doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.9864071.v2
Arene Dearomatization via a Catalytic N-Centered Radical CascadeReactionRory McAtee, Efrey Noten, Corey Stephenson
Submitted date: 22/04/2020 • Posted date: 23/04/2020Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0Citation information: McAtee, Rory; Noten, Efrey; Stephenson, Corey (2019): Arene Dearomatization via aCatalytic N-Centered Radical Cascade Reaction. ChemRxiv. Preprint.https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.9864071.v2
This photocatalysis methodology leverages N-centered radicals, from easily prepared γ,δ-unsaturatedN-arylsulfonyl enamides, to initiate a carboamination/dearomatization cascade reaction that generatesstereodefined 1,4-cyclohexadiene-fused sultams. This unique reactivity serves as a general platform for arenedearomatization and the fused heterocyclic products are viewed as valuable building blocks for drugdiscovery programs.
File list (1)
download fileview on ChemRxivArene Dearomatization_Stephenson_ChemRxiv_Final V... (774.60 KiB)
Arene Dearomatization via a Catalytic N-Centered Radical Cascade Reaction
Rory C. McAtee,[a] Efrey A. Noten,[a] and Corey R.J. Stephenson*[a]
[a]University of Michigan, Department of Chemistry, Willard Henry Dow Laboratory, 930 North University Ave., Ann Arbor MI
48109 United States.
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Arene dearomatization reactions are an important class of synthetic technologies for the rapid assembly of unique
chemical architectures. Herein, we report a catalytic protocol to initiate a carboamination/dearomatization cascade that
proceeds through transient sulfonamidyl radical intermediates formed via a concerted proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET)
of strong N−H bonds leading to 1,4-cyclohexadiene-fused sultams. These reactions occur at room temperature under visible
light irradiation and are catalyzed by the combination of an iridium(III) photocatalyst and a dialkyl phosphate base. Reaction
optimization, substrate scope, and mechanistic features of this transformation are presented.
Main Text
Arenes obtained from inexpensive petrochemical feedstocks are incorporated on industrial scale into pharmaceuticals,
agrochemicals, and organic materials. Selective dearomatization reactions[1] of these flat, two-dimensional aromatic
compounds are modular strategies to access substituted, three-dimensional chemical space, including fused, complex
heterocyclic skeletons.[2] In addition, the potential to form stereogenic centers through substituent addition concomitant with
the dearomatization process is particularly appealing. Of the selective dearomatization methods reported (including, UV-
promoted photochemical cycloadditions,[3] oxidative,[4] enzymatic,[5] transition metal-mediated,[6] and nucleophilic
dearomatizations[7]), the Birch reduction of arenes to 1,4-cyclohexadienes (1,4-CHD) is most well-known relying on liquid
ammonia as solvent and pyrophoric alkali metals at cryogenic temperatures (Figure 1A).[8] Modifications of the canonical Birch
reduction conditions have expanded the scope and synthetic utility of the reaction.[9] While both electrochemical[10] and visible
light-mediated[11] arene dearomatization reactions have been reported with proven utility, they have not been integrated with
other reaction pathways via reactive intermediates. An alternative strategy addressing the inherent drawbacks of the classic
Birch reduction is to promote an arene dearomatization via a radical cascade sequence. Radical cascades, processes in which
multiple chemical bonds are formed in a single operation, are step and atom-economical means to rapidly build complex
organic molecules (Figure 1B).[12] Moreover, initiating cascade sequences from strong N−H bonds leading to dearomatized
molecular frameworks has the potential to impact a variety of synthetic endeavors.
Figure 1. Inspiration and Design for Our Carboamination/Dearomatization Cascade Reaction Platform.
(A) The classic Birch reduction for arene dearomatization. (B) The design principle of using a radical cascade approach for
arene dearomatization. (C) This work: catalytic radical carboamination/dearomatization cascade reactions.
