Download - Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

Transcript
Page 1: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions

Alessandro Turrini and Stefan Zeugner

European Commission

International Financial Integration in a Changing Policy Context – the End of an Era?, Brussels, 2 March 2018

The views set out in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission.

Page 2: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

2

Context

• Since 2008, current account imbalances in many EU and emerging countries have adjusted

• But stock imbalances remain large: in particular NIIPs, that result from past deficits and surpluses

• Issue for macroeconomic surveillance (including EU Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure)

• Have NIIPs adjusted enough? How far to go further?

Page 3: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

3

Diverging NIIPs. Too much? On what respect?

Page 4: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

4

Aim of the paper

• Assessing NIIPs requires adequate benchmark

• Few existing analyses (e.g., Berti et al., 2010; Catão and Milesi Ferretti, 2014; Zorell, 2017) estimate common prudential thresholds across cross-country panels

• However:

Tolerance to external liabilities country-specific

How to judge large positive NIIPs?

Page 5: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

5

NIIP benchmarks: norm vs. prudential threshold

Two complementary approaches:

NIIP norm – two-sided:

• NIIP in line with economic fundamentals.

Prudential NIIP threshold – one-sided:

• NIIP threshold associated with increased external sustainability crisis.

Page 6: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

6

Estimating NIIP norms

• Directly regressing NIIP levels

Risk of spurious relation: NIIP (near)integrated in available samples.

• Alternative route:

Regress current accounts on main drivers

Predict current account norms on the basis of fundamental drivers (non-temporary, policy variables set at "normal value")

Cumulate current account norms over time

Page 7: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

7

Current account model

• Similar to Phillips et al. (2013)

Annual frequency

Including large set of fundamental and non-fundamental controls (25)

Variables expressed as differences from world average where appropriate

Advanced and emerging country sample (65) over 1987-2016 period

• Policy at "normal" level=world average

• NIIP not a fundamental

Page 8: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

8

Current account norms vs. DNIIP norms

Δ𝑁𝐼𝐼𝑃𝑡 = 𝑁𝐼𝐼𝑃𝑡 −11+𝑔𝑡𝑁𝐼𝐼𝑃𝑡−1 = 𝐶𝐴𝑡 + 𝐾𝐴𝑡 + 𝑉𝐸𝑡 +𝑁𝐸𝑂𝑡

Are current account norms a good approximation for Δ𝑁𝐼𝐼𝑃𝑡 norms?

• CA regressions yield broadly same coefficients as regressions on Δ𝑁𝐼𝐼𝑃𝑡 , but more precisely estimated

• One exception: "financial center" dummy (higher CAs and offsetting valuation effects)

• → Financial center dummy included in CA regression

but not included among the fundamentals

Page 9: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

9

Cumulating current account norms

𝑁𝐼𝐼𝑃𝑡 = 𝑁𝐼𝐼𝑃0𝑌0𝑌𝑡+ 𝐶𝐴𝑖

𝑡

𝑖=1

𝑌𝑖𝑌𝑡

• Choice of 𝑁𝐼𝐼𝑃0 : year where NIIP has lowest absolute value in 1993-1996 period

Earliest year for which CA norms are available for all countries is 1997

Comparability: avoid large differences in incidence of initial value across countries

NIIPs were low in absolute value at mid-1990s

• Incidence of initial NIIP is limited

Page 10: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

10

NIIP norms for 2016, based on differing starting values

Page 11: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

11

NIIP prudential threshold: Approach

Signalling approach (Kaminsky et al., 1998)

Min [Prob(missed crises) + Prob(false alarm)]

External crisis definition According to definition in Catão & Milesi-Ferretti: default or IMF assistance). 64 countries, 1980-2015

Computation of threshold: global max guaranteed

Assessment

- Signal power

- Robustness to sample perturbations

- Robustness to choice of target function (equalisation of error probability, AUROC)

Page 12: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

12

NIIP prudential threshold: Findings

Findings

• Common -25% NIIP threshold

• NIIP has stronger signal power than other external stock variables, equaled only by "Net Marketable External Debt" (≈NIIP net of equity)

• NIIP/relative GDP per capita permits to

Obtain a threshold with higher signal power than pure NIIP

Obtain country-specific thresholds (about -50% on average)

