$7.95 US / $7.95 CanadaFile Under art and CUltUre diSplay Until September 15, 2010

Joan Jonas by Karin schneider

Edward drostE of Grizzly BEar by rick Moody

ElizaBEth strEB by a.M. homes

JEnnifEr EGan by heidi Julavits

alain MaBancKou by Binyavanga wainaina JEssica JacKson hutchins by stuart horodner

dan ashEr by Ben Berlow cynthia hopKins by annie-B parson

first proof: BoMB’s litErary supplEMEnt

convErsations BEtwEEn artists, writErs, actors, dirEctors, Musicians—sincE 1981

nuMBEr 112 / suMMEr 2010

3 contents

bomb issue 112 / summer 2010

eDiTor’s choice

bomb specificfiona banner

arTisTs on arTisTsfuturefarmers by David van der Leer andrew Lampert by ed haltercordy ryman by stephen Westfall

The WicKGuy richards smit

inTervieWs

aLain mabancKouby binyavanga WainainaTo fellow author Wainaina, mabanckou is a leading writer amongst those building bridges between a divided, postcolonial africa. for his newly translated novel Broken Glass, mabanckou figured out how to write the congolese oral tradition into french. his congo is no heart of darkness.

cynThia hopKinsby annie-b parsonin her most recent theater piece, The Truth: A Tragedy, hopkins tackled head-on her father’s deterioration. annie-b parson rolled the dice to find out how hopkins converts modern-day disturbances into vigorous one-woman productions blending dance, song, plenty of fact, and even more fiction.

Dan asherby ben berlowThe final poignant interview with the prolific, irrepress-ible, and—to anyone who met him—unforgettable new york artist Dan asher, who passed away of leukemia on april 23, 2010.

Joan Jonasby Karin schneidera pioneer of what has become known as performance art, Jonas’s recomposing of literary texts, disparate images, and haunting sounds in the ephemeral media of chalk drawings, video, and theater has created a new Gestalt.

eDWarD DrosTe of GrizzLy bearby rick moodybeginning with the mostly solo Horn of Plenty, Droste’s ringing vocals catapulted Grizzly bear to the fore of brooklyn “freak-folk.” ironic, then, that here he recalls being initially afraid to sing, even for himself.

Joan Jonas, The Shape, The ScenT, The Feel oF ThingS, 2005, video still from multimedia Performance at dia:Beacon. Performer: ragani Haas.

12

25

363840

96

30

42

50

58

68

BomB 1124

This issue is supported in part by public funds from the new york city Department of cultural affairs and the new york state council on the arts, a state agency.

bomb supporters include the andy Warhol arts Writing initiative, the Thanksgiving fund, and bomb’s Trustees.

one year/four issuesus: $22.00inTernaTionaL: $42.00subscribe aT bombsiTe.com

Jessica JacKson huTchinsby stuart horodnerJessica Jackson hutchins’s sculptures reference the human body in all of its dumb charm and joyful habits. With horodner she reflects on Levinas, contingency, and chinese scholar’s rocks.

Jennifer eGanby heidi JulavitsA Visit from the Goon Squad is egan’s fifth book; its polyphonic structure mirrors the undeniable fact that characters, like people, are central to themselves yet peripheral to others. To fellow writer Julavits, each chapter is an ice-core sample, and egan an expert paleoclimatologist drilling through the layers.

eLizabeTh sTrebby a.m. homesa master manipulator of spatial movement who has re-defined the parameters of dance, “streb” has become a verb for “pop action.” novelist a.m. homes and the action heroine discuss overcoming gravity.

firsT proof: bomb’s LiTerary suppLemenT

eva LunDsaGerportfolio

barbara broWninG“santutxo etxeberria”

DanieLLe DuTTonfiction for Driving across america: from SPrAwl

mac WeLLmanfrom linda Perdido

eLizabeTh WiLLispoems

Tan Lin“a short history of a Limited edition”

zach samaLin“hot on the hunt”

sebasTiaan bremerportfolio

Kim rosenfieLDfrom lividity

First Proof is sponsored in part by the bertha and isaac Liberman foundation.

upcominG Web excLusive inTervieWsbombsiTe.com

raLph baKshiby morgan miller

maya beiserby bill morrison

sharon hayes & LaWrence Weiner

arLene shecheTby Jane Dickson

brian uLrichby Lynn saville

bomb (issn 0743–3204) (usps #773–130) is published march, June, september, and December for $22.00 per year by:

neW arT pubLicaTions80 hanson place, #703brooklyn, ny 11217718–636–9100generalinquiries@bombsite.comperiodicals postage paid at brooklyn, ny, and additional mailing offices. posTmasTer send address changes to: bomb, subscription Departmentp. o. box 23024 Jackson, ms 39225–3024

usa neWssTanD DisTribuTion newsstand circulation through Disticor newsstand services.

for more informaTioncall: 718–636-9100 x106 email: alexis@bombsite.com

bomb is indexed in humanities international complete.

The entire contents of bomb and bombsite.com are copyright © 2009/2010 by new art publications, inc., and may not be reproduced in any manner, either in whole or in part, without written permission from the publisher. all rights are reserved. bomb subscripTions To order, call 866–354–0334subscription Departmentp. o. box 23024Jackson, ms 39225–3024

74

82

88

2

5

12

15

17

18

20

27

30

10 BomB 112

BomB 29tH anniversary gala & silent auction

aPril 27, 2010tHe national arts cluBnew york city

Honoring:cecily Brown & nicolai ouroussoffgaBriel orozconancy sPector

brice marden & Gabriel orozco ** betsy sussler **

Klaus Kertess **

rob pruitt, cecily brown, & nicolai ouroussoff **

matthew barney & nancy spector ** Thomas Woltz, cary brown-epstein, & Tom bolt **

raquel Tudela & Lex fenwick **Gayatri Devi & Thomas Woltz *

Jerry Gorvey, Karen marta, Jennifer blei stockman, David stockman, michael Gabellini, & nancy spector **

heather Kirby, rory riggs, & Larry remmel **

John currin, rachel feinstein, Douglas cramer, &hugh bush *

Janice Gardner cecil, michèle Gerber Klein, & michele oka Doner **

* photos by patrick mcmullan ** photos by hal horowitz

11 BomB 112

LeaDers$40,000 and over

cary brown epstein & steven epsteinnational endowment for the arts

sponsors $20,000 to $39,999

new york city Department of cultural affairsnew york state council on the artsThe Thanksgiving fundandy Warhol arts Writing initiative

