilization process is mineral specific i.e. in
limestone cave the carbonate (calcite and aragonite), and dolomite [CaMg(CO3)2] are
the most soluble minerals.
Role of cave microbes in minerals deposition
The role of microbes in the decomposition of minerals is directly or indirectly and
utilize these decompose minerals for their growth. In acidic condition microbial
dissolution of sulfide minerals produce more than 1,000 times Acid Rock Drainage than
chemical reaction alone. These microbes take part in minerals precipitation, adsorption
or metals release, and decomposition/formation of organic-metallic compounds. Cave
microbes use soluble minerals as oxidizing agent, electron acceptors/donors in redox
reactions, and involved in metabolism (Adams, 2005).
In cave pyrite (FeS2) is oxidized by ferric iron or oxygen and microbes can enhance the
rate of pyrite oxidation. Williamson et al, (1994) derived a law which state that abiotic
oxidation of pyrite in enhance by increasing the concentration of oxygen and slightly
by decreasing pH. The oxidation of pyrite by microbes begins to exceed at about pH
3.5 – 4. The Oxidation of pyrite of microbial origin by ferric iron is many times faster
than abiotic oxidation by oxygen at pH 2 (Nordstorm and Alpers, 1999). The
temperature also plays an important role in biotic and abiotic rate of oxidation. The
acids are produce only in the presence of iron fraction. Other minerals like gypsum and
carbonate present in the site also contribute in weathering of rock pile stability or
instability.
Acid formation is a result of oxidation of pyrite which contains iron and sulfur. The
following reaction illustrates the reaction of pyrite (solid) and oxygenated water.
FeS2 + 3.5O2 + H2O Fe2+ + 2SO42- + 2H+
According to this mechanism the formation of reduced iron and acid takes place. This
environment (Reduced iron and presence of Oxygen) favor the growth of acidophilic,
autotrophic microbes (Iron and Sulfur oxidizers) A number of iron and sulfur oxidizer
bacteria are reported from caves which include Acidithiobacillus species are very
common known as Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Leptospirillum ferrooxidans and
sulfolobus acidocaldarius and some colorless sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (Ehrlich, et al,
1991).
These microbes play a key role in biogeochemical cycles and minerals leaching, the
bacterium T. ferrooxidans is a model bacterium for iron oxidation studies (Johnson, et
al, 1993). The mechanism of acid production is believed that iron oxidizers (T.
ferrooxidans) catalyze by oxidizing iron (Fe+2) to ferric iron (Fe+3) which act as oxidant
of pyrite, and create more reduced iron, sulfate and acid in huge amount as describe in
below reaction (Evangelou and Zhang, 1995).
4Fe2+
+ O2 + 4H+ → 4Fe3+
+ 2H2O
FeS2 + 14Fe
3+ + 8H
2O → 15Fe
2+ + 2SO
4 2- + 16H
+
In biologically acid production the Fe2+ act as rate limiting factor during these processes
(Singer and Stumm, 1970). There is also a completion for oxygen and other nutrients
among iron oxidizers bacteria including T. ferrooxidans and other microbes of the
habitat.
Reports supported the idea that the genera i.e. Thiobacillus, Leptospirillum, Sulfolobus
and some color colorless sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, with Thiobacillus sp. are involved
in the oxidation of sulfide into sulfur (Ehrlich et al,, 1991; Wichlacz and Unz, 1981;
Harrison, 1984). The rate limiting step is mediated by the enzyme sulfate oxidase
(enzyme cofactors are Mo and Fe).
CO2 +2H
2S → CH
2O+2S+H
2O
2CO2 + H
2S + 2H
2O → 2(CH
2O) + H
2SO
4
Oxidation of Sulfur and Related Compounds
2S+3O2+2H-OH → 2H
2SO
4
(Thiobacillus thiooxidans)
12FeSO4+3O
2+6H-OH → 4Fe
2(SO
4)3+4Fe(OH)
3
(T. ferrooxidans)
Microbes oxidized sulfur at a variety of pH 8.5 to 1.9, lower pH favor the oxidation of
sulfur by different microbes, once the pH is lower by the production of sulfate by some
microorganisms this may involve in the activation of other group of microbes and take
part in the oxidation. Therefore succession of microbes takes place as the pH of soil is
lowered by the production of sulfate (Ehrlich, et al. 1991, Harrison, 1984). The acid
production from the oxidation of pyrite by microbes also increases the dissolution of
minerals present in cave. The lithological studies of cave rocks revealed that cave rocks
compose of carbonate minerals (calcite) and silicate minerals (plagioclase, K-feldspar,
hornblende, biotite, augite). Microbes used the oxidized metal as electron acceptors
during autotrophic processes these metal may include arsenic, cadmium, calcium,
copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphate, potassium, selenium, sulfur, uranium,
and zinc.
Different studies can be merged to find out the effect of microbes on rocks weathering
and possible role in mineralization. The study of cave rock and cave microbiology
should also helpful in strategies of increase rock stability and decreasing or increasing
water penetration into the rock.
Caves of the world
Caves hides the beauty and splendor of nature like the depths of ocean. Caves are
present mostly in mountain or under the earth. Caves are located everywhere in the
world. The largest cave system in the world is Mammoth cave located in Kentucky,
USA. According to the National Speleological Society (NSS) survey in January 2016,
the enlisted caves are the world largest caves systems (Gulden, 2016).
Table. 1.1. List of largest and most studied caves world wide
Cave Name Length
(km) Location Discovery Reference
Mammoth cave 651.8 Kentucky, USA 1791
Gulden, 2016
Sistema Dos Ojos Cave 335.0 Quintana Roo, Mexico 1987
Jewel cave 289.8 South Dakota, USA 1900
Sistema Ox Bel Ha cave 257.1 Quintana Roo, Mexico 1996
Optymistychna cave 236.0 Korolivka, Ukraine 1966
Wind cave 229.7 South Dakota, USA 1881
Lechuguilla cave 222.6 New Maxico, USA 1900
Clear water cave 215.3 Sarawak, Malaysia 1978
Fisher Ridge cave 200.5 Kentucky, USA 1981
Holloch cave 200.4 Moutathal, Switzerland 1875
List of largest caves in Pakistan
Like other countries Pakistan has many caves which are still unexplored
biospeleologically. Pakistan Cave Research and Caving Federation is a national body
established by Mr. Hayatullah Khan Durrani who also represented Pakistan in Union
of International Speleology (UIS), and British Caving Federation (BCA).
Table. 1.2. List of caves in Pakistan
Cave Name Length (km) Location
Pir Ghaib Gharr cave >1.20 Balochistan
Kashmir smast (cave) 0.188 Mardan KPK
Gondrani cave Unknown Bela, Balochistan
Bhaggar cave Unknown Azad Kashmir, Pakistan
Juniper Shaft cave Unknown Balochistan
Mughagull Ghara cave Unknown Balochistan
Mughall saa cave Unknown Balochistan
Mangocher cave Unknown Balochistan
Microbial community in cave environment
The common types of caves throughout world are limestone caves made in limestone
rocks and basalt rocks. Caves have poor nutrients oligotrophic ecosystem (below 2 mg
of TOC per liter), having low temperature, complete darkness and high humidity. The
average number of microbes in cave ecosystem is 106 cells/gram of rock (Barton and
Jurado, 2007). Photosynthetic organisms are found only in the entrance zone of cave
but some are also present inside due to artificial light mounted by public. Due to light
absence in cave the primary production of organic substances by microbes are
negligible. But still there are different chemolithoautotrophic processes occur and
microbes are potentially involved in such processes. Microorganism in such
environment used hydrogen, nitrogen or other organic compounds as well as reduced
form of metals found in the cave rocks around like iron and manganese (Gadd, 2010,
Northup and Lavoie, 2001). The allochtonous matters source is water which leaking
through cracks in rocks from soil above the rocks, or air which transfers the organic
particles. Besides these plant roots, anthropogenic activities, remnants of mammals
may provide organic compounds which promote the growth of heterotrophic microbes.
Microbial community structure of caves is influenced by many factors include pH,
availability of nutrients, light, oxygen, different metals compounds, water, and
susceptibility of substrates to colonization (Engle et al. 2010; Jones and Bennett, 2014).
Due to low nutrients availability, low temperature, high humidity highly adoptive and
extremophiles microbes can only survive in cave environment (Rothschild and
Mancinelli, 2001). Most microbial communities depend on the energy and carbon
fixation of photosynthesis. Ageless darkness avoid the phototrophs colonization in cave
environment (Barton and Jurado, 2007). The chemoautotrophs are the subordinates of
the caves climates which import energy into caves by fixing carbon (Sarbu, et al.,
1996). Bacteria, archaea and fungi are the most founded biodiversity in caves and
omnipresent in cave habitats such as stream water, soil, rocks surfaces and sediments
(Engel, et al., 2004). Inside caves environment many bacterial phyla have been reported
by using 16S rRNA genes sequencing (Ortiz, et al., 2013). The most abundant taxa on
caves walls are proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria (Barton, et al., 2007;
Pašić, et al., 2010; Cuezva, et al., 2012). Bacterial diversity of cave soil and sediment
could be comparable (Ortiz, et al., 2013), while the rock surfaces have lowest microbial
community (Macalady et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2011). Cave microbiota is highly
variable due to microhabitats of cave. In a single cave different bacterial diversity and
rocks composition were observed possibly due to the geochemistry of rocks (Barton et
al., 2007). Nutrients availability and disturbance also affect the microbial diversity
inside a cave. Microbes and organic matter could be pipe in into caves by air flow,
water seepage, and may be by entrance of human and animals into caves (Shabarova et
al., 2013). Eight different microbial phyla were identified by Pasic et al, (2010)
dominated by Proteobacteria followed by Actinobacteria, Nitrospira, Acidobacteria,
Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadales, Verrucomicrobia and Planctomycetales (Fig. 1.4).
Fig. 1.4. Distribution of major groups of microbial communities in cave
environments by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Pasic et al., 2009)
Sulfidic caves environments are appreciable for the chemotrophic organisms and
colonized by a thick filamentous microbial mat. These microbes oxidize sulfur for the
energy requirement (Boston et al., 2006). The sulfur oxidation process by microbes is
characterized by water rich in H2S source and limited in oxygen (Chen et al., 2009).
(Engel, 2007) have reported that the ε-Proteobacteria along with γ-, β-, and α-
proteobacterial are the most sulfur oxidizer in sulfidic cave system. Some nitrite and
ammonia oxidizers were also isolated from Movile cave Romania (Chen et al., 2009).
Many methylotrophic microbes such as Methylothenera, Methylophilus and
Methylovorus were also reported in the same research. These methylotrophic were
related to degradation of chitin like substances or methanogenesis.
Table. 1.3. Cave microbes isolated from different caves in different country through out the world
Caves Country Microbes Proponents/ Year
Nullabor Caves Australia α, β, γ and δ-Proteobacteria and novel microorganisms Holmes et al. 2001
Altamira Cave Spain Proteobacteria, Plantomycetales,
Cytophagal/Flexibacter/Bacteroides, Acidobacterium,
Actinobacteria and green-sulfur bacteria
Schabereiter-Gurtner et al. 2002
Cuezva et al, 2009
Reed Flute Guilin, Guangxi, China Knoellia sinensis and K. subterranea (Actinobacteria) Groth et al. 2002
Lower Kane Cave Wyoming, USA ε-Proteobacteria Engel et al. 2003
Lechuguilla Spider Carlsbad Caverns National
Park New Mexico, USA
α, β and γ-Proteobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae,
Xanthomonas, Bacillus/Coliform group and
Lactobacillaceae
Northup et al. 2003
Llonin La Garma Asturias, Northern Spain Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Gram-positive bacteria Schabereiter-Gurtner et al. 2004
Kartchner Caverns Arizona, USA Bacillus, Brevibacillus, Rhizobium, Sphingomonas,
Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and other uncultured
β-Proteobacteria
Ikner et al. 2006
Engel et al, (2004) assessed three aphotic springs in cave with regards to bacterial
diversity using 16S rDNA phylogenetic analysis and found the bacterial diversity was
very low but the most dominant taxonomic group in sulfidic cave spring was
Epsilonproteobacteria (68%) affiliated bacteria. The other affiliations of the bacterial
strains were with Gammaproteobacteria (12.2%), Betaproteobacteria (11.7%),
Deltaproteobacteria (0.8%), and the Acidobacterium (5.6%) and
Bacteriodetes/Chlorobi (1.7%) divisions shown in (Fig. 1.4).
Cave microbes and biomineralization
The role of cave microbes in cave ecosystem is valuable since these microbes are able
to colonize rock surfaces and to use organic and inorganic compounds as energy
sources. These microbes are interesting for the study of biomineralization process due
to stable microclimatic conditions in the cave, where bioinduced mineral fabrics are
conserved without important diagenatic modifications (Canaveras et al., 2006;
Sanchez-Moral et al., 2006).
Caves rocks and soil host a wide range of metals, among which iron is one of the
dominants. Oxidized iron is found in deposits while reduced form of iron is present in
cave water. Iron oxidizing microbes such as Leptothrix, Gallionelle and Siderooxidans
were found to reside in sediments (Peck, 1986), water (Moore, 1981), and in
speleothems (Kasama and Murakami, 2001). These microbes induce iron
mineralization at the point of contact of seeps and springs with oxygen. Bacterial
mineralization was found four times more on ferrohydrite speleothems (Kasama and
Murakami, 2001). Although the role of bacteria in biominralization and iron ores
formation has rarely been studied (Wu et al., 2009; Baskar et al., 2012).
Carbonates precipitation by cave microbes
In the history of earth, microbes play an important role in mineral deposition and are
active in biomineralization (Ehrlich, 1996). Bacterial strains isolated from different
environments were found to possess the capability of precipitating calcium carbonate
in both laboratory and natural condition (Morita, 1980; Rivadeneyra et al., 1993). The
phenomena of calcium carbonates precipitation in cave environment has been reported
in many research studies in last two decades (Castanier et al., 1999; Forti, 2001; Barton
and Northup, 2007). Precipitation may be enhanced by removal of crystallization
inhibitors by bacteria (Bosak and Newman, 2005), shifting of pH of micronutrient
environment around the microbes, or nitrogen release and fixation (Castanier et al.,
1999; Hammes and Verstraete, 2002; Cacchio et al., 2004). It has also been reported by
several researchers that bacterial cell pump the Ca2+ ion from inside to outside medium
to avoid the toxic effect of calcium concentration (Cacchio et al., 2004; Cai and Lytton,
2004). Calcium precipitation has been correlated with metabolic process and with
microbial cell wall structure (Mastromei et al., 1999).
It has been proposed that precipitation of calcium carbonate by microbes could be
considered to avoid or prevent emission of CO2 (Sharma et al., 2008). It has been
reported that bacteria play an important role in crystal nucleation, (Sanchez-Moral et
al., 2012). Several studies on calcium carbonate precipitation reported different
mechanisms for the microbial mediated carbonate precipitation. Minerals adsorption to
surface of cell could trigger microbial mediated biomineralization, in which bacterial
cell act as nucleus for precipitation (Buczynski and Chafetz, 1991; Rivadeneyra et al.,
2010).
Manganese oxidation by cavernicoles
Manganese is the fourth widely distributed element in the Earth’s crust, and occurs in
different oxidation states from -3 to +7. Manganese is important element for all living
things. Only three form of Mn are significant for living things i.e +2, +3, and +4. The
+2 form of Mn is soluble in earth crust while +3 and +4 are in precipitated form. The
oxidation/ reduction of Mn is catalyzed by microbes. The Mn oxides are reduced by
many anaerobic bacterial strains either by acid production or by production of reducing
substances such as sulfides or these microbes use the oxidized metal as an electron
acceptor in respiration (Lovley 1991; Nealson and Myers 1992; Nealson and Little
1997). Many aerobic microorganisms are reported to catalyze the Mn+2 oxidation
(Ehrlich 1984; Ghiorse 1984). Microbes accelerate the Mn+2 oxidation five times as
compared to abiotic Mn oxidation (Nealson et al. 1988; Tebo 1991; Wehrli, 1990). In
terrestrial environment, a continuous oxidation reduction cycle of Mn takes place in
oxic/anoxic condition. In such environment, Mn acts as a redox shuttle in oxidation
reduction of organic carbon (Nealson and Myers 1992).
Applications of cavernicoles
The cave microbes have many industrial applications. Cavernicoles are used for the
preservation of ancient testimonials and sculpture via the identifications of microbial
species which precipitate the protective coating of calcite. Cave environment is
nutrients limited in which the microbes compete for nutrients and fight for survival.
Due to this ability of cavernicoles, these microbes produce metabolites against other
microbes. Therefore, these microbes are used for the production of novel antimicrobial
compounds. Besides antibiotics these microbes also produce antifungal and anticancer
compounds which are the basic need of today medical science.
Cavernicoles play a significant role in biomineralization. These microbes precipitate
calcium carbonate five times more than outside microbes. The rate of manganese
oxidation by cave microbes is more significant than other environment microbes.
The strange character of cave microbes is the ability of bioremediation.
The cave microbes are also a possible good source of beneficial compounds like
extremozymes (Singh et al., 2011), biosurfactants (Banat et al., 2010), antitumorals
(Chang et al., 2012), exopolysaccharides (Nicolaus et al., 2010), radiation-protective
drugs (Singh and Gabani, 2011). Other applications of these microbes are they take part
in biospeleogenesis and biocementation.
Aim and Objective
The aim of the study was to conduct initial assessments of bacteria which can produce
antibiotics, industrially important enzymes, degrade plastic, have ability to mineralize
manganese and carbonate and geochemistry of caves in Pakistan.
The objectives of the study were
To collect soil, guano and speleothem samples from Kashmir cave using
standard microbiological procedures
To analyze soil, guano and speleothem samples geochemically.
To isolates microbes and screen for the production of antibacterial compounds
and industrially important enzymes.
To study the efficiency of isolated bacterial strains to degrade polyethylene
plastic.
To screen the cave bacteria for their ability to mineralize manganese and carbonate
precipitation.
Literature Review
Cave
Cave is a natural underground hollow space large enough for an individual to enter.
Most caves are formed naturally by weathering of limestone rocks and extend deep
underground. Initial reports about study of cave trace dates back to 17th century and
mid of 19th century. Biospeleology is a study of microbial life and its interaction with
all other branches of natural sciences i.e. chemical sciences, geological sciences,
materials sciences, environmental sciences and also describes microbes’ interaction
with the minerals in the caves. Globally, the ratio of caves is very less and its access is
limited due to danger, hard environment, darkness and no preindications (Crane and
Fletcher, 2015).
Cave environment has a stable constant interior temperature, low availability of
nutrient, excess of humidity and acidic pH (slightly) (Biswas, 2010). The humidity
raises up to 100%, while the maximum temperature may raise to 10oC inside the cave.
Initially, scientists thought that due to low content of nutrient, no source of light and
acidic condition, caves are not suitable to host life but the hypothesis was proved wrong
later (Engle, 2015).
For the geological study of mankind and earth, caves provide a way of collecting
information and to determine Earth’s biological history, paleontologists utilized fossil
data. In the past, caves used to be a hiding and living place for people, while in present
era caves are utilized for vegetable and fruit storage and mushroom growth.
Fermentation of wine and cheese required constant temperature and dark environment
thus caves are a suitable reservoir for that. Due to constant temperature and high
humidity people in the past used caves as hospitals, to treat patients with respiratory
illnesses.
Since 1940 bat feces are being used as fertilizer. Scientists are using natural resources
and habitat of cave for human benefits. For protection and conservation of cave
resources for the upcoming generations, cave study is very important (Burcham, 2009).
Edouard-Alfred Martel, a French scientist, was the pioneer of cave study and
considered as father of speleology. Societe de Speleologie, the first association related
to the study of cave, was founded by Edouard-Alfred Martel and his colleague in 1895.
Geochemistry of cave
Caves are the most stable component of the environment which acts as a reservoir for
different material like physical, biological and chemical deposits. The most important
chemical deposits are speleothems. Besides, these caves have unique and ancient
biology which very rarely are interrupted by humans. Ancient people used caves as a
shelter and for the search of different important substances not available from other
places on Earth but caves were rich source of these substances. From prehistoric to
present times, endorsed the idea of uses of caves for different minerals and other
important compounds. Some evidences suggested that ~30,000 years ago humans used
caves for searching of pigments like iron and manganese oxides and hydrooxides for
different ornamental uses like paints. Later on the cave mining was expanded for the
mineralogical studies (Larocca, 2005).
Most of the caves are composed of calcium carbonate, a few natural cavities have been
studied for the minerals in detail, about 350 cave minerals have been investigated in
which some are new to science (Onac and Forti, 2011).The presence of such new unique
compounds may be due to the corrosion of rock material with water before entering
into the caves and remain as sediment over there. Different mechanisms are involved
in different caves for mineralogical reactions these mechanisms include; evaporation,
dehydration, oxidation, sublimation, hydration, deposition of particles from aerosols
and vapors, and segregation. The driving parameters for these reactions are temperature
and pH of the cave environment. Another most important driver of such reactions is
microorganisms. The stable environment of cave allows the formation of huge crystals
alongwith more common small numerous aggregates of different compounds (Onac and
Fort, 2011).
More common compounds like calcite and gypsum and less common like vanadate are
identified from different caves along with other more than 250 minerals (Hill and Forti,
1997). About 4000 years ago Assyrians around Tigris River used Niter from caves for
food preservation. Similarly, Native Americans search mirabilite, epsomite and gypsum
in Mammoth cave, USA (Farnham, 1820; Broughton, 1972; Tankersley, 1996).
Recently, halite caves of Atacama were mined for salt supply to the country (De Waele
et al., 2009). Another most important material called Guano (phosphate rich source)
used as natural fertilizer was extracted from caves worldwide (Abel and Kyrle, 1931;
Badino et al., 2004; Onac et al., 2007).
It must be emphasized that the genesis of many of the minerals found in caves is
unrelated to the existence of the cave itself; they were often brought in by owing or
seeping water or were exposed by the corrosion of the cave walls. By definition “a cave
mineral is a secondary deposit precipitated inside a human- sized natural cavity”,
where secondary means, a mineral derived from a primary mineral existing in the
bedrock or cave sediment through a physicochemical reaction (Hill and Forti, 1997).
The generic term that encompasses all secondary deposits formed in caves is
speleothem (cave).
As cave speleothem is composed of 90% of calcite and aragonite therefore caves have
attracted people for important mineral extraction. For the first time, White (1961)
studied cave for minerals. About 350 types of minerals were identified from different
caves (Hill and Forti, 1997; Back and Mandarino, 2008).
Calcium carbonate is one of the major chemical compounds found in caves. Besides,
many other chemical compounds are found in cave. Many of the compounds were first
identified inside cave and later they were detected outside the cave as well (Garavelli
and Quagliarella, 1974; Martini, 1978, 1980a, 1980b, 1983, 1992; Bridge and
Robinson, 1983; Back and Mandarino, 2008). The main reason for this is the interaction
of water with different chemical compounds prior entry into the cave. Basically four
main types of solutions which interact with cave bedrocks may include Connate (water
and minerals ions trap in pores of sedimentary rocks), Juvenile (water rich with volatile
fluids), Meteoric (water derived from precipitation of snow and rain) and seawater.
Temperature and pH of the interaction point also greatly influence the concentration of
mineral species and dissolution.
It is a known fact that the major carrier for minerals and chemicals into the caves is
water, but some sources like lava, vents, thermos mineral compounds etc. also plays
role in mineral ion transportation into the cave, which help in the generation of different
minerals inside cave by different minerogenic and biological mechanisms (White,
1997; Onac, 2005; Forti et al., 2006). The driving force for such reactions and processes
are temperature, relative humidity, and carbon dioxide concentration, and are greatly
enhance by endemic microorganisms.
Dissolution/Re-precipitation
The dissolution and re-precipitation processes involve the dissolution of minerals with
water current prior enter into caves and after entry, the caves temperature control the
evaporation and the minerals precipitate again. When water vapors evaporate, rocks
interact with them and release of Ca2+, Na+, Mg2+, K+ and SO42- ions occur which
diffuse into solution. When these mineral filled solutions enter into caves, this water
evaporate and minerals precipitate again. By this mechanism the formation of
speleothem also takes place with the soluble minerals such as halite, epsomite,
mirabilite other sulfates (De Waele et al., 2009) and in limestone and/or gypsum
cavities throughout the world (Forti, 1996a). Similarly, the precipitation of opal found
in large quantity in quartzite caves of Venezuela (Forti, 1996b).
The mineral dissolution and re-precipitation mechanism also occur in volcanic cavities.
When the temperature of lava decreases, water solubilizes the minerals by entering into
the cavities via fissures or porous surfaces and dissolves various salts. When this
solution exposed to hot environment of caves, it rapidly evaporates and allows the re-
precipitation of dissolved mineral.
Geochemical reactions in caves
The weathering processes involve the aerobic and anaerobic reaction mechanisms
leading to deposition of mineral ions and other compounds. The most important and
abundant compounds are oxides and hydroxides, sulfates, carbonates and nitrates. The
mechanisms involved in these depositions are oxidation/reduction (redox),
hydration/dehydration and double replacement reactions.
Oxidation/Reduction
When the ground water penetrates in rocks, it changes the environment to anoxic and
slightly acidic which favors the conversion of pyrite, sulfide, and limestone to a number
of oxides and hydroxides by oxidation. The oxidation of hydrogen sulfide to sulfuric
acid is also reported from sulfidic caves, which extremely decrease the pH of the cave
environment and formation of sulfur speleothem occurred (Forti and Mocchiutti, 2004).
Comparatively, the reduction process in cave is less common than oxidation (White,
1976). The reduction reactions are occurred anaerobically, in which the organic
compounds are reduced for energy uptake. In some caves the geological boundary is
developed which switching off and on the oxidation and reduction mechanism called
‘bohnerz’ (Seemann, 1970; Forti, 1987; Onac, 1996).
Most of the redox reactions are mediated by microbes e.g. reduction processes involved
in the reduction of sulfur, manganese, iron and nitrogen.
Hydration/Dehydration
Hydration and dehydration is the condition of incorporation and removal of water
molecule from any mineral which affects the state of that particular mineral. Caves are
considered one of the humid environments containing more than 85% humidity in most
of the caves. In some caves the evaporation process increase in part of the cave or in
whole cave which lead to removal of water molecules from some hydrated minerals
and convert into different form. Similarly, in humid part of the caves some dehydrated
minerals may absorb water molecule from surrounding and covert into hydrated form
of minerals which may affect their crystalline structure.
Common example of hydration and dehydration is hydrated mirabilite
(Na2SO4·10H2O) and dehydrated thenardite (Na2SO4) (Bertolani, 1958). Similarly, the
epsomite (MgSO4.7H2O) convert into hexahydrite (MgSO4·6H2O) by the release of one
water molecule and further release of water molecule convert it into kieserite
(MgSO4·H2O) (Bernasconi, 1962; White, 1997). Example of some other hydration and
dehydration processes are bassanite (CaSO4·0.5H2O) hydrated into gypsum
(CaSO4·2H2O) (Forti, 1996). Martini (1980a) also reported the conversion of
mbobomkulite (monoclinic mineral of the chalcoalumite (Ni, Cu)Al4[(NO3)2,
SO4]2(OH)12 • 3H2O group) into hydrombobomkulite (A monoclinic sky blue mineral
containing aluminum, copper, hydrogen, nickel, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur).
Double replacement reactions
In double replacement reaction, the interchange of a part of two compounds with each
other, which lead to the formation of two other compounds. As most of the caves like
limestone caves are composed of carbonates so frequently carbonate is involved from
one side and strong or weak acid at other side in such reactions. Strong acid favors the
oxidation processes and carryout the formation of sulfuric acid from pyrite of H2S (Pohl
and White, 1965; Hill, 1987), and phosphoric acid and nitric acid in environments
where guano is present (Hill and Forti, 1997; Onac, 2000).
The most common final mineral products (as a result of double displacement) are
nitrate, phosphate and sulfate. Such minerals are involved in the generation of a number
of speleothems like, moon milk to flowstone and a number of crystals like helictites to
euhedral. Similarly, gypsum is the common mineral precipitated by double exchange
reactions.
Karst
The karstification and speleothem formation typically occurs when underground water
molecules react with carbonate rocks. This phenomenon can be expressed by a single
chemical reaction as;
CaCO3 (solid) + H2O + CO2 (gas) <--------->Ca2+ (aqueous) + 2HCO3- (aqueous)
In this reaction the gaseous CO2 reacts with limestone and causes its dissolution, while
on the other hand reaction occurs to precipitate the calcite and aragonite to form
speleothem and release the CO2 into environment. Approximately, 95% of speleothems
(calcite and aragonite) are precipitated in this manner, and it is known that about 97%
of deposits are composed of calcite and aragonite in caves (Dreybrodt, 1988; Hill and
Forti, 1997; Palmer, 2007; Onac, 2011).
This phenomenon is high in carbonate caves, but same process occurs for mineral
deposition in caves other than carbonate.
The first condition is almost always available in a cave while the second one totally
depend on the dissolution of Ca2+, Mg2+ etc. in the water seeping into the caves. The
second condition almost acts as a limiting condition for the formation of speleothem in
caves.
Microbe - mineral interaction
It is a known fact that microbes are found everywhere in the world. Ability of microbes
to adapt to the environment and play key role in biological and geological processes
made them unique from all other biological species. It is also known that
microorganisms have their impact on the development of secondary chemical deposits
in caves (Shaw, 1997). In early stage of cave explorations it was believed that the
speleothems e.g. stalactites, stalagmites, coralloids, pool fingers, etc. have the ability to
grow like plants (Tourneford, 1704). The understanding of microbial – rocks interaction
clearly demonstrates the role of microbiota in the development of caves and deposition
of minerals (Northup and Lavoie, 2001; 2004; Barton, 2006; Jones, 2010).
Studies on the microbial role demonstrate that enzymes produced by microorganisms
are directly involved in the biomineralization of minerals which lead to the precipitation
and accumulation. These enzymes may change pH of the surrounding or enhance the
reaction speed (Northup et al., 1997; Boston et al., 2001).
Different types of microbes are found in the caves. These may include chemolithotrophs
and chemoheterotrophs. Mainly microbes are busy in redox reactions (Sasowsky and
Palmer, 1994). Chemolithotrophs obtain their energy from oxidation of inorganic
materials, while chemoheterotrophs carry out oxidation of organic matter to obtain
energy.
Microorganisms have the same mechanisms for weathering and mineralization inside
caves irrespective of nature of the cave but some mechanisms and processes are limited
to some specific caves. Some reactions require large amount of silica and thus these
processes are restricted to volcanic caves. In some volcanic caves of Korea (Kashima
et al., 1989) the formation of coralloids and helictates are mainly due to the presence
of specific diatom Meolosira. The presence of Meolosira sp. is found only in twilight
zones of caves. Onac et al. (2001) reported the role of microorganisms in speleothem
deposition and precipitation of silica as Opal, opal-CT and quartz.
In addition, microbes have been found to enhance weathering of basaltic rocks into
amorphous silica moon milk in lave tube caves Pico Island (Azores) and Rapa Nui
Island. The organic richness of deposits indicates that microorganisms control
weathering processes (Forti, 2005; Calaforra et al., 2008). The caves of Pico Island
have the largest opal flowstone which is formed from silica moon milk (Forti, 2001).
Generally, the role of microorganisms in cave formation; weathering and mineral
precipitation is an established fact. These are complex processes and involve microbial
enzymes with a variety of mechanisms and reactions. These processes are complex and
take a long period of time. A number of different reactions like dissolution, double
displacement reaction, redox reactions are responsible for formation of phosphate,
sulfate, nitrate and other minerals.
Precipitation of guano related minerals
It is found that all type of caves contain organic deposit of bat guano although traces of
some other animals are also found. Guano is rich organic complex material host a
number of different reactions mostly of biological origin which lead to the formation
of different acids like nitric acid, phosphoric acid and sulfuric acids (Forti, 2001). These
acids react with carbonate and other sediments which produce more than 100 different
secondary minerals (Onac, 2005, 2011b). Some important compounds directly produce
in guano are guanine and urea.
In cave environment there are two sources of NO3- ions, one is the decaying forest
material in humid zones and the second one is deposit of guano which contain N2.
The Process of Cave formation (Speleogenesis)
The process of cave formation is a conventional procedure of mineral dissolution by
ground water. This process is dependent on climatic parameters; speleogenesis is
mostly rapid in humid and warm climate (Priesnitz, 1974). The solubility is minerals
specific. The most soluble rock type is limestone which is composed of calcite,
aragonite, and dolomite. At higher concentration of CO2, the carbonates dissolve
rapidly, the reactions are:
CO2 (g) ↔ CO2 (aq) -----(1)
CO2 (aq) + H2O ↔ H2CO3-----(2)
CaCO3 (s) + H2CO3(aq) ↔ Ca2++ 2HCO3------(3)
Equation (3) is a partial reaction, which combines with the equations (4) and (5) and
cause calcite dissolution (Plummer et al., 1978). This process can also be summarized
in one equation (6).
CaCO3 (s) + H+ ↔ Ca2+ + HCO3------(4)
CaCO3 (s) + H2O ↔ Ca2+ + HCO3- + OH------(5)
CaCO3 (s) + CO2 (aq) + H2O ↔ Ca2+ + 2HCO3------(6)
According to equation 4 and 6, the pH and CO2 concentration in water are the two key
factors influencing the kinetics of limestone dissolution. These factors are at
equilibrium at the atmosphere in systems, CO2 concentration depends on pCO2 (sea
level value is ca. 39Pa, which is corresponding to the 0.039% concentration) and
temperature (solubilization of CO2 is lower at increase temperature). Thus for cave
development on bare rocks free of soil and vegetation, temperature climate would
provide ideal environment. While in case of covered rocks, biological processes in soil
are the vital source of CO2 instead of atmosphere. In this situation temperature,
humidity and primary production levels are the factors which determine the
concentration of soil CO2 and fluxes (Lloyd and Taylor, 1994; Raich and Schlesinger,
1992; Rustad and Fernandez, 1998). The CO2 proportion in soil gases are normally
range from 0.2-11% but up to 17% is also reported in tropical regions (Derbyshire,
1976; Hashimoto et al., 2004; Köhler, 2009; Kursar, 1989; Liu et al., 2010). While in
moderate climate the average range is from 0.1-3.5% but values up to 10.2% are also
reported occasionally (Bekele et al., 2007; Davidson et al., 2007; Derbyshire, 1976;
Jassal et al., 2005). Thus, microbial and plant respiration is capable to raise the CO2
concentration more than hundred time as compared to atmospheric conditions and to
speed up the speleogenesis (Gabrovsek et al., 2000). Acid production by microbes also
accelerates the minerals solubility.
The above discussed conventional speleogenesis mostly depends on water and carbonic
acid dissolution in the very common type of rocks. Along limestone rocks other forms
of karst are also exist. In barokarst speleogenesis the process is enhanced by pressure
corrosion, while hot springs and steam play a key role in thermokarst formation.
Another specific type of limestone rock is hypokarst where the cave formation starts
from inside of bedrock, this type of speleogenesis is happen at the edge of oxic and
anoxic zones in the presence of high value of H2S in ground water. This type of
speleogenesis is called Sulfuric Acid Speleogenesis (SAS) and was first proposed by
Egemeier in 1970’s (Egemeier, 1981). In this mechanism the H2S is evaporate into the
cave environment and oxidized to sulfuric acid (H2SO4) on the surfaces of wet bedrock
which cause the renewal of carbonate by gypsum, which can be easily dissolve in water
that considerable raise the void volume (Hill, 1990; Palmer, 1991).
H2SO4 + CaCO3 + H2O→CaSO4.2H2O + CO2
Different famous caves are formed by this mechanism in world e.g., Lechuguilla
(USA), Frasassi (Italy), Novaya Afonskaya (Georgia). Light sulphur isotopes have been
isolated from gypsum in above studied sites which hint the involvement of
microorganisms in such processes. While the role of microbes in this type of
speleogenesis is still under debate, Engle and his colleagues have reported that sulfur
oxidizing microbes having affiliation with β-, γ-, and ε-Proteobacteria may play role in
H2S oxidation and carbonates dissolution than abiotic processes under certain
conditions (Engel et al., 2004). Microbes use H2S as an energy source. For example,
in sulfidic caves, the microbes oxidize H2S and form sulfuric acid, which further react
with carbonate and causes dissolution of rocks (Engel, et al., 2004, Macalady, et al.,
2007).
Factors Affecting Speleogenesis
There are at least eight different factors which are involved in solubility of calcite,
dolomite and rate at which solution occurs, which are: CO2 concentration in solution,
pH, organic matters oxidation, temperature, pressure, concentration of added salts, rate
of solution flow, and degree of solution mixing. Calcium carbonate is more soluble if
CO2 concentration is raised, pH is decreased, O2 and organic compounds are increased,
temperature is lowered, pressure is raised, salts concentration is increased, rate of flow
is increased and increased the degree of mixing (Thrailkill, 1968).
Concentration of CO2 is a single key factor which affect the solution because CO2
react with water to form carbonic acid (H2CO3). The air normally has a pressure of
1atmosphere, and has a partial pressure of 0.0003 atm of CO2. Rain water dissolve
small amount of calcite during rain. Water having oxygen and organic compounds
and possess 0.1 atm of carbon dioxide are capable to dissolve a lot of calcite (Moore,
1981).
Microbial calcium carbonates precipitation (MCP)
The phenomena of calcium carbonates precipitation have been studied from last two
decades (Barton and Northup, 2007; Castanier et al., 1999; Forti, 2002). Microbially
induced calcium carbonate precipitation is an environmental friendly process to protect
decayed ornamental stones. This process relies on microbially induced carbonate
precipitation of limestone. Unlike that from lime-water treatment, the carbonate cement
formed under bacterial influence appears to be highly coherent (Metayer-Levrel et al.,
1999). This method has been used for the durability of cementitious materials
(Ramachandran et al., 2001; Muynck et al., 2008). Cave environment is favorable for
the chemical precipitation (Castanier et al., 1999; Ehrlich, 1998) while the role of
microbes in this process is nevertheless discussed. The carbonates precipitation is
biologically induced and controlled mechanism which is reported from caves
environment (Barton et al., 2001; Boquet et al., 1973; Cañaveras et al., 2001; Douglas
and Beveridge, 1998). Different factors are involved in Carbonates precipitation by
bacteria e.g., elimination of mineralization inhibitors by bacteria (Bosak and Newman,
2005), changing in microenvironment pH via autotrophic process, or by fixation or
release of nitrogen (Cacchio et al., 2004; Castanier et al., 1999; Hammes and
Verstraete, 2002). Some scientists believe that calcium carbonate precipitation by
microbes is active pumping of calcium ions (Ca+2) from inside of cell into outside
medium, to avoid the toxicity of calcium concentrations (Cacchio et al., 2004; Cai and
Lytton, 2004). A mutant strain from which a ChaA gene was knocked out, lost the
expression of Ca+2 ion efflux protein and also stopped growth on a medium having
carbonate, as opposed to the wild type (Banks et al., 2010). These authors proposed that
bacterial cell play a key role in initial crystal nucleation, which was further confirmed
by Sanchez-Moral et al (2012), who reported that bacterial cell would promote initial
steps of deposition. Rusznyak et al. (2012) reported some microbes having the
capability of specific crystal formation in harvesting experiments were isolated from
speleothems of Herrenberg Cave (Germany). The carbonate accumulation was
described to be less favorable for the growth of microbes (Sanchez-Moral et al., 2012).
Microbial cells excrete polysaccharides and wide range of amino acids outside which
also may influence the formation of crystals, even placed in abiotic carbonate
environment (Braissant et al., 2003). Altogether, for the initiation of carbonate crystal
formation, their shapes, and precipitation, microorganism play a vital role.
Mechanisms of microbial calcium carbonate precipitation
The carbonate precipitation is biologically induced and controlled mechanism which is
reported from caves environment (Barton et al., 2001). Microbial carbonate
precipitation (MCP) occurs as a byproduct of common microbial metabolic processes,
such as: 1. Photosynthesis (McConnaughey and Whelan, 1997), 2. Urea hydrolysis
(Stocks-Fischer et al., 1999) and 3. Sulfate reduction (Castanier et al., 1999). Bacterial
cells have negative surface charge, which act as a scavenger of cations, containing Ca+2
and Mg+2 bind on to cell surfaces, which making microbes as an ideal nucleation sites
for crystals e.g., MCP (Stocks-Fischer et al., 1999; Ercole et al., 2007). Another
advantage of MCP is its capability of sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide
through CaCO3 formation (Barath et al., 2003). Bio-precipitation of calcium carbonate
technologies have many importance e.g. used in sand columns consolidation (Nemati
and Voordouw, 2003), for repair of limestone monuments (Fujita et al., 2000) and to a
smaller extent for remediation of cracks in concrete (Ramachandran et al., 2001).
Fig. 2.1. The process of calcium carbonate precipitation by bacteria (Braissant et
al. 2009)
The second mechanism by which bacteria precipitate the calcium carbonate is
microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICCP). Ureolytic bacteria
hydrolyze urea and form wide rang of carbonates in short period of time. In urease
controlled reaction, 1 mol of urea is hydrolyzed inside microbial cell and form 1 mol of
ammonia and 1 mol of carbonate, which hydrolyzed spontaneously to form additional
1 mol of ammonia and carbonic acid:
CO(NH2)2 + H2O NH2COOH + NH3
NH2COOH + H2O NH3 + H2CO3
These products equilibrate in water to form bicarbonate, 1 mol of ammonium and
hydroxide ions which give rise to pH increase
H2CO3 2H+ + 2CO3-2
NH3 + H2O NH+4 + OH-
Ca+2 + CO3-2 CaCO3
Bacterial communities have the ability to change the pH of microenvironment to
alkaline via physiochemical reactions. Calcium ions are also concentrated by bacterial
cell surfaces in precipitation (Fortin et al., 1997). At neutral pH, positively charged
particles could make a layer on bacterial cells surfaces due to its negative charge which
favor the heterogenous nucleation (Douglas and Beveridge, 1998; Bäuerlein, 2003).
Calcium carbonates precipitates commonly develop on the outside surfaces of bacterial
cells by successive stratification (Pentecost and Bauld, 1988; Castanier et al., 1999) and
bacterial cells can be embedded in developing crystals (Rivadeneyra et al., 1998;
Castanier et al., 1999).
Fig. 2.2. Bacteria serving as nucleation site for CaCO3 precipitation in the sand
particles (Source: DeJong et al., 2010).
Possible reactions in urea-CaCl2 medium to precipitate CaCO3 at the cell surface can
be summarized as follows:
Ca2+ + Cell → Cell−Ca2+
Cl− + HCO3− + NH3 → NH4Cl + CO32−
Cell−Ca2+ + CO32−→ Cell−CaCO3
Manganese oxidation by bacteria
Manganese oxidation by cavernicoles
The Earth’s crust is composed of about 0.1% manganese (Nealson, 1983). In Earth’s
crust manganese secured fifth position in transition metals (Tebo et al., 2004).
Manganese is present in 7 different oxidation states extending from 0 to +7 while
naturally it is present in +II, +III and +IV states (Tebo et al. 1997, 2004). Mn have
higher redox potential than iron due to which the reduction of Mn is easier than Fe, and
tough to oxidize than Fe (Kirchner and Grabowski, 1972).
Oxyhydroxides are found in abundant after sulfate and carbonate minerals. Many
reports are available which showed the presence of iron and manganese in abundant
form in caves (Hill and Fort, 1997; White et al., 2009; Gazquez et al., 2011) to irregular
surfaces on the walls usually on top of visibly altered carbonates (Northup et al., 2003;
Spilde et al., 2005; Gazquez et al., 2012a). With carbonate and silicate speleothems,
sulfur compounds, oxides of iron and manganese and saltpeter, the microbial
associations have been reported (Northup et al. 1997). The cavernicoles play important
role in mineral precipitation either actively by producing enzymes or other metabolites
which change the microenvironment (Danielli and Edington. 1983), or passively by
acting as nucleation site (Went, 1969). Cave microbes also play an important role in
cave dissolution by producing the acid as a byproduct (Ehrlich, 1996). Speleothems and
cave microbes have many interactions due to which Cunningham et al. (1995) called
speleothems a biothems. In speleothem formation the microbes play a key role.