Concerted proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) has emerged as a powerful strategy for homolytic activation of strong
N−H bonds, often in the presence of weaker ones, avoiding the need for N-pre-functionalization.[13] The Knowles group recently
reported the activation of both amide[14] and sulfonamide[15] N−H bonds for intramolecular and intermolecular hydroamination
reactions, respectively, of electron neutral olefins. The authors propose an excited-state redox catalyst and a weak phosphate
base jointly mediate the concerted homolytic activation of the strong N−H bonds under visible l ight irradiation to afford transient
N-centered amidyl and sulfonamidyl radicals capable of adding to olefins with anti-Markovnikov regioselectivity. Separately,
Rovis and co-workers described the generation of amidyl radicals from trifluoroacetamide derivatives for sequential 1,5-HAT
and δ-C–H functionalization.[16] By using K3PO4 as base, trifluoroacetamides are deprotonated to the amide anions then
oxidized to the amidyl radical by the excited state of an iridium(III) photocatalyst.
With respect to sulfonamide-based N-radical alkene carboamination platforms, Chemler and co-workers have developed
racemic and enantioselective intramolecular Cu(II)-mediated oxidative N-radical cyclizations of alkenyl arylsulfonamides at
elevated temperatures (120 °C) to garner benzosultams in good yields. [17] Later, Kanai and co-workers reported an
intermolecular alkene carboamination reaction of aliphatic alkenes under Cu(I) catalysis and N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide
(NFSI) as both a bifunctional reagent, for C−C and C−N bond formation, and an oxidant for the concise synthesis of six-
membered sultams.[18] Very recently, Chen and Xiao described a process for a radical 5-exo cyclization/addition/aromatization
cascade of β,γ-unsaturated N-tosyl hydrazones under cooperative photocatalysis and cobalt catalysis enabling the synthesis
of dihydropyrazole-fused benzosultams.[19]
We reasoned that the work outlined above, along with our ongoing interests in alkene carboamination reactions with
bifunctional arylsulfonamide reagents,[20] would serve as a basis for developing a catalytic protocol to initiate a
carboamination/dearomatization cascade starting from γ,δ-unsaturated N-arylsulfonyl enamides 1 (Figure 1C). Ideally, this
process would proceed through transient sulfonamidyl radical intermediates formed via a visible light-mediated proton-coupled
electron transfer. This strategy obviates the need for N-pre-functionalization, elevated reaction temperatures, and
stoichiometric oxidants. The reaction would lead to the synthesis of 1,4-cyclohexadiene-fused sultams. Of note, fused sultams
have been shown to exhibit a broad range of biological activities[21] and have been used extensively as chiral auxiliaries for
chemical synthesis.[22] Herein, we describe the combination of the aforementioned reaction classes, whereby visible light-
mediated photoredox catalysis is used to promote and control a sulfonamidyl radical cyclization/dearomatization cascade
reaction.
At the outset, we recognized two major challenges in implementing this design strategy. The first was the potential for
competitive hydroamination,[13-15, 23] wherein the vicinal carbon-centered radical that is formed following N-radical cyclization
would undergo direct hydrogen atom transfer. The second challenge was rearomatization of the cyclohexadienyl radical
intermediate. With judicious choice of reaction additives and modifying reaction parameters we believed such challenges could
be surmounted.
Table 1. Reaction Optimization and Control Experiments.[a]
entry photocatalyst solvent yield (%)
1 A PhCF3 (0.2 M) 48
2 B PhCF3 (0.2 M) 32
3 C PhCF3 (0.2 M) 7
4 A PhCF3 (0.05 M) 67
5 A DMF (0.05 M) 50
6 A CH2Cl2 (0.05 M) 47
7 A 1,2-DCE (0.05 M) 65
8 A t-BuOH (0.05 M) 73
9 A PhCF3/t-BuOH (0.05 M) 83 (75)[b]
variation from best conditions (entry 9)
10 no blue LEDs 0
11 no photocatalyst 0
12 no NBu4OP(O)(OBu)2 0
See Supplementary Information for complete optimization details. [a]
Reactions were run on 0.1 mmol scale, and yields are determined by 19F-
NMR analysis relative to 1,3,5-trifluorobenzene (1 equiv) as an internal
standard. [b] Isolated yield of 2a on 0.2 mmol scale. Photocatalysts and
single-crystal X-ray of 2a:
Initially, we choose sulfonamide 1a as the model substrate to test the feasibility of the visible light-induced sulfonamidyl
carboamination/dearomatization cascade reaction and representative results are summarized in Table 1. The expected