Donors $10,000 to $19,999

bloomberg frances r. Dittmer family foundationmichele oka Donerfundación cisneros, colección patricia phelps de cisnerosGagosian Galleryhorace W. Goldsmith foundationfundación/ colección Jumex heather m. Kirbybertha & isaac Liberman foundationDorothy LichtensteinJerry i. speyer

pubLisher’s circLe$5,000 to $9,999

The W. L. Lyons brown, Jr. charitable foundationhelaine & paul cantorbarbara Gladstonemarian Goodman GalleryJames r. hedgesLief D. rosenblattmay & samuel rudin family foundation, inc.Jennifer & David stockman pubLisher’s counciL$2,500 to $4,999 chatham importers, inc.hugh bush & Douglas s. cramer empire merchantsGiuliana bruno & andrew fierbergsteven m. hollJill & peter Krauschristina Weiss Lurieamy & John phelanmarla prather mimi Thompson & James rosenquistalexander s.c. rowerellen phelan & Joel shapirosue scott & mike stanleyselect equity Groupmadeline Weinrib

paTrons$1,000 to $2,499

anonymousroland augustine & Lawrence Luhring mahnaz ispahani & adam bartosJill bernsteinDiana betteridgeKarin Waisman & carlos brillembourgpriscilla caldwellrosemary carrollJoanne Leonhardt cassulloJanice Gardner cecilJane & James cohan

andrew cullinanJennifer clifford Danner & bill Dannerpatricia phelps de cisnerospat steir & Joost elfersLisa Dennisonelizabeh eastonstacy engmanfoundation for contemporary artshirley Kaneda & Joe fyfeagnes Gundsandy hellerJennifer coates & David humphreyKaplowitz family foundationnicole KlagsbrunJosé Kuri, Kurimanzuttoursula & paul Lowerresylvia plimack mangold & robert mangoldGregory r. millerJan hashey & yasuo minagawa Lorea canales & Dave morganToshiko moriedward T. nahemThe new york community Trust —The randy slifka philanthropic fundDore hammond & Jim normilepannonia foundationnancy Delman portnoyclifford rossKathy T. ruttenbergpamela sandersalanna heiss & frederick shermansikkema Jenkins & co.rebecca van de sande

benefacTors$500 to $999

anonymouscarolyn alexanderross blecknerDianne blellJean pagliuso & Tom cohenfrayda & ronald feldmanshelley & vincent fremontGreene naftali Gallerysusan & steven Jacobsonsusan & Glenn Lowryilana maoz & michael matzcoleen fitzgibbon & Tom otternessWilliam r. peelle, Jr.Jane rosenblummr. & mrs. andrew saulann & mel schafferarlene J. shechetDiana Leydon & philip susslerKate & bernard TschumiThomas Woltz

frienDs$250 to $499

elizabeth c. bakermr. & mrs. francesco bonamiLinda blumbergelizabeth a. boehmlerJenny hankowitz & Gregory bottspablo castroWard cunningham-rundlesGabriella De ferrarirobert s. engmanDavid GoerkJennifer Lyn GreeneDeborah Kassphilae m. Knightsuydam LansingLavender may LLc

elizabeth LecompteJulian Lethbridgefrances LevineJudith Linharesanthony mccallfrancine hunter mcGivernscott nussbaumJane roseandrea rosenDonna perret rosenamy sandbackJoyce pomeroy schwartzcindy shermancarolee Theayvonne force villarealhelen Warwicksusan Wheeler

paLs$100 to $249

michele abramowitzrichard armstrongcecily hortonLucy & irving sandlerDavid stack

bomb prinT cLub

The following artists generously donated their talent to the bomb print club.

steve Dibenedetto Joanne Greenbaum sharon harper oliver herring iñigo manglano-ovalle paul pfeiffer brian Tolle

To purchase a print or become a member of the bomb print club, please contact mary-ann monforton at 718-636-9100 x105.

bomb GaLa bomb extends heartfelt thanks to the artists who generously donated work to bomb’s 29th anniversary silent auction and Gala benefit, 2010:

Diana al-hadidamy cohen bankerTina barneyÁlvaro barriosvalérie belinGuy ben-nersheila bergerJimbo blachlyDike blairantonio caromichelle charlessteven charlesmichael combsJessica craig-martincarlos cruz-Diezshoshana Dentzharry Dodgecheryl Doneganrikki Ducornetmitch epsteinfranklin evanssolange fabiãorob fischerclaire fontaine

allen frameJoe fyfemike Gliernan GoldinDulce GómezDeborah Grantsharon harperscott healyGeorge hermsalex hubbardJoan JonasDavid Kappalex Katzfernanda LagunaLluis Lleóeva Lundsagervera Luttermatt maddenGuy maddinJoanna malinowskaesperanza mayobremichael mcclardamanda meansJulie mehretuGeorge mead moorecarlos mottacarrie moyerGeorge negroponteThomas nozkowskiroxy paineLuis molina-pantinLamar petersonr.h. Quaytmaneileen QuinlanLesley raesideJason reppertpedro reyesallen ruppersbergLynn savilleDread scottrichard serraJoel shapiroamy sillmanLaurie simmonsxaviera simmonsadam simonmichael smithKeith sonniercharline von heylcarrie mae Weemsmadeline Weinrib

Join, DonaTe,subscribe aT bombsiTe.com

tHank you to all 2010 BomB Patrons

BOMB 11238

ComfoRtable seats, 2008, perfOrMance View, British fiLM institute, LOnDOn. phOtO By BryOny Mcintyre. aLL iMages cOurtesy Of the artist.

vaRieties of slow, 2008, perfOrMance View, whitney MuseuM Of aMerican art. phOtO By hOwarD yang.

big mistake, 2009, perfOrMance View, center fOr cOnteMpOrary art, gLasgOw. phOtO By BryOny Mcintyre.

39

anDrew LaMpert by ed halterWhen Andrew Lampert performs his new piece Jacka Spades, he sits somewhere close to the front of a theater, operating a Super-8 projector in plain view of the audi-ence. While the screen remains dark, an audio recording plays in which Lampert and the gravelly-voiced Steve Dalachinsky walk and talk on the streets of downtown Manhattan. Lampert asks him what he should shoot; in their chaotic back-and-forth patter, verging on an im-promptu Borscht-Belt act, there’s a bit of confusion as to who’s in charge. Lampert keeps insisting that he’s just the cinematographer and the other guy is the artist, but the would-be director doesn’t seem to know what he wants. “I’m not the guy making the movie,” Lampert protests. “I’m just shooting your movie.” When we hear Lampert’s companion tell him to film, say, for instance, a street sign, Lampert turns on the projector and screens what was shot at that time, and the recorded sound of his camera’s motor overlaps with the live sound of the projector running. Throughout the performance, Lampert starts and stops the reel, correlating the im-ages with the soundtrack in approximate real time. Three minutes of footage spread out over roughly a half-hour of audio, illuminating the theater in brief intervals that momentarily sync the present with the past.