• Interpretation: GDP per capita captures structural and institutional aspects related to external debt tolerance

Page 13: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

13

Estimating prudential thresholds: Results

Dep. var.: external crisis start in t+1, 1980-2015, for 64 countries. Sample omits within crisis observations

Thres-

hold

Signal

power

% Missed

crises

% False

alerts

Threshold

std. dev. AUROC

NIIP -25 0.33 0.22 0.45 7 0.72

NIIP - FDI 12 0.12 0.27 0.61 3 0.49

NMED -16 0.39 0.2 0.41 3 0.73

Net short-term debt 204 0.01 0 0.99 68 0.11

Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62

Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52

Reserves 6 0.24 0.38 0.38 2 0.64

NIIP / relative per capita income -83 0.48 0.18 0.34 8 0.77

NMED/relative per cap. income -78 0.55 0.3 0.16 5 0.79

NIIP / imports -140 0.41 0.36 0.24 29 0.77

NIIP / external assets -192 0.42 0.33 0.25 44 0.73

Page 14: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

14

Interacting NIIP with income allows for better separating crisis vs. non-crisis episodes

Large red: crisis start in t+1, small red: crisis within 5 years, grey: no crisis 1980-2015, relative income is GDP in PPP per working-age person as % of G3

Page 15: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

15

Additional robustness checks

• Alternative interaction terms (trade and financial openness, NIIP composition) performing less well

• Income-interacted NIIP also performs well with respect to sample and threshold uncertainty

• Results are broadly confirmed using a different crisis definition (currency crises according to Laeven and Valencia, 2012)

Page 16: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

16

Estimated NIIP benchmarks

• NIIP norms and NIIP prudential benchmarks for 65 countries, 1995-2016

• Main patterns for NIIP benchmarks

NIIP benchmarks highly country specific

Prudential thresholds generally well below norm (2-sided)

Negative cross-section relation → tension between

factors underpinning scope for external borrowing and debt tolerance

Median NIIP and NIIP norms co-moving in time (but exceptions!)

Growing NIIP dispersion not matched by NIIP benchmark dispersion

Page 17: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

17

NIIP norm vs prudential threshold, average over time

Page 18: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

18

Median of NIIP, NIIP norm, NIIP pru thresh., World

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015year

Median NIIP/GDP Median NIIP norm

Median NIIP prudential threshold

Page 19: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

19

St.dev. of NIIP, NIIP norm, NIIP pru thresh., World

20

40

60

80

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015year

NIIP/GDP standard deviation NIIP norm standard deviation

NIIP prudential threshold standard deviation

Page 20: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

20

NIIP gaps – Main patterns

• Positive cross-section relation

• Few countries above norm but below prudential threshold (mostly lower income)

• Relatively persistent, stable distribution

• NIIP gaps signal asymmetric adjustment: negative reaction to negative NIIP gaps only, significant in the case of NIIP prudential thresholds

• [strong role of small countries with financial center status with large volatile NIIP]

• No significant reaction to lagged NIIP level relevance of country-specific benchmarks

Page 21: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

21

Gaps with norm and prudential threshold, average over time

Risky, yet above norm

Risky and below norm

Below norm, but 'safe'

Above norm and threshold

Page 22: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

22

NIIP adjustment follows negative prudential gaps, not NIIP levels

5-year non-overlapping periods. Country and time effects included. t-statistics in brackets.

Dep. Variable: avg. 5-year change of NIIP

Positive NIIP gap wrt. to norm, t-5 0.022

[0.41]

Negative NIIP gap wrt. to norm, t-5 -0.036

[-1.05]

Positive NIIP gap wrt. to 0.028

prudential threshold, t-5 [0.57]

Negative NIIP gap wrt. to -0.099***

prudential threshold, t-5 [-3.47]

NIIP if positive, t-5 -0.016

[-0.38]

NIIP if negative, t-5 -0.022

[-0.58]

Constant 3.44* 1.56 4.02

[1.91] [0.81] [1.34]

R² 0.078 0.106 0.075

Observations 323 323 323

Page 23: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

23

Conclusions

• NIIP dynamics have changed after the crisis: benchmarks needed for surveillance purposes