Manganese compounds are present in caves as in clastic deposit form layer on wall or
speleothems (Gascoin. 1982; Hill. 1982) or as crust (Jones. 1992; Moore. 1981). In
cave, manganese is present in the form of birnessite very common (Hill and Forti,
1997), and some low quantity of crystals oxides and hydroxides like pyrolusite,
chalcophanite, cryptomelane, hausmannite, romanechite, rancieite, todorokite and
rhodochrosite are also reported (Onac et al.. 1997a; Onac et al.. 1997b). From karst
solution a cavity, the manganese is also isolated (Jones, 1992). Peck (1986) and
Northup et al. (2003) provided evidences that manganese oxides reported from caves
are almost biogenic in nature. Mn(IV) oxide are present in aquatic as well as in
terrestrial environment (Post, 1999). Mn boosts the enzymatic activity like DNA
polymerase and phosphoenol pyruvate carboxykinase that is why it is present in a
minute quantity in all living organisms and is an important element for all living
kingdoms (Beyer et al., 1986). Manganese is a strong redox agent and plays an
important part in aerobic biological redox reactions e.g. Mn superoxide dismutase, and
Mn pseudocatalase (Beyer and Fridovich. 1987; Dubinina. 1978). Mn (II) is the soluble
form of manganese or form a complex compound with organic or inorganic ligands,
while Mn(III) is unstable in aquatic condition and readily change to Mn(II) and MnO2
and Mn(IV) forms insoluble oxides and oxyhydroxides. Oxidation of Fe and Mn from
reduced stats in aqous and oxic forms produce a H+ which leads to acidification of the
environment.
2Mn+2+O2(g)+2H2O → 2MnO2(s)+4H+
4Fe+2+O2(g)+10H2O → 4Fe(OH)3(s)+8H+
Microorganisms of caves are capable of production extracellular polymeric substances
(EPSs) and some other metabolites with acidic functional groups, which stress the pH
lowering due to metal oxidation. Due to deprotonation of organic functional group, the
cell walls of bacteria have negative charges at low pH which may act as nucleating sites
for the cation like iron and manganese (Fein, 2009).
Microbes have a key role in the formation of insoluble Mn(III, IV) from the soluble
Mn(II) in natural environments (Tebo et al., 1997). The microbial processes speed up
the oxidation of Mn(II) to Mn(IV) five times faster than surfaced catalyzed reactions
(Nealson et al., 1988; Tebo et al., 2004), and the presence of Manganese oxides in soil,
sediments and aquatic environment are thought to be of biological origin (Nealson et
al., 1988; Tebo, 1991; Wehrli et al., 1995).
Microbial diversity of cave
Caves are natural underground cavities large enough for a human being to enter, mostly
in empty spaces in rocks. Caves are considered as an extreme environment, which is
unsuitable for the life due to extreme abiotic conditions. They form ecological niches
for specific group of microbes (Schabereiter-Gurtner et al., 2004). Most caves in the
world are limestone caves formed from limestone rocks, while lava tube caves are in
basalt rock. An oligotrophic ecosystem is present inside caves. Caves are characterized
by complete darkness, low temperature, and high humidity almost 100%. Due to
oligotrophic conditions the average number of microbes growing is 106 cells/g of rock
(Barton and Jurado, 2007).
Microbes in any environment are dependent on energy and carbon fixation of
photosynthetic organisms, but in case of cave environment where darkness persists
throughout, prevents the phototrophs colonization. Restricted nutrients and energy can
enter into caves through entrance, sinkhole, underground hydrology, and drip waters
(Barton and Jurado, 2007) and the aphotic and oligotrophic environments only allow
for the survival and functioning of species adapted to the oligotrophic conditions, which
clarify the dominancy of chemoautotrophic microbes in cave environments which fixes
carbon and import energy into cave food web (Sarbu et al., 1996; Chen et al., 2009).
Photosynthetic activity occurs only at the entrance of the caves, and sometimes inside
the caves due to artificial light. Perpetual light absence prevents the production of
primary organic compounds by phototrophic microbes. Cavernicoles use alternate
method for the assimilation of carbon associated with chemoautotrophy. In such dark
condition, the primary organic compound is produced by chemolithoautotrophic
microbes, which not only derive energy by binding with hydrogen, nitrogen, or volatile
organic matters but also from oxidation of reduced metal ions (e.g manganese, iron)
available in cave rocks (Gadd, 2010; Northup and Lavoie, 2001). The only source of
allochthonous compound in cave is leaking of water via cracks in rocks from soil
present above it, streams depositing sediments of clay on the walls and floor, or through
air which carries organic compound particles. Besides these, the other sources of
organic matters are remains of human and animal activity or plant roots. The presence
of these organic compounds enhances the growth of heterotrophic organisms.
Bacteria and archaea are the dominant domains of cave environment and are present in
different cave habitats such as sediments, rock surfaces, soils and stream waters (Engel
et al., 2004; Barton and Jurado, 2007). 16S rRNA gene sequencing have been helpful
to identify many bacterial phyla in caves (Engel et al., 2004; Barton et al., 2007; Ortiz
et al., 2013b). According to 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the Proteobacteria,
Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria are the dominant bacterial taxa on cave walls (Barton
et al., 2007; Pašic et al., 2010; Cuezva et al., 2012). Bacterial colonization in sediments
of cave could be comparable to that in overlying soils (Ortiz et al., 2013b), but the
surfaces of cave rocks are colonized by lowest diversity natural microbial communities
(Macalady et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2011). From comparative study of geographical
distinct caves, it was supposed that surfaces of cave rocks could be colonized by
common microbial phyla which are merely found in other habitats, which suggest a
specific bacterial linage in cave environments (Porca et al., 2012).
In past, traditional culturing techniques were used for the study of microbial diversity.
By using such traditional methods, microbial diversity was not found convincingly due
to the inability to grow the microorganisms (Torsvik and Ovreas, 2002). This problem
was overcome by molecular techniques. This is plausibly due to the fact that microbes
that grow in vitro generally comprise a small portion of environmental populations
(Donachie et al., 2007). Nowadays, the most common and accurate methods for the
determining microbial diversity are based on molecular markers, including small (16S
rRNA) and large (23S rRNA) ribosomal RNA genes subunits, as well as functional
genes such as soxB (active in sulfur oxidizing microbes), amoA (active in ammonia
oxidizing microorganisms), RuBisCO (gene found in chemoautotrophic organisms)
and genes critical for cell function, i.e., “housekeeping genes” like rpoB, recA or gyrB
(Holmes et al., 2004).
Fig. 2.3. Distribution of major groups of microbial communities in cave
environments by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Pasic et al., 2010)
Table. 2.1. Different caves are studied for microbial diversity in different
countries
Caves Country Microbes Proponents/Year
Nullabor Caves Australia α, β, γ and δ-Proteobacteria and
novel microorganisms
Holmes et al., 2001
Altamira Cave Spain Proteobacteria, Plantomycetales,
Cytophagal/Flexibacter/Bacteroides,
Acidobacterium, Actinobacteria and
green-sulfur bacteria
Schabereiter-Gurtner
et al., 2002 Cuezva et
al., 2009
Reed Flute Guilin Guangxi
China
Knoellia sinensis and K.
subterranea (Actinobacteria)
Groth et al., 2002
Lower Kane
Cave
Wyoming, USA ε-Proteobacteria Engle et al., 2002
Lechuguilla
Spider
Carlsbad Caverns
National Park New
Mexico, USA
α, β and γ-Proteobacteria,
Enterobacteriaceae, Xanthomonas,
Bacillus/Coliform group and
Lactobacillaceae
Northup et al., 2003
Llonin La
Garma
Asturias, Northern
Spain
Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria,
Gram-positive bacteria
Schabereiter-Gurtner
et al., 2004
Kartchner
Caverns
Arizona, USA Bacillus, Brevibacillus, Rhizobium,
Sphingomonas, Staphylococcus,
Pseudomonas and other uncultured
β-Proteobacteria
Ikner et al., 2006
Applications of cave microorganisms
Recognition of microbes in caves changed our perception about life in cave (Barton and
Northup, 2006). Biospeleology has similarly mirrored the meteoric rise of microbiology
as science, with new insights suggesting that cave microbes may be play a role in
process as varied as speleothem deposition to cavern development (Canaveras et al.,
2006; Engel et al., 2004). Microbes have wide range of activities in cave environment
from obvious slimy goop to the more subtle calcite deposition or changing in the
structure of rocks surfaces. The importance of cave microbes may be of interest to
speleologists, the applications of this study go well beyond caves. The cave microbes
degrade the ancient, prehistoric paintings within cave environment (Schabereiter-
Gurtner et al., 2002). Besides this contribution of cavernicoles in degradation and
conservation of these paintings, but these microbes also have a potential role in major
biogeochemical processes occurring inside cave environment.
Biocementation
Cave microbes have great role in biocementation processes occurring in cave
environment. These microbes colonize on carbonate surfaces which lead to deposition
of calcite. The work had a key role in ancient marble monuments and statues
preservation, where microbes could deposit a coating of calcite to prevent ancient
structures from erosion (Laiz et al., 2003).
Mineral precipitation
In caves, energy is produced by different microbial processes which are used for their
survival. Although these are small reactions which produce nitrates, sulfate, and
carbonate, but play a key role in cave ecosystem. These microbes also play an important
role in minerals precipitation from which the interaction between autotrophic and
heterotrophic can be studied. Heterotrophic microbes are present at the entrance gate of
cave while autotrophic are at the depth of cave, for the growth of autotrophic
microorganisms’ different reactions occur like volcanism, serpentanization and
radiolysis.
These microbes not only precipitate calcite but also oxidize soluble manganese (Mn+2)
to Mn(III, IV) which are the insoluble or precipitated form of manganese. Biogenic Mn
oxides are strongest naturally found oxidants and play a key role in oxidation/reduction
of many organic and inorganic compounds. Biogenic Mn oxides have high sorptive
ability due to which adsorb many ions, controlling the bioavailability of many toxic and
essential elements. Biogenic Mn oxides recognized as “scavengers of the sea”
(Goldberg, 1954). The biogenic Mn oxides are also used in waste water treatment to
oxidize or reduce toxic metals.
Biodegradation
Cave microbes can degrade the complex aromatic compounds, such as benzothiazole
and benezenesulfonic acid for growth which are used in the manufacture of plastic and
are environmentally dangerous contaminants (Bennett and Barton, 2006). Due to this
talent of cavernicoles, these microbes are inoculated into contaminated environments
to degrade and clean pollutants rapidly and to restore the natural habitats in a process
known bioremediation.
Production of enzymes and novel antibiotics
Cavernicoles are adapted to the extreme starvation condition because of this ability
these microbes also have the ability of to harbor other essential biomolecules. Similarly
cave environment have microorganisms which produce ethanol for fuel, extremozyme
which are environmentally friendly and are used in paper procession and even use in
stonewashing of jeans. These microbes also have the ability to produce novel antibiotics
and anticancer metabolites (Onaga, 2001). Cave microbes are possible sources of many
useful compounds: biosurfactants (Banat et al, 2010), antitumors (Chang et al, 2011),
exopolysaccharides (Nicolaus et al, 2010), radiation protective drugs (Singh and
Gabani, 2011). Scientists are doing more and advance research to discover novel
antimicrobial compounds from a new site of microbes. The innovation gap over the
past 30 years, however, two new antibiotics has been introduced: oxazolidinone
linezolid in 2000 and cyclic lipopeptide daptomycin in 2003 (Hamad, 2010). Microbes
are present in soil which plays a key role in regulation of microbial communities in soil,
water, sewage and compost. There are hundreds of antibiotics are produced naturally
in a pure form, among these a few are non-toxic and are used in daily life (Zinsser,
1988).
Biomarkers for extraterrestrial life
Recently NASA once again focusing on exploration of past life and life forms on Moon,
Mars and other extra-terrestrial habitats by simulation models of caves environment
and geochemistry and biology (NASA report, 2014). Finally, one of the philosophical
questions of humanity regards our place in the Universe: Are we alone? Is life on Earth
unique? Cave microbiology can not only answer questions about the limits of life, but
also help us to identify the geochemical signatures of life. Such signatures are capable
of surviving geologic uplift, which allows them to be detected on the surface of planets,
such as Mars (Boston et al., 2001). While such ideas may seem an extraordinary
application of cave geomicrobiology, NASA has recently undergone a dramatic refocus
by gearing its activities to returning humans to the moon and exploration of Mars and
world’s beyond to find evidence of past life, activities in which cave geomicrobiology
may play an important role (White House Press Release, 2004).
Geochemical and mineralogical analysis of Kashmir cave (smast),
Buner, Pakistan, and isolation and characterization of bacteria
having antibacterial activity
Sahib Zada1†, Abbas Ali Naseem2†, Seong-Joo Lee2, Muhammad Rafiq1,Imran Khan1,
Aamer Ali Shah1, Fariha Hasan1*
1Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
2Department of Geology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702 – 701, Korea
ABSTRACT
Bacterial strains having the ability to inhibit the growth of other bacteria, were
isolated from soil sample collected from Kashmir smast (‘smast’ is Pushto
language word means cave), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The study includes
mineralogical and geochemical analyses of soil sample collected from the cave, so
as to describe the habitat from where the microorganisms have been isolated from.
Total bacterial count of the soil sample was 5.25×104 CFU/ml. Four bacterial
isolates having activity against test organisms (Micrococcus luteus, Klebsiella sp.,
Pseudomonas sp. and Staphylococcus aureus) were screened out for further study. Two
of the isolates were found to be Gram positive and the other two Gram negatives.
The four isolates showing antibacterial activity were identified as Serratia sp.
KC1-MRL, Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL, Bacillus sp. KC3-MRL and
Stenotrophomonas sp. KC4-MRL on the basis of 16S rRNA sequence analysis.
Although, all isolates showed antibacterial activity but only Bacillus licheniformis
KC2-MRL was selected for further study on the basis of size of zone of inhibition.
Antibacterial activity of the B. licheniformis KC2-MRL was optimum when grown
in Nutrient broth adjusted to pH 5 and after 24 hours of incubation at 35oC. The
extracted antibacterial compound was stable at pH 5-7 and 40oC when incubated
for 1 hour. The strain was found resistant against cefotaxime (ctx). Atomic
absorption analysis of the soil sample collected from the cave showed high
concentration of calcium (332.938 mg/kg) and magnesium (1.2576 mg/kg) as
compared to the control soil collected from outside the cave. FTIR spectrum of
concentrated protein showed similarity to that of bacitracin. Interestingly, the
antibacterial compound showed activity against both Gram negative and positive
test strains. Mineralogy of Kashmir smast (cave) is diverse and noteworthy. Different
geochemical classes identified by X-ray diffraction were as nitrates, oxides,
phosphates, silicates and sulfates. Weathered cave limestone contribute notably to the
formation of these minerals or compounds. FTIR spectroscopic analysis helped to
identify minerals such as quartz, clinochlore, vermiculite, Illite, calcite and biotite.
Key words: Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL, Kashmir smast, mineralogy,
antibacterial activity
INTRODUCTION
Caves are characterized as having very low nutrient availability constant low
temperatures, and high humidity. Caves can either be terrestrial or aquatic, usually
oligotrophic innature i.e. nutrient limited. Some may be rich in specific natural minerals
or due to exposure to nutrient containing sources, therefore, different caves will have
different types of microorganisms inhabiting various ecological niches. Fauna,
environmental factors, temperature and organic matter, describes the caves’ biotic
activities such as nutrient cycling and geomicrobiological activities including
formation/alteration of cave structures (Adetutu and Ball, 2014).
Cave organisms have evolved some extraordinary abilities to survive and live in
this inhospitable environment (Engel et al., 2005; Simmons et al., 2008; Northup
and Lavoie, 2009). Cave microbial flora is rich in different types of microorganisms
having some diverse and unique characteristics (Groth et al., 1999). The most abundant
organisms observed in caves are filamentous and belong to the Actinobacteria group,
followed by coccoid and bacilli forms (Cuezva et al., 2009). Some pathogenic
microorganisms have also been reported from the Altamira cave (Jurado et al., 2006).
Luong et al. (2010), for the first time, reported the recovery of Aurantimonas
altamirensis from human medical constituents, other than from cave. E. coli and S.
aureus, the disease causing bacteria, have also been isolated from caves (Lavoie and
Northup, 2005) and species of Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas and Alcaligenes sp. (Ikner
et al., 2007) and Inquilinus sp. (Laiz et al., 1999).
Caves can be source of novel microorganisms and biomolecules such as enzymes and
antibiotics that may be suitable for biotechnological purposes (Tomova et al., 2013).
The influence of particular nutrients in antibiotic biosynthesis, was determined by the
chemical structures of antibiotic substances (Pereda et al., 1998). Rigali et al., (2008),
provide evidence that certain substrates and oligotrophic conditions will lead to
increased induction of secondary metabolites. Nitrogen from various sources may
incorporate in antibiotic molecules as precursors or their amino groups can transfer to
specific intermediate products (Doull and Vining, 1990; Cheng et al., 1993). Nutrient
deficiency is responsible for onset of antibiotic biosynthesis (Demain et al., 1983; Doull
and Vining, 1990; Sanchez and Demain, 2002). When carbon or nitrogen source is a
limiting factor, growth is rapidly reduced and antibiotic biosynthesis occurs in the
stationary phase. In other cases, antibiotic production is associated with the growth
phase. Due to the oligotrophic environment in cave ecosystems, microorganisms
present in the cave compete for nutrients and produce antibiotics against other
microbes. Microbial resistance systems against wide spectrum, standard antibiotics,
metabolic by-products such as organic acids, and lytic agents such as lysozyme. Besides
these antibiotics, other biologically active compounds like exotoxins and bacteriocins
were described be Riley and Wertz (2002) and Yeaman and Yount (2003). The
continuous efforts of scientists are to discover new antibiotics and new source
microorganisms. Cave microorganisms can be used for the production of potential new
antibiotics.
Antibiotic producing microbes mostly belong to the genera Penicillium, Streptomyces,
Cephalosporium, Micromonospora, Bacillus (Park et al., 1998) and Pseudomonas
species followed by the entero, lactobacilli and streptococci (Berdy, 2005). More than
8000 antibiotics are known to exist, and hundreds are discovered yearly (Brock and
Madigan, 1991), however only a few prove to be commercially useful. About 17% of
these antibiotics are produced by molds and 74% by Actinomycetes (Zhang et al., 2008).
Bacillus sp. mostly form peptides and phenazines, which are heterocyclic and
derivatives of fatty acid but the production of macrolactones is very rare (Berdy, 2005).
Gramicidins, polymixins, bacitracins and some other antibiotics are formed non-
ribosomally (Nissen-Meyer and Nes, 1997; Hancock and Chapple, 1999).
A great number of antibiotics have been isolated from various microorganisms. Studies
are still being conducted to isolate and identify novel antibiotics effective against
pathogenic fungi and bacteria. The number and species of microorganisms in soil vary
in response to environmental conditions such as nutrient availability, soil texture, and
type of vegetation cover (Atlas and Bartha, 1998). The soil composition and texture
play important role in harboring microbes with unique characteristics. Thus it is
important to know about the composition, soil type, structure and texture of the soil
from where the microorganisms are isolated for research purpose and for the production
of metabolites, such as antibiotics.
Microbial species adapt to caves by interacting with minerals there (Barton and Jurado,
2007). The Geochemistry and metal analysis of the cave environment can influence the
synthesis of antibiotics by cave bacteria, as metal ions are known to affect the synthesis
of microbial metabolites in vitro. Tanaka, et al., (2010) made a connection between rare
earth elements, scandium and/or lanthanum, and increased activation of the expression
of nine genes belonging to nine secondary metabolite–biosynthetic gene clusters of
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Investigations on the effect of several metal ions
indicated that Cu2+, Mn2+ and Fe2+ stimulated AK-111-81 biosynthesis by Streptomyces
hygroscopicus, depending on their concentration (Gesheva et al., 2005). Divalent ions
stimulated the production of polyenes (Georgieva-Borisova, 1974; Liu et al., 1975;
Solivery et al., 1988; Park et al., 1998) and Fe2+ and Mn2+have been found to favour
niphimycin production. Soil texture and structure also strongly influence the activity of
soil biota. For example, medium-textured loam and clay soils enhance activity of
microbes and earthworms, whereas fine textured sandy soils, with lower water retention
potentials, are not very favorable. Alterations in pH of the soil can affect metabolism
of species, enzyme activity and availability of nutrients, and thus are often lethal (Singh
and Mishra, 2013).
The aim of the present study was to isolate microbes from the cave having antibacterial
activity and characterization of the producer as well as the product and geochemistry
of the cave, in order to understand the environmental conditions under which these
microorganisms are living and producing compounds inhibitory for other microbes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sampling site and collection of soil samples
Soil samples were collected from Kashmir smast (cave) (‘smast’ in local language
means cave), Nanser, Buner, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (GPS coordinates 34o25’42.12”N
72o13’10.82”E) (Fig. 3.1.1). The cave is 188 m long, with average height and width
~28 m and ~25 m, respectively. The Kashmir smast is a series of natural limestone
caves (probably of marine origin), most part is of stalagmite, located in the Babozai
Mountains in between Mardan and Buner in Northern Pakistan. According to study on
a rare series of bronze coins and artifacts found in the region, the caves and their
adjacent valley probably comprised a sovereign kingdom in Gandhara which
maintained at least partial independence for almost 500 years, from 4 th century AD to
the 9th century AD (Ziad, 2006). It is a limestone cave, with internal temperature around
10oC, having pH of 5 and the internal surface of cave was muddy due to dripping of
water from the top. The only source of water was drip water. Two soil samples were
collected from wall and ground surface of the cave in sterile Falcon tube under aseptic
conditions. The sample was collected from the dark end of the cave about 188 m from
entrance. This cave is located far away from human access so human intervention is
negligible. The samples were then brought to the laboratory in an ice box and stored at
4°C for further processing. These soil samples were screened for the antibiotic
producing isolates within 24 hours.
Mineralogical Analysis
Soil Analysis by Atomic Absorption
For the quantitative analysis of elements (Ni, Cr, Co, Cu, Zn and Pb) in the soil sample,
Atomic Absorption (AA240FS Fast Sequential Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer)
spectrophotometry was performed. To prepare the sample for this analysis, soil
digestion was performed.
Fig. 3.1.1. Kashmir cave (smast), Nanseer Buner, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
White arrows show location of the cave, black arrow shows entrance to the cave.
(Pakistan full map from: http://www.mapsofworld.com/pakistan/; site map:
google Earth)
Sample preparation for mineralogical analysis
1 g of cave and control soil (outside cave used as a control) each were ground
separately, to make it more fine and were then mixed in 15 ml aqua regia, and was
heated at 150°C and left overnight, then 5 ml of HClO4 was added and again heated at
150°C. The solution almost became dry until brown fumes were produced. Whatman
filter paper (No. 42) was used for filtration and the volume was made up to 50 ml using
double distilled water (FAO/SIDA, 1983).
XRD (X-ray diffraction spectroscopy)
X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) is a rapid analytical technique used for phase
identification and characterization of unknown crystalline materials (e.g. minerals,
inorganic compounds) and identification of fine-grained minerals such as clays and
mixed layer clays that are difficult to determine optically (Geochemical Instrumentation
and Analysis). XRD patterns were obtained from the samples using (X’Pert-APD
Philips, The Netherlands) with an X-ray generator (3 kW) and anode (LFF Cu). The Cu
Kα radiation was administered at a wavelength of 1.54 Å. The X-ray generator tension
and current were 40 kV and 30 mA, respectively. The step-scan data were continuously
collected over the range of 5 to 80°2θ.
Quantitative Analysis
Mineral proportions were calculated using SIROQUANT, a commercially available
MS-Windows program for standardless mineral quantification. Weight percent mineral
phase contents were estimated. Using calculated hkl mineral library files, refinement
stages were optimized for the smallest possible χ2 goodness-of-fit parameter for the
associated Rietveld peak pattern match (Taylor, 1991; Taylor and Clapp, 1993).
Thermogravimetirc Analysis (TGA)
Thermogravimetric (TGA) analysis determines weight loss due to heating, cooling,
records change in mass from dehydration, decomposition, and oxidation of a sample
with time and temperature (Voitovich et al, 1994). TGA was performed on Setaram
TGA. Instruments incorporated high-resolution thermogravimetric analyser (series
Q500) in a flowing nitrogen atmosphere (60 cm3 min–1). Approximately, 35 mg of
sample underwent thermal analysis, with a heating rate of 5°C/min, within the range of
from 25 to 1000°C. With the isothermal, isobaric heating program of the instrument the
furnace temperature was regulated precisely to provide a uniform rate of decomposition
in the main decomposition stage.
FE-SEM and EDS (Field Emission-Scanning electron microscopy with Energy-
dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis)
Field-emission cathode in the electron gun of a scanning electron microscope provides
narrower probing beams at low as well as high electron energy, that results in improved
spatial resolution and minimized sample charging and damage (Stranks et al., 1970).
FE- SEM with EDS analysis of the samples were performed for the determination of
thickness, structure uniformity and elemental composition measurement, using S-4800
and EDX-350 (Horiba) FE-SEM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Samples were spread on a
glass plate that was fixed onto a brass holder, and coated with osmium tetraoxide
(OsO4) using a VD HPC-ISW osmium coater (Tokyo, Japan) prior to FE-SEM analysis.
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
About 2 mg of the soil sample was mixed with 40 mg of KBr in ratio 1: 20 using mortar
and pestle. KBr powder was dried at 120oC in an oven to avoid the broad spectral peak.
A 1X 13 mm pellet was prepared. The pellet was placed in a holder and introduced in
the infrared beam for analysis through Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (Jasco
FT/ IR – 620).
Microbiological Studies
Total viable heterotrophic bacteria (CFU/ml)
For isolation of bacteria from the cave soil, 1 g of sample was serially diluted in normal
saline and then was spread on Nutrient agar plates aseptically, and plates were
incubated for 24 hrs, aerobically at 35°C. Viable cell count was calculated as CFU/ml.
The isolate KC2-MRL was incubated at 25, 35 and 45°C and the growth (O.D at 600
nm). A growth curve was constructed by taking values of cell concentration on y-axis
versus time along x-axis. Using a standard formula, growth rate and generation time
was calculated from the graph.
Screening and isolation of antibacterial compound producing bacteria
Nutrient agar medium was used for isolation of antibiotic producing bacteria. Lawns of
susceptible test organisms i.e. Micrococcus luteus (ATCC 10240), Klebsiella sp.,
Pseudomonas sp. and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538), were made on nutrient
agar plates (Gauthier, 1976), which were then sprinkled with 20-25 particles of soil. All
the plates were gently shaken so that the soil particles spread uniformly. Plates were
then incubated at 35°C for 24 hours, lid side up, so that the soil particles do not fall off
the agar. After 24 hours of incubation, plates were checked for antibacterial activity by
the formation of clear zone of inhibition around bacterial (KC2-MRL) colony. Zone
producing isolates were purified and stored at 4°C.
Morphological and biochemical characterization of bacterial isolates
Colony morphology, Gram’s staining and biochemical tests (citrate utilization, oxidase
and catalase production, nitrate and sulfate reduction, H2S production and carbohydrate
fermentation) were performed according to Bergey’s Manual of Determinative
Bacteriology (Holt et al., 2012).
Molecular identification of the selected isolates
The DNA extraction from bacteria was done by spinning 1 mL of culture at 10,000 rpm
for about 3 min, the cells were pelleted out and rinsed twice in 400 µL TE buffer after
removing the supernatant. Then the cells were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 3 min, the
pellets were resuspended in 200 µL TE buffer. Then 100 µL Tris-saturated phenols of
pH 8.0 were added to these tubes, followed by a vortex-mixing step of 60 sec, to lyse
the cells. To remove the aqueous phase from organic phase, the samples were
centrifuged at 13,000 rpm at 4°C for 5 minutes. Then 160 μL of upper aqueous phase
was taken in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf. About 40 µL of TE buffer was added to make 200
µL and mixed with 100 µL of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1) and centrifuged for
5 min at 13,000 rpm at 4°C. Chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1) extraction was used
for the purification of lysate, when there was no longer a white interface, and the same
method was repeated twice or thrice (Aitken, 2012). Purified DNA was present in the
aqueous phase and was stored at -20°C for further use. The purified DNA was analyzed
through agarose gel 1.5 g in 1x TBE, and staining with ethidium bromide.
Phylogenetic analysis
Phylogenetic analysis was performed through ClustalW program implemented in
MEGA4.0 (Thompson et al., 1994). The similar sequences were downloaded from
NCBI. All sequences were aligned and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using
Neighbor Joining method in MEGA4.0 bootstrap analysis 1000 replicate, was
performed for the significance of the generated tree.
Production of antibacterial compounds by B. licheniformis KC2-MRL
Inoculum of B. licheniformis KC2-MRLwas selected after screening, on the basis of
larger zone of inhibition against test strains,was prepared in nutrient broth. About 50
ml of nutrient broth was prepared in 250 ml flask and autoclaved and incubated at 35°C
overnight to check the sterility and inoculated with the producer strain, and incubated
at 35°C for 24 hours in orbital shaker at 150 rpm. Sterilized nutrient broth (50 ml) was
taken in 100 ml flasks and pH was adjusted to 5 (pH of sampling site was 5).
Approximately, 10% inoculum was added in each flask and incubated at 35°C in orbital
shaker at 150 rpm. After every 24 hrs, samples were collected (centrifuged at 10,000
rpm for 16 minutes), for a total of 96 hrs to obtain cell free supernatant (CFS). The CFS
was checked for antibacterial activity by agar well diffusion assay.
Agar well diffusion assay
The production of antimicrobial metabolites by B. licheniformis KC2-MRL, was
checked by agar well diffusion method (Sen et al., 1995). About 80 l of CFS was
added in the wells and the plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 hours. After 24 hrs, the
zones of inhibition were observed and the diameter of the zone of inhibition (mm) was
measured.
Effect of medium, pH, temperature and incubation on the antibacterial activity
Different media used for the production of antibacterial compounds by B. licheniformis
KC2-MRL, including Trypticase soya broth (TSB), nutrient broth (NB) and Luria
Bertani (LB) broth. Inoculum (10%) was added and incubated at 37°C and at 150 rpm.
The cell growth was measured by optical density at 600 nm and antimicrobial activity
was checked by agar well diffusion assay.
To check the effect of time of incubation on the antimicrobial activity, the strain was
incubated at 37°C in orbital shaker at 150 rpm and samples were drawn after every 24
hours from 0 to 96 hours. The antimicrobial activity of all the collected CFS was
checked against S. aureus, M. luteus, Klebsiella sp. and E. coli.
Effect of temperature (15, 25, 35 and 45ºC) on optimum antibacterial activity was
studied by inoculating B. licheniformis KC2-MRL in Nutrient broth and incubated at
15, 25, 35 and 45°C at 150 rpm. Samples were drawn 24 hourly from 0- 96 hrs.
Centrifuged and CFS were used for further analysis using S. aureus, M. luteus,
Klebsiella sp. and Pseudomonas sp. as test strains.
Effect of pH (5, 6, 7 and 8) on the production of antibiotics was studied by inoculating
B. licheniformis KC2-MRL in the growth medium having different pH. Samples were
drawn from 0 to 96 hours after every 24 hours, centrifuged and cell free supernatants
were used for further analysis.
Antibiotic susceptibility test
Antibiotic susceptibility test was performed to check the sensitivity of the selected
strain against various broad spectrum antibiotics, to check for the intrinsic ability of
microorganisms to resist antibiotics.
Partial purification and FTIR of the antibacterial compound
Cell free supernatant of B. licheniformis KC2-MRL culture grown under optimized
conditions was used for the precipitation of antibacterial compounds using increasing
concentrations (10- 80%) of ammonium sulfate. The pellet was kept at - 20°C in 10 ml
of 0.1M phosphate buffer, pH 7.
FTIR was performed to identify unknown compounds. Spectrum of the antibacterial
compound, produced by Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL was compared with that of
bacitracin as a control. Samples were scanned from 4000-400 cm-1 at resolution of 6.0
cm-1.
RESULTS
Mineralogical Analysis
Experimental X-ray pattern of smast-5 and smast-7 along with the ICSD (Inorganic
Crystal Structure Database) reference code data of different crystals is shown in Fig.
3.1.2a and 3.1.2b. In Fig. 3.1.2a, the reflections of two prominent peaks at 2θ 26.624
and 29.420 were observed. The observed X-ray patterns match with the ICSD
Reference codes 03-065-0466 Quartz and 01-086-1385 Muscovite-2M1. The observed
fractions refer to Quartz and Muscovite- 2M1 crystalline fractions. Along with these
peaks, some other weak peaks also matched with reference peaks of 01-075-8291
chlorite-ll-4,01-080-1108 Biotite, 01-075-1656 Dolomite, 01-077-0022 Vermiculite-
2M, and 01-075-8291 clinochlore-llb-4. Fig. 3.1.2b indicates three prominent peaks at
2θ 26.661, 29.442 and 30.984. The observed fractions matched with ICSD Reference
codes 01-087-2096 Quartz, 01-072-4582 Calcite and 01-076-6603 Vermiculite. Silicate
minerals found in smast were illite, muscovite, vermiculite, chlorite, clinochlore and
quartz. The chemical composition of the minerals is given in (Table 3.1.1).
Fig. 3.1.2. XRD patterns of Kashmir smast (a) from the floor and (b) from the
wall along-with the matched peaks of the mineral ICSD (Inorganic Crystal
Structure Database)
Table 3.1.1. List of minerals obtained from smast-5 floor and smast-7 wall of
Kashmir smast samples
Table 3.1.2. Concentration of elements in sample collected from cave floor and
outside cave soil (control)
Soil samples Metals (mg/kg)
Ni Cr Co Cu Zn Ca Mg Pb
Cave soil 0.965 0.571 0.266 1.824 12.7311 332.938 1.2576 1.31
Control soil 10.4 8.74 0.810 4.7 36.41 121.65 1.023 8.14
Weight percent mineral phases were used to estimate the SIROQUANT (Fig. 3.1.3)
considering 100% crystalline compound to calculate the quantitative analysis. Fig.
3.1.3(a) shows that the vermiculite, illite and chlorite were the most abundant minerals
in smast-5. Similarly, Fig. 3.1.3(b) shows that the vermiculite-2M1, muscovite,
clinochlore-llb are the most abundant minerals in smast-7.
The FTIR absorption peaks from smast were observed to determine the major and minor
constituent minerals present in the sample smast-7 (Fig. 3.1.4). The samples analyzed
were mixtures of the minerals such as, silicon oxide, calcite, quartz, muscovite,
clinochlore, nimite, biotite and vermiculite. Various peaks appeared indicating the
presence of a variety of minerals.
Mass loss steps were observed from Fig. 5 at 77, 200 and 280, 400 and 790°C with mass
losses of 10.23, 21.55, 5.20 and 7.58% recorded due to carbonates.
SEM observations (Fig. 3.1.6) suggest that smast (cave) clay particles show poorly
crystallized clasts with angula, irregular outlines, swirly texture with face-to-face
arrangement of clay grains. Si, Al, Fe were found enriched within the samples.
Fig. 3.1.3. Quantitative analysis of minerals, A. Wall soil sample smast-7, B.
Floor soil sample smast-5
Fig. 3.1.4. Infrared spectra of Smast-7 wall
Soil Analysis
Atomic absorption spectroscopy was performed to determine the concentration of
elements in the cave soil sample. Ca was 332.938 mg/kg as compared to 121.65 mg/kg
in control soil, Mg was 1.2576 mg/kg in cave soil and 1.023 mg/kg in control soil and
that of Ni, Cr, Co, Cu, Zn and Pb were much lower than those found in the control soil
(Table 3.1.2).
Fig. 3.1.5. TGA (Thermogravimetric Analysis) plots of Kashmir smast (sample-5
Floor and sample-7 wall)
Microbiology Results
Colony Forming Unit (CFU/ml)
Numbers of viable cells per ml were calculated in floor brown soil sample collected
from Kashmir cave. The bacterial counts (CFU/ml) were calculated as 5.25 x 104/ml.
Screening of bacterial isolates for the antibacterial activity
Initial screening resulted in isolation of phenotypically different 4 bacterial strains
showing antimicrobial activity (Fig. 3.1.7) against four test organisms. Out of 4, the
strain B. licheniformis KC2-MRL showed maximum zone of inhibition (28 mm against
Micrococcus, 20 mm against E. coli, 14 mm against Staphylococcus aureus and 15 mm
against Klebsiella). Therefore, it was selected for further analysis on the basis of
greatest zone of inhibition.
Fig. 3.1.6. FE-SEM micrograph & EDS spectra of (a) smast-7 wall and (b) smast-
5 floor
Identification of antibiotic producing isolates
The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the antibiotic producing cave bacteria have been
submitted to NCBI GenBank. The isolates KC1-MRL, KC2-MRL, KC3-MRL and
KC4-MRL were identified as Serratia sp. KC1-MRL (Accession No. KC128829.1),
Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL (Accession No. KC128830.1), Bacillus sp. KC3-
MRL (Accession No. KC128831.1) and Stenotrophomonas sp. KC4-MRL (Accession
No. KC128832.1) (Fig 3.1.8a and 3.1.8b). Among these isolates the strain KC2-MRL,
identified as Bacillus licheniformis, showed maximum zone of inhibition (28 mm)
against Gram positive Micrococcus luteus.
Growth curve
At 25˚C and 35˚C Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL confirmed late growth as compared
to 45˚C with an elongated lag phase and a rise in growth. While, at 45˚C rise in growth
was detected.
Fig.3.1.7. Nutrient agar plate showing the zones of inhibition against the clinical
isolates
Selection of medium
Maximum antimicrobial activity was found in Nutrient Broth (NB) medium. The best
antibacterial activity was observed in case of NB after 24 hours of incubation, with zone
of inhibition of 28 mm against M. luteus, 20 mm against S. aureus, 11 mm against
Klebsiella and 8 mm against E. coli. With the passage of time, decrease in antimicrobial
activity was noted with the increase in growth. The antibacterial activity decreased with
passage of time in all media except the NB, i.e. after 48 hrs, 42, 28, 23 and 16 mm zone
of inhibition was observed against M. luteus, S. aureus, Klebsiella and E. coli,
respectively.
External Factors (incubation time, pH and temperature)
Best antimicrobial activity (42 mm) of B. licheniformis KC2-MRL was observed
against M. luteus, 28 mm against S. aureus, 23 mm against Klebsiella, 16 mm against
E. coli after 48 hours of incubation, while there was a decrease in the size of zone after
48 hours of incubation (Fig. 3.1.9). With passage of time, gradual decrease in
antimicrobial activity of B. licheniformis KC2-MRL was observed against M. luteus, S.
aureus, Klebsiella and E. coli (Fig. 3.1.9).
