BATTLE & LANGTON C.E. PRIMARY SCHOOL
MULTI USE GAMES AREA (MUGA) DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT May 2013
1.00 Introduction
2.00 Access & Location
3.00 Hours of Use
4.00 Environment and Ecology
5.00 Design
6.00 Policy
Appendices:
A.01 Initial Sport England Feedback
A.02 Precedent: The Haven MUGA, Eastbourne
A.03 Site Waste Management Plan (Draft)
CONTENTS Battle & Langton C.E. Primary School MUGA Design & Access Statemnt
This application is for a proposed Multi Use Games Area (MUGA) only at Battle and Langton Church of England Primary School. It is intended to be the first phase of a programme of improvement works to the school that will see the current temporary classrooms being permanently accommodated, as well as the provision of a new hall and supporting spaces. The MUGA will provide the school with sufficient external play space to allow for the temporary relocation of the mobile classrooms and facilitate the proposed development.
Site Address:
Battle & Langton C.E. Primary School Market RoadBattleEast SussexTN33 0HQ
1.00 Introduction
PROPOSED SITE PLAN (NTS)
PHOTO OF EXISTING PLAYING FIELDS
The proposed MUGA pitch will be located just west of the main school buildings, to one side of what are currently extensive grass sports pitches. These pitches were built when the school was relocated in the late 1980s from a cut and fill formation of the site; however, only half of the area was adequately drained. The school have explained that the pitches closest to the school are waterlogged for approximately 70% of the academic year, rendering them unusable to the school.
The existing hard play area, outdoor equipment play area and artificial pond to the east of the application site will be unaffected by the works.
The proposed MUGA will be accessed from the school buildings via a new level path, providing access throughout the year to all pupils and staff regardless of mobility and has been located close to the school buildings to ensure ease of access for all and reduce travel distances for pupils to maximise the MUGA’s use.
Existing pedestrian and vehicular access to and around the school will be unaffected by the proposal.
The northern edge of the proposed MUGA pitch is located 42m from the southern elevation of Saxonwood Care Home, beyond a mature hedge and trees. The school anticipate no increase in noise being generated compared to the existing use of the school grounds.
2.00 Access & Location
The proposed MUGA pitch will be used solely by the school within normal school hours, as well as after-school clubs and occasional summer ‘activity evenings’ up to 8.00pm. This represents no change from current school use of the playing fields and will therefore have no additional impact on the local community.
3.00 Hours of Use
The existing playing fields consist of poorly-drained, regularly-mown short grass on a clay soil and are thus considered unlikely to be of any significant ecological value.
There is an existing artificial pond, built by the school within the last ten years, has a butyl pond liner and limited vegetation. It is located 30.4m from the eastern edge of the proposed MUGA.
The northern edge of the MUGA site is located 10m from an existing mature beech hedge, beyond the anticipated root zone of the hedge.
The proposal for the MUGA pitch does not include any lighting and therefore will have no impact on local light pollution.
The existing school site covers approximately 26,400m2 (2.64ha) in total, and the proposed MUGA and associated paths will only cover 795m2 (0.0795ha) - equating to just over 3% of the site.
4.00 Environment & Ecology
PHOTO OF EXISTING POND AND OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT PLAY AREA
The proposed MUGA pitch will be made of green-coloured porous macadam laid on a permeable granular base. Sport England classify this as a Type 2 surface, appropriate for ball rebound sports. The MUGA has been sized at 37 metres long by 18.5 metres wide to allow the maximum variety of sports to be played on it with suitable run-offs.
This surface is permeable to water and will prevent water pooling on the pitch. The porous tarmac will also allow the water to percolate down through to the sub-base of the MUGA where it will be retained in perforated pipes prior to being discharged into the surface water drainage system, which will attenuate the flow of water. The tarmac will be coloured green.
The proposed perimeter fence is 3m high and constructed from anti-climb, weld-mesh fencing, to be powder-coated in a dark green finish. It is not the school’s intention to install floodlights for the MUGA.
5.00 Design
EXAMPLE PHOTO OF POROUS GREEN MACADAM SURFACE
While extensive, only half of the existing playing fields are adequately drained. This means that the school is currently unable to use the full area of the existing playing fields for the majority of the academic calendar due to the poor drainage and the consequent waterlogged ground. The proposed MUGA will provide the school with signifcantly improved sports facilities.
