Download - Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Transcript
Page 1: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

“Edit This Page”The Socio-technological Infrastructure of a Wikipedia ArticleShaun SlatteryDePaul [email protected]

ACM SIGDOCOctober 7, 2009Bloomington, IN

Page 2: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Networked fact-building

increasing use of, need for networked environments for collaborative authorship

corporate teamwork, fan sites, scientific research

challenges of designing such environments…

socio-technological factors to consider

Page 3: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Activity system of a W’pedia article

mediating artifacts: wiki environment, sources

object: clean coal technologies article

outcome:

Wikipedia project

subject: “clean coal technologies” article authors

division of labor: editors, administrators, stewards

community: Wikipedia authors

rules: Wikipedia policy and informal conventions

Page 4: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Activity system of a W’pedia article

mediating artifacts: wiki environment, sources

object: clean coal technologies article

outcome:

Wikipedia project

subject: “clean coal technologies” article authors

division of labor: editors, administrators, stewards

community: Wikipedia authors

rules: Wikipedia policy and informal conventions

socio-technological

Page 5: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Socio-technological infrastructure Community: strong sense

of community, dedicated Division of Labor: formal

roles, interest/expertise Rules: official policy,

unofficial practices

Page 6: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Socio-technological infrastructureFunctionality mediates fact-building Article

Page 7: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Socio-technological infrastructureFunctionality mediates fact-building Article

functionality: “fixed” text, though sources noted

Page 8: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Socio-technological infrastructureFunctionality mediates fact-building Edit this page

Page 9: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Socio-technological infrastructureFunctionality mediates fact-building Edit this page

functionality: text features, link/embed, hidden comment, block quote, reference

Page 10: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Socio-technological infrastructureFunctionality mediates fact-building History

Page 11: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Socio-technological infrastructureFunctionality mediates fact-building History

functionality: compare/search, revision statistics, undo, timestamp, userID, talk, notes

Page 12: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Socio-technological infrastructureFunctionality mediates fact-building Discussion/Talk pages

Page 13: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Socio-technological infrastructureFunctionality mediates fact-building Discussion/Talk pages

functionalities: edit, history, watch, purge

Page 14: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Socio-technological infrastructureFunctionality mediates fact-building User functionalities,

– “watch”– “profile”

Page 15: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Fact-building and infrastructure Much fact-building activity is

primarily mediated by mere writing, standard web technologies

Challenges lie in creating community, rules, labor-division

Biggest challenge in motivation toward goal

What can/should we design and how?

Page 16: Analysis of Wikipedia Editing (socio-technological infrastructure)

Swarts

Shaun SlatteryDePaul [email protected]://condor.depaul.edu/~sslatte1/