© 2012 bimSCORE
bimSCORE -- Finding your Formula for
Successful Commissioning with BIM
AABC Commissioning Group (ACG)
April 27th 2012
Dr. Calvin Kam
Tony Rinella
1
© 2012 bimSCORE 2
• Dr. Calvin Kam, PhD, AIA, PE, LEED AP
• Tony Rinella, Assoc. AIA
bimSCORE -- Finding your Formula for
Successful Commissioning with BIM
© 2012 bimSCORE
The Challenges We Face
3
© 2012 bimSCORE
Global Construction Market Forecasts
*1 --- M. Betts et al., "2020, A Global Forecast for the Construction Industry Over the Next Decade to 2020", Global Construction Perspectives and Oxford Economics, London, UK, Mar. 2011
*2 --- Emplica “”Construction Outlook 2020 Jun. 2010
Average 10% GDP to Construction in many countries
67% Growth in Global Construction by 2020*1
70% Growth in Global Construction by 2020*2
4
© 2012 bimSCORE
USA: Construction Productivity
5
© 2012 bimSCORE
Image Source: Alan Edgar
Problem
When used properly, Building Information Modeling (BIM)
technology provides the means to improve:
• Building Performance
• Sustainability
• Construction Productivity
•Built Environment Quality
• Operational Efficiency
6
© 2012 bimSCORE
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Hour of the day (Cases: 1. Base case & 2. Case 2, Better Solar Shielding)
Total
Infiltration
Conduction (no windows)
People
Lighting
Equipment
Window (cond. + rad.)
Thermal loadsSpace: 089 NC1st_026 Day Care
3D Coordination BIM—Spatial
4D Phasing BIM—Energy 3D Laser Scanning
BIM = Building Information Modeling
© 2012 bimSCORE
Labor-Intensive vs. Output-Driven
Laborious & Manual
Approach
Efficient & Automated
Approach
8
Source: Tekla, Tokyo Sky Tree Source: Associated Press
© 2012 bimSCORE
Source: Tekla, Tokyo Sky Tree Source: http://wn.com/workers_stadium
Labor-Intensive vs. Output-Driven
Laborious & Manual
Approach
Efficient & Automated
Approach
9
© 2012 bimSCORE
Construction vs. Manufacturing
• Labor Productivity
comparisons can be
deceiving
• One must also consider
Employment Growth
• The Focus should be on
Value Added Growth
10
PER CENT PER
ANUNM
MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION
Source: Singapore’s Productivity Performance of Economics Division Ministry of Trade and Industry
© 2012 bimSCORE
BIM Provides Solutions
11
© 2012 bimSCORE
Model-based Estimation of Material & Labor
12
© 2012 bimSCORE
Model-based Schedule & Resource Optimization
13
© 2012 bimSCORE
Ongoing Visualization of Key Performance Indicators
14
Pre-Design Model
© 2012 bimSCORE
Cost Breakdown Tied to BIM
15
© 2012 bimSCORE
Resolve Errors & Omissions Beyond Clashes
16
© 2012 bimSCORE
Dimensional Control on Site Tied to BIM
17
SOURCE: Trimble SOURCE: leica-geosystems.com
© 2012 bimSCORE
BIM Brings Higher Quality & More Profit
• Residential High-rise
Tower
• Pre-Land Acquisition
Stage on…
• Model integrated cost,
schedule, resource
analysis
18
© 2012 bimSCORE
Schedule Cost
Design Fabrication
Explicit model-based estimation Location based scheduling & 4D
Parametric Design
Coordinated BIM Guides Design to Fabrication
Off-site fabrication
© 2012 bimSCORE
Why a Scorecard?
20
© 2012 bimSCORE
BIM can be a vehicle to take
your project forward quickly
and efficiently.
Most manage BIM using
past performance reports ---
like driving forward looking
only in the rear view mirror.
Automobile users depend
on a roadmap, GPS, and
speedometer. What help is
available for BIM users?
21
© 2012 bimSCORE
BIM is the vehicle that can
take your project forward
quickly and efficiently.
bimSCORE provides the
roadmap, clearly marking
goals and paths to reach
them.
22
Identify and Target Goals
in the Context of
Global Project Knowledge
© 2012 bimSCORE
BIM is the vehicle that can
take your project forward
quickly and efficiently.
bimSCORE provides the
GPS, clearly showing the
relationship between where
you are and your goal while
evaluating suggested paths
alternatives to reach your
goal.
23
Chart Best Paths
Navigate Around Roadblocks
© 2012 bimSCORE
BIM is the vehicle that can
take your project forward
quickly and efficiently.
bimSCORE provides a
speedometer, gauging your
rate of progress toward your
goals.