• This paper computes complementary country-specific benchmarks for NIIPs for advanced and emerging economies:

Two-sided NIIP norm

One-sided prudential threshold

• The benchmarks

permit interpretation of ongoing trends (e.g., fundamentals hardly explain growing global stock imbalances)

Are a better predictor of NIIP reversal than simple NIIP (or common benchmarks)

Help assessing current accounts (computing 'required current account' to reach country-specific target NIIP)

Page 24: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

24

Graph 11: ReqCA to reach NIIP norm v ReqCA to reach -10%

ARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARG

AUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUS

AUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUT

BELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBEL

BGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGR

BRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRA

CANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCAN

CHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHE

CHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHL

CHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHN

COLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOL

CRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRI

CYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYP

CZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZE

DEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEU

DNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNK

EGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGY

ESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESP

ESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTEST

FINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFIN

FRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBR

GRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRC

GTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTM

HKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKG

HRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRV

HUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUN

IDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDN

INDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDIND

IRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRL

ISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISL

ISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISR

ITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITA

JPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPN

KORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKOR

LKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKA

LTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTU

LUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUX

LVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVA

MARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMAR

MEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEX

MKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKD

MLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLT

MYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYS

NLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLD

NORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNOR

NZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZL

PAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAK

PERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPER

PHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHL

POLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOL

PRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRT

ROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROU

RUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUS

SGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVK

SVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWE

THATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHA

TUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUN

TURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTUR

UKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKR

URYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURY

USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA

ZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAF

-4-2

02

Re

qu

ire

d c

urr

en

t a

cco

un

t to

ha

lve

th

e N

IIP

ga

p w

ith

re

sp

ect to

-1

1%

-5 0 5 10Required current account to halve the NIIP gap with respect norm

Page 25: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

25

APPENDIX

Page 26: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

26

Current account norms 2016

Fundamentals only explain some of CA patterns. Non-fundamental controls are important.

Page 27: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

27

Graph 2: NIIP norms vs prudential thresholds, average

ARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGARGAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUS

AUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUTAUT

BELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBELBEL

BGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGRBGR

BRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRABRA

CANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCANCAN

CHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHECHE

CHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHLCHL

CHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHNCHN

COLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOLCOL

CRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICRICYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYPCYP

CZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZECZE

DEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEUDEU

DNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNKDNK

EGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYEGYESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESPESP

ESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTEST

FINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFINFIN

FRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAFRAGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGBR

GRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRCGRC

GTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTMGTM

HKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKGHKG

HRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRVHRV

HUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHUN IDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDNIDN

INDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDINDIND

IRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRLIRL

ISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISL

ISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISRISR

ITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITAITA

JPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPNJPN

KORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKORKOR

LKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKALKA

LTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTULTU

LUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUXLUX

LVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVALVA

MARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMARMAR

MEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMEXMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKDMKD

MLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLTMLT MYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYSMYS

NLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLDNLD

NORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNORNOR

NZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZLNZL

PAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAKPAK

PERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPERPER

PHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHLPHL

POLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPOLPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRTPRT

ROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROUROU

RUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUSRUS

SGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGPSGP

SVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVKSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVNSVN

SWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWESWE

THATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHATHA

TUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUNTUN

TURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTURTUR UKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKRUKR

URYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURYURY

USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA

ZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAFZAF

45' line

-100

-50

05

01

00

NIIP

no

rm

-150 -100 -50 0NIIP prudential threshold

Page 28: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

28

Graph 7: Frequency of NIIP gaps

Page 29: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

29

Graph 8: Distribution of NIIP gaps wrt. NIIP norm, World

-400

-200

02

00

400

NIIP

ga

p w

rt. n

orm

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Page 30: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

30

Graph 9: NIIP gaps wrt. NIIP prudential threshold, World

-200

02

00

400

600

NIIP

ga

p w

rt. p

rud

en

tia

l th

resh

old

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Page 31: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

31

Graph 10: Positive NIIP gaps with respect to norm

Page 32: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

32

Table 1: Baseline CA regression

(1) (2) (3) (4)

