Differences Between API-2000 5th and 6th Editions
Brad OtisApril 26, 2010
2010 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting
The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly or indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this presentation the expressions "Shell", "Group" and "Shell Group" are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Group companies in general. Likewise the words "we", "us" and "our" are also used to refer to Group companies in general or those who work for them. The expressions are also used where there is no purpose in identifying specific companies.
Shell Global Solutions is a network of independent technology companies in the Shell Group. In this presentation the expression ‘Shell Global Solutions’ is sometimes used for convenience where reference is made to these companies in general, or where no useful purpose is served by identifying a particular company. The information contained in this presentation contains forward-looking statements, that are subject to risk factors which may affect the outcome of the matters covered. None of Shell International B.V., any other Shell company and their respective officers, employees and agents represents the accuracy or completeness of the information set forth in this presentation and none of the foregoing shall be liable for any loss, cost, expense or damage (whether arising from negligence or otherwise) relating to the use of such information.
The information contained in this presentation is intended to be general in nature and must not be relied on as specific advice in connection with any decisions you may make. Shell Global Solutions is not liable for any action you may take as a result of you relying on such material or for any loss or damage suffered by you as a result of you taking this action. Furthermore, these materials do not in any way constitute an offer to provide specific services. Some services may not be available in certain countries or political subdivisions thereof.
Copyright © 2010 Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc. All copyright and other (intellectual property) rights in all text, images and other information contained in this presentation are the property of Shell International B.V. or other Shell companies. Permission should be sought from Shell International B.V. before any part of this presentation is reproduced, stored or transmitted by any means, electronic or mechanical including by photocopy, recording or information storage and retrieval system.
Agenda Recent History Significant Differences
o Normal Tank Ventingo Internal Deflagrationo Flame Propagation Through PVVso Refrigerated Tank Ventingo Testing of Venting Devices
Path Forward
Recent History API-2000 5th Edition
o Published April 1998o Work started on 6th edition
ISO - 28300o New work item submitted in June 2006o Convert and update API-2000 into ISO Standard o FDIS 28300 submitted Jan 2008o Memo highlighting differences issuedo FDIS approved with no negative ballots
API adopted-back in Dec 09 with no negative ballots Now working 2nd edition of ISO-28300 (API-2000 7th
edition)
Microsoft Office Word 97 - 2003 Document
Significant DifferencesNormal Tank Venting EN 14015 Tank Venting
o EN 14015 Tank design standard used in Europeo Venting model based on theory and validated via testo Applicable to any tank service, any temperature, and
any sizeo Therefore placed in main body of ISO standard
API-2000 5th Edition Tank Venting o Venting model based on theory with simplified
assumptionso Applicable to hexane or similar services, temperature
< 120 F, and tanks < 180,0000 bblso Therefore placed in Annex A of ISO standard
EN-14015 Validation TestTests and model calculations at Hoechst in 1980 and 1981
• Tank: V = 617 m3; D = 8,5 m; H = 10,6 m• 17 °C ≤ Δ T ≤ 26 °C• Water (rain) flow density: about 60 kg/m2h• TRbF-model calculation
Significant Differences
Normal Tank Venting - continued Discussion
o Both methods are acceptable when applied correctlyo Both were included
• To fill gap where Annex A method does not apply• To allow continued use of the Annex A method• To ensure global support for the FDIS
o EN-14015 vent loads can be higher than Annex A• Calculations and comparison courtesy of Protego
(USA) Inc.
