Y O U R R E P O R T S E X P L A I N E D
PASS2
TRACE162998
To
Tue, Apr 26, 2016Sampled
A Smith By
For
Tue, Apr 26, 2016 Received
Analyzed
Tue, May 3, 2016 Reported
80000Customer 98-00149 ReportMr. John SmithXYZ Food Company123 AvenueAnytown, USA 12345
Limiting Characteristic
Particles
Pressure Dew Point, °CWater
OilOil Aerosol, mg/m 3
Oil Vapor, mg/m 3
Total Oil, mg/m 3
Maximum Number of Particlesper Cubic Meter (m3)as aFunction of Particles Size, d,in micrometers ( m)
By Mass Concentration (CP), mg/m3
0.5 < d 1.0 m1.0 < d 5.0 m
d 5.0 m
±22±22
±22±22±4.3
0.1 < d 0.5 m
(E) For samples at line pressure. Please advise if sample was taken at the dryer outlet; that limit is 10°C below the lowest temperature.(G) If lowest temperature and line pressure are not cited on the Data Sheet, values of 0°C and 50 psig are used for calculations.(L) Results for oil components in ppmw, if included, appear within brackets.
Richard A. Smith, Laboratory Directorwww.AirCheckLab.com We Do One Thing –Test Compressed Air
Results relate only to items tested.This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written permission of Trace Analytics, LLC
© Copyright 9/23/2016, Trace Analytics, LLCAccredited Since 1991 By American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
Certificate No. 322.01 Accredited In The Chemical Field of Testing
ResultsNotes
SpecificationNotes
AirCheck Report™15768 Hamilton Pool RoadAustin, Texas 78738800-AIR-1024 or 512-263-0000 • Fax: 512-263-0002E-mail: [email protected]
Line 5Desiccant Dryer
SamplingPoint
Identification
LaboratoryNotes
n/a = not applicable n/d = not determined n/p = not provided n/s = not specified None (or 0) indicates <LOQ Tr = Trace, >LOD & <LOQ(1) At the 95% confidence interval as a percent of the specification limit includes sampling and analytical estimates of uncertainty.(2) Gases named in ISO 8573-6 Table 2 and/or other measurands required by the specification or customer.
Estimate ofUncertainty,
% (1)Pass / FailPurity
Class (B)
Purchase Order No.
Wed, Apr 27, 2016
0.007
SampleResults
435063
None
(A)
SpecificationLimit
None
Other (2)
Page 1 of 2 - Analytical Results
Results vs ISA 7.0.01:1996 and ISO 8573-1:2010 (M)
0.01
400,0006,000100
-40-480.0020.0030.005
PASS ±30±4.6±6.3
PASS ±11
2
1
ACCREDITED
Ex. PRO PACKAGE[ 1-5: 1-6: 1-4]You will choose your purity class based on needsReports will indicate Pass/Fail
Results vs ISO 8573-1:2010 [2:2:1]
Example[2:2:1][P:W:O]
PASS2
TRACE162998
To
Tue, Apr 26, 2016Sampled
A Smith By
For
Tue, Apr 26, 2016 Received
Analyzed
Tue, May 3, 2016 Reported
80000Customer 98-00149 ReportMr. John SmithXYZ Food Company123 AvenueAnytown, USA 12345
Limiting Characteristic
Particles
Pressure Dew Point, °CWater
OilOil Aerosol, mg/m [ppmw]3
Oil Vapor, mg/m [ppmw]3
Total Oil, mg/m [ppmw]3
Maximum Number of Particlesper Cubic Meter (m3)as aFunction of Particles Size, d,in micrometers ( m)
By Mass Concentration (CP), mg/m3
0.5 < d 1.0 m1.0 < d 5.0 m
d 5.0 m
±22±22
±22±22±4.3
0.1 < d 0.5 m
AirCheck Report™15768 Hamilton Pool RoadAustin, Texas 78738800-AIR-1024 or 512-263-0000 • Fax: 512-263-0002E-mail: [email protected]
Line 5Desiccant Dryer
SamplingPoint
Identification
Estimate ofUncertainty,
% (1)Pass / Fail
Class (B)as applicableand/or Note
Purchase Order No.