Dependent: Current account balance as % of GDP

Explanatory variables

Relative

to world

average

Interaction

term Coefficient

Statistical

significance

Relative income per capita in PPP (lagged) ✔ 0.034 ***

Relative income interacted with capital openness (lagged) ✔ ✔ 0.033 *

Ageing speed ✔ -0.025

Ageing speed wrt. world * income per capita (PPP) as %

of G3 mean ✔ ✔ 0.164 **

Old-age dependency ratio ✔ -0.047 *

Population growth HP-filtered (lagged) ✔ -0.576 **

Share of manufacturing in value added, instrumented ✔ 0.234 ***

Oil & gas balance / GDP 5Y-mov.av., if positive ✔ 0.427 ***

Mining products exports as % of total exports (lagged) 0.002

Domestic currency % use in world FX reserves -0.041 ***

Financial centre dummy 0.016 ***

NIIP / GDP (lagged, in USD terms) 0.032 ***

NIIP exceeding -60% of GDP (lagged) ✔ -0.030 **

VIX*(capital openness) (lagged) 0.084 ***

VIX *(capital openness) * reserve currency status ✔ -0.210 *

Annual real GDP growth expected 5 years ahead ✔ -0.310 ***

Public health expenditure / GDP (lagged) ✔ -1.739 ***

Health exp. wrt. world av., interacted with old-age dep.

ratio ✔ ✔ 4.773 ***

Structural fiscal balance, instrumented ✔ 0.272 ***

(FX reserve change)/GDP * capital closedness,

instrumented

✔ 0.338 **

REER growth (over 3 years, lagged) -0.086 ***

Construction investment / GDP (lagged) ✔ -0.099 ***

Change of private debt in pp. of GDP (over 3 years,

lagged) ✔ -0.059 ***

Private debt stock/GDP (demeaned by country historical

average) ✔ -0.011

Output gap / potential GDP ✔ -0.385 ***

Constant -0.392 **

R² 0.641

Adjusted R² 0.635

RMSE 3.42

Number of observations 1589

Durbin-Watson stat 0.54

Sample condition number 9.50

Page 33: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

33

Table 2: NIIP pru threshold estimates for external crises

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Threshold

Signal

power

associated

to (1)

%

Missed

crises

(type 1

errors)

% False

alerts

(type 2

errors)

#

Crisis

starts

#

Obs.

with no

crisis

Threshold

standard

deviation

Alternative

threshold

equalising

% type 1

and type 2

error

Signal

power

associated

to (8)

AUROC

NIIP -25 0.33 0.22 0.45 45 1790 7 -34 0.31 0.72

NIIP - FDI 12 0.12 0.27 0.61 45 1790 3 7 0.02 0.49

NMED -16 0.39 0.20 0.41 45 1790 3 -22 0.31 0.73

Net short-term

debt 204 0.01 0.00 0.99 7 440 68 27 -0.68 0.11

Short-term

debt liabilities 12 0.30 0.08 0.62 12 667 19 23 0.03 0.62

Gross debt

liabilities 25 0.10 0.04 0.86 45 1789 109 49 -0.07 0.52

Reserves 6 0.24 0.38 0.38 45 1796 2 6 0.22 0.64

NIIP / relative

per capita

income -83 0.48 0.18 0.34 44 1749 8 -102 0.46 0.77

NMED/

relative per

capita income -78 0.55 0.30 0.16 44 1749 5 -53 0.50 0.79

NIIP / imports -140 0.41 0.36 0.24 45 1790 29 -114 0.38 0.77

NIIP / external

assets -192 0.42 0.33 0.25 43 1777 44 -134 0.35 0.73

Page 34: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

34

Table 4. NIIP gaps vs. NIIP levels and NIIP adjustment

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

Explanatory variables Dependent variable: 5-year change in NIIP

NIIP gap wrt. to norm, t-5 -0.0153

[-0.541]

NIIP gap wrt. to prudential

-0.0227

threshold, t-5 [-0.971]

Positive NIIP gap wrt. to norm,

t-5

0.0219

[0.407]

Negative NIIP gap wrt. to norm,

t-5

-0.0359

[-1.046]

Positive NIIP gap wrt. to

0.0281

prudential threshold, t-5 [0.570]

Negative NIIP gap wrt. to

-0.0989***

prudential threshold, t-5 [-3.467]

