BLACK & VEATCH6601 College Blvd.Overland Park, KS 66211
Tel: (913) 458-2900
USEPA Region VIIAce Services Site
Mr. Bob StewartUSEPA Region VII901 N. 5th StreetKansas City, Kansas 66101
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
BVSPC Project 044720BVSPC File E. 1.1December 5, 2005
Subject: EPA Contract No. EP-S7-05-06Task Order # 0075Cleanup Status Report # 5
Dear Mr. Stewart:
Enclosed are three copies of Long Term Response Action Cleanup Status Report Number 5. Per yourrequest, I am sending a copy directly to Mr. Leo Henning at KDHE.
Please feel free to call me at (913) 458-6506 if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.
Ken WyattSite Manager
KWW
cc: L. Henning (KDHE)G. Felkner
40227555
^reRFUND RECORDS
1I1Ii
Prepared for:U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 7901 North 5lh StreetKansas City, Kansas 66101
I
1
Long Term Response ActionCleanup Status Report Number 5
April 27, 2005 to October 12, 2005
Ace Services SiteColby, Kansas
December 2, 2005
EPA Contract No.: EP-S7-05-06EPA Task Order No.: 0075
BVSPC Project No.: 044720
I
I
BLACK & VEATCHbuilding a W0rldof difference'-
E N E R G Y W A T E R I N P O R M A T I O N G O V E R N M E N T
Prepared by:Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.6601 College Blvd.Overland Park, Kansas 66211
ProfessionalEnvironmental Engineers. Inc.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Contents
1.0 Introduction 1-1
2.0 Long Term Response Action Objectives 2-12.1 Treatment Goals and Exit Strategy 2-12.2 Performance and Effectiveness 2-1
2.2.1 Groundwater Monitoring 2-22.2.2 Plume Capture 2-22.2.3 Groundwater Treatment System Performance Monitoring 2-42.2.4 Extraction Well Performance 2-4
2.3 System Cost Effectiveness 2-4
3.0 Bibliography 3-1
Tables
Table 2-1 Analytical Results Summary 2-6Table 2-2 Groundwater Elevation Data 2-10Table 2-3 Treatment Goals 2-13Table 2-4 Performance Monitoring Results 2-14
Figures
Figure 1-1 Site Location End of Section 1Figure 2-1 Total Chromium Isoconcentration Contour Map and Groundwater Flow
Direction - Shallow Zone End of Section 2Figure 2-2 Total Chromium Isoconcentration Contour Map and Groundwater Flow
Direction - Intermediate Zone End of Section 2Figure 2-3 Total Chromium Isoconcentration Contour Map and Groundwater Flow
Direction - Deep Zone End of Section 2Figure 2-4 Vertical Groundwater Flow Lines October 2005 End of Section 2Figure 2-5 Shallow Wells (Total Chromium) End of Section 2Figure 2-6 Intermediate Wells (Total Chromium) End of Section 2Figure 2-7 Deep Wells (Total Chromium) End of Section 2Figure 2-8 Residential Wells (Total Chromium) End of Section 2
Ace Services SiteLTRA Cleanup Siatus Report No 5 TC-1 044720
Appendices
Appendix A Water Level Data SheetsAppendix B Well Purging FormsAppendix C Field SheetsAppendix D Chain of Custody RecordsAppendix E AirbillsAppendix F Field LogbooksAppendix G Analytical ResultsAppendix H August 2005 Quarterly Audit Report No. 7Appendix I November 2005 Quarterly Audit Report No. 8
Ace Services SiteLTRA Cleanup Status Report No 5 TC-2 044720
Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Ii
1.0 Introduction
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has initiated remedial action (RA)
efforts for the Ace Services site near Colby, Kansas (CERCLIS I.D. No. KSD046746731). The
RA process is the methodology that the Superfund program has established for remediating risks
posed by uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. Included in the RA efforts are Long Term Response
Action (LTRA) activities. LTRA activities include ongoing support of treatment activities and
assessment of remedial progress. Documents detailing the methodology for LTRA activities at the
Ace Services site consist of the LTRA field sampling plan (FSP) (BVSPC 2003a), a quality
assurance project plan (QAPP) (BVSPC 2003b), a health and safety plan (HSP) (BVSPC
2003c), and the treatment plant Operation and Maintenance Plan (O&M) (BVSPC 2003d).
This Cleanup Status Report presents detailed descriptions of the remedial evaluation and
associated sampling activities performed during the performance period as part of the LTRA at the
Ace Services site. This Report includes the following items:
• Discussion of system performance and effectiveness.
Descriptions of the sampling efforts.
This Report has been prepared under USEPA Contract EP-S7-05-06 Task Order No. 0075.
The Ace Services site is located near the east edge of Colby, Kansas, at 500 East 4th Street
in Thomas County (Figure 1-1). The geographic coordinates for the site are approximately
100°02' 10" West Longitude and 39°23'47" North Latitude. The original facility was located in the
southeast quarter of Section 31, Township 7 South, Range 33 West. The groundwater contaminant
plume extends from the original facility to the east-southeast approximately 1.5 miles. The
surrounding property includes light industrial/commercial businesses and single family dwellings. A
railroad right-of-way bisects the site.
The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KD HE) records indicate that a chrome
plating facility operated at the present location of the Ace Services site from approximately 1954
to 1990. The site was owned and operated by a company known as Northwest Manufacturing
from approximately 1954 until 1969, when Ace Services was formed and began operations at the
site. Prior to the chrome plating operations, it is alleged that a brick-making plant was located in
the vicinity, possibly around the early 1900s. Among the raw materials of the brick making process,
the brick facili ty may have used clays or fuel which contained chrome, and which may have
contributed to the chrome contamination in the area.
A source of contaminants at the site includes chromium electroplating operations by Ace
Services, Inc. The source of chromium was the chromic acid solution in the plating vats. Lead was
Ace Services Silc
LTRA Cleanup Simus Report No. 5 1-1 (W4720
also present, probably as lead chromate, which is formed when lead anodes are used in the plating
process. Both contaminants entered the environment from plating vats, spills from transferring parts
to and from vats, and from a faulty wastewater treatment system. The treatment system
inadequately treated wastes and resulted in discharges from the facility exceeding wastewater
effluent limitations. Ace Services added a surface impoundment, or lagoon, to the system to control
discharges to the unnamed tributary of Prairie Dog Creek east of the site. Resulting sludge from
the surface impoundment and the underlying soils were found to be contaminated with lead and
chromium; groundwater in the area has been found to be contaminated with chromium.
KDHE and U SEP A involvement with the site began in 1971 after KDHE received a citizen
complaint concerning Ace Services discharging wastewater to the ground and the nearby unnamed
tributary. The Ace Services site was first identified for investigation under the Superfund program
in 1980 by KDHE. In 1981, KDHE conducted a Site Inspection of the Ace Services site. The
investigation by KDHE concluded that the Ace Services facility was the likely source of chromium
contamination in the groundwater which had contaminated publ ic water supply (P WS) Well No. 8
and caused the well to be removed from service in 1980. A Preliminary Assessment and Scanning
Site Investigation was performed by KDHE in 1989. A Listing Site Investigation was performed
by KDHE in 1991 which included the installation and sampling of three groundwater monitoring
wells. An additional round of groundwater samples were collected and analyzed by KDHE in
1995.
A KDHE removal action was initiated at the site in March 1992. Plating solutions were
removed from the vats. The vats and trough in which the vats were placed were also removed.
These wastes, primarily the plating solutions/baths, were disposed of at permitted disposal facilities.
The USEPA initiated a removal action at the site in May 1994 to prevent exposure of nearby
human populations to hazardous substances. The removal action consisted of removing residual
contamination (mainly dusts) from the building interior, excavation of a concrete trough and
underlying soils, installation of additional building support columns near the trough, demolition of
the wastewater treatment building, excavation of underlying soils, and excavation and
stabilization/treatment of lagoon soil. All waste was shipped off site for disposal, except
approximately 3,000 gallons of wastewater, which was treated on site and discharged to the
publicly owned treatment works (POTW).
USEPA initiated remedial investigation and feasibility study (RJ/FS) activities at the site in
1996 to characterize contaminants in groundwater and building materials and evaluate and select
RA efforts. A Remedial Investigation report and Risk Assessment report for the soil, buildings, and
groundwater at the Ace Services site was completed under the direction of the USEPA in October
1998. Residual contaminants assumed to exist in the soil at that time were found to pose acceptable
Ace Services SiteLIRA Cleanup Stains Report No 5 1-2 044720
IIIIiiiiiiiiitiiiii
health risks for industrial uses of the site. A Feasibility Study report for remediating the buildings
and groundwater at the Ace Services site was completed under the direction of the USEP A in
November 1998. The Record of Decision (ROD) for remediating the buildings and groundwater
at the Ace Services site was completed by theUSEPA in May 1999. Remedial Design (RD)
efforts for remediation of the buildings were initiated in June 1999 and were completed in
December 1999. RA activities for the existing buildings consisted of removing and disposing of
hazardous materials from the interior of the site buildings and was completed in February 2000.
RD efforts for remediation of groundwater were initiated in June 1999 and were completed
in January 2002. RA activities for contaminated groundwater include extraction of contaminated
groundwater, groundwater treatment using ion exchange resins, and discharge of treated
groundwater to the Prairie Dog Creek Tributary or beneficial use as drinking water for the City
of Colby. During demolition and excavation of the on site buildings a large amount of chromium-
contaminated soil was found which required significant removal efforts. The groundwater treatment
plant (G WTP) and extraction well field (collectively referred to as the groundwater treatment
system (G WTS)) were completed on August 12,2003, at which time groundwater extraction and
treatment began.
In October 2003, volatile organic compounds (VOC) contaminants were detected by KDHE
at low concentrations in monitoring wells and extraction wel Is located in the western portion of the
site. The source of the VOCs is believed to be the Hi-Plains Co-op leaking underground storage
tank (LUST) site located near Nashville Street and Fifth Street upgradient of the Ace Services site.
Extraction wells EX-1 -I, EX-1 -D, EX-2-I, EX-2-D, EX-2-S, and PWS-8 were taken off line
on October 17,2003, because of the presence of the VOCs in the captured groundwater. KDHE
has constructed a granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment unit to remove the VOCs. The GAC
treatment unit is positioned as a pre-treatment unit to the G WTP influent. The new GAC system
was started and the well field brought back to full operation on August 24, 2004.
Previous LTRA status reports have been prepared to describe and evaluate RA efforts. The
previous reports include:
LTRA Semi-Annual Cleanup Status Report, September and October 2003 Sample
Events (BVSPC 2004a),
L TRA A nnual Cleanup Status Report, November 2003 to April 2004 Sample Events
(BVSPC 2004c),
L TRA Cleanup Status Report Number 3, June 2004 to October 2004 Sample Events
(BVSPC 2004f), and
LTRA Cleanup Status Report Number 4, October 5, 2004 to April 30, 2005
(BVSPC 2005c).
Ace Services SiteLTRA Cleanup Slams Report No. 5 1-3 044720
v-^i_iL_iLJl_,'| jQi I, If^ iN.;lHhi rfr
500 0 500 100015002000 FeetSite LocationThomas County
BLACK & VEATCH
Figure 1-1Site LocationAce Services Site
IIIIIiIIIiiiiiiiiii
2.0 Long Term Response Action Objectives
The objectives of the LTRA are to support completion of groundwater RA activities including
assessment of the RA. Assessment of the RA will include identification of treatment goals and exit
strategy, evaluation of the performance and effectiveness of the overall RA, and evaluation of
system cost-effectiveness.
2.1 Treatment Goals and Exit StrategyIn accordance with the ROD, the primary goal of the groundwater RA for the Ace Services
site is to remediate groundwater contaminated with chromium (total) to concentrations below the
current maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 100 micrograms per liter (ug/L). The RA objective
will be attained by extracting contaminated groundwater using 13 extraction wells installed at
shallow, intermediate, and deep depths and treating the contaminated groundwater by directing the
contaminated groundwater through ion exchange resin beds.
The treated water is being discharged to the Prairie Dog Creek Tributary or beneficially
used by being pumped to the City of Colby drinking water system. Treatment goals for the
extracted groundwater have been established in the ROD. Treated water discharged to the Colby
drinking water system or to the Prairie Dog Creek Tributary must contain no more than 17 ug/L
hexavalent chromium and no more than 100 ug/L total chromium.
In support of the RA goal, KDHE has extended the public water system in Colby along
Highway 24 to make public water available to residents with private wells located within or in
proximity to the chromium plume. The new water lines and meters were installed at the end of
September 2003 and connected to residential plumbing by October 15,2003. The majority of
residents with private wells chose to switch to public water with service starting between
October 17 and November 19, 2003.
The groundwater RA will be completed when groundwater is remediated to chromium (total)
concentrations below the current MCL of 100 ug/L. The RA may be revised as appropriate
because of revised regulatory framework, new treatment technologies or strategies, the goal is
determined to be unrealistic, elevated costs, changes in plume extent, ordiscovery of additional
and/or cont inuing sources of contamination.
2.2 Performance and EffectivenessEvaluation of accomplishing the groundwater RA treatment goals and exit strategy include
groundwater monitoring, evaluation of plume capture, treatment process monitoring, and evaluation
Ace Services SiteLTRA Cleanup Stains Report No. 5 2-1 (W4720
of extraction well performance. During the performance period covered in this report (April
27, 2005 to October 12,2005), two performance audits of the operation of the GWTS were
conducted. Results of the performance audits are described in Quarterly Audit Report No. 7
(BVSPC 2005d) and Quarterly Audit Report No. 8 (BVSPC 2005e) which are included in this
report as Appendices H and I, respectively. Results of the performance audits are summarized in
the text of this report.
2.2.1 Groundwater Monitoring
Groundwater monitoring has been performed to evaluate remediation of the groundwater.
Groundwater samples were collected from site monitoring wells, extraction wells, and residential
wells and analyzed for total chromium to determine the plume extent. Groundwater elevations were
measured in all monitoring wells and extraction wells to evaluate the capture zone of the extraction
field.
Monitoring wells were sampled and analyzed for total chromium in April 2003 to determine
the extent of the chromium plume prior to groundwater extraction efforts. The results of the
baseline study are described in the Remedial Action Groundwater Contamination Baseline
Technical Memorandum (BVSPC 2003e).
Plume capture and treatment process efficiency was evaluated using groundwater monitoring
results. All wells were sampled in October 2005 as part of the semi-annual sampling effort.
Beginning in October 2004, the sampling frequency was revised from a bi-monthly sampling effort
for selected wells to a semi-annual effort for all wells. The sampling schedule is to be re-evaluated
semi-annually. The current sampling frequency of sampling all wells on a semi-annual basis appears
to be appropriate at this time.
Sampling procedures for the groundwater monitoring efforts are as described in the FSP
(BVSPC 2003a) and QAPP (BVSPC 2003b) prepared for the LTRA site activities. Completed
water level data sheets, well purging forms, sample field sheets, chain-of-custody forms, air bills,
field logbooks, and analytical result data sheets are provided in Appendices A, B, C, D, E, F and
G, respectively.
Analytical groundwater monitoring data for the site are included on Table 2-1. Groundwater
elevations in the wells that were determined from water level measurements made on October 3,
2005 are presented in Table 2-2.
2.2.2 Plume CaptureThe pumping rates are to be modified as necessary to capture the target plume as the target
plume extent varies. The target plume includes groundwater with concentrations above the current
Ace Services SiteLTRA Clcminp Slums Rcpon No. 5 2-2 044720
IIIIIIIIIiiiiiiiiii
cleanup goal of 100 ug/L. Approximate pumping rates for each extraction well are provided in
Table 2-3. As indicated, the pumping rates for the extraction wells are adjusted as necessary in
response to plume extent, aquifer conditions, and available well yield to capture the target plume.
Pumping rates at wells EX-2-S and EX-4-S have been turned off; wells EX-3-S and EX-5-S have
been reduced because of low watertable conditions; and wells EX-1 -I, EX-1 -D, EX-4-I/D and
EX-5-I/D have been increased to support plume capture. The other extraction wells were
operated at or above proposed pumping rates unless temporarily shut down for maintenance or
repair. Details concerning operation of the well field are provided in the attached performance
audit reports (Appendices H and I).
The capture zone of the wel 1 field can be interpreted from groundwater potentiometric surface
maps which are illustrated on Figures 2-1,2-2, and 2-3, respectively. Groundwater potentiometric
surface maps were prepared using G1S software with a contour extension which provides a
statistical approximation of the groundwater table contour. The extent of the 100 ug/L chromium
isoconcentration contours for the shallow, intermediate, and deep zones in October 2005 are
illustrated in addition to the groundwater table contour on Figures 2-1,2-2, and 2-3, respectively.
The data on the figures indicate that the capture zone created by the extraction field has created
hydraulic control of the target chromium plume. Figure 2-4 illustrates the groundwater flow
direction in vertical cross section for October 3,2005. Data plotted on Figures 2-5,2-6,2-7, and
2-8 also indicate a decreasing trend in chromium concentrations in groundwater at the site.
A comparison of the current chromium isoconcentration contours (October 2005) to the
baseline chromium isoconcentration contours (April 2003) on Figures 2-1,2-2, and 2-3 indicate
that the chromium plume has significantly reduced in extent since start-up of the GWTS in
August 2003. However, data were showing a gradual increase i n chromium concentrations in the
area of the former treatment plant. The concentration of chromium in the shallow zone of the Ace
Recovery Well (ARW), and to a lesser extent in the intermediate and deep zones, had increased
significantly since startup of the GWTS. Recently however, chromium concentrations have
decreased since the last sample round conducted in April 2005. In the shallow zone, the chromium
concentration increased from approximately 17 ug/L total chromium in April 2003 to 3810 ug/L
total chromium in April 2005 and has now decreased to 1600 ug/L. The concentration increase
at the ARW is most likely attributable to chromium leaching from residual source material that
remains on the former plating facility. To support capture of the chromium plume in this area, the
pumping rates of wells EX-1 -1 and EX-1 -D were increased immediately upon review of the draft
sampling results in April 2005 and currently remain at the higher pumping rates
Chromium concentrations in residential wells continue to remain below detection or continue
to decrease as indicaied in Table 2-1 except for well RW-5 which showed an increase in
Ace Services SiteLTRA Cleanup Slams Report No. 5 2-3 044720
chromium to 36.2 ug/L. Chromium concentrations at RW-2 temporarily increased from non-detect
in April 2004 to 61 ug/L in October 2004, however, the chromium concentration has been
decreasing in subsequent sample rounds as indicated in Table 2-1. The chromium concentration
at well RW-8, which is located downgradient of the eastern most extraction well, has decreased
since the extraction wells were brought online which indicates sufficient extraction efforts at.
EX-4-1/D and 5-I/D to achieve adequate control of the eastern portion of the plume.
The groundwater monitoring data indicate that the remedial goals are achievable and the
groundwater monitoring program is adequate for evaluating the remedial action. The groundwater
monitoring data do not indicate the presence of contaminant source areas other than the former
plating facility.
2.2.3 Groundwater Treatment System Performance Monitoring
Performance monitoring of the GWTS includes monitoring of key plant operations and
evaluation of conformance to specified requirements for system operation by the plant operator
(City of Colby). The audits include a site visit to observe the City of Colby operators and obtain
key plant operating data on a quarterly basis. The results of the quarterly performance monitoring
evaluations are detailed in quarterly performance audit reports. The quarterly performance audit
reports prepared for the two audit periods included in this reporting period are presented in
Appendices H and I. Performance monitoring results are summarized in Table 2-4. Overall, the
GWTS is performing at design expectations.
2.2.4 Extraction Well Performance
Evaluation of extraction well performance will be conducted regularly to maintain optimum
well efficiency. Reduction of more than 10% in the specific capacity of an extraction well may
indicate well fouling. Well fouling is blockage of the well screen which occurs from bacterial
growth and chemical precipitation in the screen portion of the wells. Well rehabilitation was last
completed for all extraction wells in December 2004.
2.3 System Cost-EffectivenessAn evaluation of cost-effectiveness of the treatment system was performed to optimize RA
efforts. The evaluation compared actual costs of operation to projected costs which were
validated as cost effective in comparison to other potential remedial options. In addition, the
evaluation considered upgrades or replacement of system elements that may improve overall cost
effectiveness and/or reduce remediation time. Continuous improvement can occur by periodically
Ace Services SiteI.TRA Cleanup Slnlus Report No. 5 2-4 044720
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
evaluating goals, performance, and cost effectiveness and then implementing changes from these
evaluations.
As discussed in Quarterly Performance Audit Reports No. 1 and No. 8 (Appendices H and
I), the treatment cost including only cost for resin, transportation, and disposal and excluding labor
and utilities, which are not available, is 0.155 cents per gallon during the seventh audit period and
0.152 cents per gallon during the eighth. This is an increase from 0.130 cents per gallon during the
sixth audit period when the average chromium loading was essentially the same and it is evidence
of the poor resin performance during the seventh and eighth audit periods. This is still a significant
reduction from 0.210 cents per gallon from the performance test and 0.166 cents per gallon from
the first audit period when average influent chromium concentrations were higher. These costs
demonstrate the efficiency of the ion exchange process in this application. There is insufficient data
at this time to compute the total cost per gal Ion to treat the extracted groundwater including labor
and plant utilities. However, it is anticipated that these costs will be a relatively small part of the
total.
GWTP data indicate that as the average influent chromium concentration drops below about
300 ug/L, an increase in the gallons treated per bed is not achieved. Every bed with an average
chromium influent concentration below 350 ug/L treated between 31 and 35 million gallons of
water with no correlation to chromium concentration. Substantial resin quality problems were
encountered during the seventh and eighth audit periods resulting in poor resin performance.
During this time period, resin treatment performance dropped to between 26 and 30 million gallons
treated per bed. The resin quality issues were resolved by the end of the eighth audit period.
Further details are provided in section 2.3 of the seventh and eighth audit reports (Appendicies H
and J). Now that the resin quality issues have been resolved, unless the influent chromium
concentrations again rise above 350 ug/L, each bed can be anticipated to treat approximately
33 million gallons of groundwater from the extraction wells.
Upgrades or replacement of system elements that may improve overall cost effectiveness
and/or reduce remediation time, treatment goals, performance, and cost effectiveness are evaluated
as an ongoing part of the LTRA effortand are discussed in the attached quarterly performance
audit reports.
Ace Services SileLTRA Cleanup Status Report No. 5 2-5 044720
Table 2-1Analytical Results Summary
April 2003 through October 2005
Ace Services Site
Well
Number
Tots
(ucApril2003
October2003
Shallow WellsMW 1 SMW 2 SMW 4 SMW 5 SMW 6 SMW 7 SMW 8 SMW 9 SMW 11 SMW 12 SMW 13 SMW 14 SMW 15 SMW 16 SMW 17 SMW 18 S
ARW - SOB 1 SOB 2 S
HPMW 3 SHPMW 6 SHPMW 9 S
EX 2 SEX 3 SEX 4 SEX 5 S
1.1 U60.13.82.6
1.9(1.8)48.11850285
182
36.4 (36.1)173
133204
1.7
25.164.617.1279
360-
1.4
0.91-
.
-
15 U2315 U15 U15 U15 U15 U19
60
15 U152
51
200
15 U15 U42
55215 U61
15 U-
-
41
184
8162
April2004
15 U19.115 U15 U15 U4515 U116
19.115 U
92.8 (97.9)23.5232
15 U15U(15U)
15 U164025.8458
--
780
203
113
15 U20.4
slCr/L)
October2004
15 UJ15 U
l~ 15 U15 U15 U
314
23.1193
26.515 U
43.522.519915 U15
15 U261050.156.5
-
15 U-
10693.415 U
25.9
April2005
15 U15 U15 U15 U15 U
45.715 U15 U15 U15 U15 U15 U10315 U15 U15 U
381015 U15 UJ-
15 U--
15 U15 U15 U
October2005
10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U
10.937.659
14.210.610 U
10.6111
10 U11.410 U
160010 U
30.3-
10 U17.2
-
33.817.921.6
Ace Services SileLTKA Cleanup Status Report No. 5 2-6 044720
Table 2-1 (Continued)Analytical Results Summary
Apr i l 2003 through October 2005Ace Services Site
Well
Number
Tots
(ucApril2003
October2003
April2004
Intermediate WellsMW 1MW 2MW 4MW 5MW 6MW 7MW 8
MW 9MW 11MW 12
MW 13MW 14MW 15MW 16MW 17MW 18
ARW -OB 1OB 2EX 1EX 2EX 3EX 4 I/CEX 5 I/C
PWS 8
0.7 U949 (1000)24.7
10.9(10.8)14.513.21960
1920267
132
283
10756.43.83.9
17.94.9155
408---
--
-
15 U955 (953)
15 U15 U15 U15 U56
416
103(105)113
110
143
171
15 U15 U15 U
26585
15 U1390527 (548)
-
156116940
15 U1580
15 U15 U15 U15 U
89.2 (87)
168019.118.3
58.644.9121
15 U15 U15 U
111077.2111
1060997
311
14593.22290
alCr/L)
October2004
15 U1160
15 U15 U15 U
29.252.5
258
15 U15 U
35.6 (24.6)30.320.515 U15 U15 U
123079.8207
1360553296
10688.21190
April2005
15U(15U)686 (678)
15 U15 U15 U15 U15 U
15.715 U15 U
15 U15 U15 U15 U15 U15 U
169015 U170
953
205145(156)
43.127.0443
October2005
10 U40610 U10 U10 U10 U
10.7(10.4)
1710 U10 U
10
13
10 U10 U10 U10 U
794
10 U132926
181135
61
51350 (344)
Ace Services SiteLIRA Cleanup Status Report No. 5 2-7 044720
Table 2-1 (Continued)Analytical Results Summary
April 2003 through October 2005Ace Services Site
Well
Number
Tots(uc
April2003
October2003
April2004
Deep WellsMW 1 D
MW 2 DMW 3 DMW 4 DMW 5 DMW 6 DMW 7 DMW 8 D
MW 9 DMW 11 DMW 12 DMW 13 D
MW 15 D
MW 16 DMW 17 DMW 18 D
ARW - DOB 1 DOB 2 DEX 1 DEX 2 DEX 3 D
5.6
1846.7
1.6
1.810826.1478
33406823.7 (3.6)221
1240(1260)2
22.1132
6.4
12902770
--
-
15 U
35
15 U15.9(16.4)
15 U71
15 U15 U
15 U15 U15 U70
999
15 U15 U15 U
68
99
228
34
485
409
15 U
16833515 U15 U
33.733.893.4
1620(1650)15 U15 U15 U
273
15 U15 U15 U
194
513
604
53.7485
177
j lCr/L)
October2004
15 U85.415 U
46.415 U
20.835.415 U
121
15 U15 U15 U
134
15 U15 U15 U
188(198)60.6257
53.7331
78
April2005
15 U
55.215 U15 U15 U15 U15 U15 U
15 U15 UJ15 U15 UJ
41.715 U15 U15 U
291
15 U51.9
15U(15U)11915.4
October2005
10 U
10U(10U)10 U10 U
21.110 U10 U10 U
10.110 U10 U10 U
37.210U(10U)
10 U10 U
277
10 U11.617.453.836.9
Ace Services SiteLIRA Cleanup Status Report No. 5 2-8 044720
Table 2-1 (Continued)Analytical Results Summary
April 2003 through October 2005Ace Services Site
Well
Number
Total Cr(ug/L)
April2003
October2003
April2004
Residential WellsRW 1RW 2RW 3RW 4RW 5RW 6RW 7RW 8RW 9
27.11.93.23.66.294.147.575.72.4
-15 U15 U15 U15 U5517
63
15 U
-15 U15 U15 U15 U15 U15 U
74.315 U
October2004
-6115 U15 U15 U15 U15 U
50.115 U
April2005
-22.115 U15 U15 U15 U15 U15 U15 U
October2005
-11.210 U10 U
36.210 U10 U
29.910 U
Duplicate results in parenthesesCr = chromium
ug/L = microgram per literU = qualified as nondetectJ = qualified as nondetectS = shallow
I = intermediateD = deep
MW = monitoring wellHPMW = Hi-Plains Co-op monitoring wellOB = Observation WellARW = Ace Recovery wellPWS = public water supplyRW = residential wellEX = extraction wellSC = sample connection
Ace Services SilcLTRA Cleanup Status Report No. 5 2-9 044720
Table 2-2Groundwater Elevation Data
October 2005Ace Services Site
WellMW-1-S
MW-1-1
MW-1-D
MW-2-S
MW-2-I
MW-2-D
MW-3-D
MW-4-S
MW-4-I
MW-4-D
MW-5-S
MW-5-I
MW-5-D
MW-6-S
MW-6-I
MW-6-D
MW-7-S
MW-7-I
MW-7-D
MW-8-S
MW-8-I
MW-8-D
MW-9-S
MW-9-I
MW-9-D
MW-11-S
MW-11-1
MW-11-D
ConstructedTotal Depth (ft)
125
162
220
123
195
237
220
120
179
229
120
185
230
132
190
237
140
190
243
132
195
239
132
190
236
140
200
248.5
Top of CasingElevation (ft)
3141.62
3141.63
3141.11
3136.17
3136.07
3137.72
3138.15
3127.79
3128.13
3128.30
3131.75
3131.63
3132.27
3137.70
3137.78
3137.97
3149.07
3148.93
3148.74
3140.79
3140.20
3139.90
3143.63
3143.48
3143.26
3149.47
3149.88
3150.35
October 3, 2005Depth to Water
from Top ofCasing (ft)
115.22
115.35
114.95
113.33
115.59
120.33
116.57
107.12
107.76
110.93
112.72
112.65
117.20
115.18
115.53
117.48
129.53
129.70
132.29
122.50
121.96
122.22
125.99
12841
133.53
133.55
134 33
137.54
GroundwaterElevation(ft MSL)3026.40
3026.28
3026.16
3022.84
3020.48
3017.39
3021.58
3020.67
3020.37
3017.37
3019.03
3018.98
3015.07
3022.52
3022.25
3020.49
3019.54
3019.23
3016.45
3018.83
3017.98
3017.68
3015.22
3009.95
3009.73
3015.92
3015.55
3012.81
Ace Services SilcLTRA Cleanup Slams Report No. 5 2-10
044720
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Table 2-2 (Continued)
Groundwater Elevation Data
October 2005
Ace Services Site
WellMW-12-S
MW-12-1
MW-12-D
MW-13-S
MW-13-1
MW-13-D
MW-14-S
MW-14-1
MW-15-S
MW-15-1
MW-15-D
MW-16-S
MW-16-1
MW-16-D
MW-17-SMW-17-1
MW-17-D
MW-18-S
MW-18-1
MW-18-D
OB-01-S
OB-01-1OB-01-D
OB-02-S
OB-02-I
OB-02-D
HPMW-3-S
HPMW-6-S
HPMW-9-S
HPMW-12-S
ConstructedTotal Depth (ft)
165
211
263.5
165
211
263.5
165
211
165
211
263.5
165
211
263.5
165
211
263.5
165
211
263.5
165
211
263.5
165
211
263.5
124.7
124.63
125
115
Top of CasingElevation (ft)
3169.43
3169.54
3169.35
3155.56
3156.39
3156.93
3161.27
3161.05
3161.53
3162.63
3163.63
3159.41
3160.29
3161.07
3165.66
3165.38
3164.78
3164.60
3165.09
3165.18
3143.88
3143.50
3143.17
3140.78
3139.84
3139.31
3139.74
reconst.
reconst.
3137.14
October 3, 2005Depth to Water
from Top ofCasing (ft)
156.02
156.67
158.00
139.99
141.59
143.95
149.77
149.99
148.38
150.64
152.22
142.60
143.67
146.08
151.67
151.61
152.37
152.78
153.55
154.55
126.34
128.05
131.89
123.39
124.06
127.95
-
113.97
112.19
110.14
GroundwaterElevation(ft MSL)3013.41
3012.87
3011.35
3015.57
3014.80
3012.98
3011.50
3011.06
3013.15
3011.99
3011.41
3016.81
3016.62
3014.99
3013.99
3013.77
3012.41
3011.82
3011.54
3010.63
3017.54
3015.45
3011.28
3017.39
3015.78
3011.36
-
-
.
3027.00
Ace Services SiteLIRA Cleanup Status Report No. 5 2-11
044720
Table 2-2 (Continued)Groundwater Elevation Data
October 2005Ace Services Site
WellEX-1-1
EX-1-D
EX-2-S
EX-2-I
EX-2-D
EX-3-S2
EX-3-I2
EX-3-D
EX-4-S3
EX-4-I/D
EX-5-S1
EX-5-I/D
PWS-8"
ConstructedTotal Depth (ft)
220
245
140
205
245
175
215
265
168
273
175
278
250
Top of CasingElevation (ft)
3137.62
3137.71
3145.52
3144.96
3144.98
3156.28
3155.85
3155.60
3165.52
3164.72
3162.59
3161.36
3142.10
October 3, 2005Depth to Water
from Top ofCasing (ft)
120.20
129.50
128.02
140.20
154.70
144.08
154.10
150.30
152.10
162.00
153.85
156.30
127.45
GroundwaterElevation(ft MSL)3017.42
3008.21
3017.50
3004.76
2990.28
3012.20
3001.75
3005.30
3013.42
3002.72
3008.74
3005.06
3014.65
1TOC trimmed and survey reference adjusted on 10-06-032TOC trimmed and survey reference adjusted on 03/15/04: EX-3-S = 3156.28, EX-3-I = 3155.85
^TOC trimmed and survey reference adjusted on 04/05/04. EX-4-S = 3165.52
"Survey reference adjusted on 06/08/04: MW-2-D = 3137.07 + 0.65 = 3137.72, PWS-8 = 3143.080.98 = 3142.10MSL = mean sea level
Ace Services SiteLIRA Cleanup Status Report No. 5 2-12
044720
Table 2-3Treatment GoalsAce Services Site
Well
EX-1-1
EX-1-D
EX-2-S
EX-2-I
EX-2-D
EX-3-S
EX-3-I
EX-3-D
EX-4-S
EX-4-I/D
EX-5-S
EX-5-I/D
PWS-8
Top ofCasing
Elevation(ft)
3137.62
3137.71
3145.52
3144.96
3144.98
3156.28
3155.85
3155.60
3165.52
3164.72
3162.59
3161.36
3142.10
GroundElevation1
(msl)
3136.4
3136.4
3143.7
3143.7
3143.7
3154.4
3154.4
3154.4
3163.6
3163.6
3160.5
3160.5
3141.3
ConstructedTotal Depth
(ft bgs)
220
245
140
205
245
175
215
265
168
273
175
278
250
WellScreenLength
(ft)
55
30
30
50
40
35
40
50
20
90
20
95
10
5
10
25
Well ScreenInterval(ft bgs)
155 - 210
205 - 235
100 - 130
145 - 195
195 - 235
130 - 165
165 - 205
205 - 255
138 - 158
173 - 263
145 - 165
173 - 268
128 - 138
145 - 150
190 - 200
215 - 240
Well ScreenInterval
Elevation(msl)
2981 - 2926
2931 - 2901
3044 - 3014
2999 - 2949
2949 - 2909
3024 - 2989
2989 - 2949
2949 - 2899
3026 - 3006
2991 - 2901
3015 - 2995
2988 - 2893
3013 - 3003
2996 - 2991
2951 - 2941
2926 - 2901
total pumping rate =
ModeledInitial
ProposedPumping
Rate (gpm)
35 2
40 2
25 2
100 2
100 2
25 2
50 2
75 2
25 2
100 3
25 2
100 3
125 2
825 gpm
April2005
PumpingRate (gpm)
35
40
O 4
85 8
100
20 5
50
75
O 6
125 7
20 5
125 7
125
800 gpm
May2005
PumpingRate (gpm)
35
40
O 4
85°
100
20 5
50
. 75
O 6
125 7
20 s
125 7
125
800 gpm
June2005
PumpingRate (gpm)
70 9
70s
O 4
85 8
100
20 5
50
75
0 s
125 7
20 =
125 7
125
865 gpm
July2005
PumpingRate (gpm)
70 9
70 9
O 4
85 8
100
20 5
50
75
O 6
125 7
20 5
125 7
125
865 gpm
August2005
PumpingRate (gpm)
70 9
70 9
O 4
85 e
100
20 5
50
75
O 6
125 7
20s
125 7
125
865 gpm
September2005
PumpingRate (gpm)
70 9
70 9
O 4
100
100
20 5
50
75
O 6
125 7
20 5
125 7
125
880 gpm
October2005
PumpingRate (gpm)
70 9
70 9
O 4
100
100
20 5
50
75
O 6
125 7
155
125 7
125
875 gpm
CurrentProposedPumping
Rate (gpm)
70 9
70 9
O 4
100
100
20 5
50
75
O 6
125 7
155
125 7
125
875 gpm
Note 1 = Pad Elevation from Carlson's Surveying & Mapping Inc. January 16, 2003;
Note 2 = Addendum No. 2 Technical Memorandum RD Sampling Activities December 19, 2001;
Note 3 = Addendum No. 3 Technical Memorandum RD Sampling Activities July 2, 2002;
Note 4 = Groundwater in EX-2-S drawn down to unsustainable pumping level by EX-2-I and EX-2-D.
Note 5 = Pumping rate reduced because of low aquifer conditions.
Note 6 = Well not running because of low aquifer conditions.
Note 7 = Pumping rate for wells EX-4-I/D and EX-5-I/D increased to supportcapture of downgradient plume (BVSPC 2004a);
Note 8 = pumping rate reduced due to partial pump failure
Note 9 = Pumping rate for well EX-1-1 and EX-1-D increasesd to support captureof increased chromium concentrations at the Ace Recovery Well.
Ace Services SiteLTRA Cleanup Status Report No. 5 2-13 044720
Table 2-4Performance Monitoring Results
Ace Services Site
Month(Current Reporting Period)
Last part April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
Early part October 2005
Total Influent(million gallons)
3.4
32.5
32.6
36.5
37.1
34.6
15.2
Chromium Removed(kg)
3.5
26.8
25.1
29.2
29.6
23.8
10.6
Previous Performance Periods
June 13, 2003- July 18, 2004(Performance Test)
Aug. 12, 2003 -Oct. 1, 2003(Audit Report No. 1)
Oct. 1 , 2003 - Feb. 16, 2004(Audit Report No. 2)
Feb. 17, 2004- June 6, 2004(Audit Report No. 3)
June 6, 2004 - Oct. 4, 2004(Audit Report No. 4)
October 5, 2004 - Feb. 28, 2005(Audit Report No. 5)
March 1 , 2005 - April 26, 2005(Audit Report No. 6)
April 27, 2005 - July 20, 2005(Audit Report No. 7)
July 21, 2005 - October 12, 2005(Audit Report No. 8)
Groundwater Treated(million gallons)
41
54
83
71
94
140
62
90
102
Total Chromium removed June 2003 through October 2005 =
Chromium Removed
(kg)
136
105
74
48
95
184
52
72
76
842
Treatment Criteria
Max Drinking Water Acceptance Criteria =
1 7 ug^L hexavalent chromium
100 ug/L total chromium
100 ug/L total chromium
Ace Services SiteLIRA Cleanup Stain Report No. 5 2-14 044720
I• 3.0 Bibliography
' BVSPC 1 998a, Remedial Investigation Report, Ace Services Site, October 1 998.
I BVSPC 1 998b, Final Feasibility Study, Ace Services Site, November 1 998.
| BVSPC 2003a, Field Sampling Plan, Ace Services Site, July 2003 .
| BVSPC 2003b, LTRA Quality Assurance Project Plan, Ace Services Site, July 2003.
I BVSPC 2003c, LTRA Health and Safety Plan, Ace Services Site, July 2003.
I BVSPC 2003d, General System Operation & Maintenance Manual Ground Water Treatment
Plant, Ace Services Site, May 2003.
* BVSPC 2003e, Remedial Action Groundwater Contamination Baseline Technical
M Memorandum, Ace Services Site, August 7, 2003.
BVSPC 2003 f, LTRA Audit Report No. 1, Ace Services Site, November 1 0, 2003 .^
BVSPC 2004a, LTRA Semi-Annual Cleanup Status Report, Ace Services Site, January 9,
2004.
I BVSPC 2004b, LTRA Audit Report No. 2, Ace Set-vices Site, March 1 9, 2004.