National Planning Policy Framework supports the loss of the exisitng playing fields and changing the use to a MUGA under two sections in Clause 74 which states if:
‘The loss resulting from the proposed development would be replaced by equivalent or better provision in terms of quantity and qulaity in a suitable location.’
‘The development is for alternative sports and recreational provision, the needs for which clearly outway the loss
In addition the proposed MUGA will enable the school to use a greater area of the site for sports all year round and as such, it would comply with exception E5 of Sport England’s adopted Playing Field Policy, ‘A Sporting Future for the Playing Fields of England’ (1996).
Previous guidance PPG 17 stated that ‘The proposed development is for an indoor or outdoor sports facility, the provision of which would be of sufficient benefit to the development of sport as to outweigh the detriment caused by the loss of the playing field or playing field.’
At present the Local Plan development boundary divides the school site and building (refer to drawing AR-XX-XX-PL-100-001 Location Plan). It is understood that this was a strategic move to protect the use of the school grounds. The proposal for a MUGA does not change the use of the school site and serves only to enhance the existing facilities for the pupils.
6.00 Policy
The following informal comments were sent from Katy Walker (Principal Planning Manager) at Sport England to David Vickers (Head of East Sussex Planning). The re-location of the proposed MUGA to the position suggested would be difficult due to the topography of the site. There is a valley with a small stream running at the bottom of it where the suggested position is which would make the construction of the proposed MUGA very difficult. It would also mean that space would have to be found for the school’s external playground and pond which would have to be re-located elsewhere.
A.01 Initial feedback from Sport England
1
Dan Gullock
From: David Vickers [[email protected]]Sent: 11 January 2013 13:46To: Terry Brown; Darren GuyettCc: Paul MenadueSubject: FW: Battle & Langton Primary School, BattleAttachments: Battle and Langton Primary.JPG
Further to the Open Planning Meeting on 7th November (?) Sport England have provided informal comments on the proposed MUGA. See below and the attachment showing a suggested alternative siting. Regards David Vickers Principal Planner (Development Control) Economy, Transport & Environment Tel. 01273 481629
Do you REALLY need to print this email ?
From: Katy Walker Sent: 11 January 2013 12:02 To: David Vickers Subject: RE: Battle & Langton Primary School, Battle
Dear David, Thank you for sending through that information. I am not sure we would be keen to support the MUGA in the proposed location. A more appropriate location would be that indicated blue on the attached aerial. Regards
Katy WalkerPrincipal Planning Manager
Creating sporting opportunities in every community
From: David Vickers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 06 December 2012 10:46 To: Katy Walker Subject: Battle & Langton Primary School, Battle
INFORMAL SUGGESTION FOR LOCATION RECEIVED FROM SPORT ENGLAND
AERIAL VIEW OF EXISTING SCHOOL SITE
The MUGA at The Haven CE/Methodist Primary School, Eastbourne, was installed during 2012 (Planning Application ref. EB/3033/CC). Both the playing surface and the surrounding fence are essentially identical to the MUGA proposed for Battle & Langton school.
A.02 Precedent: The Haven MUGA, Eastbourne
A.03 Site Waste Management Plan
Please note at the time of application there had not been a Main Contractor appointment. As a result parts of the site waste management plan will require to be completed at a more appropriate time.
1
Waste Disposal Site AssessmentMethod Statement
Description of works:
Materials expected to be removed from site are:Turf.Top soil.Sub soil.General building waste.To be separated into timber/paper/plastic.
Control Measures
Process Waste
1. All debris waste and environmental hazards shall be kept on site for minimal possible periods of time. When it is unavoidable to have waste on site it shall be kept behind secure fencing.
2. All waste is to be removed by the approved partner; the partner for this project is to be agreed with the ground works partner.
Waste Control
1. Waste reduction - the primary emphasis should be on not producing waste in the first place, by process change and optimising process efficiency.
2. Recovery of waste - including recycling (such as glass, metal and paper), composting and incineration with energy recovery.