In addition to his work as an artist, Lampert is the resident archivist at Anthology Film Archives, but his performances, films, and audio pieces bear none of the librarianlike stuffiness usually associated with the latter profession—in fact, much of his art seems to be about undermining any assumed reverence for the preservation of media artifacts. “The projector and the screen and the projectionist and the audience are together far more integral to cinema than any film run-ning through a projector in a booth behind the audi-ence,” he writes in a short statement on his practice. “Celluloid is not cinema, not even close.” For Lampert, cinema is what happens right now, and he loves to tan-gle the lines between the documented and the live. As in Jacka Spades, he frequently creates a set of rules al-lowing for improvisation and chance operations. In the 2009 piece Home, he provides off-the-cuff narration to Super-8 films shot when he was a teenager—re-enacting the way home movies were once shown in living rooms before the advent of video. He performed Jutting (for Will Rose) by proxy in 2009 by instructing the British

curator William Rose to execute his orders through a written letter and an audio CD played in the Riverside Gallery in Leeds. For Varieties of Slow, a multi-projector 16-mm piece staged for the duration of a month dur-ing the 2006 Whitney Biennial, Lampert left directions for the museum staff and other participants to change lenses, add gels, play music, and rearrange the set-up according to a detailed calendar of events; sometimes Lampert was there, but mostly not. “Periodic requests and new directions might be sent via email, fax, or tele-phone,” one version of his instructions reads. “While it isn’t urgent to drop everything, it would be appreciated if the alteration is made as soon as you can get to it.” Perhaps his work as an archivist has made him think about how an artwork functions in the absence of its art-ist, in the hands of other caretakers. For Double Benetton he printed found footage from a mid-’90s fashion shoot, originally color, in superimposition onto black and white reversal 16-mm film—the last bits of that recently dis-continued stock he could find. He imagined, he’s said, that in the future someone might find this film, won-der why it was reprinted that way, “and be confused.” —Ed Halter is writer, curator, and co-founder of

Light Industry, a venue for film and electronic art in Brooklyn.

stiLL frOM Double benetton, 2008, 16-MM fiLM. tOtaL running tiMe: 5 Minutes.

artists On artists / anDrew LaMpert

BOMB 112

Cynthia hOpkins by annie-B parson

42

I saw Cynthia Hopkins’s work for the first time in 1999; she was performing with her band Gloria Deluxe. As lead singer, she began by telling an obviously apocry-phal story about her sister (she doesn’t have one) and how they were in a traveling tent show. She followed this with a few songs and told a bit more of this excessive story. Then she sang a few more of her great songs and continued to unravel this impossible biography. She was wearing a character very lightly, almost as if it would be too exposing to be on stage just singing. Was this the inception of the elaborate fictions that she later made into theater pieces?

Part Bob Dylan, part Louise Brooks, Hopkins trained as an actor and a musician, and both disciplines prevail in her work. She is never still on stage except to strap on her accordion or to sit at her piano, but at times even her piano moves around with her. She devises the-ater as a way to construct an imaginary, complicated, and very musical world that serves to chase away her devils. Video comes and goes, wrapping us around cor-ners and doorways and alleys of images. And she might remind you of another Cindy as she tries on personas as disparate as an old Korean sage and an astronaut.

Her narratives seem purposefully hyperfictional, certainly beyond anything we could believe or follow. This elaborateness might serve as a rebuke to the dom-inance of so-called believable narrative in theater, or maybe she is just trying to hide inside a byzantine maze of fictions. Whatever her mysterious motivations, she holds her audience spellbound, as in the great tradition of the old time raconteurs.

With her collaborators Jeff Sugg, DJ Mendel, and Jim Findlay, in 2001 she embarked on Accidental Trilogy, a groundbreaking music/theater trilogy that spans eight years of work and many hours of finely wrought perfor-mance. In its three parts—Accidental Nostalgia, Must Don’t Whip ’Um, and The Success of Failure (or, the Failure of Success)—she tells a crazily intricate yarn that wraps her, Cynthia, in a deep fiction and then spins and spits her out in the end to tell the real story of the moth-er she lost, the addictions she battles, and her roads to psychic survival.

Hopkins is often hard to discern up there on stage with her penchant for facing away from the audience, obstructed by objects and masks, scarves, mustaches, hats, noses. Personas and head wraps and wigs and glasses mitigate her face and head; layers and layers of clothes hide her small body. As you watch, it becomes increasingly apparent that she is successfully hiding in the spotlight, a fascinating contradiction. And then, at last, at the very end of an entire trilogy, there she is with her angelic face and clear, childlike voice. She suddenly has stripped off all the masking devices, to just jeans and a T-shirt, and she is playing the acoustic guitar and singing with no mic, and she has unwrapped all the crazy narratives to show us that she is Cynthia, a woman who

Cynthia hOpkins in Must Don’t Whip ‘uM. phOtO By pavel antOnOv.

43 theater / Cynthia hOpkins

wants to tell her own story straight out, and this story is true and honest and hard to hear, and she is generous, and we are grateful.

In early spring we met for breakfast and talked about The Truth: A Tragedy, the new work that she was about to open at Soho Rep. We talk fairly often, usually in the morning, but this was the first time we had a re-corder on my kitchen table.

—Annie-B Parson

AnnIe-B PARSon: I got excited because I’ve never interviewed anybody, really. I created a series of un-related questions, in the same way we would make a dance with random materials that, at a later date, we’d craft into something woven together.

CynTHIA HoPKInS: It’s already about 10,000 times more interesting than interviews usually are.

ABP: I’ll just roll the dice and choose a question from my list to start with.

CH: It’s a chance operation. Have you ever seen the dice collection of the Museum of Jurassic Technology?

ABP: no; when we, Big Dance Theater, were in LA they wouldn’t let us out of our cage.