24
Objectively Measure Progress
Benchmark to State-of-Practice
© 2012 bimSCORE
Maximizing BIM value is a life-cycle process
goals
best practices
evaluation, benchmark, advice and
continuous improvements
ROI
satisfaction
Maintaining a healthy body is a life-long mission
Continuous monitoring Surgery & Treatment Annual Check-up Health Planning
25
© 2012 bimSCORE
VDC Scorecard Framework
26
© 2012 bimSCORE 27
Research
• Academic Exploration &
Validation
• Sets Standards for
Evaluations
• Research, Collaboration
with CIFE members
• Dozens of Cases per Year
Development
• Professional Advice &
Implementation
• Worldwide Score &
Solution Database
• Industry Partnerships,
Delivery Methods
• Hundreds/Thousands
of Cases per Year
Stanford CIFE
Collaborative
Feedback Loop
© 2012 bimSCORE
Technology Provide the right tools
Image source: iPoint 3D
Four Primary Evaluation Areas
Planning Establish objectives and protocols
Adoption Find the right people & process
Image source:
actionmarketingcopy.com/tag/marketing-objectives/
Image source: www.businessihub.com/guide-for-
choosing-your-business-objectives/
Image source: www.us.spinnaker-nt.com;
betterhiringtoday.com/5-signs-your-hiring-process-needs-help/
Performance Track impact, progress
28
© 2012 bimSCORE
Objective Framework | Summary and Detailed Views
vdcscorecard.stanford.edu
1 Overall Score 4 Areas 10 Dimensions 50+ Measures
29
© 2012 bimSCORE
Confidence Level
30
• Reflects completeness and diversity of data used to
derive the score
vdcscorecard.stanford.edu
© 2012 bimSCORE
bimSCORE application of
VDC Scorecard concepts
31
© 2012 bimSCORE 32
Research
• Academic Exploration &
Validation
• Sets Standards for
Evaluations
• Research, Collaboration
with CIFE members
• Dozens of Cases per Year
Development
• Professional Advice &
Implementation
• Worldwide Score &
Solution Database
• Industry Partnerships,
Delivery Methods
• Hundreds/Thousands
of Cases per Year
Stanford CIFE
Collaborative
Feedback Loop
© 2012 bimSCORE
Benchmark and Mange Success
Conventional Practice Typical Practice Advanced Practice Best
Practice Innovative
Practice
• Maximize return on BIM investments through SWOT analysis
• Develop the formula for success
• Validate planning and processes to achieve industry best practices
• Verify execution is in alignment with plan and targets.
33
© 2012 bimSCORE
Benchmark to World-wide Standards
Compare with selected
advanced, relevant projects
in our world-wide database.
See clear head-to-head
comparisons using a
standardized mechanism
Set realistic improvement
targets based on real-world
accomplishments
34
© 2012 bimSCORE 35
Technology Provide the right tools
Image source: iPoint 3D
Four Primary Evaluation Areas
Planning Establish objectives and protocols
Adoption Find the right people & process
Image source:
actionmarketingcopy.com/tag/marketing-objectives/
Image source: www.businessihub.com/guide-for-
choosing-your-business-objectives/
Image source: www.us.spinnaker-nt.com;
betterhiringtoday.com/5-signs-your-hiring-process-needs-help/
Performance Track impact, progress
© 2012 bimSCORE
Return of Investment (ROI) Metrics
Metric Unit of
measurement Value
Latency of Critical Issues Time to reach
resolution Avoid snowball effect
Commitment Overrun Days past due date Address reasons for delays
early on
Impact of Issues by Trade,
by Schedule, by Cost % of issues that
incurred impact
Fine tuning future BIM
efforts by trade accordingly
Detailed Cost
Conformance
bid-to-actual cost
variance at all
phases of estimating
Interpret variances &
perfect estimation
methodologies
Just-In-Time Delivery % of material
delivered within
24 hours of use
Streamline procurement
and cash flow
36
© 2012 bimSCORE 37
Planning Communications • Creative-ED&E-PM-FM Cost Performance • # RFIs vs. $ Change Directives
Ratio Schedule Performance • Schedule Conformance (% of
milestones that hit scheduled) Facility Performance • Energy use Safety • Lost hour / job Project Quality • Planning Effectiveness ($ field
rework due to coordination errors)
• # Punchlist Items Other Management Objective • IPD-BIM across all domestic by
2013 • IPD-BIM globally by 2014
Adoption Process • Design Duration • # Days (Ave) Response
Latency of RFIs Organization • # Users vs. Week # of
Project • Team Collaboration
(subjective) • Design Productivity (design
duration/$ scope of work) • Commitment Reliability (#
BIM clashes resolved on time/planned to be resolved)
Technology Maturity • # Clashes Found/$ Scope
of Work • # Use during Decision-
Making Meetings • Value of BIM-Use
(subjective) Coverage • Conformance to BEP+E202