• BVSPC 2004c, LTRA Annual Cleanup Status Report, Ace Services Site, June 9, 2004.
• BVSPC 2004d, LTRA Audit Report No. 3, Ace Services Site, July 2, 2004.
_ BVSPC 2004e, LTRA Audit Report No. 4, Ace Services Site, November 1 9, 2004.
BVSPC 2004f, LTRA Cleanup Status Report Number 3, Ace Services Site, December 22,
I 2004.
IAce Services Silc
• LTRA Cleanup Status Report No. 5 3-1 044720
BVSPC 2005a, LTRA Audit Report No. 5, Ace Services Site, April 22, 2005.
BVSPC 2005b, LTRA Audit Report No. 6, Ace Sen'ices Site, June 24, 2005.
BVSPC 2005c, LTRA Cleanup Status Report Number 4, Ace Services Site, July 20, 2005.
BVSPC 2005d, LTRA Audit Report No. 7, Ace Services Site, August 26, 2005.
BVSPC 2005e, LTRA Audit Report No. 8, Ace Services Site, November 18, 2005.
Fetter, C. W., 1988, Applied Hydrogeology, Merrill Publishing Co., Columbus, Ohio.
USEPA 2001, Amended Record of Decision, Ace Services Site, September 13, 2001.
USEPA 2002, Elements for Effective Management of Operating Pump and Treat Systems,
542-R-02-009, OSWER 9355.4-27FS, October 2002.
Ace Services SilcLTRA Cleanup Siauis Report No. 5 3-2 044720
IIIIII
Appendix A
Water Level Data Sheets
IOctober 2005
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiii
10-03-05Water Level Data Sheet
Ace Services Site LIRA PVCAfeovlE
Well Date Time
WaterLevel from
TOC (ft)
TotalDepth (ft
bgs) Well Date Time
WaterLevel from
TOC (ft)
TotalDepth (ft
bgs) Well Date Time
WaterLevel from
TOC (ft)
TotalDepth (ft
bgs)
MW-1-S KJ03 125 MW-12-S 165 ARW-S 125-135
MW-1-1 162 MW-12-1 211 ARW-I 161-171
MW-1-D 7003 i 220 MW-12-D 264 ARW-D 209-225
MW-2-S 123 MW-13-S TOOP 7635 769.39 143 NA- NA-
MW-2-I 195 MW-13-1 74/^59 206 RW-2 NA NA
MW-2-D 237 MW-13-D ATP 265 RW-3 NA NA
RW-4 NA NA
MW-3-D 220 MW-14-S m& 744C 155 RW-5 NA NA
MW-14-1 IQtCft 217 RW-6 NA NA
MW-4-S 120 RW-7 NA NA
MW-4-I 179 MW-15-S 165 RW-8 NA NA
MW-4-D
MW-5-S
229 MW-15-1 7-W57 213 RW-9 NA NA
MW-15-D 267 HPMM&10/O3120 -HPMW-S-S
10.fr125
MW-5-I 185 MW-16-S iom 155 (luA-T ye. UMW-5-D 230 MW-16-1 215 EX-1-1
MW-16-D xShstsffl 275 EX-1-D
MW-6-S 132 HPHW& 7QTJ9MW-6-I 190 MW-17-S ro/r? 158 jKEX-2-S* 140
MW-6-D 237 MW-17-1 / 0 3 A5/.6T 205 EX-2-I ,& Mos tooMW-17-D 1S16 1623? 265 I^EX-2-D
MW-7-S 140 UPHW-S 113MW-7-I 190 MW-18-S mz 165
MW-7-D 243 MW-18-1 G3 225 Iftfift .7OaT215
MW-18- 265
MW-8-S 132
MW-8-1 195 OB-1-S 130 158.70°MW-8-D 239 OB-1-1 195 ^EX-4-l/D X^OC^^s
OB-1-D 235
MW-9-S 132 JKEX-5-S /Oilf lMW-9-1 190 OB-2-S 130 EX-5-I/D fegg.a?aT27BMW-9-D 236 OB-2-I 192
OB-2-D 235 PWS-8 250
MW-11-
MW-11-1
MW-11-D
140
200 - SC-1- NA NA
249 SC-9 NA NA' t>6 Pb* Water level only
Inspector GARY E * KfM
TOP Or
Ace Services Site - LTRA
Form Revision 6/4/2004 BVSPC 46132
Water Level Data Sheet
Ace Services Site LTRA
Well
MW-1-S
MW-1-1
MW-1-D
MW-2-S
MW-2-I
MW-2-D
MW-3-D
MW-4-S
MW-4-I
MW-4-D
MW-5-S
MW-5-I
MW-5-D
MW-6-S
MW-6-I
MW-6-D
MW-7-S
MW-7-I
MW-7-D
MW-8-S
MW-8-I
MW-8-D
M%MB^ "
TfBtP&^m'
Mgg»
MW-11-S
MW-11-1
MW-11-D
Date
'0/3/&
&*&*
0$-±523:^£
Time
Jlo3
P-V32'-eS
IS"'2 ',50
p:-<9
2:*7P-.Y5-
?:?3
^••333,'5-t?:•>?
3'~tf
y:/7
?•'*
J:*7Z>\tt
Z'/L
D:do212'p. 21
3:0?
•J.'07
->;05
WaterLevel fromTOC (ft)
//J.3J
//s; 5-9-
l36'3*>
I07.ll
I0l.^
,/C.1*>
\&.-l3*
//5>.&sr
rtf^o
//-5, 1 1
nsv**//7,V«
.',99. S3/<? f. 70
/J*-P9
/AP-30
!*>.</(.I2.T-.L.L
133, 3?APY. o^/<?7. *T
/35-^/3V- 53
/3> s-V
As-BuiltTotal
Depth (ttbgs)
|_ 125
162 /
220
123
195
237
220
120
179
229
120
185
230
132
190
237
140
190
243
132
195
239 X
132
190 >'
236
140
200
249
Well
MW-12-S
MW-12-1
MW-12-D
MW-13-S
MW-13-1
MW-13-D
MW-14-S
MW-14-1
MW-15-S
MW-15-1
MW-15-D
MW-16-S
MW-16-1
MW-16-D
MW-17-S
MW-17-1
MW-17-D
MW-18-S
^W-18-l
MW-18-D
OB-1-S
OB- 1-1
OB-1-D
ta^^^^ar^^^^^^
T*^*OK>-
Date
°&
HfTIM-W
Time
3- It
•j:<Y
3;/a
\^/YarH«
^:V<?
^orI437
WaterLevel fromTOC (ft)
/rc.ojL/5t.b>
/5» ^a
(2^^12$^
;ii.W
05, 77/^. y/133,5-?
AS-bUlltTotal
Depth (ftbgs)
165
211
264
143
206
265
155
217
165
213
267
155
215
275
158
205
265
165
225
265
130
195
235
130
192
235
Well
ARW-S
ARW-I
ARW-D
RW-1
RW-2
RW-3
RW-4
RW-5
RW-6
RW-7
RW-8
RW-9
HPMW-3-S*
HPMW-6-S
HPMW-9-S
HPMW-12-S*
EX-1-1
EX-1-D
EX-2-S
EX-2-I
EX-2-D
EX-3-S
EX-3-I
EX-3-D
EX^I-S
EX-4-I/D
EX-5-S
EX-5-I/D
PWS-8
Date Time
WaterLevel fromTOC (ft)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
"
AS-bUlltTotal
Depth (ftbgs)
125-135
161-171
209-225
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
125
125
125
115
210
235
130
195
235
165
205
255
158
263
165
268
240 -
" Water level only.
Inspector
Ace Services She
I.TKA I-SP
I
I
I
IIIIIIM Appendix B
Well Purging Forms
IOctober 2005
I
iiiiiiiii
1I
1
1•111111111111111
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
PffiMm&FflviCE£ LTRAP^Numbw044?iaO.O/.4?
NGUMWELL DATA 1 r\£Total Well Depth 1 iffi)
Page 1 of / .
Well Number
MW-1-S ,Date/o- n-m
Well Diameter ^L |nitial Water Level Jlfi.Sj?,Water Column Height $„ 7^Q
3 Well Volumes j(9. / qa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTV Pumping
s
Air Lift
Well Vo(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ftlume (gals) f/j i TQ
Amount of Water Removed from Well _/;
Surging Bailing
g 2", (xY6& qal/ft @ 4"1
iy~\t(aLJ 3 aals
Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal 'OL/BM£RfS/E>L.E> lUMP Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes Jo)
Method of Sample Collection (DLJBMEJ^I BLJE. lUMP
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
76 1W76 1R1G>£51(bcT)1G>35/Gxjo
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
WtfotfiGA-/v5.6(2>W.G4.£bLL£
ATTo/.fln?7.5tto/.^?Yorrr
jiA5r»,r^G>Gfi(o.Cofi
MPLE
-n?-1.fi-£n-£4-#/S?r
O4As*\ ^}f*3
^\ ^}^\
Off?,15 -31
TtTvO/fifing
7A9.0
Checked By Date
Version 6-11-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
fOJGCl iN3JJiG ^» -^ * *"T™ " AAT.?. fiERviCFfi LIRA Project Numbej 4^7^ Q/ 47
WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water 1Water Colum
3 Well Volurr
METHOD OF
>pth /uJv», _/ 1 ^^J • ^ T
n Height ^O.Cftl?
es »J7/ . oa
' WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
14O514 ro1414-144914,837485
Mc\u£
Is
Air Lift
Am
Well Diameter 4-
Well Vc
ount of Wate
Surging
OLLECTION/PURGING
\&LJBMERfil RLE PUMPSUBMERSIBLE PUMP
Page / of / .
Well Number
nw-i-i
(x) (height) x=.lB3 gal/ftlume (gals) L^O. ^p
r Removed from Well
Bailing
@ 2", £=^653~gal/ft @ A"
/\_j t Oj aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^c^
IAY AFTF-RNOCW. RAIM^C, ALL. DAY.
TEMP (°C)
SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
iFMP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/^4?j/i4)^1546>154&ChuJ
IffRr.T9//.i9/?/.oQ9rrrS
? ?D6 5S6 GOGG>1
SMPLZ
O.fo
~/./?,•/ \5^^
O-fl?0, 70 ;Lq0.7/S*?&-£&
•PrfifV)
/SWfi'SDisS5oo.ro)
Checked By
Version 6- 14 -04
Date
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I' •
1
1
1
1E
-
1\
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Slack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
^^aBte£WCfiS L,TRA Project "^fo^ypQ ^ ^
F,eld lnVest,gator(s) ^ LANGLlM
WELL DATATotal Well Denitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OFV
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of Si
Physical App
Remarks
TIME
/44iQ
74-4?mi?,7i5fi&1SOS
pth /CTTTJevel 7 /^.£J5nHeiaht IC&.Ofi
es ft~tD5*& ga
WELL DEVPumping
• SAMPLE C
ater Remova
ample Collec
earance
ELOPMENT
Is
Air Lift
Am
Page _]_ of 7 .
Well Number
MW-1-D
Well Diameter 4+
Well Vo
ount of Wate
Surging
OLLECTION/PURGING
. SUBMERSIBLE PUMPuon £)U&MEf&tflL£ PUMP
(x) (height) x=.163gal/tt(lume(gals) ^ofi.5k9
r Removed from Well
Bailing
a 2",Oc=-653 gal/ft (^4n
\J^(^J aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes QNO)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
Mx%
l5fXi>fCj.lJL}
Com
Q473R
O.^JJSn^fp•crfiA
?.fi1
?.i*n?.4&?43
MPLF.
f*\ ^\f\^f Q^
-^^g-fi.9-/23^/ft??
J2/39E<fftr^/SSc? OJDr ./CJLJ
/8//i?3££L&/8GG.V5"^9Q^
Checked By Date
Version 6- 14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
y^$£R.wc.&5 LTRAi lOIGCl iNLJf I lOcf^^fc j* ^ /^i X^ ^\ /^ W Jt 4^1
1 ^L I * ^^ -*• 1 I 1 f ^^f ^^
WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water LWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OFV
pth /fy!v n ievel 7 70 'C^n Heiqht &.(f7
es /O,C7 aals
WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
OflOfnsrtf09/0O91fi0313OSPfi
Page 7 of /
Well Number
MW-Q-SDate/0-CGrOq
/^ // 1Well Diameter 'f- |
(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ftWell Volume (gals) (t).31
g2",£=.653gal/tt@4")
Amount of Water Removed from Well /OCJ aalsl
Surging Bailing
OLLECTION/PURGING
^SUBMERSIBLE PUMPion SUBMERSIBLE PtJtfP
Other I
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes CNO)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC- pH
TIVITYTURBIDITY DO ORP
WATER
LEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
A9S4.14.3574,3374./SS£om
JfejL/ fi^QRw ^Aso?4t3 6.A8?43 6.A9
^crAiU^-^ #/87
fl.65aap,fi.\5Ofl.fi?^-/(D
L%8. /
(JlIJLJ 07O "y^ i>>
OfifO /"
Checked By Date
Version 6- 14-04
111•
1\
111111111111111
Slack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name^ fi£R]/K]& LTR6
Field investigator^)^
A/ELL DATAFotal Well Denitial Water LWater Columr
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF
\/ F
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of SB
Physical App
Remarks
TIME
flSQS000?
Q9/£09 r 8
pth /<3vevel / /vi Height ^
es /vJO
[*roject Numbb447PO. H/.4?'NMY LANQUMa &?'y . Well Diameter 0(.
Page / of I .
Well Number
MW-fi-I75-O4-Q5
A"T.AS . (x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft (5> 2". x={653 gal/ft 0)4"i9,4Tf
. C3 gals
WELL DEVELOPMENT3umping Air Lift
SAMPLE C
ater Remova
mple Collec
earance
TEMP (°C)
Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
OLLECTION/PURGING
i SUBMERSIBLE PUMP.aaaaaiB*-
i^Tr^J gals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^Jo^
SPECIFICCONDUC- pH
TIVITYTURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
J6.&16.fi/G.tf
jCbLU
Checked By
cx5a G). (pQO/~ r £tfrLp t^.oflm 6.4&94 G.4
^Tv^/L/F/^ *<?,?*
^^ ^^ ^
^% ^\ ^^
fl./G5/cDUS-/-
. •
4<9£.<9447.3^|V pCj.v
"
Date
Version 6- W -04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page of
Well Number
Mw-a-nProject Number Date.
JQ-Ot-OSField Investigator(s)
WELL DATATotal Well Depth _Initial Water LevelWater Column Height / ?IQ . Co r
3 Well Volumes ri^AjTVvO gals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift
Well Diameter _(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", {(=.653 gal/ft"®"?
Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well.
Surging Bailing
gal
Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal lUMP Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes Tic?
Method of Sample Collection
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
440•KJ8 P. 00 455.G
iLaaCoLLl
Checked By Date
Version 6- 14-W
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page 1 of
Well Number
AftV-tf-7)Date
KfrNLANCtlMELL DATA
otal Well Depthnitial Water Level /7£o.i57
Well Diameter T*
A/ater Column Height 7Qt3»4*3
Well Volumes /HiJ/^.Cfl gals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift
(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft@ 2",g(='.653 gal/n @ 4,Well Volume (gals) £p?.v5o
Amount of Water Removed from Well / fiT)
Surging
.gals
Bailing Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal
Method of Sample Collection
hysical Appearance
Remarks
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes
Version 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page 7 of
Well Number
MlV-4-6LTRA
Project
WELL DATATotal Well Depth .Initial Water Level.Water Column Height
3 Well Volumes
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft
Well Volume (gals) fi.4-1
gals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift
Amount of Water Removed from Well 7i jiD
Surging Bailing
.gals
Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal. > I LIMP Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes
Method of Sample Collection '.PUMP
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
COLL zm?.0\ 0.0
mra zoaL 2QS,
Q8SS. t£L ^4Q
Checked By Date
Version 6
1E
1
|
™ \
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Slack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
ro)e£ am£/ . p, / TRA>A( .fc L~£irxlf f^j£~LJ K _ I / / V \
Project Numbe£ ;?rQ Q ^
Field Investigator(s) / * 1 ^~.KFN LANGUM/VELL DATA y ^Qrntal Well Depth / C^y _ _nitial Water LWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF\/ 1
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of Sc
Physical App
Remarks
TIME
1GSS
lG>fi?/64i&7646Itifin
evel /Ojf- QOnHeiaht Y^-^^T
es /I'V'y.e!) aa
WELL DEVELOPMENT3umpinq
SAMPLE C
ater Remova
imple Collecl
earance
s
Air Lift
OLLECTION/PURGING
i ^~)LJ$r'i&fin/ 1
ion OL/ A7^M5
Page / of T .
Well Number
MW-4-I
Well Diameter ~p-(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft (
Well Volume (gals) 4&.51
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
P>L& PUMP'IBL£ PUMP
a 2",Cx=.653 gal/tt @ A".
1 1(5 aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes Qjo)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
w.os74-.fl*/4,WGbL
?/£,
fi?l
<9O4?A9
C7^
7.PJ
?.Q9?. W?./4-
MF/,£
O.<3-QS-o.s-Q4#z?i
(S.7NG,8?Cx9t96.?v9'6-68
/flfir?
W8.?/<906/ 7S.fi
Checked By Date
Version 6- M-M
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
-"reject Name^ ^»_^/ / —r-r-t AACE G&WlCEff LTRA project Numbe^2)447jgf) o/ 4.7
"ield Investigator(s) is— . / *.,<**,, •>KFN LANGUM
WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF
I/
pth rfiRfl 'evel 1] 'Qt\j*J
n Heiaht /TS.Or
d O 1 Oes /T*;c") / . 1*1 aa
WELL DEVELOPMENTDumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
16COICoOfi1C*117fo7?7687foSS
Is
Air Lift
OLLECTION/PURGING
. ftuRMEPSn
Page / of / .
Well Number
MW-4--D
Well Diameter ^p-(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft
Well Volume (gals) 7*^09S 2",(5<=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
Amount of Water Removed from Well rt^ <vO aals
Surging Bailing
3/JF. P/JA/PtonfiuRMEf&anLE PUMP
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (NO)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
l&Sfi~l A* *2^^
7 C^ OO
1 &\ OO
rh^/
4*394£A-4£&
4/84.
??v5??.&??.5?r.s?
WPLE
0.4
-0,5-0.6#/8??
^vSfl
P/8/?/G?!//a
»^ o<^so-^y
7?JS^7^5.77roS.vt5m?
Checked By
Version 6-14-W
Date
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
|•
1
1
1
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page 7 of
Well Number
AfW-^-fljt- • LTRA
Date10-11-05
KPN LANGUMA/ELL DATAotal Well Depth .
nitial Water LevelWater Column Height
Well Volumes
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2".CK653 gal/ft @f 4''
Well Volume (gals) <jL. 7\5
.gals Amount of Water Removed from Well ^R J .gals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTy^* Pumping Air Lift Surging Bailing Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal PUBMERf fBLJ . lUtfP Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes
Method of Sample Collection ^UBME,RsS/flLE. lUMP
hysical Appearance
Remarks
TIME TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
mmZ3£
11 U2S 19Z&£d<:%MPL P.
Checked By Date
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page / of
Well Number
MW-fi-IL.TRA "•""" n447isn.ni. 47
A/ELL DATAbtal Well Depthnitial Water Level
Water Column Height.
3 Well Volumes
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft i
Well Volume (gals) 4#
Amount of Water Removed from Well /CflO .gals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift Surging Bailing Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
SUPlMFJ&lfiLE* PUMP Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (^NoJ
,E PUMPMethod of Water Removal
Method of Sample Collection
Physical Appearance
Remarks
Version 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Pr°*ACF™£EK\/ic!ES LTRA r^d.dJpjPC} c^i 4//^\^ST*!T*'i A-A^/.VVI . T-l
WELL DATA oO/^Tntal Well Depth tfO( J,Initial Water 1Water Colum
3 Well Volurr
METHOD OF
I/
.evel 11 fn HeiohtT
WP
es ftjfc/-CJ °-a|s
WELL DEVELOPMENTDumping Air Lift
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
vlethod of Water Remove
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
H8O142,?Jtffi143?1441
Page / of 7 .
Well Number
MV-vSDate/0~Jm
Well Diameter T" _J(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft
Well Volume (gals) ?\3. GxS'
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
OLLECTION/PURGING
tion SLJBMFJ&/BLE PUMP
@ 2", £=7653 gal/ft @ 4")
14%1 rVJ aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes \No}
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC- pH
TIVITYTURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
1tf£1ffifff.l&ffi1&A8(j&LLA
St (\S* **) £? 'y
434. ?.GG>434- ?.£&43<t ?.ftf
ttfrtMPLEI
/3.40,£-OJ-Q/8
f\~i C c\
?.&&,
?.Q36Sfl6.9fo^-iTo
1853wr.47 ^?Q O
1 ty^ o
Checked By Date
Version 6-K-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name .:£SXTRA
projectNumberO44.^r).o/.4.rField Investigator(s) . , .
KFN LANGUMWELL DATATotal Well Depth '^W
Page / of / .
Well Number
Date/0-/^-G^
Well Diameter j^*Initial Water Level / /^J. 7£3Water Column Heiqht jft.fifA
OO QCZ3 Well Volumes (JfZj .v3C/ qa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT\/ Pumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION
Method of Water Removal vjUfiAl
Method of Sample Collection OL/£
3hvsical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
1PD5/PHB1&1&1&16
1S8K
Is
Air Lift
Am
Well Vc
ount of Wate
Surging
/PURGING
1ERS/BLE PUMP
}M£R£tE>L£ PUMP
(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ftlume (gals) 7Q.»9fi
r Removed from Well
Bailing
m Z'XX=.bb3 qai/ft @ 4 ,
/CO aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes My
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/46&J4.ffi7^ /P
GbLLf
Srfi
fl?fl
v5?v9
V5??
CT&
r!4O?£Q*2 OQ
r-p OQk
VPLE. *
7A9GPP?,b
0,3""fc-i i c\
?4Or!4P,
?4O?.«3fo
5-44
sim&Z1M
£1G>.?
Checked By
Version 6-1 1 -O4
Date
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
1•
1
1•
1
1
1
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page ] of __/ ._
Well Number
MW- C, -1Project Nam
LTRAProject Number Date
Field Investigator(s) LANC^UMWELL DATATotal Well Depth LInitial Water Level.
Well Diameter 41Water Column Height
3 Well Volumes /4-U.Q
i^at (x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2",(x=.b53 gai/tt @ 4^Well Volume (gals) 4<9.G£»
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT\/ Pumping Air Lift
.gals Amount of Water Removed from Well 10O .gals
Surging Bailing Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
&UPMFJ&IBLE. PilMP.
js PUMPMethod of Water Removal
Method of Sample Collection
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes fNoJ
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
joaa Jfi-Ofi Ji22 n&io2a =LJL zoo1D44. -7.4
.MLrhlJt-aT&MPtA
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
**&Ffte*,irm LTRAPraieclNumbefm?^n.o/.4?
--— y^^r^MWELL DATA oo~Total Well Depth f&JA ^Initial WaterWater Colum
3 Well Volurr
evel 7T7.4«n Heiaht / 7i9 . <5£*
es /8l34-. / aa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT\/ Pumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
7Ofiftn%1101110G,11 mma
Is
Air Lift
OLLECTION/PURGING
\SuBMEJ3Sl &L
Page J_ of 1 .
Well Number
MW-G-DDa'e/0-7£-Cfi
Well Diameter 4" I(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft
Well Volume (gals) ?&. O4
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
JE PUMPi\on&UBME&SfflL£. PuptP
S2".£=.653gaim@4".
0°\OLJ aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^^
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
1fi. W7 .4?W.rfW/iP,Ch/L^5
,4/4.4A.9.4/4.4/4=CT£/
P.tfo?.fft?w?.
\MPLE
rfi4•SSfiiOotS (i<3,9.<5*/e?<
Hrffl
r?^a.v9?G,>9/
3^-4T
-aosro/flC.6/?4.?/CK»jS
Checked By
Version 6-1 4 -W
Date
J
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
|
1
1
1
I
• [
1
11111111I11E111
Slack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
> ,NS^wn5S LTRA
ii
LProJBCt Numbsr ^^
r\S^ ^ ^2^^f\ f\ 1 ^J x^
3age / of _J ,
A/ell Number
Mi - ?-5Da7o-ns-a^
Field Investigator(s) . ., ,KZN LANQUM
WELL DATA i J /~\Total Well Deoth /^(Jnitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
.evel IP.S.O^nHeiaht JO.^-1?
es /HLJ.O aa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT\/ Pumping
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of S<
Physical Ap;
Remarks
TIME
1?tfO17531?6?
IfiCtf1809
' SAMPLE C
ater Remova
ample Collec
jearance
Is
Air Lift
OLLECTION/PURGING
\SUPME&SIP>L
Am
A 'IWell Diameter f-
Well Vc
ount of Wate
Surging
j= PUMP .tionSuBMZ&Z/RLEL RjMP.
(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ftlume (gals) ^DjS3
@ 2", (£=.653 qal/ft @ 4"
r Removed from Well /CJCJ aals
Bailing Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (NO)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
R9fi/W..OR/4,o;
(jQLJJ
6/P,?
Co£9
GflP,
acr fix
?W<f?<3S?./?,??^/as
^MPLE #,O7?r
<3Gfl8 138,01
fi-SF!
Q4&&i949v9t!35ft f3^4.(b
Checked By Date
Version 6- 14-CM
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
rOlGCl i*toUlG • •«««•• j»
Ate SERVICES LTRA Project Numb^4pr^^ / ^73
Page_£ of / .
Well Number
MW- ?- 1Date/O-06-0£
:ield Investigator(s) - /KFN LANGUMWELL DATA ^^Total Well Depth / £j(JInitial Water LWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF
\r
evel TJSg. 7n Heiaht CLJ.iJ
es 7 /c~i. /
Pi
ga
WELL DEVELOPMENT3umping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
1(&fi
1G>34-10*391MA1G4G*
s
Air Lift
OLLECTION/PURGING
i \bL/ M£RS7fij(ion \^
Well Diameter ^.(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft (
Well Volume (gals) iQQ.iQ1?@ 2",fc=.652 gal/tt @ 4"
Amount of Water Removed from Well /^jiO aals
Surging Bailing
^E PUMP)UBME#SfBLE. PUMP
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^^
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
13.8874.fl£
/4.4SCbLL£
iSfi/
Gfil
GG£GGft
C.T £h
Checked By
?.4&?.t?4?.c97?<89
*1PL£ ^/P7*?v
S.Of)?A1?.24?./S/
5T-/24-
<348(Di5n/2.u)O£^J Q
(W-?,
Date
Version 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
^Bw/rtfiS LTRApraiectNumbeo^?pn.o/.47'
Page ? of f .
Well Number
MW-V-D!*«vnfirQ5
^^'^KfNLANCiUMWELL DATA o^ QTntal Wftll Depth jyfcj _ _
Initial Water Level 1<3iWater Column Heiaht 7 '^or?!3 Well Volumes ^/(p.^? aa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTI/* Pumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remove
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
7606/GO9/6/a16Kb1G2O16££
Is
Air Litt
Well Diameter <^-(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft
Well Volume (gals) ?P JRQ@ 2". e=.£S5 qal/ft ^5} 41!
Amount of Water Removed from Well / FZ*3 qals
Surging Bailing
OLLECTION/PURGING
\SLJBMEJ3SIBLB PUMP .
«onSuP>MERZfBL£ PUMP
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ffio}
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/4r?D
ffiOP,1fi. 1 1IS 1G>COOUE
4,004^4-Wfi424-
;CT f>A
?.&.?,4P,?.4fi?.4d>
MPLE #Z7(
?.W,?W?.&?,?.$nfi-fl?,
3SCL&\W«P>
flW.Cn3%fl
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page / of
Well Number
MW-fi-SL.TRA
WELL DATA r ,Total Well Depth /(.Initial Water LevelWater Column Height
3 Well Volumes /O.LQ
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2".Cc=.653 gal/ft @ 41
Well Volume (gals) (\
.gals Amount of Water Removed from Well .gals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTy/^ Pumping Air Lift Surging Bailing Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal: ; I LIMP Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes
Method of Sample Collection \ • PUMP
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
1345A36O1<3ffiMOD
/4Q9
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/GTfifa ff?1G>j85JGfl?CbLLE
66O6(506co56(35crr^
?.o/?.o/r?00
MP/.E
1.G>-O.fo"7,0-1.1** ^^j i i
G>.?8CQ.CQ!
(545(S.5G)15- ?
/as,?139.?&DIASH3
Checked By Date
IBlack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
3roject Name—/ACE KERI//C
Field Investigator(s) >*r\£
r£S/,7ENJL4
"M/S/T5//M
proieaNumbeh44^nn7.4-7'WELL DATA }O£?Total Well Depth l\$Q _.
Page 1 of / .
Well Number
MW-fi- 1Date/o-/P,-m
Well Diameter ^-Initial Water Level 7/R7 S6Water Column Heiqht "^3.(Y^
3 Well Volumes / *fc "J . CJ aa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTV Pumping
Is
Air Lift
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal O/_/$A^E/5£$7f?
Well Vc(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ftlume (gals) 4- . G3
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
)LE PUMPMethod of Sample Collection &UBME:JR&IP)LE> PilMP
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
7?4477%tt779&'57£CD1AQ57fl/£78/4
<a2",Ct=.653qal/ft@4"
/«OL) aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes .^^
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/fl.%
7f9.097^09W.ORi22LL£CbL/js
rtTftP,G/8firtfi4-(ft&3
;cr^/£T&
f^W^.75tan?.ao
MPL£.MPLP.
0.,9?.4-/.Ga .a*&ft*P,7?
6,Tg??^G.rG?G.??W-4fifi-4ft
/\%37GO?/Gv8.3«W.ff
-rn
Checked By Date
Version 6-M-W
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name -v .-,— « / -r-r-» A]Ac!P. SERVICES LTRA Project NumtoQ^4.p5rj QJ jf
Field Investigator(s) ., iKFN LANGUM
WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF
y'
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of Sz
Physical App
Remarks
TIME
7?!3&]?£G/?rD
T?ff?^*?4(*\
nth £$9evel /SS.rtiiSn Heiqht /7G).7?R
es fdfjtf. CJ aa
WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
SAMPLE C
ater Remova
jmple Collec
earance
Is
Air Lift
OLLECTION/PURGING
i hUPMErftfil &[
Page / of rWell Number
MW-ft-D
Well Diameter ^r*(x) (height) x=.163qal/ft
Well Volume (gals) ?fo. ^S
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
UE PUMP.tonSuBME&filRLF, PfJMP
-
®2",€=.653qal/ft@4"
i^_) qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes 0^
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
\15££1/vS'.PTolfi.851530£QUJ
439
4£®4?9rrr
?.4£?4O?.33?.33
Wft,f,
-rS.fi-£?-5,3"^J^LD.u f^^f
?.5S?.5Q?.&[?.33
^-49
7?/.<51?fi^1??9f?A1
Checked By
Version 6-14-O4
Date
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
iii
i
i1
1[E
i-
1• \
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Slack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
P'0%c?&(S£RV!C'.eX LTRAField Investigator(s) .^
i/VELL DATATotal Well Denitial Water LWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OFV
pth / rvjp T
evel 7/o3.- y.
Project ^^-^ . O T . 4.T3
LAA/^/M
Page 1 of 7
Well Number
DateJO-fHW/O-73-Q<5
/f '/Well Diameter *+-
n Height f?-^
es /<S.,9 aa
WELL DEVELOPMENTDumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
•^ f ~\ t T ^^
Remarks 1 fcj" 1 C
DATE.TIME
7/A9/iSO*
rpjA/iRf(5
TEMP (°C)
OLl
,£ion
_£A
s
Air Lift
(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft (Well Volume (gals) &.CoiC>
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
.ECTION/PURGING
JJRMFJ&IRLE. PL IMp '
FlUHMFJlRIRi£ PUMP
?OULfif\hT
fiOME. /JS^SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH
3} 2", &=.653 gal/ft @ 4
aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes 0 °)
PUMP WITH IVnnED /< yTURBIDITY
TFER c]feFW.Ov
5ei//fl FZ/MP Ow /o-w-n'oDO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/9QTo
7£GfiI0Q&D
£/. H9ChoJ
A94flS3
^m
flQ^^C T o>
Checked By
7! 35?.£&,
?.&?,WPLf
7(5 P-0,7
13D.fii ^i> i
AflRAor
?? 7C?&&
77D..9/ron.foASR?
«
Date
Version 6- 14-W
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name -^ .4f»- iCfeewrKS /.TEA Project Number ^^^ ^
Field Investigator(s) ,AfeN / wAMS/ /M
WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OFv^
pth A;AVevel 7/^4-. QG>nHeiaht <> .7J4
es 4o.l J qa
WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
flflfltf
O9LSSQq fi
/ jGi ^T^*l
1CC£.
Is
Air Lift
OLLECTION/PURGING
i QL]BME-R&lPiL.
Page / of / .
Well Number
MW-Q-I™e10-11-Cfi
A "Well Diameter *7-(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2",^=.653 gal/n @ 4"
Well Volume (gals)i
Amount of Water Removed from Well _£_
Surging Bailing
E RjMP .
\onSu fiMFf&IP>l£ PlJMP
DCV^LJL*X_/ aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^No}
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
74 'rCo
14-8214J>&
14.81CfajP
L594
A9?flSW539CT^
206r'O??!09
•/«/:*
Ov9"/.fl"7-?-/.?
'P,??ft
^/5fi6,9/86.5D6./??-i3S
£¥)££9/O/SPA 6/S8G.7
Checked By Date
IVersion 6-14-04
I
1E
1
'
|\
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
'ACF i fefiMrtfiff LTRAProject Number ^»
KE.N LANGI IMA/ELL DATA OQ/"Tntal Well Depth (O^D,nitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF\/
_evel f^7.\j5n Heiaht TQS.Of)
es fTi 1 1 . C aa
WELL DEVELOPMENT3umping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
1O09101$,JO /Co70/80
TOP.?
Is
Air Litt
Page / of /
Well Number
MW-9-DDate/o- / i-m
Well Diameter ^- _j(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft
Well Volume (gals) /3O. Q&i
Amount of Water Removed from Well f
Surging Bailing
OLLECTION/PURGING
\£>UBMER$IBL£ PUMP.
ton&JBME-RS/RLEi PjJMP
® 2",cc=.b!j"J qaim (ffl 4 j
GLflO aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^^
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
W091fi 1ftIfi. KQft, /Co£&LL£
^5//8^fijg
S/flv5Wcr $A
_?<3£r!A9^L%
?.i%MPLF.
iQ.G-J.fi-/.?-/.<§^/8r^
?3??tsn2 **3/~
^L 0
_?.Cft9^S-fl9
JS1&1/SH9O;qqv
MSlft
Checked By Date
Version 6-1 4 -04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Xt^SfeRix/raFsr LTRAField Investigator(s) **
r\EN LANGLJMProject Numbe^ -J^ ; ^
WELL DATA / >»X"\Total Well Depth I^J ..Initial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
.evel A!y A^pnHeiaht ^Q.^tfi
es /<Cj.COCj aa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT\X* Pumping
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of S;
Physical App
Remarks
TIME
*/ /**** ^Y*£
7 C"\^J Y
l&tti1SGQ
7A547558
' SAMPLE C
ater Remova
ample Colled
jearance
s
Air Lift
OLLECTION/PURGING
i £>L/BM£33£l&l
Page 7 of t .
Well Number
MM- 11-8
xf '/Well Diameter *7-(x) (height) x=.163 gal/tt
Well Volume (gals) 4-<S7
Amount of Water Removed from Well «
Surging Bailing
£,BUMPion fiL/fi fF/ s/fiLE POMP
@> 2",(x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
Qt<J>*J qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes QJO)
TEMP (°C)
SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
I(Q(J\J/V?.v9?.
16.15ic. erf/o.07>
718?PO^AJLJ
?i85crSU
?79^^ 4 ^*
?/GMPLE
SQ
7490~/2.4*/PAfl
RS5?81?.SG>?.£*?
5-4-7
Jftbfo7fiO.Co
IftP.fl1£O8
Checked By
Version 6-14-CW
Date
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1•
I
1
1
1E
1
|* \
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
iiiiii
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
% .'3feewrasf LTRA
Page / of 1 .
Well Number
MW-11-IProiec'Numbeh447 .o/.4.? Date/o-rp-m
Field Investigator(s) /x_. . / AKI^, /A//
/VELL DATATotal Well Denitial Water LWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF
V I
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of SE
Physical App
Remarks
TIME
7oWm9/4O5/4Q974. ///4-/v?
pth fifhJLJ
evel 7«4.1JHnHeiaht (jfi-Co1?
es /^jtltVP aa
WELL DEVELOPMENTDumping
SAMPLE C
ater Remova
imple Collec
earance
s Am
^r Lift
Well Diameter ^(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft (
Well Volume (gals) 4 .o8g2",&=.653qal/ft@4"
ount of Water Removed from Well /CJCJ aals
Surging Bailing Other
OLLECTION/PURGING
i SURMEJ&I&LE PUMPion SUBMERSI BLE PUMP
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^o)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
!W133?tftiR/6.00£CLU
rgnflCiOf?,GOB(TcGS
XTTiS
?/y?,?w,?,<%>,?.£&
\MPLE
/.p,-/.x?-/.<S-1.8#(R?J
rp/ ?,G.?,9r9.?f«?6.7S-4,
7W.47^O/as.?MO
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
y^^/ei/fttM LTRAProiopt Kli imh^r ^ &h-roject Numoec- j . jp _ ^^ v^
L^rr*T-i ^LLJ.LJ/ . T-I
Page 7 of / .
Well Number
MW-I1-DDate/n-/p-Q5/Lv //C \^J
F.eldlnvest.gator(s)^£^ i^ANGUM
WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water LWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF
V
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of Sc
Physical App
Remarks
TIME
74 W
W&14fR
/44O
pth *^f\Ppvel "1^7. &{•
n Height 7/1.^/0
es PJfi.3 oa
WELL DEVPumping
SAMPLE C
ater Remova
ample Collec
earance
ELOPMENT
s
Air Litt
OLLECTION/PURGING
i &UPMPR&IE
Well Diameter ^»(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft @ 2",§T=.653 gal/tt @ A'[
Well Volume (gals) r^.rt^
Amount of Water Removed from Well / rCJ aals
Surging Bailing
MJ5 PLfMP
tan&JWIFRSlFZLE PUMP
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (NO)
TEMP (°C)
SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
If) 99IS. 91ICoOj*w mlCbuj
47?4A*)46G>4?£rr^
?i%
^^?.v*50pt.T)
WP/,£
5S
"Aft
~/.v9^/8?r
?4^?.4W?48?!A9
^-46
MA7r?9.O
1G9JL
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Well Number
Lh~t- 42.Dale
ZQrA/ELL DATAotal Well Depth _nitial Water LevelWater Column Height «H.«!
Well Volumes / IT . L£
//Well Diameter
(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", .653 gal/n @ 4"Well Volume (gals) t^).
.gals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
. gals
Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal SUBMERSIBLE. PtJMP
Method of Sample Collection *OilBMEJR&l &L£ l^Uf^P
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes .
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
1490 Start Pumping
14& 02. ZZ.TML 1£& ££&
-(].? ?.LI-CT t
( *£Z
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-tM
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
PK%?fiJ?£«l//fTfiSi LTRA Project NumberQ^^gQf Q / ^
WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water LWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF»xMETHOD OF
Method of W
Method of Sz
Physical App
Remarks
TIME
/<3/?K&87
1Co31
if Ortl(£(jj
pth f ^ f l l .„evel 1\j(pj GlTn Height »5^--£^^
es /CXOr r qa
WELL DEVELOPMENTDumping
SAMPLE C
ater Remova
imple Collect
earance
s
Air Lift
Page / of / .
Well Number
MW-1P.-I^tQ-lfi-CF)
Well Diameter ^.(n) (height) x=.163 gal/ft (
Well Volume (gals) A . L^
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
OLLECTION/PURGING
\ SUBMERSIBLE PUMP^SUBMERSIBLE PUMP
g2"^X=. 653 gal/ft @ 4"
c w gals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes fity
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/<%/
WflTn
1963&LU
fGG
4954^9
0^ O1^?
