2010 Citizen Satisfaction Survey
Results
November 2010
2
Purpose
1. Determine how satisfied citizens are with quality of life, government and safety
2. Identify strengths and opportunities
3. Develop action plans for improvement
3
Methodology
Data not available by district
1. Survey was conducted by the Center for Survey Research, at the University of Virginia from (August-September 2010)
2. A telephonic survey with pre-notification letters sent to all listed phone numbers.
3. Telephone numbers included both cell-phone and landline
4. 25% response rate; 550 responses from randomly selected residents with a sampling error of + 4.2 percent
4
All Time High Ratings
The Chesterfield County 2010 Citizen Satisfaction Survey ratings are in general higher than those in
2004 and 2006 and are comparable to or higher than those in 2008.
5
Highlighted Areas
I. Quality of Life
II. County Government
III. Public Safety
IV. Normative Data
V. Significant Variations in 2010
VI. Post Survey Actions
6
I. Quality of Life
• Quality of life• Education provided by schools • A place to raise children• Services for children and youth• County appearance • Environment
7
30.9%
63.3%
5.2%0.6%
30.0%
62.8%
6.8%
0.4%
37.2%
56.8%
5.3%0.7%
35.9%
57.6%
5.3%
1.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2004 2006 2008 2010
Quality of LifeOverall, how would you rate the “Quality of Life” in Chesterfield County?
Excellent
Good
FairPoor
“Above” the national norm “Above” local government norm
Fair/Poor 5.8% 7.2% 6.0% 6.5%
Good/Excellent 94.2% 92.8% 94.0% 93.5%
8
Quality of LifeHow would you rate schools in preparing students for success beyond high school:
38.3%
45.1%
11.6%
5.0%
45.9%
39.4%
10.5%
4.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2008 2010
Fair/Poor 16.6% 14.7%
Excellent/Good 83.4% 85.2%
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
9
Quality of LifeHow would you rate schools providing opportunities for citizens to contribute to the success of the public schools?
23.5%
56.3%
15.7%
4.5%
30.5%
50.4%
15.0%
4.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2008 2010Fair/Poor 20.2% 19.1%
Excellent/Good 79.8% 80.9%
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
10
39.5%
52.8%
6.8%
0.9%
38.8%
53.1%
6.9%
1.2%
46.7%
46.2%
5.4%
1.7%
51.2%
40.9%
6.6%
1.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2004 2006 2008 2010
Quality of Life
Excellent
Good
FairPoor
“Above” the national norm “Above” local government norm
How would you rate Chesterfield as a place to raise children?
Fair/Poor 7.7% 8.1% 7.1% 7.9%
Good/Excellent 92.3% 92.0% 92.9% 92.1%
11
14.9%
60.6%
20.4%
4.1%
19.9%
57.7%
16.7%
5.7%
28.5%
50.6%
15.4%
5.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2004 2008 2010
Quality of Life
*Question was not asked in 2006
How would you rate services for children and youth, not including public education?
Fair/Poor 24.5% 22.4% 20.9%
Good/Excellent 75.5% 77.6% 79.1%
“Above” the national norm “Above” local government norm
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
12
18.2%
62.0%
17.4%
2.4%
19.1%
65.7%
13.0%
2.2%
22.7%
63.8%
11.8%
1.7%
22.4%
64.7%
11.4%
1.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2004 2006 2008 2010
Quality of LifeHow would you rate the overall cleanliness and appearance of the county?
Fair/Poor 19.8% 15.2% 13.5% 12.9%
Good/Excellent 80.2% 84.8% 86.5% 87.1%
“Above” the national norm “Above” local government norm
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
13
9.9%
58.8%
24.6%
6.6%
8.7%
57.6%
24.2%
9.5%
10.9%
62.6%
21.8%
4.7%
20.2%
58.4%
18.5%
2.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2004 2006 2008 2010
Quality of LifeHow would you rate the preservation and protection of the environment?
Fair/Poor 31.2% 32.7% 26.5% 21.4%
Good/Excellent 68.8% 66.3% 73.5% 78.6%
“Below” the national norm “Below” local government norm
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
14
II. County Government
• Employee ratings for:• Knowledge• Overall customer service
• Management of the county• Getting citizens' views & opinions
15
County GovernmentHow would you rate Chesterfield County Employees on knowledge about county services?
“Similar to” national norm “Similar to” local government norm
18.9%
66.3%
12.9%
1.9%
16.2%
66.1%
14.8%
2.9%
21.2%
64.5%
11.4%
2.9%
45.5%
36.2%
11.9%
6.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2004 2006 2008 2010
Fair/Poor 14.8% 17.7% 14.3% 18.3%
Excellent/Good 85.2% 82.3% 85.7% 81.7%
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
16
County GovernmentHow would you rate Chesterfield County Employees on overall customer service?