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849582)
Steno.maltophilia-Blg(AY040357)
Uncul bact-Finland(FM873444)
Uncul bact-Finland(FM873497)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849359)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849526)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849584)
Uncultured bacterium-USA(FJ849590)
Uncl bact-USA(FJ849628)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB525389)
Serratia.sp-Ch(JN859196)
B.licheniformis-Spn(AY479984)
B.licheniformis-Irn(FN678352)
B.licheniformis-Mex(HQ634209)
Bacillus.sp-Chn(EF026995)
Uncul bact-Spn(HQ218495)
Serratia.sp-Fr(GQ416051)
Serratia.sp-Fr(GQ416052)
Serratia.sp-Russ(JF327457)
Bacillus.sp-Bglm(HE586339)
S.proteamaculans-USA(HQ219941)
S.proteamaculans-USA(HQ219942)
S.rhizophila-Chn(GQ359325)
Uncul bact-UK(FJ184322)
S.rhizophila-Chn(GU391467)
S.liquefaciens-Ch(HQ334999)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309228)
Serratia.sp-USA(JN423857)
S.liquefaciens-USA(NR 042062)
S.rhizophila-Chn(FJ529915)
B.licheniformis-Fr(FN666245)
Stenotrophomonas rhizophila-Fr(JF711015)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397495)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397507)(2)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397507)
Serratia.sp-Ch(JF833851)
S.liquefaciens-Ind(JN596115)
B.licheniformis-Itl(HE590856)
Stenotrophomonas sp-Chn(AJ551165)
S.liquefaciens-Ch(HQ335000)
Serratia.sp-Blgm(JN106438)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397509)
SN2-Pak-2012
Stenotrophomonas sp-Chn(GU391493)
B.licheniformis-Russ(AF276309)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB680251)
Bacillus.sp-Korea(GQ407180)
Serratia.sp-Twn(EF153429)
S.proteamaculans-Ger(NR 037112)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397489)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397503)
B.licheniformis-USA(EU718490)
Serratia.sp-Atlantic Ocean(FR744821)
S.liquefaciens-Ch(HQ335001)
S.proteamaculans-Russ(JF327454)
SN1.pak. 2011
Stenotrophomonas sp-Arg(DQ109991)
SN4-Pak(2012)
B.licheniformis-Irn(DQ228696)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397484)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397485)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397486)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JN118574)
B.licheniformis-Pol(JN180125)
B.licheniformis-Mex(HQ634208)
B.licheniformis-USA(AF372616)
S.rhizophila-Ind(FM955853)
Serratia.sp-Moroco(JF974140)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309230)
Serratia.sp-Ch(HQ334998)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397487)
Bacillus.sp-Fr(EF471917)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JF700488)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JF700489)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JF414759)
S.proteamaculans-USA(HQ219940)
S.grimesii-Ch(HQ242737)
Serratia.sp-Ch(JN886902)
Uncultured.bact-Ch(JF697434)
Serratia.sp-Itlay(HQ588852)
Serratia.sp-Italy(HQ588837)
Serratia.sp-Itlay(HQ588839)
S.liquefaciens-NBRC12979-Jpn(AB680356)
S.grimesii-NBRC13537-Jpn(AB680428)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM055609)
B.licheniformis-S.Af(EU870503)
P.carotovorum-Spn(HQ326803)
B.licheniformis-Spn(AF397062)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB680253)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB680252)
B.licheniformis-Chn(DQ351932)
Bacillus.sp-Spn(FR823409)
Bacillus.sp-Jpn(AB425348)
SN3-Pak(2012)
Bacterium.FJAT-Chn(JN411103)
B.licheniformis-Hol(GQ340506)
Serratia.sp-Ch(HQ335002)
Stenotrophomonas sp-Fr(HQ670711)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309229)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309229)(2)
Bacillus.sp-Jpn(AB188216)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM006901)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM006899)
B.licheniformis-Ind(EF059752)
B.licheniformis-Twn(DQ993676)
Bacillus.sp-Chn(JQ068114)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM006898)
Bacillus.sp-Ch(HE574482)
S.proteamaculans-Russ(JF327473)
Bacillus.sp-Ch(JF772468)
Uncultured Bacillus.sp-Chn(JN377797)
Uncult.bacillus-Chn(JN377799)
Bacillus.sp-Fr(EU362149)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849582)
Steno.maltophilia-Blg(AY040357)
Uncul bact-Finland(FM873444)
Uncul bact-Finland(FM873497)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849359)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849526)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849584)
Uncultured bacterium-USA(FJ849590)
Uncl bact-USA(FJ849628)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB525389)
Serratia.sp-Ch(JN859196)
B.licheniformis-Spn(AY479984)
B.licheniformis-Irn(FN678352)
B.licheniformis-Mex(HQ634209)
Bacillus.sp-Chn(EF026995)
Uncul bact-Spn(HQ218495)
Serratia.sp-Fr(GQ416051)
Serratia.sp-Fr(GQ416052)
Serratia.sp-Russ(JF327457)
Bacillus.sp-Bglm(HE586339)
S.proteamaculans-USA(HQ219941)
S.proteamaculans-USA(HQ219942)
S.rhizophila-Chn(GQ359325)
Uncul bact-UK(FJ184322)
S.rhizophila-Chn(GU391467)
S.liquefaciens-Ch(HQ334999)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309228)
Serratia.sp-USA(JN423857)
S.liquefaciens-USA(NR 042062)
S.rhizophila-Chn(FJ529915)
B.licheniformis-Fr(FN666245)
Stenotrophomonas rhizophila-Fr(JF711015)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397495)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397507)(2)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397507)
Serratia.sp-Ch(JF833851)
S.liquefaciens-Ind(JN596115)
B.licheniformis-Itl(HE590856)
Stenotrophomonas sp-Chn(AJ551165)
S.liquefaciens-Ch(HQ335000)
Serratia.sp-Blgm(JN106438)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397509)
SN2-Pak-2012
Stenotrophomonas sp-Chn(GU391493)
B.licheniformis-Russ(AF276309)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB680251)
Bacillus.sp-Korea(GQ407180)
Serratia.sp-Twn(EF153429)
S.proteamaculans-Ger(NR 037112)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397489)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397503)
B.licheniformis-USA(EU718490)
Serratia.sp-Atlantic Ocean(FR744821)
S.liquefaciens-Ch(HQ335001)
S.proteamaculans-Russ(JF327454)
SN1.pak. 2011
Stenotrophomonas sp-Arg(DQ109991)
SN4-Pak(2012)
B.licheniformis-Irn(DQ228696)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397484)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397485)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397486)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JN118574)
B.licheniformis-Pol(JN180125)
B.licheniformis-Mex(HQ634208)
B.licheniformis-USA(AF372616)
S.rhizophila-Ind(FM955853)
Serratia.sp-Moroco(JF974140)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309230)
Serratia.sp-Ch(HQ334998)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397487)
Bacillus.sp-Fr(EF471917)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JF700488)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JF700489)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JF414759)
S.proteamaculans-USA(HQ219940)
S.grimesii-Ch(HQ242737)
Serratia.sp-Ch(JN886902)
Uncultured.bact-Ch(JF697434)
Serratia.sp-Itlay(HQ588852)
Serratia.sp-Italy(HQ588837)
Serratia.sp-Itlay(HQ588839)
S.liquefaciens-NBRC12979-Jpn(AB680356)
S.grimesii-NBRC13537-Jpn(AB680428)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM055609)
B.licheniformis-S.Af(EU870503)
P.carotovorum-Spn(HQ326803)
B.licheniformis-Spn(AF397062)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB680253)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB680252)
B.licheniformis-Chn(DQ351932)
Bacillus.sp-Spn(FR823409)
Bacillus.sp-Jpn(AB425348)
SN3-Pak(2012)
Bacterium.FJAT-Chn(JN411103)
B.licheniformis-Hol(GQ340506)
Serratia.sp-Ch(HQ335002)
Stenotrophomonas sp-Fr(HQ670711)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309229)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309229)(2)
Bacillus.sp-Jpn(AB188216)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM006901)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM006899)
B.licheniformis-Ind(EF059752)
B.licheniformis-Twn(DQ993676)
Bacillus.sp-Chn(JQ068114)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM006898)
Bacillus.sp-Ch(HE574482)
S.proteamaculans-Russ(JF327473)
Bacillus.sp-Ch(JF772468)
Uncultured Bacillus.sp-Chn(JN377797)
Uncult.bacillus-Chn(JN377799)
Bacillus.sp-Fr(EU362149)
Cluster I
Fig. 3.1.8. Phylogenetic tree of all four species with related sequences in NCBI
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849582)
Steno.maltophilia-Blg(AY040357)
Uncul bact-Finland(FM873444)
Uncul bact-Finland(FM873497)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849359)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849526)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849584)
Uncultured bacterium-USA(FJ849590)
Uncl bact-USA(FJ849628)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB525389)
Serratia.sp-Ch(JN859196)
B.licheniformis-Spn(AY479984)
B.licheniformis-Irn(FN678352)
B.licheniformis-Mex(HQ634209)
Bacillus.sp-Chn(EF026995)
Uncul bact-Spn(HQ218495)
Serratia.sp-Fr(GQ416051)
Serratia.sp-Fr(GQ416052)
Serratia.sp-Russ(JF327457)
Bacillus.sp-Bglm(HE586339)
S.proteamaculans-USA(HQ219941)
S.proteamaculans-USA(HQ219942)
S.rhizophila-Chn(GQ359325)
Uncul bact-UK(FJ184322)
S.rhizophila-Chn(GU391467)
S.liquefaciens-Ch(HQ334999)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309228)
Serratia.sp-USA(JN423857)
S.liquefaciens-USA(NR 042062)
S.rhizophila-Chn(FJ529915)
B.licheniformis-Fr(FN666245)
Stenotrophomonas rhizophila-Fr(JF711015)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397495)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397507)(2)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397507)
Serratia.sp-Ch(JF833851)
S.liquefaciens-Ind(JN596115)
B.licheniformis-Itl(HE590856)
Stenotrophomonas sp-Chn(AJ551165)
S.liquefaciens-Ch(HQ335000)
Serratia.sp-Blgm(JN106438)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397509)
SN2-Pak-2012
Stenotrophomonas sp-Chn(GU391493)
B.licheniformis-Russ(AF276309)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB680251)
Bacillus.sp-Korea(GQ407180)
Serratia.sp-Twn(EF153429)
S.proteamaculans-Ger(NR 037112)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397489)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397503)
B.licheniformis-USA(EU718490)
Serratia.sp-Atlantic Ocean(FR744821)
S.liquefaciens-Ch(HQ335001)
S.proteamaculans-Russ(JF327454)
SN1.pak. 2011
Stenotrophomonas sp-Arg(DQ109991)
SN4-Pak(2012)
B.licheniformis-Irn(DQ228696)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397484)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397485)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397486)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JN118574)
B.licheniformis-Pol(JN180125)
B.licheniformis-Mex(HQ634208)
B.licheniformis-USA(AF372616)
S.rhizophila-Ind(FM955853)
Serratia.sp-Moroco(JF974140)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309230)
Serratia.sp-Ch(HQ334998)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397487)
Bacillus.sp-Fr(EF471917)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JF700488)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JF700489)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JF414759)
S.proteamaculans-USA(HQ219940)
S.grimesii-Ch(HQ242737)
Serratia.sp-Ch(JN886902)
Uncultured.bact-Ch(JF697434)
Serratia.sp-Itlay(HQ588852)
Serratia.sp-Italy(HQ588837)
Serratia.sp-Itlay(HQ588839)
S.liquefaciens-NBRC12979-Jpn(AB680356)
S.grimesii-NBRC13537-Jpn(AB680428)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM055609)
B.licheniformis-S.Af(EU870503)
P.carotovorum-Spn(HQ326803)
B.licheniformis-Spn(AF397062)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB680253)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB680252)
B.licheniformis-Chn(DQ351932)
Bacillus.sp-Spn(FR823409)
Bacillus.sp-Jpn(AB425348)
SN3-Pak(2012)
Bacterium.FJAT-Chn(JN411103)
B.licheniformis-Hol(GQ340506)
Serratia.sp-Ch(HQ335002)
Stenotrophomonas sp-Fr(HQ670711)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309229)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309229)(2)
Bacillus.sp-Jpn(AB188216)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM006901)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM006899)
B.licheniformis-Ind(EF059752)
B.licheniformis-Twn(DQ993676)
Bacillus.sp-Chn(JQ068114)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM006898)
Bacillus.sp-Ch(HE574482)
S.proteamaculans-Russ(JF327473)
Bacillus.sp-Ch(JF772468)
Uncultured Bacillus.sp-Chn(JN377797)
Uncult.bacillus-Chn(JN377799)
Bacillus.sp-Fr(EU362149)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849582)
Steno.maltophilia-Blg(AY040357)
Uncul bact-Finland(FM873444)
Uncul bact-Finland(FM873497)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849359)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849526)
Uncul bact-USA(FJ849584)
Uncultured bacterium-USA(FJ849590)
Uncl bact-USA(FJ849628)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB525389)
Serratia.sp-Ch(JN859196)
B.licheniformis-Spn(AY479984)
B.licheniformis-Irn(FN678352)
B.licheniformis-Mex(HQ634209)
Bacillus.sp-Chn(EF026995)
Uncul bact-Spn(HQ218495)
Serratia.sp-Fr(GQ416051)
Serratia.sp-Fr(GQ416052)
Serratia.sp-Russ(JF327457)
Bacillus.sp-Bglm(HE586339)
S.proteamaculans-USA(HQ219941)
S.proteamaculans-USA(HQ219942)
S.rhizophila-Chn(GQ359325)
Uncul bact-UK(FJ184322)
S.rhizophila-Chn(GU391467)
S.liquefaciens-Ch(HQ334999)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309228)
Serratia.sp-USA(JN423857)
S.liquefaciens-USA(NR 042062)
S.rhizophila-Chn(FJ529915)
B.licheniformis-Fr(FN666245)
Stenotrophomonas rhizophila-Fr(JF711015)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397495)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397507)(2)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397507)
Serratia.sp-Ch(JF833851)
S.liquefaciens-Ind(JN596115)
B.licheniformis-Itl(HE590856)
Stenotrophomonas sp-Chn(AJ551165)
S.liquefaciens-Ch(HQ335000)
Serratia.sp-Blgm(JN106438)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397509)
SN2-Pak-2012
Stenotrophomonas sp-Chn(GU391493)
B.licheniformis-Russ(AF276309)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB680251)
Bacillus.sp-Korea(GQ407180)
Serratia.sp-Twn(EF153429)
S.proteamaculans-Ger(NR 037112)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397489)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397503)
B.licheniformis-USA(EU718490)
Serratia.sp-Atlantic Ocean(FR744821)
S.liquefaciens-Ch(HQ335001)
S.proteamaculans-Russ(JF327454)
SN1.pak. 2011
Stenotrophomonas sp-Arg(DQ109991)
SN4-Pak(2012)
B.licheniformis-Irn(DQ228696)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397484)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397485)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397486)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JN118574)
B.licheniformis-Pol(JN180125)
B.licheniformis-Mex(HQ634208)
B.licheniformis-USA(AF372616)
S.rhizophila-Ind(FM955853)
Serratia.sp-Moroco(JF974140)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309230)
Serratia.sp-Ch(HQ334998)
B.licheniformis-UK(FN397487)
Bacillus.sp-Fr(EF471917)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JF700488)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JF700489)
B.licheniformis-Ind(JF414759)
S.proteamaculans-USA(HQ219940)
S.grimesii-Ch(HQ242737)
Serratia.sp-Ch(JN886902)
Uncultured.bact-Ch(JF697434)
Serratia.sp-Itlay(HQ588852)
Serratia.sp-Italy(HQ588837)
Serratia.sp-Itlay(HQ588839)
S.liquefaciens-NBRC12979-Jpn(AB680356)
S.grimesii-NBRC13537-Jpn(AB680428)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM055609)
B.licheniformis-S.Af(EU870503)
P.carotovorum-Spn(HQ326803)
B.licheniformis-Spn(AF397062)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB680253)
B.licheniformis-Jpn(AB680252)
B.licheniformis-Chn(DQ351932)
Bacillus.sp-Spn(FR823409)
Bacillus.sp-Jpn(AB425348)
SN3-Pak(2012)
Bacterium.FJAT-Chn(JN411103)
B.licheniformis-Hol(GQ340506)
Serratia.sp-Ch(HQ335002)
Stenotrophomonas sp-Fr(HQ670711)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309229)
Bacillus.sp-Brzl(JF309229)(2)
Bacillus.sp-Jpn(AB188216)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM006901)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM006899)
B.licheniformis-Ind(EF059752)
B.licheniformis-Twn(DQ993676)
Bacillus.sp-Chn(JQ068114)
B.licheniformis-Chn(HM006898)
Bacillus.sp-Ch(HE574482)
S.proteamaculans-Russ(JF327473)
Bacillus.sp-Ch(JF772468)
Uncultured Bacillus.sp-Chn(JN377797)
Uncult.bacillus-Chn(JN377799)
Bacillus.sp-Fr(EU362149)
Cluster II
The maximum antibacterial activity i.e. 22 mm and 28 mm was observed against
M. luteus and S. aureus, respectively, 17 mm against E. coli and no activity against
Klebsiella, at 35°C after 48 hrs of incubation with growth OD600 2.25. The activity in
terms of zone of inhibition decreased with increase in temperature and low activity was
observed at 45°C (OD600 0.306). After 72 hours of incubation, the zone of 9 mm was
observed against M. luteus, 10 mm against S. aureus, 6 mm against Klebsiella and no
activity against E. coli. The diameter of zone of inhibition gradually decreased with
time (Fig. 3.1.9).
Fig. 3.1.9. Effect of time of incubation, pH and temperature on the growth and
antimicrobial activity of B. licheniformis KC2-MRL against M. luteus, S. aureus,
Klebsiella and E. coli
Effect of pH (5, 6, 7 and 8) on the production of antibiotics was studied. Activity in
terms of zone of inhibition (mm) was measured against test organisms i.e. M. luteus,
Klebsiella, E. coli and S. aureus. At pH 5, the best activities as 23 mm against S. aureus,
followed by M. luteus, Klebsiella and E. coli, were observed after 24 hrs of incubation.
The second best activity was observed at pH 6, and the gradual decrease in activity was
observed with passage of time (Fig. 3.1.9).
Temperature and pH Stability
To check the stability of antimicrobial compounds at different temperatures, the cell
free supernatant (CFS) was treated at 15, 25, 35 and 45°C for 1 hour i.e. the antibacterial
activity (26 mm) was observed until 40°C but the activity decreased at a temperature
above 40°C and was totally lost with further rise in temperature.
The antimicrobial compound produced by B. licheniformis KC2-MRL was stable at
range pH 5-8. The highest activity was observed at pH 5 and 6, whereas, activity
decreased at pH 7 and 8.
B. licheniformis KC2-MRL produced optimum activity at acidic pH 5-6 after 24 hrs of
incubation. The antimicrobial activity was stable up to 45°C. It was found that
antimicrobial compounds were stable at range of 5 -7.
Antibiotic susceptibility test
Vancomycin, Nalidixic acid, Cefotoxime, Ampicillin, Amoxicillin, Imipenem,
Methicillin, Cefoten and Levofloxacin were tested to check the susceptibility of
Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL. The organism was more susceptible to Levofloxacin
by producing 40 mm zone of inhibition (Fig. 3.1.10).
Fig. 3.1.10. Zone of inhibition of our four antibiotic producing strains
(Serratia sp. KC1-MRL, Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL, Bacillus sp. KC3-MRL
and Stenotrophomonas sp. KC4-MRL) against selected antibiotics in mm
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
KC1 KC2 KC3 KC4
VA30
NA30
CTX30
Amp25
Amc30
IPM10
Met5
CN10
LEV(5)
Zon
e o
f In
hib
itio
n (
mm
)
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic analysis of antibacterial compound
produced by B. licheniformis KC2-MRL
We used a solution of bacitracin as a standard. FTIR spectrum of B.
licheniformis KC2-MRL’s precipitated protein was compared with the spectrum of
control. FTIR spectrum of bacitracin showed the absorption bands at 3295.63, 3016.9,
2133.64, and 1635 cm-1 which were corresponding to NH, CH, C-C, and C=C groups.
Similarly, in case of B. licheniformis KC2-MRL protein the absorption bands appeared
at 3271.98, 3016.90, 2120.12, 1635.20 and 1076.22 cm-1 which were attributing to the
NH, CH, C=C and C-N (Fig. 3.1.11).
Fig. 3.1.11. Comparison of FTIR spectra of control (Bacitracin) and the
antibacterial compound produced by B. licheniformis KC2-MRL
DISCUSSION
Solution caves are formed in carbonate and sulfate rocks such as limestone, dolomite,
marble, and gypsum by the action of slowly moving ground water that dissolves the
rock to form tunnels, irregular passages, and even large caverns along joints and
bedding planes (Davies and Morgan, 2000). Caves usually have extremely starved
conditions, but still they contain diverse and often unique microbial communities
(Barton, 2007). Caves on other worlds such as Mars may provide protected sites for
extraterrestrial life forms (Nelson, 1996). Subsurface of Earth is considered as the the
best possible site to look for microbial life and the characteristic lithologies that
indicates the remnants of life. The subterrain, where surface conditions are hostile, like
Mars and subsurface offers habitat for signs of lifeforms (Boston et al., 2001).
Microbial analysis of caves showed Bacillus as the most commonly detected microbial
genus (Adetutu et al., 2012). It is important to understand how the ecosystems are
operating and accommodating microbial diversity. The rock composition and
mineralogy can be helpful to understand the geomicrobiology and potential metabolic
capabilities of the microorganisms to use ions within the rock as nutrients and for
chemolithotrophic energy production. Cave sediments can therefore act as reservoirs of
microorganisms (Adetutu et al., 2012). The use of these ions may be supported by the
formation of a corrosion residue, through microbial scavenging activities (Barton,
2007). Cave microorganisms also have potential to produce unique antibiotics and
cancer treatment drugs (Onaga, 2001). Minerals have profound effect on the production
of antibiotics by microorganisms. Basak and Majumdar (1975) reported that kanamycin
production by Streptomyces kanamyceticus ATCC 12853 required magnesium sulfate
and potassium phosphate (0.4 and 1.0 g/L, respectively), Fe and Zn (0.25 and 0.575
μg/ml, respectively), Mn and Ca did not have any effect, whereas, Cu, Co, Ni, and V
have inhibitory effect on growth and production of kanamycin. Divalent ions as Mn2+,
Cu2+, Fe2+ stimulated AK-111-81 antibiotic biosynthesis by Streptomyces
hygroscopicus 111-81 (Gesheva et al., 2005). The divalent metal ions (Mg, Fe and Mn)
sodium dihydrogen phosphate were found essential for bacitracin production by
Bacillus licheniformis, whereas Na2SO4 and CaCl2 decreased the bacitracin yield
(Yousaf, 1997).
The sample from which B. licheniformis KC2-MRL was isolated, was reddish- brown
in colour. Brown soils are usually low in organic matter. The red- brownish red soil is
heavy and clay-rich (silty-clay to clayey) soil, strongly reddish, developed on limestone
or dolomite. Terra rossa derives is usually derived from the insoluble residue of the
underlying limestone. Following dissolution of calcium carbonate by rain, clay
contained in limestone sediments with other insoluble substances or rock fragments,
forming discontinuous residual layers variable in depth. Under oxidizing conditions
iron oxides appear, which produces the characteristic red color. According to this
theory, Terra rossa is usually derived a polygenetic relict soil, formed during the
Tertiary and subjected to hot and humid periods during the Quaternary (Jordán, 2014).
XRD-analysis of the smast confirmed the presence of clay minerals, carbonates,
silicates (Hill, 1999). Minerals are produced as a result of intense chemical weathering
on land under possibly tropical conditions, where abundant rainfall favored ionic
transfer and pedogenic development (Millot, 1970).
Carbonates found from Kashmir smast are predominantly calcite and traces of dolomite
(Vogel and Mylroie, 1990; Schwabe and Carew, 1993). Mostly, illite is found in fault
zones and also occurs as clay floor deposits (Hill, 1999). Illite is commonly present as
little-altered disintegrated particles (Weaver, 1989). Pedogenic clay minerals are
derived from moderate chemical weathering, which generally develop in poorly drained
tropical to subtropical areas of low relief, marked by flooding during humid seasons
and subsequent concentration of solutions in the soil during dry seasons. Al, Fe and Si
are transported by mean of water saturation during wet seasons, concentration for
mineral growth takes place during in dry seasons (Chamley, 1989). During
pedogenesis, chlorite transforms into kaolinite, and in intense weathering laterite soils
chlorite would be completely eliminated (Vicente and Elsass, 1997). The clay mineral
accumulation of illite, kaolinite, chlorite, dolomite and muscovite in smast are probably
indicative of changes in degree of weathering, and thus reflect the changes in climatic
conditions. The degree of weathering related to the presence of SiO, Al2O3 and show a
similar pattern to clay indices (Tardy and Nahon, 1985; Zhao and Yang, 1995). The
mineral assemblages investigated in smast are diverse.
The quantitative mineral analysis technique SIROQUANT described mineral
compositions of rocks, including clay mineral content. Thermal analysis offers an
important technique for the determination of thermal stability of minerals and roughly
estimating organic content of the samples. Importantly, the decomposition steps can be
obtained and mechanism of decomposition of the mineral is determined. Generally, the
theoretical mass loss of water is 10.46%, the structural disorganization upon thermal
treatment may occur in response to the loss of hydration water, which could provoke
collapse of the crystalline structure (Doak and Gallagher, 1965). The two overlapping
mass loss steps at 263 and 280°C are attributed to the hydroxyl group (Palmer and Frost,
2010). The higher mass loss at 280oC is believed to be due to the loss of both OH and
CO3. The broad mass loss at 485°C is ascribed to the loss of carbonate as carbon dioxide
(CO2) (Frost and Hales, 2009). The higher temperature mass loss at 828°C is attributed
to the Mg.
Clay particles were observed having poorly crystallized clasts with angula, irregular
outlines, swirly texture with face-to-face arrangement of clay grains, as also reported
by Manju and Nair (2001) in Madayi kaolin deposit, North Kerala, India. Generally,
intensive weathering of clay flakes show ragged edges, exhibit a rounded outline, or
bay-shaped edges, and poor lateral dimension, with a particularly small platy thickness.
Analysis shows that Si, Al, Fe were enriched within the samples, which probably are
the reflection of trapped minerals such as Quartz, feldspar, clay minerals and Fe-oxide
(Jeong and Kim, 2003).
FTIR analysis showed the peaks at 885 cm-1, 746 cm-1 and 715 cm-1 appeared because
of presence of dolomite (White, 1964; Marel and Beutelspacher, 1976). A wide band
around 1020 cm-1 is assigned to quartz SiO2 ( Russell, 1987; Ravisankar et al., 2012)
the peak at 1646 cm-1 is attributed to the bending vibration modes of water (Manoharan
and Venkatachalapathy, 2007). Peaks in the region of 2800-3000 cm-1 are ascribed to
the C-C stretching which is present in the form of organic matter in the mineral
contribution (Maritan and Mazzoli, 2005), and may be due to P-OH stretching bond
around 2845 cm-1 and 2935 cm-1. The sharp peak at 2513 cm-1 is due to the presence of
silicate minerals like (quartz, nimite, musciovite, vermiculite) (Vedder, 1964). The
appearance of broad band in the region of 3000 cm-1 to 3700 cm-1 is attributed to the
structural water present in the mineral (vermiculite) and due to the moisture present in
the sample (Zadrapa and Zykova, 2010). The hydroxyl and water-stretching region near
3200 cm-1 for most hydrated carbonates usually consists of one or two broad band
shifted somewhat to lower frequencies due to hydrogen bonding (Nakamoto, 2008;
Schrader, 2008), but the appearance of the broad band is due to the interpretation OH
and H2O group in the mineral in which some minerals were participating in hydrogen
bonding and some were not involved, i.e. non- hydrogen bonded Al-OH units (White,
1964; Marel and Beutelspacher, 1976).
Atomic absorption spectroscopy was performed to determine the concentrations of
elements; calcium, magnesium, chromium, cobalt, nickel, zinc, copper and lead incave
floor soil sample and it was found that the soil contained very high amount of calcium
as compared to the outside soil which was used as a control taken from above the cave.
Microbiology
Screening of bacterial isolates for the antibacterial activity
The biocapacity of bacteria inhabiting karstic caves to produce valuable biologically
active compounds is still not investigated much (Tomova et al., 2013). Soil is a natural
reservoir for microorganisms and their antimicrobial products (Dancer 2004). The four
selected strains isolated from cave soil were screened for the production of antibiotics
by using agar well diffusion assay against Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella, E. coli
and Micrococcus luteus. B. licheniformis KC2-MRL was selected for further analysis
on the basis of the greatest zone of inhibition. In the present study, B. licheniformis
KC2-MRL showed the best antimicrobial activity against M. luteus, followed by S.
aureus, Klebsiella and E. coli after 48 hrs of incubation.
Identification
Studies show that caves are inhabited by different types of microorganisms having
unique characteristics. Cave ecosystem has a deficiency of nutrients that is why
microorganisms present in the cave mostly compete for the nutrients and fight for
survival. Due to this ability of microbes, these microbes have the potential to produce
antibiotics against other microbes. There are nine different groups of bacteria reported
to be present in the caves i.e. Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes,
Chloroflexi, Bacteroidetes, Gemmatimonadetes, Nitrospirae, Actinobacteria and
Firmicutes (Zhou et al., 2007; Porttillo et al., 2008). Proteobacteria are the dominant
bacteria in cave which is about 45% (Zhou et al., 2007). The 16S rRNA gene sequences
of the antibiotic producing cave bacteria have been submitted to NCBI GenBank. The
isolates KC1-MRL, KC2-MRL, KC3-MRL and KC4-MRL were identified as Serratia
sp. KC1-MRL (Accession No. KC128829.1), Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL
(Accession No. KC128830.1), Bacillus sp. KC3-MRL (Accession No. KC128831.1)
and Stenotrophomonas sp. KC4-MRL (Accession No. KC128832.1). In Magura Cave,
Bulgaria, Tomonova et al. (2013) reported that Gram-positive bacteria were represented
by the genera Bacillus, Arthrobacter and Micrococcus.
Soil bacterial species, i.e. Bacillus, Streptomyces and Pseudomonas synthesize a high
proportion of agriculturally and medically important antibiotics (Yoshiko et al., 1998;
Sharga et al., 2004). Peptide antibiotics are the major group of antibiotics (Pinchuk et
al., 2002). Antibiotic producing microorganisms can be found in different habitats but
the majority are common inhabitants of soil. Caves contain abundant Actinobacteria,
which are valuable sources of novel antibiotics, replacing currently ineffective
antibiotics (Montano and Henderson, 2012). Molecular analysis of a sample from
Kashmir cave showed the presence of different bacterial strains.
Isolated strains were screened for the production of antimicrobial compounds by using
agar well diffusion assay. Ducluzeau et al. (1978) isolated Bacillus licheniformis that
was active against Clostridium perfringens or Lactobacillus sp. Muhammad et al.
(2009) also observed that Bacillus metabolites showed activity against M. luteus and S.
aureus. Bacitracin is a major polypeptide antibiotic produced by Bacillus licheniformis
and Bacillus subtilis, using M. luteus as a test organism (Vieira et al., 2011). B.
licheniformis isolated from marine sediments showed best antimicrobial activity
against pathogenic test strains; S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa (Eldewany et al.,
2011). The antibiotic production depends upon the composition of the medium, which
is required for cell biomass and for its maintenance (Stanbury et al., 1995). Maximum
activity was found when organism was grown in Nutrient broth. Similarly, Vieira et al.
(2011) used Nutrient broth for the growth of Bacillus licheniformis and incubated at
46ºC in a shaking incubator at 150 rpm. Whereas, Al- Janabi and Hussein (2006),
Yilmaz et al. (2006) and Al-Ajlani and Hasnain. (2010) also reported maximum
production of antimicrobial compound by Bacillus sp. in NB medium under varying
temperatures.
Effect of time of incubation, pH and temperature on antimicrobial activity
External factors can also affect the growth of microorganisms and the production of
antibiotics (Marwick et al., 1999), it has been reported that environmentalfactors such
as temperature, pH and incubation influence on antibiotic production (Iwai et al., 1973).
In our study, optimum temperature for antimicrobial compound production was
observed at 30-35°C. Berdy (1974) and Al-Gelawi et al. (2007) observed production of
bacitracin and other antibiotics by B. licheniformis (Zarei, 2012) at 37°C and also at
30°C (Eldewany et al., 2011) as well.
We found that our selected organism showed optimum activity at pH 5-6. Perlman and
Flickinger (1979) reported pH 6.5 for the optimum production of antibiotics by B.
licheniformis. Al-Gelawi et al. (2007) found maximum bacitracin production rate (192
units’ mL-1) at pH 7.5. The similar study was conducted in which antimicrobial activity
was best at the wide pH range of 6-8 by Bacillus sp. (Gulahmadov et al., 2006). Newly
emergent infectious diseases, re-emerging diseases and multidrug-resistant bacteria
mean that there is a persistent need to produce novel antimicrobial compounds (Uzair
et al., 2009).
We performed the antibiotic susceptibility test, in which the B. licheniformis KC2-MRL
was found resistant to cefotaxime (CTX) and was more susceptible to levofloxacin by
producing 40 mm zone of inhibition. B. thuringiensis RSKK 380 was reported to be
unaffected by cephazolin, cefoxitin and cefamandole (Yimaz et al., 2006).
Temperature and pH stability
Our results show that the antibacterial activity was stable up to 45°C. Similar study by
He et al. (2006), reported B. licheniformis to be stable at 25°C for 6 hrs and inactivated
above 40°C. However, in some cases the antimicrobial compounds retained its activity
even after autoclaving the sample at 121°C (Fontoura et al., 2009; Tabbene et al., 2009;
Uzair et al., 2009; Ebrahimipour et al., 2010). At the same time, sensitivity to different
pH was also evaluated in the present study and the antimicrobial compound was found
to be stable at pH 5-7. The similar study, in which antimicrobial activity was found to
be stable at pH range of 7 was reported by He et al. (2006). The stability of antibacterial
activity over a range of pH 7 and after heat treatment might be useful in several
industrial applications (Tabbene et al., 2009).
Our study showed best activity against M. luteus, S. aureus and E. coli after 48 hours
of incubation. A similar study by Aslim et al. (2002), who showed the maximum zone
of inhibition after 24-48 hrs.
Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL was further tested for antibiotic sensitivity by using
different antibiotics i.e. vancomycin, nalidixic acid, cefotoxime, ampicillin,
amoxicillin, imipenem, methicillin, cefoten and levofloxacin. It was found that the
selected strain was more susceptible to levofloxacin by producing 40 mm zone of
inhibition (Fig. 9).
Sirtori et al. (2006) reported clear absorption peaks at 3,500, 2,925, 1,639, and 1,546
cm-1 corresponding to the O-H, C-H, C-N and angular deformation of the N-H band.
Kong and Shaoning (2007) also detected bands at peaks of 3100, 1600-1690, 1480-
1575 and 1229-1301 cm-1 which are assigned to N-H, C=O, CN and NH. Kumar et al.
(2010) reported absorption bands at 1670, 1539, 1418 and 1488 cm-1 attributing to N-
H, C=O, O-H and CO.
Our study explored the ability of cave microorganisms to produce antibiotics and
characterization of the producer strain. Due to the internal acidic environment and high
calcium concentration in cave, B. licheniformis KC2-MRL grew better under acidic
conditions at temperatures higher than that in the cave. From our study it can be
concluded that caves of Pakistan have never been explored for the presence of bacteria
with regards to diversity or having ability to produce novel antimicrobial metabolites.
These metabolites as well as other caves can be further investigated to find some
bioactive compound with unique characteristic.
BIODEGRADATION OF POLYETHYLENE BY BACTERIAL STRAINS
ISOLATED FROM KASHMIR CAVE, BUNER, PAKISTAN
Abstract:
Low density polyethylene (LDPE) is used for making common shopping bags and plastic
sheets and is a significant source of environmental pollution. The present study was aimed
at testing the ability of bacterial strains identified as Serratia sp. KC1-MRL, Bacillus
licheniformis KC2-MRL, Bacillus sp. KC3-MRL and Stenotrophomonas sp. KC4-
MRL isolated from a limestone cave to degrade polyethylene. These strains were isolated
from soil of Kashmir Smast, a limestone cave in Buner, Pakistan. These strains showed
antibacterial activity against Micrococcus luteus, Klebsiella sp., Pseudomonas sp., and
Staphylococcus aureus. The pieces of LDPE plastic were incubated along with bacterial
strains for a period of one month and then analyzed. Degradation was observed in terms of
growth of microorganisms used in consortia, chemical changes in the composition of LDPE
by fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and changes in physical structure of LDPE by
scanning electron microscopy. Maximum growth (107×105 CFU/ml) at 28 °C and
subsequent change in chemical and physical properties of plastic were observed in the
presence of calcium and glucose. The cave-soil sample had a very high concentration of
calcium. The microscopy showed adherence of bacteria with lots of mechanical damage
and erosion on the surface of plastic films incubated with bacterial consortia. The
spectroscopy showed breakdown and formation of many compounds, as evident by the
appearance and disappearance of peaks in LDPE treated with bacterial consortia as
compared to the untreated control. We conclude that antibiotic-producing cave bacteria
were able to bring about physical and chemical changes in LDPE pieces and degradation
of LDPE was enhanced in media augmented with calcium.
INTRODUCTION
Plastics are polymers of carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen and that are synthetically
derived from petrochemicals and suitable for a wide range of usage. Since plastics are
artificially manufactured they are xenobiotic compounds, and they resist degradation
(Kawai, 2010).
Polyethylene is one of the most commonly used commercial plastics, found in various
products ranging from simple plastic bags to artificial limbs (Orhan and Büyükgüngör,
2000; Shimao, 2001). Thermal and mechanical stability and their morphologies make
polymeric substances one of the most popular commodity of the modern world (Rivard
et al., 1995). Plastic waste is an environmental hazard. Plastic debris poses a direct
threat to wildlife. The main dangers associated with plastic objects for most species are
related to entanglement and ingestion. Juvenile animals in particular often become
entangled in plastic debris, which can result in serious injury as the animal grows, not
to mention restriction of movement, preventing animals from properly feeding and, in
the case of mammals, breathing (Webb et al., 2012). Due to plastic’s resilience against
degradation and its proliferation in industry, the issue of plastic pollution has evolved
to become a threat to global ecology.
Management of plastic waste is an ever-increasing problem, and none of the current
techniques of solid-waste management completely alleviate all the concerns related to
these recalcitrant polymers (Nkwachukwu et al., 2013). One way to deal with these
polymers could be to alter the manufacturing process, and new formulations should be
developed with special considerations on mechanism for their biodegradation. These
alterations could include looking into factors that can aid in biodegradation like pH,
temperature, chemical structure, polymeric morphology, presence or absence of certain
additives, and, most importantly the type of organisms that can be involved (Gu and
Gu, 2005).
Degradation of plastics is carried out by organisms that are chemoheterotrophs. Many
studies have shown the presence of such bacteria in caves. Bacteria also have the ability
to utilize hydrocarbons as a source of energy. Studies have shown that a variety of
culturable chemoheterotrophs are present in micro-habitats of caves and catacombs (De
Leo et al., 2012). The microorganisms living under stressful or low-nutrient habitats
can develop the ability to use any available nutrient to survive. Studies on a bacterial
strain belonging to the Arthrobacter genus from alpine ice showed biodegradation of
phenol under various environmental conditions (Margesin et al., 2004). Bacteria
present in caves are capable of carrying out a variety of biodegradative and
biodeteriorative processes. Extensive studies have reported biodeteriorative effects of
microorganisms in cave environment (Cuezva et al., 2012; Schabereiter-Gurtner et al.,
2002).
Despite much study, the knowledge is very limited about microbial life in diverse and
extreme habitats like caves. There exists much potential for isolating and studying
microbes in caves that have unique and unexplored characteristics of potential
commercial applicability. These studies can also be helpful in investigating
evolutionary relationships of microorganisms in cave environment. Most caves are
characterized as having very low nutrient availability, constant low temperature, and
high humidity. Caves can either be terrestrial or aquatic. Some may be rich in specific
natural minerals or have exposure to nutrient sources, and therefore different caves will
have different types of microorganisms inhabiting various ecological niches (Zada et
al., 2016). Fauna, environmental factors, temperature, humidity, organic matter and
other environmental factors influence activities such as nutrient cycling, and
geomicrobiological activities including the formation or alteration of cave structures
(Adetutu and Ball, 2014). Cave organisms have evolved some extraordinary abilities to
survive and live in this inhospitable environment.
Polyethylene makes a significant contribution in solid waste in developed countries.
Management of this waste can be carried out by chemical, physical, and biological
methods. Various natural microflora of soil, including bacteria and fungi, are reported
to degrade low-density polyethylene (LDPE) under various physical and chemical
environments. This study determines the degradation capacity of four bacterial strains
isolated from Kashmir Smast, Khyber Pakhtoon Khwa, Pakistan. The bacteria isolated
were previously identified and tested positive for antibiotic production in the
Microbiology Research Laboratory (MRL), Department of Microbiology, Quaid-e-
Azam University, Islamabad. Since antibiotic production and LDPE degradation takes
place under stressed environmental conditions, it was hypothesized that bacteria
positive for the first character may also be positive for the other character. For this
purpose, commercially available LDPE from a shopping bag was used. Bacterial
isolates Serratia sp. KC1-MRL, Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL, Bacillus sp. KC3-
MRL, and Stenotrophomonas sp. KC4-MRL were used in consortia. The study was
carried out in six different medium compositions or modifications, and their individual
effects were analyzed by determining total viable cells, fourier-transform infrared
spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. Isolated bacteria were inoculated in
mineral salt medium, and sterilized LDPE pieces were added in the flasks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
SAMPLING SITE AND SAMPLE COLLECTION
Soil samples were collected from Kashmir Smast (cave), Nanser, Buner, Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa (GPS coordinates 34°25′42.12″N 72°13′10.82″E) (Fig. 3.2.1). The
Kashmir Smast is a series of natural limestone caves probably of marine origin (Khan,
2013). These caves are located in the Babozai Mountains between Mardan and Buner
in northern Pakistan. The only source of water was drip water. Two soil samples were
collected from wall and ground surfaces of the cave in sterile Falcon tubes under aseptic
conditions. Samples were collected from the dark end of the cave about 188 m from the
entrance. This cave is located far away from human access, so human intervention is
negligible (Zada et al., 2016). The samples were then brought to the laboratory in an
icebox and stored at 4 °C for further processing. The pH and temperature of soil was
recorded as 7.2 and 25 °C.
SOIL ANALYSIS BY ATOMIC ABSORPTION
For the quantitative analysis of elements in the soil sample, atomic-absorption
spectrophotometry was performed with a AA240FS Fast Sequential Atomic Absorption
Spectrophotometer. Soil digestion was performed to prepare samples for analysis. One
gram each of soil from the cave floor and control soil from outside the cave were ground
separately and were then mixed in 15 mL aqua regia, heated at 15 °C, and left overnight.
Then 5 mL of HClO4 was added and again heated at 150 °C. The solution almost became
dry before brown fumes were produced. Whatman filter paper (No. 42) was used for
filtration, and the volume was made up to 50 mL using double-distilled water (Kelly et al.,
2008).
Fig. 3.2.1. Kashmir Smast (cave), Nanser, Buner, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
SCREENING AND ISOLATION OF LDPE-DEGRADING BACTERIA
Previously identified strains of Serratia sp. KC1-MRL, Bacillus licheniformis KC2-
MRL, Bacillus sp. KC3-MRL, and Stenotrophomonas sp. KCMRL isolated from the
cave were used in consortium to carry out biodegradation of polyethylene. Nutrient agar
medium was used for isolation of bacterial strains from cave soil. The strains were
isolated using standard serial dilution methods and subsequent growth on Nutrient agar
plates for 48h at 37 °C. All the isolated strains were screened for polyethylene
degradation. For this purpose the strains were incubated for two weeks in 120 mL of
mineral salt medium (g L−1): [KH2PO4, 2.0; K2HPO4, 7.0; MgSO4⋅7H2O, 0.1;
ZnSO4⋅7H2O, 0.001; FeSO4⋅7H2O, 0.01; MnSO4⋅6H2O, 0.002; NH4NO3, 1.0;
CuSO4⋅7H2O, 0.0001; pH 7.2] at 37 °C with pieces of polyethylene (1 by 1 cm) (Anwar
et al., 2009). Polyethylene used was pretreated by exposing it to UV light for three
minutes. At the end of two weeks of incubation, viable cells were counted as CFU mL−1
by serial dilution. Four bacterial strains were found active in terms of growth in the
medium. Bacterial colonies were further purified and enriched on nutrient agar plates.
PREPARATION OF INOCULUM
About 10 mL−1 of nutrient broth was inoculated with two or three loops of the pure
culture of isolated strains. Bacterial growth was evaluated at 25 °C, 37 °C and 40 °C.
Maximum growth was observed at 37 °C (O.D. at 600 nm). Consortia were developed
by taking inocula from each test tube into a separate flask with 100ml of nutrient broth.
Five percent of this prepared consortia was used as inoculum for further biodegradation
experiments.
MEDIUM PREPARATION AND INCUBATION
Different metabolites were used in combinations to study their effects on
biodegradation of polyethylene by the cave-bacteria consortia. Glucose, yeast extract,
and calcium were used as co- metabolites. About 1% w/v of glucose and yeast extract
were used, whereas the concentration of calcium in the medium was maintained at
0.03% to match the natural concentration of calcium of the environment where the soil
was taken.
In total six combinations of these metabolites in mineral salt medium with polyethylene
pieces and bacterial consortia were incubated at 150 rpm at pH 7.2 and temperature 37
°C for four weeks. A negative control was set by incubating polyethylene pieces in
mineral salt medium with no bacterial inoculum.
BIODEGRADATION ANALYSIS
Biodegradation of polyethylene was analyzed by determining CFU mL−1, fourier-
transform infrared spectra, and scanning electron microscope images. CFU mL−1 was
determined after every week, whereas FTIR and SEM analysis were performed after
one month of incubation. The viable cell count was done for bacterial growth
determination through serial dilution and calculating CFU mL−1. Test LDPE samples
were compared with the untreated control samples. FTIR (Jasco FT/ IR – 620) analysis
was performed to check the degradation of LDPE pieces after being mixed with the
growing bacterial consortia in liquid medium. This analysis detects any change in the
functional groups. Spectrum was recorded at 500-4000 wave-numbers cm–1 for all the
LDPE samples. Surface morphology of LDPE pieces was observed by SEM (JSM 5910
Joel, Japan) to look for any change in structure or surface of LDPE piece after treating
with microbial consortia. After rinsing of the LDPE pieces with autoclaved distilled
water, LDPE pieces were mounted on the copper stubs with gold paint. Gold coating
was carried out under vacuum by evaporation to make the samples conducting.
RESULTS
SOIL ANALYSIS
Atomic absorption spectroscopy was performed to determine the concentration of
elements in the cave soil sample (Zada et al., 2016). Ca was 332.938 mg kg–1 as
compared to 121.65 mg kg–1 in control soil, Mg was 1.2576 mg kg–1 in cave soil and
1.023 mg kg–1 in control soil. Ni 0.965 mg kg–1 in cave soil and 10.4 mg kg–1 in control
soil, Cr 0.571 mg kg–1 in cave soil and 8.74 mg kg–1 in control soil, Co 0.266 mg kg–1
in cave soil and 0.810 mg kg–1 in control soil, Cu 1.824 mg kg–1 in cave soil and 4.7 mg
kg–1 in control soil, Zn 12.7311 mg kg–1 in cave soil and 36.41 mg kg–1 in control soil,
and Pb 1.31 mg kg–1 in cave soil and 8.14 mg kg–1 in control soil were much lower than
those found in the control soil (Zada et al., 2016).
VIABLE CELL COUNT
The concentration of viable cells in CFU/ml was determined at time zero, before initial
incubation, and then after every week for a period of one month (Table 1). Since
polyethylene in the medium was the sole carbon source, CFU mL–1 is directly
proportional to the ability of organisms to degrade polyethylene and use it as a carbon
source. There was a consistent decrease in CFU mL–1 after three and four weeks of
incubation. The soil from where the bacteria were isolated contained exceptionally high
concentration of calcium. Considering this high amount of calcium in the native habitat
of the organism, extra calcium salt was added in the medium so that the organisms
experience minimum deviation from their natural environment. Medium augmented
with extra calcium showed increasing values of viable cell count in the first two weeks
of incubation. Increase in the values of viable cell count was also observed in the first
two weeks of incubation when the medium is augmented with glucose; these higher
values of CFU mL–1 in first two weeks were because the bacteria were provided with
glucose that acted as growth activator. Additional amounts of calcium proved to be
helpful for better growth of bacterial colonies.
Table 3.2.1. Viable Cell Count of bacterial consortium in different media compositions incubated at 37 °C.
