Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
1
CDF: Status Report
Status of the TevatronStatus of the CDF detectorFirst results with Run II dataRun IIB upgradesMOF status
Outline
Main Injector
Tevatron
CDF
Franco BedeschiINFN - Pisa Riunione Gruppo 1Catania, 18/9/02
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
2
Tevatron status
Tevatron operation updateLuminosity goals for run 2a:
5-8x1031 cm-2sec-1 w/o Recycler
2x1032 cm-2sec-1 with Recycler
Achieved:2.8x1031 cm-2sec-1 in July ’02
June shutdown to fix p-bar cooling
54 pb-1 delivered until early June35 pb-1 are on tape
10 – 20 pb-1 used for analyses shown at Summer Conferences
February 02 - June 02 period
Sample doubled with new data
Integr. Luminosity
Delivered
On tape
54 pb-1
35 pb-1
0
10
20
30
40
1/1/02 4/1/02 6/30/02 9/28/02 12/27/02
Date
x 1
0^
30 Peak
luminosity
Slow increase
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
3
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1-Jan-02 1-Apr-02 30-Jun-02 28-Sep-02 27-Dec-02
Date
pb
^-1 2002 delivered luminosity
Church planLinerar extr.Quadratic extr.
Tevatron status
Short term plans:Run until new year
Load on Italian group foreign travel increased (shifts, on-call, etc.)Reach goal w/o Recycler:
5-8x1031 cm-2sec-1
1-2 months shutdownComplete Recycler work
Commission and integrate Recycler during 2003
Mostly in parallel with Tevatron colliding beam operation
Expect 100 – 150 pb-1 delivered in 2002 ~ Run 1 data set
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
4
Tevatron Status
Run IBRunIIA Goal
(wo/ recycling)RunIIA
(achieved*)
Protons/bunch 2.30E+11 2.70E+11 1.75E+11
Antiprotons/bunch 5.50E+10 3.00E+10 14.7E+09
Total Antiprotons 3.30E+11 1.08E+12 5.30E+11
Antiproton Production Rate 6.0E+10 2.0E+11 1.1E+11 hour-1
Accumulator->150 GeV efficiency
0.80 0.90 0.80
150 GeV -> Low efficiency 0.80 0.90 0.60Accumulator -> low efficiency 0.64 0.81 0.48Proton emittance (95%, norm) 23 20 16 mm-mrPbar emittance (95%, norm) 13 15 15 mm-mrBeta @ IP 0.35 0.35 0.35 mBeam Energy 900 1000 980 GeVBunches 6 36 36Longitudinal Emittance (protons) 5 3 4 eV-secLongitudinal Emittance (pbars) 5 3 4 eV-secForm Factor (Hourglass) 0.59 0.70 0.65Typical Luminosity 1.6E+31 8.08E+31 2.64E+31 cm-2sec-1
*”Achieved” refers to simultaneous performance. Best individual parameters are higher.
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
5
Injection and acceleration
Shot 1583 showing:Loading of 36 proton
bunches at 150 GeVPoor lifetime at 150 GeVSignificant beam loss on
accelerationLoading of 9x4 antiproton
bunches at 150 GeVDitto
Luminosity potential3.6E31 if acceleration
losses eliminated, >4E31 if lifetime improved.