3. Disposal - generally to landfill.
Waste Category
The selected waste partner will advise on the waste category. The majority of waste on this contract is deemed to be controlled waste.
2
1. Controlled waste – for these purposes defined as industrial and commercial waste or any substance which is scrap or is effluent or unwanted surplus from a process. The Waste Management Licensing Regulations 1994 SWMP 2008 Controlled Waste regulation 2012applies to such waste.
2. Hazardous waste - defined as waste which may be so dangerous or difficult to treat, keep or dispose of that hazardous provision is required for dealing with it. The Hazardous Waste Regulations 2009 and 2011apply to this waste. (would apply to asbestos or asbestos contaminated waste)
Controlled Waste
When disposing via the waste point at: (To be completed by Main Contractor)Ensure a current waste management licence is in place. Check with contract manager
1. Use partnering contractor to remove waste2. Segregate controlled waste from hazardous waste3. Segregate recyclables from un-recyclables where possible4. Segregate different recyclable materials. i.e. do not put timber in with
excavated material
Hazardous waste
Licence
To move or dispose of hazardous waste the carrier must have a licence.
Examples of Hazardous Waste from the Construction Process
1. Liquids with a flash point of 21 degrees centigrade or below. 2. Substances classified as harmful or toxic. ecotoxic - toxic to people or the
environment.3. Flammable4. Corrosive
Process
1. All hazardous waste will be removed via the partnering waste contractor 2. Keep all records and pass to contracts manager. 3. Records need to be kept of all hazardous waste movements - for 3 years
in the case of producers and carriers of the waste.
3
4. Records must also be kept of the location of any deposits of hazardouswaste in or on land.
Waste Control on site
1. Unauthorised mixing of different categories of hazardous waste or mixing hazardous waste and other waste is not permitted.
2. Load waste directly into skips where practicable3. Segregate controlled waste into categories where it is feasible on site. i.e.
timber, metal, masonry, plastic.4. Do not store waste on site.5. Only use licensed disposal contractors. See contracts manager for
approved list.6. Keep copies of waste disposal certificates. 7. Set aside recyclable waste at least 3m away from property for collection
by lorry.8. Do not burn any waste on site9. If in doubt about waste category speak to supervisor re disposal.10. Bund diesel storage tanks.11. Protect existing drains from liquefied soil and site debris.12. Wash down dirty vehicles on leaving site.13. Do not store waste near LPG or gas cylinders14. Do not load plasterboard into controlled waste skips.
Paper work
Only use approved waste removal companies who will issue a certificate on picking up and dropping of the skip
1. The skip weight will be recorded2. The load will be checked at the disposal centre for hazardous waste which
includes plaster board. 3. Collate invoice with ticket.
4
Site Waste Management Plan
Objective
To be cognisant of the waste produced on any project and to have methods of production to reduce waste.
Method
A reduction in the amount of construction industry waste arising on all sites will be achieved as follows: -
1. Data will be generated to enable a comparison of the amount of waste generated, in categories, against initial approximations of waste.
2. An approximation of the categories and total amount of waste for each project will be made pre start on site.
3. An approximation of the amount of waste for each project which would go to landfill will be made pre start on site.
4. The site supervisor will be set a target to reduce the amount of waste disposed to landfill, that was approximated pre contract start. This objective will be met by:-Using induction to educate sub contractors and operatives, segregation of waste, preventing cross contamination of waste with hazardous waste.
5. The use of the recycling and transfer facilities at head office, for the processing and storage of waste produced on site, which can be salvaged and be used for other purposes elsewhere.
6. Actual waste generated, in categories will be recorded.7. The actual waste generated will be compared with pre start
approximations throughout the project and post completion.
By using a performance indicator to increase in the amount of waste being recycled, reused, eliminated, or recovered, the site supervisor will be able to ensure that practical measures are taken to reduce waste, and the culture of sustainability established at the workface. This will be achieved by:
Buying and Storing Materials-
1. Analyse the products specified, their impact on the environment, during manufacture, transportation, packaging, in-use, and at end of life.
2. Order the amount of materials needed as accurately as possible;3. Consider when to have deliveries to reduce storage and material losses;
5
4. Consider the source of materials in relation to certification, environmental standards, quality, sustainable sourcing.