reaction did occur with 1 mol% Ir photocatalyst A and 65 mol% of tetrabutylammonium dibutylphosphate base providing the
desired 1,4-cyclohexadiene-fused sultam 2a in 48% 19F-NMR yield and excellent diastereoselectivity (>20:1) following
irradiation with blue LEDs in trifluorotoluene (0.2 M) at room temperature (entry 1). Dearomatized product 2a was
unambiguously characterized by single-crystal X-ray analysis (CCDC: 1952459). Other iridium photocatalysts structurally
similar to A were also effective in these reactions (entries 2, 3), but the reaction yields diminished as the oxidation potential of
the excited-state species decreased. Importantly, decreasing the reaction concentration (0.05 M) delivered the desired product
in 67% yield (entry 4). Also, the reaction is moderately to equally successful in other solvents (entry 5-7) with tert-butanol
providing a noticeable increase in yield (entry 8). A 1:1 mixed solvent system of trifluorotoluene/ tert-butanol (0.05 M) was
finally identified as the optimal solvent combination (entry 9). When the reactions were run using conditions developed by
Rovis, relying on step-wise deprotonation/oxidation,[16] no product was isolated (See Supplementary Information for complete
optimization details). Control reactions of 1a lacking photocatalyst, base, or light were uniformly unsuccessful, and the starting
material was recovered unchanged (entries 10-12).
Next, we investigated the generality of this carboamination/dearomatization cascade reaction on a series of diversely
substituted sulfonamides (Figure 2). For example, arenes bearing various electron-withdrawing (2a-2j), electron-neutral (2n),
and electron-donating (2k-2o) groups delivered the desired dearomatized products in moderate to good yields (22-80%) and
excellent diastereoselectivity (>20:1). Of note, in the latter examples (2k-2o) featuring electron-donating groups, the
aromatized benzosultam product was isolated with the desired dearomatized product (See Supplementary Information for
complete details). Modifications to the alkene tether were well tolerated, allowing for the synthesis of an all-carbon spirocycle
(2p), tetracycle (2q), and cyclic carbamate (2r) in moderate to good yields (33-77%). Interestingly, 3-fluoro and 3,4-difluoro
substituted arylsulfonamide substrates generated single dearomatized regioisomers in good yields (2s, 2t) highlighting the
regio- and chemoselective nature of the C−C bond forming cyclization step. Furthermore, this methodology proved tolerant of
electron-rich heterocycles (2u), olefins (2v), amino acids (2w), aliphatic carbocycles (2x), and benzyl groups (2y) furnishing
the corresponding dearomatized products in good yields. Terminal olefin 3 failed to convert to the desired dearomatized
product (Figure 2C). Further, o-prenyl aniline derivative 4 and alkyl sulfonamide 5 were unreactive under the standard
conditions, returning starting material unchanged, highlighting the importance of the amide moiety for this process. Importantly,
many of the richly functionalized 1,4-cyclohexadiene products are envisaged to be valuable building blocks for post-
functionalization transformations. Studies to explore their synthetic utility are ongoing in our laboratory.
Figure 2. Reaction Scope.
(A) General reaction scheme; all reactions were run on 0.2 mmol scale and degassed by sparging with argon for 15 min prior
to exposure to optimized conditions. (B) Arylsulfonamide modifications. (C) Unsuccessful substrates. *Product isolated as an
inseparable mixture of diene and arene (between 3:1 to 1:4, diene:arene) (see Supplementary Information for full details).
To gain insight into the reaction mechanism, we initially performed Stern-Volmer luminescence quenching studies with
the model substrate 1a (See Supplementary Information). In accordance with previous studies by Knowles[15] and Molander,
[24] it was revealed that only in the presence of tetrabutylammonium dibutylphosphate base is the photoexcited state of catalyst
A quenched. Comparatively, there is no luminescence quenching when 1a is used alone. Performing cyclic voltammetry
studies of 1a in CH2Cl2 containing 0.1 M NBu4PF6 in the presence of varying concentrations of monobasic dibutyl phosphate
base, we found the onset oxidation potentials shifted to less positive potentials and current response increases with increasing
concentrations of phosphate base. Qualitatively, these results are consistent with a sulfonamidyl radical being generated under
a PCET process. Moreover, a deuterium labeling experiment was conducted to probe the role of tert-BuOH in this reaction.