M Q /-
r!i38*^ oo
WflUE
/. /
-Q,(o-/.?"SO;#£?
L'^^-'*"v
>
8.0?^^ ^^S ^ \
^^ ^^* ^^^
?.64rft-6G
/se.r£345i85/.?PA9.6
Checked By
Version 6-14-W
Date
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
|V
1
|
1
1
1
IIE
1111111111111111
Slack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
™^cfc&ERViC!E£ LTRA Project "un*"fyfafflQ£Jt 43
Field Investigator(s) . - /
A/ELL DATA Or Afntal Well Depth <TpfO <7*rV^
Page 7 of
Well Number
1^11/V"!/1Date/o- /
1
^~~D
Well Diameter ^nitial Water Level TyS^-QQ.Water Column Heiqht /Q&.QO
3 Well Volumes <pOf rG> aals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTI/' Pumping Air Lift
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
7C^O1G)4G>1G£D/GfiQ)/ftM1?03
Well Vo(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft (lume (gals) (e&>/P.1
®2",g=.653qal/ft@4")
Amount of Water Removed from Well / jLJLJ aals
Surging Bailing
OLLECTION/PURGING
i £uP>M&R£t&LJ~ RjMp
HonSuBMFRSIPiLF. PlU^P
-
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^c^
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC- pH
TIVITYTURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
IS. 7?fofift16 D1fto.0£fhuue
v JV.A- 1 ( . CvLJ
O/"S f-^ ^J *
OO*"0 **^ S\ "1
OQx* ^^ /4 j^
CT &LE
1
4.9-/.£-0,9-/.<8ifi?3??
?.6£?.4fl?!S5?.54»
o-GI
QfV- /I^nLo.>
i3CRv9fl/iBQ
Checked By Date
Version 6- 14 -O4
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name ,f\La- jCs~ vlt£ *>
Project Number
Page _j| of
Well Number
/]/|| /^ /? /
Date/O -Ob-OS
Field Investigator(s)~T. , f^e-<J
WELL DATA . u < ,Total Well Deoth 11 b . Gt>
;/• //
Well Diameter 7Initial Water Level I ^ ^ - ^VWater Column Heiaht
3 Well Volumes qals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT^ Pumping Air Lift
\
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal *^tl/ 'itv u?o fi/^
Method of Sample Collec
Dhysical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
['}'. ^
h .-\nf.f . ->v-
1 d ' / *
1 \ \ — J U
11 \ ^
Wl\\\w
A1' ^i
Well Vc(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"lume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well n qals
Surging Bailing
? rv^^Hlion A1 , 'Y r C' f> <sfi\ ^^
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (No/
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
m r/ i J
Is.n1 D , /) 3
n.s-s(7.f7n,/74/^/c
-
77/^/ / \f
( i *J 'O
8K0 /5
9/Vf ?V
"1,^
~7,^0
7)61U7./r
7C- ^ < ^/
fl^l
^7, £77O7-^J7.r^
fu<A
)l#o\~1&O\U\£
/7^-"iI7gj
/l?,ff* ' M\\1
A'lb
Checked By Date
Version 5-14-O4
111
111111111111111
Slack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
P^S?aSF l /CBS LTRAProject Numbej^^y?r^ ^QJ <tf>
A/ELL DATAFotal Well Denitial Water LWater Coium
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF
I/ F
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of SE
Physical App
Remarks
TIME
76067v5O9/6H-151?ftfflO
Page 1 of f .
Well Number
Date/0-0^-GB
pth rtjCjLD . Well Diameter nf*PVPI /T»7 A3i Height (j)4-.4«t
PS /rt"ilp. / aa
WELL DEVELOPMENTDumpinq
s
Air Lift
SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
atp.r Removal \DUBMEf\Sl fy
(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft (Well Volume (gals) 4*ft O
Amount of Water Removed from Well J_
Surging Bailing
L£ PL/HPmpio rniiprtion O^/tJri/SrO-7/j9 iJ5 iLJrlP
earance
g 2". £T653 gal/ft @43I
UL^LJ aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^o)
SPECIFICTEMP(°C) CONDUC-
TIVITY
pH TURBIDITY DO ORP WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
P/ W 4/7wQAI>/. /a ixi -7aaffl 46?
»fc04 47\9
5.<5GA&K)s.r?
8.34-Q.338. S?A/S???S-{
/5QS2i(2QcA3
GCA.Coj)
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
*J$i?.F?&PR\/lC£& LTRA f*VLA *2£)f*\ C\ 1 d*2VJTS*T- I /CA-/. LJ / . *T- f
Field lnvest,gator(s)^^ /^/x/G/JM
WELL DATA o r gTotal Well Depth rtiC$OInitial Water LWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OFV
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of SE
Physical App
Remarks
TIME
744?WiO7453/4t567^53WO 7
.evel /4^3-«p5n Height J<ri7.CX5
es rti")f . / qa
WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
s
Air Lift
SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
ater Removal SilElM^RSl P)l
Page 7 of 7 .
Well Number
MW-JS-D
-
/i //Well Diameter <T-
(x) (height) x=.163 qal/ft (Well Volume (gals) f^Q 04*
Amount of Water Removed from Well _j
Surging Bailing
J5.P/L/MP
imple Collection&/flM£KS7fiL£ PiJHP
earance
g 2", £=.653 gal/ft @ 4^,
fil rC_/ qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^o)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
ia.tf18.88J&&3./a.?s£hLLI
45/8^f (^^ilffi
4<3&4LQ7^
Co.30G 01(5.80
AMFLJF
•(L3tC0LJ<9.4/VV.VJk^J
/3 O/"*
i5^SL^^Q
fiflS. ?AQPQ
^/SrrvS"^
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-01
1[
1• •1111111111111111
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name ./V 6 ^ 7il r i/Jc e<7
ProgctL
Field Investigator(s) ,~Z- • Lt^i^/
WELL DATATotal Well Deptnitial Water Le\Water Column \
3 Well Volumes
h 7 r '/el M V 7 7 'Heiqht
aa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT"^ Pumping
s
Mr Lift
dumber4710
Page / of -U
Well Number
Date ,•
Well Diameter 4(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2",
Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well / Cj ft
Surging Bailing/ *-
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal D^ffat/^ Hdi / /L/
Method of Sample Coiled
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
• • ''(T U
\ ! A -)n+1\ \ T, |
11135I I (,~V1H)LI1ll'A
">/
i
ion /^\,^f •) p </ f ti ,\~.f.' /
\ ~l 1 /(<d 1 , J L~/ '^^
wyO >" U^
/tk
x=.653 gal/tt @ 4"
i qals
Other
'was Well Pumped Dry? Yes /No)
1
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
5.5\
1C .£'3
I6,<fl| t ,&7I t .&o4/ir^
Checked By
7)171/
•304fcO'7
8/ I^77$
7«7,n7.14"7JM
IH--^7 Of)/lt£>
0f/
R.S2d.sftfl.^oQ.tf
^
^7.1
V]3.^
101,7fi?,l
I6^,r
1 ,17'
)
/uy
W
VJy
/
Date
/'}&J
,
\J/
Version 6- 14 -CM
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page 7 of
Well Number
LTRA ""AD-OKI*
WELL DATA ~Total Well Depth *&Initial Water LevelWater Column Height
3 Well Volumes 7l J / . \J
4//
(x) (height) x=._163 gal/ftWell Volume (gals) ~ ""*
= .163 gal/ft@ 2",£=.653 gal/ft^3.715
gals Amount of Water Removed from Well .gal
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift Surging Bailing Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal UBMEJ IRL /L/MP
Method of Sample Collection^
Physical Appearance
Remarks
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes OJ<^
TIME TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
nags Start Pumping
ca^2?4.G8I4fi2 6ft?,
;'
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-O4
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page 7 of / .
Well Number
MW-JS-8vfi LTRA
Field Investigator(s)
VELL DATAotal Well Depth _
nitial Water LevelA/ater Column Height. 1C
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=.163gal/f;.
Well Volume (gals) /O
Well Volumes .O qals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift
Amount of Water Removed from Well / C\~)
Surging Bailing
aals
Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal PtJMP
Method of Sample Collection
Physical Appearance
Remarks
SUE>MEJKSlBLE PilMP
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes
TIME TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
1213.J2JS ao2.
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
A^Ssw/cfos LTRA Project NumberQ -)gQ Q ? ^
me&'gaors /<EN LANGUMWELL DATA O -f OTotal Well Depth *"/-7o
Page / of / .
Well Number
AW-W-IDale7O-o4--Qg
1Well Diameter ^. |
Initial Water Level 7*50, GT*Water Column Heiaht (5)«i.<3G>
3 Well Volumes I^Jf\.J.f\.j pa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT\/ Pumping
s
Air Lift
(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft <Well Volume (gals) 4O.T/S
@ 2",6c=.B53 gal/ft @ 4'J>
Amount of Water Removed from Well j£jT\_j aals
Surging Bailing Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal SlJfiMEJ3£l fiLF. PlJMP Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (NO)
Method of Sample CQllectionOL/BM£Ri.S>/6L£ PlJMP
3hvsical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
1683KM?
17Q57rt)9/?/£
TEMP (°C)
SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/Cp.CJiSAS.3S"f fc? **3C^
/^.7 • «- v
GbLus
4<i8r*l (j)
^L /Q
^?v9
?.&{
?.43?.S/RP./84-
CT &L&
Av^?S 338.31
v5-fii
$39 /<39G>.?^WO.044>9?
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
1if1IB -
\
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Slack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Ack &ERVIC&S LTRA O44?£0. 0 /. -f ?Field Investigator(s) .* /
K?N L.ANGUMA/ELL DATArotal Well Denitial Water LWater Columr
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF\X F
pth fl"A>P \evel 7»5>S-'3icLi Heiaht Tl^.'?^
Page / of 7 .
Well Number
MW-lfi-DDa'e/0- Ofi-OK
Well Diameter tf*(x) (height) x=.163gal/tt^
Well Volume (gals) 7^4, ,3S
esj\^v»r*.Cj qals Amount of Water Removed from Well
WELL DEVELOPMENTDumping Air Lift Surging Bailing
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collect
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
GS59Q904-0909
O91G
DLLECTION/
GUBMPURGING
£H5/BL£ PUMP
V&&IBLE PUMP
}> 2",^. 653 gal/ft @ 4"
OW qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^N )
TEMP(°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
74ft?
7v5,i9£Jtf.4O
4864&Q
4G^_^54
'CT o/3
7.SR?,90
?.A9MPLS */8??
£63
?.Coi9
?.G??.Gfi
>£•_ O
&t£.fi3454^JT\J*fiLl
04_Q Cf
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
s? LTRA . 07.4-7
WELL DATA f ,Total Well Depth /> rx ^-/\Initial Water I PVR! /4^-yPWater Column Height
3 Well Volumes
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=.163 gal/n @ 2",£^.653 gal/ft @ 4*
Well Volume (gals) /POS
gals
mop iMETHOP OF WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
gals
Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal. PUMP Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (NO
Method of Sample Collection E.
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME TEMP(°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
zaoi H£9 ma.Tim
rr SAMPLE
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
1• [i1
1•
111111111111111
Slack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
y^yfpgyifipg [ ^-pA Project Numbe^ /Q ) fQJm4?
WELL DATATotal Well Denitial Water I
Water Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF\x
nth £75
evel l4rft Qi£n Heiqht ?1 .\3$
es 7l"5,y. C qa
WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remove
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
nfifi/7A9"1 14iP11451143775?
Is
Air Lift
OLLECTION/PURGING
i bUBMEJISIl
Page 7 of f .
Well Number
MW-16-IDate/o-nro-o^
Well Diameter ^f-(x) (height) x=.163qal/tt
Well Volume (gals) 4^0. 0m
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
BLf.Pt.IMP
uon flUPiMERS/BLEL PUMP
@2",[x=.653gal/tt@4"
^rO aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes QNo}
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/4.A974.GO14. C&14.81
COLLE
_4&L
46x94-7O4^5
?i3£>?. i9P,?.JO?.iff?
MFLE #/S?r
A<7ft.3Co
8.\35S OQ
t ^A^
}vlo- 7fi
s333jQ.£18.4<j^4v934-?./S
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page of
Well Number
MW-1G-Dg? LTRA . 4?
WELL DATATotal Well DepthInitial Water Lev<Water Column Height
3 Well Volumes
T3SL
Well Diameter _^_^_^___(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2",(x=.653 gal/ft @ 4*
Well Volume (gals) £?4-. 1S
.gals Amount of Water Removed from Well aals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift Surging Bailing Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal *jLjE2>M£rfi£lBLJE. F UMP Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes
Method of Sample Collection <OLIBME&Sl O/L/S lUMP
Version 6-
111•• -
111111111111111
Mack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name . -.-,-, .A^JF. SeRviCFfi LTRA -rojec. Numbe^^Q^n J ^
F eld Investigator(s) . . /KEN LANC-.UM
A/ELL DATAfotal Well Denitial Water Li/Vater Columr
3 Well Volum
METHOD OFF
pth /OOevel 7\5/. G'?i Heiaht Gj.v^L^
es //"Ty. ifvJ pal
WELL DEVELOPMENTDumping >
METHOD OF SAMPLE C(
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collect
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
77v%1 *"yv^/ ^^\*-/\*~J
/^^L JT^J
1 "y*\/^
//CA^"! P
s Am
Mr Lift !
Page 7 of __1 .
Well Number
AW- 17-S
A f(Well Diameter ^«(x) (height) x=.163 c
Well Volume (gals) 4-. 7v1al/ft (i
aunt of Water Removed from Well _l
Surging Bailing
DLLECTION/PURGING
SuPMEF&lBLE PUMP
\onfluBMEKSlRLF. PUMP
i) 2" £- 653 q"al/n (fc *
£)£Q^ aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes U^o)
DR/LJJNG CREW WA& Pi IMPING A LITTLE AIR. DmNnrWANT BURN PUMPTEMP (°C)
SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
IA.&COya.saW.OO
aw
8Slcrr^SX/
££S1 • rX^Av j
' O ^
t £?7*£
a.4*sa/88
1-77
V359.0v3SR.3G&?
Checked By Date
Version 6- It-Qt
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page _]_ _ of
Well Number
M\N- 17- TLTRA
projec,
Field Investigator(s)LANQUM
£'WELL DATATotal Well Depth .Initial Water LevelWater Column Height,
3 Well Volumes 7Q4-.LO gals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT\/ Pumping Air Lift
"Well Diameter(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2",<%^.653 gal/ft @
Well Volume (gals) i34..<9(7>
Amount of Water Removed from Well / Mj
Surging Bailing
. ga
Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal^.
Method of Sample Collection V,SuaMERS/BUE. PUMP.
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (No
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
I1ZL Start Pumping
1135 a.so74..G4 &&£
74.89 68,9^JC
Checked By Date
Version 6-1
111• -
1\
111111111111111
Mack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name . ___- .ACE SERVICE LTRA"ield Investigator(s) . . .
/<£N LANGUMA/ELL DATAfotal Well Denitial Water LAbater Columr
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF\/ F
Pth £(p5evel /v^rtj.*??T Height / 7(ti.^fi3
es /380.G) qal
WELL DEVELOPMENTDumping /
s
\ir Lift
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal \D(JBMEJ3SlBL
Project Numbeb44^£OO 7 ^
Page ) of ^ .
Well Number
MW-1?-D
A "Well Diameter *f-(x) (height) x=.163gal/f
Well Volume (gals) ^.9 ^^
Amount of Water
Surging
.js PUMPMethod of Sample Collection SilBMEfZiSl RLE PilMP.
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
143G>7440
7W/44fl
Removed from Well
Bailing
Kffi 2". £=.653 aal/ft ) 4"
7 fvO qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes QNoJ
TEMP(°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
A5.G8
iaa
COLL!
459
44?4T*7
*CT&
?.G3?.58>?.5R?.5C*
MPL£,1 II K_>K•i
j.
Checked By
^/8?<
<9.6Oftv^7(S^.At94W-/P,
35ft CoflTWfl
5RS.i9389,£
Date
Version 6- 14-O4
Black & Veatch
PAf?£^Ef>.Field lnvestigator(
WELL DATATotal Well DepthInitial Water LevelWater Column He
3 Well Volumes
Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
//rt5ff LTRA Project Numbef)44-^ Q/ qy
Page / of / .
Well Number
MW-Jft-f!°aKfo-nfi-cfi
s) Afew LANGUM7o54 7^3
aht /£.<S5
rtJlj.Oy qals
i r\r-\/i-i y\nn AC-KIT
Well Diameter ^f-(x) (height) x=.163 gal/tt @ 2", £=.653 gal/tt @ 4"
Well Volume (gals) ?*.,9^
Amount of Water Removed from Well C0O aals
Pumping Air Lift Surging Bailing Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal SUBMERSlBLE, PUMP
Method of Sample Collection SUfiMl^RSlRLE PiJMP
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
1511IfiffiA5/s9
WSfo
7 flQ
TEMP(°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
7ft.(To/fi ,6?
J?fiBH LLf
flfo/a?<s<^?(o
<S90•CTffJ
r!i9/?.<8R?.//6.S?
MPLE */8?'
A7?RA?«J^O j^j^j^^^\ ^ ~^ 7 <*
S.Q9P5-A9
u8a<s4-74.74fl?,£^55,8
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
1[E
1
I• \
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
31ack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
P^F.8S«a//cM LTRA Project Numbe£)44p^£
Field Investigator(s) .,, ,KFN LANQUM
A/ELL DATA OOfTotal Well Depth xfa$J
nitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
.evel 7«n Heiqht (*
-vQ1 .^K
es J4O.O aa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT\/ Pumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
/7WT17091?1ftWIG*7?/an7?/a4
s
Air Lift
OLLECTION/PURGING
i <SUBME&£lt
J.O/.4.?
Page / of / .
Well Number
MW-1fi-I\
Well Diameter ^* |(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft <
Well Volume (gals) 4/j> faS*
Amount of Water Removed from Well _/
Surging Bailing
1LE PUMP•^SUBMERSIBLE PUMP
g2",£=.653gal/tt@4l
OQC\ IOaLJ aals
Other 1
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes C^O
TEMP(°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/,50?A*?. /<?,Iff. / 1/tf.//Cb j
ftffl
i5£9iSSSi580
:CT &
?3CL • v j^v^J
^^4 ^^^^^
r!<50WflUF;*(8?
8AK8.4-184-1A40
47J9.0^c4f
^•
!£,o./oa/
Checked By Date
Version 6- 14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
P»?W/rF.<? LTRA'mmb"044.?m.ni.4-?
Page / of L
Well Number
MW-18-DDate/0-Q^
"*"»-***>» &„ L4HGUMWELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF
\/
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of Si
Physical App
Remarks
TIME
1G4916fi&1&55;&qa/?nr/KM
Pth £&5.evel 1*5nHeiaht T
ft-Sfi-'0.45
es ^j/Co. nr qa
WELL DEVPumping
• SAMPLE C
ater Remove
ample Collec
earance
ELOPMENT
Is
Air Lift
Well Diameter ^*(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft
Well Volume (gals) ftS. 7 A@ 2",0T=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
Amount of Water Removed from Well fij&J aals
Surging Bailing
OLLECTION/PURGING
i SUBMERSIBLE PUMPtion SUBMERSIBLE PUMP
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes Qto)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
AT.,3?,**) £?
i&asffirftf-£tOLLt
<fr<94flP,4?>9<f?<S
•err iS
P.r9/?. e?.v*)7?^4r
WPLE *ff?
A.OP,fl-ffCtfteft8.S2,?fi- 14
f^.O^on^4rfiR,<S
f,(S
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
1• i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
P%C£.a&EffViC,£S LTRA Project NumberQ^^^Q Q/ ^
Field Investigators) _^ / ANGL/M
WELL DATA , ,-y, ,Total Well Depth l^fyj
Faqe / of _LWell Number
Ofl-7-S
Well Diameter ^f»nitial Water Level /S6r^4*
Water Column Heiqht <3.&£>
3 Well Volumes f , f^t aa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT\/ Pumping
Is
Air Lift
Well Vo(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ftlume(gals) P..9S
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal &L IRMEJ3SI&LE PUMP
Method of Sample Collection OLJBMERfil B/JS. PilMP
Physical Appearance
Remarks 1
TIME
/O46>
ICtfO
lOtt/o^fo//no1103
3fajLD
g 2"jQc=.653 gal/tt @ 4"
aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes io^
A/or PUMP WITH IA/OOFTER CRFW. LRFVIG FbRTAP>L£,TEMP (°C)
SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH
PUMPTURBIDITY DO ORP
JSED KEJTH
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
r*\ *f r^^^
A9.CW1 Q ^fO
YQ ^JCC
CfaLur
4/G
411
XT fa
r^o?.&?
?,ff?
MPLE
/A?7.G
/2. //8,S
^/ft??<
G.5STQ.?^
6.G8G.71
CT» CTc^
£D9fi/acfift-80R.O
Checked By Date
Version 6-K-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
P^a$r*\/irtS LTRA
PageJLof_L |
Well Number
OB- /-I 1P,oJea m4?/?n_0/_ 4r 'vo-n?^
™*~»**} Km LANGUM 1WELL DATATotal Well De>nth 1c4h Well Diameter 4" 1Initial Water Level 1PA.Q5
Water Colum
3 Well Volurr
METHOD OFy
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of S
Physical App
Remarks
TIME
11 Snrr/Qf77£77A9711M7740
nHeiaht fVo.aS
es A")/. / aa
' WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
Is
Air Lift
: SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
ater Removal £UE>M£R£lB
(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft S^fc^esagai/ftO'TjWell Volume (gals) 4&.'f*1 \
Amount of Wafe
Surging
LE PL/A/Pamp!* Collection SUBME&Sl ftL£ PUMP
jearance
r Removed from Well /doLJ aals
Bailing Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^oj
SPECIFICTEMP(°C) CONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
1fiPC) i«0MAI S49tfAK v.9 ,9/5P.9.54SChi :cr ^
r^r?.<???.&)?.35
MPLE W?
r!,*??r^sTo??W^vH
I'l-rRS
477.04/<S.O4fi70fO.!6!
Checked By Date
•
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
•
1Version e-K-OI
1
1[E
1
•
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Mack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
ny^Jfegyfiffg LTRA Project "^(yfAprftfi]^
NELL DATArotal Well Denitial Water LWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF
I/ F
pth pf. Tj 5•\ Height TCY^Tll
es /wO'-*' qa|
WELL DEVELOPMENT3umpinq
METHOD OF SAMPLE C<
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collect
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
/Q«5<jL
11CO110511QS111ft
s Am
<\ir Lift
Page _/ of 7 .
Well Number
os-1-n
Well Diameter ^.(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft (
Well Volume (gals) (ir'.iSS
ount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
3) 2".fx=.653 qal/ft @> 4"
f L^J aals
Other
DLLECTION/PURGING
\&URMERSIRL JF. PUMP Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (g)
\0nSu&MER&lP>LF. PUMP
TEMP (°C)
SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/v5.v38i £* O.O
|\*2 1 A_0
75.5?
4-1fi41?
4-1?rrfik
?! 4?.5G>?&*?.AS
^P/jR ^/8??v
r??J9?.7W
??3? ??9
rfi?
kSSftiS
<37Q£3rJ9(^
i'5HSji9
Checked By
Version 6-14-W
Date
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Pr°J A~lf £fV?i//r£S LIRA Project "Umbe[Q£4'%ftO] <tf>
Field lnvest,gator(s) ^ ^ANGLIM
WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water 1Water Colum
3 Well Volurr
METHOD OF
METHOD OF
Method of W
Method of S,
Physical Apf
Remarks
TIME
11JS&11 £R1 Ji3B113?114&.1145
>pth 'tJ^Jc V6I f t^^\~~~ * t ^~ i^
nHeiaht ^L.O7
es f . Co aa
• WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
: SAMPLE C
ater Remova
ample Collec
>earance
s
Air Lift
Page 1 of 1 .
Well Number
Date/o-^9-a^
^ //Well Diameter *|»
(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ftWell Volume (gals) /£.(oY
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
OLLECTION/PURGING
i SUBMERSIBLE PUMPuon vSijBNF^qf/BLE Pui^P
-
© 2" £-'653 qal/ft © 4"
aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^oj
Camn NOT PUMP WITH WOOFTER Cfeew^ UGEDKEJTHf?FV Iff PORTABLE. PUMP
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
7<P.4R"f \ ^^^
^^^^ t^^
^}^\ ^^^)
CbLU
?f&?46>?49?4?
5crr6/
?.&1
?.£C)^^\ i^^ ^i
f*J\ ^^\ gl
\ t ^*^-^ •
\MPLE
/8,8-o,t"7.5"I?#£?
A 1??.?n?.4£?.5/
rffi"^
78?. /7roD.cS
7ftJ.O171.?
Checked By Date
Version 6-UO4
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
PlSffi$?pfiwcr&? LTRA rqect um?)^4??a0.07.4.7/OFW LANGUM
WELL DATATotal Well De
Page ^7 of t .
Well Number
(TR"^?r iT^^
nth /oICi . Well Diameter *T*Initial Water Level 1&3 • 4J.Water Column Heiaht <ft£'.\59
3 Well Volurr
METHOD OF
es / KLTf'.LO fla
• WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remove
Method of Sample Collec
3hysical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
O9IgC&1G0.930
092? \0332.
Well Vo(x) (height) x=.l§3gal/tt(lume(gals) 4-7. 5/S
Is Amount of Water Removed fr
Air Lift Surging !
OLLECTION/PURGING
i &JBMER3/BL.E PUMPtion SilRMFJlg/BLE PuMP
om Well
Bailing
g 2",(5(=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
//O^) aals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes No)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
(r~-f\\J
14&RHGA74 6&CbLU
£r*OC>
^•TQO
5S9
^p^crfiA
?1G>?.1£,?. Ifi?.££>
^^ f\ f^f"^\ /
T
^?A9S.W?3fi?.A9
[r/35
i?^8O,947° 6L"rto. r040 ^
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-CW
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
rOIGCl iNoljlc * B^^^^K m.
Ar'F &ER\/(C!£fi LIRAProject "™**fa4yjpft .O1.4.?
Field lnvestigator(s)^£^ L^QUM
WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OFv/
Pth jrWp jrj
nHeiaht /Of. 4-1?
/QO Oes l\jC). O qa
WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remove
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
084$ARfinfWtfAQOOQ9Q?
Is
Air Lift
Page 7 of / .
Well Number
Date/o-c•DlA1 t ^ \ 1 "
d n
Well Diameter cf-(x) (height) x=.163gal/ft<
Well Volume (gals) (j/o . jRn
Amount of Water Removed from Well _/
Surging Bailing
OLLECTION/PURGING
i &UBMERSIPLE, PUMP^£u&MERSfBLF. PUMP
@ 2",^=.653 gal/tt @ 4>r
OZ9C v qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^0}
EAZL.Y Mneniuq } £>UNW <3O°
TEMP(°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
<S,CcO
AOffl4.
GQLLfi
4fD
4/s9
413
7T^
7^ dLQ*3 ftv/f
?&??*£
<1PL& TjPf?f?.1
/0.£?70, ft?,;o,o?/O.Ofl
34G>.C0
fl4,9,4-
5^9. fo
Checked By Date
Version 6-14.04
I111
'
11111I111111111
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING
Project Name /\ //4-/.D jH( \s,ut(.i \c^t> ' f i
DATA
Project Numberokm^oField Investigator(s)
"~Z- . ^-^i^jWELL DATA \ \ r - l 'Total Well Depth if X$"
1 /Page I of ' .
Well Number
DateIO-0/ -07
Well Diameter '• )''nitial Water Level f S - 6 i 'Water Column Height
3 Well Volumes ga
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTX Pumping
s
Air Lift
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal Ut/'Wv»\ ^Ro ?>
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
fS"2.lu Tju
IH'^7
^1/M',^N',47K :
/H',^N:<TY
Well Vc(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"lume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well "^^ / & fa i aals
Surging Bailing
UW? Vi
^ i i -ion |! All^fh f^^tf}]^
f)(Av\/?W, Q Jjpi'i, ro(/ i ' i
l*/!H^
1^0'
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (No}>
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTAL
REMOVED
F^°EStart Pumping
/r.to'T, 4 7K,^7HAT1^1/t,UmS6*n^/
V
105
7? /
7^^•>Ho;o)v/on
Wt '>
l')0
L.n6-WC.o,\
&.<t>i(^L^
77 <T- ^s c,
C y ? -^.OH
, 0 4
l - ^ lM0Uq/ , / t
,/lu'w(
Checked By
21U
3tla?3 l 7 ^^,H
^(W
r;oj.g111*
?r^/'9s~(^
°l^t(l
V-lCf r fcir,4^ir,^}
1 1 ( y(/-/
/ AvH
' L/-4
V^'%H
'%:,u/ .
/A'l
Date
V8rsion6-14-W
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name Project Numbero^m ~j}~o
Page J of
Well Number
/T /(_ t/i/^ -- |
Date/o -^6" -^>^"
Field Investigator(s) ,-<-" 6*^€-v'
WELL DATA \ \ r 'Total Well Depth •)- S Well Diameter > - 7Initial Water Level '1 TJ (. 9 V • ^ ^ 'Water Column Height
3 Well Volumes ga
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT)C_ Pumping
s
Air Litt
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal Hl/kkv\ C*(u PI/CV,
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
\\'b\
tf/^S
H'.loiHinIH',17
H',)\H;^MM<)7
fy'lfi
f^
Well Vc(x) (height) x=.163 gal/tt @ 2", x=.653 gal/tt @ 4"lume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well / O, A I gals
Surging Bailing
t )" M. - i
lion ' L/\ {"£, /^D /^vy^iW,
^/?A- f i , /O IU,'
^/^'r !
Other
/' Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes / No J
TEMP("C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
1 ^ /•» ^/
J ^ v \)
l l . f l
I t-HS
't,oV? i ^J 'r*--
/ vV i
Qfrrv/?
100
757iHlOq-
8U
^Mloi
4 v
7 Yl/" O /r) i / h
£,1<;(.^t'iH/- 3 (/
^V7>r- <9 ^
°,^
^05,1ot,«7
t,f^t^. /"y
^ On
l/< 6 ^
Checked By
,)^J ((
'9 l.i?V^c^S^V;^Uo^^7,7
1U0'^s:^1
1^^'^.u1
?5^7'^^7'
7 ^\
!
vl
/ ^
'%^
'V/ lA1 LA/^|L/ .
//>, -0
/v •'^A
Date
Version 6-14-04
1I1
11III1iiiiiiiim
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name Project Numbern^Y7J~£
Page of / .
Well Number
Date\0'0k) "05
Field Investigator(s)"i" Lfr&y
WELL DATA H > /- ' 'Total Well Depth oU- Cnitial Water Lev
Water Column \
3 Well Volumes
/el ^ 5" 7 | J^eiaht
qa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT^ Pumping
s
Air Litt
Well Diameter ^Z^h^ > /•S"(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Weir"^ > q^\\OL.<- aals
Surging Bailing
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal LAyfU^ 6'd /WV </• l/ M;V.»f ^-
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
n'3sp',10
/v.vifV.H ftn\5iIV,£$-I) ', (
/ M , , v ^ion / \<L<ff /i/'Vii*-*.
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (No^y
P.M.fh (Vo™ i-fJ^1 J;/Ai i • i
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
I3T.10
K.J7
)7/^
5«765,010/y'
Checked By
6^9
61 «
6 If
6 1 51 '
6/7£ 277(
7Jo
7 1 ^1 M
7187,/p;
7/7~-70 c //- x-
1 1/ U01
1817?o77H
"7,1^f
^(/^
Jt3>3^X7^ ll^)H,^
K.7I1\J ^- *™^ 1
Q /^~ "S
T?.^^5,70'
^ (1\ t\
Date
l^w
^/^/^IL/^k
IL/;^
U/^
iVersion 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Namekr o )0-f ^,L£<,
Project Number
Page J of / .
Well Number
Datelo -Q <r-0s
:ield Investigator(s)
WELL DATATotal Well DepthInitial Water Lev<Water Column H
3 Well Volumes
1
Jl 'eiaht
qa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTy<C Pumping
s
Air Lift
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal (Mfi1 ' C&. fW PW+
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
\\\\\
'^7/ I \ "\ f\i l 1 " H
Uni1 CF * J S
"1Well Diameter '<
(x) (height) x=.163 gal/n @ 2", x=,653 gal/tt @ 4"Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well qals
Surging Bailing
\01 i
ion fM.(kiU/^M' J)isfi^ 0
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (N<X
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
W.U/L•/n
} I C/^-
7 (4 F^ ff ft
Checked By
4HM(^7. ^->
77/7.177 O•7 5-- ,
)Q to
M
<M3
8'K/ /^c^
3V0'1
^^7.1^'J,^
Date
1I1I1I1111i1
1w
•Version 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Droject Name Project Number
Page of -L
Well Number
.)\w~~}>
Date
Field Investigator(s)7 . 6x i u
WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF
y
(oth <H.evel /n Heiaht
es qa
"WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
s
Air Lin
nWell Diameter '.
(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", x=.653 gal/tt @ 4"Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal /McL'/Lfr-w P(/Y^P
Method of Sample Collec
3hysical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
R'D/ f ;^?Ml(Jl;0Ji|)'.ol
(ion M.(2^A/^ ff\ikp- yt/VT^-P
qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes /N: \
lo^
TEMP(°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/1.H7
fc.lt
MM£<w
47)¥%
^<? ^-^
7O7^7'Ts
'7T- 39 £
Bsr6-I7&,/!,,/l^^ji
dH7, 7Wi8Is-i.t
Checked By Date
IVersion 6-1-)-CM
IBlack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name Project Number/) Y-^ ~7^Q
Page \ of / .
Well Number
Date10 'O^^oS
Field Investigator(s) --. r
Lt C<Xe,/WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial WaterWater Colum
3 Well Volurr
METHOD OF
»pth ~~|_eveln Heiaht
ies qa
: WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
Is
Air Lift
nWell Diameter (-
(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well qals
Surging
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING1 h \
Method of Water Removal fNLff^ Let-fat^ D ijr^P
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
// / CN- <J
|l'.T!>
ft 13511 138
^ / i
lion {Msk'.Lfrl&l. biW^V1 '
Bailing Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes /No/
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
Af.^21*7,10
/5,,)i</^/>
^79ol5ol
/r ^
77Z7,7;7.O
77 r-9 f\ s
^-^
Q ill
0 ? a
8. ISi \ IfC ft ' (A
^Hj^f?J^^"V,/
Checked By Date
Version 6-U-O4
111•
1111111111111111
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
ProjectName ^A6£_ j(Lri/i'tAl
/
Project Number
Page / of / .
Well Number
Date
Field Investigator(s)
WELL DATAotal Well Deoth 1nitial Water L
Water Colum
Well Volum
.eveln Heiaht
es aa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTty~- Pumping
s
Air Lift
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal IM^' Lfr-f-tk. '^
Method of Sample Collec
3hysical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
II : n
//;; ifll'.lr
-)Well Diameter '.
(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well qals
Surging Bailing
^0/
ion v<$,d'6frityk ft/VY\/y
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes /f\lo)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/ 7 3 X
I£<HILU
$//
Yj/y$7
»t_^ yf ' \rT /» 5 y
// n cA-
73{
/^>7<-
8,y(
0,09
8<n-_-7/
toy. If
Wly^"5(V/J~/"^)W\ //^- 9
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-O4
IBlack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name „AU WisiCet*
Project Number0 H 7JLO
Paqe / o f / .
Well Number
HK'lDate
/0-&r-09Field Investigator(s)
7 , L*(e t/WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF
K
/
Pth ^ ..eveln Heiaht
es qa
WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
s
Air Lift
nWell Diameter ',
(x) (height) x=.163 gal/tt @ 2", x=.653 gal/tt @ 4"Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well qals
Surging Bailing
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal //£/{/& K/l fi^P
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
/^>Tm\\0\V\/o*<t7
fotfJL
(ion /W/^fe// ^lAr^pU ^ 1 1
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Y e s / N o j
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping /%<Jf ./~)t
fi.u/4.11f- f .71
(1 1>0 fofa
wf17W
• ^
7. ^1411.687f- T/ ^
^3^?,?/
^,^7iW'/m
2#.¥^2736/7
Checked By Date
Version 6-
ii
iiIiiiiiiiiiiiii
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name ~ Project Number
Page / of ( .
Well Number
^ ~ I) T ~~fl C"Field Investigator(s) / / r~- / /
"2 • 6» <T€ v/ ' 6 . >nK. vvrWELL DATA
otal Well Denitial Water I
Water Colum
Well Volum
METHOD OF
X
oth "[.eveln Heiaht
es qa
WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
s
Air Lift
Well Diameter ',(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well qals
4Surging Bailing
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
/ /, / n /-,Method of Water Removal /A. f> /fi< -<* +<-f{ IL//Y\fJ
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
\0( 1 $~
to [^o10 Wlo\u~]to Hi L
ion ff^C ml C l A 1^(^/3
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes /No/
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/$"'&/ 5. nIS-lOi-tJ
V?5t05"^98
^iY\ flk1
7517^073^
, ^77 <r-7£
§•670-70V i Qfj
0
/?7 ,X207sa/?,r
lo(<p>
Checked By Date
Version 6-1 4-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project NameAw, Wt"'^
Project Number
0H7JL0
Page J_ of / .Well Number
ftu^VDate 1Ih - O^fiC
Field Investigator(s) ,/, U&V
WELL DATATotal Well DepInitial Water LeWater Column
3 Well Volume
,h TvelHeiaht
s qa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTf)C Pumping
Is
Air Lift
Well Diameter ((x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well qals
Surging Bailing/ ^
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal INtki Lfr-tfA Pjb\$
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
(^')ool Mof),"*?OV.}\Ol'^l
ion /cJ..lCftK/l Pt/)^/)/ i
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes Aio~)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
ft 08HJ7
If. 877^/^,
Checked By
Tft911
5S7>'« ^
7^7,3?7^77?.r--n
&.3^8.T1$6r
fa/leCff,
^1
.1
9«^y•/
Date
Version 6-14-04
I11V -
11iIiiiiiIiiIii
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name ,f\Cf. Se/<^<
Project Number
OWllOField Investigator(s) /•
*-. UK^L/i/VELL DATATotal Well Denitial Water LWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OFV
/
oth -|.eveln Heiaht
es qa
WELL DEVELOPMENTDumping
s
Air Lift/ -•
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal (fa (I ' ifa fa\-
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
iO'.Oo10:0 |
(o;Cft&<*
Page / of 1 .
Well Number
A/-KVDate
10 -05-05
Well Diameter .(x.) (height) x=.163 gal/tt @ 2", x=.653 gaim @ 4"
Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging . Bailing
PuV^ 0
ion Oea/6^f4 fti/faj)1 1
qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ( NoJ
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/Or18.01l$.o?
fot^fi
fi).}Y85tuI? ,)7
7,vr7.H7«'75"-]SiU
7./67,/(^,^5
dUef.^
')!£/
3i j-;•?/>.^/
Checked By
Version 6-1 4-04
Date
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page of
Well Number
Project Nam Project Number Date
Field Investigator(s)£-«
A/ELL DATA'otal Well Depthnitial Water LevelA/ater Column Height,
Well Diametero lt
. 06 '(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
Well Volume (gals) *~ "?.'•!
3 Well Volumes iA 1 qals Amount of Water Removed from Well qals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift Surging Bailing Other
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
/) / &Cn /> /i I'' I '/i (WMethod of Water Removal [As r rv~^ u !' (/>vy' v v^-t> Y >l
Method of Sample Collection rA rt.rO P(yf^i^n
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes
Physical Appearance
Remarks
,lfi J ~ Do '
TIME TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
111.1 /'
) S ' - H 7IZIi 8*7
/
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-04
11i
iiiiiiiiiIiiiii
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
3roject Name . , Project Numbet
Field Investigators) /•7. , 6*1 W
WELL DATATotal Well Denitial Water I
F'age of 1 .