Time (days)
MSM + PE + bacterial consortium
MSM + PE + calcium carbonate + bacterial consortium
MSM + Glucose + PE + bacterial consortium
MSM + glucose + calcium carbonate + PE + bacterial consortium
MSM + glucose + calcium carbonate + yeast extract + PE + bacterial consortium
MSM + calcium carbonate + yeast extract+ PE + bacterial consortium
CFU/ml (x105) CFU/ml (x105) CFU/ml (x105) CFU/ml (x105) CFU/ml (x105) CFU/ml (x105)
0 280 246 241 220 256 255
7 256 296 292 265 284 295
14 192 221 210 225 237 236
21 110 125 110 164 126 119
28 23 103 68 107 95 92
FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRA-RED SPECTROSCOPY
FTIR was carried out on LDPE films after incubation with bacterial consortia for four weeks. The
peaks formed were compared with the control (Fig. 3.2.2).
LDPE in mineral salt medium containing bacterial consortia: Absorbance peaks formed at 2915
cm–1 and 2848 cm –1 suggest presence of C–H bonds. A peak of variable strength at 1472 cm–1 and
1462 cm–1 shows formation of C=C bonds. A strong peak at 1035 cm–1 shows formation of stretch
of C–O bonds. Absorbance peaks formed at 615 cm–1, 718 cm–1 and 730 cm–1 show presence of
=C–H bending bonds.
LDPE in MSM containing calcium carbonate and bacterial consortia: New peaks were formed at
1645 cm–1 that represent formation of C=C, and a peak formed at 3442 cm–1 shows stretching of
O-H bonds.
LDPE in MSM containing glucose and bacterial consortia: Formation of new peak at 2978 cm–1
shows stretching of C–H bonds and peak at 3638 cm–1 represents of stretching of O–H bonds.
LDPE in MSM containing calcium carbonate, glucose, and bacterial consortia: Maximum variety
of peaks was observed in this film. Formation of peaks at 3251 cm–1 and 3032 cm–1 shows
formation of O–H bonds. A peak at 2915 cm–1 and 2848 cm–1 represents formation of stretch of C–
H bonds in the polyethylene. Peak formation at 2233 cm–1, 2178 cm–1, 2167 cm–1, 2103 cm–1, and
2013 cm–1 shows that new Nitrile bonds of –C ≡ N are formed. Absorbance peaks at 1462 cm–1
and 1472 cm–1 show bending of –C-H- bonds. Peak at 1084 cm–1 shows formation of stretch of C–
O functional group. Absorbance peaks formed at 615 cm–1, 718 cm–1, and 730 cm–1 shows presence
of =C-H bending bonds.
A: Control
(untreate
d) sample
B: No
additives
C: Added
Calcium
Carbonat
e
D: Added
Glucose
E: Added
Calcium
Carbonat
e and
Glucose
F: Added
Calcium
Carbonat
e,
Glucose
and
Yeast
extract
G: Added
Calcium
Carbonat
e and
Yeast
extract
Figure 3.2.2. Fourier-transform infrared spectra from control and different media after
incubation at 37 °C for one month
LDPE in MSM containing calcium carbonate, glucose, yeast extract, and bacterial consortia: In
comparison with control, new peak was formed in this medium combination at 1033 cm–1
represents formation of C–O bond.
LDPE in MSM containing calcium carbonate, yeast extract and bacterial consortia: In comparison
with control, anew peak was formed in this medium combination at 1033 cm–1 that represents
formation of C-O bond.
SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
SEM showed adherence of bacteria that caused mechanical damage and erosion on the surface of
plastic films incubated with bacterial consortia as compared to the untreated control (Fig. 3.2.3). More
changes in surface topology and attachment of cells, despite the washing, were observed on the LDPE
piece incubated in the presence of glucose and calcium.
A: Control (untreated) sample
.
B: No additives
C: Added Calcium Carbonate
D: Added Glucose
E: Added Calcium Carbonate and Glucose
F: Added Calcium Carbonate, Glucose and Yeast extract
G: Added Calcium Carbonate and Yeast extract
Figure. 3.2.3. A-G. Scanning electron microscopy of low-density polyethylene samples under
specified treatment after incubation with bacterial consortia at 37 °C for one month.
DISCUSSION
There is an increasing interest in investigating biodegradation of non-degradable plastics using
efficient microorganisms (Bonhomme et al., 2003; Boonchan et al., 2000; Lee et al., 1991). In our
present study, bacterial isolates were obtained from the soil of Kashmir Smast, which is a limestone
cave in Khyber Pakhtoonkhuwa province, Pakistan. The four isolates were identified as Serratia
sp. KC1-MRL, Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL, Bacillus sp. KC3-MRL, and Stenotrophomonas
sp. KC4-MRL. These strains were used in consortia to check for the ability of these microbes to
degrade polyethylene. Since both antibiotic production and polyethylene degradation occur under
stressed environmental conditions, the hypothesis of the current study was that bacteria having the
first property are more likely to give positive result for the other. Studies on Brevibacillus
borstelensis 707 showed an increase in potential of polyethylene biodegradation when grown on
nitrogen-limit stressed cultures (Hadad et al., 2005). It was also observed that not only nitrogen
deprivation, based on the amount of KNO3 in medium, but also carbon limitation in a mannitol-
free medium alone enhanced degradation which was also enhanced when used in combination. It
was observed that mannitol-free medium supplemented with nitrogen source showed maximum
biodegradation in 30 days of incubation. In the present study, it was found that bacterial consortia
showed higher viable cells measured as CFU mL–1 when the medium was supplemented with the
nitrogen source.
Loss of tensile strength of plastic after incubation with Pseudomonas stutzeri suggests that the
bacterium is capable of degrading the polymer (Sharma and Sharma, 2004). When bacteria are
grown in different media compositions along with a polymer, maximum turbidity is observed on
forty-fifth day (Ciferri, 1999). The increase in growth rate in glucose as well as in minimal medium
suggests that the bacteria were completely depending upon polyethylene film for its source of
carbon in the absence of glucose. CFU mL–1 increased from 101 to 103 from day 15 to day 30
(Table 1). These results suggest that the bacteria growing in Lascaux Cave, France are capable of
using plastics and other resins such as glue as their sole source of carbon. Higher values of CFU/ml
in the first two weeks were observed in all those media combinations in which 1% glucose w/v
was added at the beginning. When the nutrients depleted, bacteria had polyethylene as the only
carbon source. Addition of easily available substrate like glucose in MSM medium increases
bacterial growth in initial stages of pesticide degradation (Cycoń et al., 2011). A similar effect on
growth was observed when MSM media is augmented with yeast extract. The increased CFU mL–
1 was observed in first two weeks of the experiment and then the growth decreased, which indicates
depletion of glucose in the medium.
In our study, fourier-transform infrared spectral analysis was carried out to check chemical
degradation of polyethylene. Low- and high-density polyethylene are made of the elements carbon
and hydrogen forming chains of repeating – CH2 – units (Rajandas et al., 2012). In the process of
biodegradation of LDPE, enzymes catalyze a specific series of biochemical reactions that lead to
various kinds of chemical conversions, such as oxidation, reduction, hydrolysis, esterification, and
molecular inner conversion (Harshvardhan and Jha, 2013). Keto and ester carbonyls have been
reported as major products in the presence of oxidoreductase (Karlsson and Albertsson, 1998).
Analysis of FTIR showed new peaks when LDPE is treated with bacterial consortia, indicating
polymer breakdown and formation of new functional groups. The results of scanning electron
microscopy have shown that all those media to which calcium was added showed strong biofilm
development and hence increased biodegradation. It is also evident in several studies that bacteria
release various surface-active substances extracellularly, which increase the bioavailability to the
polymer. Studies on Pseudomonas sp. AKS2 showed that the strain was capable of degradation 5
± 1 % of initial LDPE in 45 days (Tribedi and Sil, 2013). The degradation by Pseudomonas
depends on its capability to colonize the surface of the polymer and degrade it. Addition of calcium
increases biofilm development of Xylella fastidiosa under in vitro conditions (Cruz et al., 2012).
The efficient increase in formation of biofilm was observed when at least 1.0 mM CaCl2 was added
in the medium. There was no effect of Ca on attachment when bacteria were treated with
tetracycline, indicating that Ca has a regulatory role in colonization or attachment of the cells. In
another study, Ehret and Böl (2013) showed that Ca ions crosslink alginates, which is the key
constituent of the extracellular polymeric material produced by the mucoid P. aeruginosa strain to
produce biofilms. Ciferri reported a list of bacteria responsible for degradation of paints (Ciferri,
1999).
In the present study, SEM showed discoloration, spots, erosion, and cracking on the surface of
polyethylene film. Modification on the surface of polyethylene after bacterial treatment was also
reported by (Matsunaga and Whitney, 2000). Formation of pits and erosion on the surface of LDPE
when observed through electron microscopy when incubated with Fusarium sp. indicating
adherence and degradation of LDPE (Hasan et al., 2007).
Bacteria capable of adhering to plastic surfaces, growing, and possibly degrading it by oxidation
are commonly present in soil. Microorganisms that can adhere to the surface of pre-oxidized PE
are also commonly present in soil. If the pre-oxidant technology is commonly employed in the PE
manufacturing process, one can expect that these plastics will be able to degrade in waste-disposal
sites. In the current study, structural and surface changes in PE in the form of depression, pits, and
erosions were visible in SEM. Physical erosion of the surface of polyethylene observed through
SEM by fungi has been reported by Bonhomme et al. (2003). Polymer treated with microorganism
loses its physical strength and disintegrates on applying mild pressure. Wide-spread pits and holes
in polycaprolactone surface are reported by Shaw et al. (2015) after ten days of incubation with
thermophilic bacterium Ralstonia sp. strain MRL-TL. SEM has shown that biofilms develop on
the surface of polyethylene with time by PE-degrading bacteria. It is known that formation of
biofilm on the surface of plastics favors adhesion of bacteria on the surface and helps them survive
under low-nutrient conditions and to use polyethylene as their source of carbon (Linos et al., 2000).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study indicates that antibiotic-producing bacteria in consortia isolated from a limestone cave
could degrade the synthetic polymer polyethylene. Maximum biodegradation was observed when
the medium was augmented with calcium salt, indicating higher degradation potential of bacterial
consortia when in a medium close to the natural chemical composition of their native environment.
Spectroscopy and microscopy results showed certain changes in low-density polyethylene test
samples as compared to a control, indicating microbial breakdown of LDPE. Further research is
needed to understand the mechanism of degradation of LDPE at a molecular level. All the bacterial
strains were found to viable at the end of the experiment.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are thankful to Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, for providing funds to accomplish this
research.
Lysinibacillus sphaericus AB-8 isolated from a limestone cave (Kashmir Smast) Pirsai
Mardan, Pakistan, and its ability to produce industrially important enzymes
Abstract
In the present study, a bacterial isolate, KC5- MRL isolated from Kashmir Smast (cave), a
limestone cave in Pirsai Mardan, KPK, Pakistan, was found to produce three industrially important
enzymes; lipase, protease and amylase. The bacterial isolate was identified as Lysinibacillus
sphaericus KC5-MRL (Accession No. KF010827). Optimum pH for the growth of Lysinibacillus
sphaericus KC5- MRL, was around 7 and grew best at 35ºC. The optimum activity of lipase was
observed at 30°C after 24 hr of incubation and pH 5 (42.23 U/ml). Maximum lypolytic activity
(181.93 U/ml) was observed when 8% inoculum was used. Amylolytic activity of Lysinibacillus
sphaericus KC5-MRL was optimum (15 U/ml) after 24 hr of incubation at 30°C. Proteolytic
activity of L. sphaericus KC5-MRL was found to be 59 U/ml, after 48 hr at 30°C. Highest stability
(42%) of lipase was observed at pH 10. pH stability of amylase showed highest activity at pH 7
i.e. 99.4%, whereas, protease stability was highest at pH 8. L. sphaericus KC5-MRL lipase,
protease and amylase were stable at 35ºC and with residual activity as 118%, 104% and 107%,
respectively. Triton X-100 and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) stimulated the lipase and protease
activities, whereas, Triton X-100 and T-80 stimulated amylolytic activity. Mg++, NH4+ and Ca++
stimulated the lipase activity and Zn++ showed highest inhibitory effect on lipase activity. Hg+,
Mg++, Zn++ and NH4+ reduced amylase activity, whereas, Na+ and Ca++ showed stimulatory effect.
Hg+, Zn++, Ca++ and NH4+
reduced protease activity but Na+ and Mg+ stimulated protease activity.
Chloroform, formaldehyde, methanol and benzene stimulated amylase activity. Nitobenzene,
methanol, benzene and acetone stimulated protease activity. Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid
(EDTA) showed stimulatory effect on lipase. EDTA, Trisodium citrate TSC, mercaptoethanol,
Phenyl acetaldehyde (PAA) and PMSF reduced amylase activity. All the modulators reduced
protease activity except TSC and PMSF which stimulated its activity. The study concludes that
these enzymes can be used for different purposes in various industries such as food and detergent.
Keywords: Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5- MRL, Kashmir Smast, lipase, limestone, Pakistan
INTRODUCTION
Caves are known to have very poor nutrient ecology and have constant low temperature and
high humidity. Because of this environment, the cave organisms have some extraordinary
properties to survive and live in such hard and crucial condition (Northup et al., 2009; Engel
et al., 2004; Simmons et al., 2008). Cave ecology is rich in different types of microorganisms
having outstanding characteristics. The most abundant organisms observed in caves are
filamentous and belong to Actinobacteria group, followed by coccoid and bacilli forms (Cuezva
et al., 2009). A few pathogenic microorganisms have been reported from the Altamira cave (Jurado
et al., 2006). Luong et al. (2010) described for the first time, A. altamirensis recovered from human
medical constituents. E. coli and S. aureus which are disease causing bacteria have also been
isolated from caves (Lavoie et al., 2005), species of Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas and Alcaligenes
sp. (Ikner et al., 2007) and Inquilinu sp. (Laiz et al. 1999). Nutrient recycling in the cave totally
depends upon the bacterial and fungal activities (Prabhavathi et al., 2012).
Caves have fewer amounts of nutrients, less light or no light ecosystem, which have relatively low
temperature and high humidity. From different caves, around the world, different types of
microbial species have been isolated (Tomova et al., 2013).
Most of the caves are valuable, as it contains some historical paintings which are affected by
progressive microbial colonization and biodeterioration and how to handle this worldwide problem
(Allemand and Bahn, 2005; Cañaveras et al., 2001; Fox, 2008). Most of the caves which have been
studied are in Spain, Italy, France, Romania and USA. Altamira Cave in Spain and Lascaux Cave
of France is the most microbiologically studied cave (Bastian et al., 2009; Schabereiter et al.,
2002a).
Significant growth in biospeleological research has been observed in the last two decades (Urzì et
al., 2010). Caves are considered as extreme environments providing niches for highly specialized
microorganisms (Schabereiter et al., 2002b). Enzymes which are isolated from cave microbes are
active at low temperature. Enzymes of psychrotrophs have great biotechnological importance
(Tomova et al., 2013). These microbes survive in such environment because of production of
enzymes which function in such extreme conditions (Burg, 2003). Our knowledge about cave
microbial diversity is limited, so there is great potential to find novel microorganisms in caves
(Engel, 2010).
Caves in Pakistan are less studied area especially with regards to industrially important enzymes
from cave bacteria have not been reported or isolated so for. Therefore, in our study we focused,
on the isolation of bacteria from Kashmir cave, and their potential to produce industrially important
enzymes having some unique properties.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present study was carried out in the Microbiology Research Laboratory (MRL), Department
of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan. Production of lipase, amylase
and protease by Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL, isolated from a limestone cave (Kashmir
Smast Pirsai Mardan, Pakistan) (Fig. 1) was investigated. The cave (GPS co-ordinates 34° 25'
48.24" N 72° 13' 43.18" E) is 188 m long, 30 m high and 25 m wide, is located in Pirsai Mardan,
Pakistan (Fig. 3.3.1). Soil samples were collected in sterile bags under aseptic conditions.
Fig. 3.3.1. Limestone cave (Kashmir Smast Pirsai Mardan, Pakistan)
Qualitative tests for three enzymes
Protease, Lipase and Amylase
Nutrient agar plates containing (1%) casein as substrate were used to check the proteolytic activity
which was observed in the form of clear zones of hydrolysis around the colonies. For the screening
of lipase, Tween 80 (1%) was used as lipid substrate. After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, appearance
of clear zones was observed (Hasan and Hameed, 2001). Starch was used as substrate to detect the
production of amylolytic enzyme. Inoculated plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and clear
zones of hydrolysis were observed.
Molecular characterization
A bacterial isolate having the ability to produce the three enzymes (lipase, protease and amylase)
was identified on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Sequence Analysis
The sequencing of 16S rRNA gene was performed through Macrogen service, Seoul Korea.
Different bioinformatics tools were used to analyze the sequences i.e. BLAST and FASTA used
for sequenced data observation, alignment of the sequences was performed by using MEGA 5.0
and CLUSTAL W.
Quantitative analysis of lipase, protease and amylase
About 150 ml of medium was added in four different Erlenmeyer flasks, autoclaved for 20 minutes
at 121°C and 15 lbs. About 1.5 ml of olive oil was added to the above medium which was already
sterilized in oven at 121°C for half an hour. Then medium was inoculated with two loopful of
Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL (KF010827) culture under sterilized conditions, then flasks
were kept in shaking incubator at 37°C and 150 rpm. Samples were drawn after 0, 24, 48 and 72
h. Enzyme assay for lipase was performed by the method of (Lesuisse et al., 1993). Unit of enzyme
is defined as the amount of enzyme that hydrolyzes 1 μmol substrate in 1 minute. For protease
assay (Kunitz, 1965) method was used and unit of protease enzymes were defined as that amount
of enzyme which releases 1 μmol tyrosine under standard conditions of assay method. For amylase
enzyme assay (Bernfeld, 1951) method was used and unit of amylase were defined as the amount
of enzyme in 10 ml of filtrate, which releases 1 mg of reducing sugar from 1% starch solution in
1 hr at 37ºC and pH 7.
Shake flask fermentation for optimization of different parameters
To determine the optimum pH for lipase production, fermentation was carried out at different pH
(3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9) and optimum temperature was determined by carrying out shake flask
fermentation at various temperatures (15, 25, 30, 35 and 40°C).
Size of inoculum
A 24 h old bacterial culture grown in Nutrient broth, was added at a concentration of 1 to10% to
the production medium. About 150 ml of production medium was poured into four different flasks.
Samples were taken after 0, 24, 48 and 72 hr and assayed for lipase activity, and centrifuged at
10,000 rpm for 30 minutes at 4°C. Precipitates were removed by filtration and supernatant was
used as the crude enzyme for the estimation of enzyme activity.
Effect of temperature on enzyme activity
Activity of crude enzyme was determined after incubating for 1 hr at 30, 35 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80
and 100˚C.
Effect of pH on enzyme activity
Effect of pH on the activity of crude enzyme extract was studied at different pH. The crude enzyme
was incubated for 1 h in buffers having different pH [0.02 M of acetate buffer (pH 4, 5, 6),
phosphate buffer (pH 6, 7), Tris-HCl (pH 8), glycine-NaOH buffer (pH 9) and Na2HPO4/NaOH
(pH 10)], and remaining enzyme activity was determined under standard conditions.
Effect of metal ions on enzyme activity
Effect of different metals [100 mM of HgCl2, NaCl, MgCl2, ZnCl2, (NH4)2SO4 and CaCl2
separately], on activity of enzymes was determined. These metals were pre-incubated with crude
extract (1:1) for 1 hr at room temperature and then remaining activity was determined.
Effect of modulators on enzyme activity
Effect of different modulators on enzyme activity was determined for EDTA, Trisodium citrate,
mercaptoethanol and PMSF. About 1% of these compounds were pre-incubated for 1 h at room
temperature (25°C) with crude enzyme (1:1).
Effect of solvents on enzyme activity
Effect of different solvents on activity of lipase was determined after pre-incubating crude enzyme
in the presence of (1% each, separately) xylene, benzene, chloroform, nitrobenzene, formaldehyde,
methanol and acetone (1:1) for 1 h at room temperature.
Protein estimation
For protein estimation, Lowry’s method (Lowry, 1951) was used.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Enzymes are known as nature’s catalysts (Louwier et al., 1998). So far different enzymes are
isolated from different living organisms like plants, animals, fungi, yeast and bacteria (Wiseman,
1995). Throughout the world only 2% enzymes are isolated from microorganisms (Frost et al.,
1987). These microorganisms are isolated from different ecosystems. The hidden potential of
microorganisms in sense of valuable industrial enzymes exploration is still on wait. These enzymes
have number of applications in different industries like food, medicine, cosmetics, textile, leather,
detergents, oleochemical and for different diagnostic tools (Hasan et al., 2006). Caves are extreme
environment with poor nutrient content. Caves still have to be explored for new horizons in
Microspeleology sectors. In the world different antibiotics are isolated from different caves. From
ice caves different types of industrially important enzymes have also been reported. Our present
study is focused on caves bacteria to find out industrially important enzymes. Lysinibacillus
sphaericus is a gram positive, rod shaped mesophilic bacterium that naturally occur in soil.
Sequence Analysis
The bacterial isolate was identified as Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL (Accession No.
KF010827) (Fig. 3.3.2).
Fig.
3.3.2. Evolutionary relationships of taxa Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL
Qualitative Tests for enzymes (protease, amylase and lipase)
Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL was positive for all the enzymes with largest zone of
hydrolysis of substrates.
Effect of pH, temperature, size of inoculum on growth of Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-
MRL
Growth of L. sphaericus KC5-MRL was optimum at neutral pH 7, with optimum growth at 35°C
and almost no growth at temperature 15 and 40°C (Fig. 3.3.3), and size of inoculum 8% after 72 h
(Fig. 3.3.3).
Lysinibacillus sphaericus(JN377786)
Lysinibacillus sphaericus(JN377784)
Lysinibacillus sphaericus(JN377785)
Lysinibacillus fusiformis(FJ418643)
Lysinibacillus sphaericus(GU204967)
Lysinibacillus sp(HM222673)
Lysinibacillus sp(AM910304)
Lysinibacillus sp(AB689752)
Lysinibacillus sp(JN695724)
Lysinibacillus sp(JX566617)
Lysinibacillus sphaericus-(EU880531)
Lysinibacillus sphaericus(CP000817)
Lysinibacillus sphaericus(FJ544252)
Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL (KF010827)
31
85
43
64
20
12
8
11
14
2
2
Fig. 3.3.3. Effect of size of inoculum on the growth of Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL
and production of lipase
Effect of pH, temperature and size of inoculum for the optimum lipolytic activity
The optimum activity of L. sphaericus KC5-MRL lipase was observed at 30°C after 24 hr of
incubation and pH 5 i.e. 42.23 U/ml (Fig. 3.3.5). Maximum lipolytic activity (181.93 U/ml) was
observed when 8% inoculum was used (Fig. 3.3.3). Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL showed
maximum lipase production 23 U/ml at 30°C and pH 5 after 24 h of incubation. Similar specific
enzyme activity was reported by different investigators for lipase (Hasan and Hameed, 2001; Ankit
et al., 2011; Ozgur and Nilufer, 2012). Lipase from Pseudomonas sp., that produced maximum
lipase after 24 h of incubation at 30-40°C (Kathiravan et al., 2012). Pseudomonas sp., produced
maximum lipase at pH 5.5 (Kavitha and Shanthi, 2013). Variation in pH, incubation time and
incubation temperature may be due to isolate specificity for different conditions. Maximum lipase
activity was observed at a size of 7% inoculum. Balan et al. (2010) reported maximum lipase
production when 7% inoculum of Geobacillus thermodenitrificans was used in flask fermentation.
Fig. 3.3.4. Lipolytic, amylolytic and proteolytic activity of Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-
MRL at 30°C
Enzyme assay for amylase and protease
The amylolytic activity of Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL was optimum, 15 U/ml, after 24
h of incubation at 30°C, whereas it decreased much after 72 h i.e. 4 U/ml (Fig. 3.3.4). Proteolytic
activity of L. sphaericus KC5-MRL was calculated to be 59 U/ml, after 48 h of incubation at 30°C,
and decreased after 24 h i.e. 26 U/ml (Fig. 4). Amylase activity and incubation period were noted
between 9-16 U/ml and 24-72hrs. Demirkan, (2010) isolated amylase from Bacillus subtilis and
its mutant have the some incubation periods but our amylase units is in contradict. Our strains
amylase activity is less from his isolated amylase. The protease activity and incubation period were
noted between 40-75 U/ml and 24-72 hrs. Different investigators (Mayerhofer et al., 1973; Patil
et al., 2011) have been reported that protease is produced during stationary phase. They isolated
these proteases from Pseudomonas fluorescens P26 and Bacillus spp. Amro et al. (2009) isolated
bacterial proteases from different bacteria which have maximum protease activity in the range of
34-44 U/ml. In our research the proteases have high activity from them.
Characterization of crude lipase, amylase and protease produced by L. sphaericus KC5-
MRL
Stability of crude enzymes at different pH
Lipase was not stable at pH 4. Highest stability of lipase was observed at pH 10 i.e. 42%, followed
by pH 6 with lipase stability as 22%. At pH 5, 7, 8 and at pH 9, lipase activity reduced to 11.4%,
24.5%, 4.5% and 9.8% respectively. pH stability results showed that highest amylolytic activity
was observed at pH 7 i.e. 99.4%. Lowest amylase activity was observed at pH 4 and 5, as 9.9 and
31.4%, respectively. Protease produced by L. sphaericus KC5-MRL showed lowest stability at pH
10 i.e. 92%. Highest activity was noted at pH i.e. 115%. L. sphaericus KC5-MRL protease was
found stable at all pH values (Fig. 3.3.5). Mobarak et al. (2011) reported that lipase of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa KM110 showed optimum activity at pH 8 i.e. 27%. Our isolated lipase
also showed 142% activity at alkaline pH 10. This was maximum activity for the pH value tested.
Kojima et al. (1994) isolated bacterial lipase from Pseudomonas fluorescens AK102 which were
stable at pH 4-10 and maximum stability was noted at pH 8-10. All the amylase of the four strains
showed stability from 6-10 pH value. It’s showed that these amylase work best it alkaline pH.
Bacillus subtilis AB-22 amylase was stimulated by pH 10. A sharp decline was noted at a pH 4
and 5.Our results are similar with Krishnan and Chandra (1983) isolated amylase from Bacillus
licheniformis CUMC305 which have maximum activity and stability at pH 9. But the amylase was
active at a wide range of pH from 3-10. Most of the protease in our study was noted to be stable
from 4-10 pH values. Stimulation of activity observed at alkaline pH. Only one protease Bacillus
subtilis AB-3 showed highest activity at pH 7 ie 127%. The remaining 3 proteases were showed
maximum activity at pH 8-10. Our results are similar to that of Adinarayana et al., (2003) who
isolated protease from Bacillus spp. BZI-2 and Femi-Ola and Oladokun, (2012) from Lactobacillus
brevis.
Fig. 3.3.5. Stability of crude extracts of lipase, amylase and protease of Lysinibacillus
sphaericus KC5-MRL at different pH
Stability of crude enzymes at different temperature
L. sphaericus KC5-MRL lipase highest (118%) stability was observed at 35°C, lowest stability
(64%) was observed at 80°C. The highest temperature stability of L. sphaericus KC5-MRL
amylase was observed at 35ºC i.e. 107%. Almost no amylolytic activity was recorded at 100ºC.
The highest temperature stability of L. sphaericus KC5-MRL protease was observed at 35ºC i.e.
104%, whereas, lowest stability was reported at 80ºC and 100ºC i.e. 70% and 31%, respectively
(Fig. 3.3.6). Lipase retained its activity at all temperatures tested. The highest activity was
observed at 35°C. The enzymes were stable at 30-80°C. Wang et al. (1995) characterized a
bacterial lipase of Bacillus strain A30-1 (ATCC 53841) which was stable at 75°C. Rathi et al.
(2000) isolated a lipase from Pseudomonas sp., which was stable at 90°C for 3 h. In our research,
lipase was stable for 1 h at 80°C. Demirkan. (2010) isolated amylase from Bacillus subtilis reported
highest activity from the current study. Different investigators (Mayerhofer et al., 1973; Patil et
al., 2011) have reported that protease is produced during stationary phase. They isolated these
proteases from Pseudomonas fluorescens P26 and Bacillus spp. Amro et al. (2009) isolated
bacterial proteases from different bacteria which have maximum protease activity in the range of
34-44 U/ml. In our study we reported 59 U/ml proteases activity. Overall, the isolated amylases in
our study were stable from 30 to 80ºC for 1 h. Malhotra et al. (2000) reported α-amylase of Bacillus
thermooleovorans NP54 which was active at 100ºC for 10 minutes. The enzymes they reported
were stable at 40-100ºC. Our results are similar to that of Adinarayana et al. (2003). They isolated
protease from Bacillus sp. BZI-2 and Femi-Ola and Oladokun (2012) isolated protease from
Lactobacillus brevis. Pathak and Deshmukh. (2012) reported a protease from Bacillus
licheniformis which was active in the range of 20-90ºC. Lee et al. (2000) isolated a protease from
Pseudoalteromonas sp. A28, which is in accordance with our study.
Effect of detergents on lipolytic, amylolytic and proteolytic activity of Lysinibacillus
sphaericus KC5-MRL
Addition of Tween-80 reduced liypolytic activity up to 4%. Triton X-100 and sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS) stimulated the lipase activity up to 4% and 3%, respectively. SDS reduced amylase
activity of L. sphaericus KC5-MRL activity up to 70%. Trition X-100 and T-80 stimulated
amylolytic activity as 19% and 23%, respectively. Protease activity was reduced (62.3%) by
addition of T-80. Triton X-100 and T-80 stimulated protease activity up to 9% and 23%,
respectively (Fig. 3.3.7). Lee et al. (1999) reported that different detergents change the activity of
Bacillus thermoleovorans ID-1 thermophilic lipase. They reported no activity of Triton X-100 but
in contrast to our study, it stimulated the lipase activity and SDS also stimulated enzyme activity.
Bacillus thermoleovorans ID-1 lipase activity were reduced by Tween 80. None of the surfactants
tested had a pronounced inhibitory effect on amylase activities. Oliveira et al. (2010) reported
amylase from Rhizobia strains. Amylase activity was not inhibited by detergents/surfactants which
they used in their experiments. They reported that Triton X-100 moderately inhibited enzyme
activity and SDS and Tween-80 showed stimulatory effect on the enzyme activity. Similar results
were noted in the present study. Addition of surfactants in case of proteases showed some
stimulatory and as well as inhibitory effect. Nascimento and Martins (2006) isolated protease from
Bacillus sp., which was inhibited by the addition of surfactants like SDS and Triton X-100. This
result is similar to the present study.
Fig. 3.3.6. Stability of crude extracts of lipase, amylase and protease of Lysinibacillus
sphaericus KC5-MRL at different temperature
Effect of metal ions on lipase, amylase and protease activity
The metal ions e.g. Mg++, NH4+ and Ca++ stimulated lipase activity as; 25.8%, 31.1% and 27.54%,
respectively. Ammonium ion stimulated the lipase activity up to 31.7%. Hg+, Na+ and Zn++
inhibited lipase activity as 2%, 7% and 11.31%, respectively. Zn++ showed highest inhibitory effect
on lipase activity. Some metals were inhibitory while others stimulated amylase of L. sphaericus
KC5-MRL. Hg+, Mg++, Zn++ and NH4+ reduced amylase activity as 69, 11, 26 and 55%
respectively. Presence of Na+ and Ca++ showed stimulatory effect up to 11 and 6%, respectively.
Some metals were inhibitory for protease of L. sphaericus KC5-MRL (KF010827). Hg+, Zn++,
Ca++ and NH4+
reduced protease activity 57, 46, 47 and 15% respectively. Na+ and Mg+ stimulated
protease activity up to 8 and 16%, respectively (Fig. 3.3.8). Effect of different metal ions was
checked on the basis of residual activity of crude extract. Mg++, NH4+ and Ca++ stimulated lipase
activity. Stimulation of crude extract activity have been reported by different investigators Li and
Ziaobo. (2005) reported that Ca++ and Mg++ stimulate the activity of Geobacillus sp. TW1 lipase.
Our results are similar to that of Mobarak et al. (2011), where Pseudomonas
aeruginosa KM110 lipase was inhibited by Zn++ and Cu++ (Mobarak et al., 2011). Some
metals were found inhibitory and some stimulatory for the Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL
amylase. Hailemariam et al. (2013) also reported amylase from a Bacillus sp. which was inhibited
by different metals ions. Activity of amylase from different bacterial isolates was reduced by
different divalent cations (Najaf 2005; Goyal et al., 2005; Ramesh et al., 1990; Koch et al., 1991;
Božić et al., 2011; Mamo et al., 1999). All metals were inhibitory for the protease. Banerjee et al.
(1999) reported Brevibacillus (Bacillus) brevis to be inhibited by CuSO4, ZnCl2 and HgCl2.
Usharani and Muthuraj. (2010) reported Bacillus laterosporus protease whose activity was
inhibited by the presence of different metals ions. The inhibitory effect of heavy metal ions is well
documented in the literature. In the present study most of the metal ions inhibited the enzyme
activity.
Fig. 3.3.7. Effects of detergents on the lipolytic, amylolytic and proteolytic activity of isolate
Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL
Effect of organic solvents on lipase, amylase and protease activity
Presence of nitro-benzene (N.B) reduced lipase activity up to 3.3%. Other organic solvents
stimulated lipase activity. Highest stimulation was observed in case of benzene (B) 14.32%.
Addition of xylene (X) showed no effect on the activity of lipase while chloroform (Ch),
formaldehyde (Frm), methanol (Met) and acetone (Ace), stimulated lipase activity as 2.5%, 10.5%,
4.2% and 3%, respectively. Chloroform, formaldehyde, methanol and benzene stimulated amylase
activity up to 9, 4, 3.5, 2 and 7%, respectively. Nitro- benzene, xylene and acetone reduced amylase
activity up to 33, 5 and 50%, respectively. N.B, methanol, benzene and acetone stimulated L.
sphaericus KC5-MRL protease activity up to 17, 17, 4 and 27%, respectively. Formaldehyde,
chloroform and xylene reduced protease activity up to 10, 66 and 30%, respectively (Fig. 3.3.9).
Organic solvents mostly showed some kind of stimulatory effects. Highest
stimulation noted in case of benzene while nitrobenzene was inhibitory for
enzyme. Our results are similar with that of Nawani et al. (2006). They reported
benzene as stimulator for the lipase of thermophilic Bacillus sp. Schmidt et al. (1994) reported that
different organic solvents like methanol, acetone and ethanol enhanced lipase activity isolated
from B. thermocatenulatus. Prakash et al. (2009) reported two different types of bacterial amylases
whose activities were inhibited by chloroform and other organic solvents while alcohol and
acetone stimulated enzyme activity. Similar observation was reported in our study. Organic
solvents showed stimulatory and as well as inhibitory effects in case of proteases. Rahman et al.
(2006) isolated protease from Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain K whose activity was inhibited by
1-pentanol, benzene, toluene, p-xylene and n-hexane up to 33%, 35%, 30%, 48% and 36%
respectively.
Fig. 3.3.8. Effect of metal ions on lipase, amylase and protease activity of isolate Lysinibacillus
sphaericus KC5-MRL
Effect of modulators on lipase, amylase and protease activity
Phenyl acetaldehyde (PAA) inhibited the activity of crude extract of lipase up to 17.3%.
Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic acid (EDTA) stimulated lipolytic activity up to 24.4%.
Mercaptoethanol (Mre) showed no effect on lipolytic activity, whereas, Tri-sodium citrate (TSC)
and phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF) both inhibited lipase activity up to 14%. All the
modulators reduced amylase activity. EDTA, TSC, mercaptoethanol, PAA and PMSF reduced L.
sphaericus KC5-MRL amylase activity up to 18, 84, 1, and 16%, respectively. All the modulators
reduced protease activity except TSC and PMSF which stimulated protease activity up to 24 and
5%, respectively. EDTA, mercaptoethanol and PAA reduced protease activity up to 34, 37 and
26%, respectively (Fig.3.3.10). Ballschmiter et al. (2006) reported an amylase from
hyperthermophilic bacteria with reduced activity in the presence of EDTA. They reported that
amylase activity was slightly stimulated by the presence of mercaptoethanol which contradicts
with our results. Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MR showed that this protease belong to metalo
proteases. Similar results also reported by Mabrouk et al. (1999). They isolated protease from
Bacillus licheniformis ATCC 21415, which was inhibited by EDTA.
Fig. 3.3.9. Effects of organic solvents on lipase, amylase and protease activity of Lysinibacillus
sphaericus KC5-MRL
Fig. 3.3.10. Effect of inhibitors on lipase, amylase and protease activity of Lysinibacillus
sphaericus KC5-MRL
Conclusions
Bacteria isolated from cave environment were able to produced enzymes (Lipase, protease,
amylase). Lysinibacillus sphaericus KC5-MRL has shown varying activities of the three enzymes.
Different characteristics of enzymes indicated their possible use in biotechnology and industry.
Bio-mineralization of CaCO3 by bacterial strains isolated from Kashmir
Cave. Buner
Abstract
Caves are underground natural compartments and hosts diverse microbial communities. Cave
bacterial strains make significant contribution in the precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO3).
In the present study, it is shown that the CaCO3 precipitation is due to result of microbial metabolic
activities. The bacterial strains were isolated and purified from Kashmir Cave Mardan Khyber
Pukhtunkhwa (K.P.K) soil. B4 medium was used in the whole research for the CaCO3
precipitation. A total of three bacterial strains showed the capability of CaCO3 precipitation on the
selected medium. Viable bacterial count was done by determining colony forming unit (CFU) of
samples observed bacterial load of 4.6×104 per gram of cave soil. Bacterial cells with
mineralization potential were molecularly identified through 16S rRNA gene sequencing as
Bacillus toyonensis, Paracoccus Limosus and Brevundimonas diminuta The most precipitates
were observed at temperature and pH of 25oC and 5. The precipitated CaCO3 was further
confirmed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray powder diffraction (X-RD), and
Fourier Transform Infra Red spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis.
Introduction
Microbial carbonate precipitation has emerged as a promising technology for remediation and
restoration of concrete structures. A number of diverse microbial species participate in the
carbonate precipitation in different natural environment as in soils, in geological formation (caves),
saline CaCO3 and ocean (Bharathi, 2014). Bacteria are capable of performing metabolic activities
which thereby promote precipitation of calcium carbonate in the form of calcite (Bansal et al.,
2016). Over recent years, the implementation of microbially produced calcium carbonate (CaCO3)
in different industrial and environmental applications has become an alternative for conventional
approaches to induce CaCO3 precipitation. However, there are many factors affecting the bio-
mineralization of CaCO3, which may restrict its application (Seifan, 2017). It is widely known that
microorganisms contribute to the generation of a wide diversity of minerals such as carbonates,
phosphates, sulfides, and silicates. Among all bio- precipitated minerals, the production of CaCO3
has drawn much attention due to its role in environmental and industrial applications. The bio-
precipitation of CaCO3 can be achieved through biologically controlled mineralization (BCM) and
biologically induced mineralization (BIM) (Wei et al., 2015).
There are different hypotheses for bacterial production of carbonate. The first hypothesis is ionic
exchange through the bacterial cell membrane (Castainer et al., 2000). In this approach, which is
considered as an active precipitation, microbial CaCO3 precipitation is induced by successful
attachment of bacterial cell walls and positively charged Ca2+ ions. The production of extracellular
polymeric substances (EPS) is assumed as another hypothesis in regard to CaCO3 precipitation
through the trapping of Ca2+ (Kremer et al., 2008). The precipitation of carbonates is governed
mainly by four factors: (1) calcium concentration, (2) carbonate concentration, (3) pH of the
environment and (4) presence of nucleation sites (Hammes and Verstraete, 2002). Calcium
carbonate precipitation is a biological as well as a geochemical method of producing carbonates
of calcium with help of microorganisms specially those residing inside cave soil (Mortensen et al.,
2011). This biological process carry out mineral precipitation, which holds the different soil
particles packed in one structure and may also enhance the stiffness ability of the soil. Cave
microbes can enzymatically carry out the biological reactions to crystalize calcium carbonate in
soil (Fujita et al., 2000). Precipitation of calcium carbonate by ureolytic bacteria is one such
mechanism where urea is hydrolysed into ammonium and bicarbonate. The Ca2+ ions subsequently
react with the CO32− ions, leading to the precipitation of CaCO3 at the cell surface that serves as a
nucleation site. Precipitation of carbonates by carbonic anhydrase (CA) is another mechanism
(Dhami et al., 2014). This enzyme has been found to have the most potential biological catalyst
for hydration of CO2 leading to formation of CaCO3 in presence of calcium source (Li et al., 2010).
Several genera of halophilic bacteria have been reported to precipitate carbonates in natural marine
habitats, which include Halomonas, Deleya, Flavobacterium, Acinetobacterand Salinivibrio
(Ferrer et al., 1988; Rivadeneyra, 1993; Rivadeneyra et al., 2006). These bacteria have the
potential to grow in wide range of osmotic concentrations, which makes them very useful for
studying the effect of different salt concentrations on carbonate precipitation efficacy. Soil residing
bacteria can boost up calcium carbonate precipitation by promoting the alkaline conditions in cave
soil (Kohnhauser et al., 2007), this is achieved by many biogeochemical processes like nitrate,
sulfate, iron reduction, and break down of urea (DeJong et al., 2010). Cave bacteria ensure
dissolution and precipitation reactions that comprise carbonates, clays, silicates, manganese, iron,
sulfur, and formation of speleothems (Northup and Lavoie et al., 2001).
Bio-mineralization of calcium carbonate by cave microbes is a complex dynamic process that may
be affected by many factors including pH, temperature and incubation time. Therefore, the main
aims of the present study were to investigate (i) the effect of temperature on bacterial growth and
CaCO3 precipitation, (ii) time of incubation in correlation to bio-mineralization of calcium
carbonate and (iii) the performance of bacteria to induce CaCO3 precipitation at different ranges
of pH by bacterial strains isolated from Kashmir Cave, Buner, KPK, Pakistan.
Materials and Methods
All the chemicals and reagents utilized in this study were of analytical grade and obtained from
Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co.
Sampling
Soil samples were collected from the dark zone aseptically in sterile polythene zipper bags from
Kashmir Smast (cave) situated at District Buner, Nanseer Buner, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. (GPS
coordinates 34o25’42.12”N 72o13’10.82”E), Pakistan. Temperature and pH of the sampling site
was recorded. Samples were carefully transported on ice to Microbiology Research Laboratory
(MRL), Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad and stored at 4±0.5°C for further study.
The Kashmir caves are a series of natural limestone caves, located in the Babozai Mountains
between Mardan and Buner districts in Northern Pakistan. Details given in reports by Ziad (2006)
and Zada et al., (2016).
Atomic absorption analysis of sample
Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AA240FS Fast Sequential Atomic Absorption
Spectrophotometer) was carried out for quantitative analysis of elements in the soil sample.
Sample was analysed in triplicate and mean value of absorbance was used to determine metal
concentration. Soil digestion procedure was performed by grinding 1 g of soil sample and then it
was mixed with 15 mL aqua regia and heated at 150°C and left overnight, and added
A B
C D
HClO4 and again heated at 150°C. The solution became almost dry until brown fumes came out.
Whatman filter paper (No. 42) was used for filtration and the volume was raised up to 50 ml along
with double distilled water (FAO/SIDA, 1983). Ordinary garden soil was run in parallel as a
control.
Isolation and enumeration of bacteria
Standard protocol of serial dilution was carried out for isolation and enumeration of bacteria from
soil sample. About 100 μL of each dilution was transferred and spread on nutrient agar plates and
incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. The plates were checked for bacterial growth and viable cell count
(CFU/g) was calculated. Different colonies were marked and sub-cultured separately to obtain
pure colonies and later preserved in 30% glycerol at -20°C.
Identification of bacterial isolates
Isolates were presumptively characterized by morphological and microscopic analysis. All the
isolates were also subjected to biochemical characterization (Oxidase, Catalase, Citrate, Urease,
TSI, Casein, Amylase and Gelatinase tests) according to Bergey’s Manual of Determinative
Bacteriology (Holt et al., 2012). Molecular identification of all the isolates was carried out by
sequencing the 16S rRNA genes.