18.5%
65.8%
13.6%
2.1%
14.3%
68.5%
14.7%
2.5%
27.3%
56.5%
13.2%
3.0%
36.2%
50.8%
10.3%
2.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2004 2006 2008 2010
Fair/Poor 15.7% 17.2% 16.2% 13.0%
Excellent/Good 84.3% 82.8% 83.8% 87.0%
“Similar to” national norm “Above” local government norm
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
17
How would you rate the quality of management of the county?
County Government
“Below” the national norm
9.3%
53.6%
29.7%
7.4%
7.0%
56.4%
29.6%
7.0%
10.4%
61.6%
23.3%
4.7%
9.9%
55.7%
27.3%
7.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2004 2006 2008 2010Fair/Poor 37.1% 36.6% 28.0% 34.4%
Good/Excellent 62.9% 63.4% 72.0% 65.6%
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
18
County GovernmentHow would you rate Chesterfield County in getting citizens’ views and opinions before making major decisions that affect the county?
“Similar to” national norm “Similar to” local government norm
6.2%
37.4%
36.5%
19.9%
5.1%
39.6%
36.0%
19.3%
6.0%
41.6%
37.6%
14.8%
8.2%
42.4%
34.4%
15.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2004 2006 2008 2010
Fair/Poor 56.4% 55.3% 52.4% 49.4%
Excellent/Good 43.6% 44.7% 47.6% 50.6%
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
19
• 9-1-1 Emergency Communication Center• Personal safety…
III. Public Safety
• Overall safety index
• …in neighborhoods• …in parks• …in shopping areas• …in schools• …in homes• …on roads as you travel
20
59.9%
36.0%
3.2%
0.9%
59.3%
36.3%
3.9%
0.5%
60.0%
33.7%
5.4%
0.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Services Competence Attitudes andbehavior
Public Safety How would you rate 9-1-1 employees on:
Fair/Poor 4.1% 4.4% 6.3%
Excellent/Good 95.9% 95.6% 93.7%
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
21
Public Safety IndexPlease rate how you feel about your personal safety in the following areas:
***“Below” national & local norm**“Similar to” national & local norm*“Similar to” national norm
44.8% 46.6% 7.1% 1.5%
37.8% 55.1% 6.2% 0.9%
68.1% 31.3% 0.4% 0.2%
51.0% 45.8% 2.9% 0.3%
35.0% 61.1% 3.7% 0.2%
14.1% 47.5% 30.1% 8.3%
39.8% 52.8% 6.9% 0.5%
49.3% 44.9% 4.5% 1.3%
63.5% 34.3% 2.0% 0.2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Overall safety index
***Your neighborhood during the day
**Parks during the day
Shopping areas
Schools
*Your home
**Your neighborhood at night
**Parks at night
Roads as you travel
Very Unsafe Very Safe
97.8%
94.2%
92.6%
61.6%
96.1%
96.8%
99.4%
92.9%
Favorable Rating
91.4%
22
• 497 total jurisdictions*
• Questions matched - 14
• 21 local jurisdictions across Virginia
• Questions matched - 10
National Comparisons
Local Government Comparisons
IV. Normative DataData provided by The National Research Center
*includes twelve in Canada
23
• 4 questions were “Above” the norm
• 5 questions were “Similar to” the norm
• 5 questions were “Below” the norm
National Comparisons
Normative Data
24
Local Government Comparisons
Local Governments Include: Arlington County, VA; Stafford County, VA; Botetourt County, VA; Chesapeake, VA; Hanover County, VA; Prince William County, VA; Virginia Beach, VA; Newport News, VA; Spotsylvania County, VA; Albemarle County, VA; Chesterfield County, VA; James City County, VA; Roanoke, VA; Williamsburg, VA; Hopewell, VA; Lynchburg, VA; Staunton, VA; Northampton County, VA; Lexington, VA
• 5 questions were “Above” the norm
• 3 questions were “Similar to” the norm
• 2 questions were “Below” the norm
NORMATIVE DATANormative Data
25
V. Significant Variationsin 2010
1. Preservation and protection of the environment 4.5%
2. Safety in parks at night 9.5%
3. Management of the county* 6.4%*2010 rating is better than 2004 and 2006
26
VI. Post Survey Actions
Communication:– Present to CAPC– Provide results to Board of Supervisors– Present to Department Directors– Communicate to Employees– Post results to Internet/Intranet– Communicate to the Public
Action items will involve reviewing these results and addressing them for ongoing improvement.
Top Related