Wed, Apr 27, 2016
0.007
SampleConcentration
435063
None
(A)
SpecificationLimit
None
Other (2)
Page 1 of 2 - Analytical Results
Results vs ISA 7.0.01:1996 and ISO 8573-1:2010 (M)
SampleConcentration
0.01
400,0006,000100
-40-480.0020.0030.005
PASS ±30±4.6±6.3
PASS ±11
2
1
cont
amina
nts
gase
s
Results vs ISO 8573-1:2010 [2:2:1] PRO
1
TRACE162998
Limiting Characteristic
Particles
n/a
Pressure Dew Point, °CWater
OilOil Aerosol, mg/m3
Oil Vapor, mg/m3
Total Oil, mg/m3
Maximum Number of Particlesper Cubic Meter (m3)as aFunction of Particles Size, d,in micrometers (µm)
By Mass Concentration (CP), mg/m3
0.5 < d ≤ 1.0 µm1.0 < d ≤ 5.0 µm
±22±22
0.007 ±4.3<-48 ≤-40 ±30
<0.002 ±4.6<0.003 ±6.3<0.005 ≤0.01 ±11
2
1
0.1 < d ≤ 0.5 µm
SamplingPoint
Identification
SpecificationLimit
Estimate ofUncertainty,
% (1)
SampleResults
Pass / FailPurityClass (B)
≤20,000327 ≤400<8 ≤10
(A)
d > 5.0 µm ±22None None
Other (2)
Results vs ISO 8573-1:2010
™Aircheck Report
Ex. DIAGNOSTICPACKAGE[ 1-5: 1-6: 1-4]Reports will not indicate Pass/Fail
[email protected] 800.247.1024 x4
DIAGNOSTICREPORT
PROREPORT
cont
amina
nts
gase
s & ot
her
lab an
alyse
s
NO P
ASS/
FAIL
DESI
GNAT
ION
Your Results
Your Specifications
Y O U R R E P O R T S E X P L A I N E D
PASS2
TRACE162998
To
Tue, Apr 26, 2016Sampled
A Smith By
For
Tue, Apr 26, 2016 Received
Analyzed
Tue, May 3, 2016 Reported
80000Customer 98-00149 ReportMr. John SmithXYZ Food Company123 AvenueAnytown, USA 12345
Limiting Characteristic
Particles
Pressure Dew Point, °CWater
OilOil Aerosol, mg/m 3
Oil Vapor, mg/m 3
Total Oil, mg/m 3
Maximum Number of Particlesper Cubic Meter (m3)as aFunction of Particles Size, d,in micrometers ( m)
By Mass Concentration (CP), mg/m3
0.5 < d 1.0 m1.0 < d 5.0 m
d 5.0 m
±22±22
±22±22±4.3
0.1 < d 0.5 m
(E) For samples at line pressure. Please advise if sample was taken at the dryer outlet; that limit is 10°C below the lowest temperature.(G) If lowest temperature and line pressure are not cited on the Data Sheet, values of 0°C and 50 psig are used for calculations.(L) Results for oil components in ppmw, if included, appear within brackets.
Richard A. Smith, Laboratory Directorwww.AirCheckLab.com We Do One Thing –Test Compressed Air
Results relate only to items tested.This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written permission of Trace Analytics, LLC
© Copyright 9/23/2016, Trace Analytics, LLCAccredited Since 1991 By American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
Certificate No. 322.01 Accredited In The Chemical Field of Testing
ResultsNotes
SpecificationNotes
AirCheck Report™15768 Hamilton Pool RoadAustin, Texas 78738800-AIR-1024 or 512-263-0000 • Fax: 512-263-0002E-mail: [email protected]
Line 5Desiccant Dryer
SamplingPoint
Identification
LaboratoryNotes
n/a = not applicable n/d = not determined n/p = not provided n/s = not specified None (or 0) indicates <LOQ Tr = Trace, >LOD & <LOQ(1) At the 95% confidence interval as a percent of the specification limit includes sampling and analytical estimates of uncertainty.(2) Gases named in ISO 8573-6 Table 2 and/or other measurands required by the specification or customer.
Pass / FailPurity
Class (B)
Purchase Order No.