DNA Isolation
DNA extraction of bacterial cell was carried out by centrifugation of 1 mL broth culture at 10,000
x g for 5 minutes and the cells were pelleted out and rinsed twice in 400 µL TE buffer after removal
of supernatant. Cells were suspended in 560 µL of TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA; pH 8.0)
followed by 30 μL of sodium dodecyl sulfate (10% wt/vol) and 3 µL of proteinase K (2% w/v)
and incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes. About 100 μL of NaCl (5 M) and 80 μL CTAB/ NaCl (10%
w/v CTAB, 0.7 M NaCl) was added to cell suspension and incubated at 65°C for 10 minutes in
water bath. Chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was added in same volume to the mixture and
centrifuged 12,000 x g for 7 minutes to precipitate polysaccharides. Supernatant was collected and
added same volume of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1), mixed thoroughly and
centrifuged at 12,000 x g, the supernatant was collected. Finally, isopropanol was added to the
supernatant to precipitate the DNA. After centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 7 minutes the supernatant
was removed and the DNA was resuspended in 80 µL TE buffer and RNase, and stored at -4oC for
further study (Ausubel et al., 1995). The purified DNA was analyzed through agarose gel (1.5 g
in TBE), and stained with ethidium bromide.
Sequencing of 16S rRNA was performed for identification of bacterial isolates. Amplification of
full length gene was carried out using 27F’ (5’-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1494R’
(5’-CTACGGCTACCTTGTTACGA-3’) bacterial primers (Zeng et al., 2008). The 20 mL PCR
reaction mixture consisted of 1 mL DNA sample, 2 mL PCR buffer, 2 mL deoxynucleotide
triphosphate (dNTP) mix, both forward and reverse primers 2 mL each, 0.5 mL Ex-Taq DNA
polymerase (Takara Shuzo, Otsu, Japan) and 10.5 mL distilled water. Initially, the reaction mixture
was incubated at 96°C for 4 min. Then 35 amplification cycles were performed at 94°C for 45sec,
55°C for 60sec, and 72°C for 60sec. The reaction was incubated further for 7 min at 72°C. A
positive control of Escherichia coli genomic DNA and a negative control were included in the
PCR. Purification of PCR products were carried out using Montage PCR Clean up kit (Millipore)
in order to get rid of distinct PCR primers and dNTPs from PCR products. Sequencing of the
purified PCR product was performed by using 2 primers, 518F’ (5’-
CCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACG-3’) and 800R’ (5’-TACCAGGGTATCTAATCC-3’).
Sequencing was done through Big Dye terminator cycle sequencing kit v.3.1 (Applied Bio-
Systems, USA) and sequencing products were resolved on an Applied Bio-Systems model 3100
automated DNA sequencing system (Applied Bio-Systems, USA) by Macrogen, Inc., Seoul,
Korea.
Chimeras of the obtained sequences were examined via Check-Chimera program of Ribosomal
Database Project (RDP) (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/seqmatch/seqmatch_intro.jsp) and also
compared with 16S rRNA gene sequences present in public database GenBank (NCBI) by using
BLAST search program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/). The 16S rRNA gene sequences
of various bacteria that are closely related to the studied sequence, as shown by BLAST search,
were obtained from GenBank database and were aligned with the new sequences using BioEdit
6.0. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the Maximum Likelihood method with robustness
of 1000 bootstrap value in MEGA 6.0 (Tamura et al., 2004). All the sequences obtained were
submitted to NCBI GenBank and the accession numbers have been assigned.
CaCO3 bio-mineralization
For bacterial precipitation of CaCO3 crystals B4 medium was used. Composition of B4 medium
used was (g/L); yeast extract, 4; dextrose, 10; calcium acetate, 2.5 and agar 15 g, (pH 7), autoclaved
and poured into plates followed by standard streaking of isolates on the plates in such a way that
one line was drawn in middle of the plate and incubated at 25°C. Results of CaCO3 precipitation
were checked after 4 days of incubation at 25oC.
Effect of temperature and pH on growth of bacteria and CaCO3 precipitation
Effect of temperature (15, 25, 35, 40°C) and pH (5, 7, 8, and 9) on bacterial growth and CaCO3
precipitation was determined in order to optimize the growth and precipitation conditions on B4
medium.
X-ray Diffraction (XRD) of the crystals
X-ray powder Diffraction (XRD) is a rapid analytical technique used for phase identification and
characterization of unknown crystalline materials (e.g. minerals, inorganic compounds) and
identification of fine-grained minerals such as clays and mixed layer clays that are difficult to
determine optically (http://serc.carleton.edu/research_education/ geochemsheets/ techniques/
XRD.html). Calcium carbonate crystals were properly washed with distilled water and dried in
oven. XRD patterns were obtained from the samples using (X’Pert-APD Philips, The Netherlands)
with an X-ray generator (3 kW) and anode (LFF Cu). The Cu Kα radiation was administered at a
wavelength of 1.54 Å. The X-ray generator tension and current were 40 kV and 30 mA,
respectively. The step-scan data were continuously collected over the range of 5 to 80°2θ. The
time constant was set at 2s to check the composition of precipitated calcium carbonates.
Scanning electron microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Philips XL30CP) was performed to observe the
morphology of crystals precipitated by bacterial strains.
Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was performed to study the secondary structure of
CaCO3 crystal. CaCO3 crystals synthesized by bacteria were picked from the plate were placed in
a holder and exposed to infrared beam for analysis through Fourier Transform Infrared
Spectrometer (Jasco FT/ IR– 620). The samples were scanned from 4000-400 cm-1 at resolution
of 6.0 cm-1.
Results
Metals analysis
Mean concentration (mg/Kg) of elements in cave samples were in the following order; calcium
(Ca) > Sodium (Na) > Magnesium (Mg) > Potassium (K) > Iron (Fe) > Manganese (Mn) > Zinc
(Zn) > Chromium (Cr) > Lead (Pb) > Nickel (Ni) > copper (Cu) (Table 1). Mean concentration of
these elements in cave samples were higher as compared to simple garden soil as a reference.
Isolation of Bacteria
Number of viable cell count was calculated as 4.6×104 CFU/g. In this study, total 25 bacterial
strains were isolated. The CaCO3 mineralization potential of all the isolates was investigated and
only 3 isolates named GSN-11, TFSN-14 and, TFSN-15 was able to mineralize CaCO3.
Identification of bacteria
The 16S rRNA gene sequences of CaCO3 precipitating bacteria have been submitted to NCBI
GenBank. The isolates GSN-11, TFSN-14 and TFSN-15 were identified as Bacillus toyonensis
GSN-11, Paracoccus carotinifaciens TFSN-14, and Brevundimonas naejangsanensis TFSN-15
(Fig. 3.4.1).
Figure.3.4.1. Phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood method
The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei
model [1]. The tree with the highest log likelihood (-1525.1520) is shown. The percentage of trees in which the
associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were
obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances
estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with
superior log likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of
substitutions per site. The analysis involved 22 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were
1st+2nd+3rd+Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total
of 751 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6.
Calcium carbonate precipitation
Clear zone around streak was observed after 10 days of incubation (Fig. 3.4.2.A). These plates
were further incubated and after 20 days increased precipitation was observed on streak surface
(Fig.3.4.2. B).
Fig. 3.4.2. Calcium precipitates induced by bacteria in crystals form A) Paracoccus
Limosus, B) Brevundimonas naejangsanensis.
Parameters optimization for Calcium carbonate precipitation
Temperature effect
Temperature was optimized for bacterial precipitation of Calcium carbonate in B4 medium. The
maximum precipitation was observed at 25°C and beyond this, no precipitation was observed (Fig.
3.4.3).
Fig. 3.4.3. Compound microscopy of precipitates produced at 25°C.
pH effect
A B
Different pH values were checked for calcium carbonate precipitation in B4 medium. It was
revealed that maximum crystal formation was observed at pH 5 (Fig. 3.4.4).
Fig. 3.4.4. Compound microscopy of precipitates produced at pH 5.
Incubation time effect
Different incubation time was used for calcium carbonate precipitation. At optimum temperature
and pH in B4 medium, optimum incubation time for maximum precipitation was observed 20 days
(Figure. 3.4.5).
Fig. 3.4.5. Compound microscopy of precipitates produced after 20 days of incubation.
Scanning electron microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy was performed for calcium carbonate crystals precipitated by
bacterial isolates on B4 medium. Clear precipitations of the calcium carbonates were observed in
scanning electron microscopy at different magnification (Fig. 3.4.6). The clear crystals formation
revealed that these cave bacteria are capable to precipitate the calcium carbonates that are present
in abandoned amount in the natural environment of cave.
Fig. 3.4.6. Electron microscopy at different wavelength (A) at 500 µm, (B) at 200 µm, (C) at
100 µm, (D) 50 µm, (E) 1 micro meter.
A B
C D
E
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis
Calcium carbonate purchased from sigma was used as a reference with bacterial precipitated
calcium carbonate sample. The control exhibited characteristic peaks of CaCO3 at 871cm-1, 712cm-
1, 1794cm-1, 1405cm-1, all the samples analyzed, showed peaks in the same regions which indicated
calcium carbonate presence in the samples precipitated by cave bacteria (Figure. 3.4.7).
Fig. 3.4.7. FTIR analysis of CaCO3 with control.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis
XRD was performed for the quantitative determination of calcium carbonate polymorphs. Fig 3.4.8
shows the XRD patterns of three polymorphic calcium carbonate crystals as calcite, aragonite and
vaterite. All synthesized calcium carbonate samples were crushed into fine powder form for
characterization (Fig. 3.4.8).
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
In
ten
sity (
arb
.un
its)
2 (degrees)
key:
C= calcite, A= aragonite and V= vaterite.
Fig. 3.4.8. XRD analysis of the polymorphs of Calcium carbonate.
Characterization of CaCO3 mineralizing bacteria
All the CaCO3 mineralizing bacteria were subjected into cultural and biochemical characterization.
Among four, 2 isolates, GSN-11 and TFSN-14 were gram negative, while TFSN-15 and GSN-22
were gram positive. Conventional biochemical tests were performed for all four isolates and
reported in Table.2. All the isolates were optimally grow at 25°C and fall in mesophilic range,
while at lower temperature the growth was negligible. The pH ranges of all four isolates were fall
in acidic range and showed optimum growth at pH 5-8 11 and 9 while no growth was observed
beyond this pH. Optimum incubation time for calcium carbonate preceptation was 20 days for all
isolates.
A
C
v
The isolates named GSN-11, TFSN-14, TFSN-15 and GSN-22 were studied for phylogenetic
analysis through 16S rRNA sequencing. Sequences obtained from these isolates exhibited variable
similarities with the reference sequences from NCBI GenBank. Isolate TFSN-14, has 99% identity
with Paracoccus Limosus, isolate TFSN-15 has 99% identity with Brevundimonas diminuta and
isolate GSN-11 has 99% identity with Bacillus toyonensis.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
The nucleotide sequence described in this study can be found from NCBI nucleotide sequence
database under accession numbers
Discussion
Low nutrient availability, low temperature pH and high humidity can be consider as paradigm of
extreme environment in caves for all form of life. Microbes inhabiting caves play important role
in cave formation via different process like bio-mineralization, speleogenesis and other
geochemical process. The current investigation was aimed to isolate and characterised the
possible role of cave microbes in bio-mineralization of calcium carbonate from Kashmir cave
Buner Pakistan. A total of 3 strains were isolated in this study and characterized molecularly
(16S rRNA). All the isolates clustered in to alpha Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, further
differentiated in to Bacillus sp. GSN 11, Parcoccus sp. TFSN14 and Brevundimonas sp.
TFSN15. All these isolates were good candidate for calcium carbonate precipitation. Generally,
the precipitation processes are not related to a particular bacterial group, and have been reported
from numerous ecosystem. Previous investigation shows that halophilic bacteria
Exiguobacterium mexicanum was isolated from sea water and tested for biomineralization
potential under different salt stress conditions (Bansal et al., 2016). Bacillus strains were most
common calcifying isolates collected from Stiffes Cave (Ercole et al., 2001). Gamma-
Proteobacteria (45%) group is the most dominant group of bacteria investigated in caves
followed by Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria (Porter, 1971). Constitutive
production of carbonic anhydrase, urease and secretion of EPS are common features of many
species of soil bacteria (Moya et al., 2008; Burbank et al., 2011; Erecole et al., 2012).
The implementation of microbially produced calcium carbonate (CaCO3) in different industrial
and environmental applications has become an alternative for conventional approaches to induce
CaCO3 precipitation. However, there are many factors affecting the bio-mineralization of CaCO3,
which may restrict its application (Seifan et al., 2016). The effect of pH, temperature and
incubation time period was investigated on growth and calcium carbonate precipitation by all the
three isolates. B4 was the most common medium used in general organo- mineralization studies
and has been used to characterize mineral precipitation potential. More than 50% of environmental
bacteria are being tested to date are able to precipitate CaCO3 on B4, these include members of the
Bacillus, Arthrobacter, Kingella and Xanthomonas (Sprocati et al., 2008). In the present study,
the metabolic activity of bacterial strains and temperature are key factors in carbonate deposition.
The optimum temperature of 25°C have a positive effect on bacterial precipitation of calcite,
increasing the ability of the strains to form crystals. Laiz et al. (2003) reported bacteria from cave
soil samples were able to grow comparatively well in broad range of temperature (13-45°C). Based
on the results, pH dropped from 7 to 5 the enhanced precipitation of calcium carbonate was
observed which leads to enrichment of CO2, and NH4, consequently, acidifying the surrounding
(Gat et al., 2014). pH variation during the precipitation of CaCO3 which is due to factors including
(i) NH3(g) dissolution, (ii) CO2(g) dissolution, and (iii) acid generation during the bacterial
production of CaCO3 (Jiménez-López et al., 2001; Lopez et al., 2003). The process of precipitation
is a complex mechanism. This mechanism is a function of the cell concentration, ionic strength
and the pH of the medium. The media for the growth of the microorganisms are supplemented
with a calcium source such as calcium chloride which is precipitated as calcium carbonate. The
maximum precipitation was achieved by all the three isolates after incubation of 21-25 days.
Precipitation of calcium carbonate was observed on the basis of zone and crystals formation. After
proper incubation period the bacteria will attract the calcium toward its self-producing clear zones.
Later on the calcium is precipitated by mean of different exopolymeric substances (EPS) at the top
of media. Good results were obtained from Bacillus sp. GSN11. The crystal formation by
calcification was analyzed for further studies.
The carbonate crystals formed by the Bacillus sp. GSN11 were characterized by FTIR, XRD and
SEM. The aim was to investigate the crystals formation for calcium carbonate precipitation. SEM
analysis revealed the crystal size varied from 50 to 500 µm and crystalline structure that were seen
embedded. The SEM analysis revealed distinct calcite embedded in bacterial cells. The association
of calcite crystals with bacterial cells indicates that bacterial cells served as nucleation sites during
the bio-mineralization process (Chahal et al., 2011; Achal et al., 2009). X-ray diffraction results
showed that calcite is the major phase formed followed by aragonite and vaterite. XRD analysis
showed that carbonate formation form which the microbes were isolated are formed from pure
calcite (Ercole et al., 2001). Several studies have been conducted to understand the enigma behind
the formation of a variety of carbonate polymorphs, which are found to be dependent on different
factors such as growth media, substrate type, pH temperature, bacterial species, organic matter and
saturation index to [Ca2+]/[CO32−] ratio (Rodriguez-Navarro et al., 2012). Some authors also
reported that, in case of saline environments, calcite formation is inhibited and aragonite formation
increases with increasing concentration of Mg (Cailleau et al., 1977; Kitano et al., 1979; Sayoko
and Kitano, 1985). FTIR spectra of the sample were prepared from plate to find the nature of the
precipitated calcium carbonate crystals. The spectrum obtained from FTIR (400-400 cm-1) showed
substantial similarity to that of standard calcium carbonate crystals (control). The presence of
peaks at 1402.57, 871 and 712 cm-1 confirm the presence of calcium carbonate crystals formation.
Three major peaks observed due to vibration of carbon oxygen double bond in the carbonate ion
(Vahabi et al., 2015).
Conclusions
In this study we investigated the bio-mineralization of calcium carbonate by cave microbes. The
current study proved the feasibility of cave bacterial isolates in bio- mineralization and different
geochemical processes in cave formation and bio- cementation. The outcome of the current study
supports the potential of this technology for application in several fields such as remediation of
concrete structures and stabilization of beach sands.
Assessment of Kashmir Cave Bacterial Isolates for the Oxidation of Manganese (Mn) and
optimization of environmental parameters
Abstract
Mn (II) oxides are present abundantly in every environment, and very active in biogeochemical
cycle of nutrients, carbon, contaminants, and other elements. It is believing that bacteria play a key
role in Mn oxides precipitation in environment. Manganese oxidizing bacteria (MOB) are reported
mostly from marine or other aquatic environment, and few from terrestrial. The current knowledge
is on the precipitation of Mn oxides by five Kashmir cave bacterial isolates Bacillus pumilus C3,
B. safensis C6, B. pumilus C7, B.cereus C8 and B. acidiceler C11. These Mn(II) oxidizing bacterial
strains were isolated and purified on carbon rich K-medium. The Mn(II) oxidation by these isolated
bacterial strains was enzymatically controlled reaction. The activity of Mn(II) oxidation was
optimum at pH 5-7 and a temperature of 25-30oC and was lost at high temperature. Calcium ion
(Ca+2) concentration affected the Mn(II) oxidation dramatically, while the Zn and Cu ions had no
such high effect on the growth and Mn(II) oxidation. This demonstrates that cave bacteria are
involved in the production of biogenic manganese oxides in cave environment.
Key words: Mn Oxidation, Mn (II) oxides, , Kashmir cave, biomineralization
Introduction
Caves are colonized by variety of microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, algae and protozoans.
Bacteria could be present in cave water, surface and subsurface soil. They may attach to walls or
reside in guano. Hoeg, (1946), found microbes which were attached to the walls of Norwegian
caves. An earlier review on cave microorganisms was provided by Caumartin (1963). Most of the
microbes identified till today are either opportunistic or grow in suitable conditions (Dickson and
Kirk, 1976; James, 1994; Jones and Motyka, 1987). Many of the microbes inside the cave are
transient microbes i.e. they are brought inside the cave through water, sediment, air and animals.
Besides, they may form a parasitic relationship with troglobiotic animals and epibionts
(Golemansky and Bonnet, 1994). Cave explorers or humans going inside the cave may act as a
means of pathogen transfer from cave to outside environment (Li et al., 2010). Researchers and
tourists who deal with bats and cave guano are vulnerable to cave pathogens (Juardo et al., 2010).
Microorganisms are geologically substantial for a number of processes, such as mineral
decomposition, mineral formation, biogeochemical cycles and sedimentation. They decompose or
form minerals by the help of their enzymes or metabolic products. Their anabolic or catabolic
products, along with their respiratory mode (aerobic/anaerobic), either constitute or decay the
surroundings. Their mode of nutrition defines and distributes microbes into either
chemolithotrophs, the bacteria which utilizes inorganic products such as H2, Fe (II), Mn (II) and
H2S, or photolithotrophs, the sulfur deposits by assimilation of CO2 and utilization of H2S. In case
of aerobic mineralization of organic compounds, CO2, H2O, NO3¯, SO42¯, PO4
3¯, whereas
anaerobic mineralization results in the production of CH4, CO2, NH3, H2S, PO42¯ (Ehrlich, 2002).
Up till now, many studies have shown the connection of microorganisms with speleothems such
as carbonate, silicates, sulfur molecules, oxides of iron and manganese and compounds containing
potassium nitrate (Northup et al., 1997). Microorganisms carry out the process of precipitation
either in a passive manner through sites of nucleation (Went, 1969), or actively by yielding
enzymes that intern precipitate the minerals (Danielli and Edington, 1983). Metabolic by-products
resulted by acidification reaction of microbes can dissolute the cave topography. Microbial
interaction with cave topology gives the idea of general processes of precipitation and dissolution
that results in the genesis of different types of speleothems (Northup et al., 2000). Among these
processes, Mn oxidation occurs that play an essential role for the survival of microorganisms.
Manganese in Caves
The term ‘Mn oxides’ is collectively used for the oxides, hydroxides and oxyhydroxides, which
are highly reactive phases of mineral which play an important role in geochemical cycles of
elements. The Earth’s crust is composed of about 0.1% manganese (Nealson, 1983). In Earth’s
crust manganese secured fifth position in transition metals (Tebo et al., 2004). Manganese is
present in 7 different oxidation states extending from 0 to +7 while naturally it is present in +II,
+III and +IV states (Tebo et al. 1997, 2004). Mn have higher redox potential than iron due to which
the reduction of Mn is easier than Fe, and tough to oxidize than Fe (Kirchner and Grabowski,
1972).
Oxyhydroxides are found in abundant after sulfate and carbonate minerals in caves. Many reports
are available which showed the presence of iron and manganese in abundant form in caves (Hill
and Fort, 1997; White et al., 2009; Gazquez et al., 2011) to irregular surfaces on the walls usually
on top of visibly altered carbonates (Northup et al., 2003; Spilde et al., 2005; Gazquez et al.,
2012a). With carbonate and silicate speleothems, sulfur compounds, oxides of iron and manganese
and saltpeter, the microbial associations have been reported (Northup et al. 1997). Manganese
compounds are present in caves as in clastic deposit form layer on wall or speleothems (Gascoin
1982; Hill 1982) or as crust (Jones 1992: Moore 1981). In cave, manganese is present in the form
of birnessite very common (Hill and Forti, 1997), and some low quantity of crystals oxides and
hydroxides like pyrolusite, chalcophanite, cryptomelane, hausmannite, romanechite, rancieite,
todorokite and rhodochrosite are also reported (Onac et al.1997a; Onac et al. 1997b). From karst
solutional cavity, the manganese is also isolated (Jones, 1992). Peck (1986) and Northup et al.
(2003) provided evidences that manganese oxides reported from caves are almost biogenic in
nature. Mn (IV) oxide are present in aquatic as well as in terrestrial environment (Post, 1999).
Manganese oxidation by cave microorganisms
The cavernicoles play important role in mineral precipitation either actively by producing enzymes
or other metabolites which change the microenvironment (Danielli and Edington 1983), or
passively by acting as nucleation site (Went, 1969). Cave microbes also play an important role in
cave dissolution by producing the acid as a byproduct (Ehrlich, 1996).
Manganese is a vital trace element that is required by all living organisms. It acts as a cofactor in
a variety of enzymatic processes that are necessary for metabolic activities and antioxidant, as well
as superoxide dismutase and photosystem II (Tebo et al., 2004). Generally, Mn is found in three
oxidative states. In surface environment Mn is found as soluble reduced form Mn (II), and also in
oxidized form as Mn (IV). In between these two species of manganese, an intermediate oxidizes
phase on Mn also occurs as Mn (III) that can form complex bonds with organic compounds
(Madison et al., 2013). Mn cycle occurs between these three states and it has a direct role in
environmental health as well as on humans. The oxidized species of manganese i.e. Mn (III/IV)
has a major impact on the fate of several nutrients along with pollutants (Spiro et al., 2010;
Geszvain et al., 2012). Mn (III) also oxidizes carbon compounds and metals (Trouwborst et al.,
2006; Madison et al., 2013). Even though Mn oxidation can occurs through abiotic reactions but
the efficiency and production of Mn oxides is more in biological processes because
microorganisms have the capability to oxidize Mn (II) at quicker kinetic rate than abiotic processes
(Nealson et al., 1988; Tebo, 1991). Those bacterial species that are adequate to oxidize Mn (II)
(Tebo et al., 2004; Tebo et al., 2005) through several pathways using enzymes, such as multicopper
oxidases (Corstjens et al., 1997; Dick et al., 2008; Butterfield et al., 2013; Geszvain et al., 2013;
Su et al., 2013), heme-peroxidase (Anderson et al., 2009), and two-component regulative protein
(Geszvain and Tebo, 2010). Although biogenic Mn oxidation is known, the physiological purpose
of bacterial manganese oxidation is not yet acknowledged (Learman et al., 2014). At neutral pH,
abiotic Mn oxidation occurs and results in the production of phyllomanganate forms of bernessite
mineral group that has hexagonal or triclinic structure having poor crystalline Mn oxide to
crystalline bernessite.
Microorganisms of caves are capable of producing extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) and
some other metabolites with acidic functional groups, which stress the pH lowering due to metal
oxidation. Due to deprotonation of organic functional group, the cell walls of bacteria have
negative charges at low pH, which may act as nucleating sites for the cation like iron and
manganese (Fein, 2009).
Under optimum pH conditions, manganese is thermodynamically oxidized through reactive
oxygen species (ROS) super oxide (O−2). In the previous studies, scavenging of superoxide through
Mn oxides has also been reported (Barnese et al., 2008) because Mn (II) is very significant
antioxidant in natural processes. Its nano molar levels have been observed in sea water that could
scavenge superoxide which leads to a fast Mn cycle (Hansard et al., 2011). Conversely, another
study showed that superoxide, in the presence of organic carbon can induce Mn (II) oxidation at
faster rate (Nico et al., 2002). During this reaction Mn (II) is oxidized and superoxide is reduced
to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).
Mn (II) + O−2 + 2H+ → Mn (III) + H2O2
Enzymatically superoxide production and its effect on manganese oxidation has been observed in
marine bacteria as well, including Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b, Roseobacter clade (Learman et al.,
2011). This manganese oxidation through biological superoxide leads to the formation of
manganese intermediate Mn (III). In fungi, ascomycetes have been studied to oxidize manganese
Mn (II) with the aid of extracellular superoxide (Learman, 2013; Hansel et al., 2012; Tang et al.,
2013).
In the ecosystem, biogenic manganese oxidation has also been affected by a variety of ions.
However, there is brief knowledge about the role of these ions on kinetics of manganese oxidation
by bacteria. Previous studies have shown the effect of Ca2+ concentration on manganese oxidation
in Bacillus sp., whereas K+, Na+, Sr2 and NO3- ions had no effect. At 10 mM Ca2+ concentration,
Mn (II) oxidation was increased up to 4-5 times. Studies have suggested that calcium ions have a
direct role on Mn oxidizing enzymes by possibly increasing the bridge amongst polypeptide
components (Toyoda et al., 2013).
As Mn oxidants are extremely reactive species and can carry out oxidation-reduction reactions at
broad range of pH. These redox reactions have an essential role in bioavailability and mobility of
toxic heavy metals including Cu, Ni, Co, Pb, Ba, Zn, Ag, Hg and Tl (Sherman and Peacock, 2010;
Peacock and Moon, 2012). Up till now, little studies have been done on Mn oxidation at low pH
however it is necessary to evaluate biogenic efficiency of Mn precipitation at low pH because most
of the mining processes are characterized by acidic pH. Some Streptomyces sp. have been reported
to oxidize Mn at pH ranging from 4.5-5, whereas Chlorococcum humicolum algae and
Cephalosporium sp. of fungi is capable of oxidizing Mn (II) at pH 4.5. In another study, Mn oxides
could immobilize heavy metals in biogeochemical barrier layers formed during Mn oxidation at
low pH (4.7 to 5.1). The bacterial samples were isolated from a former mining area of uranium.
Six bacterial species were found to produce hexagonal bernessite Mn oxide in its layers, which
could immobilize Ba, Cu, Ni, Zn, Co, Cd and Ce. These bacteria were Bacillus safensis, Bacillus
altitudinis, Bravibacilllus reuszeri (Gram positive spore formers), Arthobacter and
Frondihabitans (Gram positive Actinobacteria) and Sphingomonas (Proteobacteria).
Fig.4.1. Mn
cycle of oxidation states found in nature
The biogenic manganese oxides are highly influenced by factors which determine its oxidation
state. The Mn(II) oxidation is naturally thermodynamically favorable reaction but a very slow
process (Diem and Stumm, 1984; Nealson et al., 1988). The abiotic oxidation of Mn(II) is a very
slow process and catalyzed by environmental conditions like high pH and high oxygen pressure,
or the oxidation of Mn(II) is also catalyzed by adsorption of Mn(II) ions on mineral surfaces such
as iron oxides and silicates (Morgan and Stumm, 1964; Sung and Morgan, 1981; Hem and Lind,
1983; Murray et al., 1985; Davies and Morgan, 1989). In the presence of reducing agents and in
anaerobic condition, low pH, or in Mn(II) complexing agents, Mn(IV) is reduced to Mn(III)(II).
Fig. 4.2.
Four
possible
mechanisms of Mn+2 oxidation by bacteria.
Enzymatic Mechanism of Bacterial Mn(II) Oxidation
From the advancement in identification of enzymes involved in Mn+2 oxidation produced by
bacteria and the mechanism by which the oxidation occurs, many questions remain debatable. The
involvement of multicopper oxidase enzymes in the oxidation of Mn+2 must be differentiate from
actual direct catalysis of Mn+2 oxidation by multicopper oxidase enzymes (MCO). While in the
study of Leptothrix discophora has a potential link made between Mn oxidase and gene responsible
for the coding of multicopper oxidase enzymes (MCO) (Corstjens et al., 1997). Bacterial Mn
oxidase enzyme has not been purified in quantity for detailed biochemical investigation, and no
MCO encoding gene is successfully expressed to produce functional enzymes in foreign host. Thus
the direct involvement of MCO in Mn+2 oxidation is a hypothesis. In spite of it seems debatable
that MCO in bacteria could directly involve in Mn+2 oxidation because (a) genetic and biochemical
studies showed the involvement of MCO in Mn+2 oxidation in many unrelated bacteria, (b) some
MCO isolated from eukaryotic are known to oxidize Mn(II) directly (Hofer and Schlosser, 1999;
Schlosser and Hofer, 2002), and (c) the Fe(II) oxidizing MCO occur in both eukaryotes (Solomon
et al., 1996) and bacteria (Kim et al., 2001; Huston et al., 2002).
Fig.4.3. Enzymatic pathway of Mn(II) oxidation
Importance of Mn oxide
Manganese oxides are important because Mn (III/IV) act as cofactor and are responsible for a
number of redox reactions. They are also utilized as trace nutrients. In aquatic system,
photosynthetic organisms require Mn oxides in the photosystem II and water molecule is split to
obtain energy and thus Mn stores oxygen in surrounding environment. Even though manganese
was considered biochemically important, its cycle is not completely reported therefore it lead to
the further studies of the ionic species of manganese. In a recent study, Mn speciation was
identified by filtration method, in which a sample containing manganese was passed through 0.2
µm filter. Dissolved portion was rich in Mn (II) whereas the unfiltered fraction contained soluble
form of Mn (III/IV) i.e. oxidation speciation of manganese. Previously Mn (III) was considered
thermodynamically unstable and its efficiency was neglected. Nevertheless, in a study conducted
by Luther (2010), Mn (III) was found significant for such redox reactions in which one electron is
transferred from donor to acceptor molecule. During the process of oxidation, when the transfer of
an electron occurs between Mn (II) and Mn (IV), Mn (III) acts as an intermediate ionic state that
overcomes the ionic orbital distance. Mn (III) state occurs for a short period of time but when
provided with a ligand, Mn (III) state is stable because in complexes Mn (III) ions have higher
electrostatic charge and shorter radius than Mn (II) or Mn (IV). Mn (III) also has higher bonding
affinity with siderophore than Fe (III) and thus competes with Fe (III) and decreases its uptake in
microorganisms and plants (Oldham et al., 2015).
In addition to heavy metal immobilization, Mn oxides are also being used for pollution degradation
and dye removal in waste water treatment plants. Besides, Mn oxides combined with gold
nanoparticles are used to remove volatile organic compounds (VOC) from atmosphere. In case of
VOC removal, Mn oxides efficiently remove hexane, toluene, nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides,
are major compounds present in polluted air (Sinha et al., 2007). Organic dye present in water
have led to water contamination and is a huge source of environmental pollution. Due to the
physiochemical properties of manganese oxides (Mn III/IV), several studies have been carried out
for efficient dye removal through absorption and catalytic breakdown processes. Studies have
reported the degradation of RhB dye through redox reaction using Mn (III/IV) oxides having
different crystalline structures. Even at low pH (2-6), alpha, beta and gamma structures of
manganese oxides can decolorize RhB by cleaving ethyl groups, degradation of carboxylic group
(–COOH) and finally complete mineralization to produce CO2, H2O, NO3-, SO4
2- and NH4+ (Cui
et al., 2015). In a recent study, methylene blue and methyl orange dye degradation has been
achieved using MnO2 coated diatomite. Fabricated Mn oxides have the potency to treat waste
water, and remediation of ecosystem (Trung et al., 2016). In another study MnO2 based
micromotor were used to have double effect, i.e. dye degradation and bubble separation through
absorption. This dual technique resulted in decolorization of dye in waste water more than 90%.
This revealing the efficiency of Mn oxide micromotors, for the treatment of waste and portable
water reservoirs for removal of dyes (Wani et al., 2015).
Material and Methods
The study is about manganese oxidation by bacterial strains isolated from soil and speleothem
collected from Kashmir (smast) cave (Fig.4.4). The cave is located in the Babozai mountain
located between District Mardan and Buner having coordinates (34o25’42.12”N 72o13’10.82”E).
The length of Kashmir cave is 188 meters, and width is ~ 29 meters. The height of entrance zone
is about 30 meters and higher in twilight and dark zone. Kashmir cave is a series of limestone
caves. Like other caves, it has low temperature i.e. 10oC and pH of 5-6. The surface was wet due
to drifting of water from the cave ceiling. Speleothems, secondary metabolites were formed from
entrance to dark zone.
Fig.4.4. Kashmir Smast (Cave) entrance zone
Sampling
In August 2015, soil and speleothem samples were collected from Kashmir cave. The soil and
speleothems samples were collected from the dark zone of cave. Soil samples were collected from
the surface layer (at depth of 0 cm to 50 cm). While the speleothem samples were collected from
the ceiling of cave. All the soil and speleothem samples were stored in sterile zipper bags, placed
in an ice bath, transported to laboratory and kept at 4oC until used for experiments.
Fig.4.5. Speleothems isolated from Kashmir smast (Cave)
Isolation of Mn(II)-oxidizing bacteria
The glassware used in whole research was acid washed for 24 hours in 2 M HCl and rinsed with
milli-Q water. For isolation of manganese oxidizing bacterial strains from the cave soil samples,
1 g soil sample was serially diluted in normal saline and then was spread on K medium plates,
aseptically. Then plates were incubated aerobically at 35°C. Brown coloured colonies were
isolated and purified on fresh K medium plates. For the confirmation of the ability of manganese
oxidation by these bacterial strains, drops of 0.04% (w/v) leucoberbelin blue solution in 45mM
acetic acid was added on the colonies. Formation of blue color due to the reaction of LBB with
Mn(III/IV) oxides, confirm the ability of these microbes to oxidize manganese.
Similarly, the bacterial strains were isolated from speleothem by sprinkling the speleothem powder
on nutrient agar plate and purified the cultured bacterial strains.
Screening of bacteria for the Mn oxidation
All the isolated bacterial strains were grown on defined medium i.e. K agar medium plates,
containing FeSO4.7H2O (0.001 g/l), MnCl2 (0.2 g/l), peptone (2.0 g/l), yeast extract (0.5 g/l), and
10 mM HEPES buffer (N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-2-ethanesulfonic acid; pH 7.5). For the Mn
oxidizers, Lecoberbelin Blue (LBB) was used as indicator. LBB was prepared by suspending
0.04% LBB in 45 mM acetic acid. K medium was prepared by adding 25 µL of 100 µM MnCl2
and 5 ml HEPES buffer in autoclaved 500 ml of deionized water having 0.5 g of peptone, 0.3 g of
yeast and 2% of agar. The plates were incubated at 15oC for 48 hrs. After incubation, few drops of
LBB were poured on bacterial colonies for the confirmation of Mn oxidizers.
Screening of Mn(II) oxidzation bacterial strains
For the production of biogenic manganese oxide, 2 ml cultures at log phase were inoculated in a
volume of 75 ml of organic rich K broth medium in a 300 ml flask, and incubated in a shaker
incubator of 150 rpm and at 25oC for 60 hours. Control was also incubated without inoculating
bacterial strains. About 0.3 ml of sample was taken after every 4 hours for the detection of
manganese oxidation during the growth process. Lecoberbelin blue (LBB) solution of 0.9 ml was
added to 0.3 ml of growing cells at a ratio of 3:1 and incubated at temperature of 25oC for 15
minutes in dark condition. After incubation, the sample was centrifuged for 5 minutes at 10,000
rpm. The supernatants were taken in a cuvette and measured its absorbance by using UV-Vis at
620 nm. For the establishment of calibration curve, potassium permanganate was used. While in a
control, K broth medium and LBB was used. Growth curve was checked by growing the culture
in K broth medium and measuring the growth at 600 nm.
Molecular identification of Mn oxidizers
DNA extraction
DNA extraction was performed by centrifuging 1 ml of broth culture at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes,
cells were pelleted out. The pelleted cells were rinsed twice in 400 µL TE buffer after removing
the supernatant. After rinsing, the cells were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes, the pellets
were resuspended in 200 µL TE buffer.
Then 100 µL Tris-saturated phenol (pH 8.0) was added to these tubes, followed by a vortex-mixing
step of 60 sec, to lyse the cells. To remove the aqueous phase from organic phase, the samples
were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm at 4°C for 5 minutes. Then 1.5 ml tube was taken and 160 μl of
upper aqueous phase was poured to it. About 40 µL of TE buffer was added to make 200 µL and
mixed with 100 µL of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1) and centrifuged for 5 min at 13,000 rpm
at 4°C. Chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1) extraction was used for the purification of lysate, when
there was no longer a white interface, and the same method was repeated twice or thrice. Purified
DNA was present in the aqueous phase and was stored at -20°C for further use.
Preparation of the Agarose Gel
About 1.5 g of agarose in 1x TBE, was kept in microwave oven for making the gel. Then 2-5 μl
ethidium bromide was added to this agarose solution and mixed by shaking. It was then transferred
to gel tray and wells were made in the gel for loading samples by inserting a comb in the liquid
gel. It was allowed to solidify for about 15 minutes. About 1 μl of loading dye and 5 μl of
supernatant were mixed and loaded on agarose gel (1.5%). The gel was run for a period of 45 min
at 110 V and 400 mA and visualized under UV.
Phylogenetic analysis
Phylogenetic analysis was carried out to study sequences using ClustalW program implemented
in MEGA4.0 (Thompson et al., 1994). The similar sequences were downloaded from NCBI. All
sequences were aligned and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using Neighbor Joining method
in MEGA 4.0 bootstrap analysis (1000 replicate) was used for the significance of the generated
tree.
Examination of soluble extracellular oxidation
For the examination of extracellular Mn(II) oxidation, all the Mn(II) oxidizing strains were grown
up to mid log phase and then filtered in sterile condition. After filtration, 100µM of Mn(II) was
added and incubated at 30oC and centrifuged at 150 rpm for 48 hrs. Sample was taken after every
4 hr to check for Mn(II) oxidation by adding 0.9 ml of LBB to 0.3 ml, and measured its absorbance
by using UV-Vis at 620 nm.
Examination of superoxide oxidation (SOD)
For the confirmation of oxidation by superoxide dismutase (SOD), two sets of K broth medium
one containing 100 µM of MnCl2 and 1 µM SOD and the second contained 100 µM MnCl2 and 5
µM SOD was inoculated with mid log phase culture and incubated at 25oC and 150 rpm for 60 hr.
The SOD was syringe filtered into the medium. The control was K broth without SOD. The Mn(II)
oxidation was examined by measuring the absorbance after every 4 hr of incubation at 620 nm on
UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The experiment was run in duplicate.
Effect of temperature on Mn(II) oxidation
To check the optimum temperature for Mn(II) oxidation by isolated strains, all five isolates were
grown at 25oC and 30oC in duplicate in liquid K medium in a shaker incubator at 150 rpm. Mn(II)
oxidation was checked by measuring the formation of manganese oxides in a quantitative LBB
colorimetric assay after every 4 hr of growth by adding LBB at a ratio of 3:1 to the centrifuged
samples. The absorbance of the Mn(II) oxide produced was measured at 620 nm on a UV-Vis
spectrophotometer.
Effect of pH on Mn(II) oxidation
Effect of pH on the ability of bacterial strains to oxidize Mn was determined by growing them on
modified K agar medium (adjusted to pH 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) plates. The pH of the medium was
adjusted by adding NaOH or HCl. Plates were incubated at 25oC and the growth was checked
visually, while the oxidation of Mn(II) was confirmed by adding LBB spot test.
Effect of metal ions on Mn (II) oxidation by bacteria
Tolerance of the isolated strains to copper, zinc and calcium concentration was evaluated in K
broth medium. All the five strains were cultured in duplicate. Zinc, copper, and calcium were
added in the growth medium at final concentration of 100 µM and inoculated by the selected
isolates and incubated for 36 hrs at 25oC. Growth was measured by determining optical density at
600 nm (OD600). Mn(II) oxidation by the isolates was evaluated by measuring production of Mn
oxides through quantitative LBB colorimetric assay after 48 h of growth. About 0.1 ml of
centrifuged sample was added to 0.3 ml of LBB and the mixture was incubated in dark for 15 min
at room temperature. After incubation, absorbance of the reaction was measured at 620 nm on a
UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Standard curve was plotted with KMnO4.
Results
Manganese (Mn) is an essential metal which is not easily oxidized like iron. Many bacterial strains
have the ability to oxidize Mn(II) to Mn(III/IV) five times faster than chemical oxidation. Mn
oxides are strongest oxidants next to oxygen in aquatic environment. Mn oxidizing bacteria
produce enzymes which not only help to scavange Mn but also other associated elements, thus
playing an important role in biogeochemical cycles. In this study we present the isolation of
bacterial strains from Kashmir cave having the ability of Mn(II) oxidation to Mn(III/IV).
Isolation of Mn(II) oxidizing bacteria
For the isolation of Mn(II) oxidizing bacteria from Kashmir cave soil and speleothem samples, K
agar medium was used. About 30 different bacteria were isolated from soil and 4 from the pinkish
layer of speleothem. Among 30 soil bacterial isolates, 5 were positive for oxidization of Mn(II) in
initial screening, while 3 of 4 from the speleothem were also Mn(II) oxidizers (Table 4.1).
Table. 4.1. Mn(II) oxidizing Bacteria Isolated from Kashmir cave soil and speleothem.
Bacterial isolates from Kashmir cave soil Bacterial isolates from Kashmir cave speleothem
S.No. Isolate Strain Isolate Strain
1 C 3 Bacillus pumilus S 1 Bacillus cereus
2 C 6 Bacillus safensis S 2 Bacillus cereus
3 C 7 Bacillus pumilus S 4 Bacillus cereus
4 C 8 Bacillus cereus
5 C 11 Bacillus acidiceler
On basis of ICP-MS analysis of the soil, the Kashmir cave soil contains 0.246% wt of manganese.
The pH of the soil was 5-6. All the isolates showed the oxidation of Mn(II) by a positive LBB spot
test. Initial confirmation was performed by plate assay shown in (Fig 4.6). The color of the isolates
on K agar medium plate was brown, and after adding 2-3 drops of LBB on the colonies the color
was changed to bluish.
Fig. 4.6. Initial screening of Mn(II) oxidizing bacterial strains from cave soil.
Stereoscopic confirmation
The ability of the Mn(II) oxidation was also confirmed by stereoscopy. The color of the colonies
was changed to brown by adding LBB shown in (Fig 4.7).
Fig. 4.7. Stereoscopy of the isolates.
Molecular identification of isolated Mn(II) oxidizing bacteria
Bands of extracted DNA from Mn(II) oxidizers isolates from Kashmir cave soil and speleothem
were clearly observed on gel when subjected to UV illuminator, shown in (Fig 4.8)
Fig 4.8. DNA bands of Mn(II) oxidizing isolates.
Phylogenetic Analysis of Mn oxide producers
The sequences from 16S rRNA gene obtained from Macrogen Incorporation were used for BLAST
in NCBI gene bank database, which revealed Mn(II) oxidizers belong to genus Bacillus. The
phylogenetic tree was constructed through MWGA5 software (Fig 4.9).