antiprotons
protons
Beam current
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
6
Tevatron Status
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1-Jan-02 1-Apr-02 30-Jun-02 28-Sep-02 27-Dec-02
Date
x 1
0^
30 Peak luminosity
Church plan
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1-Jan-02 1-Apr-02 30-Jun-02 28-Sep-02 27-Dec-02
Date
x 10
^9
p-bar/bunch
Church plan
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1-Jan-02 1-Apr-02 30-Jun-02 28-Sep-02 27-Dec-02
Date
p-bar transfer efficiencyChurch plan
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1-Jan-02 1-Apr-02 30-Jun-02 28-Sep-02 27-Dec-02
Date
x 10
^9 protons/bunch
Church plan
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
7
CDF data taking efficiency
Avg. efficiency in data taking ~80%Goal is > 90%Reached already in
several occasions
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
8
Status of the CDF Detector
New
Old
Partially new
Forward muonEndplugcalorimeter Silicon and drift
chamber trackers
Central muonCentral calorimeters
Solenoid
Front endTriggerDAQOffline
TOF
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
9
CDF Detector Status
Detector:All systems installed and commissioned
SVX II much improved during June shutdown
10/12 ISL cooling lines cleaned after June shutdown, will finish in January ‘03
DAQ and trigger:Running physics trigger table with > 100 trigger paths since
February ‘02SVT very successful and improving
L2 problems largely solved
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
10
Detector Performance Trigger:
Goal rates for L = 2x1032
L1/L2/L3 = 50,000/300/50 Hz Typical now for L ~ 1031
L1/L2/L3 = 8,000/250/30 Hz
DAQ Logging data at the planned rate of ~ 20 Mbyte/sec
Offline: Data is reconstructed in quasi real time on a dedicated
production farm We take data at ~ same rate as goal luminosity!
Data analysis needs are little affected by low luminosity
3962.5
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
11
Detector Performance
Commissioning:L00 > 95%SVXII > 90% ISL > 80%
Completing cooling work
% of silicon ladders powered and read-out
June shutdownISL almost fixed
* Concern about loss of connection to z-side in special situations. 4 ladders affected recently
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
12
Detector Performance
Silicon detectors:Typical S/N ~12Alignment in R- good
First reliable R-z iteration in production soon
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
13
Detector Performance
TOF resolution within 10 –20% of design value Improving calibrations and
corrections
TOFS/N = 2354/93113
S/N = 1942/4517
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
14
Detector Performance
XFT: L1 trigger on tracksfull design resolution
pT/p2T = 1.8% (GeV-1)
= 8 mrad
Efficiency curve:XFT cut atPT = 1.5 GeV/cXFT
track
Offline
track
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
15
Detector Performance
Secondary VerTex L2 trigger Online fit of primary VtxBeam tilt alignedD resolution as planned
48 m (33 m beam spot transverse size)
15% efficiency increase after downloading updated associative memory patterns (mostly Italian work)
NOT available in analyses that follow
=48 mOnlinetrackimpactparam.
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
16
Physics with CDF-II
Use data to understand the new detector: energy scales in calorimeter and tracking systems detector calibrations and resolutions tune Monte Carlo to data
Use data to do physics analyses Real measurement beyond PR plotsQuality of standard signaturesRates of basic physics signalsSurprisingly some results are already of relevance in spite
of the limited statisticsSeveral CDF presentations made in the parallel sessions
In the following brief/incomplete summary of a lot of work
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
17
Data Sample
Stable physics trigger table established since February ’02Summary of data used for ICHEP2002:
Data period: January – June, 2002 Delivered luminosity: 33.0 pb-1
Live (to-tape): 23.5 pb-1
“Good runs”: 23.3 pb-1
“Good runs” with all systems ~ 10.0 pb-1 (cfr. 110 pb-1 Run 1)
Radiation induced COT/SVX VME power supply failures (fixed!)
Instabilities in Silicon readout (much improved)
New data are waiting for update of production code for processing. Will start full reprocessing in October.
