8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 1/21
By: ParvanehBy: ParvanehEbrahimiEbrahimi
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 2/21
A Brief Introduction to PDS
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 3/21
- ( )Piece Wise Direct Standardization PDS- ( )Piece Wise Direct Standardization PDS
M a steaster
S la v ela v e
i
S u b s eu b s e
22S u b s eu b s e
11
- +i u i v
r r j
==
When shift occurs in columns dimension When shift occurs in columns dimension
= (F diag r= (F diag r jj))
…0 0 …0 0 0 0…0
0
=BandWidth 3
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 4/21
- ( )Piece Wise Direct Standardization PDS- ( )Piece Wise Direct Standardization PDS
When shift occurs in rows dimension When shift occurs in rows dimension
Masteraster Slavelave
j
-
+
j
r
j
s
q q j
==
= (F diag q= (F diag q jj))=BandWidth 3
0 0… 0
…0 0
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 5/21
:In this paper
A method is presented to standardize two-dimensional responses (e.g., GC/MS, LC/UV)measured on multiple instruments or on a
single instrument under different operationalconditions.
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 6/21
INTRODUCTION
The second-order data collected from liquidchromatography with ultraviolet spectroscopicdetection (LC/UV) can have a shift in retention time,due to temperature and pressure fluctuations and
column aging, as well as a wavelength shift in the UVspectrometer and a spectroscopic intensity variation,due to the misalignment of the monochromator andlight source intensity changes.
To make things worse, when such instrumentalvariations occur in second-order data, it is difficult todecide whether the variations come from one order orthe other or both.
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 7/21
Theory
first-order piecewise direct standardization (PDS):
R1=R2 F The banded diagonal matrix F is arranged in such a way that theresponse at every specific channel on the first instrument can be
represented as a linear combination of the responses in a smallwindow near this specific channel on the second instrument.second-order piecewise direct standardization (PDS):
N1= A N2 B T h e le ft tra n sfo rm a tio n w ill co rre ct fo r sh ift an d in te n sity
d iffe re n ce s b e tw e e n th e ro w s o f 1 a n d 2 ( . .,e g standardizing
) :th e LC o rd e r w ith th e fo llo w in g b a n d e d d ia g o n a l m a trix
( = , ,… , )i i 1 2 p
The right transformation will correct for shift and intensity differences between the columns of 1 and 2 ( . .,e g standardizing the UV
) :order with the following banded diagonal form
( = , ,… , )j j 1 2 q
,1 N2 (dimensioned m x ) n
,1 N2 (dimensioned m x ) n
(dimensioned m x ) p
≤p m
B(dimensioned n x ) q
≤q n
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 8/21
Numerical solution
It is insightful to write out the expression for a typical element in N1,N1,ij,as a function of a corresponding local submatrix of the elements
in N2 by the use of the two right and left transformation matrices:
N2 is a (u + v + 1) * (r + s + 1) submatrix of N2
ai appears in the expressions for all elements on the ith row of N1and bj appears in the expressions for all elements on the jth columnof N1
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 9/21
A nonlinear least-squares method is proposed here to solvefor all nonzero parameters in A and B simultaneously. The
numerical procedure used is the Gauss-Newton method:
Thus the valid ranges for i and j in eq.are:
u + 1 ≤ i ≤ m- v and r + 1 ≤ j≤ n – sAs a result, p and q are given by:
p = m - u - v and q = n- r -s
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 10/21
Uniqueness of solution
there are p x q usable elements in N1, the number of independent elements in N1, is limited by its rank and is givenas:
rank (N1) x max(m,n)
necessary and sufficient condition for the uniqueness of asolution is:
This equation implies that second-order standardization canbe accomplished with only one sample, preferably acomplicated sample with high rank.Compared to first-order standardization, where multiplestandard samples are required, this may be considered as one
additional second order advantage.
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 11/21
/omputer Simulation of LC UV Data
The chromatograms and spectra for nine components weregenerated using Gaussian peaks. Seven out of these ninecomponents were used to generate a bilinear response matrixN:
The remaining two components were combined with two of the components included in N to form another bilinearresponse M:
To simulate a deviation from the Lambert-Beer law:
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 12/21
:true responses N1 and M1 on the firstinstrument
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 13/21
The responses on the second instrument were simulatedthrough a nonlinear shift of both the chromatographic andspectral axes. This nonlinear shift was generated using a
quadratic form a + bx + cx 2
N and M were subjected to this shift to generate the bilinearresponses on the second instrument, N2,M2.
In the simulation, N1 and N2 were used as the standard
sample responses while M1 and M2 were used as the testsample responses.
h e d a ta o n th e s e c o n d in stru m e n t w a s
:im u la te d b y th e fo llo w in g p ro c e d u re
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 14/21
Responses from two instruments
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 15/21
To measure the stability of the proposed parameter estimation
method, a standard deviation was also calculated for A and B,which is the mean standard deviation of all elements in theestimated A or B for Six noise levels:0.00%, 0.05%, 0.10%,0.50%, 1.00%,and 5.00%(as compared to the A and B calculated at 0.00% noise level).
( ) & ( )T D A S T D B
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 16/21
Modeling ErrorIn each simulation, A and B were estimated from the standardsample responses on both instruments and a residual matrixwas calculated for equation which indicates thegoodness of the model.From this individual matrix, a modeling error was calculatedas the mean of the standard deviations of all elements.
N1= N2 B
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 17/21
/C UV experiment
One standard sample(3 dyes) and one test sample(3 dyes)were made using4 different dyes. Two chromatographic runs were performedwith a one week interval.“The responses of the two samples measured during the first
run”
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 18/21
When these two samples were measured during thesecond run, the responses became significantly
different:
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 19/21
Residual matrix of the samplesafter standardization
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 20/21
Conclusion
v The computer simulation has indicated the capacity of second-order standardization in modeling both thenonlinear shifts and nonlinear intensity changes, with arelatively small bandwidth for the right and lefttransformations.
vv In both the computer simulation and the LC/UV
experimental data study, the extreme importance of thedesign of the standard sample is observed.
v
v
v On the other hand, the selection of bands in thetransformation matrices can be flexible within a certainrange with relatively stable standardization
performance.
8/8/2019 2D Standardization
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2d-standardization 21/21
!THANK YOU
Top Related