Wed, Apr 27, 2016
0.007
SampleResults
435063
None
(A)
SpecificationLimit
None
Other (2)
Page 1 of 2 - Analytical Results
Results vs ISA 7.0.01:1996 and ISO 8573-1:2010 (M)
0.01
400,0006,000100
-40-480.0020.0030.005
PASS ±30±4.6±6.3
PASS ±11
2
1
ACCREDITED
For details please see Laboratory Notes Here
Estimate ofUncertainty,
% (1)
Results vs ISO 8573-1:2010 [2:2:1]
PASS2
TRACE162998
To
Tue, Apr 26, 2016Sampled
A Smith By
For
Tue, Apr 26, 2016 Received
Analyzed
Tue, May 3, 2016 Reported
80000Customer 98-00149 ReportMr. John SmithXYZ Food Company123 AvenueAnytown, USA 12345
Limiting Characteristic
Particles
Pressure Dew Point, °CWater
OilOil Aerosol, mg/m [ppmw]3
Oil Vapor, mg/m [ppmw]3
Total Oil, mg/m [ppmw]3
Maximum Number of Particlesper Cubic Meter (m3)as aFunction of Particles Size, d,in micrometers ( m)
By Mass Concentration (CP), mg/m3
0.5 < d 1.0 m1.0 < d 5.0 m
d 5.0 m
±22±22
±22±22±4.3
0.1 < d 0.5 m
AirCheck Report™15768 Hamilton Pool RoadAustin, Texas 78738800-AIR-1024 or 512-263-0000 • Fax: 512-263-0002E-mail: [email protected]
Line 5Desiccant Dryer
SamplingPoint
Identification
Estimate ofUncertainty,
% (1)Pass / Fail
Class (B)as applicableand/or Note
Purchase Order No.
Wed, Apr 27, 2016
0.007
SampleConcentration
435063
None
(A)
SpecificationLimit
None
Other (2)
Page 1 of 2 - Analytical Results
Results vs ISA 7.0.01:1996 and ISO 8573-1:2010 (M)
SampleConcentration
0.01
400,0006,000100
-40-480.0020.0030.005
PASS ±30±4.6±6.3
PASS ±11
2
1
cont
amina
nts
gase
s
Results vs ISO 8573-1:2010 [2:2:1] PRO
1
TRACE162998
Limiting Characteristic
Particles
n/a
Pressure Dew Point, °CWater
OilOil Aerosol, mg/m3
Oil Vapor, mg/m3
Total Oil, mg/m3
Maximum Number of Particlesper Cubic Meter (m3)as aFunction of Particles Size, d,in micrometers (µm)
By Mass Concentration (CP), mg/m3
0.5 < d ≤ 1.0 µm1.0 < d ≤ 5.0 µm
±22±22
0.007 ±4.3<-48 ≤-40 ±30
<0.002 ±4.6<0.003 ±6.3<0.005 ≤0.01 ±11
2
1
0.1 < d ≤ 0.5 µm
SamplingPoint
Identification
SpecificationLimit
Estimate ofUncertainty,
% (1)
SampleResults
Pass / FailPurityClass (B)
≤20,000327 ≤400<8 ≤10
(A)
d > 5.0 µm ±22None None
Other (2)
Results vs ISO 8573-1:2010
™Aircheck Report
[email protected] 800.247.1024 x4
ISO 8573-1:2010reports Pressure Dewpoint in °C
ISO 8573-1:2010Total Oil for Class 1 or 2
= Oil Aerosol + Oil VaporEstimate of Uncertainty
In past studies of Quality Control samples, 95% of the time the true value was
found to exist within this percentage interval
DIAGNOSTICREPORT
PROREPORT
cont
amina
nts
gase
s & ot
her
lab an
alyse
s
++
NO P
ASS/
FAIL
DESI
GNAT
ION
==
(E) For samples at line pressure. Please advise if sample was taken at the dryer outlet; that limit is 10°C below the lowest temperature.(G) If lowest temperature and line pressure are not cited on the Data Sheet, values of 0°C and 50 psig are used for calculations.(L) Results for oil components in ppmw, if included, appear within brackets.(M) Specification limits are ISA 7.0.01-1996 as modified by Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. ISO 8573-1:2012 methods are used (as
modified by Trace Analytics, LLC)
Richard A. Smith, Laboratory Directorwww.AirCheckLab.com We Do One Thing –Test Compressed Air
Results relate only to items tested.This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written permission of Trace Analytics, LLC
© Copyright 9/23/2016, Trace Analytics, LLCAccredited Since 1991 By American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
Certificate No. 322.01 Accredited In The Chemical Field of Testing
ResultsNotes
SpecificationNotes
(N) A result of “None” indicates that no particles >40 m were observed when scanning the entire surface of the filter.