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
18
EM Calorimeter scale
638 Z e+e in 10 pb-1
(M) ~ 4 GeV
Check Z mass in data and simulation after corrections Central region:
Mean: +1.2% data, -0.6% sim.Resolution: +2% simulation
Forward region (Plug):Mean: +10/6.6% data, +2.0% simulationResolution: +4% simulation
Central-central
Central-West plug
Central-East plug
NZ = 247
NZ (W+E) = 391
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
19
Measurements with high Et e±
Uncorrected Z e+e angular distributions and asymmetries
Measurements compared with Pythia/CTEQ5L prediction
BackBack to index
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
20
Measurements with high Et e±
Clear evidence for W e signal Isolated central electronEt > 25 GeV, Et >25 GeV
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
21
Measurements with high Et e±
Good modeling of observed W e distributions
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
22
MET resolution
Minimum bias events Run 1: 0.53/ Et with forward cal. Use ||<4.2 Run II: 0.60/ Et with plug only ||<3.6
With miniplug ||<5.5
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
23
Measurements with high Et e±
W cross section:W*BR(We) (nb) =
2.60±0.07stat±0.11syst ±0.26lum
Consistent with Run 1 results rescaled for higher energy: 2.72±0.02stat±0.08syst ±0.09lum
(use Sterling et al. NNLO predictions)
Nr. Candidates: - 5547 in 10 pb-1
Background:- QCD: 260 ± 34 ± 78- Z ee: 54 ± 2 ± 3- W: 95 ± 6 ± 1
0.16 now!0.10 soon!
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
24
Measurements with high Et ±
Clear evidence of Z +
Signal shown for OS muons detected in both inner and outer muon chambers
- 57 candidate events in 66<Minv<116 range- NZ = 53.2±7.5 ±2.7
1
2
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
25
Measurements with high Et ±
Good modeling of observed W distributions
Measure (W) and R=(W)/(Z)
MET
Longitudinalbeam profile
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
26
Measurements with high Et ±
MT
W cross section:W*BR(W) (nb) =
2.70±0.04stat±0.19syst ±0.26lum
Consistent with Run 1 results rescaled for higher energy: 2.41±0.08stat±0.15syst ±0.16lum
(use Sterling et al. NNLO predictions)Nr. Candidates:
- 4561 in 16 pb-1
Background:- QCD: 104 ± 53- Cosmics: 73 ± 30- Z : 247 ± 13- W: 145 ± 10
R=(W)/(Z) = 13.66±1.94stat±1.12syst
Consistent with Run 1 results
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
27
W
Evidence for typical decay multiplicity in W selections
Back to index
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
28
Measurements with low Et ±
trigger improvedpT
> 2.0 1.5 GeV
> 5° 2.5°
Observed rates are consistent with expected increase due the lowering of the thresholds
13 pb-1
NoSilicon100k
= 21.6 MeV
Centralmuons only
15 MeV with Silicon
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
29
Measurements with low Et ±
Inclusive B lifetime with ’sFit pseudo-c =
Lxy*FMC*M/pT
distribution
Output: b lifetime, fraction of from Bc=458±10 stat. ±11 syst. m
(PDG: 469±4 m)
from B = 17% (pT > 4 GeV)
Resolution function from large prompt componentR = narrow + wide Gaussian (19%)
+ exponential tails (1.2%)Scale factor on error returned from
vertex fit 1.069
Resolutionfunction
~ 46%
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
30
Measurements with low Et ±
Use ’s to understand E-loss and B-field corrections
Check with other known signals
Raw tracks
Correct for material in GEANT
Tune missing material ~20%
Add B scale correction
D0
1S
2S3S
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
31
Measurements with low Et ±
(2S)
Bu
CDF 2002 PDG/(2S) 3686.43±0.54 0.86 6.00
Bu 5280.60±1.70±1.1 0.77 4.05
Bd 5279.80±1.90±1.4 0.17 4.72
Bs 5360.30±3.80± -1.81 1.902.102.90
CDF) PDG)
B masses:(2S)J/ (control)Bu J/
Bd J/Bs J/ More mass plots
lifetime
semi-leptonic B
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
32
Measurements with low Et ±
More mass plots:Bd, Bs
Bs
BackBack to index
BdK*0
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