CH: you have to go when you’re in LA again. It’s based on some of the earliest museums in this country, before there was a clear demarcation between, say, a

science, anthropology, or art museum. you see works of theater, science, fiction—elements of truth as well as outrageous fictional invention, all at once.

ABP: That makes me wonder if when you make your work you are trying to separate fact from fiction in any way?

CH: no, I’m trying to do the opposite. Weave them together and make some new form which is its own beast.

ABP: okay, let’s roll the dice.CH: The last time I was at the museum there was

a collection of dice from Ricky Jay, a new york magi-cian, on display. There were all kinds: ancient dice, dice with fur. The museum is like a maze that sucks you in: its walls are dark, its ceilings low, it has all these little rooms and hallways. There’ll be something like a little exhibit of a rain forest inside a glass case, which you’ll be able to see only partially. I discovered the museum through this great book by Lawrence Weschler: Mr. Wilson’s Cabinet of Wonder.

ABP: This mixing of fact and fiction sounds like your work

CH: yes. My most recent work, The Truth: A Tragedy, which was up this past May at Soho Rep, has a component in the vein of the cabinet of curiosities influenced by the Museum of Jurassic Technology—it is made up of detritus from my father’s life, and it

Cynthia hOpkins in the success of failure (or, the failure of success). phOtO By paula COurt.

fIRST PROOf12

dANIELLE dUTTONfIcTION fOR dRIvINg AcROSS AMERIcA: fROM sprAwlLISTEN TO A POdcAST Of dANIELLE dUTTON REAdINg ThIS ExcERPT AT BOMBSITE.cOM

I walk through streets and look in win-dows to witness cheerfully painted walls and vertical lamps, high technical quality and surround-sound, mystery, beauty, fry baskets, fried chicken legs, joy sticks, shelves, ovens, beans. Over and over I en-counter specific signs, such as prepare to merge. I stand in front of one public mural entitled “The Evolution of Dishes.” But a blue heron flies over my car and then just disappears. I carry on for weeks after this. I squeeze oranges into paper cups for vitamins. I cluster near the base of bedside lamps. It’s like I can’t rest con-fident in the political circumstance of one small space, this one, or right outside the window, or across the street, or over by the train station. As if I’m delicate. As if I’m deserted. As if I’m an endangered oce-lot or a farmer on a stamp. As if I identify randomly with people on the street. As if I’m named Yvonne or Yvette. As if I have a bright pink refrigerator. As if I’m ex-hausted or superstitious or aggressively sexualized and armed with an assortment of lasers or guns. I don’t feel a thing. In the morning, over coffee and eggs, I’m exhorted to be an individual. In the after-noon we wash our cars. At night I’m re-stricted to a relatively confined social circle. The cat climbs in and out of empty boxes in the hall. I sleep with the window open and imagine. Tonight a celebrity on television mentions his wife and kids. He tells the camera he spent last year riding a motorcycle around the world. His favor-ite color is purple and his card is American Express. Tonight I deny my ordinary life. I converse with the very words. I impress myself on men’s hands as I make my way toward the restrooms at the back. I drop my dress on the floor. I chop produce. I pick weeds. I pop a plastic bag for no real

reason. I take advantage of particular events, of particular sentiments, to render a particular series of events. I become de-tached from the routine of lawn, lawn, office building, lawn or “Bring me milk,” “Bring me sugar.” I say, “Milk me sugar” and “Sugar me milk.” I move through the house and let my kimono slip open, a soaring kimono with silvery cranes and blossoms. I get the mail in my open ki-mono and meet the neighbors’ stares with my own absence. There are bills and cata-logs for garden furniture and candles. There is a letter written as a kind of crazy joke, it’s a sort of contest, a contest. It’s easily stirred. I leave the bowl on the counter and the bugs find it. “You’re filthy,” it says. It amounts to nothing. The season, as it progresses, becomes un-col-lective and un-plural. I acquire a certain understanding with the abandoned swim-ming pool in the park. It contains a dis-tinctive temperature, a soft molecular surge. In bed I can feel it (strange night-time rhythms). In the morning a pebble sinks (pebbles and crows). Meanwhile, the evening news is a whole nightmare of the future involving underground labora-tories and weather. What is buried in our thoughts is self-evolving. Out there is a continuity of something; it is secretly al-lowed to cross borders and nations. The book in my hands says, “You wouldn’t like to live on a coral reef but sometimes you would.” I cool my face against the beveled edge of the glass table in the liv-ing room. I stand on the table and look out the window. I bruise my leg on the glass edge. So I carry my work into an-other room where there are decadent lamps and signs of Egyptology as a hobby. Apparently, we are vulgar populizers of the superficial. Sometimes we don’t even know it’s happening. Other times I feel it rise up in my throat like a genteel wrath. Haywood’s flapping smile is wholly inno-cent. And what’s left? What one might wonder is: is this fast trip through my own little strip of time my own? Am I on it? One day someone will decode intri-cately wrapped gifts on the far limits of the tabletop: glass grapes, bunches of plas-tic marigolds, a blue plate, a white plate, a heaping pile of fallen petals. In the mov-ie of my life I’ll play myself, from a distinct past, or a gliding distance, in the garden, under a stone bench, or from the leaves like a watchtower. It’s enjoyable

—the rising and falling of large ideas we play off against our bodies. Like that thing there, can I put it in my up or down? There are breakfast plates, a fork, a knife, a chunk of bread, paper napkins, a ba-nana sliced in half and standing on end. Later, on the same table, there’s a choco-late bar wrapped in blue-and-silver foil, a pear. I stand in my house. I collaborate with the window and fill it optimistically with my figure or silhouette, which is somewhat rewarding. Other days I am ragged and gross. I move into the night and arrive at stones. Then I move south-ward through an idealized artif icial system. I attempt to single-handedly rein-vigorate the relationship between people and place. I shake myself on the sidewalk like a dog. I am prominent and astounding, but everyone else is asleep. I stand in the light from lampposts and point at revivals of traditional architec-ture, landscape scenarios, bifurcations of community, etc. All the houses have at least one door. The initial idea wasn’t ours, but we’ve incorporated it totally. When I get home Haywood is in bed. There is a pain in his chest and he does not choose to perform for me. I eat cake and stand in front of the window in the kitchen. There is something in the back-yard, in the dark, so I go outside and squat in the grass, but whatever it is runs away from me. In the morning we go back to the kitchen to eat breakfast. First, one person gets up and goes into the bath-room. Then someone else showers in the bathroom after dinner. In this way, each moment corresponds to a different room. On the evening news they show clips from the nation’s largest machine-gun show. There are vendors selling automatic weapons with mass-market appeal and teenage boys in camouflage spraying bul-lets at an old Cadillac. Families walk by the camera smiling and waving and eat-ing chunks of meat or corn. There are baseball hats and ski-caps and ponytails that sway and look soft. Then the reporter interviews a man with a metal cashbox and a rif le over his shoulder. Later Haywood and I sit in a swing and look out at all our grass. A bird sings at us from his perch in the tree, but the nests he builds will fall into the pool when it rains. There are all sorts of flowers in the hedg-es: edible, highly scented and purple, and red clogs for gardening. If stitched

A heard number of indications intelligently communicated.