By performing the reaction in the presence of tert-BuOD, the desired product (2a-D) was produced in 51% yield with complete
deuterium incorporation (Figure 3A). This result suggests that the tert-BuOH is serving as a reaction terminating proton
source, analogous to the classic Birch reduction.
Figure 3. Experiment to Probe Mechanism and Proposed Catalytic Cycle.
(A) Deuterium labelling experiment. (B) Proposed catalytic cycle.
A prospective catalytic cycle accounting for these observations, and those made during reaction optimization, is shown
in Figure 3B. In analogy to literature precedent,[15, 24] we anticipated that a phosphate base would first form a hydrogen-bonded
complex with the arylsulfonamide (i) N−H bond. The resultant non-covalent complex could participate in a concerted PCET
event with the excited state photocatalyst A leading to homolysis of the N−H bond and formation of a transient sulfonamidyl
radical intermediate (ii). Next, we expected the N-radical to undergo 5-exo cyclization onto the tethered alkene to furnish a
new C−N bond and a vicinal carbon-centered radical (iii). This alkyl radical is poised to undergo cyclization with the appended
arene to generate a stabilized cyclohexadienyl radical (iv) that can undergo single-electron reduction by the reduced Ir(II)
state of the photocatalyst (E[IrIII/IrII]= −1.07 V vs Fc+/Fc).[14] Favorable proton transfer between the cyclohexadienyl anion and
the phosphoric acid (pKa ≈ 12 in MeCN)[25] or tert-BuOH should follow delivering the dearomatized product, returning the
active forms of both catalysts.
In summary, we have reported the discovery and development of a proton-coupled electron transfer strategy to facilitate
a carboamination/dearomatization cascade reaction. Simple γ,δ-unsaturated N-arylsulfonyl enamides were converted into
complex and stereodefined 1,4-cyclohexadiene-fused sultams in satisfactory yields and excellent diastereoselectivity. This
mild catalytic system demonstrates a broad substrate scope and high functional group tolerance. Overall, we believe the
photochemical strategy outlined here will inspire future synthetic endeavors aimed at employing simple arene building blocks
for the rapid synthesis of complex, three-dimensional molecular frameworks in a single operation.
Experimental
To a dry 2-dram vial was added γ,δ-unsaturated N-arylsulfonyl enamides 1 (0.2 mmol), base, (65 mol%), and
photocatalyst (1 mol%). The vial contents were then dissolved in a 1:1 mixture of t-BuOH:PhCF3 (0.05 M). The solution was
degassed by sparging with argon for 15 min. The reaction was irradiated with two, H150 blue Kessil lamps positioned ~2 cm
away and cooled with an overhead fan for 14 hours. The reaction was concentrated in vacuo, loaded onto silica, and purified
by flash column chromatography to afford the desired 1,4-cyclohexadiene-fused sultams 2. No unexpected or unusually high
safety hazards were encountered. For detailed experimental procedures and characterization data for all compounds
presented above, see the Supplementary Information.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support for this research from the NIH (GM127774) and the University of
Michigan. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship for
RCM (Grant No DGE 1256260). We thank Dr. Jeff W. Kampf for assistance with X-ray crystallographic analysis.
Keywords
photoredox catalysis • dearomatization • sultams • 1,4-cyclohexadiene • proton-coupled electron transfer • N-centered radicals
References
[1] For reviews on dearomatization reactions, see: (a) F. C. Pigge, in Arene Chemistry: Reaction Mechanisms and Methods
for Aromatic Compounds (Ed. J. Mortier), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2015, pp 399–423; (b) S. You, Asymmetric
Dearomatization Reactions, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2016; (c) W. C. Wertjes, E. H. Southgate, D. Sarlah, Recent advances
in chemical dearomatization of nonactivated arenes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 7996–8017; d) C.-X. Zhuo, W. Zhang,
S.-L. You, Catalytic Asymmetric Dearomatization Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 12662–12686.
[2] (a) S. P. Roche, J. A. Porco, Dearomatization Strategies in the Synthesis of Complex Natural Products. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4068–4093; (b) A. Przydacz, A. Skrzynska, Ł. Albrecht, Breaking Aromaticity with Aminocatalysis: A
Convenient Strategy for Asymmetric Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 63–73.