33
Measurements with low Et ±
B+ lifetime:B+ J/ K+Fit results:
c=446±43±13 m
( PDG/ = 1.2)
Res. scale factor 1.16
Conservative systematic error
# B+ ~ 154
BackBack to index
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
34
Measurements with inclusive leptons
Find large samples of semileptonic B decays
BackBack to index
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
35
Measurements with jets
Raw Et only: Jet 1: ET = 403 GeV Jet 2: ET = 322 GeV
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
36
Measurements with jets
Expectations: Increase max. energy reachStudy both central and forward
New physics is mostly centralPdf’s affect both regions
Current work:Accumulate large samplesUnderstand energy corrections
E-scale, jet shapes, MC tuning
Run 1Run 2aRun 2b
Cen
tral
jet
sF
orw
ard
jet
s
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
37
Measurements with jets
Jet distr. from dataRaw ET
Each trigger
rescaled for
pre-scale factor
Fixed cone algorithm: R = 0.7
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
38
Hadronic Energy Scale
Use J/ muons to measure MIP in hadron calorimeters (Run II)/(Run 1) =
0.96±0.005
Gamma-jet balancing to study jet response fb = (pT
jet – pT)/pT
Run Ib (central): fb= -0.1980 ± 0.0017
Run II (central): fb= -0.2379 ± 0.0028 Plug region corrections in progress
centralcalor. Plug regionPlug region
fb = (4.0 ±0.4)%
q
g q
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
39
Measurements with jets
Jet shapes:Narrower at higher ET
Calorimeter and tracking consistent
Herwig modeling OK
16 pb-1 used for this study
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
40
Measurements with hadronic b triggers
L2 trigger on 2 tracks: pt > 2 GeV
|D| > 100 m (2 body)|D| > 120 m (multibody)
Swamped by D mesons! But see B’s as well…. CDF Run 2 preliminary
D0 K
ND=56320
10 pb-1
D+Ds
+ Ds± - D± mass difference
Both D (KK)m=99.28±0.43±0.27 MeV
PDG: 99.2±0.5 MeV
Systematics dominated by background modeling
23601350
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
41
Measurements with hadronic b triggers(important Italian contribution)
Measure ratios of CKM suppressed decays(DKK)/(DK) = (11.17±0.48±0.98)% (PDG: 10.84±0.45)
Main systematics (8%): background modeling
(D)/(DK) = (3.37±0.20±0.16)% (PDG: 3.76±0.20)Main systematics (4%): relative acceptance
Signal: 5670 Signal: 2020
L = 10 pb-1
CDF Run 2 preliminary CDF Run 2 preliminary
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
42
Measurements with hadronic b triggers
D mesons: What fraction from B?
D0: 16.4-23.1%
D*+: 11.4-20.0%
D+: 11.3-17.3%
Ds+: 34.8-37.8%
GaussianK0S
Range of fract. from B using two extreme resolutions functions: - single gaussian - parametrization from K0
S sample
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
43
Measurements with hadronic b triggers(important Italian contribution)
Hadronic B decays observed Yield lower than expected (silicon coverage/SVT efficiency > x 3) S/N much better than expected
Better S/N dilution compensates reduced statistics
#B+ = 56±12
#B = 33±9
B+ D0 +B h+ h
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
44
Conclusions on Tevatron and detector status
Tevatron is slowly improvingThe CDF detector is fully functional and accumulating
proton anti-proton dataUnderstanding of detector is advancedMany early physics results
sometimes competitive in spite of limited statistics
Ready to exploit full Tevatron potential as luminosity increases
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
45
Run 2B Upgrades
Progetti, motivazioni e richieste complessive degli upgrades per il run 2B discussi in dettaglio nella riunione del Maggio scorso
Progetti che coinvolgono gli italianiNuovo tracker a microstrip (Padova, Bologna, Roma1)Nuovo preradiator (Pisa [Siena], Roma1, Pavia)Aggiunta di timing sui calorimetri elettromagnetici (LNF)
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
46
SVX IIB
Overall design completeBasic element (stave) is near being
built and tested
