“Appraisal Report”
of
9.94 acres of land
at
8161 & 8167 A D Mims Road
in
Orlando, FL 32818
Prepared For:
Ms. Tricia Masih-Das
1108 Foxforrest Circle
Apopka, FL 32712
Our File # 17-325
Date of Inspection October 25, 2017
Date of Value October 25, 2017
Dan Peele’s Certification Number RZ 887
Daniel L. Peele, ASA Accredited Senior Appraiser
By
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants
3956 Town Center Boulevard, Unit 133
Orlando, FL 32837
407-286-5584
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 2
November 2, 2017
Tricia Masih-Das
1108 Foxforrest Circle
Apopka, FL 32712
As requested, we have appraised two abutting parcels which comprise a 9.94 acre parcel of land on
A D Mims Road in NW Orange County, FL. One of the parcels is improved with a 1985 single
family residence which has a negative value since it must be removed prior to site redevelopment.
The property is listed for sale for $1,295,000 in an “as is” condition, please see a copy of the MLS
Listing flyer in this report. Single family subdivisions abut each side of the subject and reflect the
highest and best use.
The purpose of the appraisal was to “form opinions” of the “as is” market value of the fee simple
interest, as of the effective date of the appraisal, the date of our most recent inspection (see Cover)
as shown in the table below.
Market value, fee simple interest, leased fee interest and other appraisal terms are defined within the
text of the report.
As a result of our investigation into those matters which affect market value, and by virtue of our
experience and training, we have formed the following opinions of the “As Is” market values:
ONE-MILLION-TWO-HUNDRED-EIGHTY-FIVE-THOUSAND-DOLLARS
$1,285,000
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 3
As per your request, submitted herein is an "Appraisal Report" on the above referenced property.
The scope of this report is to provide an "Appraisal Report" which is intended to comply with the
reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 1 and 2-2 (a) of the Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice for an "Appraisal Report".
Your attention is directed to the "General Assumptions", "General Limiting Conditions" and
"Certification" that are considered usual for this type of assignment and have been included within
the text of this report.
The appraisal analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed and this appraisal report has been
prepared in conformance with (and use of this report is subject to) all regulations issued by the
appropriate regulatory entities, regarding the enactment of Title XI of the Financial Institution
Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), the Uniform Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice as promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation.
This letter of transmittal precedes the full narrative appraisal report, further describing the subject
and containing the reasoning and most pertinent data leading to the final value estimate. Your
attention is directed to the "General Assumptions", "General Limiting Conditions" and
"Certification" that are considered usual for this type of assignment and have been included within
the text of this report.
“This appraisal has been prepared in conformity with the code of ethics of the American Society
of (ASA), and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice as promulgated by the
Appraisal Foundation."
Respectfully submitted,
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants
Daniel L. Peele, ASA
State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser 887
407-286-5584 (office)
407-230-1023 (cell)
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 4
CERTIFICATION
The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
The reported analysis, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions andlimiting conditions and are my personal, impartial and unbiased professional analysis opinions andconclusions.
I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and nopersonal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; any specified interest or bias has notaffected the impartiality of my opinions and conclusions.
I have not performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property thatis the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of thisassignment.
I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involvedwith this assignment.
My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predeterminedresults.
My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development orreporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, theamount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequentevent directly related to the intended use of the appraisal.
My analyses, opinions, and conclusions, were developed, and this report has been prepared, inconformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report.
No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification
Daniel L. Peele, ASAState Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ [email protected]
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 5
SUMMARY OF APPRAISAL
Property Type Subdivision Land upon approval to redevelop
Highest and Best Use Residential subdivision
Property Rights Appraised Fee Simple Interest
Insurable Value (for Fire Insurance Purposes) Please see Improvement Data Section
Flood Zone Panel Census Tract (CT) 120 95C 0210F 9-25-2009 150.04
Please see Addenda for complete flood information.
Flood Zone (FZ) & Hazard X See Definitions in the addenda
Extraordinary Assumptions & Hypothetical Conditions See Overview of Appraisal
Conditions: This appraisal is subject to the "General Assumptions,” "General Limiting Conditions"
and "Certification" included in the text.
