1
Adjudicator Grading
and Referral Policy
2015
2
Contents Adjudicator Grading and Referral 3
Approach 3
Transparency 3
Objective and Consistent 4
Outcome Focused 4
Application 4
Adjudicator Grading 5
Relevant Experience 5
Relevant Qualifications/Expertise 6
Relevant Skills 6
Reclassification of adjudicators 6
Option for Nominating for Adjudications 6
Summary of Criteria for Grading of Adjudicators 7
Selection Criteria for Assessing Adjudication Applications and Referring Applications to Adjudicators 7
Claim Amount 7
Material Issues in Dispute 8
Specialist Discipline / Work Experience 8
Voided Decisions 9
Adjudicators Fees 9
Reasonable Adjudicator Fees 9
Reasonable Hourly Fees 10
Referral of Applications to Same Adjudicator 11
Exceptions and Availability 11
Summary of Criteria for Assessing Adjudication Applications and Appointing Suitable Adjudicators 12
Version 2
3
Adjudicator Grading and Referral Policy
2015
1 Adjudicator Grading and Referral
2 Approach
2.1 Transparency
4
2.2 Objective and Consistent
2.3 Outcome Focused
3 Application
5
4 Adjudicator Grading
4.1 Relevant Experience
6
4.2 Relevant Qualifications/Expertise
4.3 Relevant Skills
7
4.4 Reclassification of adjudicators
4.5 Option for Nominating for Adjudications
Summary of Criteria for Grading of Adjudicators
8
5 Selection Criteria for Assessing Adjudication Applications and
Referring Applications to Adjudicators
5.1 Claim Amount
5.2 Material Issues in Dispute
9
5.3 Specialist Discipline/Expertise
5.4 Voided Decisions
6 Adjudicator Fees
10
6.1 Reasonable Adjudicator Fees
6.2 Referral of Applications to Same Adjudicator
11
6.3 Exceptions and Availability
Summary of Criteria for Assessing Adjudication Applications and Appointing
Suitable Adjudicators
Top Related