NIIP, t-5

-0.0200

[-0.833]

NIIP if positive, t-5

-0.0164

[-0.383]

NIIP if negative, t-5

-0.0220

[-0.580]

Constant 4.390*** 5.311*** 3.442* 1.562 4.160** 4.015

[2.875] [4.863] [1.905] [0.811] [2.452] [1.335]

Observations 323 323 323 323 323 323

R-squared 0.073 0.077 0.078 0.106 0.075 0.075

Number of countries 65 65 65 65 65 65

Page 35: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

35

Table 5: NIIP adjustement and exchange rate regime

Dependent variable: 5-year change in NIIP Fixed exchange rates Flexible exchange rates

NIIP gap wrt. to norm, t-5 -0.04 0.00

NIIP gap wrt. to prudential

threshold, t-5 -0.04 -0.01

Positive NIIP gap wrt. to

norm, t-5 0.05 -0.03

Negative NIIP gap wrt. to

norm, t-5 -0.10** 0.02

Positive NIIP gap wrt. to

prudential threshold, t-5 0.029 0.05

Negative NIIP gap wrt. to

prudential threshold, t-5 -0.16** -0.07***

Observations 117 117 117 117 206 206 206 206

R-squared 0.21 0.21 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.08

Number of countries 33 33 33 33 51 51 51 51

Adjustment follows upon negative gaps, not positive ones

Page 36: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

36

Table 6. NIIP levels and adjustment, by country groups

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)

EU Advanced non-EU Emerging

Explanatory variables Dependent variable: 5-year change in NIIP

NIIP gap wrt. to norm, t-5 -0.0565

0.000287

0.00615

[-1.266] [0.0105] [0.293]

NIIP gap wrt. to prudential threshold,

t-5

-0.0628**

-0.0172

-0.0392

[-2.359] [-0.721] [-1.659]

Positive NIIP gap wrt. to norm, t-5

0.0778

-0.00601

0.0328

[0.548] [-0.101] [1.088]

Negative NIIP gap wrt. to norm, t-5

-0.0794

0.00584

-0.0149

[-1.463] [0.324] [-0.427]

Positive NIIP gap wrt. to prudential

-0.0137

0.0316

-0.00460

threshold, t-5 [-0.384] [0.455] [-0.108]

Negative NIIP gap wrt. to prudential

-0.119

-0.0988***

-0.0598*

threshold, t-5 [-1.501] [-5.882] [-1.904]

Constant 1.770 5.021*** 0.390 1.771 14.77** 17.17** 15.06** 10.37 0.857 0.509 0.306 -0.265

[1.204] [5.758] [0.172] [0.575] [2.289] [2.233] [2.548] [1.455] [1.246] [0.708] [0.358] [-0.253]

Observations 138 138 138 138 65 65 65 65 134 134 134 134

R-squared 0.224 0.250 0.251 0.272 0.126 0.129 0.127 0.151 0.134 0.160 0.140 0.168

Number of countries 28 28 28 28 13 13 13 13 27 27 27 27

Page 37: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

37

Table A1.2: NIIP cross-country averages

Page 38: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

38

Graph A1.3. NIIP norms based on differing starting values

Page 39: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

39

Graph A2.1: Signal power

a) Signal power as a function of different values

for an NIIP threshold

b) Signal power as a function of different values

for an NIIP/rel. p.c. income threshold

c) Signal power as a function of different values

for an NMED threshold

d) Signal power as a function of different values

for an NNMED/rel. p.c. income threshold

Page 40: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

40

Graph A2.2: AUROC, selected indicators

Page 41: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

41

Page 42: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

42

Median of NIIP, NIIP norm, NIIP pru thresh., EU

-60

-40

-20

0

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015year

Median NIIP/GDP, EU Median NIIP norm, EU

Median NIIP prudential threshold, EU

Page 43: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

43

CA norms vs 'norm' based on NIIP changes

Page 44: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

44

Page 45: Benchmarks for Net International Investment Positions · Short-term debt liabilities 12 0.3 0.08 0.62 19 0.62 Gross debt liabilities 25 0.1 0.04 0.86 109 0.52 Reserves 6 ... ITA JPN

45