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION:
CERTIFICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
SUMMARY OF APPRAISAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
GENERAL LIMITING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
OVERVIEW OF APPRAISAL ASSIGNMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Extraordinary Assumptions and Hypothetical Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Intended Use of Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Intended User of Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Competency of Appraisers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Scope of Appraisal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Interest Appraised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Market Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Highest and Best Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Fee Simple Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Extraordinary Assumptions / Special Assumptions, Full Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Hypothetical Conditions, Full Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
DATA PRESENTATION
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Neighborhood Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
NEIGHBORHOOD DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Legal Description (from deed) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Three (3) Year History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Tax Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
SITE DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
HIGHEST AND BEST USE ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Exposure Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Marketing Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
APPRAISAL PROCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
SALES COMPARISON APPROACH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Subject Listing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 7
Comparable Sales Summary - Please see addenda for Comparable Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Market Value (Land) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
ADDENDA
QUALIFICATIONS OF DANIEL PEELE, ASA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Certified General Appraiser License RZ 887 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Tax Card -8661 A D Mims Road . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Flood Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
FEMA Flood Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Property Report from RPR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Comparable Sales from Xceligent Data Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 8
GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS
1. The legal description used in this report is assumed to be correct.
2. No survey of the property has been made by the consultant and no responsibility is assumedin connection with such matters. Sketches in this report are included only to assist the readerin visualizing the property.
3. No responsibility is assumed for matters of legal nature affecting title to the property nor isan opinion of title rendered. The title is assumed to be good and merchantable.
4. Information and data furnished by others is usually assumed to be true, correct and reliable.When such information and data appears to be dubious and when it is critical to the analysis,a reasonable effort has been made to verify all such information; however, no responsibilityfor its accuracy is assumed by the consultant.
5. All mortgages, liens, encumbrances, leases, and servitudes have been disregarded unless sospecified within the report. The property is analyzed as though under responsible ownershipand competent management.
6. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, orstructures which would render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed forsuch conditions or for engineering which may be required to discover them.
7. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state and localenvironmental regulations and laws unless noncompliance is stated, defined and consideredin this report.
8. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have beencomplied with, unless a nonconformity has been stated, defined and considered in this report.
9. It is assumed that all required licenses, consents or other legislative or administrativeauthority from any local, state, or national governmental or private entity or organizationhave been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate containedin this report is based.
10. It is assumed that the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries orproperty lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unlessnoted within this report.
11. We are not expert in determining the presence or absence of hazardous substances, definedas all hazardous or toxic materials, wastes, pollutants or contaminants (including, but notlimited to, asbestos, PCB, UFFI, or other raw materials or chemicals) used in construction,or otherwise present on the property. We assume no responsibility for the studies or analyseswhich would be required to determine the presence or absence of such substances or for lossas a result of the presence of such substances.
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 9
GENERAL LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. The consultant will not be required to give testimony or appear in court because of havingmade this analysis, with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have beenpreviously made thereof.
2. Possession of the report, or copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. Itmay not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to whom it is addressedwithout the written consent of the consultant, and in any event only with proper writtenqualifications and only in its entirety.
3. The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements, if any,applies only under the reported highest and best use of the property. The allocations of valuefor land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and areinvalid if so used.
4. No environmental impact studies were either requested or made in conjunction with thisanalysis, and the consultant hereby reserves the right to alter, amend, revise, or rescind anyof the value opinions based upon any subsequent environmental impact studies, research andinvestigation.
5. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report, or copy thereof, shall be conveyed tothe public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or any other media withoutwritten consent and approval of the consultant. Nor shall the consultant, firm or professionalorganization of which the consultant is a member be identified without written consent ofthe consultant.
6. Neither our name nor report may be used in conjunction with any financing plans whichwould be classified as a public offering under state or federal securities laws.
7. Acceptance of and/or use of this report constitutes acceptance of the foregoing GeneralAssumptions and General Limiting Conditions.
8. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 sets strict and specific standards forhandicapped access to and within most commercial and industrial buildings. Determinationof compliance with these standards is beyond appraisal expertise and, therefore, has not beenattempted by the appraisers. For purposes of this appraisal, we are assuming the building isin compliance; however, we recommend an architectural inspection of the building todetermine compliance or requirements for compliance. We assume no responsibility for thecost of such determination and our appraisal is subject to revision if the building is not incompliance.
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 10
OVERVIEW OF APPRAISAL ASSIGNMENT
Purpose of Appraisal
See “Letter of Transmittal”.
Extraordinary Assumptions and Hypothetical Conditions
No soil contamination
No adverse easements
Subject can gain approvals for sfr subdivision development
The use of an Extraordinary Assumption might have affected the assignment results
Intended Use of Report
To assist in documenting value for internal decision making.