13 dANIELLE dUTTON

together, the lawns on this street would be pointless and unrecognizable. Three houses down, one hostess serves cham-pagne and eggs. She carries cupcakes on small trays and the wallpaper in her kitch-en is a repetitious pattern of carrots and peas. I keep trying to lie down on all her furniture. Around midnight Haywood and I lock our door with a bolt. We have the right to choose which bodies will en-ter this special community and which bodies will be denied entrance. For ex-ample, there are carefully maintained ar-eas devoted to leisure, areas that measure more than five feet across and that are bounded by special functions. But that’s just it. Sometimes it seems this place is an assortment of ordinary, illiterate people who grew up eating crops. Sometimes we root ourselves in limitations that seem relatively straightforward. The main dif-ference is that if you never leave you are always already here. Sometimes it’s ex-hausting, or sometimes it’s straightfor-ward in a blank way, like fear. Meanwhile, Haywood is poised between one great idea and one general. I feel his frustration like the brainless grace of a goose capsiz-ing. Then again, it’s as if he admires how I sit in the dark in the midst of my fail-ures. He wants me to. But I sit on the porch under an abstract specimen of sky, stretched out. I continue reading: “‘Good God’ she cried, ‘the violets down below!’” What he finally decides is that what we have is a kind of awkwardness worth sav-ing. His systematic attempts to be a hus-band are my instructions for the next few hours. We move behind the couch where he presses his fingers against my neck. He puts his toes in my vagina. “Good God,” I cry. I lean against the wall. My face is probably magnificent. My cunt in the moonlight. Afterward, we eat pasta with cream and only use one bowl. Haywood leaves his shoes on the kitchen floor. He showers downstairs. I stand in the living room in front of the open window. The sidewalk grows bigger and bigger. I see it reaching up through the window, grow-ing bigger in the moonlight. “How do I

look?” it asks. We could take a train to-gether and disappear in the city outside. It’s impossible; it lies outside the envelope of my own special case. So in a little while I lose my head on the sidewalk, in the lamplight. An owl plunges from the branches toward the asphalt and via a se-ries of similar accidents I lose my head. The following week there is a document-ed sexual encounter on that very sidewalk. Two people embrace in full daytime view of a wide range of neighbors. These are people we know, but do not know. So I step away from the window and breeze past a lot of furniture. I breeze past a table in the corner covered with knick-knacks. I return Haywood’s shoes to their appro-priate spot. I straighten one framed pho-tograph on the wall and place a pitcher of water, several kiwis, and a dozen or so blue petals on the edge of a different table in a completely different room. Then I sit down and push the tablecloth away from me, about two feet away, and wipe the surface with a wet yellow sponge. For lunch I eat several olives, a quail, three loaves of bread, and a sausage, and then I read through old letters in full view of the city, or in the garage. My views move to another room, always different, some-times, or individual, a pull of some his-tory (tonight the presence of a storm). But the letters carry on, hoping to probe our smoothed-out sense of self. They augment an unstatic perception. I watch the city through the gaps in trees. The city is an actualizing background for all kinds of arbitrary treatments. On the edge of my view is a communication, a light, a quick boom. I pretend to be increasingly deaf—in this way I put Haywood in a little book in the dark. I can’t pass it. I can’t possess it. I defeat myself in an afternoon, so I stalk monarchs across the lawn with a net. One kid says, “Happy birthday!” Another kid says, “Trick or treat.” The social-his-torical importance of this place is tenu-ous, and thus, necessarily, has a clear and definite aim. I produce documentary ob-jects: Historical Varieties (i.e., Verities), apple pies, sexual feelings. Seen from

above, there is a peculiar pattern to our expansion: neighborhoods snake around supermarkets, hospitals, airports, malls. It’s wanting to not be left behind. Houses shimmer together with the weather. There’s a kind of earthy gravity to the weather. I uncover this fact by accidental research. I figure I might have an internal architecture, with buttresses, abundance, possibility, or an intestinal space in which nothing works the way it should, like buildings built on botanical models, or buildings based on your own dna, or whole rooms built to laugh in, or sticky gardens with the usual material but brighter, or more dull. On the kitchen counter are faded lily stems, white-faded, translucent in water, and tipped over, with yellow-orange spores streaking the cabi-net to the floor. Nothing I do can deceive; the curtain is rendered convincingly in re-lation to the stereo with its red blinking lights, the heavy desk, the rug and couch. It’s all in the eye, the beauty of the sub-urbs, its sharp, whitish light, the lack of logical relationships; it’s been written about in local circles or schools. It’s a cor-ner of nature demonstrated by bulldozers, machines, tractors, etc. It’s been recorded on accident, on film or video to preserve the years, the human marks, signs of light and air, an intuitive kind of creativity. Meanwhile, Haywood is undergoing sub-tle changes. He mumbles quietly in unknown parts of rooms. I watch from shrubs. I stand in front of the washing machine and eat a blood orange off a small white plate. I leave the plate and the peel on the edge of the counter and drink water from a tumbler and wipe my hands on my pants. Then I take the warm laun-dry out of the dryer and carry it into the living room. This is a program inaugu-rated over a century ago and handed down, which may help to account for its differences from other work that it resem-bles. These are private routines not visible in census data. I locate my body by grounding it against the bodies of others. I am interested in knowing about all the possible thresholds. Walking through the mall there is a scene in which a woman in red leans forward to hand an item of pur-chase to a man in a brown coat who stands behind a table covered in folded sweaters of various colors and wicker baskets filled with rolled silk ties under which a small child sticks his hand into a plastic bag

AN OwL PLUNgES fROM ThE BRANchES TOwARd ThE ASPhALT ANd vIA A SERIES Of SIMILAR AccIdENTS I LOSE MY hEAd. ThE fOLLOwINg wEEK ThERE IS A dOcUMENTEd SExUAL ENcOUNTER ON ThAT vERY SIdEwALK. TwO PEOPLE EMBRAcE IN fULL dAYTIME vIEw Of A wIdE RANgE Of NEIghBORS. ThESE ARE PEOPLE wE KNOw, BUT dO NOT KNOw. SO I STEP AwAY fROM ThE wINdOw ANd BREEzE PAST A LOT Of fURNITURE.