Fig. 4.9. Phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood method
Evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on Tamura-
Nei model (Tamura and Nei, 1993). Tree with the highest log likelihood (-1391.0539) is shown in
Fig. (4.9). The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to
the branches. Initial tree for the heuristic search was obtained automatically as follows. When the
number of common sites was < 100 or less than one fourth of the total number of sites, the
maximum parsimony method was used; otherwise BIONJ method with MCL distance matrix was
used. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per
site. The analysis involved 11 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1 st + 2nd + 3rd
+ Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total
of 740 positions in the final data set. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5 (Tamura
et al., 2011).
Bacillus pumilus (KR780404)
Bacillus pumilus (KR528376)
Bacillus pumilus (KR780437)
Bacillus pumilus (CP000813)
Bacillus pumilus (KT273321)
Bacillus pumilus (KT624615)
Bacillus pumilus (KT624616)
Bacillus safensis (KP235236)
Bacillus pumilus (KP235237)
Bacillus pumilus (KP235238)
Bacillus safensis (KT719214)
C3
C6
Bacillus pumilus (LN890660)
C7
Bacillus acidiceler (KU254664)
Bacillus acidiceler (LN890177)
C11
C8
Bacillus cereus (KT720292)
Bacillus cereus (KT720291)
Bacillus cereus (KT719760)
100
100
98
100
0.005
Growth curves of Mn(II) oxidizing cave isolates
Due to the presence of Mn in cave soil, the cavernicoles (cave microbes) have intrinsic capability to oxidize
Mn(II) to Mn(III/IV). The optimum conditions were checked for the production of Mn oxides by these
isolates. The isolates from speleothem showed low ability of Mn(II) oxidation therefore were not processed
further. Soil isolates showed more oxidation of Mn(II) as compared to bacteria from speleothem. Soil
isolates were grown in K broth medium and their growth was checked at O.D600 after every 4 hours of
incubation. Growth was checked in the presence and absence of MnCl2, after adding 1 and 5 µM of Super
Oxide Dismutase (SOD) and 100 µM of calcium acetate in K broth medium. The growth of all isolates is
shown in (Fig. 4.10).
Fig. 4.10a. Growth curves of Bacillus pumilus C3 at 30oC and 25oC (No Mn 600, 30oC and
No Mn 600, 25oC), in the presence of MnCl2 (Mn600, 30oC), after adding 1 and 5 M of
Super Oxides Dismutase (SOD) (Mn+SOD1,600. Mn+SOD5,600), and in the presence of
100M Calcium acetate (Mn+Ca, 600).
Fig. 4.10b. Growth curves of Bacillus Safensis C6 at 30oC and 25 oC (No Mn600, 30oC and
No Mn600, 25oC), in the presence of MnCl2 (Mn600, 30oC), after adding 1 and 5 M of
Super Oxides Dismutase (SOD) (Mn+SOD1,600. Mn+SOD5,600), and in the presence of
100M Calcium acetate (Mn+Ca, 600).
Fig. 4.10c. Growth curves of Bacillus pumilus C7 at 30oC and 25 oC (No Mn600, 30oC and
No Mn600, 25oC), in the presence of MnCl2 (Mn600, 30oC), after adding 1 and 5 M of
Super Oxides Dismutase (SOD) (Mn+SOD1,600. Mn+SOD5,600), and in the presence of
100M Calcium acetate (Mn+Ca, 600).
Fig. 4.10d. Growth curves of Bacillus cereus C8 at 30oC and 25 oC (No Mn600, 30 oC and
No Mn600, 25oC), in the presence of MnCl2 (Mn600, 30oC), after adding 1 and 5 M of
Super Oxides Dismutase (SOD) (Mn+SOD1,600. Mn+SOD5,600), and in the presence of
100M Calcium acetate (Mn+Ca, 600).
Fig. 4.10e. Growth curves of Bacillus acidiceler C11 at 30oC and 25 oC (No Mn600, 30 oC
and No Mn600, 25oC), in the presence of MnCl2 (Mn600, 30oC), after adding 1 and 5 M of
Super Oxides Dismutase (SOD) (Mn+SOD1,600. Mn+SOD5,600), and in the presence of
100M Calcium acetate (Mn+Ca, 600).
Examination of soluble extracellular oxidation
After 48 hrs of reaction, no visible biogenic Mn oxide production was observed. Addition of
colorimetric dye, leucoberbalin blue (LBB), which oxidizes and changes to blue color in the
presence of Mn(III) and Mn(IV), showed no reaction, confirming the lack of Mn oxidation.
Examination of Superoxide oxidation (SOD)
Following 36 hrs of experiment, no visible changes in the precipitation of Mn oxides were
observed in the presence and absence of SOD, or change in color of LBB after adding it to the
reaction solution (Fig. 4.12). The results confirm that the production of Mn oxide is enzymatic not
chemical.
Optimization of Mn oxide production
Ability of the cave isolates to precipitate Mn oxide was dependent on pH of the medium and
growth phases. Mn oxidation was checked at different pH like 5, 6 and 7 and they all showed
growth at range of 5 – 7 pH, similarly Mn oxidizers were checked at different temperature and
optimally grew at temperature 25 and 30oC. B. cereus C8 and B. acidiceler C11 showed maximum
oxidation under pH and in the presence of various Ca+2 concentrations. Whereas, less ability of
Mn(II) oxidation was observed in case of B. pumilus C3, B. safensis C6 and B. pumilus C7 (Fig.
4.11). The optimum Mn(II) metabolism was observed at 25oC (Fig. 4.12).
Fig. 4.11. Variation in Mn(II) oxidation at different pH and Ca+2 ion concentration.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
0/5.0 1/5.0 5/5.0 0/6.0 1/6.0 5/6.0 0/7.0 1/7.0 5/7.0
Mn
ox
ida
tio
n r
ate
(µ
M/h
)
Ca+2 conc (µM) in pH
Mn Oxidation at different pH and Ca+2 concentration
B. pumilus C3
B. Safensis C6
B. pumilus C7
B. cereusC8
B. acidiceler C11
(a) B. pumilus C3
(b) B. safensis C6
(c) B. pumilus C7
(d) B. cereus C8
(e) B. acidicelar C11
Fig. 4.12. Mn(II) oxidation capacity and Mn(III,IV) oxide concentration as a function of
reaction time in C rich media K-medium. The ages of the Mn oxide were from 4 h to 36 h.
Effect of metals (Zn, Cu and Ca) on Mn oxide precipitation by Cave bacteria
Growth of the isolates was affected by the tested metals, with direct effect on Mn oxide
precipitation. Growth and Mn(II) oxidation by Kashmir cave isolates was very low in early stage
of incubation in the presence of zinc and copper ions but after Growth and Mn oxidation by
bacteria increased after 18 h of incubation. Ca+2 dramatically encourage the growth and Mn oxide
formation (Fig. 4.13).
Fig. 4.13. Effect of metals on Mn oxide production by cavernicoles after 24 h of incubation.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Mn Mn+Ca Mn+Zn Mn+Cu
O.D
(620)n
m
Mn+Metals
Effect of metals on Mn oxidation
B. pumilus C3
B. safensis C6
B. pumilus C7
B. cereus C8
B. acidicelar C11
Discussion
The presence of Mn oxides and oxyhydroxides which are insoluble, are a good sign for the
microbial activities (Mann et al., 1990). The reported biogenic Mn oxides produced by bacteria in
laboratory are dominantly Mn(IV) as opposed to lower oxidation states (Tebo et al., 1997). The
biogenic Mn oxidation is a significant process for the production of biosignature, because at neutral
pH the abiotic Mn(II) oxidation is kinetically very slow mechanism. Microbes play a key role in
the oxidation of Mn(II) in terrestrial environments because they speed up the rate of Mn(II)
oxidation (Nealson et al., 1988).
In most terrestrial environments, manganese accompanies iron in mineral suites, because together
they play an important role in lives of many microorganisms (Ghiorse and Ehrlich, 1992). From
cave environments, manganese minerals are also reported occur with iron minerals. At pH>6, the
abiotic oxidation of soluble Fe(II) occurs very rapidly because it is highly pH dependent reaction.
On the other hand, the reduction of Fe(III) and Mn(IV) is not favored thermodynamically under
oxic conditions but may readily occur under low pH (Nealson et al., 1983).
Mostly Mn(II) oxidizing bacteria have been reported from marine environments, only a few
number of bacterial strains have been isolated from terrestrial environments which have the ability
of Mn(II) oxidation. The gene responsible for the Mn(II) oxidation has not been identified from
soil bacteria (Waasbergen, et al., 1996). Thus the soil-borne bacteria specially from cave
environment needs to be investigated for the Mn(II) oxidation. For this investigation various
culturable cave bacterial strains should be isolated from cave soil for the mechanistic studies of
biogenic manganese oxidation in cave environment. In present study, soil samples were collected
aseptically from Kashmir Cave in which Mn was found 0.24 wt%. The Kashmir cave soil sample
(nutrients limited and pH 5-6) was first time studied for the diversity of culturable bacterial strains
having the capability of Mn(II) oxidation. The culturable bacterial strains on K-medium showed
the Mn(II) oxidizing activities. Most reports on the production of biogenic Mn oxides production,
the pH has been maintained at neutral or alkaline. We isolated manganese oxidizing bacteria
(MOB) from the nutrient limited and acidic soil of pH 5.5. Five bacterial strains were isolated, and
characterized by 16S rRNA. The isolates were assigned into a single cluster or phyla firmicutes
Bacillus pumilus C3, Bacillus safensis C6, Bacillus pumilus C7, Bacillus cereus C8 and Bacillus
acidiceler C11. Bacillus are spore forming bacteria and able to oxidise Mn after initiating spore
forming (Mayanna et al., 2015). Bacillus genera belongs to -proteobacteria which grow at low
nutrients availability and play a key role in biogeochemical cycles for their energy. Several other
MOB have also been reported from other bacterial phyla, like actinobacteria, and proteobacteria
(Santelli et al., 2014; Akob et al., 2014), and some studies on biogenic manganese oxides
production in laboratory by using different bacterial strains including L. discophora SS-1 (Nelson et
al., 1999), P. putida GB-1 (Tebo et al., 2005; Zhu et al., 2010), Bacillus SG-1 (Webb et al., 2005a), P.
putida MnB1 (Villalobos et al., 2003) and Acremonium sp. KR21-2 (Tanaka et al., 2010).
The isolated MOB strains from Kashmir cave soil (pH 5) showed growth and Mn(II) oxidation at
low pH 5. These strains also showed the ability of Mn(II) oxidation till neutral pH 7. One of the
possible reason for these microbes to carried out Mn(II) oxidation on neutral and acidic pH may
be due to the adaptation of these microbes to the extreme environment with in caves, with retain
in their capability to grow at neutral pH as well. At low pH bacterial Mn(II) oxidation is a unique
character of bacteria. In acidic condition, the Mn(II) oxidation is predicted to be
thermodynamically unfavorable (Tebo, et al., 2007; Nealson, 2006). Mn oxides precipitation by
bacteria at neutral or slightly alkaline pH (from 7 to 9) is thermodynamically favorable but this
process is very slow in the absence of bacterial colonies. At low pH a large activation energy is
required, which may not be suitable for the bacterial strains, especially Mn oxidation by microbes
is not thought to provide energy for cell (Tebo et al., 2004).
Mn(II) oxidation is enzymatically controlled reaction (Ehrlich, 1968). From the present study it
was revealed that all the Kashmir cave isolates oxidized Mn(II) enzymatically not chemically. By
using the molecular biological techniques in the field of Mn(II) oxidation, the report was led to
identification of involvement of many genes in Mn(II) oxidation. From this reports it was the first
report of using same tools by different bacteria in Mn(II) oxidizing process (Brouwers et al., 2000).
Reports from the three Mn(II) oxidizing bacteria suggest that multicopper oxidases (MCO) play a
key role in the Mn(II) oxidizing systems in bacterial strains. The sequence of the Mn(II) oxidizing
protein have similarity to MCO enzyme were involved in Mn(II) oxidation (Larsen et al., 1999).
Geszvain et al., (2013) reported a cluster of gene from P. putida GB-1 which regulates the
oxidation of Mn(II). The reported clusters were composed of PputGB1_2447 and PputGB1_2665
which encode two MCO enzymes, each one can independently oxidize Mn(II) and Mn(III). In
different Alphaproteobacteria specie other pathways of Mn(II) oxidation are observed other than
MCO enzyme like A. manganoxydans SI85-9A1 is catalyzed by mopA, heme peroxidase like
enzyme (Anderson et al., 2009), while superoxide pathway is using by Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b
(Learman et al., 2011).
Metals ions affect the growth and Mn (II) oxidation capability of microorganisms (Miyata et al.,
2007). We examined the metals tolerance of the Bacillus pumilus C3, Bacillus safensis C6,
Bacillus pumilus C7, Bacillus cereus C8 and Bacillus acidiceler C11. All the five strains grew and
oxidized Mn(II) in the presence of Ca+2 while the growth and oxidation ability was very low in the
presence of zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) ions in initial incubation time but after incubation of 16hr
these strains start growth and Mn(II) oxidation. In Kashmir cave soil calcium is most abundant
element (21.11% wt), while Zn and Cu are in less quantity (0.047 and 0.032 wt%). However, the
isolated strains tolerated higher concentration of metals than what typically inhibits Mn(II)
oxidation by model MOB strain Leptothrix discophora SS-1 [Zn(II) at 10 µM and Cu(II) at 100
µM] (Miyata et al., 2007). From this report we suggest that Kashmir cave Mn oxidizing bacteria
are well adapted to the metals contaminated environment.
Calcium ion have a dramatic effect on the growth and Mn(II) oxidation by Kashmir cave
isolates. The Ca+2 ions bind to the MnxG enzyme on the spore coat of Bacillus sp.SG-1 at low
pH which affects the conformation and activity of enzymes which conclude the role of Ca+2 in
MCO. The Mn(II) oxidation rate in the presence of Ca+2 is two and a half time higher in
magnitude than that of Ca+2 free condition
Conclusions
• The Kashmir cave was first time explored microbiologically.
• Total 34 bacterial strains were isolated from different samples on the basis of colony
morphology. Of these, 4 showed antimicrobial activity against Gram positive, Gram
Negative and clinical and non-clinical isolates.
• The FTIR results demonstrated that antimicrobial metabolites produced by the selected
bacterial strain resembled Bacitracin.
• Optimum conditions recorded for antibiotic production were 35oC, pH 5, incubation time of 48 hrs
and Nutrient broth as growth and production medium.
• The study isolates (Serratia sp. KC1-MRL, Bacillus licheniformis KC2-MRL, Bacillus sp. KC3-
MRL and Stenotrophomonas sp. KC4-MRL) showed ability to degrade polyethylene plastic.
• The isolates were also able to produce valuable commercial enzymes including; Proteases, Lipases,
Amylases
• The geochemical analysis revealed that the samples were rich in different elements and compounds
with the most abundant element detected was Ca followed by Fe.
• The microbes were able to mineralize different polymeric forms of Ca, these forms are calcite,
vetarite and argonite.
• Reports for mineralization of vetarite are very limited; our isolates are very efficient in vetarite
mineralization.
• Study isolates were also potent Mn oxidizers. Enhance oxidation of Mn was recorded in the
presence of Ca.
Future Prospects
1. Application of cavernicolic compounds in different industrial fields
2. There are more than 50 caves in Pakistan, they need to be explored microbiologically,
geochemically and geomicrobiologically.
3. Need deep metagenomic studies for the detection of more potent cavervicoles.
4. Search for novel isolates which have potential role in biogeochemical processes in
biomineralization.
5. Simulation studies for extraterrestrial life signatures
References
Adams LF, Ghiorse WC. 1987. Characterization of extracellular Mn2+ -oxidizing activity
and isolation of an Mn2+ oxidizing protein from Leptothrix discophora SS-1. J Bacteriol
169:1279– 1285.
Adams LF, Ghiorse WC. 1988. Oxidation state of Mn in the Mn-oxide produced by
Leptothrix discophora SS-1. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52:2073–76
Adams, D. J., U. Ogden, P. Pennington, S. Tachie-Menson, N. Socorro and L. A. F.
Gutierrez (2005). The role of microorganisms in acid rock drainage. SME Annual Meeting
February.
Alexandre G, Zhulin IB. 2000. Laccases are widespread in bacteria. Trends Biotechn.
18:41–42
Back M.E. & Mandarino J.A., 2008 – Fleischer’s glossary of mineral species. Tucson: The
Mineralogical Record: 344 p.
Badino G., Bernabei T., De Vivo A., Giulivo I. & Sa- vino G., 2004 – The mysterious
waters of Quatro Cienegas, Tintoretto, Treviso, 288 p.
Banat, I. M., A. Franzetti, I. Gandolfi, G. Bestetti, M. G. Martinotti, L. Fracchia, T. J.
Smyth and R. Marchant (2010). "Microbial biosurfactants production, applications and
future potential." Applied microbiology and biotechnology 87(2): 427-444.
Barath, V.S., Faber, F.J., Westland, S., Niedermeier, W., 2003. Spectrophotometric
analysis of all-ceramic materials and their interaction with luting agents and different
backgrounds. Adv. Dental Res., 17, 55–60.
Barber J. 1984. Has the mangano-protein of the water splitting reaction of photosynthesis
been
Barth, N. 2013. "Caversham Caves, New Zealand: Breaking the Sea Cave Paradigm". NSS
(National Speleological Society) News 71(10): 4–14.
Barth, N. 2013. "Caversham Caves, New Zealand: Breaking the Sea Cave Paradigm". NSS
(National Speleological Society) News 71(10): 4–14.
Barton H.A., 2006 – Introduction to cave microbiology: a review for the non-specialist.
Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, 68(2): 43–54.
Barton H.A., Taylor M.R. and Pace N.R., 2004 Molecular phylogenetic analysis of a
bacterial community in an oligotrophic cave environment. Geomicrobiology Journal, 21:
11-20.
Barton HA and Jurado V (2007) What's up down there? Microbial diversity in caves.
Barton HA and Northup DE (2007) Geomicrobiology in cave environments: past, current
and future perspectives. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 69: 163-178.
Barton HA, Taylor NM, Kreate MP, Springer AC, Oehrle SA and Bertog JL (2007) The
impact of host rock geochemistry on bacterial community structure in oligotrophic cave
environments. International Journal of Speleology 36: 5.
Barton, H. A. and V. Jurado (2007). "What's up down there? Microbial diversity in caves."
Barton, H.A. and Northup, D.E., 2006, Geomicrobiology in cave environments: Past,
current and future perspectives: Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, submitted.
Baskar S, Baskar R, Thorseth IH, Øvreås L and Pedersen RB (2012) Microbially induced
iron precipitation associated with a neutrophilic spring at Borra Caves, Vishakhapatnam,
India. Astrobiology 12: 327-346.
Bäuerlein, E. (2003). Biomineralization of unicellular organisms: an unusual membrane
biochemistry for the production of inorganic nano- and microstructures. Angew. Chem.
Int. 42, 614–641.
Bennett, A., and Barton, H.A., 2006, Description of Polaromonas subterraneae sp. nov., a
new representative of the genus Polaromonas identified within oligotrophic cave and Karst
environments: International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, v., in
preparation.
Bernasconi R., 1962 Nota sul giacimento di epsomite di Tanai Val Serrata (Ticino).
Rassegna Speleologica Italiana, 14(4): 362-370.
Bertolani M., 1958 – Particolare ambiente minerogenetico in una grotta delle argille
scagliose. Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Speleology, Bari, 1: 220-225.
Beyer WF, Fridovich I. 1986. Manganese-catalase and manganese superoxide dismutase:
spectroscopic similarity with functional diversity. In: VL Schramm, FC Wedler, editors.
Manganese in metabolism and enzyme function. Orlando: Academic Press, p 193–219.
Beyer, W., I. Fridovich, V. Schramm and F. Wedler (1986). "Manganese in metabolism
and enzyme function." Chapter 12: 193.
Biswas J (2010) Kotumsar Cave biodiversity: a review of cavernicoles and their
troglobiotic traits. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 275-289.
Biswas J (2010) Kotumsar Cave biodiversity: a review of cavernicoles and their
troglobiotic traits. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 275-289.
Bob Gulden. January 10, 2016. "Worlds longest caves". Geo2 Committee on Long and
Deep Caves. National Speleological Society (NSS). RetrievedJanuary 10, 2016
Boogerd FC, de Vrind JPM. 1987. Manganese oxidation by Leptothrix discophora. J
Bacteriol 169:489–494.
Boston P.J., Spilde M.N., Northup D.E., Melim L.A., Soroka D.S., Kleina L.G., Lavoie
K.H., Hose L.D., Mallory L.M., Dahm C.N., Crossey L.J. & Schelble R.T., 2001 – Cave
biosignature suites: microbes, minerals and Mars. Astrobiology Journal, 1(1): 25-55.
Boston, P. J., Hose, L. D., Northup, D. E., & Spilde, M. N. (2006). The microbial
communities of sulfur caves: a newly appreciated geologically driven system on Earth and
potential model for Mars. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 404, 331-344.
Boston, P.J., Spilde, M.N., Northup, D.E., Melim, L.A., Soroka, D.S., Kleina, L.G., Lavoie,
K.H., Hose, L.D., Mallory, L.M., Dahm, C.N., Crossey, L.J., and Schelble, R.T., 2001,
Cave Biosignature Suite: Microbes, Minerals and Mars: Astrobiology, v. 1, p. 25–55.
Bridge P.J. & Robinson B.W., 1983 – Niahite – a new mineral from Malaysia.
Mineralogical Magazine, 47: 79-80.
Broughton P.L., 1972 – Secondary mineralization in the cavern environment. Studies in
Speleology, 2(5): 191-207.
Buczynski C and Chafetz HS (1991) Habit of bacterially induced precipitates of calcium
carbonate and the influence of medium vicosity on mineralogy. Journal of Sedimentary
Research 61.
Burcham, J., 2009. Learning about caves; how caves are formed. Journey into amazing
caves. Project Underground.
Cacchio P, Contento R, Ercole C, Cappuccio G, Martinez MP and Lepidi A (2004)
Involvement of microorganisms in the formation of carbonate speleothems in the Cervo
Cave (L'Aquila-Italy). Geomicrobiology Journal 21: 497-509.
Cai X and Lytton J (2004) The cation/Ca2+ exchanger superfamily: phylogenetic analysis
and structural implications. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1692-1703.
Calaforra J.M., Forti P. & Fernandez-Cortes A., 2008 – The speleothems in gypsum caves
and their paleoclimatological significance. Environmental Geology, 53(5): 1099-1105.
Canaveras J.C., Cueza S., Sanchez-Moral S., Lario J., Laiz L., Gonzalez J.M and Saiz-
Jimmenez C., 2006 On the origin of fiber calcite crystals in moonmilk deposits.
Naturwissenschaften, 93: 27-32.
Canaveras, J.C., Cuezva, S., Sanchez-Moral, S., Lario, J., Laiz, L., Gonzalez, J.M., and
Saiz-Jimenez, C., 2006, On the origin of fiber calcite crystals in moonmilk deposits:
Naturwissenschaften, v. 93, p. 27–32.
Castanier S, Le Métayer-Levrel G and Perthuisot J-P (1999) Ca-carbonates precipitation
and limestone genesis—the microbiogeologist point of view. Sedimentary Geology 126:
9-23.
Castanier, S., Le Metayer-Levrel, G., and Perthuisot, J. P. (2000). “Bacterial roles in the
precipitation of carbonate minerals,” in Microbial Sediments, eds R. E. Riding and S. M.
Awramik (Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag), 32–39.
Castanier, S., Le Metayer-Levrel, G., Perthuisot, J.P., 1999. Ca-carbonates precipitation
and limestone genesis – the microbiogeologist point of view. Sed. Geol., 126, 9–23.
Chang, C. and M. Hung (2012). "The role of EZH2 in tumour progression." British journal
of cancer 106(2): 243-247.
Chen Y, Wu L, Boden R, et al. (2009) Life without light: microbial diversity and evidence
of sulfur-and ammonium-based chemolithotrophy in Movile Cave. ISME J 3: 1093-1104.
Chiesi M. & Forti P., 1995 – A proposito di un particolare tipo di calcite ottante osservata
nella grotto di Grave Grubbo (Verzino, Calabria). Atti e Memorie della Commissione
Grotte “E. Boegan”, 32: 43-53.
Claus H. 2003. Laccases and their occurence in prokaryotes. Arch. Microbiol. 179:145–49
Cooper, A.H, Farrant, A.R., Palmer, A.H., 2007. Karst Activity. In Geoindicators, an
online site maintained by the International Union of Geoscientists.
Corstjens PLAM, de Vrind JPM, Goosen T, de Vrind-de Jong EW. 1997. Identification
and molecular analysis of the Leptothrix discophora SS-1 mofA gene, a gene putatively
encoding a manganese oxidizing protein with copper domains. Geomicrobiol J 14:91–
108.
Crane R & Fletcher L (2015) Cave: Nature and Culture. Reaktion Books.
Crane R and Fletcher L (2015) Cave: Nature and Culture. Reaktion Books.
Cuezva, S., Sanchez-Moral, S., Saiz-Jimenez, C., & Cañaveras, J. C. (2009). Microbial
communities and associated mineral fabrics in Altamira Cave, Spain. International Journal
of Speleology, 38(1), 9.
Cunningham, S. D., W. R. Berti and J. W. Huang (1995). "Phytoremediation of
contaminated soils." Trends in biotechnology 13(9): 393-397.
Curl RL. 1966. Caves as a measure of karst. J Geol 74:798– 830.
Danielli, H. and M. Edington (1983). "Bacterial calcification in limestone caves."
Geomicrobiology Journal 3(1): 1-16.
Davies G.J., 1998 – “Hades” - a remarkable cave on Oldoinyo Lengai in the East African
Rift Valley. International Journal of Speleology, 27B(1/4): 57–67.
Davies SHR, Morgan JJ. 1989. Manganese oxidation kinetics on metal oxide surfaces. J
Colloid
De Muynck, W., Debrouwer, D., De Belie, N., Verstraete, W., 2008. Bacterial carbonate
precipitation improves the durability of cementitious materials. Cem. Con. Res., 38, 1005–
1014.
de Vrind JPM, de Vrind-de Jong EW, de Voogt J-WH, Westbroek P, Boogert FC, Rosson
RA. 1986a. Manganese oxidation by spores and the spore coats of a marine Bacillus
species. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:1096–1100.
De Waele J., Forti P., Picotti V., Galli E., Rossi A., Bro- ok G., Zini L. & Cucchi F., 2009
– Cave deposits in Cordillera de la Sal (Atacama, Chile). In: Rossi P.L. (Ed.), Geological
Constrains on the Onset and Evolu- tion of an Extreme Environment: the Atacama area.
Geoacta, Special Publication 2: 113-117.
De Waele J., Forti P., Picotti V., Galli E., Rossi A., Brook G., Zini L. & Cucchi F., 2009
Cave deposits in Cordillera de la Sal (Atacama, Chile). In: Rossi P.L. (Ed.), Geological
Constrains on the Onset and Evolu- tion of an Extreme Environment: the Atacama area.
Geoacta, Special Publication 2: 113-117.
DeJong, J. T., Mortensen, M. B., Martinez, B. C., and Nelson, D. C. (2010). Biomediated
soil improvement. Ecol. Eng. 36, 197–210.
Diem D, Stumm W. 1984. Is dissolved Mn2+ being oxidized by O2 in absence of Mn-
bacteria or surface catalysts? Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:1571–1573.
Dismukes GC. 1986. The organisation and function of manganese in the water-oxidizing
complex of photosynthesis. In: VL Schramm, FC Wedler, editors. Manganese in
metabolism and enzyme function. Orlando: Academic Press, p 275–309.
Douglas, S., and Beveridge, T. J. (1998). Mineral formation by bacteria in natural microbial
communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 26, 79–88.
Douka CE. 1980. Kinetics of manganese oxidation by cell-free extracts of bacteria isolated
from
Dreybrodt W., 1988 – Processes in karst systems. Physics, chemistry and geology. Berlin:
Springer- Verlag: 288 p.
Dubinina GA. 1978. Mechanism of the oxidation of divalent iron and manganese by iron
bacteria growing at neutral pH of the medium. Microbiology 47:471–478.
Dubinina, G. (1977). "[Mechanism of the oxidation of divalent iron and manganese by iron
bacteria developing in a neutral acidic medium]." Mikrobiologiia 47(4): 591-599.
E. Northup, K. H. L., Diana (2001). "Geomicrobiology of caves: a review."
Geomicrobiology journal 18(3): 199-222.
Ehrlich HL (1996) How microbes influence mineral growth and dissolution. Chemical
geology 132: 5-9.
Ehrlich HL. 1968. Bacteriology of manganese nodules. II. Manganese oxidation by cell-
free extracts from a manganese nodule bacterium. Appl Microbiol 16:197–202.
Ehrlich HL. 1983. Manganese-oxidizing bacteria from a hydrothermally active area on the
Galapagos Rift. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 35:357–366.
Ehrlich HL. 1984. Different forms of bacterial manganese oxidation. In: WR Strohl, H
Tuovinen, editors. Microbial chemoautrophy. Ohio State Univ Colloq 8. Columbus, OH:
Ohio State University Press, p 47–56.
Ehrlich, H. L. (1996). How microbes influence mineral growth and dis- solution. Chem.
Geol.132, 5–9.
Ehrlich, H. L., W. J. Ingledew and J. C. Salerno (1991). "Iron-and manganese-oxidizing
bacteria." Variations in autotrophic life. Academic: 147-170.
Engel AS, Stern LA and Bennett PC (2004) Microbial contributions to cave formation:
New insights into sulfuric acid speleogenesis. Geology 32: 369-372.
Engel, A. S. (2007). Observations on the biodiversity of sulfidic karst habitats. Journal of
Cave and Karst Studies, 69(1), 187-206.
Engel, A. S. (2015). Microbial Life of Cave Systems, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Engel, A.S., Stern, L.A., and Bennett, P.C., 2004, Microbial contributions to cave
formation: New insights into sulfuric acid speleogenesis: Geology, v. 32, p. 369–372.
Ercole, C., Cacchio, P., Botta, A.L., Centi, V. et al., 2007. Bacterially induced
mineralization of calcium carbonate: the role of exopolysaccharides and capsular
polysacchar- ides. Microsc. Microanal., 13, 42–50.
Evangelou, V.P. and Y.L. Zhang. (1995), “Pyrite Oxidation Mechanisms and Acid Mine
Drainage Prevention”, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Tech. 25(2):141- 199.
Farnham J.H., 1820 – Extract of a letter describing the Mammoth Cave in Kentucky.
Transactions of the American Antiquarian Society, I: 355-361.
Ferris, F. G., and Stehmeier, L. G. (1992). Bacteriogenic Mineral Plugging, United States
Patent 5143155.
Ford, Derek C.; Williams, P.W. (1989). Karst Geomorphology and Hydrology.
Ford, Derek C.; Williams, P.W. (1989). Karst Geomorphology and Hydrology.
Forti P (2001) Biogenic speleothems: an overview. International Journal of Speleology 30:
4.
Forti P. & Mocchiutti A., 2004 Le condizioni ambientali che permettono l’evoluzione di
speleotemi di zolfo in cavità ipogeniche: nuovi dati dalle grotte di Capo Palinuro (Salerno,
Italia). Grotte d’Italia, 4: 39-48.
Forti P. & Rabbi E., 1981 – The role of CO2 in gypsum speleogenesis: 1st contribution.
International Journal of Speleology, 11(3-4): 207-218.
Forti P., 1983 – I minerali di grotta. Speleo, 9: 9-24.
Forti P., 1987 – Studio mineralogico ed evolutivo dei nodule ferrosi della grotta Pod
Lanisce (Friuli). Mondo Sotterraneo, 11(1/2): 15-30.
Forti P., 1996a. Speleothems and cave minerals in gypsum caves. International Journal of
Speleology, 25(3–4): 91–104.
Forti P., 1996b Thermal karst systems. Acta Carsologica, 25: 99-117.
Forti P., 2001 – Biogenic speleothems: an overview. International Journal of Speleology,
30A(1/4): 39-56.
Forti P., 2005 – Genetic processes of cave minerals in volcanic environment: an overview.
Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, 67(1): 3-13.
Forti P., Galli E. & Rossi A., 2006 – Peculiar mineroge- netic cave environments of
Mexico: the Cuatro Ciéne- gas area. Acta Carsologica, 35(2): 79-98.
Forti P., Giudice G., Marino A. & Rossi A., 1994 – La Grotta Cutrona (MC1) sul Monte
Etna e i suoi speleo- temi metastabili. Atti Congresso Regionale di Spele- ologia, Catania,
1994, 125-151.
Fortin, D., Ferris, F. G., and Beveridge, T. J. (1997). Surface-mediated mineral
development by bacteria. Rev. Mineral. 35, 161–180.
Francis CA, Tebo BM. 2001. Diversity of cumA multicopper oxidase genes from Mn(II)-
oxidizing and non-oxidizing Pseudomonas strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:4272– 78
Francis G. Howarth. 1973. The Cavernicolous Fauna of Hawaiian Lava Tubes. Pacific
Insects 15(1): 139-151.
Francis G. Howarth. 1973. The Cavernicolous Fauna of Hawaiian Lava Tubes. Pacific
Insects 15(1): 139-151.
Fujita, Y., Ferris, F. G., Lawson, R. D., Colwell, F. S., and Smith, R. W. (2000). Calcium
carbonate precipi- tation by ureolytic subsurface bac- teria. Geomicrobiol. J. 17, 305–318.
Gadd, G. M. (2010). "Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and
bioremediation." Microbiology 156(3): 609-643.
Galdenzi S. & Menichetti M., 1995 Occurence of hypogenic caves in karst region:
examples from central Italy. Environmental Geology, 26: 39-47.
Garavelli C.L. & Quagliarella A.F., 1974 – Mellite di Grotta Romanelli. Periodico di
Mineralogia, Roma, 43(1): 39-49.
Gascoine, W. (1982). "The formation of black deposits in some caves of south east Wales."
Cave Science 9(3): 167-175.
Gázquez, F., J. M. Calaforra and P. Forti (2011). "Black Mn-Fe crusts as markers of abrupt
palaeoenvironmental changes in El Soplao Cave (Cantabria, Spain)." International Journal
of Speleology 40(2): 9.
Ghiorse WC. 1984. Biology of iron- and manganese-depositing bacteria. Annu Rev
Microbiol 38:515– 550.
Gillieson D. 1996. Caves: processes, development, and management. Oxford: Blackwell
Publishers Ltd., 324 p.
Greeley, R. 1971. Lunar Hadley Rille: Considerations of its origin. Science 172: 722-725.
1971b. Geology of selected lava tubes in the Bend area, Oregon. State of Oregon, Dept, of
Geology and Mineral Industries Bull. 71: 1-47.
Greeley, R. 1971a. Lunar Hadley Rille: Considerations of its origin. Science 172: 722-725.
Hamad, B. (2010). The antibiotics market. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 9(9), 675-676.
Hammes F and Verstraete W (2002) Key roles of pH and calcium metabolism in microbial
carbonate precipitation. Reviews in environmental science and biotechnology 1: 3-7.
Harrison, A.P. Jr. (1984), “The Acidophilic Thiobacilli and Other Acidophilic Bacteria that
Share their Habitat”. Ann. Rev. Microbiol, 38:265-292.
Hayden, B., and Villeneuve, S. (2011). Astronomy in the Upper Palaeolithic?.Cambridge
Archaeological Journal, 21(03), 331-355.
Hem JD, Lind CJ. 1983. Nonequilibrium models for predicting forms of precipitated
manganese oxides. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 47:2037–2046.
Hill C.A. & Eller P.G., 1977 – Soda-niter in earth cracks of Wupatky National Monument.
National Speleological Society Bulletin, 39(4): 113-116.
Hill C.A. & Forti P., 1997 – Cave minerals of the world (2nd ed.). Huntsville: National
Speleological Society: 464 p.
Hill C.A., 1981a – Mineralogy of cave nitrates. National Speleological Society Bulletin,
43(4): 127-132.
Hill C.A., 1981b – Origin of cave saltpeter. National Speleological Society Bulletin, 43(4):
110-126.
Hill C.A., 1987 – Geology of Carlsbad Caverns and other caves in the Guadalupe
Mountains. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Memoires, 117, 150 p.
Hill C.A., 1995 – Sulfur redox reactions: hydrocarbons, native sulfur, Mississippi Valley-
type deposits, and sulfuric acid karst in the Delaware Basin, New Mexico and Texas.
Environmental Geology, 25: 16-23.
Hill CA (1990) Sulfuric Acid Speleogenesis of Carlsbad Cavern and Its Relationship to
Hydrocarbons, Delaware Basin, New Mexico and Texas (1). AAPG Bulletin 74: 1685-
1694.
Hill CA, Forti P. 1997. Cave minerals of the world, 2nd ed. Huntsville, AL: National
Speleological Society. 463 p.
Hill, C. (1982). "Origin of black deposits in caves." National Speleological Society Bulletin
44(1): 15-19.
Hill, C. A. and P. Forti (1997). Cave minerals of the world, National speleological society.
Hofer C, Schlosser D. 1999. Novel enzymatic oxidation of Mn2+ to Mn3+ catalyzed by a
fungal laccase. FEBS Lett 451:186–190.
Holmes, A. J., Tujula, N. A., Holley, M., Contos, A., James, J. M., Rogers, P., & Gillings,
M. R. (2001). Phylogenetic structure of unusual aquatic microbial formations in Nullarbor
caves, Australia. Environmental microbiology, 3(4), 256-264.
Huang Yunlin, L. J., Zhang Yaoguang (1986). "The types and characteristics of the caves
in east china." geographical research 5(4): 86-92.
Hugenholtz P, Goebel BM, Pace NR (1998) Impact of culture-independent studies on the
emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. Journal of Bacteriology 180: 4765-
4774.
Hullo MF, Moszer I, Danchin A, Martin- Verstraete I. 2001. CotA of Bacillus subtilis is a
copper dependent laccase. J. Bacteriol. 183:5426–30
Huston WM, Jennings MP, McEwan AG. 2002. The multicopper oxidase of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa is a ferroxidase with a central role in iron acquisition. Mol. Microbiol. 45:1741–
50
Ikner, L. A., Toomey, R. S., Nolan, G., Neilson, J. W., Pryor, B. M., & Maier, R. M. (2007).
Culturable microbial diversity and the impact of tourism in Kartchner Caverns, Arizona.
Microbial ecology, 53(1), 30-42.
Interface Sci 129:63–77.
isolated? Trends Biochem Sci 9:99–100.
Jagnow D.H., Hill C.A., Davis D.G., DuChene H.R., Cunningham K.I., Northup D.E. &
Queen M.J., 2000 History of the sulfuric acid theory of speleogenesis in the Guadalupe
Mountains, New Mexico.
Jakobsson S.B., Jónsson S.S. & Leonardsen E., 1992 – Encrustations from lava caves in
Surtsey, Iceland. A preliminary report. Surtsey Research Project Re- port, 10: 73-78.
John Burcham. "Learning about caves; how caves are formed". Journey into amazing
caves. Project Underground. Retrieved September 8, 2009.
Johnson, D. B., Ghauri, M. A., & McGinness, S. (1993). Biogeochemical cycling of iron
and sulphur in leaching environments. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 11(1-3), 63-70.
Jones B., 2010 – Microbes in caves: agents of calcite corrosion and precipitation. In: Pedley
H.M. & Rogerson M. (Eds.), Tufas and speleothems: unraveling the microbial and physical
controls. London: Geo- logical Society, Special Publications, 336(1): 7-30.
Jones, A. A. and P. C. Bennett (2014). "Mineral microniches control the diversity of
subsurface microbial populations." Geomicrobiology journal 31(3): 246-261.
Jones, B. (1992). "Manganese precipitates in the karst terrain of Grand Cayman, British
West Indies." Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 29(6): 1125-1139.
Jónsson S.S., 1994 – Mineral encrustation in Icelandic lava caves. Acta I° Incontro
Internacional de Vulcanoespeleologia das Ilhas Atlanticas, Pico, Acores, 1992, 89-91.
Jung WK, Schweisfurth R. 1979. Manganese oxidation by an intracellular protein of a
Pseudomonas species. Z Allg Microbiol 19:107–115.
Junta J.L, Hochella M.F Jr. 1994. Manganese(II) oxidation at mineral surfaces: a
microscopic and spectroscopic study. Geochim. Co mochim. Acta 58:4985–99
Kasama T and Murakami T (2001) The effect of microorganisms on Fe precipitation rates
at neutral pH. Chemical Geology 180: 117-128.
Kashima N. & Suh M.S., 1984 – Hjeobaje cave system, a pseudocalcareous cave in Jeju
Island, South Korea: Journal of Speleological Society of Japan, 9: 23-30.
Kashima N., Ogawa T. & Hong S.H., 1989 – Volca genic speleominerals in Cheju Island,
Korea. Journal of Speleological Society of Japan, 14: 32-39.
Kim C, Lorenz WW, Hoopes JT, Dean JFD. 2001. Oxidation of phenolate siderophores by
the multicopper oxidase encoded by the Escherichia coli yakK gene. J. Bacteriol.
183:4866–75
Kirchner, W. and S. Grabowski (1972). MANGANESE IN LACUSTRINE
ECOSYSTEMS: A REVIEW1, Wiley Online Library.
Klassek G, 1989. Study of caves in Beskidy Mts. and Carpathian Foothills in Poland. In:
2. Sympozium o Pseudokrasu. Sborník referatů ze sympozia. Janovičky u Broumova, 1985.
Czech Speleological Society, vol. 10. Praha, pp. 44-48.
Klassek G, 1989. Study of caves in Beskidy Mts. and Carpathian Foothills in Poland. In:
2. Sympozium o Pseudokrasu. Sborník referatů ze sympozia. Janovičky u Broumova, 1985.
Czech Speleological Society, vol. 10. Praha, pp. 44-48.
Klassek G, 1994. Pseudokarst caves in Polish Karpaty Mts. In: 5th Pseudokatrst
Sympozium with International Participation, Szczyrk 1994. Proceedings. Bielsko-Biała,
pp. 5-9.
Klassek G, 2004. Caves of the Polish Flysch Carpathians. In: L Gaál (Ed.), Proceedings of
the 8th Intern. Symp. on Pseudokarst. Teply Vrch, Slovakia, 2004. Slovak Cave
Administration, Liptovský Mikuláš, pp. 69-74.
Klassek G, Mikuszewski J, 1997. Przyrodnicza charakterystyka jaskiń, warunków ich
występowania i rozwoju w obszarze polskich Karpat fliszowych. In: M Pulina (Ed.),
Jaskinie polskich Karpat fliszowych, v. 1. Pol. Tow. Przyjaciół Nauk o Ziemi, Warszawa,
pp. 7-18
Klassek G, Mleczek T, 2008. Exploration of caves in the Polish Outer Carpathians in the
past and nowadays. Zacisk – special issue (9th Intern. Symp. on Pseudokarst). Bull. of the
Speleoclub Bielsko-Biała, Bielsko-Biała, 4-6.
riley Knorre, H., and Krumbein, K. E. (2000). “Bacterial calcification,” in Microbial
Sediments, eds E. E. Riding and S. M. Awramik (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 25–31.
Laiz, L., Pinar, G., Lubitz, W., and Saiz-Jimenez, C., 2003, Monitoring the colonization of
monuments by bacteria: Cultivation versus molecular methods: Environmental
Microbiology, v. 5, p. 72–74.
Larocca F. (Ed.), 2005 – La miniera pre-protostorica di Grotta della Monaca (Sant’Agata
di Esaro, Cosenza). Centro Regionale di Speleologia “Enzo dei Medici“, 98 p.
Le Metayer-Levrel, G., Castanier, S., Orial, G., Loubiere, J.F. et al., 1999. Applications of
bacterial carbonatogenesis to the protection and regeneration of limestones in buildings
and historic patrimony. Sed. Geol., 126, 25–34.
Lee Y, Hendson M, Panopoulos N, Schroth M. 1994. Molecular cloning, chromosomal
map- ping, and sequence analysis of copper resis- tance genes from Xanthomonas
campestris pv. juglandis: homology with small blue cop- per proteins and multicopper
oxidase. J. Bac- teriol. 176:173–88
Lovley DR, Phillips EJ (1987) Rapid assay for microbially reducible ferric iron in aquatic
sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53: 1536-1540
Lovley DR. 1991. Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction. Microbiol Rev 55:259–
287.