Intended User of Report
Tricia Masih-Das and her representatives and/or assigns. Any other entity is considered an
unintended user who may not rely upon this appraisal without the written consent of the appraiser.
Competency of Appraisers
The appraisers specific qualifications are included within this report. These qualifications serve as
evidence of their competence for the completion of this appraisal assignment in compliance with the
competency provision contained within the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice,
as promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation.
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 11
The appraisers' knowledge and experience, combined with their professional qualifications, are
commensurate with the complexity of this assignment, based on the following:
# Professional experience
# Educational background and training
# Business, professional, academic affiliations and activities
The appraisers have previously provided consultation and value estimates for all types of vacant
land, office, industrial, retail-commercial, sellout-properties (subdivisions and condominiums) and
all types of residential properties throughout central Florida.
Scope of Appraisal
The scope of this appraisal assignment involved the completion of several steps performed within
the guidelines of commonly accepted appraisal procedures. These include a thorough inspection of
the subject and surrounding neighborhoods; gathering comparable sales and other useful market data;
formulating opinions and judgments based on this data, including supply and demand factors and
specific property information, such as highest and best use; and, finally, analyzing the data to form
sound valuation judgments based on the appropriate valuation methods.
Interest Appraised
See “Summary of Appraisal”.
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 12
DEFINITIONS
Market Value
Source: Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines; December 10, 2010, Federal Register,
Volume 75 Number 237, Page 77472.
Market Value—As defined in the Agencies’ appraisal regulations, the most probable price which
a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale,
the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected
by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition are the consummation of a sale as of a specified date
and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:
• Buyer and seller are typically motivated; • Both parties are well informed or well advised, and
acting in what they consider their own best interests; • A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in
the open market; • Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial
arrangements comparable thereto; and • The price represents the normal consideration for the
property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone
associated with the sale.
Highest and Best Use
Highest and best use may be defined as: the reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an
improved property that is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that
results in the highest value. Implied in these definitions is that the determination of highest and best
use takes into account the contribution of a specific use to the community and community
development goals as well as the benefits of that use to individual property owners. Hence, in
certain situations the highest and best use of land may be for parks, greenbelts, preservation,
conservation, wildlife habitats, and the like.
Fee Simple Interest
Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate; subject only to the limitations of
eminent domain, escheat, police power, and taxation.
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 13
Leased Fee
A property held in fee with the right of use and occupancy conveyed by lease to others. A property
consisting of the right to receive ground rentals over a period of time, plus the right of ultimate
repossession at the termination of the lease.
This space intentionally left blank
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 14
Extraordinary Assumptions / Special Assumptions, Full Discussion
Appraisal Institute, Common Errors and Issues, April 15, 2015
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 15
Extraordinary Assumptions / Special Assumptions
Appraisal Institute, Common Errors and Issues, April 15, 2015
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 16
Hypothetical Conditions, Full Discussion
Appraisal Institute, Common Errors and Issues, April 15, 2015
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 17
DATA PRESENTATION
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 18
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS
Front view of 8661 A D Mims Road
8667 A D Mims Road
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 19
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS 3 & 4
Abutting subdivision to the east
Abutting subdivision to the west
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 20
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS 5 & 6
Looking east along A D Mims Road Right
Looking west along A D Mims Road
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 21
Neighborhood Map
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 22
NEIGHBORHOOD DATA
The boundaries of the neighborhood are:
North Clarcona Ocoee Road
South Silver Star Rd (SR 438)
East N Hiawassee Rd
West Apopka Vineland Rd (SR 535)
The established neighborhood is approximately (10) miles northwest of downtown Orlando and was
developed as a residential area in the 1960's. Many of the residential lots are approximately 5 acres
in size.
A D Mims Road is a two-lane neighborhood collector through the neighborhood and has a signalized
intersection at Clark Road just west. Numerous 5 acre lots are in the former rural location.
Silver Star Road (SR 438) is a major east-west thoroughfare that extends westward from Orange
Blossom Trail (U.S. Highway 441) to Winter Garden. Two major neighborhood shopping centers
are at the intersection of Silver Star Road and N Hiawassee Road.
Clark Road is a major north-south material through the abutting city of Ocoee and has a signalized
intersection at Silver Star Road. Numerous national retailers such as Walgreens, CVS and Publix
are at this intersection.
West Colonial Drive (SR 50) runs parallel to SilverStar Road and is a also major east-west arterial
through the center of Orlando and extends from coast-to-coast.
N Hiawassee Road is a major north-south thoroughfare through west Orange County.