Infants. Pursuing them. Evokes our treatment of intoned structure.

fIRST PROOf28

hAArlems stArry night, 2010, AcRYLIc ANd INK ON gELATIN SILvER PRINT, 13 × 8.9 INchES.

SEBASTIAAN BREMER29

invAsões holAndesAs, 2009, INK ON LAMdA PRINT, 46 × 45.5 INchES.

Read an interview with Sebastiaan Bremer by Shoshana Dentz at BOMBsite.com.

BOMB 11258

Lines in the sand, 2002, perfOrMance view, DOcuMenta 11, Kassel. phOtO By werner MaschMann.

the shape, the scent, the FeeL oF things, 2005, perfOrMance view, Dia:BeacOn, new yOrK. phOtO By paula cOurt.

organic honey’s VisuaL teLepathy, 1973, perfOrMance view, Musée galliera, paris. phOtO By Beatrice heiligers.

59 art / JOan JOnas

This past spring Joan Jonas’s Mirage was on view at MoMA, her Reading Dante III at Yvon Lambert Gallery, and Drawing/Performance/Video at Location One in SoHo. In this interview, I investigate with Joan the significance of her performances and installations by stressing her ideas-in-form. What kind of form: mod-ernist poetry.

Jonas’s language gives us a fertile semiological value to reflect upon. It has an organic open-work struc-ture of experimentation that necessitates play along with a system of signs. Its mythology offers a visual image of a new Gestalt. In the formation of this new Gestalt, constructed from fragmented parts of the old one, Jonas dismembers the beholder’s experience of his/her rela-tionship with the work. We become responsible for the production of the work’s meaning through a plurality of entrances and experiences, actively participating in its birth. The physical, parallel realities of this unfamiliar game embody a free play between the artist/writer/per-former and the beholder/reader/participator wherein we encounter ourselves as a “subject-in-process.”

Jonas extracts a sub-language from her readings of (non)chance encounters with texts—from fairy tales to The Divine Comedy—creating physical experiences with her (in)visible sentences that acquire a body pro-duced by multiple threads: minimal gestures, a careful reading/writing/behaving of texts, organic hide-and-seek drawings, dilatory sounds, floating lights, handmade objects, snaking continuous movements, acoustic images, and lumen drawings in dark rooms. Although we are still (un)consciously negotiating the return of the repressed in the formation of language, in this meta-art there is the possibility of re-investing in our experience of the a/object. In this productive labor between artist/participator and production/consumption, a free-willing sign blurs and discharges language into a fresh signi-fication. The base of the experience relies on negative utterance; Jonas frees us from cultural associations without arriving at any definitive closure that might re-duce its signification.

—Karin Schneider

KArIn ScHneIder: In your current exhibition at Location One, there are six monitors showing your video. Pieces made in the ’70s, ’80s, and ’90s; one

JOan JOnas by Karin schneider

LeFt side , right side, 1972, viDeO, tOtal running tiMe: 7 Minutes. all iMages cOurtesy Of the artist anD yvOn laMBert gallery paris, new yOrK.

68 BOMB 112

PhOtO By tOM hines.

edward drOste by rick Moody

Music / edward drOste69

I had a conversion experience with Grizzly Bear, one having to do with their single “While You Wait for the Others,” which unexpectedly features a version with lead vocals by none other than Michael McDonald—former Doobie Brother and soul legend. I’d heard their 2006 album Yellow House in passing and had taken note of last year’s Veckatimest upon its release, but I’d missed, as one does sometimes, all the nuance, all the subtlety, until I heard McDonald doing his soul thing while the four voices of Grizzly Bear took up the descant choir behind him. A sudden obsession followed near there-upon, and I went back to find Yellow House ludicrously grand in its ambition and that Veckatimest solidified the confidence of that earlier effort and added strings and chorus here and there, as well as new production clarity and more electric guitar, all of it indicating to me how rewardingly far “indie rock” had come since the days of Pavement’s Slanted and Enchanted. Maybe Horn of Plenty, the first Grizzly Bear album, had a little of the off-kilter slacker charm of indie rock, especially since it is mainly an Edward Droste solo project, but by the advent of Veckatimest, all was picture-perfect arrange-ment, writing, and ensemble playing. Thus: I was, as an example of the recently converted and fully appreciative, excited to interview Droste, lead singer and one of the two principal writers in the band even more so when I learned that he’d also been a creative-writing student at NYU after leaving Hampshire College. Our conversation took place at an Italian joint in Greenpoint, the neighbor-hood whose latitudes include Droste’s residence. He is taller than you’d think, easy to talk to, full of enthusiasms and wonder at the strangeness of the world, and not at all preoccupied with the music business. He’s just a creative and, to use the word that comes up often here, intuitive guy. I think we could have talked another couple of hours without any difficulty. —Rick Moody

RICk MOODY: Could you start by explaining what hap-pened at Hampshire College that made you leave after a year? What went wrong?

EDWARD DROsTE: I took a year off after high school and did the classic “see the world” thing. I don’t know what I’d be doing now if not for that year. I did an art program in Italy and Greece. I lived with a fam-ily in Zimbabwe doing community service. I did some backpacking. By the time I got to Hampshire after a full 12 months, it felt like a small, irritating environment. I remember a guy on my floor who would always play didgeridoo in such a way so that you had to step over him and his didgeridoo to get to the communal bath-room. He’d look at you longingly, waiting to be asked, “What is that?” or told, “I can’t believe you play the didgeridoo!” I was extremely depressed there.

RM: Because it was so small?ED: It felt remote and isolating. Developmentally

I was dealing with some personal stuff, like coming out of the closet, so it was a transitional period.

RM: You also studied writing at NYU.ED: I went to Gallatin, where every class is based

on a canon of literature.RM: You had to know your Aristotle?ED: Yeah, of course. My memory will fail if you

were to quote any to me. (laughter) And I got to do cre-ative writing there.

RM: The writing, that’s part of what I really wanted to talk about. Was it fiction writing?

ED: No, mostly creative nonfiction. I don’t even do it anymore. When I was in school, I thought it would be great to write for The New Yorker or the Paris Review.