Lutz Ehrlich, H. and D. K. Newman (2008). Geomicrobiology of iron. Geomicrobiology,
Fifth Edition, CRC press: 279-345.
Macalady JL, Jones DS and Lyon EH (2007) Extremely acidic, pendulous cave wall
biofilms from the Frasassi cave system, Italy. Environmental microbiology 9: 1402-1414.
manganese concretions from soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 39:74–80.
Marshall MJ and 18 coauthors (2006) The role of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 outer
membrane c-type cytochromes in extra- cellular U(VI)O2 nanoparticle forma- tion. Public
Library of Science Biology 4: 1324-1333
Martini J., 1978 – Sasaite, a new phosphate mineral from West Driefontein Cave,
Transvaal, South Africa. Mineralogical Magazine, 42: 401-404
Martini J.E., 1992 – Swaknoite [Ca(NH4)2(HPO4)2·H2O, orthorhombic]: a new mineral
from Arnhem Cave, Namibia. South African Speleological Association Bulletin, 32: 72-
74.
Martini J.E.J., 1980a – Mbobomkulite, hydrombobom- kulite and nikelalumite, new
minerals from Mbobo Mkulu cave, eastern Transvaal. Ann. Geol. Surv. South Africa,
14(2): 1-10.
Martini J.E.J., 1980b – Sveite, a new mineral from Au tana Cave, Territorio Federal
Amazonas, Venezuela. Transactions of the Geological Society of South Af- rica, 83: 239–
241.
Martini J.E.J., 1983 – Lonecreekite, sabieite and clair- ite, new secondary ammonium
ferric-ion sulphates from Lone Creek Fall cave, near Sabie, eastern Transvaal. Annals of
the Geological Survey South Africa, 17: 29-34.
Mastromei G, Biagiotti L, Daly S, Perito B and Tiano P (1999) Stone reinforcement by
biomediated calcite crystal precipitation. 253-256.
Mc Connaughey, T. A., and Whelan, J. F. (1997). Calcification generates protons for
nutrient and bicarbonate uptake. Earth Sci. Rev. 42, 95–117.
McConnaughey, T.A., Whelan, J.F., 1997. Calcification generates protons for nutrient and
bicarbonate uptake. Earth Sci. Rev., 42, 95–117.
Mellano MA, Cooksey DA. 1988. Nucleotide sequence and organization of copper
resistance genes from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. J. Bacteriol. 170:2879–83
Mobley, H. L. T., and Hausinger, R. P. (1989). Microbial urease: Significance, regulation
and molecular characterization. Microbiol. Rev. 53, 85–108.
Moore G (1981) Manganese deposition in limestone caves. 2, 642-645.
Moore GW and Nicholas BG (1967) Speleology: the study of caves.
Moore, G. (1981). Manganese deposition in limestone caves. Proceedings of the 8th
International Congress of Speleology.
Morgan JJ, Stumm W. 1964. Colloid-chemical properties of manganese dioxide. J Colloid
Sci 19:347– 359.
Morita RY (1980) Calcite precipitation by marine bacteria∗. Geomicrobiology Journal 2:
63-82.
Murray JW, Dillard JG, Giovanoli R, Moers H, Stumm W. 1985. Oxidation of Mn(II):
initial mineralogy, oxidation state and aging. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 49:463–470.
Mylroie, J.E. & Mylroie, J.R. 2013. "Pseudokarst Caves in the Littoral Environment". In
Lace, M.J. and Mylroie, J.E.. Coastal Karst Landforms. New York.
Mylroie, J.E. and Mylroie, J.R. 2013. "Pseudokarst Caves in the Littoral Environment". In
Lace, M.J. and Mylroie, J.E.. Coastal Karst Landforms. New York.
Nealson KH (2010) Geomicrobiology: Sediment reactions defy dogma. Nature 463: 1033-
1034
Nealson KH, Little B. 1997. Breathing manganese and iron: solid-state respiration. Adv
Appl Microbiol 45:213–239.
Nealson KH, Myers CR. 1992. Microbial reduction of manganese and iron: new
approaches to carbon cycling. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:439–443.
Nealson KH, Tebo BM, Rosson RA. 1988. Occurrence and mechanisms of microbial
oxidation of manganese. Adv Appl Microbiol 33:299–318.
Nealson, K. H. (1983). Microbial oxidation and reduction of manganese and iron.
Biomineralization and biological metal accumulation, Springer: 459-479.
Nealson, K. H., B. M. Tebo and R. A. Rosson (1988). "Occurrence and mechanisms of
microbial oxidation of manganese." Advances in Applied Microbiology 33: 279-318.
Nemati, M., Voordouw, G., 2003. Modification of porous media permeability, using
calcium carbonate produced enzymatically in situ. Enzy. Microb. Technol., 33, 635– 642.
Nicolaus, B., M. Kambourova and E. T. Oner (2010). "Exopolysaccharides from
extremophiles: from fundamentals to biotechnology." Environmental Technology 31(10):
1145-1158.
Nordstrom DK, Southam G (1997) Geomicrobiology of sulfide mineral oxidation. Reviews
in Mineralogy 35: 361-390
Nordstrom, D. K. and C. Alpers (1999). "Geochemistry of acid mine waters." Reviews in
economic geology 6: 133-160.
Northup D.E. & Lavoie K.H., 2001 – Geomicrobiology of caves: A review.
Geomicrobiology Journal, 18: 199–222.
Northup D.E. & Lavoie K.H., 2004 – Microbiology in caves. In: Gunn J. (Ed.),
Encyclopedia of caves and karst science. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers: 506-
509.
Northup D.E., Reysenbach A.L. & Pace N.R., 1997 – Microorganisms and speleothems.
In: Hill C.A. & Forti P. (Eds.), Cave minerals of the world. Hunts- ville: National
Speleological Society: 261-266.
Northup, D. E., S. M. Barns, L. E. Yu, M. N. Spilde, R. T. Schelble, K. E. Dano, L. J.
Crossey, C. A. Connolly, P. J. Boston and D. O. Natvig (2003). "Diverse microbial
communities inhabiting ferromanganese deposits in Lechuguilla and Spider Caves."
Environmental Microbiology 5(11): 1071-1086.
Northup, D., A. Reysenbach and N. Pace (1997). "Microorganisms and speleothems." Cave
minerals of the world: 261-266.
Oilier, C. D. and M. C. Brown. 1965. Lava caves of Victoria. Bull. Volcanologique 25:
215-229.
Okazaki M, Sugita T, Shimizu M, Ohode Y, Iwamoto K, de Vrind-de Jong EW, de Vrind
JPM, Corstjens PLAM. 1997. Partial purification and characterization of manganese
oxidizing factors of Pseudomonas uorescens GB-1. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4793–
4799.
Ollier, C. and M. Brown (1965). "Lava caves of Victoria." Bulletin of Volcanology 28(1):
215-229.
Onac B.P. and Forti P. 2011. Minerogenetic mechanisms occurring in the cave
environment: an overview. International Journal of Speleology, 40 (2), 79-98.
Onac B.P., 1996 – Mineralogy of speleothems from caves in the Padurea Craiului
Mountains (Romania), and their palaeoclimatic significance. Cave and Karst Science,
23(3): 109-124.
Onac B.P., 2000 – The geology of karst terrains. Bucuresti: Ed. Didactica & Pedagogica:
400 p. (in Romanian with extended English summaries).
Onac B.P., 2005 – Minerals. In: Culver D.C. & White W.B. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of caves.
New York: Academic Press: 371-378.
Onac B.P., 2011a – State of the art and challenges in cave minerals studies. Studia UBB
Geologia, 56(1): in press.
Onac B.P., Effenberger H.S. & Breban R.C., 2007 High-temperature and “exotic” minerals
from the Cio- clovina Cave, Romania: a review. Studia UBB Geologia, 52(2): 3-10.
Onac B.P., Sumrall J.B., Tamas T., Povara I., Kearns J., Dârmiceanu V., Veres D. & Lascu
C., 2009 The relationship between cave minerals and H2S-rich thermal waters along the
Cerna Valley (SW Romania). Acta Carsologica, 38: 67-79.
Onac B.P., Veni G. & White W.B., 2001 – Depositional environment for metatyuyamunite
and related minerals from Caverns of Sonora. European Journal of Mineralogy, 24(1): 135-
143.
Onac B.P., Wynn J.G. & Sumrall J.B., 2011b – Trac- ing the sources of cave sulfates: a
unique case from Cerna Valley, Romania. Chemical Geology, in review.
Onac, B. P., M. Tysseland, M. Bengeanu and A. Hofenpradli (1997b). "Deposition of black
manganese and iron-rich sediments in Vântului Cave (Romania)." Proc. of the 12th Inter.
Congr. Speleol., La Chaux-de-Fonds 1: 235.
Onac, B. P., R. B. Pedersen and M. Tysseland (1997a). "Presence of rare-earth elements in
black ferromanganese coatings from Vântului Cave (Romania)." Journal of Caves and
Karst Studies 59: 128-131.
Onaga, L., 2001, Cashing in on nature’s pharmacy: EMBO Reports, v. 2, p. 263–265.
Ortiz M, Neilson J, Nelson W, et al. (2013) Profiling Bacterial Diversity and Taxonomic
Composition on Speleothem Surfaces in Kartchner Caverns, AZ. Microbial Ecology 65:
371-383.
Palmer A.N., 2007 – Cave geology. Dayton: Cave Books: 454 p.
Palmer AN (1991) Origin and morphology of limestone caves. Geological Society of
America Bulletin 103: 1-21.
Palmer AN. 1991. Origin and morphology of limestone caves. Geol Soc Am Bull 103:1–
21.
Pasic. L, Kovce. B, Sket. B, Velikonja. B. H. (2010). Diversity of microbial communities
colonizing the walls of a Karstic cave in Slovenia. FEMS Microbial Ecol 71: 50-60.
Peck S (1986) Bacterial deposition of iron and manganese oxides in North American caves.
National Speleological Society Bulletin 48: 26-30.
Pentecost, A., and Bauld, J. (1988). Nucleation of calcite on the sheaths of cyanobacteria
using a simple diffusion cell. Geomicrobiol. J. 6, 129–135.
Plummer L, Parkhurst D and Wigley T (1979) Critical review of the kinetics of calcite
dissolution and precipitation.
Pohl E.R. & White W.B., 1965 – Sulfate minerals: their origin in the Central Kentucky
karst. American Mineralogist, 50: 1462-1465.
Polyak V.J. & Provencio P., 2001 – By-product materials related to H2S – H2SO4
influenced speleogenesis of Carlsbad, Lechuguilla, and other caves of the Guadalupe
Mountains, New Mexico. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, 63: 23–32.
Post, J. E. (1999). "Manganese oxide minerals: Crystal structures and economic and
environmental significance." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96(7):
3447-3454.
Priesnitz K (1974) Losungsraten und ihre geomorphologische Relevanz. Abh. Akad. Wiss.
Göttingen, Math. Phys. Kl 3: 68-84.
Puchejda W, 1989. Genesis of the cave in Trzy Kopce in the Silesian Beskidy Mts. Kras i
Speleologia 6(XV): 66-78
Ramachandran, S.K., Ramakrishnan, V., Bang, S.S., 2001. Remediation of concrete using
microorganisms. ACI Mater. J., 98, 3–9.
Rivadeneyra M, Delgado R, Delgado G, Moral AD, Ferrer M and Ramos‐ Cormenzana A
(1993) Precipitation of carbonates by Bacillus sp. isolated from saline soils.
Geomicrobiology Journal 11: 175-184.
Rivadeneyra, M. A. G., Delgado, A., Ramos-Cormenzana., and Delgado, R. (1998).
Biomineralization of carbonates by Halomonas eurihalina in solid and liquid media with
different salinities: crystal formation sequence. Res. Microbiol. 149, 277–287.
Rivadeneyra, M. A., Delgado, R., Quesada, E., and Ramos- Cormenzana, A. (1991).
Precipitation of calcium car- bonate by Deleya halophila in media containing NaCl as sole
salt. Cur. Microbiol. 22, 185–190.
Rivadeneyra, M. A., Ramos- Cormenzana, A., Delgado, G., and Delgado, R. (1996).
Process of carbonate precip- itation by Deleya halophila. Cur. Microbiol.32, 308–313.
Rodriguez-Navarro, C., Rodriguez- Gallego, M., Chekroun, K. B., and Gonzalez-Muñoz,
M. T. (2003). Conservation of ornamental stone byMyxococcus xanthus induced carbonate
biomineralisation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 2182–2193.
Rodriguez-Navarro, C., Rodriguez-Gallego, M., Ben Chek- roun, K., González-Munoz,
M.T., 2003. Conservation of ornamental stone by Myxococcus xanthus-induced carbonate
biomineralization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 69, 2182– 2193.
Rothschild LJ and Mancinelli RL (2001) Life in extreme environments. Nature 409: 1092-
1101.
Sanchez-Moral S, Portillo M, Janices I, Cuezva S, Fernández-Cortés A, Cañaveras J and
Gonzalez J (2012) The role of microorganisms in the formation of calcitic moonmilk
deposits and speleothems in Altamira Cave. Geomorphology 139: 285-292.
Sarbu SM, Kane TC and Kinkle BK (1996) A chemoautotrophically based cave ecosystem.
Science 272: 1953.
Sasowsky I.D. & Palmer M.V., 1994 – Breakthroughs in karst geomicrobiology and redox
geochemistry. Karst Waters Institute Special Publications, 1: 112 p.
Schabereiter-Gurtner, C., Saiz-Jimenez, C., Pinar, G., Lubitz, W., and Rolleke, S., 2002,
Cave paleolithic paintings harbour complex and partly unknown microbial communities:
FEMS Microbiology Letters, v. 211, p. 7–11.
Schabereiter-Gurtner, C., Saiz-Jimenez, C., Piñar, G., Lubitz, W., & Rölleke, S. (2002).
Altamira cave Paleolithic paintings harbor partly unknown bacterial communities. FEMS
Microbiology Letters, 211(1), 7-11.
Schabereiter-Gurtner, C., Saiz-Jimenez, C., Piñar, G., Lubitz, W., & Rölleke, S. (2004).
Phylogenetic diversity of bacteria associated with Paleolithic paintings and surrounding
rock walls in two Spanish caves (Llonin and La Garma). FEMS Microbiology Ecology,
47(2), 235-247.
Schlosser D, Ho fer C. 2002. Laccase-catalyzed oxidation of Mn2+ in the presence of
natural Mn3+ chelators as a novel source of extra- cellular H2O2 production and its impact
on manganese peroxidase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:3514–21
Seemann R., 1970 – Neue Funde von Bohnerzen und Pyrit in der Dachstein-Mammuthöhle.
Höhlenkundl. Mitt. Landesverein Höhlenkunde in Wien and Niederösterreich, 26: 185-
189.
Shabarova T, Widmer F and Pernthaler J (2013) Mass effects meet species sorting:
transformations of microbial assemblages in epiphreatic subsurface karst water pools.
Environmental microbiology 15: 2476-2488.
Sharma A, Bhattacharya A, Pujari R and Shrivastava A (2008) Characterization of carbonic
anhydrase from diversified genus for biomimetic carbon-dioxide sequestration. Indian
journal of microbiology 48: 365-371.
Shaw T.D., 1997 – Historical introduction. In: Hill C.A. & Forti P. (Eds.), Cave minerals
of the world. Huntsville: National Speleological Society, 27-43.
Silver S, Phung LT (2005) A bacterial view of the periodic table: genes and proteins for
toxic inorganic ions. Journal of Industrial Microbiology Biotechnology 32: 587-605.
Singer, P.C., Stumm, W. (1970), “Acid Mine Drainage: The Rate Determining Step”,
Science, 167: 1121-1123.
Singh, G., A. Bhalla and P. K. Ralhan (2011). "Extremophiles and extremozyrnes:
Importance in current biotechnology." Extreme Life, Biospeology and Astrobiology 3(1).
Singh, O. and P. Gabani (2011). "Extremophiles: radiation resistance microbial reserves
and therapeutic implications." Journal of applied microbiology 110(4): 851-861.
Sjoberg, Rabbe. 1988. "Coastal Caves Indicating Preglacial Morphology in Norway". Cave
Science, The Transactions of the British Cave Research Association 15 (3): 99–103.
Sjoberg, Rabbe. 1988. "Coastal Caves Indicating Preglacial Morphology in Norway". Cave
Science, The Transactions of the British Cave Research Association 15 (3): 99–103.
Solomon EI, Sundaram UM, Machonkin TE. 1996. Multicopper oxidases and oxygenases.
Chem. Rev. 96:2563–605.
Stocks-Fischer, S., Galinat, J. K., and Bang, S. S. (1999). Microbiological precipitation of
CaCO3 . Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 1563–1571.
Stocks-Fischer, S., Galinat, J.K., Bang, S.S., 1999. Microbio- logical precipitation of
CaCO3. Soil Biol. Biochem., 31, 1563–1571.
Sung W, Morgan JJ. 1981. Oxidative removal of Mn(II) from solution catalysed by the c -
FeOOH (lepidocrocite) surface. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 45:2377–2383.
Swanson, D. A., D.B. Jackson, W. A. Duffield and D. W. Peterson. 1971. Mauna Ulu
eruption, Kilauea Volcano. Geotimes, May: 12-16.
Swanson, D. A., D.B. Jackson, W. A. Duffield and D. W. Peterson. 1971. Mauna Ulu
eruption, Kilauea Volcano. Geotimes, May: 12-16.
Tankersley K.H., 1996 – Prehistoric salt mining in the Mammoth Cave System. In:
Carstens K. & Watson P.J. (Eds.), Of caves and shell mounds in west-cen- tral Kentucky.
Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press: 33-39.
Tebo BM, Ghiorse WC, van Waasbergen LG, Siering PL, Caspi R. 1997. Bacterially
mediated mineral formation: insights into manganese (II) oxidation from molecular genetic
and biochemical studies. Rev Mineral 35:225– 266.
Tebo BM. 1991. Manganese(II) oxidation in the suboxic zone of the Black Sea. Deep Sea
Res 38: S883–S905.
Tebo, B. M. (1991). "Manganese (II) oxidation in the suboxic zone of the Black Sea." Deep
Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers 38: S883-S905.
Tebo, B. M., Ghiorse, W. C., Van Waasbergen, L. G., Siering, P. L., & Caspi, R. (1997).
Bacterially mediated mineral formation; insights into manganese (II) oxidation from
molecular genetics and biochemical studies. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry,
35(1), 225-266.
Tebo, B. M., J. R. Bargar, B. G. Clement, G. J. Dick, K. J. Murray, D. Parker, R. Verity
and S. M. Webb (2004). "Biogenic manganese oxides: properties and mechanisms of
formation." Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 32: 287-328.
Tiano, P., Biagiotti, L., and Mastromei, G. (1999). Bacterial bio-mediated calcite
precipitation for monumen- tal stones conservation: methods of evaluation. J. Microbiol.
Methods 36, 139–145.
Toner BM, Santelli CM, Marcus MA, Wirth R, Chan CS, McCollom T, Bach W, Edwards
KJ (2009) Biogenic iron oxyhydroxide formation at mid-ocean ridge hydrothermal vents:
Juan de Fuca Ridge. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 73: 388-403
Tourneford J.P., 1704 – Description du lab rinthe du Candie, avec quelques observations
sur l’accroissement et sur la génération des pierres. Paris: Memoires de l’Academie Royale
des Sciences: 406-424.
Waga JM, 1993. Genesis of the Komoniecki Cave in the Beskid Mały. Kras i Speleologia
7(XVI): 94-101.
Wehrli B. 1990. Redox reactions of metal ions at mineral surfaces. In: W Stumm, editor.
Aquatic chemical kinetics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, p 311–336.
Wehrli, B., G. Friedl and A. Manceau (1995). "Reaction rates and products of manganese
oxidation at the sediment-water interface." Advances in chemistry series (USA).
Went, F. (1969). "Fungi associated with stalactite growth." Science 166(3903): 385-386.
White House Press Release, 2004, President Bush Announces New Vision for Space
Exploration Program, Washington, D.C., Office of the White House Press Secretary, p. 1–
3.
White W.B., 1961 – Cave mineral studies, 1955-1960. National Speleological Society
News, 19(8): 94.
White W.B., 1976 – Cave minerals and speleothems. In: Ford T.D. & Cullingford C.H.D.
(Eds.), The science of speleology. London: Academic Press: 267- 327.
White W.B., 1997 – Thermodynamic equilibrium, kinetics, activation barriers, and reaction
mechanisms for chemical reactions in karst terrains. Environmental Geology, 30(1/2): 46-
58.
White WB, Culver DC (2000) Cave, definition of. In: Culver DC, White WB (eds).
Encyclopedia of Caves. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA, pp. 81–85
White, W. B., C. Vito and B. E. Scheetz (2009). "The mineralogy and trace element
chemistry of black manganese oxide deposits from caves." Journal of Cave and Karst
Studies 71(2): 136-143.
Wichlacz, P.L. and R.F. Unz. (1981), “Acidophilic Heterotrophic Bacteria of Acidic Mine
Waters”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41:1254-1261.
Williams, R. (2016). The geology of fountains Abbey, North Yorkshire.
Williamson, M. A. and J. D. Rimstidt (1994). "The kinetics and electrochemical rate-
determining step of aqueous pyrite oxidation." Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 58(24):
5443-5454.
Wollast R., Reinhart-Derie D., 1977 – Equilibrium and mechanism of dissolution of Mg-
calcites. In: Andersen N.R. & Malahoff A. (Eds.), The fate of the fossil fuel CO2 in the
ocean. New York: Plenum Press: 479- 493.
Woo K.S., Choi D.W., Kim R. & Kim J.K., 2000 The origin of the speleothems in
Dangcheomul Cave, Jeju Island, Korea. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 36(4):
411-434.
Wu Z, Yuan L, Jia N, Wang Y and Sun L (2009) Microbial biomineralization of iron
seepage water: implication for the iron ores formation in intertidal zone of Zhoushan
Archipelago, East China Sea. Geochemical Journal 43: 167-177.
Yang C, Azad HR, Cooksey DA. 1996. A chromosomal locus required for copper
resistance, competitive fitness, and cytochrome c biogenesis in Pseudomonas fluorescens.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7315–20
Yang H, Ding W, Zhang CL, et al. (2011) Occurrence of tetraether lipids in stalagmites:
Implications for sources and GDGT-based proxies. Organic Geochemistry 42: 108-115.
Zawierucha L, 1986. Zarys typologii jaskiń pseudokrasowych Beskidów i Pogórza
Karpackiego. In: Inwentarz jaskiń beskidzkich p. V. PTTK, Speleoklub Bielsko-Biała, pp.
16-18.
Zinsser, H. (1988). "Antimicrobial agents, 9th chapter." Zinsser Microbiology, Prentice
Hall International, UK: 128-160. Adetutu, E.M., and Ball, A.S., 2014, Microbial diversity
and activity in caves: Microbiology Australia. 192- 194.
Adetutu, E.M., Thorpe, K., Shahsavari, E., Bourne, S., Cao, X., Fard, R.M.N., Kirby, G.,
and Ball, A.S., 2012, Bacterial community survey of sediments at Naracoorte Caves,
Australia: International Journal of Speleolology. v. 41. p. 137-147.
Aitken, M.A., 2012, Phenol: Chloroform: Isoamyl Alcohol
(25:24:1).http://www.nhm.ac.uk/resources-rx/files/phenol-chloroform_aug12-118646.pdf
Al-Ajlani, M.M., and Hasnain, S., 2010, Bacteria exhibiting antimicrobial activities;
screening for antibiotics and the associated genetic studies: Journal of The Open
Conference Proceedings; 1.
Al-Gelawi, M.H., Haddar, H.O., and Aziz, G.M., 2007, Optimization of bacitracin
production by Bacillus licheniformis B5: Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. v. 10. v.
972-976.
Al-Janabi, A.A.H.S., 2006, Identification of bacitracin produced by local isolate of Bacillus
licheniformis: African Journal of Biotechnology. v. 5. p. 1600-1601.
Aslim, B., Saglam, N., and Beyatali Y. 2002, Determination of some properties of Bacillus
isolated from soil: Turkish Journal of Biology. p. 41-48.
Atlas, R.M. and Bartha, R. 1998. Microbial Ecology: Fundamentals & Applications, 4th
edition. Benjamin/Cummings Pubs. Company Inc. Calif. (8)
Barton, H.A., 2007, Introduction to cave microbiology: A review for the non-specialist:
Journal of Cave and Karst Studies. v. 68. p. 43–54.
Barton, H.A., and Jurado, V., 2007, What's up down there? Microbial diversity in caves:
Microbe. v. 2, no. 3. p. 132-138.
Basak, K., and Majumdar, S. K., 1975, Mineral nutrition of Streptomyces kanamyceticus
for kanamycin formation: Antimicrobial Agent Chemotherapy. v. 8, no. 4. p. 391–395.
Berdy, J., 1974, Recent developments of antibiotic research and classification of antibiotics
according to chemical structure: Advance and Applied Microbiology. v. 18. p. 309-406.
Berdy, J., 2005, Bioactive microbial metabolites: The Journal of Antibiotics. v. 58, no. 1,
p. 1-26.
Boston, P.J., Spilde, M.N., Northup, D.E., Melim, L.A., Soroka, D.S., Kleina, L.G., Lavoie,
K.H., Hose, L.D., Mallory, L.M., Dahm, C.N., Crossey, L.J., and Schelble, R.T., 2001,
Cave biosignature suites: Microbes, minerals and Mars. Astrobiology Journal, v. 1, p. 25-
55.
Brock, D.T., and Madigan, M.T., 1991, Biology of Microorganisms: p. 900. Prentice-Hall
International Inc.
Chamley, H., 1989, Clay sedimentology: Springer-Verlag New York.
Cheng, X., Kumar, S., Posfai, J., Pflugrath, J.W., and Roberts, R.J., 1993, Crystal structure
of the HhaI DNA methyl transferase complexed with S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Cell. v.
74, p. 299–307.
Cuezva, S., Sánchez Moral, S., Saiz-Jimenez, C., and Cañaveras, J.C., 2009, Microbial
communities and associated mineral fabrics in Altamira Cave, Spain: International Journal
of Speleology, v. 38, no. 1, p. 83-92.
Dancer, S. J., 2004, How antibiotics can make us sick: the less obvious adverse effects of
antimicrobial chemotherapy: The Lancet Infectious Diseases. v. 4, p. 611-619.
Davies, W.E., and Morgan, I.M., 2000, Geology of Caves. US Geological Survey US
Geological Survey. http://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/usgsnps/cave/cave.html. This site
was last updated on 9/5/00
Demain, A.L., Aharonowitz, Y., and Martin, J.F., 1983, Metabolite control of secondary
biosynthetic path-ways. In Vining LC (ed), Biochemistry and Genetic Regulation of
Commercially Important Antibiotics. Addison-Wesley, London. p. 49–67.
Doak, B. W., and Gallagher, P. J., 1965, Low-temperature calcination of C-grade phosphate
from Christmas island-I. Growth and yield characteristics: New Zealand Journal of
Agriculture Research. v. 8. p. 15-29.
Doull, J.L., and Vining, L.C., 1990, Physiology of antibiotic production in actinomycetes
and some underlying control mechanisms: Biotechnology advances, v. 8, no. 1, p. 141-158.
Ducluzeau., J.R., Dubos, F., Raibaud, P., and Abrams, G.D., 1978, Production of an
antibiotic substance by Bacillus licheniformis with in the digestive tract of gnotobiotic
mice: Antimicrobial Agents of Chemotherapy. v. 13. p. 97-103.
Ebrahimipour, G., Moradi, A., Mehrdad, M., Marzban, A., and Alaee, H., 2010, Evaluation
of antimicrobial substance produced by a bacterium isolated from Parmacellaiberica.
Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. v. 4. p. 131-141.
Eldewany, AI.,Alaa-El-Din, M.S., and Sheir, D.H., 2011, Production of antimicrobial
agent from marine bacteria isolated from Mediterranean: Australian Journal of Basic and
Applied Sciences. v. 5. p. 121-128.
Engel, A., Zondervan, I., Aerts, K., Beaufort, L., Benthien, A., Chou, L., Delille, B.,
Gattuso, J.P., Harlay, J., and Heemann, C., 2005, Testing the direct effect of CO2
concentration on a bloom of the coccolithophorid Emilianiahuxleyi in mesocosm
experiments: Limnology and Oceanography, v. 50, no. 2, p. 493-507.
FAO/SIDA., 1983, Manual of methods in aquatic environmental research, Part 9: Analysis
of metals and organochlorines in fish: FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 212.
Fontoura, R., Spada, J.C., Silverira, S.T., Tsai, S.M., and Brandelli, A., 2009, Purification
and characterization of an antimicrobial peptide produced by Pseudomonas sp. strain 4B:
World Journal of Microbial Biotechnology. v. 25. p. 205-213.
Frost, R.L., and Hales, M.C., 2009, Thermogravimetric analysis of selected group (II)
carbonate minerals Implication for the geosequestration of greenhouse gases: Journal of
Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. v. 95. p. 999-1005.
Gauthier, M. J., 1976, Modification of bacterial respiration by a polyanionic antibiotic
produced by a marine Alteromonas: Antimicrobial Agents Chemotherapy. v. 9. p. 361–
366.
Geochemical Instrumentation and Analysis. (http://serc.carleton.edu/research_education/
geochemsheets/ techniques/ XRD.html).
Georgieva-Borisova, J.Ch., 1974. Taxonomic characteristics of strain Actinomyces
hygroscopicus B-255 and conditions for its antibiotic production. Ph. D. Thesis, Sofia.
Gesheva, V., Ivanova, V., and Gesheva, R., 2005, Effects of nutrients on the production of
AK-111-81 macrolide antibiotic by Streptomyces hygroscopicus: Microbiological
research, v. 160, no. 3, p. 243-248.
Groth, I., Vetterman, R., Schuetze, B., Schumann, P., and Himenez, S.C. 1999,
Actinomycetes in karstic caves of Northern Spain (Altamira and Tito Bustillo): Journal of
Microbial Methods. v. 36. p. 115-122.
Gulahmadov, S. G., Batdorj, B., Dalgalarrondo, M., Chobert, J. M., Kuliev, A. A., and
Haertle, T., 2006, Characterization of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) from
lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Azerbaijani cheeses: European Food Research
and Technology, v. 224, no. 2, p. 229-235.
Hancock, R.E., and Chapple, D.S., 1999, Peptide antibiotics: Antimicrobial Agents and
Chemotherapy, v. 43, no. 6, p. 1317-1323.
He, L., Chen, W., and Liu, Y., 2006, Production and partial characterization of bacteriocin
like pepitdes by Bacillus licheniformis ZJU12: Microbiological Research. v. 161. p. 321-
326.
Hill, C.A., 1999, Mineralogy of Kartchner Caverns, Arizona: Journal of Cave and Karst
Studies. v. 61. p. 73-78.
Holt, J.G., Bergey, D.H., and Krieg, N.R., 2012, Bergey’s Manual of Determinative
Bacteriology, 9th edition.
Ikner, L.A., Toomey, R.S., Nolan, G., Neilson, J.W., Pryor, B.M., and Maier, R M., 2007,
Culturable microbial diversity and the impact of tourism in Kartchner Caverns, Arizona:
Microbial Ecology, v. 53, no. 1, p. 30-42.
Iwai, Y., Awaya, J., Kesado, T., Yamada, H., Omura, S., And Hata, T., 1973, Selective
production of cerulenin by Cephalosporium caerulens KF-140: Journal of Fermentation
Technology. v. 51, p. 575-581.
Jeong, G.Y., and Kim, S.J., 2003, Black carbon pollution of speleothems by fine urban
aerosols in tourist caves: American Mineralogist. v. 88. p. 1872-1878.
Jordán, A., 2014, http://blogs.egu.eu/divisions/sss/2014/01/09/soils-going-red-terra-
rossa/Soils going red: Terra rossa.
Jurado, V., Grau, J.M.G., Trobajo, L.L., and Sáiz-Jiménez, C., 2006, Aurantimonas
altamirensissp. nov., a member of the order Rhizobiales isolated from Altamira Cave:
International Journal of Systemic Evolutionary Microbiology. v. 56, p. 2583-2585.
Kong, J., and Shaoning, Y.U., 2007, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic Analysis of
Protein Secondary Structures: Acta Biochimica Biophysica Sinica. v. 39. p. 549–559.
Kumar, S., Malhotra, R., and Kumar, D., 2010, Antihyperglycemic, antihyperlipidemic and
antioxidant activities of Euphorbia Hirta stem extract: International Research Journal of
Pharmacy. v. 1, p. 150-156.
Laiz, L., Groth, I., Gonzalez, I., and Sáiz-Jiménez, C., 1999, Microbiological study of the
dripping waters in Altamira cave (Santillana del Mar, Spain): Journal of Microbiological
Methods, v. 36, no. 1, p. 129-138.
Lavoie, K.H., and Northup, D.E., 2005, Bacteria as indicators of human impact in caves,
in Proceedings 7th National Cave and Karst Management Symposium, Proceedings:
NICKMS Steering Committee, Albany, NY2006, p. 40-47.
Liu, C.M., McDaniel, L., and Schaffner, C., 1975, Factors affecting the production of
candicidin: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. v. 7, no. 2, p. 196-202.
Luong, P., Kinch, L.N., Brautigam, C A., Grishin, N.V., Tomchick, D.R., and Orth, K.,
2010, Kinetic and structural insights into the mechanism of AMPylation by VopSFic
domain: Journal of Biological Chemistry, v. 285, no. 26, p. 20155-20163.
Manju, C.S., and Nair, V.N., 2001, Mineralogy, geochemistry and utilization study of the
Madayi kaolin deposit, North Kerala, India: Clays and Clay Minerals. v. 49. p. 355-369.
Manoharan, C., and Venkatachalapathy, R., 2007, FTIR and Mossbauer spectroscopy
applied to the study of archaeological artefacts from Maligaimedu, Tamil Nadu, India."
Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics. v. 45. p. 860.
Marel, V.H.W., and Beutelspacher, H., 1976, Atlas of infrared spectroscopy of clay
minerals and their admixtures, Elsevier Publishing Company.
Maritan, L., and Mazzoli, C., 2005, Second Iron Age grey pottery from Este (northeastern
Italy): study of provenance and technology: Applied Clay Sciences. v. 29. p. 31-44.
Marwick, J.D., Wright, P.C., and Burgess, J.G., 1999, Bioprocess intensification for
production of novel marine bacterial antibiotics through bioreactor operation and design:
Journal of Marine Biotechnology. v. 1. p. 495–507.
Millot, G., 1970, Geology of Clays: Weathering, Sedimentology, Geochemistry.
Translated by W.R Farrand and Helene Paquet, Springer Verlag.
Montano, E.T., and Henderson, L.O., 2012, Studies of antibiotic production by cave
bacteria. In Cheeptham N (ed), Cave microbiomes: A novel resource for drug discovery:
Springer Briefs in Microbiology. Springer: p. 109-130.
Muhammad, S.A., Ahmad, S., and Hameed, A., 2009, Antibiotic production by
Thermophilic Bacillus specie SAT-4: Pakistan Journal of Pharmacy. Sci. v. 22. p. 339-345.
Nakamoto, K., 2008, Infrared and raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds,
John Wiley and Sons New York, Chichester, U.K.
Nelson, A.P., 1996, What would real little green men tell us about evolution--and God?
Are we alone? Philosophical implications of the discovery of extraterrestrial life: Book
reviews. p. 160.
Nissen-Meyer, J., and Nes, I.F., 1997, Ribosomally synthesized antimicrobial peptides:
their function, structure, biogenesis, and mechanism of action: Archives of Microbiology,
v. 167, no. 2-3, p. 67-77.
Northup, D., and Lavoie K., 2009, Microorganisms in caves: Encyclopedia of Caves and
Karst. www.bookrags.com.
Onaga, L., 2001, Cashing in on nature’s pharmacy. EMBO Reports. v. 2. p. 263-265.
Palmer, S.J., and Frost, R.L., 2010, Thermal decomposition of Bayer precipitates formed
at varying temperatures. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. v. 100 p. 27-32.
Park, C.W., Lee, H.S., and Kim, Y.S., 1998, Mechanism of MPP(+) induced cytotoxicity
in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y: Journal of Toxicological Sciences. 23 Suppl. v. 2. p.
184-188.
Pereda, A., Summers, R.G., Stassi, D.L., Ruan, X., and Katz, L., 1998, The loading domain
of the erythromycin polyketide synthase is not essential for erythromycin biosynthesis in
Saccharopolyspora erythraea: Microbiology, v. 144, no. 2, p. 543-553.
Perlman, D., and Flickinger, M.C., 1979, Application of oxygen-enriched aeration in the
production of bacitracin by Bacillus licheniformis: Antimicrobial Agents Chemotherapy.
v. 15. p. 282-293.
Pinchuk, I.V., Bressollier, P., Sorokulova, I.B., Verneuil, B., and Urdaci, M.C., 2002,
Amicoumacin antibiotic production and genetic diversity of Bacillus subtilis strains
isolated from different habitats: Research in Microbiology. v. 153. p. 269-276.
Portillo, M.C., Gonzalez, J.M., and Saiz-Jimenez, C., 2008, Metabolically active microbial
communities of yellow and grey colonizations on the walls of Altamira Cave, Spain:
Journal of Applied Microbiology. v. 104. p. 681-691.
Ravisankar, R., Eswaran, P., Rajalakshmi, A., Chandrasekaran, A., Thillaivelavan, K.K.,
and Dhinakaran, B., 2012, Beach rock from the South East Coast of Tamilnadu, India. A
Spectroscopic study: Advances in Applied Sciences. v. 3. p. 95-102.
Rigali, S., Titgemeyer, F., Barends, S., Mulder, S., Thomae, A. W., Hopwood, D. A., and
van Wezel, G. P., 2008, Feast or famine: the global regulator DasR links nutrient stress to
antibiotic production by Streptomyces: EMBO reports. v. 9, no. 7. p. 670-675.
Riley, M.A., and Wertz, J.E., 2002, Bacteriocins: evolution, ecology, and application:
Annual Reviews in Microbiology, v. 56, no. 1, p. 117-137.
Russell, J.D., 1987, A handbook of determinative methods in clay mineralogy: Wilson M.
J (ed). Blackie and Son Ltd.
Sanchez, S., and Demain, A.L., 2002, Metabolic regulation of fermentation processes:
Enzyme and Microbial Technology, v. 31, no. 7, p. 895-906.
Schrader, B., 2008, Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy: Wiley-VCH.
Schwabe, S.J., and Carew, J.L., 1993, The petrology of Bahamian Pleistocene eolianites
and flank margin caves: Implications for Late Quaternary island development. Proceedings
of the Sixth Symposium on the Geology of the Bahamas. Port Charlotte, Florida: Bahamian
Field Station.
Sen, K.S., Haque, F.S., and Pal, C. S. 1995, Nutrient optimization for the production of
broad spectrum antibiotics by Streptomyces. Antibiotics Str. 15.4:Acta Microbiolgica
Hungarica. v. 42. p. 155-162.
Sharga, B.M., Nikolaychuk, V.I., and Maga, M.I., 2004, Comparative IR spectrometry of
antimicrobial substances derived antibiotic from Bacillus: Mikpobiojiotir. v. 15. p. 75-77.
Simmons, J.A., Currie, W.S., Eshleman, K.N., Kuers, K., Monteleone, S., Negley, T.L.,
Pohlad, B.R., and Thomas, C.L., 2008, Forest to reclaimed mine land use change leads to
altered ecosystem structure and function: Ecological Applications, v. 18, no. 1, p. 104-118.
Singh, A. P., and Mishra, S.,2013, Studies on antibiotic production by soil microflora and
their biochemical characterization from different industrial waste polluted soil samples in
(Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand) India: IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Science.
v. 7, no. 4. p. 32-43.
Sirtori, L. S., Cladera-Olivera, F., Lorenzini, D.M., Tsai, S., and Brandelli, A., 2006,
Purification and partial characterization of an antimicrobial peptide produced by Bacillus
sp. strain P45, a bacterium from the Amazon basin fish Piaractus mesopotamicus: Journal
of General Applied Microbiology. v. 52. p. 357–363.
Solivery, S., Mendosa, A., and Arias, M.E., 1988, Effect of different nutrients on the
production of polyene antibiotics PA-5 and PA-7 by Streptoverticillium sp. 43/16 in
chemically defined medium: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. v. 28. p. 254-257.
Stanbury, P.F., Whitaker, A., and Hall, S.J., 1995, Media for industrial fermentations: In
Principles of fermentation technology. p. 93-122. Elsevier Science Ltd, Pergamon, Oxford,
New York, Tokyo.
Stranks, D. R., Heffernan, M. L., Lee Dow, K. C., McTigue, P. T., and Withers, G. R. A.,
1970, Chemistry: A structural view. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.
p. 5. ISBN 0-522-83988-6.
Tabbene, O., Karkouch, I., Elkahoui, S., Cosette, P., Mangoni, M.L., Jouenne, T., and
Limam, V., 2009, A new antibacterial and antioxidant S07-2 compound produced by
Bacillus subtilis B38: Federation of European Microbiological Societies, Microbiology
Letters. v. 303. p. 176–182.
Tanaka. Y., Hosaka, T., and Ochi, K., 2010, Rare earth elements activate the secondary
metabolite–biosynthetic gene clusters in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): The Journal of
Antibiotics. v. 63. p. 477–481.
Tardy, Y., and Nahon, D., 1985, Geochemistry of laterites, stability of Al-goethite, Al-
hematite, and Fe3+-kaolinite in bauxites and ferricretes: an approach to the mechanism of
concretion formation: American Journal of Sciences. v. 285. p. 865-903.
Taylor, J.C., 1991, Computer programs for standard less quantitative analysis of minerals
using the full Powder Diffraction profile: Powder diffraction. v. 6. p. 2-9.
Taylor, J.C., and Clapp, R.A., 1993, New features and advanced applications of
SIROQUANT: a personal computer XRD full profile quantitative analysis software
package: Advances in X-Ray Analysis. v. 35. p. 49-49.
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J., 1994, CLUSTAL W: improving the
sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting,
position-speciÆc gap penalties and weight matrix choice: Nucleic Acids Research. v. 22.
p. 4673-4680.
Tomova, I., Lazarkevich, I., Tomova, A., Kambourova, M., and Tonkova, E. V., 2013,
Diversity and biosynthetic potential of culturable aerobic heterotrophic bacteria isolated
from Magura Cave, Bulgaria: International Journal of Speleology. v. 42, no. 1. p. 65-76.
Uzair, M., Ahmed, M., and Nazim, K., 2009, Effect of industrial waste on seed bank and
growth of wild plants in Dhabeji area, Karachi, Pakistan: Pakistan Journal of Botony. v.
41. p. 1659-1665.
Vedder, W., 1964, Correlations between infrared spectrum and chemical composition of
mica: American Mineralogist. v. 49. p. 736-768.
Vicente, M.A., and Elsass, F., 1997, Palaeo weathering in slates from the Iberian Hercynian
Massif (Spain); investigation by TEM of clay mineral signatures: Clay Minerals. v. 32. p.
435-451.
Viera, A. M., Alencar, A.A., and Alves Da Silva, C. A., 2011, Bacitracin produced by
Bacillus licheniformis (UCP 1014) using economic medium formulated with milk serum:
In Simpósio de Microbiologia Aplicada, Rio Claro. Holos Environment.
Vogel, P.N., and Mylroie, J.E., 1990, Limestone petrology and cave morphology on San
Salvador Island, Bahamas: Cave Sciences. v. 17. p. 19-30.
Voitovich, V.B., Lavrenko, V. A., Voitovich, R. F., and Golovko, E. I., 1994, The effect
of purity on high- temperature oxidation of zirconium: oxidation of metals. v. 42. p. 223–
237.
Weaver, C.E., 1989, Clays, muds, and shales: Development in Sedimentology 44, Elsevier,
Scientific Publication.
White, R.G., 1964, Handbook of Industrial Infrared Analysis: Plenum Press New York.
Yeaman, M.R., and Yount, N.Y., 2003, Mechanisms of antimicrobial peptide action and
resistance: Pharmacology Review. v. 55, no. 1, p. 27-55.