LaboratoryNotes
(1) At the 95% confidence interval as a percent of the specification limit includes sampling and analytical estimates of uncertainty.(2) Gases named in ISO 8573-6 Table 2 and/or other measurands required by the specification or customer.
(Q) The limits of quantification for these size ranges (that are larger than ISO 8573-1 ranges) are based on the lower end of each range for whole filter counting.
ACCREDITED
Y O U R M I C R O R E P O R T S E X P L A I N E DMICROORGANISM ANALYSISTwo-page report from a3rd party A2LA accredited lab
The Pinocchio Super II, (an impaction sampler also known as KPSII) is used to obtain microbial samples per ISO 8573-7 or your custom specifications.
Once the samples are received by the micro lab, they are incubated from 48 hours to 4 days. Colony differentiation is provided by a trained analyst who will report CFU's detected in the most likely gram stain category. Results are reported as bacteria, yeast or mold. Mold can be identified for an extra charge. You will receive your final report within 10 business days.
Test Report
4125 Independence DriveSuite 5
Schnecksville, PA 180781| Page of 2
QR________Date_____________
Report ID/ Status: 159999 Final Report
Study Completed For: Trace Analytics LLC.15768 Hamilton Pool Rd. Austin, TX 78738Ruby Ochoa Testing Certificate 3484.01
Requested By: Company ABC Distributor Client: Company XYZ
Study Completed By: Azzur Labs, LLC4125 Independence Drive · Suite 5 · Schnecksville, PA 18078484.550.7709
PO Number: 123456
Sample Date / Time: 20 Aug 2015 / NG to NGReceived Date:Condition at Receipt:Type of Sampler: SASSampler Serial #: 30429Guideline: ISO 14698Laboratory Method: Protocol_002Incubation Parameters: 5 days at 30˚C to 35˚CDeviations: None
Sterility and growth support testing were performed on the following lots of media:
Media: Lot Number: Pass/FailH15162 Pass
Initial reads can be found on raw data for: 159999
Samples were incubated at 30°C to 35°C from 21 Aug 2015 at 1:46 pm until 26 Aug 2015 at 2:33 pm. Analysis by JRH.
21 Aug 2015Good
Tryptic soy agar with lecithin & polysorbate 80 09 Sep 2015Expiration date:
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of Azzur Labs, LLC.
Test Report
4125 Independence DriveSuite 5
Schnecksville, PA 180782| Page of 2
Report ID/ Status: 159999 Final Report Colony differentiation performed on all samples.
Sample Code Sample Description
Type/AL/ Vol (L) or Area (in2)
Total Bacterial Count
Total Fungal Count
SS 0 0 <1 CFU/PlateNA
3.97
AS 9 1 10 CFU/m3NA GPC GPSFR GPNSFR GN Yeast Mold Mold ID1000 7 1 1 0 0 1 1-Cladosporium spp.
SS 3 0 3 CFU/PlateNA GPC GPSFR GPNSFR GN Yeast Mold3.97 2 1 0 0 0 0
I, the analyst, certify that this study was completed in accordance with CFR Good Manufacturing Practices and the above protocol with any deviations noted above.
The Quality Department has reviewed this report and has determined that the correct methods and equipment were used and that the reported results accurately reflect the data.
Acronyms: AS - Air sample NE - Not established CFU - Colony forming unitSS - Surface sample NA - Not applicable TNR - Test not requestedSWH-Sterile White Hyphae NG - Not given AL - Activity levelQR- Quality Representative
The following acronyms are used for colony differentiation. This is the most likely category the organism falls into. The definitive category cannot be determined unless a Gram stain or identification was completed. The most common sources of the organisms are included.
Category Acronym Common SourcesGram positive cocci GPC Human skin and mucous membranesGram positive spore forming rod GPSFR Soil, cardboard
GPNSFR Human skin and mucous membranes, water
Gram negative GN Water, soil, plants
See “Acronyms” below
#2 Tank
#3 Post Control
Gram positive non spore forming rod (includes filamentous bacteria)
SCD - Status cannot be determined
Total Microbial Count
#1 Pre Control
Your Results Your ResultsBroken Down
+ =
Cont
rol S
ampl
es (p
re &
pos
t) pe
r ISO
857
3-7
[email protected] 800.247.1024 x4
TRACE Analytics LLC
Top Related