[3] (a) P. J. Wagner, M. J. Sakamoto, Intramolecular triplet state cyclization of but-3-enoxyacetonaphthones. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1989, 111, 9254–9256; (b) P. J. Wagner, Photoinduced Ortho [2 + 2] Cycloaddition of Double Bonds to Triplet
Benzenes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 1–8.
[4] L. Pouysgu, D. Deffieux, S. Quideau, Hypervalent iodine-mediated phenol dearomatization in natural product synthesis.
Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 2235–2261.
[5] (a) T. Hudlicky, J. W. Reed, Celebrating 20 Years of SYNLETT: Special Account On the Merits of Biocatalysis and the
Impact of Arene cis-Dihydrodiols on Enantioselective Synthesis. Synlett 2009, 5, 685–703; (b) D. R. Boyd, T. D. H. Bugg,
Arene cis-dihydrodiol formation: from biology to application. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 181–192; (c) R. A. Johnson,
in Organic Reactions, Vol. 63 (Ed.: L. E. Overman), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2004, pp. 117–264. (d) T. Hudlicky, D.
Gonzalez, D. T. Gibson, Enzymatic Dihydroxylation of Aromatics in Enantioselective Synthesis: Expanding Asymmetric
Methodology. Aldrichimica Acta 1999, 32, 35–62; (e) M. Boll, Dearomatizing Benzene Ring Reductases. J. Mol.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 10, 132–142.
[6] (a) A. R. Pape, K. P. Kaliappan, E. P. Kündig, Transition-Metal-Mediated Dearomatization Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2000,
100, 2917–2940; (b) Z. X. Giustra, J. S. A. Ishibashi, S.-Y. Liu, Homogeneous metal catalysis for conversion between
aromatic and saturated compounds. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 314, 134–181.
[7] F. López Ortiz, M. J. Iglesias, I. Fernández, C. M. Andújar Sánchez, G. Ruiz Gómez, Nucleophilic Dearomatizing (DNAr)
Reactions of Aromatic C,H-Systems. A Mature Paradigm in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1580–1691.
[8] (a) A. J. Birch, The Reduction of Organic Compounds by Metal-Ammonia Solutions. Q. Rev. Chem. Soc. 1950, 4, 69–
93; (b) N. L. Holy, Reactions of the radical anions and dianions of aromatic hydrocarbons. Chem. Rev. 1974, 74, 243–
277.
[9] (a) J. L. Dye, K. D. Cram, S. A. Urbin, M. Y. Redko, J. E. Jackson, M. Lefenfeld, Alkali Metals Plus Silica Gel: Powerful
Reducing Agents and Convenient Hydrogen Sources. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9338–9339; (b) P. Lei, Y. Ding, X.
Zhang, A. Adijiang, H. Li, Y. Ling, J. An, A Practical and Chemoselective Ammonia-Free Birch Reduction. Org. Lett.
2018, 20, 3439–3442; (c) T. J. Donohoe, R. E. Thomas, The partial reduction of electron-deficient pyrroles: procedures
describing both Birch (Li/NH3) and ammonia-free (Li/DBB) conditions. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 1888–1895; (d) B. I. Yoo, Y.
J. Kim, Y. You, J. W. Yang, S. W. Kim, Birch Reduction of Aromatic Compounds by Inorganic Electride [Ca2N]+•e- in an
Alcoholic Solvent: An Analogue of Solvated Electrons. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 13847–13853; (e) M. Szostak, M. Spain,
D. J. Procter, Determination of the Effective Redox Potentials of SmI2, SmBr2, SmCl2, and their Complexes with Water
by Reduction of Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Reduction of Anthracene and Stilbene by Samarium(II) Iodide–Water Complex.
J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 2522–2537.
[10] B. K. Peters, K. X. Rodriguez, S. H. Reisberg, S. B. Beil, D. P. Hickey, Y. Kawamata, M. Collins, J. Starr, L. Chen, S.
Udyavara, K. Klunder, T. J. Gorey, S. L. Anderson, M. Neurock, S. D. Minteer, P. S. Baran, Scalable and safe synthetic
organic electroreduction inspired by Li-ion battery chemistry. Science 2019, 363, 838–845.