5. Process the packaging used for materials delivered to the site –recycle, return to source, and segregate.
6. Check the condition of deliveries return damaged materials for reprocessing by the manufacturer.
7. Plan Storage; prevent waste by keeping materials safe, and in areas where they are unlikely to be damaged through impact or contamination
8. Always store material in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations
9. Use plant to move and offload materials to reduce handling damage.10.The site is kept tidy to reduce material losses and waste.11.Liquids are stored away from drains in bunded areas to prevent pollution.
Site Activities
1. The site supervisor will consider using reclaimed and recycled construction materials that meet the materials specification. Frequently it is possible to use new materials on one face of the building and use recyclables on hidden or finished aspects.
2. The site supervisor will recycle suitable spoil, demolition materials, and surplus construction material arising from the works on site to avoid the need to transport materials.
3. A waste point will be set up to segregate waste4. Sorting of useable off cuts for other purposes.5. Collecting discarded materials for use.6. Returning damaged materials to the supplier7. Sorting packaging and returning to the supplier8. Returning materials to head office for sorting9. Delivering waste to L.A. recycling centres for sorting.10.Salvaging materials for resale11.Careful stripping out/ demolition to maximise amount of reusable product.
Training and awareness
1. Promote good practice awareness as part of the site induction / training for workers onsite.
2. Include training on environmental issues and sustainability. 3. Risk assessments to include environmental assessment and control
measures.
Waste Segregation
6
1. To encourage segregation of different types of waste as they are generated, using different skips where possible
2. At a minimum, where it is possible to accommodate, install skips for wood, inert and mixed materials, and a skip for metals.
3. Where there is a shortage of space and not enough room for multiple skips, recover and recycle as much as possible from mixed skips.
Client cooperation
1. Contractor to work with client to define what processes they want to see, and what recovery they are able to support and sanction.
2. Contractor to request more space for an onsite recycling centre if required.
3. Contractor to discuss the specification pre construction to look for waste reduction.
Minimisation of waste during the construction phase to be achieved by:
1. Careful measure of elements, to purchase correct sized raw material for conversion.
2. On reading the specification, suggesting alternatives to the specified materials, when waste reduction can be achieved, this is particularly relevant when other suppliers offer greater product size variation.
3. Purchase products in accordance with the specification or equal approved.4. Store materials carefully and keep them in good condition.5. Refer to the CA when the specification appears inconsistent or in error.6. Compare specification or bill to drawings and seek advice on
inconsistencies.7. Measure accurately prior to purchase of resources.8. Good housekeeping.9. Material logging and control techniques. Stock control.
7
Was
te P
lan:
SW
MP
MU
GA
Batt
le &
Lan
gton
C.E
. Prim
ary
Scho
olP
roje
ct in
form
atio
n
Proj
ect
nam
e M
ulti
Use
Gam
es A
rea
(MU
GA)
Proj
ect
Loca
tion
Batt
le &
Lan
gton
C.E
. Prim
ary
Scho
ol, M
arke
t Ro
ad, B
attle
, Eas
t Su
ssex
Proj
ect
cost
(es
timat
ed)
£150
,000
Floo
r ar
ea (
m2 )
Proj
ect
star
t da
teD
ate
Mon
thJu
lyYe
ar20
13
Proj
ect
end
date
Dat
eM
onth
Sept
embe
rYe
ar20
13
Site
loca
tion
desc
riptio
n
Play
ing
field
to
the
wes
t of
the
mai
n sc
hool
bui
ldin
gs, a
t Ba
ttle
& L
angt
on P
rimar
y Sc
hool
.
Clie
ntEa
st S
usse
x Co
unty
Cou
ncil
Prin
cipa
l Con
trac
tor
Des
igne
r
To b
e Co
nfirm
ed
IBI
Nig
htin
gale
Vers
ion
Num
ber
and
Dat
ePr
elim
inar
y 1
- 0
7/05
/201
3
8
Pre
pari
ng t
he p
lan
1. R
espo
nsib
iliti
es(T
o be
com
plet
ed b
y Cl
ient
and
Mai
n Co
ntra
ctor
)
Nam
e Co
mpa
nyCo
mpa
ny T
ype
(e.g
. Cl
ient
, Des
igne
r,
Prin
cipa
l Con
trac
tor
)
Cont
act
deta
ils
Who
is r
espo
nsib
le f
or d
raft
ing
the
SWM
P?M
ain
Cont
ract
or
Who
is r
espo
nsib
le f
or
impl
emen
ting
the
SWM
P?M
ain
Cont
ract
or
Who
is t
he w
aste
cha
mpi
on?