Apopka Vineland Rd is a secondary north-south arterial through west Orange County and has a
signalized intersection at Silver Star Road.
Conclusion
The neighborhood is in a desirable west Orange County location and values of properties in good
locations, such as the subject, are expected to remain stable into the foreseeable future.
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 23
SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA
Legal Description (from deed)
Please see Addenda for legal descriptions from Tax Cards.
Three (3) Year History
8661 A D Mims Road, Tax Map on Next Page
Owner of Record Date last Transaction Price Paid Size (SF) PSF
Janet J Masi-Das Moore Aug 1979 $25,000 --
OR Book & Page 03043 1047 -- -- --
Pending Transactions
Under Contract To Contract Date Price Size (SF) PSF
NA - - - - -
Listing Information
Listed with Date Price Size (SF) PSF
Empire Network Realty 2017 $1,295,000 Includes 8667
8667 A D Mims Road
Owner of Record Date last Transaction Price Paid Size (SF) PSF
Basmaty Masi-Das Aug 1979 $25,000 -- --
OR Book & Page 03043 1046 -- -- --
Pending Transactions
Under Contract To Contract Date Price Size (SF) PSF
NA - - - - -
Listing Information
Listed with Date Price Size (SF) PSF
Empire Realty 2017 $1,295,000 433,026 $2.99
Includes two abutting parcels, 8661 and 8667 A D Mims Road analyzed as land only
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 24
Tax Map
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 25
SITE DATA
Tax Map, Aerial
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 26
Access
Both parcels have direct access to A D Mims Road.
Soil and Subsoil
We have no reason to believe that any contamination exists. However, if the subject is found to be
contaminated, we reserve the right to alter our opinion of market value. Please see the Letter of
Transmittal for a standard disclaimer.
Flood Hazard Statement
See “Summary of Appraisal” for flood hazard information.
Easements & Encumbrances
We were not made aware of any adverse easements or encumbrances which would restrict the
development capabilities of the subject parcel in any unusual manner.
Street Improvements
A D Mims Road is a two-lane neighborhood collector.
Utilities and Services
All required public utilities are available.
Impact Fees:
Orange County and it’s municipalities (where applicable) charges impact fees for transportation, and
water. These fees are charged at the time building permits are issued and are an attempt by local
governments to tie the cost of additional infrastructure (roads, etc.) to new development. The fees are
charged on the proposed use based on the estimated burden the use will place on existing
infrastructure.
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 27
HIGHEST AND BEST USE ESTIMATE
In order to estimate the highest and best use of the subject, we considered those uses which are
physically possible, legally permissible and economically feasible. The highest and best use of land
is defined as that use which is reasonably probable and which will result in the highest return to the
land. Consideration must be given to the individual features of the land, such as size, shape, location,
access to roadways and the availability and demand for the property in the current real estate market.
In addition, the legal uses permitted under zoning regulations were analyzed.
Highest and Best Use - as Vacant
Legally Permissible
Single family residential subdivisions abut each side of the assembled two-parcel subject. For this
reason, we believe the subject can be developed into a single family residential subdivision. A site
plan from a Florida licensed Civil Engineering firm must be submitted to Orange County Planning to
seek approval.
Physically Possible
As assembled, the subject has a desirable shape and size and is physically similar to existing
subdivisions which abut it on each side. Therefore, the subject appears to have the physical features
required for successful development.
Financially Feasible & Maximally Productive
Development into a single family residential subdivision is one of the highest and best uses.
Comments
Reasonable Marketing Period Similar properties typically sell within twelve (12) months
Typical Participant Home builders and/or church owner-users
Forecasted Changes Neighborhood continues to improve due to area improvements
Real Estate Commissions Between 6% and 8%
Existing Supply & Demand In Balance
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 28
Exposure Time
An exposure time of (12) months is reasonable, defensible and appropriate.
Exposure time is not intended to be a prediction of a date of sale or an one-line statement. Instead, it
is an integral part of the appraisal analysis and is based on one or more of the following:
- statistical information about the days on the market
- information gathered through sales verification
- interviews of market participants
(Paraphrased from USPAP)
The reasonable exposure period is a function of price, time and use. It is not an isolated estimate of
time along. Exposure time is different for various types of real estate and under various market
conditions. Exposure time is the estimated length of time the property would have been offered prior
to a hypothetical market value sale on the effective date of appraisal.
Marketing Time
We have estimated a marketing time of (12) months.