[11] (a) E. H. Southgate, J. Pospech, J. Fu, D. R. Holycross, D. Sarlah, Dearomative dihydroxylation with arenophiles. Nat.
Chem. 2016, 8, 922–928; (b) E. H. Southgate, D. R. Holycross, D. Sarlah, Total Synthesis of Lycoricidine and
Narciclasine by Chemical Dearomatization of Bromobenzene. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 15049–15052; (c) L. W.
Hernandez, J. Pospech, U. Klockner, T. W. Bingham, D. Sarlah, Synthesis of (+)-Pancratistatins via Catalytic
Desymmetrization of Benzene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 15656–15659; (d) M. Okumura, A. S. Shved, D. Sarlah,
Palladium-Catalyzed Dearomative syn-1,4-Carboamination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 17787–17790; (e) M. J.
James, J. L. Schwarz, F. Strieth-Kalthoff, B. Wibbeling, F. Glorius, Dearomative Cascade Photocatalysis: Divergent
Synthesis through Catalyst Selective Energy Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 8624–8628; (f) A. Chatterjee, B.
König, Birch-Type Photoreduction of Arenes and Heteroarenes by Sensitized Electron Transfer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2019.
[12] For selected reviews, see (a) L. J. Sebren, J. J. Devery, C. R. J. Stephenson, Catalytic Radical Domino Reactions in
Organic Synthesis. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 703–716; (b) K. L. Skubi, T. R. Blum, T. P. Yoon, Dual Catalysis Strategies in
Photochemical Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10035–10074; (c) M. P. Plesniak, H.-M. Huang, D. J. Procter, Radical
cascade reactions triggered by single electron transfer. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 1–16.
[13] (a) H. G. Yayla, R. R. Knowles, Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer in Organic Synthesis: Novel Homolytic Bond
Activations and Catalytic Asymmetric Reactions with Free Radicals. Synlett. 2014, 20, 2819–2826. (b) L. Q. Nguyen, R.
R. Knowles, Catalytic C–N Bond-Forming Reactions Enabled by Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Activation of Amide
N–H Bonds. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 2894–2903; (c) D. C. Miller, K. T. Tarantino, R. R. Knowles, Proton-Coupled Electron
Transfer in Organic Synthesis: Fundamentals, Applications, and Opportunities. Top. Curr. Chem. 2016, 374, 30.; (d) E.
C. Gentry, R. R. Knowles, Synthetic Applications of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 1546–
1556.
[14] G. J. Choi, Q. Zhu, D. C. Miller, C. J. Gu, R. R. Knowles, Catalytic alkylation of remote C–H bonds enabled by proton-
coupled electron transfer. Nature 2016, 539, 268–271.
[15] Q. Zhu, D. E. Graff, R. R. Knowles, Intermolecular Anti-Markovnikov Hydroamination of Unactivated Alkenes with
Sulfonamides Enabled by Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 741–747.
[16] J. C. K. Chu, T. Rovis, Amide-Directed Photoredox-Catalysed C–C Bond Formation at Unactivated sp3 C–H Bonds.
Nature 2016, 539, 272–275.
[17] (a) E. S. Sherman, S. R. Chemler, T. B. Tan, O. Gerlits, Copper(II) Acetate Promoted Oxidative Cyclization of
Arylsulfonyl-o-allylanilines. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1573–1575; (b) W. Zeng, S. R. Chemler, Copper(II)-Catalyzed
Enantioselective Intramolecular Carboamination of Alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12948–12949; For a review,
see: (c) S. R. Chemler, The Enantioselective Intramolecular Aminative Functionalization of Unactivated Alkenes, Dienes,
Allenes and Alkynes for the Synthesis of Chiral Nitrogen Heterocycles. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 3009–3019.
[18] K. Kaneko, T. Yoshino, S. Matsunaga, M. Kanai, Sultam Synthesis via Cu-Catalyzed Intermolecular Carboamination of
Alkenes with N-Fluorobenzenesulfonimide. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 2502–2505.
[19] Q.-Q. Zhao, X.-Q. Hu, M.-N Yang, J.-R. Chen, W.-J. Xiao, A Visible-Light Photocatalytic N-Radical Cascade of
Hydrazones for the Synthesis of Dihydropyrazole-Fused Benzosultams. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 12749–12752.