Integration • Tightness between BIM
and 2D • Reliability of modeling
exchanges
Performance Actual vs. Target | Return on Investment | Performance over Time
© 2012 bimSCORE
Project Evaluation
38
© 2012 bimSCORE
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
PROJECT
PORTFOLIO
bimSCORE Results: 2011-12 Express Overview >> Adoption Note: After reading each of the 4 dimensional results, please click on the "Advice" button on the blue wheel in the upper left of the bimSCORE Dashboard to see different project delivery Scenarios and Advice. bimSCORE Evaluators audited weekly project meetings and were provided with model exchange samples and project information correspondence among architects, engineers, specialty consultants, contractors and the owners. bimSCORE Evaluators questioned the relevance and frequency of the BIM
Planning
Adoption
Technology
Performance
Organization
Process
30%
17%
Sutter Health Castro Valley scores 92% in bimSCORE adoption… Only 16% of industry project tracks quantitative objectives…
Project : Northern CA Mixed Use
Express
Confidence Level 10%
Base Case Scenario 1 Scenario 2
Learn Best Practices
In the context of your
project
Pinpoint greatest
opportunity areas for
enhancement
Gauge BIM maturity
in context of
comparable projects
worldwide or local
Easily Understood
Reporting & Decision
Support Dashboard
Interactively explore
alternative scenarios
for improvement of
project execution
© 2012 bimSCORE
40
Project : Northern CA Mixed Use
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Confidence Level 10%
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Planning
Adoption
Technology
Performance
PROJECT
PORTFOLIO
Product Measure
Performance
People Measure
Adoption
Process Measure
Planning
…and support with technology
© 2012 bimSCORE
41
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Project : Northern CA Mixed Use
Planning
Adoption
Technology
Performance
PROJECT
PORTFOLIO
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Confidence Level 10%
Objectives Standards
Preparation
Planning Metrics
Communications
• Creative-ED&E-PM-FM
Cost Performance
• # RFIs vs. $ Change Directives
Ratio
• Predictability
Schedule Performance
• Schedule Conformance (% of
milestones that hit scheduled)
Facility Performance
• Energy use
Safety
• Lost hour / job
Project Quality
• Collective Quality
• Planning Effectiveness ($ field
rework due to coordination
errors)
• # Punchlist Items
Other Management Objective
• IPD-BIM across all domestic by
2013
• IPD-BIM globally by 2014
• Innovation
47%
48%
60%
© 2012 bimSCORE
42
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Project : Northern CA Mixed Use
Planning
Adoption
Technology
Performance
PROJECT
PORTFOLIO ✚
Δ
Organization
Process
70%
30%
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Confidence Level 10%
© 2012 bimSCORE
43
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Project : Northern CA Mixed Use
Planning
Adoption
Technology
Performance
PROJECT
PORTFOLIO ✚
Δ
Organization
Process
100%
30%
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Confidence Level 10%
Adoption Metrics
Process
• Design Duration
• # Days (Ave) Response
Latency of RFIs
• Design Completion
Organization
• # Users vs. Week # of
Project
• Team Collaboration
(subjective)
• Design Productivity
(design duration/$ scope
of work)
• Commitment Reliability
(# BIM clashes resolved
on time/planned to be
resolved)
• Shared Risks &
Incentives
• Collaboration
© 2012 bimSCORE
44
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Project : Northern CA Mixed Use
Planning
Adoption
Technology
Performance
PROJECT
PORTFOLIO ✚
Δ
Maturity Coverage
Integration
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Confidence Level 10%
Technology Metrics
Maturity
• # Clashes Found/$ Scope of
Work
• # Use during Decision-
Making Meetings
• Value of BIM-Use
(subjective)
• Prefabrication
Coverage
• Conformance to BEP+E202
Integration
• Tightness between BIM and
2D
• Reliability of modeling
exchanges
• Impeccable Collaboration
© 2012 bimSCORE
45
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Project : Northern CA Mixed Use
Planning
Adoption
Technology
Performance
PROJECT
PORTFOLIO ✚
Δ
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Confidence Level 10%
Quantitative
Qualitative
Performance Metrics
Quantitative
• Planning: Actual vs. Target
• Adoption: Actual vs. Target
• Technology: Actual vs. Target
• Preventive Metrics vs.
Reactive Metrics
• Return of Investment
Qualitative
• Satisfaction by
Stakeholders (Happy?)
• Satisfaction by Individuals
(Happy?)