Well Number
Date
lo-oQ-oc
/K-' f "pth I^J . Well Diameter '.evel I I I ' / / '
Water Column Height
3 Well Volumes qa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT/*v Pumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collect
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
i ( h/ ) ' •) ,-i( b . J-l)
H\i\K',9-4R:^7
U.'/U{(l^
S
Air Lift
(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", >Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well I ^
Surging Bailing
OLLECTION/PURGING
1 P(/flvr* (zpt fUirf ^ \sW\tw*
ion » i'O {• (/( yj/^
r.653 gal/ft @ 4"
qals
Other
" Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes Qsloj
TEMP(°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
i -?/' 1 'W
ir,^1 6 , 3 0
/&0D
1^17^/^KVV
—7—r
n#]na/3^
O^?/r' >7
/ ^2/
^r^-^77
^,7Y^7Y
75-^ 7 colkc
4./?
&0, 73
°.(\
<9,r7rti
^hiMhonwit?./
/]J,//•v
Checked By
(0 fa(\\\
I/
Date
' ' \ 6$!^
\
V"T
Version 6- H-O4
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page. of
Well Number
- IT'reject Name
A££ '
Project Number Date
Field Investigator(s)2A/ELL DATA ' ~ ;
otal Well Depth J^f Dnitial Water Level I XP.^-A/ater Column Height Qy
3 Well Volumes
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
Well Volume (gals)
gals Amount of Water Removed from Well .gals
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift Surging Bailing Other
ETHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal lk£/k(,£W^ f Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes /No
Method of Sample Collection
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
3'. 15 Start Pumping
13 ; 3 15.17 7 /kl
0 :
V
Checked By Date
Version 6-14-O4
111•
1111111111111111
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name « Project Number0 Y4 7J-0
Field Investigator(s)
"2.. 4, feyWELL DATA " 1 -\ ~> r- 1
otal Well Deoth (7- ) J
Page
Well
Date
10
-^-of-j^
Number
Y-l£>-ot-or
Well Diameternitial Water Level / 1 *) , <T<9 '
Water Column Height O T - 9 ;
Well Volumes qa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT")s Pumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
M'.OJ
iLf.ftf
wuf « 4 ' ) 7JL|'. jQ
s
Air Lift
OLLECTION/PURG1NG
. ^ vf/L/ j. J-1 77^ ' 1 lrLT //'£,
Well Vo(x) (height) x=.163lume (gals)
gal/ft @ 2'
Amount of Water Removed from Well *~v"' ^
Surging Bailing
ItLtKfk P^P
ion fic.luj?^ futr^p
, x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
-^ qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes l^P
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping fi/ft\/) iA\hJ(<j C?K if L. ^^^/K*
(S-ST/r-^19-M
$&™
Iffi
<ff 3
^/
^ )•/
7,rj#
7,rr7f/
75'7; calif
$•$1
9So£.•}/
^W
W5^if?./X/,3
7iJ,ft'
\
Checked By
Version 6-1 1 -04
^JU^J
^V
7<sy/»I/
j x^
Date
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
3rojeat Name /
/V (L ) C/^tv*
Project Number
rield Investigator(s)7.. r+UM
WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OF
:pth f-D T_evel / f 0 . }-[) '
n Heiaht £ H • £ '
es qals
WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping Air Lift
;
Page
Well
6
i of_L
Number
Date
10 -fi^-or
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft @ 2
Well Volume (gals)', x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
Amount of Water Removed from Well tr~U
Surging Bailing
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal /7<W£>tf<A Pc/T^ P
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
iv^rl$(<0)1 '• 0 5"
\9.011?. ID
/ iion ls-£fl^i CJf^ t^A r 'T^P
Was Well Pumped Dry?
qals
Other
Yes Xlo)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/f-flf
/4-&T;
/ ^ •7 f c7^/h
£436f 4
^1^^ <)
6- n S6 ' 3 3
eay,77f-^ / f^lte
7J£8.100.^
W
~~^ /I/? ^-* L/O'J~
f—t "2s^ Q
~"^ *~J f°l s\C C A/ <_1
iio.y
V
Checked By
^M(
\/
loo *)/>*1
Y
Date
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
ProjectName /'
/V C £- /C/~(^~t~Cf f
Project Number
Oti£f7^oField Investigator(s) /••
~2- < (-^rftyWELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water 1Water Colum
3 Well Volurr
METHOD OF
y
(
jpth ^7^.evel i^.10'n Heiaht *}fl . V
es qa
WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
Is
Air Lift
Page._Aof_^
Well Number
Date
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=.163
Well Volume (gals)gal/ft @ 2",
Amount of Water Removed from Well <r~£
Surging Bailing
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal My- itfrttfr PufaP
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
ILL 1 7 (1
L(-'. L/A
^^LJT I,T$
W'.r^
:ion (fCw /C ^ 4~*w^ f^Ufa L
x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
7 sj/t/ qals
Olhev
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (^o)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/ f , 5^\^<1>~1>1 'iX
4r^Z?/
$&yC70\
5oo«. 3-7
^407<\b
"?,ll
7T-5 1 to
•-n Q i(' \ 0
8,M8,3^//*(.&£
^-7^83$l8
^^
15'
\
' /C?
/
Checked By
' r-^Ai/ •
j
Date
1 /)S){ L/Ls fi/?S>\
/
W
Versicxi6-U-CM
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name /
A#l tCf(/'iLi'~>
Project Number
Field Investigators),*Z- ( L&(,eu
WELL DATA 7 ,Total Well Deoth j~7 SInitial Water LWater Colum
3 Well Volum
.evel /4H , 08 'n Heiaht ""KO. ^X'
es qal
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENT^ Pumping
METHOD OF SAMPLE C
Method of Water Remova
Method of Sample Collect
Dhysical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
/ /**— 1 \i 1/ C., f *«J-
/S ',37
JV,Y7
/S \ I
s Am
Mr Lift
F'aqe ' of
Well Number
i— X ""'Zp- -Date
W-o^-o$
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", x=.653 gal/tt @ 4"
Well Volume (gals)
ount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
OLLECTION/PURGING
1 /A^.fi^C-0-^L /6/Kh /
ion /l^Ai'fjfiwA. j9UY*\f'
^^ 1 rt / X / 1/T~^ ^^-i qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (Np)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
l$,loI^SO
IH.S3-
6^
8JidQK
0J-I
2 }-7
-7 n\
C".75^Stf
^r-& 1 £,//,
8'U3-tff
rl
»?&r303,^
^8
l^of
\ /
Checked By
^^J
IXy
&*/>*,^'
J /
Date
Version 6-14 -04
111•
1111111111111111
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Droject Name /Progc^mbe^
Page
Well
£;
of _LNumber
Date
Field Investigator(s) _~ ,
WELL DATA "} )C>Total Well Depth <f 1 'nitial Water Level <; f , 7/9 '
Water Column Heiaht £ f) • V
3 Well Volumes qa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTX Pumping
s
Air Lift
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal d.w'CsA. fW.
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
/5(lT£
5'^3/S'55"ISiSf t/£ ' / ) / )
Am
Well Diameter(x)
Well Volum
ount of Water Re
Surging
PUY^ f>
lion ^&/ft^rtA P t/*^f
(height) x=. 163 gal/ft @ 2'e (gals)
, x
s^}r>Amoved from Well ^-^
Bailing
Was Well Pumped Dry?
= fi53 gal/tt @ 4"
tjtttf. qals
Other
Yes (£ oj)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
^.6?ft.fllW/?
W^
^4*fl)ScXo
!e y
£<%
/T^^^- /8
7~?C — [*3 ^
9.Ha/fgj$
///fV
3 l
33g,g3fif.7
Checked By
K170'
/
~^OM(i
\ /
&&*I/H
\
I
\K
Date
Version 6-1 4 -04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONI7ORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name ..
Page -L«-L
Well Number
Project NumberTo-df-o?
Field Investigators)"Z_ . ^tC^-y
WELL DATA 'Total Well Depth nl 0 b Well DiameterInitial Water Level / 5 0. ^Q>Water Column Heiaht // f- 7 '
3 Well Volumes qa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTV Pumping
S
Air Lift
Well Vc(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft @ 2"
)lume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well &£,
Surging Bailing
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal /Y fr ' ' (skMtk Pi/Y*^ [
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
\ti.U
\[\}*\
It'/U/ £ ' / £\(\\(
tion ff^d^CO^^A f<sr*\/
x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
7 qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes /NcN
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
Start Pumping .»
l^-Tl)S4?Mo^^/
•$&
5/X5 / I
J A V.
If5 f/- /
6.ff9,^q^;D7C-^3 </ f^l
8*6 1C/<-6cA-
f?,Vf^w
1<&0
V?^
38^.7
/^jo1
> S
FLOWRATE
^Mtol
\ /
7^^'
\f
Checked By Date
Version 6-14 -O4
111•I
111111111111111
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
3roject Name x-/\C6, j&vlCf{
:ield lnve_stigator(s)
WELL DATAotal Well Denitial Water I
Water Colum
Well Volum
METHOD OFiL
pth.eveln Heigh
es
Project Number
e</ /&.F,/K»fi
\ 5~^. ID 't ISA1
qa
WELL DEVELOPMENTDumping
s
Air Lift
Page_/_of / •
Well Number
Date
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2
Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well
Surging Bailing
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal //fy/A ^^dA \U\\V
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
ic.?rI / - . S 6[ 1 9 7ll\00
Ull
ion Mttifoek rUr\01 i
/ (S/l\ /' ' U T '<^1/l//vi v**\y»'vt. eJv O-s\
Was Well Pumped Dry?
W^ ^<r-OK L/k/ ' tfn*L, U^V ij'
^r^ o
', x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
qals
Other
Yes Q3?
n
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
/5.3)
H.K\&.
Checked By
f37
f HW </,r|
6Ul8J7j\t j77C-
3.^7 .c.r/77
- 400, ?-^7.^/ fr/T'/w /-
1W./D1
I. vl
N
Vf
1 1 s~^(
VI
s
/
^r^A
/\b
Date
Version 5- 14-Ot
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Page. of
Well Number
II
roject Narne Project Number Date
Field Investigator(s)"
NELL DATAbtal Well Depthnitial Water LevelA/ater Column Height_
5 Well Volumes
i -, V<*- ' - Well Diameter
.001(x) (height) x=.163 gal/ft @ 2", x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
Well Volume (gals)
gals Amount of Water Removed from Well .gals
vIETHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTY^ Pumping Air Lift Surging Bailing Other
ETHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
ethod of Water Removal /LfjLi> LA* ™~ Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes ^Ng)
Method of Sample Collection
hysical Appearance
Remarks
TIME TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
(',36 Start Pumping
(PI
\7
Checked By Date
Version 6- 14 -04
111•
1111111111111111
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project Name Prgiect Number
Dage jLo'_LWell Number
Date
:ield Irivestigator(s)
WELL DATA , 'otat Well Deoth IIS
nitial Water IWater Colum
Well Volum
.evel /Sy$J 'n Heiaht 'd- 1 , I 5 '
es qa
METHOD OF WELL DEVELOPMENTX Pumping
s
Air Lift
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=. 163 gal/ft @ 2"
Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well '^ ^
Surging Bailing
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal /A (A ' fa ttfi fi(Jf^ fl
Method of Sample Collect
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
)7'-W— ' 9 1 ii 1
/7! /0T I 1 ff*~ U
17'.
ion (A.t&! LttJ&Oi, /x/irv/1
x=.653 gal/ft @ 4"
0 ft<&( qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes (^Nof
TEMP(°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYpH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
Start Pumping
{ KloIf, 75'^7)/frifr^pk
fio?Qoo71$
\ J->7
£>.&(>£.{<!
(>,(5
r-#£ £0Hfl
#Jf
9.818<?i
r,+zJi \.
MIS3/^.t
330.^
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
!&&'
v /
Checked By
FLOWRATE
'"-kw
\
1 .J/
Date
/•^/^\
<^/
Version 6-14-04
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
ProjecLName -At£ W l/i6?f
Project Number
Field Investigator(s)*Z - U(^
WELL DATATotal Well DeInitial Water IWater Colum
3 Well Volum
METHOD OFK
fpth 3~~1 & '.evel JS6.10'n Heiaht X - 1 0y
es qa
WELL DEVELOPMENTDumping
s
Air Lift
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal fAc/A / /Vv^A
Method of Sample Collec
^hysical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
17-3717:47/7'.f#p:<;017 '.a
Page
Well
f,Date
/
_Lofj_Number
/
Well Diameter(x) (height) x=.163 gal/tt @ 2'
Well Volume (gals)
Amount of Water Removed from Well '"""""'
Surging Bailing
,ion /Atpl C&fak fli/VKfl
, x=.653 gal/n @ 4"
ff~0z»^( qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes /w>)
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
f£T£
/snii,%
<«m/^(
^ 'S6 /5 ^ £5V
f X7
7-377.181.07
7 !>-g7 Collet
%S(
^78^i
«J
.7^i9i .r
/9£.!0'
I
_\, /
Checked By
~lo^\
1I/
/ry*/
^Date
111•
1111111111111111
lack & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
MONITORING WELLDEVELOPMENT/PURGING DATA
Project NamevAr€ ^>>&HrV^3
Project Number
:ield Investigator(s) 1 \ — ,Z-—Cr\}tl} / (j r \^€ |ci/s-v-
WELL DATAotal Well Denitial Water I
Water Colum
Well Volum
METHOD OF
xT
f t ^
pth P 2-^-1.evel \~^-~l'ti-T'n Heiqht 1 1 7,5V '
es qa
WELL DEVELOPMENTPumping
s
Air Lift
Page _o.J_
Well Number
i ^/-^"~ /Q
Date10 - ^-cp~~
Well Diameter <(x) (height) x=.163
Well Volume (gals)gal/ft @ 2", x=
Amount of Water Removed from Well £.<- -K
Surging Bailing
METHOD OF SAMPLE COLLECTION/PURGING
Method of Water Removal JU^ v' <>*i?4 tfu fi)
Method of Sample Collec
Physical Appearance
Remarks
TIME
\L^n\m, iTj/
10 '- fi}m /q
Ions
ion £\?*-L{ £**(-&{ Y(^^-~O
.653 gal/ft @ 4"
^^ qals
Other
Was Well Pumped Dry? Yes( NoJ
TEMP (°C)SPECIFICCONDUC-
TIVITYPH TURBIDITY DO ORP
WATERLEVEL
TOTALWATER
REMOVED
FLOWRATE
Start Pumping
JS.^IS o^
I }-Oo
^•Oifos:
7c%l
68(tin^ ^ /
73Yl.ol(.U
ry?k ~~3
1
^^-^
T7r-7\
I'd f
7^9
w6^
I
^U
^Y^357^
^73-J
IZ7.fr
III'
.^ r- J
Iv/Checked By
Version 6-14-CM
Date
ter^{
\ /V
IIIIIIM Appendix C
Field Sheets
IOctober 2005
"S
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIii
rfl.Sample Collection Field Sheet
US EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 1 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-1- _
Project ID: RS07GEProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
State: Kansas
Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
Expected Cone:
Latitude:
Longitude:
External Sample Number: W~ MW~t
(or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date
Sample Collection: Start:
End:
Time(24 hr)
oa:<a&
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TEMPSC
DOORP
" 6.4
= 4?0.
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 2 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-2-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
State: Kansas
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
1 oration Desc: MVv~£,~ D
Expected Cone: (or
Latitude:
Longitude:
Laboratory Analyses:
External Sample Number: M/-AfiA/-£~7> 70040 )
Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Sample Collection: Start: JQjQ&Q5 1L.3S
End: / / :
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP =SCPH •
DOORP =
Sample Collected By: GF
43? /LAS/cm6.36
?.G4mq/L463.3 mv
1 of 1
1
1
I•
1
•"
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I•
11•
1
1•
1
1
1111111
1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
% ft>ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: ,3 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
ID: 2775-^-_
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
1 oration Desc: [*1W'~ fZ~ LJ
External Sample Number: l/V"* r*/KV ~/S.
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: JQjQ&QQ
Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TGMP s /G.(5/8°CCV* — 4.QC2 cyAy
pH * 6.36
T" VS — *3 f* A //LAJ i.U>T*rnQ/L(^\Bp a 4LQO r\U/%r TOj.iSmv
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
-D-/OO4n?m mm mm 1 k^V^
Time(24 hr)
f_L'-j3G.
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 4 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-4-
Project ID: RS07GEProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
State: Kansas
Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
Expected Cone:
Latitude:
Longitude:
External Sample Number: W~ MW~ 13~ D"
(or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date
Sample Collection: Start: JQjQ&/C&
End: / /
*Time(24 hr) •
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMPSCFH
DOORP
- £63uShm
m /L
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
• Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
IASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 5 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-5-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart• Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
•
Location Desc: A/yV"
External Sample Number:
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 7Q/Q£Q5
• Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:
I Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
| (N/A)
I TfiMP =
• 6C 3 4?<3uS/cm• — / / 2 A-» f^f^'- 3.7?
DO a 8.I ORP s 604.6 r&
I
I
IM Sample Collected By: GF
Il of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 6 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-6- •
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples •
City: Colby State: Kansas |Program: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 •
Location Desc:
External Sample Number: W~MW~ IS ** T~
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: IQjQ&QB H1&
Longitude: End: / / :
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
= 1S.83°C
PH =
Z33 - 8.£9m/LQRP • 44.9.
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
• Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
I
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 7 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-7- _•
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
I Project Desc: Ace Sen/ice Inc. - LIRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: MW~1&~S _
I External Sample Number: W'MW" lfi~S~
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 7Q/Q&.Q5ILongitude: End:
Laboratory Analyses:
•
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitalner HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
» IS.89°C3 681 uS/cmpH - 6.86
DO = a3/mq/LI ORP = 49fi./crlv
I
I
I_ Sample Collected By: GF
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field Sheet •US EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS I
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 8 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-8-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples •
City: Colby State: Kansas |Program: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: M\A/-1&~D _
External Sample Number: W~ MW~ \fi~D~ 1OC&O& •
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr) •
I
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: /QjOS'OS Q9.:fiD
Longitude: End: / / : •
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments: ~~~
(N/A) I
I
TenpWW i^j r >JVwr/vjii<
/
DO = ?.6Qmq/L •OKP = (34&<5mv |
I
I
ISample Collected By: GF •
1 of 1
I
I• Sample Collection Field Sheet
US EPA Region 7• Kansas City, KS
I ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 9 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-9-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
I
_ Location Desc: r/l/V" J4> " JL
• External Sample Number: W~MW~ f^I* IQO&Ctf
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: /OyQ5.Q5 Q2..59
n Longitude: End: / / :
Laboratory Analyses:
•
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubltainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
| (N/A)
" TEMP =
• SC * 6?<9 uS/cm1 -- = ?.aarI
JJU = uGG IDQ/JL/I ORP = 352.0
I
1
Ig Sample Collected By: GF
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 10 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-10- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: MW"1?"T
External Sample Number: W" MW~ /7~ T"
Expected Cone; (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: /Qj DS
Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP =
DO -- <9.44m/LORP -
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
I• Sample Collection Field Sheet
US EPA Region 7• Kansas City, KS
IASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 11 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-11- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
I Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
_ Location Desc: MI/V~ 1?"3
• External Sample Number: M/"* M(A/~ 1?~\S~
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 1QjQ5<35
•
Longitude: End: / /= =
Laboratory Analyses:
•
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
I (N/A)
I• TEMP =A3.00°C
= 896 uS/c~ C? no-/
I DOORP ;
I
I_ Sample Collected By: GF
I
I1 of 1
ISample Collection Field Sheet
US EPA Region 7 _Kansas City, KS •
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 12 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-12- I
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples •
City: Colby State: Kansas •Program: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 I
• nation DeSC: MIA/-17-D
External Sample Number:
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start
Longitude: End
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
•W-MW- rr-n-imm^
Date Time(24 hr) I
: 1GL&5QQ li:5&
: _J_I : I
•
11 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP •
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TZMP * 7v5.S6°C6C * 46 / uS/cm_» / / •• ^2 £* f *'DO = 8.34-mq/LORP " (389. £rw
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
1B
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I• Sample Collection Field Sheet
US EPA Region 7• Kansas City, KS
• ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 13 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-13-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
I Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
_ Location Desc: MIA/" /fi~O
• External Sample Number: M/~MW~ /fi~S~
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
I
ISample Comments:
| (N/A)
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End: /
• Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals In Water by ICP
SC = 890uS/cmI pH » G.5?
• DO a d.OSmq/L| OKP = 465.<S
I
I
I_ Sample Collected By: GF
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field Sheet •US EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS •
IASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 14 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-14-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples •
City: Colby State: Kansas IProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: MlAf~lfi~D -
1
1
External Sample Number: \AJ~ MIA/" /<9-D" /QQ5Qff
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr) •
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 1CL/CQQ& :
Longitude: End: / / : •
ILaboratory Analyses:
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A) I
TEHP = 16.SA-°C 'GC ~ 4?8jjS/cm •pH = ?.47^ |
TV*\ = O OD ^^>/lUU o.rvjiornQ/AjORP = 434.8 mv I
I
I
ISample Collected By: -SP **Jd M
I1 of 1
1™ Sample Collection Field Sheet
US EPA Region 7I Kansas City, KS
8 ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 15 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-15- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
IProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
•
-•
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
External Sample Number: W~ MW~ 1fi"I"
Longitude: End:
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 1QjQ&QS
ILaboratory Analyses:
I Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals In Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
I
t TEMP -1&11°C1 SC = 62Ou£/cm
I 1X3 = 8.4O mq/LORP =^3S./m^
I
I• Sample Collected By: -6P
1
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 16 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-16- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: Afyv~yC"O
X External Sample Number: W~ MW~ /5 ~ S~
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End:
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMPSCpH = 6,33
DOORP * 353.6 nfv
Sample Collected By: -Sf1
\j1 of 1
™ Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
B ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 17 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-17-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
I Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfundft Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
_ Location Desc: MW~3~D
I ^ External Sample Number: tV~/W~<9 ~ D~ 10O&05
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: IQjQ&OS1• Longitude: End: /
Laboratory Analyses:
IContainer Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals In Water by ICP
I
Sample Comments:
(N/A)I
TEMPI 6C
. DO1 QRP =(35?.6m^iii
Sample Collected By: -6f
\j1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 18 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-18-
Project ID: RS07GEProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
State: Kansas
III
Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 IExternal Sample Number: W- MW~ fG " J" 1CC&C& 9
Location Desc:
Expected Cone:
Latitude:
~ /(o~*Z
(or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Sample Collection: Start: 1QjC5tfQ5 /i.:!
Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TZMP = 11.81 °Cc*/~f *• s\ /* /••* f* toC - "rGo u6/crr)
'DO = 8.09 ma/LC\PP a Od.C^ D J^-»v Or* i . jo m v
Sample Collected By: €f- r^p
<\j
1 of 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I•
1I ASR Number: 2775 Sample
Project ID: RS07GE
1 Project Desc: Ace Service Inc.City: Colby
Program: Superfund
I Site Name: ACE SERVICES -
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
Number: 19 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-19-_
Project Manager: Robert Stewart- LTRA GW samples
State: Kansas
- GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
M ^ **/' A-xf 1 A / f ^ f_*
•
Location Desc: r]Yv~ /lO~O
A External Sample Number: l/V~MW~ 1(L~S~ /ODGf
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude:
•
Longitude:
Laboratory Analyses:
Sample Collection: Start: /QjQS'QS J&L.1&
End: / /__ _:
•
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify
Sample Comments:
1 (N/A)
1
• TEMP1 SCI nUpH
1 DO. ORP1
1
i•
Sample Collected By: €f^<*r(/
%
1
, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
= JQ S9°C= ??8 uS/cm~ "? Q /
= ?.99mq/L= GSS.&rii
•%j
. ;s^1 Of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 20 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-20- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: MW-1G>~D
^s External Sample Number: W~MlA/~ 1G~D~
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End:
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMPSC
DO =<S./4mq/LORP s <3£3,2 r*v
Sample Collected By:
1 of 1
IIIIiiiiii
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 21 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-21 -_£D
Project ID: RS07GEProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
State: Kansas
Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: Ml/V~ 1G"D
Expected Cone:
Latitude:
Longitude:
External Sample Number: l/V"M\N~ 1G>".
(or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date
Sample Collection: Start: /Q/0&Q5
Time(24 hr)
End:
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
ITCMPSC
I
iii
DOORP
= 8.74 mq/L
Sample Collected By:
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 22 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-22-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: M M/" ?~ D
External Sample Number: W~ MW~ T3- D"
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End: /_
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
- 15. 1G°C
DO a ?.80ma/LORP =
Sample Collected By:
\j1 of 1
I Sample Collection Field Sheet_ US EPA Region 7• Kansas City, KS
|
«>jj PV-V?ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 27* QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-^f-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
•Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
I Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: nn-a-nExternal Sample Number: lA/~ OS "/T, "LJ~
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: ]QjC[8Q£) Q3.:QQ
• Longitude: End: / / :
Laboratory Analyses:• Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)I
i
n SCI pH
I DO /O.Q9mq/L• ORP ~ 3'W.Gmv
I
II Sample Collected By:
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field Sheet ™US EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS I
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 24 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-24-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples •
City: Colby State: Kansas •Program: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 •
Location Desc: A/i/V"* r "- I M
^ External Sample Number: W~ MW~ ?" I" ?QQfing '
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr) •
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: lQjC&Q5 1&L:4G>
Longitude: End: / / : •
ILaboratory Analyses:
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A) I
•TEMP = H.4&CSC = GGxSuS/cm Ir-jll - P OQ 'l^ti » • *-J m
DO ~ ?.S1 rm/L |C\DD - Q^v4 O d. "w/>/ VJA^TT*. (\j triV
I
I
It is*Sample Collected By: f^T^ -m
I1 of 1
I•
1I ASR Number: 2775 Sample
Project ID: RS07GE
•
Project Desc: Ace Service IncCity: Colby
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES
1Location Desc: MW~ ?~\
^
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS(
Number: 25 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-25-
Project Manager: Robert Stewart. - LIRA GW samples
State: Kansas
- GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
External Sample Number: l/V~M(A/~ P- S~ 700(50^
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude:
•Longitude:
Laboratory Analyses:
Sample Collection: Start: 1Q&ffQ5 /fi.:Q9End: / / :
•
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
| (N/A)
1_ TEMP1 SC
• DO1 ORP1
1
1m Sample Collected By: Gt-^f
1 3
1
= i A 1 O 0/^V/ T*. /O L/
: ^3^5/cm
= ?"9/rm/L
•%njo
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 26 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-26- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: "^^ " .L
External Sample Number: tV~UQ"/8"" T~
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 10/Oft05
Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP a /4..6S°CSC =
DO = ?.89mq/L
ORP
Sample Collected By: -6F- 7\0
1 of 1
1m Sample Collection Field Sheet
1• ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number
Project ID: RS07GE
US EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
: 27 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-27-
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
1 Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesCity: Colby
Program: SuperfundState: Kansas
• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
/o£3« i _ r")
II nratinn Desc: \ /// / /./
1 Expected Cone: (or Circle One
Latitude:
•Longitude:
Laboratory Analyses:
1 Container Preservative
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C
Sample Comments:
| (N/A)
TBMP = i1 SG
C7/J - /
IPrl (
, DO =11 ORP =61
1
1
•
Sample Collected By: -Sf- SK0_j
1
External Samole Number: W~QB~ /" D~ 1QO 'cOfa
: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Sample Collection: Start: A3_/Q2?Q5 /7 : 7iJ
End: / / :
Holding Time Analysis
180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
1 Cf Q^P^C*
4-1?u6/Cm9 C?Q • **J\J
"3 *^r\ //< co rnq/L66.c3 my
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 28 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-28- •
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples •
City: Colby State: Kansas |Program: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 •
Location Desc: LJIJ" I "" -I _
External Sample Number: W~ OB' 1" J" ICCffCfi •
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr) •
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: JO/CMOS
Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP - 16.33°CSC 3
DO =
OFF " 4£0.<3 mv
Sample Collected By: -GF-
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field Sheet
1
I ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number— _ —
Project ID: RS07GE
US EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
: 29 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-29-
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
1 Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samplesCity: Colby
Program: SuperfundState: Kansas
I Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
M\Al- 1 ~ TLocation Desc: / //v / J,
•
Expected Cone: (or Circle One
Latitude:
1Longitude:
Laboratory Analyses:^ Container Preservative• 1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C
Sample Comments:
I (N/A)
1
• TEMP1 SC| pH -
TURBIDITY =1 DO. ORP1
1
1Sample Collected By: -SP-^/Lj
• XJ
1
External Samole Number: IA/~ MIA/- T- I" lOICCft
' Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Sample Collection: Start: /£L(1Q/Q5 /4- ;i8ff
End: _J_J :
Holding Time Analysis180 Days ' 1 Metals in Water by ICP
/.i3Q9mS7cm6.6 /- /.<5 A/71/0. 1£ ma/LiCXJ.Cp rnv
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 30 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-30- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: /^/I/V" / ~ D
External Sample Number: W~ MlA/~ 1"D"
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: /Qy/QQ5 A5.:Q5
Longitude: End: / / :
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days " 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP = 15.88°CSC =
TURBIDITY = -8,9 NTUDO = ?.<8cSm/LOFF =
Sample Collected By:
\J1 of 1
1•
1Sample Collection Field Sheet
US EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
1 ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 31 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag
Project ID: RS07GE
•
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. •City: Colby
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES -
_ Location Desc: MIA/" 1 ~ S
1
Project Manager: Robert Stewart- LTRA GW samples
State: Kansas
GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE
ID: 2775-31-_
Site OU: 02
External Sample Number: W" MM/" 1~&~ 1Q1CC&
1 Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date
Latitude:
1 Longitude:
Laboratory Analyses:
1Container Preservative
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify,
Sample Comments:
| (N/A)
1TfzMP ~
1 sc• PH• TURBIDITY =• DO1 ORP1
1
1_ Sample Collected By: -6f=- WfT
1 \
1
Sample Collection: Start: fQj1Q/QQ
End: / /
Holding Time Analysis
4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
f A-* x- >f cy-*7o. 64 C1.306 mS/cmG.GS
-£.4 Am/0.38 mq/L,754.6 mv
./1 of 1
Time(24 hr)
/jG.:<3Sm
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 32 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-32-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: MW"3"I
External Sample Number : IN"
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start: /Q/H/05Longitude: ___ End: _ / _ / _
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP = 7*.8/°C- <599mS/cm
TuPBtDITY * -}.? NTU
DO =ORP =
Sample Collected By:
1 of 1
1• •
11•
1
1•
1w
11111•
111
1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 33 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE
Location Desc: f*fW~&~ D
External Sample Number: /V"~/v/l/Y~vT
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 70 l11lQF)
Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP - 1<5.1G°CSC s 313mS/cm
TURBIDITY * -/.8 NTUTY^S •«- ^ /* O //JJJ - c.(s& ma/L
S^CJD ~ 7QQ O v(Jf\r /C5O .O HIV
Sample Collected By: -Of- U/"
\ lof l
ID: 2775-33-_
Site OU: 02
-D-1Q11C&Time(24 hr)
7Q.£?
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 34 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-34-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
_ i q _CVLocation Desc:
External Sample Number:
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Dftf Time(24 hr)•
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start: JQjJ&QS
Longitude: ___ End:
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP - £1. 13°CSC - aOSmS/cm
TURBIDITY = 100.6 NTUCO = ?.7Smq/LORP =
Sample Collected By:-Gf-
1 of 1
• Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
IASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 35 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-35- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
•
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:_ _
• External Sample Number: W~ NM/- v5 ~ I~ /O7/Q?
•
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start: JQjLL/05
II
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: ___ End:
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP = A3.68°CI SC =. PH = 7.36• TURBIDITY = 0.8 NTUm DO = ?.30mq/L1 ORPI
I
Ig Sample Collected By: -Gf-
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 36 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-36- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
: MIA/" C) " LJLocation Desc
External Sample Number:
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr) •
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: fQjtt/QS ** ***
Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP
PH = ?.55TURBIDITY = -
6.36 mq/Ln?v
Sample Collected By:
°\^ l o f l
• Sample Collection Field Sheet
1US EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
I ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 37 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-37-— — — —
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
1 Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesCity: Colby
Program: Superfund
State
• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER
_ Location Desc: MW~£"~S
1 External Sample Number:
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High)
Latitude:
1 Longitude:
Laboratory Analyses:
1Container Preservative
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg
Sample Comments:
| (N/A)
|TEMP
1 SCPH
I TURBIDITY*. DO1 CKP1
1
1Sample Collected By: •&£- (J/*
I ^\. }
1
Sample Collection: Start:
End:
Holding Time Analysis
: Kansas
Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
W-MW-fi-f>-1011CfiDate Time(24 hr)
iQ/njos a-.Q3' * • * -^~-^^ § *~ ^^f^^
C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
/w. / r* 0
/. 1S8 mS/cmj ^\ * *
131. 1 NTU?.45 mq/L
19?.8 nil
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 38 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-38- _
Project ID: RS07GEProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
State: Kansas
Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: M]N~4-~I
Expected Cone:
Latitude:
Longitude:
External Sample Number: W"MW" 4
(or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Sample Collection: Start: IQjUjQS
End: _ / _ / _
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 DaysAnalysis
1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP -SC =pH »TURBIDITY*DO =CRP =
?83 mS/cm?. 74
-0.4- NTUG.?3m/L
Sample Collected By: -6F^ I of 1
11I A.SR Number: 2775 Sample
_Project ID: RS07GE
•
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc.City: Colby
Program: Superfund
I Site Name: ACE SERVICES •
Location Desc: /*/( ( /V "~ nr
1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
Number: 39 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-39-
Project Manager: Robert Stewart- LIRA GW samples
State: Kansas
• GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE
nExternal Sample Number: W~ MW~ A- ~
M Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date
• Latitude:
1Longitude:
Laboratory Analyses:
Sample Collection: Start: JQ/U/Q5
End: _/_/
Site OU: 02
D-iaiicfiTime(24 hr)
1Q_.SS.
_ Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
I 1-1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify
Sample Comments:
• (N/A)
1 TEMP• SC
pH1 TuPBIDITf *
DO1 OPP
1
1
1Sample Collected By: €4^ Uf'
1 3
1
, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
7.5.33 °C434-mS/cm?.S7-0.5 NTU?. 7i3 mg/L/G3. ?mv
•»>
L >
1 Of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 40 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-40- _
Project ID: RS07GEProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
State: Kansas
Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
Expected Cone:
Latitude:
Longitude:
External Sample Number: 1/V" MW~
(or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date
Sample Collection: Start: JQjI&Q*}
End: __/ /
Time(24 hr)
09.-.S5
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days
Analysis
1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP
pHTURBIDITYDOORP
?.0£-0.3 NTU6.33 rna/L
Sample Collected By: -6f-
\J1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
I ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 41 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-41-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
•Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
I Location Desc: MW~CQ-P
External Sample Number: W~MW-CtrD- /Q/PA
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 1Qjf£jC& 11 : A3
• Longitude: End: / / :
Laboratory Analyses:
•
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
_ Sample Comments:
| (N/A)
I T&IP = A5.S3°CSC = .4-ttmS/cmPH " ?.58
. TURBIDITY • 33.3 NTH1 DO = 6.3 / md/L
ORP = /GG.9mv
I
I
I
I
Sample Collected By:-Gf-
<f .1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 42 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-42- _ •
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart 'Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: Kansas IProgram: Superfund ™
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: RfMSATE &LE _ ___
External Sample Number: W~ RfM ~ 1O l&Ofi ~ R |
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start: IQjl&QS 1&: J(p
Longitude: ___ End: _ / _ / _ _ : _
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
(BLANK)
Sample Collected By:
1 of 1
• Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
• ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 43 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-43-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
•
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
— Location Desc: M\N~G*~L ;
• External Sample Number: W"MW"C^"T." /O/P/15
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: JQjl£/C&
I
I
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End: /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
| TEMPSC = -64-7 mS/cm
I pH a ?.1?m TURBIDITY = ~1-3 NTU• DO Ci.31 mq/L• OKP
I
I
I• Sample Collected By:
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field Sheet •US EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS •
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 44 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-44- _ •
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples •
City: Colby State: Kansas |Program: Super-fund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 •
Location Desc: A/K/-fp-£ _ .
External Sample Number: W~ MW~ ffl " £r /O 7/PA5 *
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr) •
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start: 1Q/1&/Q5 /<2.:/35
Longitude: ___ End: — / — / _ _ : _ •
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis •
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP |
Sample Comments:
(N/A) I
TEMP B
.pH - f.39 •TURBIDITY - o.<3 NTU •no = ?.56mq/L *ORP =
Sample Collected B
<\J
1 of 1
III•I
—
I
1 Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
I ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 45 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-45-
Project ID: RS07GE
1Project Desc: Ace Service Inc.
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
ISite Name: ACE SERVICES -
Location Desc: M\A/" 1 1" .
1
Project Manager: Robert Stewart- LIRA GW samples
State: Kansas
GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
rExternal Samole Number: ]A/"MIA/"11" I" 7O/PO
1 Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude:
1 Longitude:
Laboratory Analyses:
Sample Collection: Start: /Q/£2OJ3 /T»: Tc?
End: f_J :
_ Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
• 1-1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify,
Sample Comments:
I (N/A)
1 TEMPSC
1 pHm TURBIDITY s
• DO| ORP
1
1
1_ Sample Collected By: -6pW(2
4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
JG.CO°CGOS m£i/Cmr!$3-1.8 NTU6.?<9rrg/L181.0 mv
»»
1 \,
11 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 46 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-46-_
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: MW-11~D
External Sample Number: \N~MW~ 1 /" D"
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 1Qj1£/Q5Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
= 1G.OO°CSC *"* T- fki nPH - ?.dOTURBIDITY = -1.9 NTUDO = ?.39mq/LOFF " 169.8ms
Sample Collected By:-OF
1 of 1
• Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 47 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-47-IProject ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
•
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
ksf t A / Y *f C?
•
Location Desc: iiV^J" I I "*O
External Sample Number: W" MW~ 11" S ~
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 1Qjl£/Q&
• Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:
•
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
| (IM/A)
| TEMP = 15M°C• 5C
I PH. TURBIDITY = 139.3 NTU• DO| ORP
I
I
I• Sample Collected By: -6f=-
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 48 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag
Project ID: RS07GEProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. -
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
Project Manager: Robert StewartLTRA GW samples
State: Kansas
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE
Location Desc: MW~8~ I1 A / t^. ji 1 A 0 f^
External Sample Number: /V~ P/ /Y"C!
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date
Latitude:
Longitude:
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMPscpHTURBIDITY *DOOFF
i //•»Sample Collected Byi^F-^-fto
Sample Collection: Start: /Q/ffiyQS)
End: / /
Holding Time Analysis
Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
/C0 .CJrw 0
633 mS/cmP. /SO
£0.3 NTH6.7? mq/L1GQ.9 mv
f
1 of 1
1•
1ID: 2775-48-__ •
Site OU: 02 •1
, ^ ,^,_,,
Time(24 hr) •
7fl:JS
1
1•
•
1
1
1
1
• Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
IASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: >8* QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-&3-FD
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
•
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
_ Location Desc: MiA/~Q~ T
• External Sample Number: W~MW-&~I~
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: _, Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End:
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 1QjJ&Q5
ILaboratory Analyses:
•
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
I (N/A)
TEMP * 1G.02°CI SC " 633mS/cm
pH ~ ?!(90I TURBIDITY• = £0.3 NTU
I
• DO - 6.??mq/L1 OPP = 763.3 mvI
I
ISample Collected By:-6f-
<;1 Of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 49 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-49-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: MW"S"D
External Sample Number: W~M\A/~fi- D" /Q/£Qg|
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr) —
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: jQj!S/QS /_2.:4Q •
Longitude: End: / / : ^
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
" 15.90°CSC = 4?9mS/cmpH -TURBIDITY* -DO = ?.33mq/LORP = /?e./mv
Sample Collected By: GE-^K-
1 of 1
• Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
• ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 55 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-55- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
•
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
_ Location Desc: Oft" I "O _ :
• External Sample Number: \N~ OB " 1~&-
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start: /Q/&3/G6 11 :OS
• Longitude: ___ End: _ / _ / _ _ : _
Laboratory Analyses:
I Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by TCP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
I T&iP "SC =4/1 mSfan
I pH = ?.d?TURBIDITY = 8.8 NTU
I DO = G.?1 mq/LORP =
III_ Sample Collected By:
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 56 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-56-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
External Sample Number: \nJ~~Qo" K~J"O "
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr) I
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: fQjQ/QB 11:4$
Longitude: End: / / : I
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
= £0.3/8SC =pH "TURBIDITY * ~L? NTUEC = ?.31mq/LORP * 1?L?mv
Sample Collected By:
'<?1 of 1
• Sample Collection Field Sheet
1US EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
I ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 57 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag—
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
ID: 2775-57-
1 Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samplesCity: Colby
Program: Super-fundState: Kansas
• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE
_ Location Desc: MW~fi~S
1m Expected Cone: (or Circle
Latitude:
•
Longitude:
~Laboratory Analyses:
•
Container Preservative
Site OU: 02
External Sample Number: W~ MW~fi ~S~ JO /fld?