RM: Can you give an example of your kind of cre-ative nonfiction?

ED: They were on the personal essay tip. Generally true, though not always completely. I never had the chance to write in any professional sense. Do you only write fiction?

RM: I’ve done both. I once published a memoir, and these days I’m mostly writing music essays, actually. But enough about me. Did the NYU years include the famous moment when your mom said, “Take that guitar back to your dorm room and get it out of the house”?

ED: Basically. But I didn’t start writing music un-til after college. I wrote some God-awful stuff in high school; glad there are no recordings of that.

RM: Your mother teaches music and your grandfa-ther ran the music department at Harvard. so there was a lot of music around when you were growing up.

ED: I had a great relationship with music, with that weird Brahmin WAsP accent, which my grandfather had, by the way. The stuff I was surrounded with was Benjamin Britten and Randall Thompson—that’s what my grandfather listened to. Also classic vocal jazz.

RM: Ella Fitzgerald?ED: Yeah. Louis Armstrong. “A-Tisket, A-Tasket.”

My grandfather was very into us gathering around a piano and singing. Before dinner, after dinner, gather ’round! I remember friends being mildly mystified by the weird olden-day style of togetherness.

My parents generally listened to classical and cho-ral music, but could even get into Crystal Gayle-like stuff. But everyone around me had Thriller. We were no ex-ception to that rule. The second you start having tastes as a kid they’re generally kid tastes: my first concerts were Madonna’s Blond Ambition tour, Janet Jackson’s Rhythm Nation tour (laughter), U2’s Achtung Baby, what-ever was on the radio. Then in eighth or ninth grade I discovered Pavement, Liz Phair, and Jeff Buckley. The discovery of my own taste.

RM: In the time of liking Pavement, did you repu-diate things like Benjamin Britten?

ED: You know what? I think I had completely for-gotten about it. My bandmates brought me back to that

BOMB 11282

In early 2003 I lived on the same street as Jennifer Egan, and, knowing her not really at all, but admiring her a lot, I’d mailed my second book to her house, praying she’d feel some vague neighborliness toward me and donate, to my sorry cause, a blurb. A writer always suspects (be-cause it is true) that she is deeply inconveniencing, even temporarily ruining, the life of another writer when she asks for a blurb. To my mortification, I learned that the writer of whom I’d requested this favor had just given birth to a baby.

A few days later I ran into Egan with her just-home-from-the-hospital baby. Before I could offer con-gratulations, she blurted out, “I’m so sorry I haven’t had a chance to read your book yet!”

Egan’s niceness isn’t the crucial take-away from this anecdote, at least if you’re trying to meaningfully connect Jenny Egan the Person with Jennifer Egan the Writer. The take-away should be this: both Egans are unceasingly and penetratingly curious about the head-spaces of others.

To call this impulse empathy, however, is to shear it of its prickly intellectual component. Egan is a super-thinky writer in quasi-disguise, a writer who alchemizes Big Ideas into works of emotional intensity and architec-tural intricacy, the result being sneaky books you can recommend to those friends and relatives who demand “recognizable” characters and thumping storylines, but whom you hope might find tantalizing, beneath these vibrant entertainments, the buzzing circuitry of Egan’s mighty brain.

While beginning her career as an ambivalent realist—with her first collection of stories, Emerald City, and her first novel, The Invisible Circus—Egan started breeding her realist ambitions with more postmodern ones. The first result of this textual test-tubery was Look at Me, a semi-satirical critique of the cultural obsession with image and beauty explored through the parallel narratives of two females named Charlotte—one a model in Manhattan, one a teenager in Illinois—unknowingly connected via a man named Z. The Keep, a spooky gothic-inspired castle novel built from multiple levels of storytelling and fictionality, was that much more “out” as a novel with more than the usual realist aims.

But I must admit that, adore these earlier Egan books though I did, nothing quite prepared me for the degree of flat-out-flooredness I’d experience (this floor was in a Mexican hotel room) while reading her latest book, A Visit from the Goon Squad. Goon Squad defies the who-when-where-why perimeters of jacket copy so completely that any attempt at summation will prove a laughable stab. However. The book follows a group of interconnected characters. Possibly Sasha, a touchingly troubled soul, and her boss, Bennie Salazar, a famous music producer, reside at the center of the plot vortex (but this statement is highly debatable). Each chapter is told from a different character’s POV, though each

jennifer egan by Heidi julavits

PHOtO By Pieter M. Van HatteM/Vistalux.

83 literature / jennifer egan

one “recurs” (earlier or later in the book) as a support-ing cast member. The book zooms around in time, but defies linearity so completely that I stopped envision-ing time as the proverbial arrow on which I dutifully hopped pointward or tailward. In Goon Squad, time is deep, and Egan the literary equivalent of a paleoclima-tologist drilling through layers of ice. Each chapter is like an ice core sample and the book, thus, functions more on an ice core timeline, better understood vertically than horizontally. It establishes, without question, that she is one of the most significant living practitioners of the art we call fiction.

While Egan tends not to write directly from per-sonal experience, a chapter in Goon Squad takes place in San Francisco, her hometown, around the time when Egan herself was in high school, and, depending on who you believe, hanging out with a punk-loving music crowd much like the one described in her book.

—Heidi Julavits

HEIdI JulAVITS: So, my spies informed me that you were a “real” punk in high school.

JEnnIFEr EgAn: I was not a punk in high school. (Ahem, who are these spies?) Except for blonder hair and no wrinkles, I have never looked much different than I do now. I did go to concerts at the Mabuhay gardens, but always as a wannabe observer. The good news is I didn’t end up shooting heroin with communal needles, as many punks did in the late ’70s, just before AIdS was discovered.

HJ: given how different your early work is from your more recent work, are there anxieties you had when you first started writing that no longer preoccupy you? do you have new anxieties now?

JE: My biggest concern at the beginning was just being understood in a way that, looking back, seems very neurotic. I literally felt as if no one would under-stand what I was saying, even though I was writing a totally conventional novel. As usual, I had certain theo-retical questions I wanted to explore in my first novel: I was interested in how the new mass media interact-ed with the ’60s counterculture and heightened its in-tensity, and also in the “out of body” nature of media coverage and the way that might dovetail with a basic human longing for transcendence. I probably hammered those points a little too hard out of a fear of being mis-understood. I was kind of crazy about literary theory in college, I spent way too much time reading texts about texts. More and more I feel you’d better not try and say anything too clearly or too loudly in fiction, because you end up eliminating the mystery that’s at the heart of any great literary experience. I’m also more aware of how I seem to work purely instinctively. For all of my theoriz-ing about culture and the intellectual girding that I hope is in my books, I don’t think a lot about the actual act of writing or the way I’m going to do it. So there’s this

possible overtheorizing in terms of intent but a total lack of theorizing about method.