Mai
nCo
ntra
ctor
Who
is t
he p
erso
n in
cha
rge
of
the
proj
ect?
Mai
nCo
ntra
ctor
Whe
re w
ill t
his
SWM
P be
kep
t? (
a co
py s
houl
d be
on
site
)
Elec
tron
ic b
ased
doc
umen
tM
aste
r co
py in
off
ice
Pape
r ba
sed
docu
men
tCo
py o
n si
te -
Mas
ter
copy
in o
ffic
e
Dec
lara
tion
sta
tem
ent:
We
agre
e th
at t
he 'C
lient
' and
the
'Prin
cipa
l con
trac
tor'
will
tak
e re
ason
able
ste
ps t
o en
sure
was
te d
uty
of
care
is c
ompl
ied
with
, m
ater
ials
are
han
dled
eff
icie
ntly
and
was
te is
man
aged
app
ropr
iate
ly.
Sign
atur
e
Prin
t na
me
Dat
e
9
Pre
pari
ng t
he p
lan
2. W
aste
min
imis
atio
n(T
o be
com
plet
ed b
y Cl
ient
and
Mai
n Co
ntra
ctor
)
Use
the
tab
le b
elow
to
reco
rd d
ecis
ions
tak
en b
efor
e th
e pl
an w
as d
raft
ed o
n th
e na
ture
of
the
proj
ect,
des
ign,
con
stru
ctio
n m
etho
ds a
nd m
ater
ials
to
plan
was
te m
inim
isat
ion
i.e. r
educ
ing
the
amou
nt o
f w
aste
pro
duce
d
Type
Was
te M
inim
isat
ion
deci
sion
tak
enBy
who
mIn
tend
ed r
esul
tsAl
l Was
teM
inim
al a
mou
nt o
f no
n ex
cava
ted
mat
eria
l. G
ener
al b
uild
ing
was
te.
To b
e se
para
ted
into
tim
ber/
pape
r/pl
astic
.
All o
pera
tives
W
aste
sor
ted
on s
ite a
nd t
aken
to
tran
sfer
st
atio
n,
high
pr
opor
tion
dive
rted
fro
m la
ndfil
l
Tim
ber
base
d pr
oduc
ts
min
imal
–so
me
pack
agin
g su
ch a
s pa
llets
and
for
m
wor
kpo
sts
palle
ts t
o be
ret
urne
d to
car
rier
was
te t
imbe
r –
shre
dded
Goo
d tim
ber
Reus
ed n
ext
site
TBC
100%
ret
urn
to s
uppl
ier
Was
te T
imbe
r: C
hip
and
bulk
sen
t fo
r re
new
able
en
ergy
or
th
e ch
ipbo
ard
indu
stry
.Re
use
30%
tim
ber
boug
ht t
o si
te
Org
anic
Was
te –
Bush
essm
all t
rees
Com
post
Se
para
te s
kip/
col
lect
ion
poin
t TB
CAl
l to
be r
ecyc
led
zero
to
land
fill
Redu
ndan
t w
iring
All t
o be
rec
ycle
dTB
CSe
para
ted
from
pla
stic
she
aths
and
se
nt f
or r
ecyc
ling
Gen
eral
was
teSo
rted
into
cat
egor
ies
all r
eusa
ble
recy
clab
le p
rodu
cts
sepa
rate
d re
mai
nder
is t
hen
trea
ted
by t
he
was
te d
ispo
sals
par
tner
. Inc
lude
s te
xtile
s, s
ome
coat
ed/la
min
ated
tim
ber(
less
tha
n 1%
) So
me
plas
tics
TBC
Land
fill.