One: Low Medium High) Date
Sample Collection: Start: IQj&GS
End: _J_J
Holding Time Analysis
Time(24 hr)
/ .'-C^.
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
| (N/A)
I TEMPSC
1 pHm TURB/D/TY *• DO| ORP
1
1
1— Sample Collected By: -6P 7\~
1 *L1
1G.8?°C669rnS/ClnPOO
-/ . / NTU6.36mq/L,309. 9 mv
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 58 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-58- •
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples •
City: Colby State: Kansas |Program: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 fl
Location Desc:
External Sample Number: V\/~MW~/<8~S~
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 1Qj]QC£5
Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP = 75.35 °CSC = 5,08 mSlcm
TURBIDITY* -O.?NTUDO « Z63 mq/L(~\l3p = on^ >t J
Sample Collected By:
^ 1 of 1
• Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
• ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 59 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-59-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
•
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: R/N&ATZ SAMPLE
I External Sample Number: W" R/N" /Q/i9Q5~ R
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End:
Laboratory Analyses:
•
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
| (N/A)
R/NSAT&&LE (BLANK)I
I
I
I
I
I^ Sample Collected By:
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 60 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-60- I
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples I
City: Colby State: Kansas ™Program: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 I
Location Desc: A/iA/" 7/8 "*X •
External Sample Number: W~ MW" 1&~I~ 1O ISCX?
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr) I
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: JQjl3/C£ /(P:G3
Longitude: End: / / : I
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments: " "
(N/A)
TEMPSC = 4 9 9 mS/CmPH = ?.38TURBIDITY - -£.ONTUDOORP
Sample Collected By:
1 of 1
I Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
• ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 61 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-61-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
IProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
. Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: MIA/"/<d"".
I Externa. Sample Number: W~MW~ IJS'D-
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: 1Qjl3/Q5 /? :Q3ILongitude: End:
ILaboratory Analyses:
M Container preservative Holding Time Analysis
I 1-1 Liter Cubitalner HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals In Water by 1CP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
TEMP " 7G.Ofi°C| SC « 39G>mS/cm_ pH = ?.4&I TURBIDITY'' -1.S.NTU. DO = ?.31ma/L1 ORP -I
I
I^ Sample Collected By
I
Sample Collected By:
\ ,1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7 _Kansas City, KS •
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 66 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-66- I
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples •
City: Colby State: Kansas ™Program: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 I
Location Desc:
External Sample Number:
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End: /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
'-\1,\1T-I
D 0, L *9 A) '
Sample Collected By: GF/ "
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
I ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 67 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-67-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
•Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
m Location Desc:
* External Sample Number: l/^/AU'-M ( -
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: /0/<2£/_&T JL'-il
I Longitude: End: / f :
Laboratory Analyses:
•
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
| (N/A)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I• Sample Collected By: GF
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 68 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-68-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
_
Location Desc: _/
External Sample Number: \S~Afl- \s- $ - /p 6 O<T
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End: /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
(,,L L / ^ - 10 top
, f t . , V = (17. f
Sample Collected By: GF/" /
1 of 1
• Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
• ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 69 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-69-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
•
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfundm Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
I
ii
Location Desc:
External Sample Number:
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End:
Laboratory Analyses:
IContainer Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
iiiii
Sample Collected By: GF (^ ^ /
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 70 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-70-_
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: 1External Sample Number:
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End: /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
j > - ~ 7 / 7
. 0' U Iti ~- 1.1®
Sample Collected By: GF/f^U '-' /
1 of 1
• Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
IASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 71 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-71-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
IProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
I External Sample Number:
Longitude: End:
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: \Oj06jOS
ILaboratory Analyses:
•
Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis1-1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
| (N/A)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_ Sample Collected By: GF
11 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 73 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-73-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 _
Location Desc: ]W 5 ~~ u
External Sample Number:
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: iQjQijJg' I0.\l5_
Longitude: End: / / :
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
* I $.00
0. =
otp'--
Sample Collected By: GF}W- '
1 of 1
1111111111111
11111
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
73
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Numben-^r QC Code: JJJ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-Jfp-F/)
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE
Location Desc: r-™-5 " / ^ > ~~ 0
External Sample NumbeK/r k^f ~ 0 ~~ (0
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: /0/0^/or-
Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
/ / /? / ^ *^ — / I * C )O\ L $r\ js Ls ' '
/
f) $ P — ^Lr~7 0 {/^
Sample Collected By: GF '^l.J, J
1 of 1
Site OU: 02
O<fn? £/)
Time(24 hr)
&:/£
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 75 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-75-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: ' / •
-1 y/-X -loo y#r •External Sample Number:
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: {QjQ$JLS~
Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
f
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
I Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
« Kansas City, KS
I
_
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 76 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-76-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
— Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples• City: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund_ Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
I External Sample Number: It/"- ft1/ -<T 'JOQ^ 0 S~
— Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
B Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End:
III
I
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
I 1-1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
I ~.o. ~-
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
I Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
m Kansas City, KS
IIIIIIII
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 77 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-77-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: T S
External Sample Number: \S~ E fr- £ -
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start: tQj_C$_£>S>
Longitude: ___ End: _ / _ / _
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1-1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
9.17
III
I
Sample Collected By: GFt" c
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 78 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-78-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples I
City: Colby State: Kansas BProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 I
Location Desc: E^ A " ±, L,
External Sample Number: w~ jby ~]_T "
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr) I
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: .JQ/_0/_0$" 0_: J>5^
Longitude: End: / / : I
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
H= 7.1 r
Sample Collected By: GF-W L- it
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
•
—
•_
|
m
•_
•
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 79 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-79- _
Project ID: RS07GEProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
State: Kansas
Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: FX~ 1 j)
Expected Cone:
Latitude:
Longitude:
External Sample Number: V/"~ £)(.-]_/) ~
(or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Sample Collection: Start:
End:
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time
1-1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days
Analysis1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
I
I
I
I
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 80 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-80- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: ^ X"V- L ) _ _
External Sample Number: l//
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start: [
Longitude: ___ End: _ /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
/>// '1.11
Sample Collected By: GF
y* r1 of 1
I Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
• ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 81 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-81-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart• Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesI City: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund_ Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
_ Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
g
External Sample Number:
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: ___ End:
1
I
I
I
I
I
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
I 1-1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
• (N/A)
OSample Collected By: GF '
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 82 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-82- _ •
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples •
City: Colby State: Kansas |Program: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 •
Location Desc: £ A ~~£-j
External Sample Number: It/"- £/- ^-S ~
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: [fij'0$'O_T
Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
Sample Collected By: GF^'(s r
1 of 1
IIIIIIIII
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 83 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-83- _
Project ID: RS07GE
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesCity: Colby
Program: SuperfundSite Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
State: Kansas
Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
Expected Cone:
Latitude:
Longitude:
External Sample Number:
(or Circle One: Low Medium High)
Sample Collection: Start:
End:
~ E X " 3 X
Date Time(24 hr)
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time
1-1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days
Analysis1 Metals in Water by 1CP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
I
I
IIIII
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 84 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-84-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples •
City: Colby State: Kansas |Program: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: A
External Sample Number : l/l/" E^"l> D~
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start: [
Longitude: ___ End: _ /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
^i ' LSample Collected By: GF V///7 \
1 of 1
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 85 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-85- _
Project ID: RS07GEProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
State: Kansas
Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
Expected Cone:
Latitude:
Longitude:
~ 7.L
External Sample Number:
(or Circle One: Low Medium High)
~ £X-*fZ~
Date Time(24 hr)
Sample Collection: Start: /0/O# '_&S
End: _ / _ /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days
Analysis
1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
•.. /ji>pn~T.i
OH f.
Sample Collected By: GF ~\/
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 86 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-86-
Project ID: RS07GEProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
State: Kansas
Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
Expected Cone:
Latitude:
Longitude:
J J
External Sample Number:
(or Circle One: Low Medium High)
- jE~TS -
Date Time(24 hr)
Sample Collection: Start: \QJC£kjgS'
End: I I
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days
Analysis
1 Metals in Water by TCP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
I Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
_ Kansas City, KS
m ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 87 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-87-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart_ Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesI City: Colby State: Kansas
Program: SuperfundSite Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
External Sample Number: l -~ <CX~5~.Zr
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
I Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: lOjCtt/AS~
Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1-1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP8
Sample Comments:
|
"
I
I
I
ISample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
I
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 88 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-88-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
External Sample Number: I//- /? U- X " /OO^Q$
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End: /_
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals In Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 89 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-89-_
Project ID: RS07GEProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: ColbyProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Sample Collected By: GF L
| y
I
Project Manager: Robert Stewart
State: Kansas
Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc:
Expected Cone:
Latitude:
Longitude:
External Sample Number
(or Circle One: Low Medium High)
V-Date Time(24 hr)
Sample Collection: Start: lOj^J^S'
End: _J /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days
Analysis
1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
0.6.
1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7 BKansas City, KS •
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 90 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-90- _ I
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples •
City: Colby State: Kansas •Program: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02 I
Location Desc: At-/
External Sample Number;!/'/?. W- ty ~ /O
Sample Collected By: GF/"
1 of 1
•
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr) I
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: /Q / Otf OS I/ :3 ff
Longitude: End: / / : I
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - l Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
,is.n
I Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
• ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 91 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-91- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
B , Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samplesI City: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund_ Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: " [
External Sample Numbers'/I W 6 -
_ Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
•_
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: ___ End:
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
• 1-1 Liter Cubitainer HNO3 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
• (N/A)
r
II1
Sample Collected By: GF "
1 of 1
I
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 92 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-92-
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: ft V- j( *\
External Sample Number: (/
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start:
Longitude: End:
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
f >U- -7 .$ l
0.0.
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
• Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
•
I
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 93 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-93- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart
•
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samplesCity: Colby State: Kansas
Program: Superfund• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
111
0Location Desc: P>
Expected Cone:
Latitude:
Lonqitude:
I/'" p. ft
(or Circle
External Sample Number: \
One: Low Medium High)
Sample Collection: Start:
End:
/- |lw ~yDate
(£L/QS/_0$-
l - / 0 ( ? S T f l q
Time(24 hr)
Laboratory Analyses:
IContainer Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
1 (N/A)
III_ Sample Collected By: GF
I1 of 1
Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7Kansas City, KS
ASR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 94 QC Code: _ Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-94- _
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert StewartProject Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Location Desc: H f A\ W - A S _
^ External Sample Number: \A/- tf /V'1 ' ' 10 °^O £"
Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: ___ Sample Collection: Start: {tijQ&jbS |5_: $
Longitude: ___ End: _ /
Laboratory Analyses:Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
(N/A)
f/l- 6 ,W
f—1
Sample Collected By: GF
1 of 1
• Sample Collection Field SheetUS EPA Region 7
• Kansas City, KS
I SR Number: 2775 Sample Number: 95 QC Code: Matrix: Water Tag ID: 2775-95-_
Project ID: RS07GE Project Manager: Robert Stewart•Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
City: Colby State: KansasProgram: Superfund
• Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
ILocation Desc:: H \fl\S' I ->
External Sample Number: V'Hf^' ]$-/<><?£ 0$
• Expected Cone: (or Circle One: Low Medium High) Date Time(24 hr)
Latitude: Sample Collection: Start: \bjohj£$
• Longitude: End: / /
Laboratory Analyses:« Container Preservative Holding Time Analysis
1 - 1 Liter Cubitainer HN03 acidify, 4 Deg C 180 Days 1 Metals in Water by ICP
Sample Comments:
Bw\o L O ~ Ik// <
. , f1 D. a CM '*-')'&'> 7
I
I
I
I• Sample Collected By: GF
I1 of!
October 2005
IIII1II Appendix D
_ Chain of Custody Records
I
I
iiiIiiIii
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VII
ACTIVITY LEADEfl(Print) NAME OF SURVEY OR ACTIVITY D)
Bo £> ^TB^AKT -A£g ^E HI/ICES LT£A L \TE OF COLLECTION SHEETrt-K io Ittos . ofi •DAY MONTH YEAR | | /
CONTENTS OF SHIPMENT
SAMPLENUMBER
^L77f- 7 8
)- 7 7£ - 790^775-77JL77S-7M377 C- 731773 - 7CD-77C " &0X775 - 1LX775-UV?7S- 8£
X77S- 831-77C- ^70-775- S/^77S- ftH-
177S-B).^771; v- Bf
CUBITAINER BOTTLE BOTTLE BOHLEVGA SET
(2 VIALS EA)
NUMBERS OF CONTAINERS PER SAMPLE NUMBER
1
|
\
\
— f '» i t\
SAMPLED MEDIA
TV
J(
)(
)(
xxjfXJ(XXXXXAXX
§ sedi
men
t
iolhei
RECEIVING LABORATORYREMARKS/OTHER INFORMATION(condition ot simples upon receipt,
other sample numbers, etc.)
DESCRIPTION OF SHIPMENT MODE OF SHIPMENT
1 b piprF(^) r
1 ICE CHEST
ONSISTING 0
.<;)• HTHFR
: ROXIFS) —A-COMME
COIIRIE•'' ••• — • SflMPL
RCIAL CARRIEf
R
ER CONVEYED
,- UP*
PERSONNEL CUSTODY RECORDF1ELINQUISHED BY (SAMPLER) DATE TIME RECEIVED BY
s£] SEALED UNSEALED p "^'SEALED UNSEALED ["RELINQUISHED BY DATE TIME RECEIVED BY
"ISEALED UNSEALED]" HSEALED UNSEALED fRELINQUISHED BY DATE TIME RECEIVED BY
~1 SEALED UNSEALEO| "[SEALED UNSEALEDf"
5.ZoE8L0fLLljtolli7$(SHIPPING DOCUMENT NUMBER)
REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY
•REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY
REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY
7-EPA-9262(Rev.sed 0/85)
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VII
AC IIVITY LEADER(Print) NAME OF SURVEY OR ACTIVITY D
$o& sTEM/?r A-CB $££!/]: CPt LTrtA LATE OF COLLECTION, ShEET 1
2£ ggg. y^^ j oil i •
CONTENTS OF SHIPMENT ~[
SAMPLENUMBER
X77<T~ Ij3L77.r I "*>X77£-£f~^X)-77^'ftmt' \O ')-77C" f \J-77T- /IJ)-711
7f- ]
^77^- <)0J-T^-I**377C- 9 /D77f "ff?^"77C- 5"^7<T- 1 -F/l
1;77S- 9)<?>
CUBITAINER BOHLE BOHLE
NUMBERS OF CONTAINERS
1
IN1
(
BOHLEVOA SET
(2 VIALS EA)
PER SAMPLE NUMBER
DESCRIPTION OF SHIPMENT
J ICE CHEST
ONSISTING 0
SV OTHER
F ROX
SAMPLED MEDIA
£
*
y%XXKXXXKKX)(
XA1
XX
o sedi
men
t
iother
RECEIVING LABORATORY ^REMARKS/OTHER INFORMATION •(condition ol samples upon receipt. •
other sample numoers. etc.) T
j
1j
1]I]41jij•II•
1.
i•
MODE OF SHIPMENT ^
ESI __XCOMMECOURIE
SAMPLI
RCIAL CARRIEF
R
:R CONVEYED
,. M ^<J2.n£8 /tfU/il/Cfc/I(SHIPPING DOCUMENT NUMBER) "*/
PERSONNEL CUSTODY RECORD •F1ELINQUISHED BY (SAMPLER) DATE
53 SEALED UNSEALED (
RELINQUISHED BY DATE
ISEALED UNSEALED(~~RELINQUISHED BY DATE
~I SEALED UNSEALEDf"
TIME RECEIVED BY
^ SEALED UNSEALED ["
TIME RECEIVED BY
~)SEALED UNSEALED \~
TIME RECEIVED BY
"[SEALED UNSEALED)"
REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY J§
Delbtr ^0 Lai |REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY jf.
•REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY •
7-EPA-926?(Revised 5/85)
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VII
ACTIVITY LEADER(Print) NAME OF SURVEY OR ACTIVITY
Afstt F1&56.F: LTRACONTENTS OF SHIPMENT
SAMPLENUMBER
3L77C-7/^7 7^_ 7 0
V77fW<|V77r-6fe^77C~ftr?7 r- /r?3-7 7 C-^V77r-^Cl^r-X/s
fr™* / / ) tk
rf~""^ / / x "" * fl
"X7~?r-|k171*- ISX7iq-lH177^-79-77 9 -^V
TYPE OF
CUBITAINER BOTTLE
CONTAINERS
BOTTLENUMBERS OF CONTAINERS
1
\
1
1
1
ru
BOnLEVOA SET
(2 VIALS EA)
PER SAMPLE NUMBER
i//1>
DESCRIPTION OF SHIPMENT
_LtL_ PIECE(S) C
4^ ICE CHEST
ONSISTINGO
SV CITHER
c R
uATE OF.COLLEC1 ION , SHEET->Y-M< 6»<^M^x io7< i loll ;
DAY MONTH YEAR | | 1 /
SAMPLED MEDIA
£re
*
XKXXXXXAKXXXXyyX
g1
1
other
MODE OF SHIPMENT
OX(ES)
PERSONNEL CUSTODY RECORDRELINQUISHED BY (SAMPLER) DATE
33 SEALED UNSEALED pRELINQUISHED BY DATE
"~]SEALED UNSEALED!"RELINQUISHED BY DATE
~1 SEALED UNSEALED(~~
5-
X COMME
COIIRIE
bAIWU
RCIALCARRIEFR
ER CONVEYED
\
RECEIVING LABORATORYREMARKS/OTHER INFORMATION(condition of samples upon receipt,
other sample numbers, etc.)
UK\~LOL9, JOU^3LX/OOI|J8^(SHIPPING DOCUMENT NUMBER)
TIME RECEIVED BY
og.'/JL ^ U%y\ SEALED UNSEALED
TIME DECEIVED BY
~|SEALED UNSEALED
r
rTIME RECEIVED BY
~]SEALED UNSEALED^
REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY
UCJI^'&'f CD L-^ 0
REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY
REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY
7-EPA-9262(Revised 5/85)
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VII
ACTIVITY LEADER(Print) NAME OF SURVEY OR ACTIVITY
A35 SERVICES LTRA XMiFtiSpyhoBDAY MONTH YEAR
SHEE"!
/0.
CONTENTS OF SHIPMENT
SAMPLENUMBER
23?6- 1?£??&- 19£?'?5~£D-FL£7?5-£4-,S7? -/S5(277i*>-iS3(S7?«*5 "£G
P?7^-/^2W5-29277/5-30Z??fi-31
P.775-A3£77,5-35£775-5(0/^ -
TYPE OF CONTAINERS
CUBITAINER BOTTLE BOTTLE
NUMBERS OF CONTAINERS
I
1
1
/
J
J/////11///
- — - — "
DESCRIPTION OF SHIPMENT
/LQ PIFCF(S) r.
/ ICE CHEST
[INSISTING 0
SV DTHFR
PERSONNEL CUSTODY RECORDRELINQUISHED BY (SAMPLER) ^^^
"ISEALED UNSEALEDf~
RELINQUISHED BY
~1 SEALED UNSEALEDf"
BOHLEVOA SET
(2 VIALS EA)
PER SAMPLE NUMBER
£ND'
RDX
DATE
"*«,DATE
DATE
,- — — —
^-—
SAMPLED MEDIA
C
1
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXx)(•r-»i
O
^K
sedi
men
t
^
1•o
-*-
olher
>
RECEIVING LA60RATORVREMARKS/OTHER INFORMATION(condition ol samples upon receipt,
other sample numbers etc.)
MODE OF SHIPMENT
ES) ^COMMERCIAL CARRIEF\s rnnnipn
<;iWPi ER CONVEYED
V
(SHIPPING DOCUMENT NUMBER)
TIME RECEIVED BY
— ] SEALED UNSEALED f
TIME RECEIVED BY
~]SEALED UNSEALED [~TIME RECEIVED BY
~JSEALED UNSEALED^
REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY
D&JVER To LABREASON FOR CHANGE
REASON FOR CHANGE
OF CUSTODY
OF CUSTODY
7-EPA-9262(Revised 5/85)
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VII
ACTIVITY LEADER(Print)
BOB STEWARDNAME OF SURVEY OR ACTIVITY
ACE SERVICES LTRACONTENTS OF SHIPMENT
SAMPLENUMBER
£775-37
ggg
£775-4-1<277i5-4££775-43£775 -44£775-46£775-46£775 -4-T5
£775-4££2fl5H8-•ffS77S-49£775-340)^
yftJEO: COLLECTION SHEET JP-C CxTf, <T*XX5 o oil •DAY MONTH YEAR K-» 1 1 •
1TYPE OF CONTAINERS
CUBITAINER BOHLE
NUMBERS OF
/
/
^/ii/iii]i}i11
•"- — _
BOTTLE
CONTAINERS
*
BOTTLEVOA SET
(? VIALS EA)
PER SAMPLE NUMBER
avD S -.
DESCRIPTION OF SHIPMENT
/(j PIECE)
/ ICE CH
S ) C
EST
ONSISTING 0
S): OTHER
F Rny ES)
PERSONNEL CUSTODY RECORDRELINQUISHED
(4fJW&~~\ SEALED /
"1 SEALEDRELINQUISHED
"1 SEALED
BY (SAMPLER)
'pmnurrrvJ/flSEALEO p
1* (J
UNSEALED f~BY
UNSEALED)
DATE
DATE
DATE
TIME
TIME
TIME
- —
SAMPLED MEDIA
_
re
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXy
6
sedi
men
t
T3
otherRECEIVING LABORATORY J
REMARKS/OTHER INFORMATION •(condition ol samples upon receipt. •
other simple numbers, etc ) •
J1JI
1•
1.
|
'
1•
•
^COMMEV miiPig
.^flUPL
RCIALCARRIEF
R
ER CONVEYED
5- —
1(SHIPPING DOCUMENT NUMBER)
»RECEIVED BY
~~| SEALED UNSEALED f
RECEIVED BY
^SEALED UNSEALED f
RECEIVED BY
] SEALED UNSEALEDP
REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODN^
DELIVER To LAELREASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTOD1^
•REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTOUM
7-EPA-9262(Revised
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VII
ACTIVITY LEADER(Print) NAME OF SURVEY OR ACTIVITY 0
fiofl STEWART ACE SERVICES LTRACONTENTS OF SHIPMENT
SAMPLE
NUMBER
/£??£- 5(2>£?7£-6?£77*5 --58£7?5-59£775 -GO£7715-67
^ —
ATEOFCpLJCTION SHEET
A\3 O*/ JaJQS o ofl oDAY MONTH YEAR O T 1 05
TYPE OF CONTAINERS
CUBITAINER BOTTLE BOTTLE
NUMBERS OF CONTAINERS
/
/
/
/
7/
• — --d
BOTTLEVOA SET
(2 VIALS EA)
PER SAMPLE NUMBER
END r — -
'
DESCRIPTION OF SHIPMENT
_UL_ PIECE(S) C
/ ICE CHEST
ONSISTINGO
S)- OTHER
: RflX
PERSONNEL CUSTODY RECORD
RELINQUISHED BY (SAMPLER) DATE
I/SEALED / y^NSEALED | \jQ
"[SEALED UNSEALED[~RELINQUISHED BY DATE
~1 SEALED UNSEALED]""
ES)
TIME
TIME
TIME
^ •
SAMPLED MEDIA
SI
XXXXXX'-
a
cft>E
iiolhcr
RECEIVING LABORATORYREMARKS/OTHER INFORMATION(condition ol samples upon receipt,
other sample numbers etc.)
MODE OF SHIPMENT
v .COURIE
.SAMPL
RCIALCARRIEF
R
ER CONVEYED
I"
(SHIPPING DOCUMENT NUMBER)
RECEIVED BY
— | SEALED UNSEALED f
RECEIVED BY
"[SEALED UNSEALED/^
RECEIVED BY
~~ [SEALED UNSEALED)"
REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY
DELIVER To LABREASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY
REASON FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY
7-EPA.9262(Revised 5/85)
IIIIII• Appendix E
Airbills
I_ October 2005
I
iiiiiiiii
SHIPPER'S f
COPY
^a'ssj ~t~
instructions on back. Call 1-80O-PICK-UPS (800-742-5877)
additional information.FOB WDRLCWICE EXPRESS SWPNB^S
DOCUMENTS]ONLY
Mark m'Jf in lis box ishJcrnert onlyocxlans cteuments at no conrmnad wjua
1Z OE8 10W 22 1001 270 5 SATURDAYDEUVERY
REFERENCE NUMBER
An Additional Handling Charge applies lor cenain!em». See Instructions.
BLACK & VE£TCH SPEetppjbj CORP
CITY, AND STATED ZIP CODE
KS 67701 EXPIRATION •DATE
THIRD PARTY'S COMPANY- NAME
STREET ADDRESS
STREET ADDRESS
CITY AND STATE (INCLUDE COUNTRY IF INTERNATIONAL) • LZIPCODE
0101911202609 8/00 MM
SHIPPER'S
COPY
See instructions on back. Call 1-8OO-PICK-UPS (800-742-5877)
for additional information. tvtort an'>f In Ms «K it riitmsil onrycotalns documnts d no oornmrdal value.
1Z OE8 10W 22 1001 271 4
An Additional Handling Charge applies for certainitems. See instructions.
BLACK &VEAtCH
CITY AND STATED*. it?, tt^r 'COLBf EXPIRATION
DATE
HIRD PARTY'S COMPANY NAME
STREET ADDRESS! urn
|lhttf.
CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE
CITY AND STATE ( INCLUDE COUNTRY IF INTERNATIONAL) i ZIP CODE
It^S
M-tiSDATE OF SHIPMENT
10 I Of 105
See instructions on back. Call 1-80O-PICK-UPS (8OO-742-5877)for additional information.
TRACKING NUMBER 1Z OE8 10W 22 1001 198 4
REFERENCE NUMBER
046132.0147NAME '.- TELEPHONE•
O. V.C: 785-460-0116- •COMPANY
BLACK &'VEAtCH SPEC.PRCfl CORPSTREET-ADDRESS ^ -.. ft JXO**'
500E4TH§TCZIP CODE
KS 677012:EXTREMELY3uRGENCTlELIVERYT
NAME
NICOLE ROBLEZ
TELEPHONE
913-551-5130COMPANY ' :
US EPA REGION 7 LABSTREET ADDRESS DEPT./FLR.
300 MINNESOTA AVECITY AND STATE ( INCLUDE COUMTRY If INTERNATIONAL) i ZIP CODE :
KANSAS CITY KS
ENTER "ITR"IF LETTER
WEIGHT
^J RECOVERS/THIRD PARTYS UPS Acer. NO. OR MAJOR CREDTT CARONO. EXPIRATION *j5|J
THIRD PARTY'S COMPANY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
' ''
CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE
O SHIPPER'SSIGNATURE .
DATE OF SHIPMENTill
0101811202609 6/00 M./V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IIIiIIM Appendix F
Field Logbooks
IOctober 2005
iiiiiiiiii
[ 3 en a. en en
r^:^S^-!\-
fft/J[
3
A n;.
<9ut>\
'1 —
'
W//Il(l0 Wet ;
; lW-oO
n1779-79
w// /A row (g.
er
/|/?/ii. ),/-(>$ i I ^ o, //*;
.1 US Bif\i/itn>/\iy^i"'l
• ; ' . . . - • ' • ' ^ . • • • r • : ' . . . " . ',•;*-•'•: -w^-V^1
• - ? . ' • , ' • . . • . ' , • • ' • ; ' . ' • -'"•„' "*-«.:; >v<• •? . , -> -.-;'.' *'
cm • cm cm"' C±D; cm •'. cz : c m ' . : ' . : - - ' - c ± 3 - .-"cm
S it r^ *" ?•; ' !; •• ;"j-' • :•'.;/K#i:.; '•'.. •:•;' >;-i :- *••.'...;£,;. i-''i'--. v-',-1- . - ' i i •*»"'•-,•*> •%tFi?*Tff*'S''f'St=??-' '••'•''• "c>K'1^S'-"-:-''%'i'*:J''*'''''ti^'W'1!*;!^ r'^'^S'" 'r?J6i:':;''V- •' ~'-Jt %"--- .-7 ".*"•"-;: '••• V *•••'. -'-.I ••''*••.'~ ' • ' • ' ' ' . . . . • : ' . ."'•• '':.':---.-" • - - . " ' • • « • :
: ;;:;ff |g||ljS|fe
iroc/ceo083?-
0301-
- QaMjudtzjd
®jjjdUb-76MIA/- &-S
0945-
1001- 1809
1833
1133-
1156-
<&MJlM>-1Q 0010
I J
CB3&I08.45-
, 0.932-
OB-l^.D
&&?•-: '• •• :'ljjlrj^J
113?-I14Q-
MW-1rD u
- 7! -
(TTMurrifibu
p.bb Q
10-11 -OS
..... „.5 i ! : ^ •o6
^amw&u cdbMJtM;
a±>
vdb W?-
10-11-06
-so
cub
' O
r>i
Ji i.!-
TGWTP(&(Wnd>...
CQjrdimue.
151Z-.15321
jnjas,-" T1.4G3
16851
GS8-
uO L
joaws^^jtrnJ^ajnousT^
DGWTP
Q-Du:- a
^bJ&UrrnJV\
v
10
10-12,-OScmj
i 4*-^' M~*~**-:s \J**~> cc'A'O*—' ^f
053- QMuSwdj Jrajctu® QWTP
Gwte-A
-JUMMJL
ccbWvmw • a \ i ! =
'ibbLtM&kli
> QfitfEi
10-1Q-Q5
1703-
sasnd Iv ./aasH
WJO&WJiMVLb.
IIIIII• Appendix G
Analytical Results
I
^ October 2005
9
I
iiiiiiiii
11" RPD Calculations— Ace Services Site: October 2005
I
1
1
e•viiI
i
Result of primary
Result of duplicate
Result of primary
Result of duplicate
Result of primary
Result of duplicate
Result of primary
Result of duplicate
I RPD = relative percent difference
RPD = (D1-D2)/(0.5(D1+D2))
ANALYTE = total chromiumsample analyte = <10 ug/L
sample analyte = <10 ug/L
RPD = 0%
ANALYTE = total chromiumsample analyte = <10 ug/L
sample analyte = <10 ug/L
RPD = 0%
ANALYTE = total chromiumsample analyte = 10.7 ug/L
sample analyte = 10.4 ug/L
RPD = 3%
ANALYTE = total chromiumsample analyte = 350 ug/L
sample analyte = 344 ug/L
RPD = 2%
Sample No.MW-16-D
MW-16-D-FD
Sample No.MW-2-D
MW-2-D-FD
Sample No.MW-8-I
MW-8-I-FD
Sample No.PWS-8
PWS-8-FD
RPD goal +/-20 percent for water media (BVSPC 2003b)
1
1
itii
Ace Services Site
•| LTRA Cleanup Status Report No. 5 I of 1 044720
IIiI
ft* JT.
I
I
I
I
iIiiIiiIIi
United States Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 7
901 N. 5th StreetKansas City, KS 66101
Date:
Subject: Transmittal of Sample Analysis Results for ASR #: 2775
Project ID: RS07GE
Project Description: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
From: Dale I. Bates, DirectorRegional Laboratory, Environmental Services Division
To: Robert StewartSUPR/IANE
Enclosed are the analytical data for the above-referenced Analytical Services Request (ASR) andProject. The Regional Laboratory has reviewed and verified the results in accordance with proceduresdescribed in our Quality Manual (QM). In addition to all of the analytical results, this transmittalcontains pertinent information that may have influenced the reported results and documents anydeviations from the established requirements of the QM.
Please contact us within 14 days of receipt of this package if you determine there is a need for anychanges. Please complete the enclosed Customer Satisfaction Survey and Data Disposition memo forthis ASR.
If you have any questions or concerns relating to this data package, contact our customer service lineat 913-551-5295.
Enclosures
cc: Analytical Data File.
Page 1 of 30
ASR Number: 2775 Summary of Project Information 11/01/2005
Project Manager: Robert Stewart Org: SUPR/IANE Phone: 913-551-7654
Project ID: RS07GE
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
Location: Colby State: Kansas Program: Superfund
Site Name: ACE SERVICES - GROUNDWATER Site ID: 07GE Site OU: 02
Purpose: Compliance Monitoring
October 2005 semi-annual sampling event.
Explanation of Codes, Units and Qualifiers used on this report
Sample QC Codes: QC Codes identify the type of Units: Specific units in which results aresample for quality control purpose. reported.
= Field Sample Deg C = Degrees CelsiusFD = Field Duplicate NTU = Nephelometric Turbidity Units
SU = Standard Units (pH)mg/L = Milligrams per Literug/L = Micrograms per Liter
umhos/cm = Micromhos per Centimeter
Data Qualifiers: Specific codes used in conjunction with data values to provide additional informationon the quality of reported results, or used to explain the absence of a specific value.
(Blank)= Values have been reviewed and found acceptable for use.U = The analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.
