Atmospheric Change
1. Ozone depletion in stratosphere
2. Global warming and climate change
Two major issues – four lectures
Stock vs. Fund Pollutants
1. Fund pollutants: environment has some assimilative capacity
2. Stock pollutants: environment has little or no assimilative capacity
Economic importance is that stock pollutants continue to accumulate or are persistent: the problem is dynamic not static
Issues in atmospheric change:
1. Activities affect basic chemistry
2. Pollutants accumulate
3. Effects are global
4. Economic impacts may be severe
5. Consequences are uncertain
Ozone depletion
Main issue:
Ozone in stratosphere blocks UVDepletion of ozone was predicted in 1974
Depletion was first observed in 1985
More UV means…
- skin cancer- lower agricultural yields- mutation in phytoplankton
Source: British Antarctic Survey, data online at http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/met/jds/ozone/data/ZOZ5699.DAT
Ozone depletion: main cause
Main cause of ozone depletion is worldwide use of fluorocarbons, especially cholorofluorocarbons (CFCs).
CFCs are: catalysts to convert O3 (“ozone”) to O2
inert, and therefore persistent
Chemical Process: Destruction of O3 by Cl
1. UV radiation breaks off a chlorine atom from a CFC (CFCl3)molecule.
2. The chlorine atom attacks an ozone molecule (O3), breaking it apart and destroying the ozone.
3. The result is an ordinary oxygen molecule (O2) and a chlorine monoxide molecule (ClO).
4. The chlorine monoxide molecule (ClO) is attacked by a free oxygen atom releasing the chlorine atom and forming an ordinary oxygen molecule (O2).
5. The chlorine atom is now free to attack and destroy another ozone molecule (O3). One chlorine atom can repeat this destructive cycle thousands of times.
Source: National Center for Atmospheric Research-UCAR
CFCs: main uses
RefrigerationAir conditioningSpray propellantsFoam production
Solvents
Ubiquitous in industry and consumer products in 1960s, 70s, and 80s.
Main benefit: inert
CFCs: main problems
No breakdown ==> persistentin upper atmosphere (10-30 m.a.s.l.)
CFCs are catalysts in converting O3 to O2
Annual decreases in ozone measured to be between 1-6%
Ozone depletion: consequences
1. More UV transmission
2. CFCs are greenhouse gases and therefore increase global warming
3. Less ozone has a cooling effect andtherefore mitigates global warming
Net effect on global warming ambiguous,but other negative effects are clear.
Ozone depletion: policy context
MAC
MDF
CFC emissions
$
The optimal level is near zero, so a ban is likely to be an
efficient approach.
Montreal Protocol
1987 agreement signed by most nationsamended in 1990 and 1992
Called for complete elimination of CFCs: - in industrialized countries by 1996
(done) - in developing countries by 2006
(still in progress)
CFC replacements(hydrochloroflurocarbons)
Two issues:
1. HCFCs are also ozone depleting
2. Economic incentives to develop recovery systems
but… since CFCs are still available in less developed countries, an incentive for illegal importation exists.
What Progress?
“Perhaps the single most successful international agreement to date has been the Montreal Protocol.”- Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the United Nations
But…according to NASA, from September 21-30, 2006 the average area of the ozone hole was the largest ever observed, at 10.6 million square miles.
For more information, visit:
http://www.theozonehole.com/montreal.htm
www.atm.ch.cam.ac.uk/tour/
and
www.ciesin.org/TG/PI/POLICY/montpro.html
Top Related