Calculation – ExamplesTank 1
Tank:- Height: 5m- Diameter: 7m- Tank volume: 192.4 m3- Pump in rate: 96 m3/h- Pump out rate: 96 m3/h- Vertical tank- No insulation- MAWP: 7.5 mbar- MAWV: 2.5 mbar
Inbreathing Requirements (Total) for Tank 1
Inbreathing requirements Tank 1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
API 2000 EN 14015,North, VPHexane
EN 14015,North, VP>
Hexane
EN 14015, 42-58, VP Hexane
EN 14015, 42-58, VP>Hexane
EN 14015,South, VPHexane
EN 14015,South, VP>
Hexane
TRbF 20
Ve
nti
ng
re
qu
ire
me
nts
[m
3/h
]
Pump out Thermal
Outbreathing Requirements (Total) for Tank 1
226
116 117 123 130
118 122109
Outbreathing requirements Tank 1
0
50
100
150
200
250
API 2000, FP<37.8C
API 2000, FP>=37.8C
EN 14015,North
EN 14015, 42-58
EN 14015,South
TRbF 20 TRbF 20-2 TRbF 20-3
Ve
nti
ng
re
qu
ire
me
nts
[m
3/h
]
Pump in Thermal
H/D = 0.5
H/D = 2H/D = 0.71
Overview Inbreathing Venting Requirements (thermal)Small tanks (<3,180 m3)
Comparision Venting Requirements for Thermal Inbreathing
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
100 200 500 1000 2000 3180
Tank Volume [m3]
Ve
ntin
g R
eq
uir
em
en
ts [m
3/h
]
API 2000 EN 14015, North, VP Hexane, T<25C EN 14015, North, VP> Hexane, T>= 25C
EN 14015, 42-58, VP Hexane, T<25C EN 14015, 42-58, VP>Hexane, T<25C EN 14015, South, VP Hexane, T< 25C
EN 14015, South, VP>Hexane, T>=25C TRbF 20
Overview Inbreathing Venting Requirements (thermal)Large tanks (>3,180 m3)
Comparision Venting Requirements for Thermal Inbreathing
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
5000 10000 20000 50000 100000
Tank Volume [m3]
Ve
ntin
g R
eq
uir
em
en
ts [m
3/h
]
API 2000 EN 14015, North, VP Hexane, T<25C EN 14015, North, VP> Hexane, T>= 25C
EN 14015, 42-58, VP Hexane, T<25C EN 14015, 42-58, VP>Hexane, T<25C EN 14015, South, VP Hexane, T< 25C
EN 14015, South, VP>Hexane, T>=25C TRbF 20
Outside scope of API 2000
Overview Outbreathing Venting Requirements (thermal)Small tanks (<3,180 m3)
Comparision Venting Requirements Outbreathing, Thermal
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
100 200 500 1000 2000 3180
Tank Volume [m3}
Ve
ntin
g R
eq
uir
em
en
ts [m
3/h
]
API, FP<37.8C API, FP>37.8C EN 14015, North EN 14015, 42-58 EN 14015, South TRbF 20
Overview Outbreathing Venting Requirements (thermal)Large tanks (>3,180 m3)
Comparision Venting Requirements Outbreathing, Thermal
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
5000 10000 20000 50000 100000
Tank Volume [m3}
Ve
ntin
g R
eq
uir
em
en
ts [m
3/h
]
API, FP<37.8C API, FP>37.8C EN 14015, North EN 14015, 42-58 EN 14015, South TRbF 20
Outside scope of API 2000
Significant Differences
Normal Tank Venting - continued Discussion
o “Operational experience with petroleum or petrochemical fluid storage tanks indicates that tank failures/damage due to vacuum have not been caused by inadequate venting when that relief system is designed using the method in this Annex”
o Tanks that meet the criteria in Annex A can have tank vents designed using the method shown in Annex A.
o Tanks that don’t meet the Annex A criteria, then the general method in 4.3.2.1 should be used.
Questions?
Significant Differences
Internal Deflagration New section on tank internal deflagration Provides examples on how this may be mitigated Previously no “home” for this issue Detailed presentation on this on 4/28/10 at API-2000
meeting
Questions?
Significant Differences
Flame Propagation Through PVV The 5th edition states “A flame arrester is not
considered necessary for use in conjunction with a PV valve venting to atmosphere because flame speeds are less than vapor velocities across the seats of PV.”
Recent controlled experiments have shown that flash back through a PVV is possible during very low unstable outflow conditions or if there is an external flammable vapor cloud that ignites with sufficient overpressure to lift the vacuum pallet.
Significant Differences
Flame Propagation Through PVV - continued API-2010 and NFPA-30 have language similar to what
was stated in the 5th edition of API-2000 Until those standards are updated, there will appear to
be an inconsistency on this issue.
Questions?
Significant Differences
Refrigerated Tank Venting Completely re-written Previously was based on hexane Borrowed heavily from EN14620 and EN1473
Questions?
Significant Differences
Testing of Venting Devices New section to provide consistency in capacity testing Combination of API 2000 5th edition section 4.6 and EN
14015 Annex L.6.
Questions?
Path Forward
2nd Edition of ISO-28300 is being worked now Fall 2010 is deadline for submitting new items
Top Related