USPAP states “The reasonable marketing time is an opinion of the amount of time it might take to sell
a real or personal property interest at the concluded market value level during the period immediately
after the effective date of an appraisal”.
Based on statistical information about days on market, information gathered through sales verification,
interviews of market participants and anticipated changes in market conditions.
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 29
APPRAISAL PROCESS
There are three traditional approaches normally used by appraisers in the estimation of market value.
These three approaches analyze data from three market perspectives and are the Cost Approach, the
Income Approach and the Sales Comparison Approach.
The Cost Approach is the sum of the land value and the cost new of the improvements less accrued
depreciation. The Cost Approach is based on the premise that an informed, rational investor/purchaser
would pay no more for an existing property than it would cost him to replace a substitute property with
the same utility without undue delay.
The Sales Comparison Approach is the process for comparing prices paid for properties having a
satisfactory degree of similarity to the subject, adjusted for differences in time, location and physical
characteristics. This approach is based upon the principle of substitution, which implies that a prudent
purchaser will not pay more to buy a property than it would cost him to buy a comparable substitute
property in a similar location.
The Income Approach is based on the premise that a prudent investor would pay no more for the
subject than he would for another investment with similar risk and return characteristics. Since the
value of an investment can be considered equal to the present worth of anticipated future benefits in
the form of dollar income or amenities, this approach estimates the present value of the net income that
the property is capable of producing. This amount is capitalized at a rate which reflects risk to the
investor and the amount of income necessary to support debt service.
Each technique or approach to value has its strengths and weaknesses, depending to a large extent on
the type of property being appraised and the quality of available data. In most instances, one of the
approaches will produce a more reliable value indication than the other approaches.
When sufficient Comparable Sales are available, land is typically appraised using only the Sales
Comparison Approach as was the case here.
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 30
SALES COMPARISON APPROACH
The Sales Comparison Approach to value is the basis by which properties are compared, one to the
other, by some comparable measure.
Methodology
In estimating the market value of the subject, we utilized sales of similar properties that have recently
sold. An exhaustive search produced the following sales.
Please see Sales in the addenda.
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 31
Subject Listing
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 32
Comparable Sales Summary - Please see addenda for Comparable Sales
Subject Sale 1 Sale 2 Sale 3
Location W Orange Co Sanford Oviedo Oviedo
Fronts on AD Mims Rd N Oregon St Storybook Ln Aloma Avenue
Nearest Main Cross Clark Road Orange Blvd Chapman Road Highway 417
Use Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision
Buyer Available MI Homes Pulte Homes Beazer Homes
County Orange Seminole Seminole Orange
Zoning A-1 PD A-1 PD
Sale Date Listing Dec 2016 Feb 2017 Aug 2017
Price Paid $1,295,000 $1,470,000 $1,400,000 $1,300,000
Financing Cash Equivalent Cash Equivalent Cash Equivalent Cash Equivalent
Sale Conditions Normal Normal Normal Normal
Adjustment 0% 0% 0% 0%
Adjusted Price Paid $1,295,000 $1,470,000 $1,400,000 $1,300,000
Time $0 0% 0% 0%
Time Adjusted Price $1,295,000 $1,470,000 $1,400,000 $1,300,000
Site Size (SF) 433,026 435,600 410,771 445,183
Site Size (AC) 9.94 10.00 9.43 10.22
Price PSF $2.99 $3.37 $3.41 $2.92
Adjustments
Size - 0% 0% 0%
Location - 0% 0% 0%
Topography - 0% 0% 0%
Miscellaneous 0% 0% 0%
Net Adjustment - 0% 0% 0%
Land Value PSF - $3.37 $3.41 $2.92
Conclusion
Item Size (SF) PSF Value
Land As Vacant 433,026 $3.00 $1,299,078
Less: Estimated Demolition Cost ($15,000)
Sub-Total $1,284,078
Market Value “As Is” 433,026 $2.97 $1,285,000
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 33
Financing: Sometimes sellers will finance or “hold paper” on a property at a non-market
interest rate and at non-market loan-to-value ratios. Appraisers must consider the
affect on the price paid and calculate a “Cash Equivalent” price paid.
Sale Conditions: Properties are sometimes sold under duress and this condition must be considered
since it usually has a negative affect on the price paid. This condition can be
difficult to quantify and appraisers often don’t rely on sale transactions that took
place under duress. Part of the definition of “Market Value” is that the sale
occurred under typical or normal sale conditions.
Time: The market has since been stable over the time period of the sales.