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
47
Cooling tubes
Mounting holes
Chips
Hybrid Pitch Adapter
Sensors
SVX IIB – The Stave
Wing Cable
Mini PC• 2 sensors/hybrid = 1 module• 3 modules/side• 1 MPC/stave• 1 readout unit/stave• Stave is 66 cm long
Mounts
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
48
SVX IIB R&D advancing fast All stave components available
SVX4 chip, Hybrid, detector, special cables, mechanics, mini-port-card First functioning prototype in October 2002
SVX4 chip
Hybrid
sensors
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
49
Preshower
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
50
Preshower
Basic design understood Important Italian group contributions to R&D
Optimization of tile performanceSimplification of tile construction
Current construction model: Italian groups build basic tile for both preshower
and crack chamberR&D in progress to establish some design
choices:Best scintillator (Dubna/Bicron)Best fibers (Kurarai/PoliHiTech)Coupling of WS fibers
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
51
Preshower
Testing of tiles in progress in Pisa
Test tile
Dubna scint.PoliHiTech fiber
~11 p.e./MIP
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
52
EM Timing
Progress on inductive signal splittersTested during June shutdown operating CEM calibration
LED flashersConfirmed that introducing the splitters only delays the PMT signal by 800 psec
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
53
EM Timing
Want to build as much of the system possible before the January shutdown (shutdown could be later …)
LNF responsible for ASD board, transition board and cables from ASD to TDCTransition board design complete Iterating with FNAL on ASD modifications required
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
54
Run 2B Upgrades
Review degli upgrades per il run 2B continua a FNAL Director/technical review 12 Agosto scorso Finalmente DOE baseline review inizia il 23 settembre
Il comitato invia le raccomandazioni al DOE (P. Rosen – Associate Director for High Energy Physics at Office of Science) che decide poi cosa fare sulla scala dei tempi della meta’ di Novembre
Partecipero’ alla review e dovro’ descrivere quale livello di appoggio l’INFN e’ disposto a dare al progetto
Richieste italiane a bilancio per 2003 includono una parte della produzione e sono consistenti con il piano di Maggio 2002 Importante un parere favorevole della commissione anche se condizionato
all’approvazione del DOE e alla finalizzazione di alcune scelte tecniche
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
55
Run IIB Upgrades
Quadro finanziario del run 2BIl totale M&S+ R&D e’ aumentato solo per la definizione
degli impegni di Bologna (+38 k€) rispetto a Maggio 2002
Plan M&S + Total Funded Requested SJ ProjectProject Subproject Sezione May '02 R&D funded 2002 2003 2003 FTE FTESilicon Mechanics Bologna 38 473 38 5.1 1tracker Chip/PS Padova 335 55 25 130 130 3.1
Trigger Pisa 50 0 0.5Trigger Trieste 50 0 0.5
PreshowerScintillator - fibers- PS - Cables
Pisa 202 202 10 10 120 95 3 2
Pavia 0 0.5Roma1 0 0.5
EM timing LNF 144 144 10 10 134 124 1.9 1.9CSX Scintillator Pisa 80 80 80 80 1.5 1.5Totali 899 899 155 125 422 349 10 10
Gruppo1, Catania – Sett. 2002 F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa
56
MOF 2003
Alla riunione di Maggio del FRC discusso un “ragionevole” bilancio per Operations di 3.1 M$
Naturale contributo italiano (stimato su 82 fisici/66 FTE) $ 410 k
Questo e’ il numero usato per i preventivi 2003 (415 k€)
La certificazione della composizione del bilancio complessivo deve essere fatta da uno “scrutiny group”Mont promette che formera’ presto questo “scrutiny group” Il carico da spartirsi potrebbe crescere!
Bisogna mettere da parte almeno i 415 k€ richiesti
Una parte dovra’ essere SJ alle delibere dello scrutiny group e del FRC nel prossimo anno
Saggio prevedere lo sblocco a Giugno 2003 quindi il finanziamento attuale deve essere consistente
Top Related