Page 2 of 30
IIiiiIiiii1iiiiiiii
ASR Number: 2775
Project ID: RS07GE
Sample Information Summary
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
11/01/2005
Sample QCNo Code Matrix
1 - _ Water
2 - _ Water
2 - FD Water
4 - Water
5 - Water
6 - Water
7 - _ Water
8 - Water
9 - Water
10 - Water
11 -_ Water
12 -_ Water
13 - _ Water
14 -_ Water
15 - _ Water
16 - Water
17 - _ Water
18 - _ Water
19 - _ Water
20 - Water
20 - FD Water
22 - _ Water
23 - _ Water
24 - _ Water
Location Description
MW-2-I
MW-2-D
MW-2-D/Field Duplicate of sample2
MW-13-D
MW-13-I
MW-15-I
MW-15-S
MW-15-D
MW-14-I
MW-17-I
MW-17-S
MW-17-D
MW-18-S
MW-18-D
MW-18-I
MW-2-S
MW-3D
MW-16-I
MW-16-S
MW-16-D
MW-16-D/Field Duplicate ofsample 20MW-7-D
OB-2-D
MW-7-I
ExternalSample No
W-MW-2-1-100405W-MW-2-D-100405W-MW-2-D-100405W-MW-13-D-100405W-MW-13-1-100405W-MW-15-1-100405W-MW-15-S-100405W-MW-15-D-100505W-MW-14-1-100505W-MW-17-1-100505W-MW-17-S-100505W-MW-17-D-100505W-MW-18-S-100505W-MW-18-D-100505W-MW-18-1-100505W-MW-2-S-100605
W-MW-16-1-100605
W-MW-16-D-100605
W-MW-7-D-100605
StartDate
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/07/2005
10/06/2005
Start EndTime Date
09:22
11:35
11:36
15:01
15:24
17:12
17:32
09:20
09:59
11:36
12:06
14:52
15:30
17:24
09:25
10:01
11:53
12:1514:50
14:51
09:08
16:46
End ReceiptTime Date
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
10/14/2005
10/11/2005
10/14/2005
10/11/2005
10/14/2005
10/11/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
Page 3 of 30
ASR Number: 2775
Project ID: RS07GE
Sample Information Summary
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
11/01/2005
Sample QCNo Code
25 -_
26 -_
27 -_
28 -_
29 -_
30 -_
31 -
32 -_
33 -_
34 -_
35 -_
36 -_
37 -_
38 -_
39 -_
40 -_41 -
42 -_
43 -_44 - _
45 -_
46 -_47 -
48 -_
48 - FD
49 - _
55 -_
56 -_
57 - _
58 -_
59 -_
60 -__
61 -__66 - _
67 -_
68 - _
69 - _
70 - _
71 - _
Matrix Location Description
Water MW-7-S
Water OB-2-I
Water OB-l-D
Water OB-l-I
Water MW-l-IWater MW-l-D
Water MW-l-SWater MW-9-I
Water MW-9-D
Water MW-9-S
Water MW-5-IWater MW-5-DWater MW-5-SWater MW-4-I
Water MW-4-D
Water MW-4-SWater MW-6-D
Water Rinsate sample
Water MW-6-IWater MW-6-S
Water MW-ll-I
Water MW-ll-DWater MW-ll-S
Water MW-8-IWater MW-8-I/Field Duplicate of sample
48Water MW-8-D
Water OB-l-SWater OB-2-S
Water MW-8-S
Water MW-12-S
Water Rinsate sample
Water MW-12-I
Water MW-12-D
Water MW-13S
Water MW-14S
Water ARW-S
Water ARW-I
Water ARW-D
Water Rinsate Blank sample
ExternalSample No
W-MW-13-S-100605W-MW-14-S-100605W-ARW-S-100605W-ARW-1-100605W-ARW-D-100605W-RIN-100605-R
StartDate
10/06/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/10/2005
10/10/2005
10/10/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
10/13/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
10/12/2005
10/12/2005
10/12/2005
10/12/2005
10/12/2005
10/12/2005
10/12/2005
10/12/2005
10/12/2005
10/12/2005
10/12/2005
10/13/2005
10/13/2005
10/13/2005
10/13/2005
10/13/2005
10/13/2005
10/13/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
Start EndTime Date
18:09
09:32
11:15
11:40
14:25
15:05
16:38
10:02
10:27
12:20
13:26
14:45
13:03
16:50
16:25
09:25
11:13
15:16
10:50
12:25
14:15
14:40
15:58
18:12
18:14
17:40
11:03
11:45
14:08
14:55
15:41
16:39
17:03
12:51
11:43
14:54
14:28
13:56
16:12
End ReceiptTime Date
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/14/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
Page 4 of 30
IIiIiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
ASR Number: 2775
Project ID: RS07GE
Sample Information Summary
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
11/01/2005
Sample QCNo Code
73 -
73 - FD
75 -_
76 -_
77 -_
78 -
79 -_
80 -_
81 -_
82 -_
83 -_
84 -
85 -_
86 -_
87 -_
88 -_
89 -
90 -_
91 -_
92 -_
93 -_
94 -_
95 -_
Matrix
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Location Description
PWS-8
PWS-8/Field Duplicate of sample73
RW-7
RW-5
EX-4S
EX- 11
EX- ID
EX-2D
EX-2I
EX-3S
EX-3I
EX-3D
EX-4I
EX-5S
EX-5I
RW-2
RW-3
RW-4
RW-6
RW-/ ^ J|X,1 7 il* l *^» '
RW-^ 8
HPMW-6S
HPMW-9S
ExternalSample No
W-PWS-8-100405W-PWS-8-100405-FDW-RW-7-100405W-RW-5-100405W-EX-4S-100405W-EX-1I-100405W-EX-1D-100405W-EX-2D-100405W-EX-2I-100405W-EX-2S-100405W-EX-3I-100405W-EX-3D-100405W-EX-4I-100405W-EX-5S-100405W-EX-5I-100405W-RW-2-100505W-RW-3-100505W-RW-4-100505W-RW-6-100505 qW-RW-I-100505W-RW-/-8100505W-HPMW-6-S-100605W-HPMW-9-S-100605
StartDate
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/04/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/05/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
Start EndTime Date
10:15
10:15
10:43
11:25
12:00
13:35
14:18
14:50
15:10
15:41
16:00
16:21
16:51
17:23
17:53
12:35
12:03
11:38
10:52
10:06
09:34
15:50
16:33
End ReceiptTime Date
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/07/2005
10/11/2005
10/11/2005
Page 5 of 30
ASR Number:2775 RLAB Approved Analysis Comments 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis Comments About Results For This Analysis
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementLab: (Field Measurement)
Method: Measurement of field parameter (no SOP)
Samples: 1- 2- 2-FD 4- 5- 6- 7-8-15-22-__29-36-44-55-_67-__76-83-_90-
Q_
1 O™
23-_30-_37-45-_56-_68-_77-84-_91-
10-17-24-_31-38-_46-_57-_69-_78-_85-92-
11-18-25-_32-_39-_47-_58-_70-_79-_86-_93-_
12-19-26-_33-_40-_48-_60-_73-_80-_87-_94-_
13-20-_27-34-41-48-FD61-73-FD81-88-_95-_
14-20-FD28-_35-_43-49-_66-_75-_82-_89-
Comments:(N/A)
Metals in Water by ICPLab: Contract Lab Program (Out-Source)
Method: CLP Statement of Work
Samples: 1- 2-1-8-15-22 -_29-36-43-_49-__61-73-_80-_87-_94-_
2-9-16-23-_30-_37-_44-55-_66-_73-FD81-88-_95-_
2-FD
17-24-31-38-_45-_56-_67-_75-_82-_89-_
11-18-25-32-__39-46-_57-68-__76-_83-_90-__
12~19-26-_33-40-_47-_58-69-_77-_84-_91-
13~20-_27-_34-_41-48-_59-_70-_78-_85-_92-_
7-14-20-FD28-_35-_42-_48-FD60-_71-79-_86-_93-
Comments:(N/A)
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementLab: (Field Measurement)
Method: Measurement of field parameter (no SOP)
Samples: !-__ 2-_ 2-FD 4-__ 5-_ 6-_ 7-_
Page 6 of 30
11ii
iPii•
ASR Number:2775 RLAB Approved Analysis Comments
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
11/01/2005
Analysis Comments About Results For This Analysis
Samples: 8-
22-_29-_36-_44-55-_67-_76-_83-_90-_
Comments:(N/A)
1 Temperature of Water by
16~23-_30-_37-_45-_56-_68-_77-_84-_
91-_
1°--24-_31-38-_46-_57-_69-_78-_85-_92-_
18-~25-_32-_39-_47-_58-_70-_79-_86-_93-_
19-~26-_33-_40-_48-_60-_73-_80-_87-_94-_
20-27-_34-
41-_48-FD61-73-FD81-88-_95-_
14-
20-FD28-.35-.43-49-.66-75-82-89-
_
Field MeasurementLab: (Field Measurement)
i
iw••I1
Method: Measurement of field
Samples: 1-
it22-_29-_36-44-_55-_67-76-83-_90-_
Comments:(N/A)
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in
2-9-
23-_30-_37-_45-_56-_68-_77-_84-_91-_
Water by
parameter
2-FD
17-~24-_31-38-_46-_57-_69-_78-_85-92-_
(no SOP)
4-
it25-_32-_39-_47-_58-_70-_79-_86-_93-_
5-
19-~26-_33-_40-_48-_60-_73-_80-_87-_94-_
6-
20-_27-34-_
48-FD61-73-FD
88-95-_
7-_
20-FD28-35-43-49-66-75-82-89-
_
—
Field MeasurementLab: (Field Measurement)
1 Method: Measurement of field
E•
1
1
1
Samples: 1-8-15 I_22-_29-_36-_44 -_
2-_Q_
1 D~
23-_30-_37-_
45-_
parameter
2-FD
10-
17-Z24-_31-38-_
46-_
(no SOP)
4-
11-18-25-_32-_
39-_47-_
5-_12-
19-Z26-_33-_
40-_
48-_
6-_13-20-_27-34-_
48-FD
7-_14-20-FD28-35-43-
49-—
Page 7 of 30
ASR Number:2775 RLAB Approved Analysis Comments 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
Analysis Comments About Results For This
Samples: 55-67-76-_83-90-_
56-_68-77-84-91-_
57-_69-_78-_85-92-_
Analysis
58-_70-79-_86-93-_
60-_73-80-_87-_94-_
61-_73-FD81-_88-95-_
66-_75-82-89-
Comments:(N/A)
Turbidity of Water by Field MeasurementLab: (Field Measurement)
Method: Measurement of field parameter (no SOP)
Samples: 29-_ 30-_ 31-_ 32-_ 33-_ 34-_ 35-36-_ 37-_ 38-_ 39-_ 40- 41-_ 43-44-_ 45-_ 46-_ 47-_ 48-_ 48-FD 49-55-_ 56-_ 57- 58-_ 60-_ 61-_
Comments:(N/A)
Page 8 of 30
IASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
I Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 1- 2- 2-FD 4-
• 1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 894 437 437 497
_ 1 Metals in Water by ICP• Chromium ug/L 406 10.0 U 10.0 U 10.0 U
1 pH of Water by Field Measurement
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiiIiiii
pH SU 6.4 6.96 6.96 5.53
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 16.52 16.62 16.62 18.78
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 3.20 7.64 7.64 8.26
Page 9 of 30
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 5- 6- 7- 8-
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/crn 473 479 581 454
1 Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 10.2 10.0 U ill 37.2
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH SU 5.77 7.24 6.96 7.33
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 24.04 15.83 19.89 15.40
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 8.27 8.29 8.31 7.68
Page 10 of 30
IASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
• Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 9- 10- 11- 12-
• 1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 679 529 895 461
~ 1 Metals in Water by ICP• Chromium ug/L 12.5 10.0 U 11.4 10.0 U
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH SU 7.22 7.28 7.23 7.56
I I Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 14.75 14.89 13.00 15.98
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field Measurementfl Dissolved Oxygen mg/L 7.66 8.44 8.23 8.34
I
I
I
iiiiiIii• Page 11 of 30
I
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 13- 14- 15- 16-
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 890 478 520 743
1 Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 10.0 U 10.0 U 10.0 U 10.0 U
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH SU 6.97 7.47 7.30 6.93
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 17.58 15.24 15.11 14.23
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 9.03 8.22 8.40 8.27
Page 12 of 30
IASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
• Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 17- 18- 19- 20-
I 1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 503 465 778 468
I I Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 10.0 U 10.0 U 10.0 U 10.0 U
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH SU 7.09 7.28 7.19 7.53
• 1 Temperature of Water by Field Measurement• Temperature Deg C 15.24 14.81 13.99 15.38
^ 1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field Measurement• Dissolved Oxygen mg/L 7.82 8.29 7.99 8.14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
iiiiI Page 13 of 30
I
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 20-FD 22- 23- 24-
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 468 424 419 668
1 Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 10.0 U 10.0 U 11.6 10.0 U
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH SU 7.53 7.46 7.58 7.29
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 15.38 15.16 7.84 14.42
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 8.14 7.80 10.08 7.21
Page 14 of 30
IASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
I Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 25- 26- 27- 28-
| 1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 633 527 417 549
II Metals in Water by ICP
Chromium ug/L 10.9 132 10.0 U 10.0 U
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH SU 7.26 7.20 7.53 7.35
I I Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 14.13 14.68 15.37 15.23
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field Measurement• Dissolved Oxygen mg/L 7.91 7.89 7.73 7.54
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• Page 15 of 30
I
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 29- 30- 31- 32-
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 1.309 0.472 1.306 599
1 Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 10.0 U 10.0 U 10.0 U 17.1
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH SU 6.61 7.49 6.65 7.10
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 15.46 15.88 15.64 14.81
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 0.12 7.28 0.32 6.87
1 Turbidity of Water by Field MeasurementTurbidity NTU -1.5 -2.9 -2.4 -1.7
Page 16 of 30
IASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
• Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 33- 34- 35- 36-
I 1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 513 805 771 434
I I Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 10.1 59.0 10.0 U 21.1
1 pH of Water by Field Measurement
IpH SU 7.34 7.22 7.35 7.55
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 15.16 21.13 13.62 15.48
_ 1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field Measurement• Dissolved Oxygen mg/L 7.69 7.16 7.30 6.96
1 Turbidity of Water by Field MeasurementTurbidity NTU -1.8 130.5 0.8 -0.2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• Page 17 of 30
I
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 37- 38- 39- 40-
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 1.198 783 424 1.153
1 Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 10.0 U 10.0 U 10.0 U 10.0 U
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH SU 7.32 7.14 7.57 7.02
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 15.14 14.84 15.32 15.20
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 7.45 6.79 7.12 6.93
1 Turbidity of Water by Field MeasurementTurbidity NTU 131.1 -0.4 -0.5 -0.9
Page 18 of 30
IASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
• Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 41- 42- 43- 44-
| 1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 0.414 0.641 577
I I Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 10.0 U 10.0 U 10.0 U 10.0 U
1 pH of Water by Field Measurement_ pH SU 7.58 7.17 7.39
• 1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 15.82 15.32 15.29
— 1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementB Dissolved Oxygen rng/L 6.91 6.91 7.36
• 1 Turbidity of Water by Field MeasurementTurbidity NTU 39.5 -1.3 0.3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• Page 19 of 30
I
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 45- 46- 47- 48-
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity
1 Metals in Water by ICPChromium
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementPH
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature
umhos/cm
ug/L
SU
DegC
602
10.0 U
7.32
16.00
472
10.0 U
7.50
16.00
725
14.2
7.16
15.94
623
10.7
7.20
16.02
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen
1 Turbidity of Water by Field MeasurementTurbidity
mg/L
NTU
6.78
-1.8
7.39
-1.9
7.27
129.8
6.77
20.3
Page 20 of 30
II
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
• Analysis/ Analyte Units 48-FD 49- _ 55- _ 56- _
* 1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 623 479 411 747
I I Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 10.4 10.0 U 10.0 U 30.3
1 pH of Water by Field Measurement
I PH SU 7.20 7.39 7.57 7.21
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 16.02 15.90 19.45 20.82
I I Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 6.77 7.33 6.71 7.31
1 Turbidity of Water by Field Measurementg Turbidity NTU 20.3 -2.6 2.8 -1.7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 21 of 30
ASR Number: 2775
Project ID: RS07GE
Analysis/ Analyte
RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results
Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
11/01/2005
Units
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity
1 Metals in Water by TCPChromium
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen
1 Turbidity of Water by Field MeasurementTurbidity
57- 58- 59- 60-
umhos/cm
ug/L
SU
DegC
jrementmg/L
NTU
669
37.6
7.00
16.87
6.36
-1.1
528
10.6
7.28
15.95
7.63
-0.7
499
10.0 U 10.0 U
7.38
19.63
7.64
-2.0
Page 22 of 30
IASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
I
I
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 61- 66- 67- 68-
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 396 814 811 1063
I I Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 10.0 U 10.0 U 10.6 1600
1 pH of Water by Field Measurement
I pH SU 7.42 7.15 7.23 6.84
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 16.02 17.17 16.80 16.99
I I Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 7.34 7.50 8.63 1.16
1 Turbidity of Water by Field Measurement^ Turbidity NTU -1.2
Page 23 of 30
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 69- 70- 71- 73-
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 902 617 690
1 Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 794 277 10.0 U 350
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH SU 6.94 7.17 6.96
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 16.51 15.89 15.00
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 3.88 7.18 7.65
Page 24 of 30
I
I
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
IAnalysis/ Analyte Units 73-FD 75- 76- 77-_
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 690 488 487 511
1 Metals in Water by TCPChromium ug/L 344 10.0 U 36.2 17.9
1 pH of Water by Field Measurement
I pH SU 6.96 7.36 7.36 8.17
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 15.00 15.10 16.26 14.96
I I Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 7.65 8.66 8.43 1.51
Page 25 of 30
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Sen/ice Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 78- 79- 80- 81-
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 673 451 500 642
1 Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 926 17.4 53.8 181
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH SU 7.25 7.46 7.11 6.25
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 15.17 15.34 15.22 14.76
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 6.83 8.31 8.32 8.40
Page 26 of 30
IIASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
• Analysis/Analyte Units 82- 83- 84- 85-—
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 821 520 511 607
I I Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 33.8 135 36.9 61.0
1 pH of Water by Field Measurement• pH SU 6.54 6.18 5.60 6.16
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 14.52 14.18 15.40 14.90
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 8.66 8.28 8.34 8.63
Page 27 of 30
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 86- 87- 88- 89-
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 798 547 427 504
1 Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 21.6 50.7 11.2 10.0 U
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH SU 6.65 7.07 7.63 7.55
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 14.73 14.96 15.02 14.98
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 8.74 8.41 8.95 8.13
Page 28 of 30
I
I
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LTRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 90- 91- 92- 93-
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 502 498 476 587
I I Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 10.0 U 10.0 U 10.0 U 29.9
1 pH of Water by Field Measurement
I pH SU 7.63 7.68 7.53 7.37
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 15.21 14.71 15.03 14.85
I I Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 8.15 8.87 8.35 8.65
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Page 29 of 30
ASR Number: 2775 RLAB Approved Sample Analysis Results 11/01/2005
Project ID: RS07GE Project Desc: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
Analysis/ Analyte Units 94- 95-
1 Conductivity by Field MeasurementConductivity umhos/cm 1231 1389
1 Metals in Water by ICPChromium ug/L 10.0 U 17.2
1 pH of Water by Field MeasurementpH SU 6.90 6.74
1 Temperature of Water by Field MeasurementTemperature Deg C 17.78 16.97
1 Total Dissolved Oxygen in Water by Field MeasurementDissolved Oxygen mg/L 0.43 0.57
Page 30 of 30
United States Environmental Protection AgencyRegion VII
901 N. 5th StreetKansas City, KS 66101
Date:
Subject: Data Disposition for ASR #: 2775
Project ID: RS07GE
Project Description: Ace Service Inc. - LIRA GW samples
From: Robert StewartSUPR/IANE
To: Dee SimmonsENSV/RLAB/CATS
I have received and reviewed the Transmittal of Sample Analysis Results for the above-referencedAnalytical Services Request(ASR) and have indicated my findings below by checking one of the boxes.
rj After reviewing the data, I have found that NO CHANGES ARE NECESSARY. Please change theASR status to 'RELEASED1 so that the electronic form of the data are available on the LAN inR7LIMS for my use. I realize that this will make these results available in read-only form to allRegion 7 employees and contractors that have R7LJMS 'Customer' account.
Q After reviewing the data, I have found that NO CHANGES ARE NECESSARY. Please change theASR status to 'PM Available' so that the electronic form of the data are available on the LAN inR7LIMS for my use only.
Q After reviewing the data, I have found that NO CHANGES ARE NECESSARY. Please DO NOTchange the ASR status to 'RELEASED' or 'PM Available' as THIS DATA IS OF A SENSITIVENATURE. I realize that this data will be archived on-line and any future reports or electronicdata dumps must be requested through the laboratory.
rj After reviewing the data, I have found that SOME CHANGES ARE NECESSARY. PLEASE MAKETHE CHANGES DETAILED IN THE ATTACHED LIST and re-transmit this data package. I realizethat if I wait more than 14 days after the date of the data transmittal the data may already bearchived and additional time may be required to make these changes.
IIIIIIg Appendix H
Quarterly Audit Report No. 7
IAugust 2005
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IIffIfIftf0
nIIIInllllIIllll
rftf
Prepared for:U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 790i" North 5th StreetKansas City. Kansas 66101
Long Term Response ActionAudit Report No. 7
Ace Services SiteColby, Kansas
August 26, 2005
EPA Contract No.: EP-S7-05-06EPA Task Order No.: 0075
BVSPC Project No.: 044720.01.49
Prepared by:FJ ?!:ACK £,Y^ATCH Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.H> M hinldinn a uunrln nl riittpfpnrp'- ^ • r
6601 College Blvd.Overland Park. Kansas 66211
!_ building £ vyof|() ol ditleience
I N i R E l W«l [ f I N I O F M A 1 I O N G O V I R N M E M "
ProfessionalEnvironmental Engineers. Inc.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents 1
1.0 Introduction .....1-1
2.0 Observations on General System Operation 2-1
2.7 Well Field 2-2
2.2 Treatment Plant 2-6
2.3 Resin Issues •. 2-77
3.0 Sampling and Record Keeping ;3-l
4.0 Eva luation of System Performance ; 4-1
5.0 Action Summary ;...5-l
IiIiiIIfIffiK. Figure 4-1 Gallons Treated vs. Chromium Concentration
I•E Appendix A - Resin information from US Filter
niiif
• Ace Services Site TC-1 44720.01.49Mm, LTRA Audit Repon No. 7
Tables
Table 4-1 Selected Flow and Chromium Concentration Data
Figures
1IIIIIIIItE
I
niiiinIE
1.0 Introduction
As part of Work Order 0075, USEPA contract no. EP-S7-05-06, Black & Veatch
Special Projects Corp. (BVSPC) is to monitor key plant operations and evaluate the plant
operator's conformance to specified requirements for system operation at the Ace
Services Site, Ground Water Treatment Plant (GWTP) in Colby, Kansas. These
evaluations or audits are to occur on a quarterly basis. The audits include a site visit to
observe the City of Colby operators and obtain key plant operating data. This report
summarizes the findings from the seventh such audit conducted on July 19 through July
22, 2005. This report covers the period from April 27 through July 20, 2005. The results
of the first audit are summarized in the Lone. Term Response Action (LTRA) Audit Report^
No. ;, dated November 10, 2003. The results of the second audit are summarized in Long
Term Response Action Audit Report No. 2, dated March 19, 2004. The results of the third
audit are summarized in Long Term Response Action Audit Report No. 3, dated July 2,
2004. The results of the fourth audit are summarized in Long Term Response Action
Audit Report No. 4, dated November 19, 2004. The results of the fifth audit are
summarized in Long Term Response Action Audit Report No. 5, dated April 22, 2005.
The results of the sixth audit are summarized in Lone Term Response Action Audit Report
No. 6, dated June 24, 2005.
Ace Services Site M 044720.01.49LTRA Audit Report No. 7
I 2.0 Observations on General System Operation
During the audit site visit (July 19 through July 22, 2005), BVSPC representatives
H arrived at the GWTP at around 7:00 A.M. each morning and did not leave the plant until
after 6:00 P.M. each evening. This allowed observation of the city operators throughout
I the regular staff hours.
The City staffing of the plant was unchanged from the last several audits. Mr. Jim
I Helus with the City of Colby Public Works Department is assigned as the full time
operator for the treatment system. Mr. Helus generally arrives at the treatment plant at
| 8:00 A.M. and spends the majority of the day tending to the plant and well field systems.
Mr. Helus is occasionally supplemented by other city staff on an as needed basis. A
I; second operator is often at the plant on Wednesdays to assist with the extra work
associated with collecting, preparing, and shipping the weekly sample splits for off-site
K laboratory analysis. Mr. Helus is responsible for system operation Monday through
^ Friday. Weekend staffing is provided by various other members of the Colby Public
E Works Department; however, Mr. Helus remains on-call for plant alarms seven days a
__ week.
B As noted in previous audits, the assignment of a single primary operator is
resulting in good follow-through on maintenance, supplies inventory, record keeping, and
H problem resolution.
mm The response to alarms during hours that the plant was not staffed was reasonably
H timely. The auto-dialer has been programmed to dial out all important alarms including
^^ tank level alarms. The auto dialer goes through a progression of phone numbers until a
•» response is obtained. Mr. Helus generally responds to all off-hours alarms.
_— The plant, office, storage, and lab areas were clean and very well organized.
II Organization of the office files and plant storage room is excellent. The operating staff
Hcontinues to express positive attitudes regarding the facility and their jobs. Mr. Helus
remains particularly well engaged in his position as plant operator and his skill levels
H regarding the more complex plant subsystems continue to improve. Mr. Helus, as well as
other plant staff, frequently call BVSPC for advice and assistance as needed.
IIAce Services Site 2-1 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 7
Specific details of system operation, including problems noted during the audit,
are provided in the following sections of this report.
2.1 Well Field
As discussed in the previous audit reports, several of the extraction wells had been
shut down to prevent drawing 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) from the Hi-Plains Co-op
plume into the ground water treatment system (GWTS). A new granular activated carbon
(GAC) treatment system installed by Kansas Department of Health and Environment
(KDHE) to remove the 1,2-DCA and other volatile organic compounds (VOC) from the
well water prior to entering the GWTP was started on August 24, 2004. Since that date
(including throughout the entire seventh audit period) all wells have been allowed to run
unless a particular well was shut down for some other reason unique to that well. There
had been numerous problems at various well locations that prevented several individual
wells from running during part or all of the fifth audit period. These are discussed in
detail in the fifth audit report. Repair and upgrade activities performed at the end of the
fifth audit period corrected all the problems in the well field and returned all wells to full
operation with the exception of wells EX-2s and EX-4s. Both of these wells were shut
down due to insufficient water level in the well. Well EX-2s has been shut down due to
lack of water since the very beginning of long term system operation and is being used as
a source of spare parts for other wells.
The entire well field was shut down on May 6, 2005 to allow the influent tank to
be drained and checked for excessive sediment buildup. No excessive buildup was noted.
The well filed was restarted later the same day.
A review of the groundwater sampling data from April 2005 showed a continuing
trend of increasing hexavalent chromium concentration in the Ace recovery well (ARW)
particularly in the shallow zone (A more complete discussion of this is provided in the
LTRA Cleanup Status report dated July 20, 2005). This area of increasing chromium
concentration is immediately up gradient from extraction wells EX-li and EX-ld. In
order to more quickly capture this contamination, the pumping rates were increased at
EX-li and Id on June 23, 2005 from 35 and 40 gpm to 60 and 70 gpm respectively. EX-
li was further increased to 70 gpm on July 21, 2005.
Ace Services Site 2-2 044720.01.49
LTRA Audit Report No. 7
II111111III
Individual well flows at the end of the seventh audit period were as follows:
Well
EX-li
EX-ld
EX-2s
EX-2i
EX-2d
EX-3s
EX-31
EX-3d
EX-4s
EX-4i
EX-5s
EX-5i
PWS-8
Total flow from
Design flow
35 gpm
40 gpm
25 gpm
1 00 gpm
1 00 gpm
25 gpm
50 gpm
75 gpm
25 gpm
100 gpm
25 gpm
1 00 gpm
125 gpm
the wells was 861
Actual flow
70 gpm
70 gpm
0 gpm (well off-low water)
86 gpm
100 gpm
20 gpm
50 gpm
75 gpm
0 gpm (well off-low water)
125 gpm
1 5 gpm
125 gpm
125 gpm
gallons per minute (gpm).
A review of sampling records shows that at the beginning of the sever
period, the hexavalent chromium concentration in the composite ground water entering
the GWTP was approximately 200 to 215 micrograms per liter (ug/L). This decreased
slightly to about 185 to 200 ug/L by the end of the seventh audit period.
Problems and anomalies noted regarding operation of the well field are described
below.
1. Well field power failure; Power was lost to wells EX-li, Id, 2i, 2d,
3s, 3i, 3d and PWS-8 mid evening on May 11, 2005. Power was
restored and the wells restarted to following morning at 7:35 am.
•I 2. Sticking lock at EX-ld well houses; The door lock at the EX-Id well
house has become difficult to operate and needs to be lubricated.
II
IIII
Ace Slices Site 2-3 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Repon No. 7
3. Clean strainers in well houses. It is recommended that the piping
strainers in all the wells be blown-down and cleaned. This was listed as
Action Item number 7 in the sixth audit report.
4. Low flow condition at well EX-2i. Beginning on November 14, 2004,
the flow rate from well EX-2i dropped from 100 gpm to a little over 80
gpm. The well continued to flow only 80 to 85 gpm throughout the
remainder of the fifth, sixth and seventh audit periods even thought the
well flow controls were set to a 100 gpm set point. A complete
discussion of this issue is provided in the fifth audit report as item 4 of
section 2.1. It was originally decided to leave the pump in operation
flowing 80 to 85 gpm and replace it if it loses another stage or the flow
drops below 80 gpm. The level, probe at well EX-21 is now
malfunctioning (see item 5) and is scheduled for replacement. Since
replacing the probe involves pulling the pump out of the well, the pump
will be repaired or replaced when the level probe is replaced
5. Level probe malfunction at wells EX-2i, EX-2d and EX-5i; The well
level probe in well EX-2i began sending a false low signal causing the
well pump to shut down on June 17, 2005. The problem was
intermittent. Investigation revealed that the probe vent line had become
disconnected from the bellows allowing condensation to contaminate
the vent line. On July 1, 2005 the level probe began intermittent
malfunction at well EX-5i. The probes at well EX-2i and EX-5i are
scheduled to be replaced in August 2005. The level probe in well EX-
2d is showing a false low reading of approximately 66 feet however it
has held steady at this value and has not caused a low level alarm.
Replacement of the level probe at well EX-2d will not be scheduled
unless the problem worsens.
6. Various control problems at well EX-5i. During the seventh audit
period, several control related problems occurred on an intermittent
Ace Services Siie 2'4 044720.0].49LIRA Audi t Report No. 7
I
I
I
I
1
II
II
basis at well EX-5i. The problems included erroneous flow meter
readings, failure of the flow control system to adequately modulate flow
from the well and communication system failures. The well pump was
operated in "hand" as needed to keep the well running. On July 19,
2005 the fiber optic system lost communication with the well
completely. A brief investigation on July 20 revealed that the fiber
optic interface card in the panel at the well house was faulty. The card
was replaced with a new one on hand in the spares inventory at the
GWTP. 100% communication was restored and all other control
functions resumed normal operation. No further problems were noted
at EX-Si.
" 7. Low water at well EX-5s. It was noted during the sixth audit that the
Mi water level at EX-5s was very low and the well was only able to sustain
™ . a pumping rate of 20 gpm. The water level at EX-5s when pumping at
•| 20 gpm was drawn down to only 6 feet above the pump. It was noted
. that this may ultimately result in pump failure from air entrained in the
B| water entering the pump as has happened at other shallow wells.
BVSPC recommended reducing the well flow from 20 gpm to 15 gpm.
9M This flow adjustment was made on July 19, 2005. At a flow rate of 15
gpm the well level was running at only 6.7 feet above the pump. It is
likely that this well will have to be shut down as has been done with
shallow wells EX-2s and EX-4s due to low water level in the well.
8. Improper valve setting at well PWS-8. During the field audit it was
_ noted that the isolation valve at well PWS-8 had been left fully opened.
mm This valve is to be left partially closed to help balance water flow and
——. allow the motor operated flow control valve to stay in a range that
•H provides good flow modulation. With the manual valve at full open the
Hautomatic flow control valve was modulated down to less than 20%
open which provides poor modulation and causes cavitation in the
valve. The manual valve was returned to the previously marked,
Ace Services Site 2-5 044720.01.49LTRA Audit Report No. 7
partially closed position which allowed the automatic flow control
valve to return to approximately 60% open. Ideal modulation range for
the automatic flow control valves is 50% to 85% open
9. Excessive dust in the well houses. The well house ventilation systems
have no filters on the air intake. This is resulting in quick accumulation
of dust in the well houses particularly during dry, high wind conditions
that are typical in Colby during many months of the year. It is
important that dust levels in the well houses be kept low to protect the
fiber optic equipment in the control cabinets. BVSPC proposed adding
a filter just inside the intake louver on the well houses to alleviate this
problem. A standard 24" x 24" furnace filter could be easily
accommodated in this location. The City of Colby plant operators were
advised to solicit bids for this modification from a local HVAC
contractor.
] 0. Open pipe end at well EX-2s: Well EX-2s has been abandon due to
low water level. The end of the pipe which connects to the common
ground water collection piping system has been left open inside the well
house. This pipe end should be capped. This was listed in item 10 of
section 2.1 in the sixth audit report.
2.2 Treatment Plant
The treatment plant ran continuously throughout the seventh audit period with the
exception of brief shut downs May 25 to 27; 2005 due to problems with the resin as well
as on May 4. June 7 and June 28, 2005 to allow for resin replacement. There were no
shut downs due to equipment failures at the plant. The treatment system was operated at
full normal capacity of 800 gpm from the beginning of the seventh audit period through
June 23. 2005 when the flow was increased to 850+ gpm to accommodate increased flow
from wells EX-l i and EX-ld (see section 2.1 above). Table 4-1 provides a day-by-day
accounting of total plant flow throughout the seventh audit period.
Ace Services Silt 2-6 044720.01.49LIRA Aud i t Repon No. 7
#IIIII1t1tIIi
uunn
The new GAC system does not appear to have had any significant impact on the
GWTS with the exception of occasional clogging of the bag filters with carbon fines
(particularly when the GAC beds are backwashed) and elimination of hexavalent
chromium loading to the GWTP for several days when a fresh GAC bed is brought on
line. On May 6, 2005 the influent tank was drained to a level of about 18 inches and
inspected for excessive build-up of carbon fines or other material. The inspection
revealed no excessive accumulation of solids in the tanks bottom. It was noted that most
of the material in the tank heel was resin. This indicates that the backwash flow rate is
too high and needs to be reduced.
Two major incidents occurred at the plant during the seventh audit period both
involving the ion exchange resin. These two incidents occurred on May 25, 2005 and
July 20, 2005. Details of these incidents and all related issues are discussed in section 2.3
below.
Overall the GWTP treated approximately 90.4 million gallons during the audit
period averaging about 1.063,000 gallons per day (gpd).
Milestones for resin management activities were as follows.
TRAIN A:
April 27, 2005 - Beginning of seventh audit period. Bed Al is lead,
A2 is lag and standby bed A3 has exhausted resin (Train A has been in
this configuration since April 5, 2005).
- May 4. 2005 - Resin is replaced in Bed A3
- May 25, 2005 - Beds advanced to put Bed A2 lead and Bed A3 lag.
- May 27, 2005 - Beds reverted to Bed Al lead and A2 lag due to bad
resin in Bed A3 (see section 2.3 below).
June 7. 2005 - Resin is replaced in Bed A3.
June 7. 2005 - Beds advanced to put Bed A2 lead and Bed A3 lag.
June 28, 2005 - Resin is replaced in bed Al
- July 20, 2005 - Beds advanced to put Bed A3 lead and Bed Al lag.
Ace Services She 2-7 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 7
July 20, 2005 - End of seventh audit period. Bed A3 is lead and Bed
Al is lag. Resin in bed A2 is exhausted. Plant is discharging to the
surface creek to rinse bed Al. This continued until July 22, 2005.
TRAIN B:
- April 27, 2005 - Beginning of seventh audit period, Bed Bl is lead, B2
is lag and standby bed B3 has exhausted resin (Train B has been in this
configuration since April 5, 2005).
May 3, 2005 - Resin is replaced in bed B3.
- May 25, 2005 - Beds advanced to put Bed B2 lead and Bed B3 lag.
- May 27, 2005 - Beds reverted to Bed Bl lead and B2 lag due to bad
resin in Bed B3 (see section 2.3 below).
- June 8. 2005-Resin is replaced in Bed B3.
- June 8, 2005 - Beds advanced to put Bed B2 lead and Bed B3 lag.
- June 28, 2005 - Resin is replaced in Bed Bl.
- July 20, 2005 - Beds advanced to put Bed B3 lead and Bed Bl lag
- July 20, 2005 - End of seventh audit period. Bed B3 is lead and Bed
Bl is lag. Resin in bed B2 is exhausted. Plant is discharging to the
surface creek to rinse bed Bl. This continued until July 22, 2005.
The status of the treatment system as of the end of the seventh audit period was
both trains operating at approximately 430 gpm with Beds A3 and B3 in lead and Beds
Al and B3 in lag service. Stand-by Beds A2 and B2 had exhausted resin. The water
quality from the discharge of Beds Al and Bl was not adequate for delivery to the City
of Colby drinking water system. The system effluent was diverted to the surface
discharge until July 22 when the resin in Beds Al and Bl rinsed out and the effluent pH
stabilized above 7.0. Details of the resin related problem encountered during the seventh
audit period are provided in section 2.3 of this report.
A few problems and anomalies were noted regarding plant operation during the
audit period. These are described below.
Ace Services Site 2-8 044720.01.49LTRA Audit Report No. 7
n
iiiiiii
1. Resin quality issues. There were two incidents during the seventh
audit period when the effluent water quality from a pair of lag beds that
had just been put on line was inadequate for use as drinking water. This
issue is discussed in detail in section 2.3 of this report.
2. Incomplete installation of piping modifications. During the sixth field
audit measurements were taken to design an alteration to the bed
discharge piping which would add a valve just upstream of the resin
trap. This would allow the trap to be isolated and pulled out for
cleaning in a matter of minutes. BVSPC completed the design of this
alteration and made arrangements for fabrication of the new piping
pieces. All the new piping pieces and hardware were shipped to the
GWTP. By the end of the seventh audit period the installation of the
modifications was complete on 4 out of 6 beds except that the bolt
isolation sleeves were not installed as they should have been.
H 3. Damaged conductivity meters and probes. As was noted in the fourth
audit report, the conductivity meters on both ion exchange trains were
H flashing error and out of range. As noted in the fifth audit report, it was
determined that the conductivity measurement probes were ruined
|PI because they had not been kept wet when the treatment trains are
drained. Plans were made to order new probes plus new hot tap probe
B mounts that will allow the probes to be pulled while the system is still
operating and under pressure. At the time of the sixth field audit, this
modification had not yet been done, primarily due to delays in acquiring
the new probes and equipment from Pedrotti Controls. By the end of
the seventh audit period, the new probes and pipe fittings had been
received at the GWTP but the equipment had not yet been installed.
This was action item 2 in the sixth audit report.
Ace Services Si.c 2-9 04.720.01.49LIRA Audil Report No. 7
4. Mismatch of plant flow meter totalizers. During review of the
treatment plant flow records from the fifth and sixth audits was noted
that the monthly flow totals for the two treatment train influent flow
meters was approximately 500.000 to 700.000 gallons less than the total
of the well field flow meter (FM-1). This is also noted in the data from
the seventh audit. During the sixth field audit investigations showed no
leaking valves or other apparent causes for this discrepancy. During the
seventh audit further investigation revealed that the influent flow meter
for train B (FE-10201) was indicating a flow rate that was
approximately 20 gpm below the actual flow to the train. This was
verified by comparing the readings on this flow meter to the lead bed
flow meter, the lag bed flow meter and the train effluent flow meter.
All the flow meters matched with the exception of FE-10201. The 20
gpm differential would account for as much as a 860,000 gallon
monthly difference depending on how many hours the plant is operated
/ during a given month. Beginning with the month of August 2005
individual train flows will be recorded using data for the train effluent
flow meters FM-3A and FM-3B which were verified to be properly
calibrated.
Significant upgrades or changes in the treatment plant during the seventh audit
period included modification of four of the ion exchange beds discharge piping to
facilitate quick cleaning of the resin strainers. The other two will be modified during the
eighth audit period. The hot taps for the conductivity probes will also be installed during
the eight audit period.
Operator follow-through to address problems at the plant has been excellent. Ten
items were listed in section 2.2 of the sixth audit report. All items have either been
completely resolved or resolutions are in-progress.
Ace Services She 2-10 044720.01.49LIRA Audi! Report No. 7
II
2.3 Resin Issues
Late in the afternoon of May 25, 2005 the ion exchange beds were advanced to
place standby beds A3 and B3 into lag service. Fresh Purolite A-300 resin had been
placed in these beds by US Filter on May 3 and 4, 2005. Early in the evening of May 25
the City of Colby public works department received complaints from residents of
"foamy" water. A quick investigation revealed that the water passing out of lag Beds A3
and B3 was effervescent and was at a pH of less than 6.0. The plant was immediately
shut off. A slight downward pH shift is normal when new beds are put on line as the
bicarbonate in the raw water reaches equilibrium on the resin. This shift has been seen
every time the beds have been advanced at the GWTP and it has always been limited to a
few tenths of a pH unit, returning to neutral in a day or two. The pH had never dropped
below the drinking water limit of 6.5 until beds A3 and B3 were placed on-line on May
25.
The manufacturing process for the ion exchange resin used at the GWTP involves
the use of very strong acids including hydrochloric acid (HCL) when placed in the
chloride form as is done for the GWTP. It was assumed that the resins in beds A3 and B3
were not adequately rinsed to remove all the acids. Subsequent testing conducted by US
Filter later confirmed this assumption (see Appendix A).
As noted above, the plant was shut off during the evening of May 25, 2005. US
Filter was contacted during the morning of May 26. 2005 and arrangements were made to
remove the resin from Beds A3 and B3 and replace it with new resin that had been tested
to assure it had been rinsed properly. After consultation with EPA and KDHE, the plant
was restarted on May 27. 2005 by reverting back to running Al and Bl as lead beds and
A2 and B2 as lag beds. Even though lead Beds Al and Bl were mostly expended and
were allowing hexavalent chromium breakthrough of approximately 60 ug/1 with an
influent concentration of approximately 200 ug/1, the beds were still removing about 70%
mm of the chromium. The relatively unloaded lag beds A2 and B2 easily removed the
™" remaining chromium. The system could be safely run this way for several weeks if
mm needed. Even though the risk of exceeding the required effluent standard for hexavalent
™ chromium was very slight, the discharge of the GWTP was directed to the surface rather
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
II
IIAce Services Si.e 2-11 044720.01.49LIRA Audii Rcpon No. 7
than to the city drinking water system until new resin could be placed in beds A3 and B3
and effluent quality verified.
US Filter performed a 16 hour soak test for pH and total organic concentration
(TOC) on all of the lots of Purolite A-300 in inventory following May 25. The data
indicated that there was considerable variability from lot to lot and that three lots had a
pH lower than 6.0 and the TOC varied from 34.5 mg/1 to as high as 446.5 mg/1 (see
Appendix A). This data suggests that the resin manufacturing process was producing
inconsistent results with some lots entirely unsuitable for a drinking water application
without further processing and/or rinsing.
US Filter filled two 600 cubic foot tanker loads of new Purolite resin after testing
each resin lot to assure acceptable quality. The fresh resin was trucked to the plant to
replace the unacceptable resin in beds A3 and B3 on June 7 and 8, 2005. The ion
exchange trains were advanced to put beds A2 and B2 in lead service with A3 and B3 in
lag service as soon as the new resin was put into the beds. There were no water quality
issues when the fresh resin beds were put in service on June 7 and 8, 2005 and discharge
to the city drinking water system was resumed.
Following this incident directors from US Filter met with BVSCP and EPA to
discuss new QC procedures to prevent a future occurrence of this problem as well as to
discuss a new resin service contract which included the option to supply Dow resin to the
GWTP in lieu of the Purolite product. US Filter's in-house testing of Dow SAR resin
indicated much less variability from lot to lot and much lower TOC values (see Appendix
A). The conclusions reached at the meeting were that each resin lot would be tested for
pH and TOC prior to shipment to the GWTP and that no resin lot with a pH below 6.5 or
a TOC level in excess of 40 mg/1 would be included in the shipment.
On June 28. 2005 the spent resins in beds Al and Bl were replaced with fresh
resin. Each lot that comprised these resin loads were to have been soak tested for pH and
TOC as agreed. When the beds were again advanced on July 20, 2005 to place the new
resin in beds Al and Bl into lag service a large pH swing to below 6.0 accompanied by
color throw and effervescence was once again observed in the water leaving the new lag
beds. The GWTP was diverted to surface discharge so that none of effervescent, low pH
water was placed into the city drinking water system. A quick investigation revealed that
Ace Services Siic 2-] 2 044720.01.49LIRA Audii Report No. 7
US Filter had passed the lot-by-lot pH and TOC testing down to Purolite. US Filter had
• only done testing of a sample of the composite load. When US Filter's sampling
procedures were investigated it was clear that the sample collection method did not
• obtain a representative composite sample. The pH leaving bed Al was substantially
lower than the pH leaving bed Bl, once again demonstrating considerable lot to lot
• variability in the resin. The pH swing and effervescence were not as severe as the May
25 incident and it was believed that the new resin would rinse out fairly quickly.
• Consequently it was decided to leave the resin in service and continue to discharge to the
surface until the resin rinsed out and the pH returned to neutral. The pH climbed slowly
• over the following 36 hours finally reaching 7.0 on both trains by 5:00 am on July 22. At
that time the GWTP was switched back to city water discharge. Approximately 2 million
• gallons of groundwater was run through the two beds before neutral pH was reached.
As noted above, a new resin service contract is being negotiated. In order to
• assure the quality of future resin deliveries, the new contract will require a substantial
increase in lot by lot resin testing and analytical work prior to shipment to the GWTP.
I] This will include full 21 CFR 173.25 testing protocols in addition to in-house 16 hour
soak tests for pH and TOC. Negotiations for the new service contract were under way as
KJ of the end of the seventh audit period. In addition to the new resin QC requirements, new
procedures have been established at the GWTP to switch GWTP effluent to surface
K discharge prior to advancing resin beds and switch back to city discharge only after the
effluent quality has been verified.