HJ: But it also seems as if you’re trying to expose or question method, especially in “Safari,” a chapter from A Visit from the Goon Squad that I first read in The New Yorker. A term Zadie Smith used in her awe-some essay “Two Paths for the novel” is “not naïve.” There’s something extremely “not naïve” about “Safari.” It features this really overbearing narrator, as if to say without saying, “look, people, at how lopsided the power dynamic can be in these third-person omniscient so-called realist stories!” Tragically your characters are captives, not of past acts and experiences—from which they could still arguably recover—but of future ones. These flash-forwards are so much more chilling, almost like death sentences—in some cases, that’s literally what they are.

JE: I feel like you understand the story better than I do.

HJ: (laughter)JE: The principles guiding me in terms of method

might seem kind of obvious. With Look at Me, which is more experimental than my first novel, I remember thinking, I’m really tired of the way pages of text look. I wanted mine to look different. I had this feeling of not liking to read a book where you turn these pages and they all look the same. The biggest thing that guides me is a basic attempt to move away from anything that feels familiar.

HJ: Meaning anything that’s too close to your per-sonal experience?

JE: If I’ve read it or done it before, then I’m not in-terested. My aesthetic, or my method, is basically guid-ed by curiosity and desire. Again, there’s nothing very sophisticated about that. There’s no theory there. And I don’t know what the novel should be, but I do know that—well, I was a national Book Award judge last year, and I read some great stuff. But I also found myself thinking that a lot of novels feel really constrained and unaware of the possibilities at hand. I find that curious, because the novel began as this explosion of craziness. I mean, look at Cervantes and Sterne. Two of the first nov-elists. There’s nothing holding them back. They haven’t learned to be afraid to do anything. You do need to be in control, and, in a way, the more chances you’re taking the more you need to control them. But now I feel like the control is coming before the chances. For example, this idea that you can’t change the point of view. What? Why? If you can make it work, you can do anything.

HJ: In the past you’ve written books that were clearly short story collections or clearly novels. How do you categorize Goon Squad, genre-wise, in terms of your own past work? did you start writing it with a category in mind or did that kind of categorizing never influence your thinking?

JE: If I had been telling myself I was writing a

BOMB 11288

My first encounter with Elizabeth Streb was when a friend brought me to a performance at the Joyce Theater in New York and those of us sitting up close were asked to don helmets and goggles as Streb or one of the danc-ers in her group dove through a pane of glass, shattering it into our laps. We were more formally introduced when a mutual friend brought me to Thanksgiving dinner in the apartment Streb shares with her longtime partner, Laura Flanders. The scene was chaotic: Streb stirring huge cauldrons of food over a large industrial-grade stove, Streb chopping vegetables Samurai style, practically hurling knives back and forth to others who seemed familiar with this well choreographed whirl. Flames were jumping too high on the stove, loaves of bread were thrown around the room—time flew past, and within the hour a delicious feast was served at a very long table. It was like an elaborate circus act, a magic show of sorts, filled with lots of pratfalls—physical comedy. At some point there was a trick involving eggs—which broke and landed on the floor. Streb loves a good laugh, a random practical joke, to be surprised, caught off guard. More seriously, Streb is one of the most daring thinkers and performers I have ever known. She’s always expanding the boundaries of what can be done with the body, with physics, with gravity. A cross between Emmett Kelly, Albert Einstein, and Martha Graham, she is inspiring, fluid, and lives to think, deeply and profound-ly, about quite literally what makes the world spin. Her new book, How to Become an Extreme Action Hero, is blazingly articulate, brimming with ideas on space, time, and movement, like Batman and Robin gave her the secret code on how to explain all that happens be-hind KAPOW, SPLAT, and ZOWIE. She is the recipient of a MacArthur Fellowship, and in 2003 she established S.L.A.M. (STREB Lab for Action Mechanics) in Brooklyn, which has an open-door policy; the community is encouraged to watch rehearsals, take classes, and learn to fly. Each week, more than 400 children take classes at Streb’s Brooklyn hub—and “streb” has actually become a verb, used to describe her own brand of “pop action.” As in: W hat are you doing? Strebbing! Ladies and Gentlemen, please welcome America’s first Pop Action Heroine, Elizabeth Streb. —A.M. Homes

A.M. HOMES: You’re described as a choreographer and a dancer, but the philosophical, mathematical, and scien-tific aspects of what you do aren’t really about dance.

ELIZABETH STREB: They’re not, no.AMH: So how do you begin to describe them?ES: It’s difficult to describe motion’s “objectness”

in words. It is interesting to think about how movement gets perceived and to ask, “What is the experience of being a witness to someone who moves?” There’s an integral problem, a lack of serious vocabulary—certainly for dance writers—that tends to cite what your body is

ABOve: Breakthru, 1997, perfOrMed At the JOyce theAter. BelOw: deBOrAh KAss, StreB, 1998, silKscreen And Acrylic On cAnvAs, 81 × 81 inches. cOurtesy Of pAul KAsMin gAllery, new yOrK.

89 dAnce / elizABeth streB

doing, not what’s happening to your body, and therefore, how it affects the audience. For me, the subject is an unnamable thing in terms of what the actual, true func-tion of movement as language could be or what content, motion is capable of holding. Every time you sit down to write, you’ve got to think, How am I going to tell this story in a way that no one’s ever heard before? Similarly, trying to invent action with the body that we inhabit everyday—this hackneyed relationship of body to self and all the embedded clichés lurking there—makes speaking of it even more out of reach than the doing.

Twenty-five years ago I started constructing a series of questions about what I felt to be an unanswered set of principles in the dance world. Time, space, and body forces, when mixed, act as if a chemical explosion has occurred. They could create such extreme move-ments that, as a watcher, you’d be forced to experience it as a paradigm shift. What I try to create and present on stage as “Extreme Action Events” has defaulted into the field of dance because it’s based in movement.

elizABethstreBby A.M. homes

Guy RichaRds smit, The New AdveNTures of GrossmAlermAN, 2010, Gouache and ink on papeR.

96 the wick / Guy RichaRds smit