Size: Larger sites usually sell for less than smaller sites on a per unit basis, all other
things being equal and we made adjustments as deemed appropriate.
Location: Comparable sales with superior locational characteristics when compared to the
subject were adjusted down and sales with inferior locations, when compared to
the subject were adjusted up.
Topography: The subject soils appear suitable for subdivision development.
Miscellaneous: None noted
Market Value (Land)
We concluded on a land value as shown on the previous “Summary” page.
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 34
ADDENDA
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 35
QUALIFICATIONS OF DANIEL PEELE, ASA
EDUCATION
Graduated from Florida International University (FIU) in Miami, Real Estate Major
State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ 887
State Licensed Real Estate Broker-Associate BK 166385
EXPERIENCE
Commercial Real Estate Appraiser with Pardue, Heid, Church, Smith & Waller, 1984 - 1994
President of Central Florida Appraisal Consultants (CFAC) since 1994
Over 30 years of full-time commercial real estate appraisal experience in Central Florida
Commercial RE Broker-Associate with Charles Rutenberg Realty
APPRAISAL EDUCATION
BA Degree (Real Estate Major) Florida International University (FIU) in Miami (State College)
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
ASA, American Society of Appraisers, (Designated Member) ASA Designation
CAI, Community Associations Institute, (Business Member)
ORRA, Greater Orlando Area Board of Realtors, Realtor Member (we have MLS)
PREPARED APPRAISALS FOR
Commercial Banks, Private Lenders, Lawyers, Buyers and Sellers, Insurance Companies
PROPERTIES APPRAISED
Commercial (all types) Insurable Value for Insurance Office Buildings (all types)
Special Use Properties Sellout type Properties Subdivisions (all types)
Hotels and Motels Industrial (All types) Residential (all types)
Self Storage Facilities Retail (all types) Vacant land (all types)
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 36
Certified General Appraiser License RZ 887
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 37
Tax Card -8661 A D Mims Road
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 38
Tax Card - 8667 A D Mims Road
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 39
Flood Map
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 40
FEMA Flood Definitions
A D Mims Road, Orlando, FL 32818 File # 17-325
Central Florida Appraisal Consultants Page 41
FEMA Flood Definitions - Page 2
������������� ��������������������������� ����������������� ������������ ����� !"#""�$%�&'()�*�+,-.)�/0.�012)�1(�!34!543"!6�718�9!:;<":"""�=9!;<:"""#""4$%> ?2)@�ABC.D��E���FG�����&'()�$8.'D�HIHH�JKI&1L�MN'C.DO�������P1(,(@DQR$STD�UV�WV�HV�JXVH�HHVHH�J���UV�WV�HV�JXVH�HHVHH�H�����R� ���� �M'2.�Y'L.D��Z��Z�H�U[.\18).)�Y'L.D��Z�HZ�H�UM'2.�S8,\.D]��̂�H�HHHIHH�_̀�������aS8,\.4$\8.D]�̂��HHHIHH$0b,(@�S8,\.DV�V&1'(�$c1d(LDV�VY1e(�S'Bc.(LDV�V&.().8DV�V�
� �M'2.�ABC.DO�f�G ��� g�h\\dC,.)DV�VY'B0�h(�+'8b.LDV�VY..)�Y'L.DV�VM'2.�S8,\.�M1d8\.D�i���A8'(07.8�A'-D]�H��WHIHH%1(),L,1(0D��� �A1L'2�$00.00.)�j'2d.D]�U��HHHIHH$00.00.)�j'2d.�kcCDV�V$00.00.)�A'-�l.'8D�H�U� � �A1L'2�$CC8',0.)�j'2d.D]�U��HHHIHH$CC8',0.)�j'2d.�kcCDV�V$CC8',0.)�j'2d.�&'()DV�V�X�����m�������� �[.\18).)�?dB.8��ZO�n��G�������������A8d.�?dB.8��ZO�n��G� ;""�k(L.8('L,1('2�SbeB� &'b.�+'8B:�o&�p3<;6%1(L'\LR�f���X����GSN1(._̂H�a����V��HH?dB.8�ABC.Q��f� ��O�f�G �?dB.8�?81b.8� �������
� �[.\18).)�M.22.8��qR�� �� ���G����A8d.�M.22.8��r��G sr���q�R�i� r� !53"�tN,L0L'u2.�%L� &'b.�+'8B:�o&�p3<;6%1(L'\L� �������SN1(.� �������M.22.8�ABC.� �������&,0L,(@�?81b.8� ������������ GA8'(0'\L,1( �ZO�n��G��������������_�ZO�n��G�a��Kv���������HV�K��� ��K ����������R�K�� ��������H�U������qR�� �� ���G����_�r��G sr���q�R�i� raI�wr��G����s��K��i�G�K��K��� ������� r�� ���G���� �E��KK����� � r������I�wr��s�s�� ���G��K� ���� ������������ �����������I�J�����x��� ��i� r��ZO�n��G�f�������� r��G������ ���G����s��K������� r� � r�������i���� ���G�����G������������r��GI�S81C.8LB AN.�C81C.8LB�,0�'�!"�'\8.�y'\'(L�2'()�21\'L.)�,(�LN.�Mz�{d')8'(L�17�h8'(@.�?2y)�'()�T�h8.@1(�ML#��� �����������Jss���G�����G�� �� Gk(718c'L,1(�1uL',(.)�781c�01d8\.0�)..c.)�8.2,'u2.#�tN,2.�\1(0,).8.)�'\\d8'L.:�e.�c'b.�(1�@d'8'(L..:�e'88'(LB�18�8.C8.0.(L'L,1(# �Y'L.D���ZH�Z�H�� |}~����������
����������� ������������������������������������ ��������� !"��#�$����%&'�(()���"��*���+� ��,���"��*�-�� �,�����*���.� !"����+���� /012�34�5678�9�:;<=>�?@A8�@7�BCDBEDCBFE�G@>�HFI1BBIBBB�JHF1KI1LC02MD34N OA8P�QRS=T:;<=>5678�3>=6T��������5@;�U<6S=T�� ��V+*�W@7X7PT��Y3Z[T�Y��Y��Y��))�)Y)$�))))��*�\ �"*� �U6A=�]6;=T)�.)%.�)Y%=̂_@>8=8�]6;=T)�.)(.�)Y%U6A=�Z>X_=T̀Y#�))#)))�))�ab"�"�cZ>X_=D3_>=T̀Y�(#�&���'3?dX7P�Z>X_=T���5@67�3e@f7;T���]@g7�Z6Re=7;T���5=78=>T����
� �U6A=�QRS=Th�!� �� i�:__fSX=8T���]6R?�:7�j6>d=;T���]==8�]6;=T���U6A=�Z>X_=�U@f>_=T k�Q>67?G=>�Q6lT̀�#())�))4@78X;X@7?T��� �Q@;6A�3??=??=8�m6Af=T̀&(#��)�))3??=??=8�m6Af=�neST���3??=??=8�Q6l�o=6>T�)Y&� � �Q@;6A�3SS>6X?=8�m6Af=T̀�%(#))(�))3SS>6X?=8�m6Af=�neST̀&&#(Y(�))3SS>6X?=8�m6Af=�5678T̀�YY#Y�)�))�p+��q��**� �=̂_@>8=8�OfR=>�r+* �s��������������Q>f=�OfR=>�r+* �s���� 1/BF�mX7=A678�̂8� :>A678@I�t5�2CKFF4@7;6_;�*"� �p�**Z<@7=a�)%c�&&Y�Y��YOfR=>�QRS=\!*��OfR=>�O>@d=>�� �����"*