Yilmaz, M., Soran, H., and Beyatli, Y., 2006, Antimicrobial activities of some Bacillus
spp. strains isolated from the soil: Microbiological Research. v. 161. p. 127-131.
Yoshiko, H., Okamoto, S., Muramatsu, H., and Ochi K., 1998, Acquisition of certain
streptomycin resistant mutations enhances antibiotic production in bacteria: Antimicrobial
Agents and Chemotherapy. v. 42. p. 2041-2047.
Yousaf, M., 1997,Studies on the cultural conditions for the production of antibiotic
bacitracin by B. licheniformis. Ph.D. thesis, Islamia University, Bahawalpur.
Zadrapa, P., and Zykova, J., 2010, Preparation of (ethylene-methacrylic acid)
copolymer/vermiculite composites: Proceedings of the 3rd WSEAS International
Conference on Advances in Sensors, Signals and Materials, World Scientific and
Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS): v. p. 30, 75.
Zarei, I., 2012, Biosynthesis of bacitracin in stirred fermenter by Bacillus licheniformis
using defatted oil seed cakes as substrate: Journal of Modern Applied Sciences. v. 6. p. 36-
39.
Zhang, Q., Zhu, B.Q., and Hu, H.F., 2008, Activated antibiotic production by inducing
resistance to apreomycin, Streptomyces lividans and Streptomyces coelicolor: Chinese
Journal of Natural Medicines. v. 6, no. 1, p. 57-62.
Zhao, Q,G., and Yang, H., 1995, A preliminary study on red earth and changes of
Quaternary environment in south China: Quaternary Sciences. v. 15. p. 107-116.
Zhou, X., Kjer, K.M., and Morse, J.C., 2007, Associating larvae and adults of Chinese
Hydropsychidae caddis flies (Insecta: Trichoptera) using DNA sequences: Journal of North
American Benthological Society. v. 26. p. 719-742.
Ziad, W., 2006, A queen consort of the early Kidarite principality of Kashmir
smast:Oriental Numismatic Society Journal. 187.
Adetutu, E.M., and Ball, A.S., 2014, Microbial diversity and activity in caves:
Microbiology Australia, v. 35, no. 4, p. 192–194. doi:10.1071/MA14062.
Anwar, S., Liaquat, F., Khan, Q. M., Khalid, Z. M., and Iqbal, S., 2009, Biodegradation of
chlorpyrifos and its hydrolysis product 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol by Bacillus pumilus
strain C2A1: Journal of Hazardous Materials, v. 168, no. 1, p. 400–405.
doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.059.
Bonhomme, S., Cuer, A., Delort, A.-M, Lemaire, J., Sancelme, M., and Scott, G., 2003,
Environmental biodegradation of polyethylene: Polymer Degradation and Stability, v. 81,
no. 3, p. 441–452. doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(03)00129-0.
Boonchan, S., Britz, M.L., and Stanley, G.A., 2000, Degradation and mineralization of
high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by defined fungal-bacterial
cocultures: Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 66, no. 3, p. 1007–1019.
Ciferri, O., 1999, Microbial degradation of paintings: Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, v. 65, no. 3, p. 879–885.
Cruz, L.F., Cobine, P.A., and De La Fuente, L., 2012, Calcium increases Xylella fastidiosa
surface attachment, biofilm formation, and twitching motility: Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, v. 78, no. 5, p. 1321–1331. doi:10.1128/AEM.06501-11.
Cuezva, S., Fernandez-Cortes, A., Porca, E., Pašić, L., Jurado, V., Hernandez-Marine, M.,
Serrano-Ortiz, P., Hermosin, B., Cañaveras, J.C., Sanchez-Moral, S., and Saiz-Jimenez, C.,
2012, The biogeochemical role of Actinobacteria in Altamira Cave, Spain: FEMS
Microbiology Ecology, v. 81, no. 1, p. 281–290. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01391.x.
Cycoń, M., Wójcik, M., and Piotrowska-Seget, Z., 2011, Biodegradation kinetics of the
benzimidazole fungicide thiophanate-methyl by bacteria isolated from loamy sand soil:
Biodegradation, v. 22, no. 3, p. 573–583. doi:10.1007/s10532-010-9430-4.
De Leo, F., Iero, A., Zammit, G., and Urzì, C.E., 2012, Chemoorganotrophic bacteria
isolated from biodeteriorated surfaces in cave and catacombs: International Journal of
Speleology, v. 41, no. 2, p. 125–136. doi:10.5038/1827-806X.41.2.1.
Ehret, A E., and Böl, M., 2013, Modelling mechanical characteristics of microbial biofilms
by network theory: Journal of The Royal Society Interface, v. 10, no. 78, p. 676–687.
doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0676.
Gu, Ji-Guang, and Gu, Ji-Dong., 2005, Methods currently used in testing microbiological
degradation and deterioration of a wide range of polymeric materials with various degree
of degradability: a review: Journal of Polymers and the Environment, v. 13, no. 1, p. 65–
74. doi:10.1007/s10924-004-1230-7.
Hadad, D., Geresh, S., and Sivan, A., 2005, Biodegradation of polyethylene by the
thermophilic bacterium Brevibacillus borstelensis: Journal of Applied Microbiology, v. 98,
no. 5, p. 1093–1100. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02553.x.
Harshvardhan, K., and Jha, B., 2013, Biodegradation of low-density polyethylene by
marine bacteria from pelagic waters, Arabian Sea, India: Marine Pollution Bulletin, v. 77,
no. 1-2, p. 100–106. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.025.
Hasan, F., Shah, A.A., Hameed, A., and Ahmed, S., 2007, Synergistic effect of photo and
chemical treatment on the rate of biodegradation of low density polyethylene by Fusarium
sp. AF4: Journal of Applied Polymer Science, v. 105, no. 3, p. 1466–1470.
doi:10.1002/app.26328.
Karlsson, S., and Albertsson, A.-C., 1998, Biodegradable polymers and environmental
interaction: Polymer Engineering and Science, v. 38, no. 8, p. 1251–1253.
doi:10.1002/pen.10294.
Kawai, F., 2010, The biochemistry and molecular biology of xenobiotic polymer
degradation by microorganisms: Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, v. 74, no.
9, p. 1743–1759. doi:10.1271/bbb.100394.
Kelly, S.D., Hesterberg, D., and Ravel, B., 2008, Analysis of soils and minerals using X-
ray absorption spectroscopy, in Ulery, A.L., and Drees, L.R., eds., Mineralogical Methods:
Madison, Wisconsin, Soil Science Society of America, Methods of Soil Analysis series 5,
p. 387–463. doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.5.c14.
Khan, M.N., 2013, The early arrival of Muslims in ancient Gandhāra study based on
numismatic evidence from Kashmir Smast: Gandharan Studies, v. 7, p. 111–126.
Lee, B., Pometto, A.L. III, Fratzke, A., and Bailey, T.B., Jr., 1991, Biodegradation of
degradable plastic polyethylene by Phanerochaete and Streptomyces species: Applied and
Environmental Microbiology, v. 57, no. 3, p. 678–685.
Linos, A., Berekaa, M.M., Reichelt, R., Keller, U., Schmitt, J., Flemming, H.-C.,
Kroppenstedt, R.M., and Steinbüchel, A., 2000, Biodegradation of cis-1,4-polyisoprene
rubbers by distinct actinomycetes: microbial strategies and detailed surface analysis:
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 66, no. 4, p. 1639–1645.
doi:10.1128/AEM.66.4.1639-1645.2000.
Margesin, R., Schumann, P., Spröer, C., and Gounot, A.-M., 2004, Arthrobacter
psychrophenolicus sp. nov., isolated from an alpine ice cave: International Journal of
Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, v. 54, no. 6, p. 2067–2072.
doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63124-0.
Matsunaga, M., and Whitney, P.J., 2000, Surface changes brought about by corona
discharge treatment of polyethylene film and the effect on subsequent microbial
colonisation: Polymer Degradation and Stability, v. 70, no. 3, p. 325–332.
doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(00)00105-1.
Nkwachukwu, O.I., Chima, C.H., Ikenna, A.O., and Albert, L., 2013, Focus on potential
environmental issues on plastic world towards a sustainable plastic recycling in developing
countries: International Journal of Industrial Chemistry, v. 4, no. 1, p. 34–46.
doi:10.1186/2228-5547-4-34.
Orhan, Y., and Büyükgüngör, H., 2000, Enhancement of biodegradability of disposable
polyethylene in controlled biological soil: International Biodeterioration &
Biodegradation, v. 45, no. 1-2, p. 49–55. doi:10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00048-2.
Rajandas, H., Parimannan, S., Sathasivam, K., Ravichandran, M., and Yin, Li Su, 2012, A
novel FTIR-ATR spectroscopy based technique for the estimation of low-density
polyethylene biodegradation: Polymer Testing, v. 31, no. 8, p. 1094–1099.
doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.07.015.
Rivard, C., Moens, L., Roberts, K., Brigham, J., and Kelley, S., 1995, Starch esters as
biodegradable plastics: effects of ester group chain length and degree of substitution on
anaerobic biodegradation: Enzyme and Microbial Technology, v. 17, no. 9, p. 848–852.
doi:10.1016/0141-0229(94)00120-G.
Schabereiter-Gurtner, C., Saiz-Jimenez, C., Piñar, G., Lubitz, W., and Rölleke, S., 2002,
Altamira cave Paleolithic paintings harbor partly unknown bacterial communities: FEMS
Microbiology Letters, v. 211, no. 1, p. 7–11. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11195.x.
Shah, A.A., Nawaz, A., Kanwal, L., Hasan, F., Khan, S., and Badshah, M., 2015,
Degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone) by a thermophilic bacterium Ralstonia sp. strain
MRL-TL isolated from hot spring: International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, v. 98,
p. 35–42. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.11.017.
Sharma, A., and Sharma, A., 2004, Degradation assessment of low density polythene
(LDP) and polythene (PP) by an indigenous isolate of Pseudomonas stutzeri: Journal of
Scientific and Industrial Research, v. 63, no. 3, p. 293–296.
Shimao, M., 2001, Biodegradation of plastics: Current Opinion in Biotechnology, v. 12,
no. 3, p. 242–247. doi:10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00206-8.
Tribedi, P., and Sil, A.K., 2013, Low-density polyethylene degradation by Pseudomonas
sp. AKS2 biofilm: Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 20, no. 6, p. 4146–
4153. doi:10.1007/s11356-012-1378-y.
Webb, H.K., Arnott, J., Crawford, R.J., and Ivanova, E.P., 2012, Plastic degradation and
its environmental implications with special reference to poly(ethylene terephthalate):
Polymers, v. 5, no. 1, p. 1–18. doi:10.3390/polym5010001.
Zada, S., Naseem, A.A., Lee, Seong-Joo., Rafiq, M., Khan, I., Shah, A.A., and Hasan, F.,
2016, Geochemical and mineralogical analysis of Kashmir Cave (SMAST), Buner,
Pakistan, and isolation and characterization of bacteria having antibacterial activity:
Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 78, no. 2, p. 94–109. doi:10.4311/2014MB0110.
Adinarayana K, Ellaiah P, Prasad DS. 2003. Purification and partial characterization of
thermostable serine alkaline protease from a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis PE-11.
American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists PharmSciTech. 4, 1-9.
Allemand L, Bahn PG. 2005. Best way to protect rock art is to leave it alone. Nature. 433-
800.
Amro AA, Soheir RS, Mohamed SSA. 2009. The Possibility to Use Bacterial Protease and
Lipase as Biodetergent. Global Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 4, 104-114.
Ankit M, Sunil KY, Mishra P, Yadav SK. 2011. Screening and Temperature Optimization
for Lipase-Producing Bacteria from Waste Contaminated Water. Asian Journal of
Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 1, 62-69.
Balan A, Magalinggam N, Ibrahim D, Rahim RA. 2010. Thermostable Lipase Production
by Geobacillus thermodenitrificans In A 5-L Stirred-Tank Bioreactor. International Journal
of Microbiology. 8,1937-8289.
Ballschmiter M, Futterer O, Liebl W. 2006. Identification and Characterization of a Novel
Intracellular Alkaline-Amylase from the Hyperthermophilic Bacterium Thermotoga
maritima MSB8. Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiolology. 72, 2206–2211.
Banerjee UC, Sani RK, Azmi W, Soni R. 1999. Thermo stable alkaline protease from
Bacillus brevis and its characterization as a laundry detergent additive. Journal of Process
Biochemistry. 35, 213-219.
Bastian F, Alabouvette C, Saiz-jimenez C. 2009. Bacteria and free-living amoeba in the
Lascaux Cave. Journal of Research in Microbiolology. 160, 38-40.
Božić N, Ruiz J, López SJ, Vujčić Z. 2011. Production and properties of the highly efficient
raw starch digesting 𝛼-amylase from a Bacillus licheniformis ATCC 9945a. Biochemical
Engineering Journal. 53, 203–209.
Burg BVD. 2003. Extremophiles as a source for novel enzymes. Current Opinion in
Microbiology. 6, 213-218.
Cañaveras JC, Sanchez MS, Sloer V, Saiz JC. 2001. Microorganisms and microbially
induced fabrics in cave walls. Geomicrobiology Journal. 18, 223-240.
Cuezva S, Sanchez-moral S, Saiz-jimenez C, Canaveras JC. 2009. Microbial communities
and associated mineral fabrics in Altamira cave, Spain. International Journal of
Speleology. 38, 83-92.
Demirkan E. 2011. Production, purification, and characterization of α-amylase by Bacillus
subtilis and its mutant derivates. Turkish Journal of Biology. 35, 705-712.
Engel A, Zondervan I, Aerts K, Beaufort L, Benthien A, Chou L, Delille B, Gattuso JP,
Harlay J, Brussels, Heemann C, Hoffmann L, Jacquet S, Nejstgaard J, Pizay MD, Rochelle-
newall E, Schneider U, Terbrueggen A, Riebesell U. 2004. Testing the direct effect of
CO2 concentration on a bloom of the coccolithophorid Emilianiahuxleyi in mesocosm
experiments. A. Socity. Limnol.Oceanogr. 50, 493–507.
Engel AS. 2010. Microbial diversity of cave ecosystems. Geomicrobiology: Molecular and
Environmental Perspective. New York: Springer. 219-238.
Femi-ola TO, Desmond OO. 2012. Partial purification and characterization of a thermo
stable alkaline protease from Lactobacillus brevis. Malaysian Journal of Microbiology. 8,
1-5.
Foret GM, Moss DA. 1987. Production of enzymes by fermentation. In: Rehm HJ, Reed
G, (Eds), Biotechnology, Weinheim Ver-lag Chemie. 7a, 65-211.
Fox JL. 2008. Some say Lascaux Cave paintings are in microbial “crisis” mode. Microbe.
3, 110-112.
Goyal N, Gupta JK, Soni SK. 2005. A novel raw starch digesting thermostable 𝛼-amylase
from Bacillus sp. I-3 and its use in the direct hydrolysis of raw potato starch. Journal
Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 37, 723–734.
Hailemariam AT, Tilahun BG, Gulelat DH. 2013. Isolation, Purification and
Characterization Thermostable Alpha-Amylase from Geothermal Sites of Ethiopia (Afar
Region): Greener Journal of Biological Sciences. 3, 061-073.
Hasan F, Aamer AS, Hameed A. 2006. Industrial applications of microbial lipases. Enzy
Microb Technol. 39, 235–251.
Hasan F, Hameed A. 2001. Optimization of lipase production from Bacillus sp. Pakistan
Journal of Botany. 33,789-796.
Ikner LA, Toomey RS, Nolan G, Neilson JW, Pryor BM, Maier RM. 2007.Culturable
microbial diversity and the impact of tourism in Kartchner Caverns, Arizona. Microbial
Ecology. 53, 30–42.
Jurado, Gonzalez, Laiz, Saiz, Jimenez. 2006. Aurantimonasaltamirensis sp. nov., a
member of the order Rhizobiales isolated from Altamira Cave. International Journal
of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 56, 2583-2585.
Kathiravan T, Marykala J, Sundaramanickam A, Kumaresan S, Balasubramanian T. 2012.
Studies on nutritional requirements of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for lipase production.
Advances in Applied Science Research. 3, 591-598.
Kavitha M, Shanthi C. 2013. Isolation and Characterization of Cold active lipase producing
Pseudomonas sp. 4 from Marine samples of Tamilnadu Coast. Research Journal of
Biotechnology. 8, 57-62.
Koch R, Spreinat A, Lemke K, Antranikian G. 1991. Purifcation and properties of a
hyperthermoactive 𝛼-amylase from the archaeo bacterium Pyrococcus woesei. Journal of
Archives of Microbiology. 155, 572–578.
Laiza L, Grothb I, Gonzaleza I, Saiz-jimenez C. 1999. Microbiological study of the
dripping waters in Altamira cave (Santillana del Mar, Spain). Journal of Microbiology. 36,
129–138.
Lavoie, Kathleen H, Diana, Northup E. 2005. Bacteria as Indicators of Human Impact in
Caves. Nat. Cave and Karst Management Symposium.
Lee DW, Koh YS, Kim KJ, Kim BC, Choi HJ, Kim DS, Suhartono TM, Pyun YR. 1999.
Isolation and characterization of a thermophilic lipase from Bacillus thermoleovorans ID-
1. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 179, 393-400.
Lee SO, Kato J, Takiguchi N, Kuroda A, Ikeda T, Mitsutani A, Ohtake A. 2000.
Involvement of an Extracellular Protease in Algicidal Activity of the Marine Bacterium
Pseudoalteromonas sp. Strain A28. Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
66, 4334–4339.
Lesuisse E, Schanck K, Coloson C. 1993. Purification and preliminary characterization of
the exracellular lipase of Bacillus subtilis 168, an exteremly basic tolerant enzyme.
European Journal of Biochemistry. 216, 155-160.
Li H, Ziaobo Z. 2005. Characterization of thermostable lipase from thermophilic
Geobacillus sp. TW1. Protein Expression and Purification. 42, 153-159.
Louwrier A. 1998. Industrial products: the return to carbohydrate-based industries.
Biotechnology Applied Biochemestry. 27, 1–8.
Lowry OH, Nira JR, Farr AL, Rose JR. 1951. Protein Measurement with The Folin Phenol
Reagent. Journal Biological Chemistry. 193, 265-275.
Luong P, Kinch, LN, Brautigam CA, Grishin NV, Tomchick DR, Orth K. 2010. Kinetic
and structural insights into the mechanism of AMPylation by VopSFic domain. Journal of
Biolological Chemistry., 285, 20155-63.
Mabrouk SS, Hashem AM, El-shayed NMA, Ismail MS, Abdel FAF. 1999. Optimization
of alkaline protease productivity by Bacillus licheniformis ATCC 21415. Bioresources
Technology. 69, 155-159.
Malhotra R, Noorwez SM, Satyanarayana T. 2000. Production and partial characterization
of thermostable and calcium-independenta-amylase of an extreme thermophile Bacillus
thermooleovorans NP54. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 31, 378-384.
Mayerhofer HJ, Marshall RT, White H, Margaret L. 1973. Characterization of a Heat-
Stable Protease of Pseudomonas fluorescens P261. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 25,
44-48.
Mobarak QE, Kasra KR, Moosavi NZ. 2011. Isolation and identification of a novel, lipase-
producing bacterium, Pseudomnas aeruginosa KM110. Iranian Journal of Microbiology.
3, 92-98.
Najaf MF, Deobagkar D, Deobagkar D. 2005. Purification and characterization of an
extracellular 𝛼-amylase from Bacillus subtilis AX20. Protein Expression and Purification.
41,349–354.
Nascimento WCA, Martins MLL. 2006. Studies on the stability of protease from bacillus
sp. and its compatibility with commercial detergent. Brazilian Journal Microbiology. 37,
307-311.
Nawani N, Singh R, Kaur J. 2006. Immobilization and stability studies of a lipase from
thermophilic Bacillus sp: The effect of process parameters on immobilization of enzyme.
Journal of Microbial Biotechnology. 9: 0717-3458.
Northup E, Diana, Kathleen H, Lavoie. 2009. Microorganisms in Caves. Encyclopedia of
Caves and Karst. www.bookrags.com.
Oliveira AND, Oliveira LAD, Andrade JS. 2010. Partial Characterization of Amylases of
two Indigenous Central Amazonian Rhizobia Strains. Brazilian Archives of Biology and
Technology. 53, 35-45.
Ozgur K, Nilufer C. 2012. Comparison of three Yarrowia lipolytica strains for lipase
production: NBRC 1658, IFO 1195, and a local strain. Turkish Journal of Biology. 36, 15-
24.
Pathak PA, Deshmukh KB. 2012. Alkaline protease production, extraction and
characterization from alkalophilic Bacillus lichenuiformis KBDL4. A Lonar soda lake
isolate. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology. 50, 569-576.
Patil CS, Gangawane AK, Shankerappa SH. 2012. Production and characterization of
alkaline thermostable protease from newly isolated Bacillus sp. Journal of Plant Genetics.
1, 09-17.
Prabhavathi P, Rajendran R, Kuberan T, Shiyamala RG, Raj AJK. 2012. Degradation of
organic wastes and recycling of nutrients enhanced by microbes in subterranean habitat.
African Journal of Microbiology Research. 6, 4449-4456.
Prakash B, Prakash P, Vidyasagar M, Sreeramulu K. 2009b. Effect of organic solvents and
osmolytes on extremely halotolerant and thermostable α-amylases from Chromohalobacter
sp. TVSP 101.International Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 44, 210-215.
Rahman RN, Ra Z, Geok ALP, Basri M, Salleh AB. 2006. An organic solvent-stable
alkaline protease from Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain K: Enzyme purification and
characterization. Enzymes and Microbial Technology. 39, 1484–1491.
Ramesh MV, Lonsane BK. 1990. Effect of metal salts and protein modifying agents on
activity of thermostable 𝛼-amylase produced by Bacillus licheniformis M27 under solid
state fermentation. Chemie, Mikrobiologie, Technologie der Lebensmittel. 12, 129–136.
Rathi P, Bradoo S, Saxena RK, Gupta R. 2000. A hyperthermostable, alkaline lipase from
Pseudomonas sp. with the property of thermal activation. Journal of Biotechnology Letter.
22, 495–498.
Schabereiter GC, Saiz JC, Piñar G, Lubitz W, Rölleke S. 2002a. Altamira cave Paleolithic
paintings harbor partly unknown bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiology Letter. 211,
7-11.
Schabereiter GC, Saiz JC, Piñar G, Lubitz W, Rölleke S. 2002b. Culture-independent
analyses of bacterial communities on paleolithic paintings and surrounding rock walls in
karstic caves (Altamira, Tito Bustillo, La Garma and Llonin). Coalition Newsletter. 5, 7-
10.
Schmidt DC, Sztajer H, Stocklin W, Menge U, Cscmid RD. 1994. Screening purification
and properties of a thermophilic lipase from Bacillus themocatenulants. Biochimica et
Biophysica Acta. 1214, 43-53.
Simmons JA, Currie WS, Eshleman KN, Kuers K, Monteleone S, Negley TL, Pohlad BR,
Thomas CL. 2008. Forest To Reclaimed Mine Land Use Change Leads To Altered
Ecosystem Structure and Function. Ecological Applications. 18,104–118.
Tomova I, Irina L, Anna T, Kambourova M, Vasileva TE. 2013. Diversity and biosynthetic
potential of culturable aerobic heterotrophic bacteria isolated from Magura Cave, Bulgaria.
International Journal of Sepeleology. 42, 65-76.
Urzì C, Leo FD, Bruno L, Albertano P. 2010. Microbial diversity in Paleolithic caves: A
study case on the phototrophic biofilms of the Cave of Bats Zuheros, Spain. Journal of
Microbial Ecology. 60, 116-129.
Usharani B, Muthuraj M. 2010. Production and characterization of protease enzyme from
Bacillus laterosporus. Africation Journal of Microbiology Research. 4, 1057-1063.
Wang Y, Srivastava KC, Shen GJ, Wang HY. 1995. Thermostable alkaline lipase from a
newly isolated thermophilic Bacillus strain A30-1 (ATCC 53841). Journal
of Fermentation and Bioengineering.79, 433–438 (1995).
Wiseman A. 1995. Introduction to principles. Handbook of enzyme biotechnology, 3-8 p.
Ausubel, F.M., Katagiri, F., Mindrinos, M. and Glazebrook, J., 1995. Use of Arabidopsis
thaliana defense-related mutants to dissect the plant response to pathogens. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences, 92(10): 4189-4196.
Badino, G., Bernabei, T., Vivo, T. D., Giulivo, I., and Savino, G., 2004, The mysterious
waters of Quatro Cienegas, Tintoretto, Treviso, v. 288 p.
Bansal, R., Dhami, N. K., Mukherjee, A., & Reddy, M. S. (2016). Biocalcification by
halophilic bacteria for remediation of concrete structures in marine environment. Journal
of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 43(11), 1497-1505.
Barth, N., 2013, Caversham Caves, New Zealand.Breaking the Sea Cave Paradigm. NSS,
v. 71(10), p. 4-14.
Bharathi N. 2014. Calcium Carbonate Precipitation with Growth Profile of Isolated
Ureolytic Strains International Journal of Science and Research, v; 3(9); 2045-2049.
Boquet, E., Boronat, A., and Ramos-Cormenza, A., 1973. Production of calcite (calcium
carbonate) crystals by soil bacteria is a general phenomenon. Nature, v. 246, p. 527-529.
Cailleau P, Dragone D, Girou A, Humbert L, Jacquin C, Roques H (1977) Etude
experimentale de la pr ecipitation des car- bonates de calcium en presence de l’ion magn
esium. Bull Soc Fran Miner Crystallogr 100:81–88
Castainer S, Metayer-Levrel GL, Perthuisot J (2000) Bacterial roles in the precipitation of
carbonate minerals. In: Riding RE, Awramik SM (eds) Microbial sediments. Springer,
Berlin Heidelberg, pp 32–39
Castanier, S., Etayer-Levrel, L. M., and Perthuisot, J. P., 2000, Bacterial roles in the
precipitation of carbonate minerals. In Microbial Sediments eds Riding, R. E. and
Awramik, S. M. Heidelberg, Spr.Verlag, p. 32-39.
Culver, D. C. 1982. Cave life.Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. 189.
De, W. J, Forti, p., Picotti, V., Galli, E. A., Rossi, Brook, G., Zini, L., and Cucchi, F., 2009,
.Cave deposits in cordillera de la Sal (Atacama, Chile). In Rossi P.L. (Ed.), Geological
constrains on the onset and evolution of an extreme environment. The Atacama area
Geoacta, Special Publication, v. 2, p. 113-117.
DeJong, J. T., Mortensen, B. M., Martinez, B. C., and Nelson, D. C., 2010. Bio-mediated
soil improvement. Ecol Eng. v 36, p. 197-210.
Dhami N.K, Reddy M.S, Mukherjee A (2014) Synergistic role of bacterial urease and
carbonic anhydrase in carbonate mineralization. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 172:2552–2561
Dickson, G. W., and Kirk, P.W., 1976, Distribution of heterotrophic microorganisms in
relation to detritivores in Virginia caves. With supplemental bibliography on cave
microbiology and mycology. In B.C. Parker and M.K. Roane, ed the distributional history
of the biota of the Southern Appalachians. Part IV. Algae and Fungi, p 205-226. Uni, Press
of Virginia, Charlotteville, Va.
Engel, A.S., 2010, Microbial diversity of cave ecosystem in Barton LL Mandl.M Loy A
.ed Geomicrobiology molecular and environmental perspective.Spri, Dord. p. 219-238.
Ercole, C., Bozzelli, P., Altieri, F., Cacchio, P. and Del Gallo, M., 2012. Calcium carbonate
mineralization: involvement of extracellular polymeric materials isolated from calcifying
bacteria. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 18(4), p.829.
Fujita, Y., Ferris, F. G., Lawson, R. D., Colwell, F. S., & Smith, R. W. (2000). Subscribed
content calcium carbonate precipitation by ureolytic subsurface bacteria. Geomicrobiology
Journal, 17(4), 305-318.
Fujita, Y., Ferris, F.G., Lawson, R.D., Colwell, F.S. and Smith, R.W., 2000. Subscribed
content calcium carbonate precipitation by ureolytic subsurface bacteria. Geomicrobiology
Journal, 17(4), pp.305-318.
Gat D, Tsesarsky M, Shamir D, Ronen Z (2014) Accelerated microbial- induced CaCO3
precipitation in a defined coculture of ureolytic and non-ureolytic bacteria. Biogeosciences
11:2561–2569
Gillieson, D., 1996, Caves: Processes. Development and Management, Blackwell
Publishers.
Glavan, G., 1997, production of enzymes by mucor fungi isolated from cave cricket
Trogophilus neglectus.Graduation thesis University of Ljublijana Biotechnology Faculty.
p. 64.
Golemansky, V., Bonnet, L., 1994, Protozoa. In: Juberthie, C. and V. Decu (eds.),
Encyclopaedia Biospeleologica, Vol. 1, Société de Biospéologie, 23-33 Moulis, Bucarest.
Groth, I., and Saiz-jimenez, C., 1999. Actinomycetes in hypogean
environments.Geomicrobiol Journal, v. 16, p. 1-8.
Groth, I., Schumann, P., Schuetze, B., Augsten, K., Kramer, I., and Stackebrandt, E., 1999.
Beutenbergia cav-ernaegen.nov.,spec.nov.,anL-lysine-containing actinomycete isolated
from a cave. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. v. 49, p. 1733-1740.
Gulden, B. (2012). USA Long Caves list.
Hammes F, Verstraete W (2002) Key roles of pH and calcium metabolism in microbial
carbonate precipitation. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 1:3–7
Herold, K., Gollmick, F. A., Groth, I., Roth, Menzel, M., Mollmann, K. D., grafe, U. U.,
and Hertweek, C., 2005, Cervimycin A.D.A polyketide glycoside complex from a cave
bacterium can defeat vancomycin resistance chemistry -A European Journal, v.11, p. 5523-
5530
Hill,C. A., and Forti. P., 1997, Cave Minerals of the World. 2ndedit. Huntsville Ala.NSS.
p. 463.
Holt, K.E., Baker, S., Weill, F.X., Holmes, E.C., Kitchen, A., Yu, J., Sangal, V., Brown,
D.J., ˙Coia, J.E., Kim, D.W., Choi, S.Y., 2012. Shigella sonnei genome sequencing and
phylogenetic analysis indicate recent global dissemination from Europe. Nature
genetics, 44(9), pp.1056-1059.
Ikner, L. A., Toomey, R. S., Nolan, G., Neilson, J. W., Pryor, B, M., and Maier, R. M.,
2007, Culturable microbial diversity and the impact of tourism in Kartchner Caverns,
Arizona. Microbiol Eco, v. 53, p, 30-42.
Jiménez-López C, Caballero E, Huertas FJ, Romanek CS (2001) Chemical, mineralogical
and isotope behavior, and phase transfor- mation during the precipitation of calcium
carbonate minerals from intermediate ionic solution at 25 °C. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 65:
3219–3231
Jimenez-Lopez C, Rodriguez-Navarro A, Dominguez-Vera JM, Garcia- Ruiz JM (2003)
Influence of lysozyme on the precipitation of calci- um carbonate: a kinetic and
morphologic study. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 67:1667–1676
Kambesis, P., 2007. The importance of cave exploration to scientific research: J. Cave and
Karst Studies, v. 69, p. 4.
Kitano Y, Akira T, Arakaki T (1979) Magnesium calcite synthe- sis from calcium
bicarbonate solution containing magnesium and barium ions. Geochem J 13:181–185
Kohnhauser, K., 2007, Introduction to Geomicrobiology. Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishing.
Kremer B, Kazmierczak J, Stal LJ (2008) Calcium carbonate precipitation in
cyanobacterial mats from sandy tidal flats of the North Sea. Geobiology 6:46–56
Laiz, L., 2003, Isolation of cave bacteria and substrate utilization at different temperatures.
J.Geo.v. 20(5), p. 479-489.
Lavoie, K. H., and Northup, D. E., 2005. Bacteria as indicators of human impact in caves,
in Rea, G.T., ed. Proceedings of the 17th National Cave and Karst Management
Symposium Proceedings. Albany, N Y, p. 40-47.
Li W, Liu LP, Chen W, Yu LJ, Li W, Yu H (2010) Calcium carbonate precipitation and
crystal morphology induced by microbial carbonic anhydrase and other biological factors.
Proc Biochem 45:1017–1021
Li, L., Victoria, J. G., Wang, C., Jones, M., Fellers, G. M., Kunz, T. H., and Delwart. E.,
2010, Bat guano virome. predominance of diet ary viruses from insects and plants plus
novel mammalian viruses. J. Viro, v. 84(14), p. 6955-65.
Megušar, F., Sket, B., 1977, on the nature of some organic covers on the
cavewalls.Proceedings of the 6th international congress of Speleology, Academia, p. 159-
161.
Megušar, F., Sket. B., 1977, On the nature of some organic covers on the cave walls.
Proceedings of the 6th international congress of Speleology, Academia, 159-161,
Olomouc.
Mortensen, B. M., Haber, M. J., DeJong, J. T., Caslake, L. F., & Nelson, D. C. (2011).
Effects of environmental factors on microbial induced calcium carbonate
precipitation. Journal of applied microbiology, 111(2), 338-349.
Mortensen., B. M., Haber, M. J., DeJong, J. T., Caslake, L. F., Nelson, D. C., 2011. Effects
of environmental factors on microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation. J Appl
Microbiol, v. 111(2), p, 338-49.
Moya, A., Tambutté, S., Bertucci, A., Tambutté, E., Lotto, S., Vullo, D., ... & Zoccola, D.
(2008). Carbonic anhydrase in the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata characterization,
localization, and role in biomineralization. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 283(37),
25475-25484.
Northup, D. E., Beck, K. M., and Mallory, L. M., 1997. Human impact on the microbial
communities of Lechuguilla Cave. Is protection possibleduring active exploration? J. Cave
and Karst Studies, v. 59(166), p. 6-58.
Onac, B. P., Effenberger, H. S., and Breban, R. C., 2007, High temperature and exotic
minerals from the Cioclovina Cave, Romania: a review. Studia UBB Geologia, v. 52(2), p.
3-10.
Palmer, A. N., and Palmer. M., 2009, Geologic overview in Palmer AN and Palmer MV
(eds).caves and karst of the USA.National Speleological Society,inc:Huntsville, AL. p.1-
16.
Porter, J. N., 1971, Prevalence and distribution of antibiotic-producing actinomycetes.
Adv. Appl. Microbiol. v. 14, p. 73-92.
Poulson, T. L., and White, W. B., 1969, The cave environment. Sci, v. 165, p. 971-981.
Rabbe, S., 1988, Coastal Caves indicating preglacial Morphology“cave science’’the
transaction of British cave Research Association, v. 15(3) p. 99-103.
Riding, R., 2000, Microbial carbonates. The geological record of calcified bacterial and
algal mats and biofilms. Sedimentol, v. 47, p. 179-214.
Rothschild, L. J., and Mancinelli, R. L., 2001, Life in extreme environments. Nature, v.
409, p. 1092–1101.
S. Zada, A.A. Naseem, S.-J. Lee, M. Rafiq, I. Khan, A.A. Shah, and F. Hasan., 2016.
Geochemical and mineralogical analysis of Kashmir Cave (SMAST), Buner, Pakistan, and
isolation and characterization of bacteria having antibacterial activity. Journal of Cave and
Karst Studies, 78(2):94-109.
Sayoko Y, Kitano Y (1985) Transformation of aragonite to cal- cite through heating.
Geochem J 19:245–249
Schabereiter-Gurtner., C, Saiz-Jimenez, C, Pinar, G., Lubitz, W., and Rolleke, S., 2002,
Cave paleolithic paintings harbour complex and partly unknown microbial communities,
FEMS Microbiol Letter,. 211, 7-11.
Seifan, M., Samani, A. K., & Berenjian, A. (2017). New insights into the role of pH and
aeration in the bacterial production of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). Applied Microbiology
and Biotechnology, 1-12.
Shoji, S., Miyake, M., Takeuchi, Y., 1964, Comparison of methods of available soil
phosphorus determination. II. Correlation between soil tests and “A” values. Res Bull
Hokkaido Natl Agric Exp Stn, 84, 32-39.
Sprocati AR, Alisi C, Tasso F, Vedovato E, Barbabietola N, Cremisini C. 2008. A
microbiological survey of the Etruscan Mercareccia tomb (Italy): Contri- bution of
microorganisms to detrioration and restoration. In 9th International Conference on NDT of
Art, Jerusalem, Israel.
Tamura, K., Nei, M., and Kumar, S., 2004, Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies
by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
(USA), v.101, p. 11030-11035.
Vahabi, A., Ramezanianpour, A. A., Sharafi, H., Zahiri, H. S., Vali, H., & Noghabi, K. A.
(2015). Calcium carbonate precipitation by strain Bacillus licheniformis AK01, newly
isolated from loamy soil: a promising alternative for sealing cement‐ based
materials. Journal of basic microbiology, 55(1), 105-111.
Vanden-Burg, B., 2003, Extremophiles as a source for novel enzymes. Current Opinion in
Microbiology, v. 6, p. 213-218.
Wei S, Cui H, Jiang Z, Liu H, He H, Fang N (2015) Biomineralization processes of calcite
induced by bacteria isolated from marine sedi- ments. Braz J Microbiol 46:455–464
Zalar, P., Hennebert, G. L., Gunde-Cimerman, N., and Cimerman. A., 1997, Mucor
troglophilus, a new species from cave crickets. Mycotaxon, v. 65, p. 507-516 Ithaca.
Ziad, W., 2006, "Treasures of Kashmir Smast, followed by interview with Ijaz Khan"
in Oriental Numismatic Society Journal- Volume 187.
Akob, D.M., Bohu, T., Beyer, A., Schäffner, F., Händel, M., Johnson, C.A., Merten, D.,
Büchel, G., Totsche, K.U., Küsel, K., 2014. Identification of Mn(II)-oxidizing bacteria
from a low pH contaminated former uranium mine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/AEM. 01296-14.
Anderson, C. R., Johnson, H. A., Caputo, N., Davis, R. E., Torpey, J. W., and Tebo, B. M.
(2009). Mn(II) oxidation is catalyzed by heme peroxidases in “Aurantimonas
manganoxydans” strain SI85-9A1 and Erythrobacter sp. strain SD-21. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 75, 4130–4138.
Bento I., Peixoto C., Zaitsev N. and Lindley P. F. (2007) Ceruloplasmin revisited:
structural and functional roles of various metal cation-binding sites. Acta Crystallogr. D63,
240– 248.
Brouwers. G.J, Vijgenboom, E. Corstjens. P.L.A.M, DE Vrind J.P.M. DE Vrind-DE
Jong E. W 2000. Bacterial Mn2+ Oxidizing Systems and Multicopper
Ehrlich HL. 1968. Bacteriology of manganese nodules. II. Manganese oxidation by cell-
free extracts from a manganese nodule bacterium. Appl Microbiol 16:197–202.
Geszvain, K., McCarthy, J. K., and Tebo, B. M. (2013). Elimination of manganese(II,III)
oxidation in Pseudomonas putida GB-1 by a double knockout of two putative multicopper
oxidase genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 357– 366.
Ghiorse, W.C. and Ehrlich, H.L. (1992) Microbial biomin- eralization of iron and
manganese. In Catena Supplement 21: Biomineralization Processes of Iron and
Manganese: Modern and Ancient Environments, edited by H.C.W. Skinner and R.W.
Fitzpatrick, Catena Verlag, Cremlin- gen, Germany, pp. 75–89.
Larsen EI, Sly LI, McEwan AG. 1999. Manganese(II) adsorption and oxidation by whole
cells and a membrane fraction of Pedomicrobium sp. ACM 3067. Arch Microbiol 171:257–
264.
Learman, D. R., Voelker, B. M., Vazquez-Rodriguez, A. I., and Hansel, C. M. (2011).
Formation of manganese oxides by bacterially generated superoxide. Nat. Geosci. 4, 95–
98.
Mann, S.N., Sparks, H.C., and Wade, V.J. (1990) Crystal- lochemical control of iron oxide
biomineralization. In Iron Biominerals, edited by R.B. Frankel and R. P. Blake- more,
Plenum Press, New York, pp. 21–49.
Mayanna. S, Peacock. CL, Schaffner. F, Grawunder. A, Merten. D, Kothe. E, and Buchel.
G (2015) Biogenic precipitation of manganese oxides and enrichment of heavy metals at
acidic soil pH. J Chemical Geology 402: 6-17.
Miyata N, Tani Y, Sakata M, Iwahori K. 2007. Microbial manganese oxide formation and
interaction with toxic metal ions. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 104:1– 8.
Nealson KH. 2006. The manganese-oxidizing bacteria, p 222–231. In Balows A, Trüper
HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer K-H (ed), The prokaryotes. Springer, New York,
NY.
Nealson, K.H. (1983) Microbial oxidation and reduction of manganese and iron. In
Biomineralization and Biolog- ical Metal Accumulation, edited by P. Westbroek and E.W.
de Jong, D. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 459–479.
Nealson, K.H., Tebo, B.M., and Rosson, R.A. (1988) Oc- currence and mechanisms of
microbial oxidation of manganese. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 33, 279–318.
Nelson, Y.M., Lion, L.W., Ghiorse, W.C., Shuler, M.L., 1999. Production of biogenic Mn
oxides by Leptothrix discophora SS-1 in a chemically defined growth medium and
evaluation of their Pb adsorption characteristics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65 (1), 175–
180.
Oxidases: An Overview of Mechanisms and Functions. J. Geomicrobiology, 17: 1-24.
Santelli, C.M., Chaput, D.L., Hansel, C.M., 2014. Microbial communities promoting Mn
(II) oxidation in Ashumet Pond, a historically polluted freshwater pond undergoing
remediation. Geomicrobiol J. 31 (7), 605–616.
Tanaka, K., et al., 2010. A specific Ce oxidation process during sorption of rare earth ele-
ments on biogenic Mn oxide produced by Acremonium sp. strain KR21-2. Geochim.
Cosmochim. Acta 74 (19), 5463–5477.
Tebo B, Clement B, Dick G. 2007. Biotransformations of manganese, p 1223–1238. In
Hurst CJ (ed), Manual of environmental microbiology, 3rd ed. ASM Press, Washington,
DC.
Tebo BM, Bargar JR, Clement BG, Dick GJ, Murray KJ, Parker D, Verity R, Webb SM.
2004. Biogenic manganese oxides: properties and mechanisms of formation. Annu. Rev.
Earth Planet. Sci. 32:287–328.
Tebo, B.M., Ghiorse, W.C., van Waasbergen, L.G., Siering, P.L., and Caspi, R. (1997)
Bacterially mediated mineral formation: insights into manganese (II) oxidation from
molecular genetic and biochemical studies. In Reviews in Mineralogy, Vol. 35:
Geomicrobiology: Interactions Be- tween Microbes and Minerals, edited by J.F. Banfield
and K.H. Nealson, Mineralogical Society of America, Wash- ington, DC, pp. 225–266.
Tebo, B.M., Johnson, H.A., McCarthy, J.K., Templeton, A.S., 2005. Geomicrobiology of
manganese (II) oxidation. Trends Microbiol. 13 (9), 421–428.
van Waasbergen LG, Hildebrand M, Tebo BM (1996) Identification and characterization
of a gene cluster involved in manganese oxidation by spores of the marine Bacillus sp.
strain SG-1. J Bacteriol 178: 3517–3530.
Villalobos, M., Toner, B., Bargar, J., Sposito, G., 2003. Characterization of the manganese
oxide produced by Pseudomonas putida strain MnB1. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67 (14),
2649–2662.
Zhu, M., Ginder-Vogel, M., Parikh, S.J., Feng, X.H., Sparks, D.L., 2010. Cation effects on
the layer structure of biogenic Mn-oxides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (12), 4465–4471.
Zhu, M., Ginder-Vogel, M., Parikh, S.J., Feng, X.H., Sparks, D.L., 2010. Cation effects on
the layer structure of biogenic Mn-oxides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (12), 4465–4471.
Top Related