•n
nnn
„ . <--,„ 2-13 041720.01.49Ace Services Sue ^ ' -1
LTRA Audi! Repon No. 7
IIIIIIIIiII
IIIIII
3.0 Sampling and Record Keeping
As part of the audit, the in-plant records kept by the City operators were reviewed
for completeness and conformity to requirements. During the review, emphasis was
placed on water flow and chromium concentration data that are critical to evaluation of
treatment system performance. The daily records were well organized in notebooks kept
at the plant. The daily records were organized by month and date and were complete and
easy to access. The City operators have continued to enter the flow meter totalizer
readings and sample analysis results in Excel spreadsheets to facilitate trend tracking and
quick data retrieval. The sample record sheets include free chlorine results now that the
discharge to the city water system is active.
The operators have continued to fill out the new GAC system log sheet each day.
This new log sheet records critical flow and pressure data for the new GAC system.
The City operating staff has done an excellent job with the sampling and record
keeping requirements during the seventh audit period. The only significant irregularity
noted in the audit or subsequent review of records was that all of the flow data had been
entered into the spread sheets with the date shifted one day later so that, for example, the
zero flow condition on May 26, 2005 was recorded as zero flow on May 27, 2005.
Recommendations and/or improvements regarding plant sampling are as follows:
•
]. End-of-service laboratory' sample. BVSPC had previously advised the plant
operators that a sample is to be collected and sent for off-site laboratory
^_ analysis when a resin bed is taken out of service due to chromium
IB breakthrough to provide dependable end of service results. Recently, when
•
on-site sample results indicate that one of the lead resin beds show break
through, the operators have been leaving the bed in service until the following
Wednesday before removing the bed from service so the that the required end-
of-service sample can be taken as one of the regular weekly Wednesday lab
samples. This practice is acceptable so long as lead bed effluent hexavalent
chromium concentration does not exceed 60 ug/L. In the event that this level
is exceeded prior to the Wednesday lab sample collection, BVSPC
Ace Services She 3-1 044720.01.49LIRA Audi t Report No. 7
recommends thai the bed be taken out of service and the confirmatory end-of-
service laboratory sample be collected as an additional sample at that time.
2. Sample transfer methods for on-site analysis. BVSPC has previously
recommended that the plant operators use pre-calibrated disposable pipettes or
pipettors to transfer the precise correct volume of sample from the large
sample collection jars to the small vials used for sample analysis in the
spectropholometers. The plant operators instituted this change in procedures
during the seventh audit period.
There were no other significant changes regarding plant sampling and record
keeping during the seventh audit period.
Ace Sen-ices Site 3-2 044720.01.49LIRA Audi t Report No. 7
IIIIII1I
4.0 Evaluation of System Performance
The new GAC system constructed by KDHE was started on August 24, 2004
(during the fourth audit period). Data were again closely monitored during the seventh
audit period to determine if there were any significant impacts on the GWTS as a result
of the GAC system being on line. The only day-to-day impacts noted were the
occasional loading of carbon fines on the bag filters and the additional head pressure
required of the extraction pumps to push through the GAC beds. When a fresh GAC bed
is placed into service, the fresh GAC removes the majority of the hexavalent chromium
from the ground water for a period of several days.
The ability to capture and control the chromium plume in the ground water is
periodically assessed via sampling and ground water elevation measurement. These data
are analyzed and the findings summarized in semi-annual Cleanup Status Reports. The
most recent report (Cleanup Status Report Number 4, dated July 20, 2005) indicates that
the extraction wells are providing good plume containment and capture.
^ / Selected flow and sampling data from April 27, 2005, through July 20, 2005, are
presented in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 also shows the amount of hexavalent chromium
B removed by the treatment system. As shown in Table 4-1, the concentration of
hexavalent chromium in the raw water entering the treatment system during the seventh
jfi audit period began at about 200 ug/1 in late April and slowly dropped only slightly to
— about 190 ug/1 by late July.
0 The data show that the system treated 90.4 million gallons from April 27, 2005,
through July 20. 2005: 45.46 million gallons in Train A and 44.91 million gallons in
Train B. A total of 72.45 kilograms (kg) (159.73 pounds) of chromium were removed
^— during this period. Four beds of ion exchange resin (Beds Al. A2, Bl and B2) reached
!• exhaustion during this period as shown in Table 4-1. The resin performance for each of
__ the exhausted beds is shown below:
H_« Bed Al: 27.74 million gallons: 43.82 Ibs chromium: 36.14 gr/cf *
II Bed.Bl: 26.75 million gallons: 42.27 Ibs chromium: 34.86 gr/cf*
_- Bed A2: 30.13 mill ion gallons: 51.68 Ibs chromium: 42.62 gr/cf *
Ace Services Siic 4-] 044720.01.49LIRA Audi l Kcpon No. 7
II
Bed B2: 30.11 million gallons: 53.58 Ibs chromium: 42.54 gr/cf *
* gr/cf = grams of chromium per cubic foot of resin
The relative performance data from the previous periods are shown below along
with the data for Beds Al, A2. Bl and B2 from this audit period. Data from the early
periods are shown as an average per 550 cubic foot bed of resin.
Time Period
Performance test:
First audit period:
Quantity of
Water Treated
20.5 million gal:
27.0 million gal:
Second audit period: 32.5 million gal:
Third Audit Period: 32.3 million gal:
Fourth Audit period:
Bed A3:
BedB2
BedB3
Fifth Audit period:
BedAl
BedBl
BedA2
BedB2
Sixth Audit Period:
Bed A3
BedB3
Seventh Audit Period:
BedAl 27.74 million gal
BedBl 26.75 million gal
BedA2 30.13 mill ion gal
BedB2 30.11 million gal
31.1 million gal:
31.1 million gal:
33.9 million gal
25.72 million gal
25.35 million gal
40.37 million gal
30.71 million gal
32.04 million gal:
35.08 million gal:
Chromium held
On resin
121.4 gr/cf*
93.6 gr/cf*
51.2 gr/cf*
41.9 gr/cf*
71.3 5 gr/cf*
34.28 gr/cf*
29.53 gr/cf*
75.1 gr/cf*
88.18 gr/cf*
90.81 gr/cf*
73.06 gr/cf*
57.67 gr/cf*
63.87 gr/cf*
36.14 gr/cf*
34.86 gr/cf*
42.62 gr/cf*
42.54 gr/cf*
* gr/cf = grams of chromium per cubic foot of resin
Ace Services SiteLIRA Audi! Report No. 7
4-2 044720.01.49
IIII[I
9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
The chromium holding capacity of the resin is expected to decrease with
diminishing influent bexavalent chromium concentrations due to the lower equilibrium.
This is clearly seen in the data above as well as in Figure 4-1. More gallons of water are
treated with the same 550 cubic feet of resin but at diminishing resin holding capacity.
During the entire period of time covered by the second and third audits, the wells
with the highest chromium concentrations were shut down awaiting design and
completion of the GAC system. During that time, chromium concentrations entering the
GWTP were averaging only around 120 to 150 ug/L. Once the GAC system was brought
on line in late August 2004 and all the extraction wells were restarted, the influent
chromium concentrations jumped up to as high a 7.00 ug/L and have been dropping
steadily since but the chromium concentration is still holding above the low levels seen in
the second and third audit periods. The affects of this can be seen in the higher grams per
cubic fool holding capacity of the resin late in the fourth audit period (Bed A3) and
throughout the fifth audit period. Chromium concentration in the influent ground water
continued to drop during the seventh audit period to around 190 ug/L by the end of the
period which is only a little higher than the very low levels seen during the second and
third audit periods and very similar to the concentration during the sixth audit period.
Note that the total gallons treated per bed during the sixth audit period are very similar to
the results during the second and third audit periods. The total gallons treated by each
bed during the seventh audit period are substantially lower than during second, third and
sixth periods, particularly Beds Al and Bl, even though the influent chromium
concentrations were similar. There is no apparent reason for this poor resin performance.
As noted in section 2.3 above, there have been some serious quality problems with the
resin supplied to the GWTP in recent months. This may be related to the poor resin
performance, however more study is needed.
As the hexavalent chromium concentration drops, a point is eventually reached
where the gallons treated by a given amount of resin will no longer increase. This is due
to the presence of other anions in the influent water that take up resin exchange capacity.
The data presented above as well as in Figure 4-L suggest that a 550 cubic foot volume
of resin cannot treat more than 31 to 34 mill ion gallons of Colby ground water regardless
<--,„ 4-3 044720.01.49Ace Services Site *t ->LIRA Audi t Rep°n No- 7
of hexavalent chromium concentration. Bed A2 in the fifth audit period is an obvious
exception, treating over 40 million gallons at a fairly high chromium loading rate. A
possible explanation is that the bed was loaded with more than the usual 550 cubic feet of
resin. Each bed has a total volume of 1100 cubic feet and is intended to run only half full
of resin to allow plenty of head space for air bump and backwash operations. If 650 to
700 cubic feet of resin were loaded into the bed there would be no indication of the extra
resin except a slightly higher pressure drop through the bed. A review of the pressure
drop data during the time that Bed A2 was in lead position does in fact show a pressure
drop that is consistently 20% to 30% greater than the other bed in the same train. Based
on the data it is very likely that Bed A2 contained 650 to 700 cubic feet of resin during its
run in the fifth audit period. This data point is not included in Figure 4-1 since it is not
representative.
Figure 4-1 is a plot of gallons of water treated by an ion exchange bed vs. the
average chromium concentration of the water treated by the bed before significant
chromium breakthrough. This figure very clearly depicts the trends and limits noted
above. Beds Al and Bl from the seventh audit period do not fit the clear pattern
establish previously, but as noted above there were resin quality concerns that are likely
responsible for this offset. As seen in Figure 4-1, the gallons of water treated increases as
the chromium loading decreases in almost a linear relationship. However, once the
average chromium concentration in the GWTP influent water drops below about 300
ug/L, no more increase in the gallons treated per bed is seen. Every bed with an average
chromium influent concentration below 350 ug/L treated between 31 and 35 million
gallons of water (except during the seventh audit period during which resin quality
problems were encountered) with no correlation to chromium concentration. This can
now be used as planning tool for scheduling bed change-outs. Unless the influent
chromium concentrations again rise above 350 ug/1. each bed can be anticipated to treat
33 +/- 2 million gallons of water.
Ion exchange is often used as a polishing process in water treatment because it is
very cost efficient compared to other treatment technologies at low contaminant
concentrations. The relatively low concentration of hexavalent chromium seen in the
composite influent groundwater is an excellent application for ion exchange. The total
Ace Services Sue 4-4 044720.01.49LIRA Audii Repon No. '
IIIII1ffffIIfllllllllllll
resin cost including transportation and disposal was 0.155 cents per gallon of water
treated for the seventh audit period. This is up from 0.130 cents per gallon from the sixth
audit period when the average chromium loading was essentially the same and it is
further evidence of the poor resin performance during the seventh audit period. This is
still a significant reduction from 0.210 cents per gallon from the performance test and
0.166 cents per gallon from the first audit period when average influent chromium
concentrations were higher. This diminishing cost as the chromium loading drops
demonstrates the efficiency of the ion exchange process in this application. Labor and
utility cost data are not available at this time to allow determination of the total cost per
gallon to treat the extracted ground water.
Ace Services Site 4-5 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 7
Table 4-1Selected Flow and Chromium Concentration Data
Ace Services Site
Date
27-Apr-05282930
Hexavalent ChromiumAt sample location SC-1Henna unit
(ug/L)
Totals for month
ContinentalLabs (ug/L)
205205205205
TRAIN AGallonsTreatedx 1000
545610573559
1742
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.4230.4740.4450.4341.776
TRAINSGallonsTreatedxlOOO
526592556541
1689
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.4100.46004320.4201.721
RemarksA1 & B1 lead, A2 & B2 lag
Ace Services SilfLIRA Audi! Repon #~ 4-6 044720
I
IIIIIIfIffI0
nHHIIII
Table 4-1Selected Flow and Chromium Concentration Data
Ace Services Site .
Date
1-May-052345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031
Hexavalent ChromiumAt sample location SC-1Hanna unit
(UQ/L)
ii
Totals for month
ContinentalLabs (ug/L)
205205205202202202202202202202216216216216216216216212212212212212212212215215215215215215215
TRAIN AGallonsTreatedX1000
5885615635695915794985655955316195645685/956557155456757657358056353161251 1
0663581562577560
16534
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.4560.4360.4370.4350.4520.4430.3810.4320.4550.4060.5060.4610.4650.4740.4620.4670.4530.4550.4620.4600.4660.4520.4260.4910.420.0000.5400.4730.4580.470.45
13.65
TRAIN BGallonsTreatedxlOOO
57054554552257353548354857851459754655156054755553854856055556544515950
6556545554
1597
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.4430.4230.4230.3990.4380.4090.3690.4190.4420.3930.4880.447
• 0.4510.4580.4470.4540.4400.4400.4500.4460.4500.4370.4110.4770.4090.0000.5350.45E0.4430.45^0.441
13.19(
Remarks
Switched to A2 and B2 lead•
Reverted to A1 and B1 lead•
'
Ace Services SheLTRA Audit Report "7
4-7 014720
Table 4-1Selected Flow and Chromium Concentration Data
Ace Services Site
Date
1-Jun-052345678910111213141516171819202122
2324252627282930
Hexsvalent ChromiumAt sample location SC-1Hanna unit
(ug/L)
Totals for month
ContinentalLabs (ug/L)
185185185185185185185208208208208208208208208208208208208208208185185185185185185185194194
TRAIN AGallonsTreatedx 1000
562581581547568612552584587560578588558548575556587582569580553518576578563576575535596606
1656S
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.3940.4070.4070.3830.3980.4290.3870.4600.4620.4410.4550.4630.4400.4320.4530.4380.4620.4580.4480.4570.4360.3630.4040.4050.3940.4040.4030.3750.4380.44
12.74
TRAIN BGallonsTreatedxlOOO
544562562529549592532565570541560569540555558539568563551561535502556559545555515458
1602
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.3810.3940.3940.3710.3850.4150.3730.4450.4490.4260.4410.4480.4250.4370.4400.4250.4470.440.43
• 0.440.420.350.390.390.380.390.390.360.390.43
12.32
Remarks
Switched to A2 and B2 lead
Ace Services Siie
LTRA Audit Report #7 4-8 044720
IIIIIIIfffIIJn
Table 4-1Selected Flow and Chromium Concentration Data
Ace Services Site
Date
1-Jul-0523456789101112131415
. 1617181920
Hexavalent ChromiumAt sample location SC-1Hanna unit
(ug/L)185219212212190213219198180192153189201203193197204183195192
Tot.'ds for month
ContinentalLabs (ug/L)
TRAIN AGallonsTreatedX1000
588520514536554548443545634568583575536612578551568615558577
10615
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.4120.4310.4130.4300.3990.4420.3670.4090.4320.4130.3380.4120.4080.4700.4220.4110.4390.4260.4120.4208.306
TRAIN BGallonsTreatedxlOOO
571503497517534528572572627620632626580666629603620665604623
11218
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.4000.4170.3990.4150.3840.4260.4740.4290.4270.4510.3660.4480.4410.5120.4600.4500.4790.460.440.458.73
Remarks
switched to A3 and B3 lead
II
H
II
IIAce Services SiteLIRA Audit Report #7 4-9 044720
Figure 4-1Gallons treated vs chromium concentration
40
~ 35 -
1 30O
= 25
co
20
15
=5 10O
5
0
0 200 400 600 800
Chromium (ug/L)
1000 1200
Page 4-10
II
p
5.0 Action Summary
The following is a list of recommended actions or changes to improve system
• operation or record keeping procedures based on observations made during the seventh
audit. This is a summary list. This list also includes any needed equipment repairs or
• adjustments identified during this audit. Further details can be found in the body of this
audit report. It is noted that action items 2, 6 and 7 are carried over from the sixth audit
I report.
1. Lubricate the lock at well house EX-ld.
• 2. The conductivity probes on both trains need to be replaced and the meters
recalibrated.
I/ 3. Replace the level probes at wells EX-5i and EX-2i.
V /4. Repair or replace the pump at well EX-2i
V5. Cap the open pipe end at well EX-2s.
^ 6. Complete the installation of the new valves and piping spool pieces needed to
^ allow removal and cleaning of the resin trap without draining the vessel.
0 7. Clean out the piping strainers in all the well houses.
nIIIIIIII
8. Install filters in all the well house ventilation inlets as described in section 2.1,
item 9.
9. Switch to using flow meters FM-3A and FM-3B to record flow through each
treatment train as described in section 2.1, item 4.
Ace Services Si.e 5-1 044720.01.49LIRA Audi t Report No. 7
IIIf
APPENDIX AP
RESIN INFORMATIONFROM US FILTER
HH
11IIII
11
't=s S^TZS.E* 14950 HEATHROW FOREST PKWY SUITE 250= = =?^=^= HOUSTON TX 77032
A Siemens Business
June 8, 2005
Mr. Ken WyattBlack and Veatch6601 College BlvdOverland Park, KS 662 11
Subject: Purolite A-300E resin incident at Colby, KS Chrome removal site.
Dear Ken:
Enclosed are our findings in regards to the foamy water and low pH incident at the Colby, KS Chromeremoval site. As we discussed on the phone, we need to be more cautious in the future, and establishappropriate QA/QC expectations.
Attached is Purolite's findings and corrective action statement. We believe in addition to the improvedQA/QC work done by Purolite, USFilter will need to check the resin lots and verify the resin meets therequirements. We will require Purolite to provide Certificates of Analysis showing the pH and if requested
the TOO levels.
USFilter has performed some analytical testing of the Purolile resin lots that were in Rockford prior toloading them into the tankers for the replacement load. The results are enclosed. In addition, we haverequested their recommendations based on the data. They recommended USFilter to use all lots that testedabove 6.5 pH units. Based on the above, four lots were rejected for pH and one for being the wrongmaterial (macroporous anion). In addition, we performed composite TOC testing on each tanker weshipped this week..
You requested USFilter to investigate alternate sources of resin for this application. We have contactedDow Chemical for pricing on their MSF approved resin for this application (Dowex SAR). Since we usethis material for internal applications, we do have significant TOC data on this resin. We have included the
results in this report.
Thank you for your understanding in this matter, and your continued support of USFilter. We look forwardto establishing the proper QA/QC" requirements for this application, and continuing to support The City ofColby, the EPA and Black and Veatch.
Re
Robert LokenNorth American Sales DirectorAftermarket Business CenterService and Products Group
Enclosure: .
1IIIIIIII
*HHHHliH
'—§='£1; ' 14650 HEATHROW FOREST PKWY SUITE 250HOUSTON TX 77032
A Siemens Business
Colby, KS PuroJite Resin Event:
Event:
On May 26, 2005, USFilter received a call from The City of Colby that they had received complaints froma few residents of foamy water coming from their taps. In addition the site was seeing pH 5.9 coming outof the new Purolite beds.
USFilfer Response:
We examined the remaining Purolite A-300E lots (19) for pH, resin type, foam and resin color. Some lotswere further examined for conductivity and TOC. We requested samples of the tanker retains from the siteand core samples of the resin in the vessels. Based on the initial test results., we also investigated applyingour standard cleaning procedures on the worst lot in the lab.
We contacted Purolite to initiate a root cause corrective action report. We shared our early findings withthem and requested replacement resin.
Testing Parameters:
Composite resin samples were taken from each Purolite resin Lot.
The pH testing was on a known amount of resin added to a clean beaker with a known amount of softenedwater. A stir bar was added and the water tested for pH. In addition, a few lots were tested on RockfordCity water and Brine. In addition, a few lots conductivity was tested.
Visual examination of the water and resin for foaming and resin color were also performed.
Total Oreanic Carbon (TOC) testing was performed on selected lots and the composite. The test procedureconsists of a known amount of resin placed in a clean glass sealed container with a known amount of Dlwater for 16 hours at 1 00°F. The water extract is tested for TOC level.
Results:
The results of our testing are summarized in table 1 of this report. As expected the resin lowered the pH asthe alkalinity absorption dispJaces the chJoride ion. This is typically. 0.5 pH units. Four lots were found tohave low pH values (2273/04/6, 2049/04/6, 2182/04/6, and 2279/04/6). One lot was determined to bemacroporous anion (46/04/6).
The tanker retain samples from Colby, lots AIW050422AI and A] W050225A1, results were 6.2 and 6.5respectfully. The vessel samples pH was 7.0 - 7.2.
The TOC results from the lowest pH lots were 253.7 ppm and 446.5 ppm. These values are much higherthan expected and they both had a color throw. We typically expect the TOC level to be below 100 ppm;
=• = ~ "=1 ==" 1/!550 HEATHROW FOREST PKWY SUITE 250— — ~ HOUSTON TX 77032
A Siemens Business
and in electronics applications below 50 ppm for OH form Type 1 resins. Since Type II resin is less stablethan type 1, we see higher TOC levels in the OH form. Since the chloride form is significantly more stablethan the OH form, we would expect the results to be lower than the OH form for the same type of resin.The TOC results in table 2 indicate the Purolite resin is not as clean as the Dow based resin, and may needadditional cleaning.
Conclusion:
Purolite shipped resin to Rockford had not been properly rinsed for the application. The test resultsindicate residual HCL and organic manufacturing by-products were still in the resin. Purolite hasidentified a need on their end to analyze for these parameters instead of rinsing based on gallons throughput Purolite will need to supply improved resin lots and certification the resin meets the pH and otherestablished parameters.
Corrective Action:
Since QA/QC specification parameters had not been established for this application, Purolite nor USFiltertested the resin for pH or TOC contribution. Since this is a potable water application, proper precautionswill need to be implemented. .We believe the corrective action is to establish QA/QC parametersappropriate for the application. In addition, the resin will need to be tested by USFilter or an outside labfor verification.
/USFilter does not have GCMS instrumentation to perform complete NSF-61 testing, and is proposing pHand TOC parameters be used. We do not guarantee that these two tests will prevent another type of issue,but it will address the pH and foaming issue (residual organic manufacturing products). Please keep inmind that Purolite supplies 18-25 lots to make 1,200 CF of resin. If outside testing is required, the numberof lots will increase the costs of analytical testing. Black and Veatch and the EPA will need to establishthe appropriate testing parameters for this application.
Alternate resin or additional post manufacturing processing of the resin may be required, depending on theQA/QC requirements established by Black and Veatch and the EPA. USFilter will test the resin or processthe resin within the limits of our capabilities.
iIiiiiif
i
Table 1
Colby Resin Issue
Lot Number
Soft Water
City Water
Brine
Retain Samples
287/04/6
2367/04/6
249/04/6
55/04/6
2051/04/6
2072/05/6
2340/04/6
2073/05/6
2117/04/6
2295/04/6
4753/04/6
46/04/6
229/04/6
2273/04/6
2049/04/6
2)82/04/6
2279/04/6
544/04/6
63/04/6
pH(soft
water)7.5n/an/a
6.76.5
6.86.5
6.66.96.97
7.17.17.27.2
7.)5
6.3S^
5.7
5.7
6.66.7
pH(ci ty
\vater)n/a
7.5n/a
6.76.5
6.86.6
PH(brine)
n/an/a5.9
6.77.6
7.96.7
Conduct iv i ty
(us)
589--
-*
--
-------
748967
769138]
785
738765
TOCmg/LC)
253.7
446.5
.
Resin
(type)
---
GG
GG
GGGGGGG
MP
GG
GG
G
GG
Foam
none
verylightsome
veryliehtsome
minor
some
some
minor
some
minor
some
rrunor
some
some
verylight
verylightrrunor
verylight
Other
Macroporousresin.Confirmedas aru'on.
Darkercoloredresin; colorthrow.Confirmedas anion.
Darkercoloredresin; colorthrow.Confirmedas anion.Sample wasre-tested forpH value.
Colby ResinSamplesSoft Water
Train A
Train BA1W050422A1
A1W050225A1
Processed ResinSampleSoft Water2182.04.6
New Lot2051.04.64633.05.34619.05.3
New Resin TankersAIW050606A1A1W050603A1
7.4
7
7.26.2
6.5
7.57.2 138.6 '
4043.6
34.5
41.6108.3
some
some
foamy
light
Most foamof allsamples.Odor present
No colorthrow
//
I
IIi1IIf
TOC Resin AnalysisTable 2
f
f
f
I
*
*
*0
A-244 (Dow Mfg.)15.8
1.36.96.6
10.83.67.9
C*y
7.33.9
- 4 .6
3.35.8
/ 7 R/ 7'6
5.25
4.57.7
42.61.93.9
5.693.18
AverageS Dev
AverageS Dev
Dow AveragDow S Dev
SAR
11.35.15.27.97.95.86.9
18.911.318.96.7
9.635.04
7.004.26
A-300E
4041.634.5
38.73.72
I
I1IIIfif
I
*nHii
ION EXCHANGE RESINS
June 2, 2005
Robert LokenU.S. Filter4669 Shepherd TrailRockford,IL61105
Dear Mrr Loken,
We have investigated your complaint filed with Purolile's Terry Heller concerning thelow pH and foaming in A300E resin. A root cause analysis has found that the problem isrelated to the final rinsing steps employed in the manufacturing process.
The process requires rinsing with hot Dl water to a pH endpoint of 6.5 or greater. This isdone to remove residual organics and acids used in production of the resins. In reviewingthe process it was found that this target was routinely achieved within a certain volume ofwater. The procedure was thus changed to require only the set volume of water as therinse step. Unfortunately at some point the pH monitoring was discontinued.
The pH monitoring siep and limit has been reinstated.
In addition, all batches wil l be retested in Philadelphia prior to shipment to U.S. Filter forpH and foam residuals.
The material presently in your inventory that is over pH 6.5 should perform properly inservice.
We apologize for the problems caused by the process change. Please be assured that wewill take every step necessary to prevent this or similar problems in the future.
Regards,
Joe D'AlessandroTechnical ManagerPurolite USA
Cc: T. HellerD. BrodieA. Gotthardt
The P i i r o l i n - C u j u p i i n v . l > i i W - i n n l ' H n i - T i x l i ( . . 'nrporai ion. ISO M.nuimci i l Kosi l . IJala Cyimvd. 1 'A800-.V.VI50U <i l lMJl>S-J l i i . ' )H l-'ai f i](J-4W-M.v9 . - - 1 1 1 1 1 I I : jn l i i&'- imrol i i f l . 'SA. fom »i-h>ilr: www.nurnli i f lJSA.fom
IIiiiig Appendix I
Quarterly Audit Report No. 8
I November 2005
I
iiiiiiiiIi
iffiIiiiiiiiiiiii
Prepared for:U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 7901 North 5th StreetKansas City, Kansas 66101
Long Term Response ActionAudit Report No. 8
Ace Services SiteColby, Kansas
November 18, 2005
EPA Contract No.: EP-S7-05-06EPA Task .Order No.: 0075
BVSPC Project No.: 044725.01.49
Prepared by:Fl PkACK ?!,YIATCH Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.^_4 bmldmo a iMnrmof difference™ r J f
6601 College Blvd.Overland Park. Kansas 66211
|_ building a Qf|(J of difference'
E N E R G Y W A T E R I N F O R M A T I O N G O V E R N M E N T
ProfessionalEnvironmental Engineers. Inc.
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 1-1
2.0 Observations on General System Operation 2-1
2.1 Well Field 2-2
2.2 Treatment Plant , 2-6
2.3 Resin Issues 2-75
3.0 Sampling and Record Keeping 3-1
4.0 . Evaluation of System Performance 4-1
5.0 Action Summary 5-1
tf
*iifriiiii_ Figures
I Figure 4-1 Gallons Treated vs. Chromium Concentration
I£ Appendix A - Resin pH Run-in Charts
I
1
I
i
I
Tables
Table 4-1 Selected Flow and Chromium Concentration Data
Ace Services Sile TC-1 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
0
f
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.0 Introduction
As part of Work Order 0075, USEPA Contract no. EP-S7-05-06, Black & Veatch
Special Projects Corp. (BVSPC) is to monitor key plant operations and evaluate the plant
operator's conformance to specified requirements for system operation at the Ace
Services Site, Ground Water Treatment Plant (GWTP) in Colby, Kansas. These
evaluations or audits are to occur on a quarterly basis. The audits include a site visit to
observe the City of Colby operators and obtain key plant operating data/This report
summarizes the findings from the eighth such audit conducted on October 11 through
October 14, 2005. This report covers the period from July 21 through October 12, 2005.
The results of the first audit are summarized in the Long Term Response Action Audit
Report No. 1, dated November 10, 2003. The results of the second audit are summarized
in Long Term Response Action Audit Report No. 2, dated March 19, 2004. The results of
the third audit are summarized in Long Term Response Ad ion Audit Report No. 3. dated
July 2, 2004. The results of the fourth audjt are summarized in Long Term Response
Action Audit Report No. 4, dated November 19, 2004. The results of the fifth audit are
summarized in Long Term Response Action Audit Report No. 5, dated April 22, 2005.
The results of the Sixth audit are summarized in Long Term Response Action Audit
Report No. 6, dated June 24, 2005. The results of the seventh audit are summarized in
Lonz Term Response Action Audit Report No. 7, dated August 26, 2005.
Ace Services Site 1-1 044720.01.49LTRA Audit Report No. 8
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
2.0 Observations on General System Operation
During the audit site visit (October 11 through October 14, 2005), BVSPC
representatives arrived at the GWTP at around 7:00 A.M. each morning and did not leave
the plant until between 5:00 and 6:00 P.M. each evening. This allowed observation of the
city operators throughout the regular staff hours.
The City staffing of the plant was unchanged from the last several audits. Mr. Jim
Helus with the City of Colby Public Works Department is assigned as the full time
operator for the treatment system. Mr. Helus generally arrives at the treatment plant at
8:00 A.M. and spends the majority of the day tending to the plant and well field systems.
Mr. Helus is occasionally supplemented by other city staff on an as needed basis. A
second operator is often at the plant on Wednesdays to assist with the extra work
associated with collecting, preparing, and shipping the weekly sample splits for off-site
laboratory analysis. Mr. Helus is responsible for system operation Monday through
Friday. Weekend staffing is provided by various other members of the Colby Public
Works Department; however, Mr. Helus remains on-call for plant alarms seven days a
week.
As noted in previous audits, the assignment of a single primary operator is
resulting in good follow-through on maintenance, supplies inventory, record keeping, and
problem resolution.
The response to alarms during hours that the plant was not staffed was reasonably
timely. The auto-dialer has been programmed to dial out all important alarms including
tank level alarms. The auto dialer goes through a progression of phone numbers until a
response is obtained. Mr. Helus generally responds to all off-hours alarms.
The plant, office, storage, and lab areas were clean and very well organized.
Organization of the office files and plant storage room is excellent. The operating staff
continues to express positive attitudes regarding the facility and their jobs. Mr. Helus
remains particularly well engaged in his job as plant operator and his skill levels
regarding the more complex plant subsystems continue to improve. Mr. Helus, as well as
other plant staff, frequently call BVSPC for advice and assistance as needed.
Ace Services Site 2-1 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
IIIIIIIiiiiiiiiiiii
Specific details of system operation, including problems noted during the audit,
are provided in the following sections of this report.
2.1 Well Field
As discussed in the previous audit reports, several of the extraction wells had been
shut down to prevent drawing ] ,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) from the Hi-Plains Co-op
plume into the ground water treatment system (GWTS). A new granular activated carbon
(GAC) treatment system installed by Kansas Department of Health and Environment
(KDHE) to remove the 1,2-DCA and other volatile organic compounds (VOC) from the
well water prior to entering the GWTP was started on August 24, 2004. Since that date
(including throughout the entire eighth audit period) all wells have been allowed to run
unless a particular well was shut down for some other reason unique to that well.
Wells EX-li and EX-3d were shut off and the flow from wells EX-Id and PWS-8
were significantly reduced for several days early in September 2005. This was done to
temporarily reduce the hexavalem chromium concentration in the raw water entering the
GWTP to extend the run time of beds A3 and B3 until September 14 to support resin tests
scheduled for the week of September 14, 2005. See section 2.3 of this report for details
of the resin testing.
There had been numerous problems at various well locations that prevented
several individual wells from running during part or all of the previous (fifth) audit
period. These are discussed in detail in the fifth audit report. Repair and upgrade
activities performed at the end of the fifth audit period corrected all the problems in the
well field and returned all wells to full operation with the exception of wells EX-2s and
EX-4s. Both of these wells were shut down due to insufficient water level in the well.
Well EX-2s has been shut down due to lack of water since the very beginning of long
term system operation and is being used as a source of spare parts for other wells.
Water level probes failed at wells EX-2i, EX-4i and EX-5i during the eighth audit
period, however these wells were kept operating in manual mode. The flow rates at wells
Ex-li and EX-Id were increased during the seventh audit period in response to rapidly
rising hexavalent chromium concentrations in the nearby Ace Recovery Well. No flow
rate adjustments were made during the eighth audi t period with the exception of well EX-
Ace Services Site 2-2 044720.01.49LTRA Audit Report No. 8
fffff1IIIIIIIIIIIII
2d being returned to it's design pumping rate of 100 gpm following repair of the well
pump. Individual well flows at the end of the eighth audit period were as follows:
Well
EX-li
EX- Id
EX-2s
EX-2i
EX-2d
EX-3s
EX-3i
EX-3d
EX-4s
EX-4i
EX-5s
EX-5i
PWS-8
Design flow
35 gpm
40 gpm
25 gpm
100 gpm
100 gpm
25 gpm
50 gpm
75 gpm
25 gpm
1 00 gpm
25 gpm
1 00 gpm
125 gpm
Actual flow
70 gpm
70 gpm
0 gpm (well
100 gpm
1 00 gpm
20 gpm
50 gpm
75 gpm
0 gpm (well
125 gpm
15 gpm
125 gpm
125 gpm
off-low water)
off-low water)
Total flow from the wells was 875 gallons per minute (gpm). Note that this is the
highest total pumping rate since the plant began operation.
A review of sampling records shows that at the beginning of the eighth audit
period, the hexavalent chromium concentration in the composite ground water entering
the GWTP was approximately 210 to 220 micrograms per liter (ug/L). This decreased
slightly too about 185 ug/L by the end of the eighth audit period.
It has been noted that the chromium concentrations in wells EX-4i, EX-5i and
EX-5s are below the Clean-up goal of 100 ug/L. The results of samples collected from
these wells in April 2005 ranged from less than 15 ug/L up to 43 ug/L. Field analysis
conducted in the lab at the GWTP during the eighth field audit of samples from these
three wells yielded very similar results. Wells EX-4i and EX-5i have been pumping at
125 gpm, which is over the design pumping rate of 100 gpm since the western wells were
temporarily shut down due to possible DCA contamination in October of 2003. As has
been noted in several previous audit reports, the influent concentration of hexavalent
Ace Services Site 2-3 044720.01.49LTRA Audi t Report No. 8
chromium entering the GWTP has dropped so low that resin life is a direct function of
water flow. BVSPC has proposed to EPA that a surge pumping technique be considered
for wells EX-4i, EX-5i and EX-5s to reduce total water flow to the plant and extend the
resin life.
Problems and anomalies noted regarding operation of the well field are described
below.
1. Low flow condition at well EX-2i. Beginning on November 14, 2004,
the flow rate from well EX-2i dropped from 100 gpm to a little over 80
gpm. The well continued to flow only 80 to 85 gpm throughout the
remainder of the fifth, sixth and seventh audit periods even thought the
well flow controls were set to a 100 gpm set point. A complete
discussion of this issue is provided in the fifth audit report as item 4 of
section 2.1. It was decided to leave the pump in operation flowing 80 to
85 gpm and replace it if it loses another stage or the flow droped below
80 gpm. The malfunctioning level probe at well EX-2i was replaced on
August 23, 2005. Since this work required pulling out the well pump, a
new pump was installed at that time. The new pump is operating as
expected and the well has pumped at the 100 gpm design rate since the
new pump was installed. Replacement of this pump was listed as
Action Item 4 in the seventh audit report.
2. Low water at well EX-5s. It was noted during the sixth audit that the
water level at EX-5s was very low and the well could no longer sustain
the design flow rate of 25 gpm. The flow from well EX-5s was reduced
to 20 gpm during the sixth audit period and then further reduced to 15
gpm at the end of the seventh audit period. It was noted during the
eighth filed audit that the water level at EX-5s when pumping at only
15 gpm is drawn down to only 5 feet above the pump. This may
ultimately result in pump failure from air entrained in the water entering
the pump as has happened at other shallow wells. BVSPC recommends
that the well pump be shut off as has been done at wells EX-4s and 2s
Ace Services SiteLIRA Audi t Repon No. 8
2-4 044720.01.49
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
until the water level rises enough to allow pumping without
endangering the pump. The existing pump in well EX-5s cannot be
turned down much below 15 gpm without damaging the pump motor.
The semi-annual ground water evaluation will assess the effect of the
lower flow rate on plume capture.
3. Level probe malfunctions at wells EX-2i. EX-2d. EX-4i and EX-5i:
The level probes at wells EX-2i and EX-5i began malfunctioning during
the seventh audit period and were replaced during the eighth audit
period on August 23, 2005. The level probe at well EX-4i failed on
August 17, 2005. A replacement probe was ordered and installation is
scheduled for late October, 2005. The level probe at well EX-2'd has
been showing a false low reading of about 66 feet for several audit
periods however it has held steady and has not caused a pump
shutdown. Replacement of the level probe at well EX-2d will not be
scheduled until the problem worsens. Note that replacement of the
level probes at wells EX-2i and EX-5i was listed as Action Item 3 in the
seventh audit report.
4. Excessive dust in the well houses: As was noted in the seventh audit
report, the lack of filtration for the well house ventilation intakes is
allowing excessive dust to enter the well house during dry windy
weather (which is quite common in Colby, KS). The excessive dust is a
threat to the fiber optic equipment in the well house panels. In the
seventh audit report, BVSPC recommended that the intake louver skirts
be modified by a local HVAC contractor to accommodate a standard
24" x 24" furnace filter between the louver and isolation damper. A bid
was solicited from McKee Inc. for this work. The bid price was $125
per well house. McKee is scheduled to begin this work on October 12,.
2005. This was listed as Action item 8 in the seventh audit report.
Ace Services Site 2-5 044720.01.49LTRA Audit Report No. 8
I1I 2.2 Treatment Plant
• The treatment plant ran continuously throughout the eighth audit period. The
™ treatment system was operated at full normal capacity of 800 + gpm throughout the sixth
• audit period. Table 4-1 provides a day-by-day accounting of total plant flow throughout
™ the eighth audit period.
• The new GAC system does not appear to have had any significant impact on the
GWTS with the exception of occasional clogging of the bag filters with carbon fines
• (particularly when the GAC beds are backwashed) and elimination of the hexavalent
chromium loading to the GWTP for several days when a fresh GAC bed is brought on
line. There were no fresh GAC beds brought on-line during the eighth audit period.
There were two major upsets during the previous (seventh) audit period involving
the ion exchange resin. These events are detailed in section 2.3 of the seventh audit
report. Several investigations and filed trials were conducted during the eighth audit
period to determine a permanent resolution to the resin issues. These results of these
investigations are presented in section 2.3 of this eighth audit report.
The only serious event during the eighth audit period was the appearance of a
significant water hammer when the city water transfer pumps shut off. This problem is
described in detail below.
Overall the GWTP treated approximately 101.5 million gallons during the eighth
audit period averaging about 1,208,000 gallons per day (gpd).
Milestones for resin management activities were as follows.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAIN A;
- July 21, 2005 - Beginning of eighth audit period. Bed A3 is lead, Al
is lag (Train A was just placed in this configuration the previous day -
July 20, 2005).
- August 16, 2005 - Resin is replaced in Bed A2 (note: Purolite A300
resin, cycled and placed 60% in bicarbonate form).
Ace Services Sile 2-6 044720.01.49LIRA Audil Report No. 8
JIPfffIfIIIIIIIIIIII
September 14, 2005 - Beds advanced to put Bed Al lead and Bed A2
lag. (Note: This bed advancement should have occurred on
September 7, 2005 when hexavalent chromium breakthrough reach 60
ug/L, however it was delayed one week to allow for testing)
September 22, 2005 - Resin is replaced in Bed A3 (Note: Dow SAR
resin, untreated).
October 12, 2005 - End of sixth eighth period. Bed Al is lead and
Bed A2 is lag. Resin in bed A3 is fresh, untreated Dow SAR.