� �=̂_@>8=8�U=AA=>��+ �V�$����h��Q>f=�U=AA=>�p������$���� FBBF�U;@>Ru@@d�57� :vX=8@I�t5�2CELM4@7;6_;rVV��� !��Z<@7=a�)%c�'�(��Y('U=AA=>�QRS=�� �����"*5X?;X7P�O>@d=>�� �����"*����� �Q>67?6_;X@7 r+* �s���������������ar+* �s���c���w+"������������ �� ����*����"���!��k" ��������.����� � �*"�V�%#)()��$���$�+���)%#��)Y%������+ �V�$����h���ap������$���c����̀Y#�))#)))��x����*��"��k�����*�+*� ������ �� ����� �y�����"�V� �� ������x����� ��"��*��� ����� ������������������������������ ���������#�"�� !"�����*"� �p�**�k" �r+* �s����!"�"�� ����*��� #���*��"�#����� �� � ��*����k"**���+�������"�V*����"*���"�� "�*��Z>@S=>;R Q<=�S>@S=>;R�X?�6�/01296_>=�;>6_;�@G�A678�XeS>@v=8�gX;<�C�u6>7?D?<=8?�A@_6;=8�@7�;<=�[z�_@>7=>�@G�{�4<6Se67�̂8�678�U;@>Ru@@d�570�� �*�$*�"�������"��*�����+* �� �n7G@>e6;X@7�@u;6X7=8�G>@e�?@f>_=?�8==e=8�>=AX6uA=0�{<XA=�_@7?X8=>=8�6__f>6;=I�g=�e6d=�7@�Pf6>67;==I�g6>>67;R�@>�>=S>=?=7;6;X@70 �]6;=T�YY.)Y.�)Y% |}~����������
������������� ������������������������������ ���� ��������������������� ��� !�"#����$%���� ��& '�(��)����� ��*�+(�)�&����,��-� ��� ��',��+(./011�23�4567�8�9:;<=�>?@7�?6�/AB1CB1/.A�D?=�E.FG//F///�HE.1AF1/.0IJB23K L@7M�NOP<Q9:;<=4567�2=<5Q���������4?:�R;5P<QS�(���'��T?6U6MQVW2XYQ���������%������������!��$�������������$����������W(���� �R5@<�Z5:<Q��-�[-����\<]?=7<7�Z5:<Q�[-��-����R5@<�X=U]<Q̂�!���!�������_V',����S� �̀X=U]<B2]=<Q̂���!����%$2>aU6M�X=U]<Q���4?56�2b?c6:Q���Z?d6�X5Ob<6:Q���4<67<=Q����
� �R5@<�NOP<Qe���(��(f�9]]cPU<7Q���Z5O>�96�g5=a<:Q���Z<<7�Z5:<Q���R5@<�X=U]<�R?c=]<QS� �-����� N=56>D<=�N5hQ̂i!������3?67U:U?6>Q��� �N?:5@�2>><>><7�j5@c<Q̂�!��$!������2>><>><7�j5@c<�kbPQ���2>><>><7�N5h�l<5=Q����� � �N?:5@�2PP=5U><7�j5@c<Q̂�!$��!�%[���2PP=5U><7�j5@c<�kbPQ̂�$i!������2PP=5U><7�j5@c<�4567Q̂�!�%�!$������m'��n����� �\<]?=7<7�LcO<=�m�o�� ���##&N=c<�LcO<=�m�o�� ��� 1J//�g5U:@567�3<6:<=�Xpql� g5U:@567F�r4�G1AI.3?6:5]:s (� �����X;?6<_���̀���i�����LcO<=�NOP<V���(�e���( LcO<=�L=?a<=s (� �����
� �\<]?=7<7�R<@@<=�&�n�#�#����t 'u�##&N=c<�R<@@<=�&�n�#�#����t 'u�##&� 1Jvw�R:56b?=<�3:� 9=@567?F�r4�G1C.A3?6:5]:W'�(���#'���X;?6<s (� �����R<@@<=�NOP<s (� �����4U>:U6M�L=?a<=s (� �����& ���(�N=56>5]:U?6 m�o�� ���##&���x'��������������(��(� ���������u �����(���!��i��"��������������� �� ��y'����[!������� ��&�n�##����t 'u�##&�� �̂�!���!�����z������u�����������'��(��� ��(��(�����(�{���� �����( �(������z��u u(����� ��(�����(�����x'����(� ���� ���������������������!���� ��� ��X=?P<=:O N;<�P=?P<=:O�5�./01185]=<�:=5]:�?D�@567�UbP=?|<7�dU:;�>U6M@<�D5bU@O�;?b<�@?]5:<7�U6�:;<�Rq�}c57=56:�?D�2@?b5�2|<�567�~UM;d5O�v.A0&�(���"� �����uu������& ��'�(��(�k6D?=b5:U?6�?�:5U6<7�D=?b�>?c=]<>�7<<b<7�=<@U5�@<0�q;U@<�]?6>U7<=<7�5]]c=5:<F�d<�b5a<�6?�Mc5=56:<<F�d5==56:O�?=�=<P=<><6:5:U?60 �Z5:<Q���-��-���� �������������
��������
����� � ���������� � ���������������������� �!" !# $��%&�'(�)*++, ,�-��$�.�/0#12# �3%�# %�!"��45��6�( �78�%�&�'(�)*+9�:��;* *!.��$�<=�2#�<7��# %�>8�0?#4�@,+ �78�%�&�'(�)*+9� )
A $��2#"8� ��5"#8 �%�$��2�B�C�D�B�%��2�%���=8#5=�E�.08=��D� B8%���%�#DDC�#"�&�?��2#6�� ���C#�# "��&�?#��# "4������1��B� "#"8� E � FGHI�J�KL�M��
Top Related