Gen
eral
was
te g
oes
thro
ugh
the
Shre
dder
and
is c
onde
nsed
for
la
ndfil
l
Pack
agin
gSo
rted
into
cat
egor
ies
and
sent
for
re
cycl
ing.
50%
to
be r
etur
ned
to
supp
lier.
50%
TBC
Plas
tics
and
timbe
r se
para
ted
10
Exca
vate
d m
ater
ial
sand
ston
eA
Spoi
l will
be
sepa
rate
d in
to
cate
gorie
s so
as
to m
axim
ise
recy
clin
g po
tent
ial l
l to
be
segr
egat
ed f
rom
gen
eral
was
te t
o av
oid
mix
ing.
To
be u
sed
as
hard
core
100%
mat
eria
l tha
t is
re
usea
ble
will
be
TBC
Pain
t tin
sU
nles
s ha
zard
ous
whe
n th
ey g
o fo
r sp
ecia
list
disp
osal
TBC
Goe
s th
roug
h th
e Sh
redd
er a
nd is
con
dens
ed f
or
land
fill
Haz
ardo
us W
aste
*N
one
fore
seen
–So
il su
rvey
to
be
cons
ider
ed
Met
als
Min
imal
Som
e w
iring
or
othe
r lig
htin
g or
si
gnag
e w
aste
onl
y
100%
rec
ycle
dTa
ken
to li
cens
ed s
crap
met
al
recy
clin
g
Arch
aeol
ogy
Unu
sual
exc
avat
ions
not
ified
to
Auth
oriti
es
Pro
posa
ls u
nder
con
side
rati
on:-
1.To
p so
il to
be
re c
over
ed a
nd u
sed
on s
ite t
o re
pair
area
s of
land
whe
re e
rosi
on h
as f
orm
ed u
nlev
el g
roun
d: R
educ
ed t
raff
ic/lo
rrie
s –
Savi
ng in
fue
l –Sa
fer
road
s
11
Pre
pari
ng t
he p
lan
3. F
orec
ast
(To
be c
ompl
eted
by
Clie
nt a
nd M
ain
Cont
ract
or)
Estim
ate
of w
aste
exp
ecte
d to
be
gene
rate
d on
thi
s pr
ojec
t by
vol
ume/
unit
Was
te m
ater
ial
M S
qSt
rip t
urf/
rem
ove
from
site
tbc
Strip
top
soi
ltb
cRe
mov
e su
rplu
s fr
om s
itetb
cEx
cava
te t
o re
duce
d le
vels
tbc
Tim
ber
tbc
Plas
tictb
cM
etal
stb
cCo
ncre
te p
rodu
ct -
Kerb
stb
c
12
Pre
pari
ng t
he P
lan
4. W
aste
Man
agem
ent
opti
ons
(To
be c
ompl
eted
by
Clie
nt a
nd M
ain
Cont
ract
or)
Sect
ions
1 -
4 sh
ould
be
com
plet
ed b
efor
e co
nstr
uctio
n w
ork
com
men
ces
onsi
te;
this
is th
e re
spon
sibi
lity
of th
e cl
ient
For
each
was
te t
ype
iden
tify
wha
t w
aste
man
agem
ent
actio
n is
pro
pose
d an
d ta
rget
s.
