• Introduction
• PABRA Partnerships (What and How)
• Collaboration between TLII- PABRA – Seed Systems Example
Uganda - Sudan Tanzania (North) DRC - W, North& East. Kenya - Rwanda Burundi - E thiopia Madagascar Angola - Lesotho
Malawi - Mozambique Swaziland - South Africa Tanzania-South - Zambia Zimbabwe - DR Congo-South
Central Africa Republic Congo Brazzaville Cameroun - Togo Burkina Faso Guinea Country Senegal
Dark Red Kidney
Climbing Beans
Snap Beans (French)
Large White
Small White
Pintos, Carioca s
Sugar, Tan & Yellow
Others
Small Red
Red Mottled
CIAT –Africa Regional Programs
CIAT HQ
Tanzania & Zimbabwe
Tanzania & Ethiopia
D R Congo & South Africa
Kenya
South Africa & Ethiopia
South Africa & Madagascar
Kenya
Rwanda
Malawi & Uganda
Shared Breeding Responsibilities:
CIAT-HQ, CIAT-Africa & NARS
1. Structure of the networks…Primary and secondary partners (National Level)
Existing strong linkages between NBP, NGOs and Department of Extension at District Level (Dark Blue Circles)
OLD AND NEW PABRA’s PHASES
Gene$c improvement
ISFM & IPDM
Wider Impact
Community skills and knowledge
Gender and equity
Partner skills and knowledge
Ins$tu$onal capacity (network)
Increased u$liza$on of bean based technologies
Enhanced capacity of communi$es
Strengthening ins$tu$on and organiza$on capacity
Improved Nutri$on, Food Security, Income and Community
Empowerment for Poverty Allevia$on, and in a Sustainable
Manner
Outputs Outcomes Impact
PABRA Planning of
new Framework
Resilience – Improved varieties Resilience Non
varietal
Access and utilization of
micronutrient-rich bean varieties and
products
Opportunities of new and expanding
markets
Reaching end users
Knowledge sharing and use, policy,
M&E
Gender Equality
Partnerships with TL-II TL-I
MAPPING COMPLEMENTARY PROJECTS/PRGMS IN PABRA
Outcome
Resilience varieties
Res Non- var
Nutrition
Markets
REU
Capacity
Gender
KT
4
4
AGRA
5
1
√
5
2
√
BMGF
5
5
4
√
NUTRIBEAN
3
3
3
HP
2
2
√
MKF
3
3
√
MSI CRSP ASARECA
BMZ NGO’s GOVTs
1 1 2 √
1 √
1 √ √
1 √ √
√ √
√ √
√ √ √
DONORS AND DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS
Figures indicate number of countries
Mutual Benefits of Collaboration
Mutual Benefits of Collaboration
PABRA serves as integrating Umbrella
Examples of Current Seed System-related projects
• TLII (Kenya + Ethiopia) • McKnight (Malawi, Moz., S. Tanzania) • (HP+- DRC and Rwanda)
• AGRA ( a number of PABRA country members) nber
• PABRA-funded directly
– Uganda – DRC – Zambia
– Zimbabwe
Seed Systems Trends in PABRA 2003-2008
• Programmatic and impact oriented seed systems
• Target 2.5 million households but reach
7.5 households
• Development of M+E for tracking and learning lessons
Contributing factors
Linking Variety Development to :
– Efficient release or variety users’ acceptance
– Engagement of partners and sharing responsibility
– Linking variety development to bean users/value chain actors and systems
Seed Systems Trend in PABRA (cont’nd) 2009-2013
• Set higher objectives • Strategies:
– Optimizing the role of private sector Strengthen
– Private and Public sector partnership
– Strengthen seed systems to output marketing/utilizations
– Strengthen platforms
Seed Systems PABRA TLII
• Developed knowledge, skills and tools by PABRA helped to strengthen Bean seed systems in TLII countries (Ethiopia and Kenya): – Both countries are members of PABRA – Understanding of seed systems – Linking to the bean value chain actors – Partnership development – Information tools and their wider uses
Seed Systems TLII-8.3 PABRA
Opportunity to add value :
• Commercialization of small packs • Seed quality monitoring and risks associated • Cost of seed production • M&E Systems to understand who is reached
Seed Systems TLII-8.3 --PABRA
Domestication and scaling up of promising approaches – e.g. small packs in other PABRA countries
Malawi, Zambia, SA in small scale farming systems Uganda Rwanda Cameroon Burundi Tz
Thanks You Merci beaucoup
Top Related