• Resistance Factors
• Meeting Effectiveness
59%
48%
© 2012 bimSCORE
Advice
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Concept
Design
Schematic
Design
Design
Development
Construction
Documents Construction
Operation
&
Management
A Parallel analysis of multiple site development options to maximize profits
B Model-based cost estimation from inception to inform design and avoid value engineering
C Automatically detect and resolve errors and omissions beyond clashes
D Inform façade design with early cost / performance impact analysis
E Coordinate setting out process with clash-free BIM
A
B, C, D
E
Actual
Suggested Target
46
© 2012 bimSCORE
Optimizing Results with BIM
47
© 2012 bimSCORE
BIM Brings Higher Quality & More Profit
• Residential High-rise
Tower
• Pre-Land Acquisition
Stage
• Model integrated cost,
schedule, resource
analysis
Source : Optima
48
© 2012 bimSCORE
L16-51 Residential
Core
987sf 2BR
1517sf 2BR
1517sf 2BR
626sf Studio
626sf Studio
1232sf 2BR
1232sf 2BR
784sf 1BR
784sf 1BR
Pre-Design Costing
• Feasibility Study
based on Previous
Project Designs
• High Level
Program Blocking
& Stacking
Source : Optima
49
© 2012 bimSCORE
L16-51 Residential Integrate Historic Data with Model
• Predict Building
Quantity at Pre-
Design Phase
• Methodical Cost
Estimation with
Low Detail Level
Model
Source : Optima
50
© 2012 bimSCORE
L16-51 Residential Integrate Historic Data with Model
• Ensured All Items
were Included
• Efficient QC on
Consultant’s Cost
Estimates
Source : Optima
51
© 2012 bimSCORE
Source : Optima
Cost + Schedule + Resource
52
© 2012 bimSCORE
Source : Optima
Early Informed Decisions
One Elevator Zone:
Occupancy starts week 81
Two Elevator Zones:
Occupancy starts week 65
Three Elevator Zones:
Occupancy starts week 56
Week 56
Week 65
Week 81
53
© 2012 bimSCORE
Exemplary Case
• New HealthCare
Facility
• Construction Stage
• Integrated BIM and
On-site Construction
Workflow
Source : DPR
54
© 2012 bimSCORE
BIM Enabled Field Setting Out
• Establish On-Site
Layout Coordinates
with BIM
• Document Field
Activities & Compare
with Design in BIM for
QC/RFI Purposes
Source : DPR
55
© 2012 bimSCORE
Site Verification of BIM Design Intent
SOURCE: DPR
56
© 2012 bimSCORE
Site Verification of BIM Design Intent
SOURCE: DPR
57
© 2012 bimSCORE
Portfolio Management
58
© 2012 bimSCORE
59
Portfolio
Welcome To Your Portfolio
Project Country Region Type Project
Progress
Overall
Score
Confidence
Level
Strength Weakness
Area
M Central
Mall
Singapor
e Marina Retail
10%
Construction 34% 10% Planning Adoption
BCC Bldg Singapor
e Marina Office
60% CD
Phase 41% 10% Planning Technology
Parc Lane Singapor
e Novena Residential
90% CD
Phase 45% 10% Planning Technology
Enter Project Name Search Sort Filter
© 2012 bimSCORE
60
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
Client Name Client Name
Planning
Adoption
Technology
Performance
PROJECT
PORTFOLIO Region Type Size Individual/C
ompany
Confidence Overall Strength Weakness
Filter
Compare
Conventional
Practice
Typical
Practice
Advanced
Practice
Best
Practice
Innovative
Practice
© 2012 bimSCORE
express
in depth
Workshops
0 3 6 9 12
Workshop Workshop
Timeline (months)
C
D
A
B
Workshop
6 Express assessments
Workshop
C
D
A
B
A C
D B 6 express assessments 4 express assessments
Selected 4 In depth assessments
• Evaluate a Project Over Time
• Benchmark a Portfolio of Projects
• Objective External Review of Firm-wide Processes
• Prequalify Vendors / Consultants
61
© 2012 bimSCORE
Targeting Targeting
self-reported metrics
bimSCORE metrics
Project B
ENTERPRISE – Targeting – RFP Advice – Continuous Improvement
RFP Requirements RFP Requirements
Continuous Improvement Evaluations
Legend Express Evaluation 3rd party administered metrics self-administered metrics action deliverables
Project A
Project C
workshops
Custom Web Portal Decision Support
Workshops
Enterprise Advisory
62
© 2012 bimSCORE 63
• Dr. Calvin Kam, PhD, AIA, PE, LEED AP
• Tony Rinella, Assoc. AIA
bimSCORE -- Finding your Formula for
Successful Commissioning with BIM
Top Related