[20] T. M. Monos, R. C. McAtee, C. R. J. Stephenson, Arylsulfonylacetamides as Bifunctional Reagents for Alkene
Aminoarylation. Science 2018, 361, 1369–1373.
[21] (a) G. J. Wells, M. Tao, K. A. Josef, R. Bihovsky, 1,2-Benzothiazine 1,1-Dioxide P2−P3 Peptide Mimetic Aldehyde Calpain
I Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3488–3503; (b) Y. Xie, G. Gong, Y. Liu, S. Deng, A. Rinderspacher, L. Branden,
D. W. Landry, Convenient Preparation of N-8-quinolinyl Benzenesultams as Novel NF-κB Inhibitors. Tetrahedron Lett.
2008, 49, 2320–2323; (c) L. H. Silver, Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Brinzolamide (Azopt), a New Topical Carbonic
Anhydrase Inhibitor for Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension. Brinzolamide Primary Therapy Study
Group. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 1998, 126, 400–408.
[22] (a) K. H. Ahn, C. Ham, S. Kim, C. Cho, Practical Synthesis of Chiral Sultam Auxiliaries: 3-Substituted- 1,2-
benzisothiazoline 1,1-Dioxides. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7047–7048; (b) K. H. Ahn, H.-H. Baek, S. J. Lee, C.-W. Cho,
Synthesis of Chiral Benzosultams: 3-Functionalized 1,2-Benzisothiazoline 1,1-Dioxides. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7690–
7696; (c) G. Kumaraswamy, M. Padmaja, B. Markondaiah, N. Jena, B. Sridhar, M. U. Kiran, Oppolzer Sultam Directed
Aldol as a Key Step for the Stereoselective Syntheses of Antitumor Antibiotic Belactosin C and Its Synthetic Congeners.
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 337–340.
[23] (a) S. T. Nguyen, Q. Zhu, R. R. Knowles, PCET-Enabled Olefin Hydroamidation Reactions with N-Alkyl Amides. ACS
Catal. 2019, 9, 4502–4507; (b) A. J. Musacchio, B. C. Lainhart, X, Zhang, S. G. Naguib, T. C. Sherwood, R. R. Knowles,
Catalytic intermolecular hydroaminations of unactivated olefins with secondary alkyl amines. Science 2017, 355, 727–
730; (c) D. C. Miller, G. J. Choi, H. S. Orbe, R. R. Knowles, Catalytic Olefin Hydroamidation Enabled by Proton-Coupled
Electron Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13492–13495; (d) T. M. Nguyen, D, A. Nicewicz, Anti-Markovnikov
Hydroamination of Alkenes Catalyzed by an Organic Photoredox System. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9588-9591; (e)
T. M. Nguyen, N. Manohar, D. A. Nicewicz, anti‐Markovnikov Hydroamination of Alkenes Catalyzed by a Two‐
Component Organic Photoredox System: Direct Access to Phenethylamine Derivatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014,
53, 6198-6201; (f) P. D. Morse, D. A. Nicewicz, Divergent regioselectivity in photoredox-catalyzed hydrofunctionalization
reactions of unsaturated amides and thioamides. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 270-274; (g) J. Chen, H. -M. Guo, Q. -Q. Zhao, J.
-R. Chen, W.-J. Xiao, Visible light-driven photocatalytic generation of sulfonamidyl radicals for alkene hydroamination of
unsaturated sulfonamides. Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 6780- 6783; (h) Intermolecular Radical Mediated Anti-
Markovnikov Alkene Hydroamination Using N-Hydroxyphthalimide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 12318-12322.
[24] S. Zheng, Á. Gutiérrez-Bonet, G. A. Molander, Merging Photoredox PCET with Ni-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling: Cascade
Amidoarylation of Unactivated Olefins. Chem 2019, 5, 339–352.
[25] M. Rueping, B. J. Nachtsheim, W. Ieawsuwan, I. Atodiresei, Modulating the Acidity: Highly Acidic Brønsted Acids in
Asymmetric Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6706–6720.
TOC Figure
download fileview on ChemRxivArene Dearomatization_Stephenson_ChemRxiv_Final V... (774.60 KiB)
Top Related