•As
a m
inim
um t
his
info
rmat
ion
shou
ld b
e sp
lit in
to in
ert,
haz
ardo
us a
nd n
on- h
azar
dous
was
te (
to c
ompl
y w
ith t
he S
WM
P Re
gula
tions
)
•Fo
r SM
ARTW
aste
Pla
n w
aste
nee
ds t
o be
rec
orde
d in
the
fol
low
ing
cate
gorie
s Br
icks
, Tile
s an
d Ce
ram
ics
Con
cret
e, I
nert
, In
sula
tion,
M
etal
s, P
acka
ging
, Gyp
sum
, Bi
nder
s, P
last
ics,
Tim
ber,
Fl
oor
cove
rings
(so
ft),
Ele
ctric
alan
d el
ectr
onic
equ
ipm
ent,
Fur
nitu
re,
Cant
een/
offic
e/ad
hoc,
Li
quid
s, O
ils,
Soils
, As
phal
t an
d ta
r, M
ixed
, H
azar
dous
& O
ther
•
Redu
ctio
n =
red
ucin
g th
e qu
antit
y of
the
was
te;
reus
e =
reu
se o
f m
ater
ials
/pro
duct
s fo
r sa
me
proc
ess;
rec
ycle
= p
roce
ssin
g of
m
ater
ial ;
rec
over
=co
mpo
stin
g, e
nerg
y re
cove
ry, r
emed
ial t
reat
men
t of
soi
l, ph
ysic
al s
ortin
g of
was
te (
whe
n on
e or
mor
e co
mpo
nent
s of
the
was
te is
rec
over
ed)
Was
te t
ype
Redu
ce
(%)
Reus
e (%
)Re
cove
r (%
)Re
cycl
e (%
)D
ispo
se (
%)
Cont
aine
r/Eq
uipm
ent
requ
ired
Was
te
Man
agem
ent
cont
ract
or
Any
rele
vant
ex
empt
ions
/lic
ense
s
Pack
agin
g
Mis
cella
neou
s/g
ener
al w
aste
Cem
ent
/bric
k pr
oduc
tsTi
mbe
r To
p so
ilpl
astic
sm
etal
sIn
ert
mat
eria
ls
Ove
rall
targ
et
13
Impl
emen
ting
the
pla
n
5. D
uty
of c
are
(To
be c
ompl
eted
by
Mai
n Co
ntra
ctor
)
It is
man
dato
ry t
o in
clud
e D
uty
of C
are
in t
he S
WM
P. T
he c
lient
and
prin
cipa
l con
trac
tor
mus
t ta
ke r
easo
nabl
e st
eps
to e
nsur
e w
aste
dut
y of
car
e an
d m
ater
ials
are
han
dled
eff
icie
ntly
, and
was
te is
man
aged
app
ropr
iate
ly.
Plea
se u
se t
he t
able
to
log
rele
vant
det
ails
:
Was
te M
anag
emen
t Co
ntra
ctor
Nam
eW
aste
Man
agem
ent
Co
ntra
ctor
Add
ress
Was
te c
arrie
r lic
ense
nu
mbe
r; d
ate
of is
sue
and
expi
ry
Was
te
man
agem
ent
licen
se n
umbe
r,
date
of
issu
e an
d ex
piry
Was
te T
rans
fer
note
s st
orag
e lo
catio
n
Regi
stra
tion
deta
ils w
ith t
he E
nviro
nmen
t Ag
ency
as
a ha
zard
ous
was
te p
rodu
cer.
Yes
No
Haz
ardo
us w
aste
reg
istr
atio
n nu
mbe
r; d
ate
of is
sue
and
expi
ry
14
Impl
emen
ting
the
pla
n
6. W
aste
Rec
ords
(To
be c
ompl
eted
by
Mai
n Co
ntra
ctor
)
It is
man
dato
ry t
o re
cord
the
iden
tity
of t
he p
erso
n re
mov
ing
the
was
te (
i.e. w
aste
man
agem
ent
cont
ract
or),
typ
es o
f w
aste
re
mov
ed a
nd w
here
the
was
te is
bei
ng t
aken
to.
Plea
se u
se t
he t
able
to
log
rele
vant
det
ails
:D
ate
was
te r
emov
edI
skip
/wee
k fo
r du
ratio
n of
co
ntra
ct
Type
of
was
te
Who
rem
oved
the
was
teSi
te t
he w
aste
has
gon
e to
iner
t
Iner
t ge
nera
l was
te
Top
Soil
Turf
wiri
ng
Met
als
fittin
gs
Bric
kwor
k/co
ncre
te
Tim
ber
Insu
latio
n
Oils
/liqu
ids
15
Impl
emen
ting
the
plan
7. T
rain
ing
/ co
mm
unic
atio
n(T
o be
com
plet
ed b
y M
ain
Cont
ract
or)
Trai
ning
Ever
yone
on
site
will
rece
ive
rele
vant
tra
inin
g w
hich
can
incl
ude:
•Th
e SW
MP
•Ro
les
and
resp
onsi
bilit
ies
•W
aste
pro
cedu
res
on s
ite•
Haz
ardo
us w
aste
•D
uty
of c
are
/ re
spon
sibi
litie
s•
Mat
eria
ls s
tora
ge•
Role
s an
d re
spon
sibi
litie
s
Form
s of
tra
inin
g u
sed
on t
his
site
?(p
leas
e ti
ck a
ll th
at a
pply
)In
duct
ion
Tool
box
tal
ksW
ork
shop
sO
ther
(pl
ease
sta
te)
Do
you
have
a t
rain
ing
log?