TRAIN B:
July 21, 2005 - Beginning of eighth audit period, Bed B3 is lead, Bl is
lag (Train B was just placed in this configuration the previous day -
July 20, 2005).
- August 15, 2005 - Resin is replaced in bed B2 (note: Purolite A300
resin, cycled and placed 60% in bicarbonate form).
- September 14, 2005 - Beds advanced to put Bed Bl lead and Bed B2
lag. (Note: This bed advancement should have occurred on September
7, 2005 when hexavalent chromium breakthrough reach 60 ug/L,
however it was delayed one week to allow for testing)
- September 22, 2005: _ Resin is replaced in Bed B3 (Note: Dow SAR
resin, placed 40% in bicarbonate form).
- October 12, 2005 - End of sixth eighth audit period. Bed Bl is lead
and Bed B2 is lag. Resin in bed B3 is fresh Dow SAR, 35%
bicarbonate.
The status of the treatment system as of the end of the eighth audit period was
both trains operating at approximately 440 gpm with Beds Al and Bl in lead and Beds
A2 and B2 in lag service. Stand-by Beds A3 and B3 had fresh resin. As noted in the
seventh audit report, the resin service contract with US Filter (USF) has been renewed
and required a switch from Purolite A300 to Dow SAR resin. The resin in beds A3 and
Ace Services Site 2-7 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No 8
B3 are the first loads of Dow SAR resin to be delivered to the plant under the new
contract. Bed A3 was loaded with pure, untreated Dow SAR however bed B3 was loaded
with Dow SAR that had been partially converted from the chloride to the bicarbonate
form. This was done as the last in a series of experiments regarding the pH of the
effluent water when a fresh resin bed is first placed into service. Further details are
provided in section 2.3 of this report.
A few problems and anomalies were noted regarding plant operation during the
audit period. These are described below.
1. Resin quality issues. There were two incidents when the effluent water
quality from lag beds that had just been placed in service was not
suitable for use as drinking water due to low pH excursions and organic
contaminants. One incident occurred on May 25, 2005 during the
seventh audit period and the other occurred on July 20, 2005 just at the
beginning of the eight audit period. Details regarding these incidents
including resolutions for this problem are provided in section 2.3 of the
seventh audit report as well as section 2.3 of this eighth audit report.
2. Low backwash flow rate. The plant operators had noted that the
backwash flow rate had dropped below 200 gpm. The rate had been
well over 300 gpm in the past. BVSPC recommended changing the bag
elements in the backwash filter. It then became apparent that the plant
operators were not aware thai there was a backwash filter provided in
the plant. A quick inspection reveled that the bag elements were badly
clogged. This was not surprising considering that these filter bags had
never been changed in the life of the plant. BVSPC instructed the plant
operators on how to change the backwash filter bags and pointed out
that this unit uses the same filter bag as the plant influent feed bag
filters. Changing the filter bags corrected the low flow condition.
Ace Services Site 2-8 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
ffffIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
3. Incomplete installation of piping modifications. During the sixth field
audit measurements were taken by BVSPC to design an alteration of
each ion exchange vessels discharge piping. The design allowed for the
installation of an isolation valve just upstream of the resin traps that
would allow removal of the traps for cleaning without draining the
entire vessel. By the end of the seventh audit period, 4 of the 6 resin
vessels had been altered and all the parts were on hand to finish the
installation. By the end of the eighth audit period, all six valve sets had
been installed however installation of the bolt isolation sleeves was not
complete. Experience with the new arraignment has been very positive.
Prior.to this modification, cleaning a resin trap required a full day.
With the modification in place, this activity requires less than 30
minutes.
4. Damaged conductivity meters and probes. As was noted in the fourth
audit report, the conductivity meters on both ion exchange trains were
flashing error and out of range. As noted in the fifth audit report, it was
determined that the conductivity measurement probes were ruined
because they had not been kept wet when the treatment trains are
drained. Plans were made to order new probes plus new hot tap probe
mounts that will allow the probes to be pulled while the system is still
operating and under pressure. At the time of the sixth field audit, this
modification had not yet been done, primarily due to delays in acquiring
the new probes and equipment from Pedrotti Controls. By the end of
the seventh audit period, the new probes and pipe fittings had been
received at the plant but not yet installed. As of the end of the eighth
audit period, the installation had still not been done. This was listed as
action item 2 in the fifth, sixth and seventh audit reports.
5. Mismatch of plant flow meter totalizers. During review of the
treatment plant flow records from the fifth, sixth and seventh audits it
Ace Services Site 2-9 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
was noted that the monthly flow totals for the two treatment train
influent flow meters was approximately 500,000 to 700,000 gallons less
than the total of the well field flow meter (FM-1). This is also noted in
the data from the eighth audit. As described in the seventh audit report
an investigation conducted during the seventh field audit revealed that
the influent flow meter for train B (FE-10201) was indicating a flow
that was approximately 20 gpm below the actual flow. Beginning with
the month of August 2005 the plant operators were instructed to record
individual train flows using the train effluent meters FM-3A and FM-
3B which had been verified to be properly calibrated. A review of the
flow data since August of 2005 shows that using the readings from FM-
3A and 3B has eliminated the discrepancy. The data from the eighth
audit period shows less than a 0.1% variance.
6. New procedures for resin management. No representative of BVSPC
has ever been present at the GWTP when new resin has been delivered
to the plant. During recent discussions with plant and US Filter
personnel it came to light that when the fresh ion exchange resin is first
transferred into the process vessels, the USF and plant operators were
performing a very brief and inadequate backwash. The plant operators
were then performing a more extensive backwash as the resin is brought
on line several weeks later. This is not the correct procedure. A
complete backwash should be conducted when the new resin is first
placed in the process vessel to remove the resin fines created during
transportation and sluicing of the resin. When the resin is placed on-
line later, only rinse and recycle steps are needed. The plant operators
were not performing complete backwash as new resin was first loaded
primarily because they were not aware that the backwash step can be
conducted on the standby bed with the process train in full operation.
They had thought that the process train had to be shut down and they
were trying to minimize the downtime. This misunderstanding has
Ace Services Site 2-10 044720.01.49LTRA Audit Report No. 8
fl
I
I
I
IIII
IIII
III
I
I
I
been cleared up and the correct resin management procedures are now
being followed. The correct procedure is as follows: 1) When the resin
is first transferred into the standby process bed, a full 9000 gallon
backwash should be conducted followed by a minimum of 15 minutes
settling time and then a 9000 gallon rinse. 2) When the resin is later
placed on-line, the operators should conduct a 9000 gallon rinse
followed by a 9000 gallon recycle and then into lead service. No
backwash is required.
7. Water hammer and related damage to chlorine loop. Mid-evening on
October 11, 2005 the city water transfer pump TWP-1 started and then
abruptly stopped. When the pump stopped a water hammer of extreme
intensity occurred in the city water discharge system. The pressure
wave from the water hammer was so strong that it traveled out into the
city water distribution system and reflected back to the plant and then
back out to the distribution system then once again back to the plant
making three full cycles before it dissipated. The BVSPC site manager
happened to be at the GWTP when this occurred. The energy of the
. pressure wave significantly displaced the large 8" and 10" welded steel
piping that makes up the city water discharge system and was sufficient
to literally shake the; building. A brief investigation into the cause of
the hammer revealed that the city water tower had reach "full" level just
as the transfer pump had spooled up to full speed. When the water
tower reaches full, the city control system removes the "city requests
water" command from the GWTP PLC thereby shutting down the
pump. There is a speed controlled isolation valve (CV-6) on the city
water discharge from the GWTP that is set to close slowly when the
pump shutdown command is given. The PLC is programmed to delay
the pump shut down for several seconds to allow this speed controlled
isolation valve to reach near full closed thereby significantly reducing
the flow rale before the pump shuts off. The express purpose of this
Ace Services Site 2-11 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
control sequence is to assure there are no abrupt large changes in flow
which could produce a water hammer. The isolation valve is also
speed controlled on opening to prevent sudden increase in flow rate to
the city system. The only plausible explanation thus far identified for
the extreme water hammer is that the valve was still completing the
opening cycle when the request for water was suddenly taken away. By
the time the valve could complete venting the opening side of the
actuator, reverse direction and close, the time delay on pump shut down
had elapsed and the pump shut off with the valve still significantly
open. It should be noted that each of the transfer pumps is provided
with a triple duty discharge valve that operates as a non-slam check
valve. When the transfer pump shut down that evening, the triple duty
valve slammed closed and bounced off its seat several times. The triple
duty valves are equipped with a spring behind the sealing disk which is
intended to prevent exactly this kind of bounce. It is not clear weather
the non-slam, non-bounce features of the triple duty valve failed or if
(he force of the wafer hammer was simply too great to be resisted even
by a properly functioning valve. It should be noted that even if all the
events occurred as proposed above the force of the water hammer
experienced that evening was still far in excess of what would be
expected even in the worst of circumstances. In fact during the original
GWTP system lesling conducted in the summer of 2003, the transfer
pumps were stopped.numerous time with the isolation valve full open
and the resulting water hammer was much less intense and never had
enough energy to reflect out through the distribution and return. The
City of Colby has added a new production well that pumps into the
same main as the GWTP. This may be contributing to the problem
since the velocity in this main has increased but it would not account
for the intensity of the shock that occurred on October 11, 2005. On
October 12, 2005 the transfer pumps were cycled again and a water
hammer resulted although of much less intensity than the evening
Ace Services Site 2-12 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
0before. The pumps were cycled several more times to allow for
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
refining the isolation valve speed control and pump shut down sequence
in an effort to minimize the water hammer. The intensity of the water
hammer was reduced significantly (to a soft bump) but it could not be
eliminated completely. When the city discharge system was finally put
back on-line there would occasionally be a somewhat more intense
hammer even though nothing was changed at the GWTP The severe
intensity of the water hammer which occurred on October 11, 2005
damaged several elements of the chlorine booster loop which have
subsequently failed including the following:
- Chlorine Ejector. The Chlorine, ejector is made from PCV. The
ejector body cracked when the water hammer hit creating a slow water
leak through the crack. The water in the chlorine loop is chlorinated to
a fairly high concentration as it passes through the ejector. The leak
was sufficient to cause the chlorine alarm in the chlorine shed to trip,
however the water is not sufficiently chlorinated to produce a
dangerous atmosphere. The A new chlorine ejector was ordered on
October 12, and was received and installed on October 13 allowing the
city water discharge to resume operating.
Ball valve union nut. The day after the intense water hammer
occurred while the transfer pumps were being cycled for testing, A
union nut on the PVC true-union style 2" ball valve in the chlorine
booster loop broke completely apart resulting in a 2" opening in the
system spraying water with full city water pressure behind it. The
loop was isolated to stop the flow. A new valve was ordered which
was received and installed by October 14, 2005. It is assumed that the
union nut was damaged in the very intense water hammer event the
evening prior but didn't fail until the next day.
- Fitting in buried pipe of chlorine loop. On October 27, 2005 a fitting
in the below ground portion of the chJorine Joop failed. Once again h
is assumed that the buried fitting was initially damaged in the incident
Ace Services Site 2-13 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
IIII1IIIIIIIIII
I4I
on October 11, 2005. The location of this pipe failure is not
accessible. It was decided to reroute the chlorine loop entirely inside
the GWTP. This will relocate the chlorine ejector from the chlorine
shed to inside the GWTP. This is acceptable because the chlorine gas
feed line to the ejector requires vacuum created by the ejector to flow
any chlorine. All the pressurized elements of the chlorine loop will
remain out in the chlorine shed. The relocation of the ejector to inside
the plant was approved by KDHE BOW.
The chlorine loop is the weak spot in the GWTP city water discharge
system. The loop is Schedule 80 CPVC to provide resistance to high
concentrations of chlorine. The other elements of the piping system
are welded steel and butt fusion welded SDR 11 HOPE and are much
less prone to failure from a pressure surge. Following the third failure
of a chlorine loop element on October 27, 2005 consideration was
given to adding a surge arrester in the loop to protect this weak point.
At the time of writing of this eighth audit report, EPA is considering
this proposal. Estimated cost is approximately $15,000.
Significant changes or upgrades to the treatment plant during the eighth audit
period included modification of the last two ion exchange beds discharge piping to
facilitate quick cleaning of the resin strainers. A switch was made to Dow SAR ion
exchange resin during the eighth audit period to hopefully improve resin performance and
reduce problems as new resin is brought on line. Further discussion is provided in
Section 2.3. Upgrades planned for the ninth audit period include modification of the
chlorine loop and addition of hot taps for the conductivity probes.
Operator follow-through to address problems at the plant has been excellent.
Ace Services Sile 2-14 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Repon No. 8
I
IfIIfIIIIIIIIIIII
2.3 Resin Issues
Section 2.3 of the seventh audit report summarized two significant water quality
incidents related to poor resin quality. The first incident occurred on May 25, 2005 as
standby beds A3 and B3 were placed into lag service. Once the beds were on-line the
effluent water was noted to be foamy, cloudy and had a distinct organic odor. In addition
the pH of the effluent water shifted down to less than 6.0. The GWTP was reverted back
to running with beds A2 and B2 as lag beds until replacement resin was loaded into beds
A3 and B3 on June 7 and 8, 2005. There were no water quality issues when these beds
were brought on line. Subsequent testing of the resin that produced the foamy water
revealed extremely high concentrations of organics that had not been rinsed from the
resin following manufacturing. When standby beds Al and Bl were placed into lag
service on July 20, 2005 the effluent water was once again foamy, cloudy and had an
odor. The pH shift was once again below 6.0. A decision was made to let this water
rinse-in while discharging the effluent to the surface stream. The two new lag beds (Al
and Bl) required approximately 2 million gallons of rinse before the pH equalized. The
lot by lot total organic concentration (TOC) testing performed by US filter included lots
of Purolite A300 that the resin service contract for the GWTP then called for as well as
Dow SAR resin. Both of these resins are strong base anion resins in chloride form and
are functional equivalents for removal of hexavalent chromium. This data showed the
Dow resin to be much cleaner than the Purolite resin that had been delivered to the plant
(this data is included as Appendix A to1 the seventh audit report). The contaminants in the
Purolite resin were suspected to be the cause of the foaming, odor and color throw. The
large pH excursions associated with these two incidents had not been noted before at the
GWTP and would not be the explained by high TOC levels in the resin. As of the end of
the seventh audit period, negotiations were underway with US Filter (USF) to switch
resin supply to the Dow SAR. In addition, new quality control (QC) requirements were
placed on USF to conduct a 16 hour soak test for TOC on every batch of resin. In
addition the proposed new resin contract would require full 21 CFR 173.25 testing
protocol for leachable organics.
Ace Services Site 2-15 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
IIIIIIIIII
Iiliii
The information in the paragraph above is presented in greater detail in section
2.3 of the seventh audit report. Investigations into the resin issues continued throughout
the eighth audit period. Following the July 20 incident, Both Purolite and USF sent
representative to the GWTP to take samples of the raw groundwater entering the ion
exchange process on August 4, 2005. It was Purolite's contention that the problem was
not with their resin but that the incoming water quality had significantly changed. The
results of the raw water samples taken on August 4, 2005 demonstrated that had been no
substantial change in any of the influent water quality parameters with the sole exception
of lower hexavalent chromium concentration. Following this testing, negotiations were
finalized on the new resin service contract with USF. The new contract requires the
provision of virgin Dow SAR resin and a 16 hour soak test for TOC on every resin batch
prior to delivery to the GWTP with a provisional limit of 10 ppm. In addition, the
contract requires that the first ten batches of Dow SAR be tested in accordance with 21
CFR 173.25 (FDA testing protocols) to establish a relationship between the 16 hour soak
test results and the full FDA protocol. These first ten batches will be used to establish a
permanent limit on TOC concentration from the 16 hour soak test. Following this initial
period, one batch of resin will be tested by FDA protocols at least twice annually to
verify that the soak test data continues to provide complete assurance that the resin is
suitable for use in a drinking water system. The first two batches of Dow SAR resin were
delivered to the GWTP and loaded into beds A3 and B3 on September 22, 2005. The 21
CFR 173.25 testing yielded less than 1 ppm TOC for both batches. The 16 hour soak test
produced TOC levels of 1.0 ppm for one batch and 3.0 on the other. In short this resin is
extremely clean.
In order to better understand the pH shift several tests were conducted at the
GWTP. Continuous flow column tests of both Purolite A300 and Dow SAR resin were
performed at the GWTP on September 12 through 16, 2005. Three small test columns of
Purolite A300 were tested, each pretreated in a different way. One column was rinsed
only, one column was cycled (exhausted and then regenerated back to the chloride form)
and rinsed. The third column was cycled, rinsed and then placed completely in the
bicarbonate form. The most plausible explanation for the large downward pH shift was
Ace Services Siie 2-16 044720.01.49LTRAAudi l Report No. 8
ffffIIIIII1IIIIIII
that the fresh resin was removing alkalinity from the raw water until equilibrium was
reached. It was theorized that by first placing the resin in the bicarbonate form, enough
bicarbonate would come off of the resin during the initial run-in to buffer the downward
pH shift. In addition to the three small test columns of Purolite A300, a single column of
Dow SAR was tested. The Dow SAR resin had not been treated in any fashion and was
exactly as it came from Dow's manufacturing process. The column tests were conducted
to simulate the conditions that occur when a fresh resin bed is first brought online in lag
service. The rinsed Purolite resin dropped to a pH of 6.27 after a water flow through the
column equal to 33 resin bed volumes (BV), the cycled and rinsed Purolite resin
exhibited less shift dropping to pH 6.45 at 33 BV. The Purolite resin that was cycled and
placed in the bicarbonate form actually caused an upward pH shift to 7.24 immediately at
start-up. The untreated Dow SAR resin exhibited the most extreme pH shift, dropping to
a low of pH 4.8 at about 10 BV followed by a rapid recovery to 6.45 at around 100 BV.
The three test columns that were not in the bicarbonate form all reached a pH of 7.0 by
260 BV. The bicarbonate form resin stayed above 7.0 through the conclusion of the test
at about 350 BV. Data from these column tests are included in Appendix A of this
report. The conclusions to be drawn from these column tests are as follows: 1) A
temporary pH shift to below 6.5 (the lowest allowed for drinking water) is likely unless
the resin is at least partially converted to the bicarbonate form. 2) 100% conversion to
bicarbonate is more than needed to prevent an excessive downward pH shift. Only
partial conversion is needed. 3) More water run through the resin during pre-treatment
correlates to a less severe downward pH shift. 4) The Purolite A300 resin seems to be
adequately clean once it has been cycled and fully rinsed. These column tests left some
important questions unanswered including what is the minimum required bicarbonate
conversion to prevent a pH shift to below 6.5 and how much of the pH shift is mitigated
by all the water that is passed through the resin as it is sluiced through the tanker, transfer
vessel and process vessel prior to being put on-line in lag service at the GWTP.
Standby process beds A2 and B2 were placed into lag service on September 14,
2005. The resin in these two beds was Purolite A300 that had been cycled and placed
60% in the bicarbonate form. A flow through test cell was set up on the effluent of both
Ace Services Site 2-17 044720.01.49LTRA Audil Report No. 8
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiti
beds to closely monitor the pH as the beds went into service. The pH dropped only
slightly to a low of 6.7 just at start-up and rose quickly and steadily to 7.0 in only 50 BV.
It was noted that this resin had actually been cycled twice prior to delivery to the GWTP.
Purolite had cycled the resin before delivery to USF. Due to the problems that residual
contaminants in the resin had caused recently, USF cycled the resin again prior to the
partial bicarbonate conversion. When this resin was placed in service at the GWTP no
foaming, odor or color throw was evident. This run in demonstrated that partial
bicarbonate conversion will limit the downward pH shift to acceptable levels. Data from
this bed run-in test is included in Appendix A,
One final set of resin tests were conducted at the GWTP. Theses tests were full
scale process tests aimed at determining the impact on the pH shift caused by the normal
sluicing of the resin and secondarily to help the determine the minimum percent
bicarbonate conversion needed with the DOW SAR resin to limit the pH shift to above
6.5. Beds A3 and B3 had been loaded with the first batches of Dow SAR under the new
supply contract with USF on September 22, 2005. Bed A3 was loaded with untreated
Dow SAR like the Dow resin in the small column test conducted September 12 through
16, 2005 described above. The difference this time was that since this resin was a full
batch loaded into the process vessel this resin had been sluiced into the transportation
tanker were is remained flooded for two or three days in transit to the GWTP. Once the
tanker arrived at the GWTP, the resin was sluiced out of the tanker into the GWTP
transfer vessel and then sluiced again from the transfer vessel into the process vessel.
Once in the process vessel the resin was backwashed with 9000 gallons, settled and
rinsed with another 9000 gallons then left in the process vessel for about 5 weeks from
September 22 until October 26, 2005 when both beds A3 and B3 were placed in lag
service. This handling is typical for all resin deliveries the GWTP. Bed B3 was loaded
with Dow SAR that had been converted to approximately 35% bicarbonate from, but was
otherwise handled in the same manner as the untreated resin in bed A3. Flow through
cells were set up on the effluent of both beds prior to placing them into lag service and
the pH was closely monitored during the run-in. The effluent pH from the untreated resin
in bed A3 drop to a low of pH 5.89 at 30 BV and then steadily recovered reaching pH 6.5
Ace Services Site 2-18 044720.01.49
LTRA Audit Report No. 8
ItfffIIIIIIIIIIIIII
at around 110 BV then full equilibrium (in=out) at 322 BV. Note that all the water
passed through this resin in the normal course of handling reduced the severity of the pH
offset from 4.8 to only 5.89. The partial bicarbonate form Dow resin in bed B3 hit a low
of Ph 6.59 in only 3 BV, rising steadily to a plateau around pH 6.90 after 58 BV. The
effluent pH held nearly steady from 58 to 166 BV then resumed rising to equilibrium (in
= out) at 322 BV. Data from this bed run-in test is included in Appendix A
The results of the testing done the week of October 25, 2005 indicate that a
complete solution to the resin issues at the GWTP would include using Dow SAR
converted to about 35% bicarbonate form. Pricing was negotiated with USF for the
bicarbonate conversion and the supply contract was modified accordingly. The cost for
the bicarbonate conversion is $5.87 per cubic foot of resin. This represents an increase of
about 5.6% over the base cost of the Dow SAR. The contract originally signed with USF
for supply of Dow SAR allowed for a 10% annual price escalation. The modification to
this contract to include the bicarbonate conversion limits the first annual escalation to
13% including the 5.6% cost of the bicarbonate conversion, thus USF is sharing some of
the cost with EPA. The contract modification was placed in force during the week of
October 31,2005. '
The first resin beds with Dow SAR resin (beds A3 and B3) will not cycle though
and out of lead service until some time late in the ninth audit period. It is expected that
the Dow SAR will have somewhat better chromium holding performance than the
Purolite A300 thereby offsetting some of the increase in resin costs. This will be
evaluated in the ninth audit report.
Ace Services Sue 2-19 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
3.0 Sampling and Record Keeping
As part of the audit, the in-plant records kept by the City operators were reviewed
for completeness and conformity to requirements. During the review, emphasis was
placed on water flow and chromium concentration data that are critical to evaluation of
treatment system performance. The daily records were well organized in notebooks kept
at the plant. The daily records were organized by month and date and were complete and
easy to access. The City operators have continued to enter the flow meter totalizer
readings and sample analysis results in Excel spreadsheets to facilitate trend tracking and
quick data retrieval. The sample record sheets have been expanded to include free
chlorine results now when the discharge to the city water system is active.
The operators have continued to fill out the new GAC system log sheet each day.
This new log sheet records critical flow and pressure data for the new GAC system.
Samples taken and analyzed by KDHE from the GAC system upstream of the
GWTP indicated the possibility of the presence of trivalent chromium in the raw
groundwater. This would be a significant problem since the anion resin used at the
GWTP cannot remove trivalent chromium. A careful review of the influent water sample
results from the GWTP show no indication of any trivalent chromium. In addition,
effluent samples from the GWTP sent for laboratory analysis indicate no detectable
chromium in the effluent of any species (total chrome analysis). Any measurable amount
of trivalent chromium in the GWTP influent would necessarily show up in total chrome
analysis of the GWTP effluent. As a precaution, the regular morning plant influent
sample will now be analyzed on-site for both total and hexavalent chromium. A total
value in excess of the hexavalent value would indicate the possibility of trivalent chrome
in the influent.
The City operating staff has done an excellent job with the sampling and record
keeping requirements during the sixth audit period. Only one significant irregularity was
noted in the audit and subsequent review of records. The hexavalent chromium
concentration data at the GWTP influent (sample locations SC-1 and SC-2) are higher in
the off-site laboratory analysis than those recorded from in-plant analysis. If this trend
Ace Services Site 3-1 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
continues it may be necessary to replace the GWTP lab spectrophotometer.
Recommendations regarding plant sampling are as follows:
1. Addition of total chrome analysis for plant influent. As described above, the
daily GWTP influent sample will be analyzed for both total and hexavalent
chromium as a precaution to look for evidence of trivalent chromium in the
raw water. The. plant sample record form was revised to record total
chromium results for the sample taken at location SC-1.
2. Sample transfer methods for on-site analysis. BVSPC had recommended
that the plant operators use pre-calibrated disposable pipettes or pipettors to
transfer the precise correct volume of sample from the large sample collection
jars to the small vials used for sample analysis in the spectrophotometers.
During the seventh audit period, the plant operators instituted this change,
choosing to use a fixed volume disposable pipette. Shortly after making the
change in procedure, the supplier of the bulb style pipette discontinued that
product. On BVSPC recommendation, the operators began using an
adjustable volume plunger style pipettor with a disposable tip. The operators
report that this has been a marked improvement and making sample transfer
simpler while reducing the possibility of cross sample contamination.
i
There have been no significant changes regarding plant sampling and record
keeping during the eighth audit period with the exception of adding once daily total
chromium analysis at sample location SC-1.
Ace Services Site 3-2 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
4.0 Evaluation of System Performance
The new GAC system constructed by KDHE was started on August 24, 2004
(during the fourth audit period). Data were closely monitored during the eighth audit
period to determine if there were any significant impacts on the GWTS as a result of the
GAC system being on line. The only day-to-day impacts noted were the occasional
loading of carbon fines on the bag filters and the additional head pressure required of the
extraction pumps to push through the GAC beds.
The ability to capture and control the chromium plume in the ground water is
periodically assessed via sampling and ground water elevation measurement. These data
are analyzed and the findings summarized in semi-annual Cleanup Status Reports. The
most recent report (Cleanup Status Report Number 4, dated July 20, 2005) indicates that
the extraction wells are providing good plume containment and capture.
Selected flow and sampling data from July 21, 2005, through October 12, 2005,
are presented in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 also shows the amount of hexavalent chromium
removed by the treatment system. As shown in Table 4-1, the concentration of
hexavalent chromium in the raw water entering the treatment system during the eighth
audit period began at about 220 ug/1 in late July and dropped slightly to about 185 ug/l.by
early October.
The data show that the system treated 101.5 million gallons from July 21, 2005,
through October 12, 2005: 51.56 million gallons in Train A and 49.96 million gallons in
Train B. A total of 76.14 kilograms (kg) (167.86 pounds) of chromium were removed
during this period. Two beds of ion exchange resin (Beds A3 and B3) were exhausted
during this period as shown in Table 4-1. The resin performance for each of the
exhausted beds is shown below:
Bed A3: 29.44 million gallons: 50.45 Ibs chromium: 41.61 gr/cf*
Bed B3: 29.11 million gallons: 49.89 Ibs chromium: 41.14 gr/cP
* gr/cf = grams of chromium per cubic foot of resin
Ace Services Site 4-1 044720.01.49LIRA Audil Report No. 8
IThe relative performance data from the previous periods are shown below along
• with the data for Beds A3 and B3 from this audit period. Data from the early periods are
shown as an average per 550 cubic foot bed of resin.
Performance test: 20.5 million gal: 121.4 gr/cf*
ft First audit period: 27.0 million gal: 93.6 gr/cf*
Second audit period: 32.5 million gal: 51.2 gr/cf*
• Third Audit Period: 32.3 million gal: 41.9 gr/cf*
Fourth Audit period:
• Bed A3: 31.1 million gal: 71.35 gr/cf*
Bed B2 31.1 million gal: 34.28 gr/cf*
• BedB3 33.9 million gal 29.53 gr/cf*
Fifth Audit period:
I BedAl 25.72 million gal 75.1 gr/cf *
BedBl 25.35 million gaJ 88.18 gr/cf*
1 BedA2 40.37 million gal 90.81 gr/cf*
BedB2 30.71 million gal 73.06 gr/cf*
I Sixth Audit Period: 1
Bed A3 32.04 million gal: 57.67 gr/cf*
| BedB3 35.08 million gal: 63.87 gr/cf*
Seventh Audit Period:
| BedAl 27.74 million gal 36.14 gr/cf*
Bed B1 26.75 million gal 34.86 gr/cf *
| BedA2 30.13 million gal 42.62 gr/cf*
Bed B2 30.11 million gal 42.54 gr/cf *
J Eighth Audit Period:
Bed A3 29.44 million gal 41.61 gr/cf*
I BedB3 29.11 million gal 41.14 gr/cf*
I* gr/cf = grams of chromium per cubic foot of resin
I
Ace Services Site 4-2 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
fffifIIIIIIIIIIIII
The chromium holding capacity of the resin is expected to diminish with
diminishing influent hexavalent chromium concentrations due to the lower equilibrium.
This is clearly seen in the data above as well as in Figure 4-1. More gallons of water are
treated with the same 550 cubic feet of resin but at diminishing resin holding capacity.
During the entire period of time covered by the second and third audits, the wells
with the highest chromium concentrations were shut down awaiting design and
completion of the GAC system. During that time, chromium concentrations entering the
GWTP were averaging only around 120 to 150 ug/L. Once the GAC system was brought
on line in late August 2004 and all the extraction wells were restarted, the influent
chromium concentrations jumped up to as high a 700 ug/L and have been dropping
steadily since but the chromium concentration is still holding above the low levels seen in
the second and third audit periods. The affects of this can be seen in the higher grams per
cubic foot holding capacity of the resin late in the fourth audit period (Bed A3) and
throughout the fifth audit period. Chromium concentration in the influent ground water
continued to drop during the eighth audit period to around 185 ug/L by the end of the
period which is only a little higher than the very low levels seen during the second and
third audit periods and very similar to the concentration during the sixth and seventh
audit periods. Note that the total gallons treated per bed during the sixth audit period are
very similar to the results during the second and third audit periods. Total gallons treated
during the seventh and eighth audit periods are substantially lower than during the
second, third and sixth periods even though the influent chromium concentrations were
similar. There is no obvious reason for this poor performance. As noted in section 2.3
above, there have been significant issues regarding the quality and condition of the resin
supplied to the GWTP during the seventh and eighth audit periods. The last batches of
Purolite A300 are in lead service (beds A2 and B2) as of the time of writing this report.
The first batches of Dow SAR (beds A3 and B3) will cycle through lead service by the
end of the ninth audit period. The treatment performance of the new resin will be closely
monitored. It is anticipated that the Dow SAR resin will show improved performance.
As the hexavalent chromium concentration drops, a point is eventually reached
where the gallons treated by a given amount of resin will no longer increase. This is due
Ace Services Silt 4-3 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
to the presence of other anions in the influent water that take up resin exchange capacity.
The data presented above suggest that a 550 cubic foot volume of resin cannot treat more
than 31 to 34 million gallons of Colby ground water regardless of hexavalent chromium
concentration. Bed A2 in the fifth audit period is an obvious exception, treating over 40
million gallons at a fairly high chromium loading rate. A possible explanation is that the
bed was loaded with more than the usual 550 cubic feet of resin. Each bed has a total
volume of 1100 cubic feet and is intended to run only half full of resin to allow plenty of
head space for air bump and backwash operations. If 650 to 700 cubic feet of resin were
loaded into the bed there would be no indication of the extra resin except a slightly higher
pressure drop through the bed. A review of the pressure drop data during the time that
Bed A2 was in lead position does in fact show a pressure drop that is consistently 20% to
30% greater than the other bed in the same train. Based on the data it is very likely that
Bed A2 contained 650 to 700 cubic feet of resin during its run in the fifth audit period.
This data point is not included in Figure 4-1 since it is not representative.
Figure 4-1 is a plot of gallons of water treated by an ion exchange bed vs. the
average chromium concentration of the water treated by the bed before significant
chromium breakthrough. This figure very clearly depicts the trends and limits noted
above. As seen in Figure 4-1, the gallons of water treated increases as the chromium
loading decreases in almost a linear relationship. However, once the average chromium
concentration in the GWTP influent water drops below about 300 ug/L, no more increase
in the gallons treated per bed is seen. Every bed with an average chromium influent
concentration below 350 ug/L treated between 31 and 35 million gallons of water (except
during the seventh and eighth audit periods while resin quality issues were encountered)
with no correlation to chromium concentration. This can be used as planning tool for
scheduling bed change-outs. Unless the influent chromium concentrations again rise
above 350 ug/1, each bed can be anticipated to treat 33 +/- 2 million gallons of water.
The change to Dow SAR resin may or may not have an impact on this value.
Ion exchange is often used as a polishing process in water treatment because it is
very cost efficient compared to other treatment technologies at low contaminant
concentrations. The relatively low concentration of hexavalent chromium seen in the
composite influent groundwater is an excellent application for ion exchange. The total
Ace Services Site 4-4 044720.01.49LIRA Audit Report No. 8
fIII
IIII
resin cost including transportation and disposal was 0.152 cents per gallon of water
treated for the eighth audit period. This is essentially the same as the .0155 cents per
gallon from the seventh audit period. This cost is up considerably from 0.130 cents per
gallon during the sixth audit period when the average chromium loading was essentially
the same and is further evidence of poor resin performance during the seventh and eighth
audit periods. This is still a significant reduction from 0.210 cents per gallon from the
performance test and 0.166 cents per gallon from the first audit period when average
chromium concentrations were higher. This diminishing cost as the chromium loading
drops demonstrates the efficiency of the ion exchange process in this application. There
is not sufficient data at this time to determine the total cost per gallon to treat the
extracted ground water including labor and plant utilities.
Ace Services Site 4-5 044720.01.49LTRA Audit Report No. 8
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Table 4-1Selected Flow and Chromium Concentration Data
Ace Services Site
. Date
20-Jul-052122232425262728293031
Hexavalent ChromiumAt sample location SC-1Hach unit
(ug/L)
Totals for Month
ContinentalLabs (ug/L)
218218218218218218218223223223223223
TRAIN AGallonsTreatedx 1000
597558695592651564604655586676604635
7417
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.4930.4610.5740.4890.5370.4660.4990.5530.4950.5710.5100.5366.183
TRAIN BGallonsTreatedx l O O O
606538670570627543618631564651582612
7212
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.5000.4440.5530.4710.5180.4480.5100.5330.4760.5500.4910.5176.012
RemarksBeds A3 and B3 are lead
Ace Services SiteLIRA Audit Repon #8 4-6 044720.01.49
I
IIfIffIIIIIIIIIIIII
Table 4-1Selected Flow and Chromium Concentration Data
Ace Services Site
Date
1-Aug-052345678910 '111213141516171819202122232425262728293031
Hexavalent ChromiumAt sample location SC-1Hach unit
(ug/L)
Totals for Month
ContinentalLabs (ug/L)
223223209209209209209209209215215215215215215215206206206206206206206210210210210210210210202
TRAIN AGallonsTreatedx l O O O
604574684616659614624602536606561556569572516615578549562559566558567694637626612654632598672
18572
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.5100.4850.5410.4880.5220.4860.4940.4760.4240.4930.4570.4530.4630.4660.4200.5010.4510.4280.4380.4360.4420.4350.4420.5520.5070.4980.4870.5200.5030.4760.514
14.807
TRAIN BGallonsTreatedx 1000
603572683615627613622601536604562554568572508612578549560558565557
.- 56669263662361165463598672
18502
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.5090.4830.5410.4870.4960.4850.4920.4760.4240.4920.4580.4510.4620.4660.4140.4980.4510.4280.4370.4350.440.4350.4420.5500.5060.4950.4860.520.500.470.51
14.75
Remarks
Ace Services SiteLIRA Audi t Report #8 4-7 044720.01.49
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Table 4-1Selected Flow and Chromium Concentration Data
Ace Services Site
Date
1-Sept-0523456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930
Hexavalent ChromiumAt sample location SC-1Hach unit
(ug/L)
Totals for Month
ContinentalLabs (ug/L)
145145145145145145145174174174174174174194194194194194194194194201201201201201201201182182182
TRAIN AGallonsTreatedx 1000
478547482497487489471580651594644635586642621667639,618634649574636687634634627586698615657
17959
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.2620.3000.2650.2730.2670.2690.2590.3820.4290.3910.4240.4180.3860.4720.4560.4900.4690.4540.4660.4770.4220.4840.5230.4830.4830.4770.4460.5310.4240.453
12.336
TRAIN BGallonsTreatedx 1000
476546480449487488470340382348380406585643619668639618633648570639686632634626585697614655
16643
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.2610.3000.2640.2470.2670.2680.2580.2240.2520.2290.2500.2680.3850.4720.4550.4910.4690.4540.4650.4760.4190.4860.5220.4810.4830.4770.4450.530.4230.45
11.474
Remarks
Switch to A1, B1 lead
Ace Services SiteLIRA Audi t Report #8 4-8 044720.01.49
I
f
f
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
Table 4-1Selected Flow and Chromium Concentration Data
Ace Services Site
Date.
1-Oct-0523456789101112
Hexavalent ChromiumAt sample location SC-1Hach unit
(ug/L)
Totals for Month
ContinentalLabs (ug/L)
182182182182182185185185185185185185
TRAIN AGallonsTreatedx 1000
621636634648651553692626645630647624
7607
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.4280.4380.4370.4470.4490.3870.4850.4390.4520.4410.4530.4375.293
TRAIN BGallonsTreatedx 1000
620635633649653554690625]644628645623
7599
ChromiumRemoved
(kg)0.4270.4380.4360.4470.4500.3880.4830.4380.4510.4400.4520.4365.288
Remarks
Beds A 1, 81 lead
Ace Services SiteLIRA Audi t Report #8 4-9 044720.OI.49
40
c 30
Figure 4-1Gallons treated vs chromium concentration
•5. 20 -(/>
^ 1
0
-' V.. i ' ' • ' ' * • . ' • " A -•".
'*''~'
• - • - • • , .•, •/''"%-j'f •: >'•/ ' ' •
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Ghromium (ug/L)
Page 4-10
0
t
f
f
f
f
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.0 Action Summary
The following is a list of recommended actions or changes to improve system
operation or record keeping procedures based on observations made during the eighth
audit. This is a summary list. This list also includes any needed equipment repairs or
adjustments identified during this audit. Further details can be found in the body of this
audit report. It is noted that action items 1, 2, and 4 are carried over from the seventh
audit report.
1. Install filters in the well house ventilation inlets as described in Section 2.1,
item 4.
2. Install the new conductivity probes on both trains and recalibrate the meters.
3. Rescale the PLC for the new 0 to 200 foot range to match the new level probe
in well EX-4i
4. Install the remaining bolt isolation sleeves included in the piping
modifications described in Section 2.2, Item 3.
5. Re-route the chlorine booster loop to locate the ejector inside the GWTP and
install a surge arrester on the loop to cushion this piping from water hammer.
Ace Services Site 5-1 044720.01.49LIRA Audil Repon No. 8
•I•111 APPENDIX A
V Resin pH Run-in Charts
1I
IIIIIII
Column tests Sept 12-16, 2005Purolite A300 and Dow SAR
•Purolite, cycled•Purolite, rinsedPurolite 100% bicarbDow SAR, untreated
Bed Volumes
Process Bed A2 Purolite A300 cycled and placed 60% bicarbonate: Sept 14, 2005
-Series'!
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 , 1 0 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 . 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 8 2 9 3 2 3 6 3 . 4 1 4 4 4 7 5 0 6 6
Bed Volumes
Beds A3 and B3: DOW SAR October 26, 2005
7.10
6.90
6.70 is—rJF
6.50
6.30
6.10
5.90 -
5.70
5.50
50 100 150 200
Bed Volumes
Untreated Dow SAR35% bicab Dow SAR
250 300 350
Top Related