Ye
sN
o
If
no, p
leas
e us
e th
e at
tach
ed t
able
to
crea
te a
tra
inin
g lo
g
If y
es w
here
is it
kep
t?
Com
mun
icat
ion
How
are
you
com
mun
icat
ing
the
SWM
P o
n si
te?
(Ple
ase
tick
all
that
app
ly)
Mee
tings
Post
ers
Feed
back
fro
m s
taff
Oth
er (
Plea
se s
tate
)
16
Impl
emen
ting
the
pla
n
7. T
rain
ing
/ co
mm
unic
atio
n co
ntin
ued
Trai
ning
log
Nam
eCo
mpa
nyD
ate
Who
tra
ined
by
Type
of
trai
ning
Dat
e ne
xt
trai
ning
du
e/Fr
eque
ncy
17
Rev
iew
ing
the
plan
8. O
ngoi
ng r
evie
w o
f im
plem
enta
tion
(To
be
com
plet
ed b
y M
ain
Cont
ract
or)
The
SWM
P sh
ould
be
chec
ked
regu
larly
-us
e th
e ta
ble
belo
w t
o ke
ep a
log
of w
hen
the
plan
is t
o be
mon
itore
d an
d th
e ou
tcom
es. T
hepl
an m
ust
be
revi
ewed
not
less
tha
n 6
mon
ths
freq
uenc
y.
Dat
eN
ame
Actio
n to
be
carr
ied
out
Sum
mar
y /
Actio
n ca
rrie
d ou
tFu
rthe
r ac
tion
req’
d
Sect
ions
5 -
8 sh
ould
be
com
plet
ed d
urin
g th
e co
nstr
uctio
n pr
ojec
t, th
is is
the
resp
onsi
bilit
y of
the
mai
n co
ntra
ctor
18
Rev
iew
ing
the
Pla
n
9. C
ompl
etio
n re
view
(To
be
com
plet
ed b
y M
ain
Cont
ract
or)
This
sec
tion
mus
t be
fill
ed in
wit
hin
3 m
onth
s of
the
wor
k be
ing
com
plet
ed o
n th
is p
roje
ct (
i.e. p
roje
ct f
inis
h)
:
We
conf
irm t
hat
the
plan
has
bee
n m
onito
red
on a
reg
ular
bas
is t
o en
sure
tha
t w
ork
was
pro
gres
sing
to
the
plan
and
the
pla
n w
as
upda
ted
Sign
atur
e
Prin
t na
me
Dat
e
Ple
ase
expl
ain
any
dev
iati
on f
rom
the
ori
gina
l pla
n
This
sta
ge is
des
igne
d to
hel
p ev
alua
te t
he s
ucce
ss o
f th
e SW
MP,
and
to
iden
tify
key
‘less
ons
lear
nt’ t
o us
e on
fut
ure
proj
ects
, it
is
help
ing
striv
e fo
r co
ntin
ual i
mpr
ovem
ent.
Ple
ase
revi
ew h
ow s
ucce
ssfu
l you
bel
ieve
the
impl
emen
tati
on o
f th
e SW
MP
was
:
Rev
iew
ing
the
plan
9. C
ompl
etio
n re
view
con
tinue
d
19
Act
ion
plan
ned
for
nex
t pr
ojec
t:
Sect
ion
9 sh
ould
be
com
plet
ed w
ithin
3 m
onth
s of
the
proj
ect f
inis
hing
,thi
s is
the
resp
onsi
bilit
y of
the
mai
n co
ntra
ctor
This
pla
n sh
ould
be
kept
at
eith
er t
he p
rinci
pal c
ontr
acto
r’s p
lace
of
busi
ness
or
at t
he s
ite o
f th
e pr
ojec
t fo
r 2
year
s.
Top Related