1
UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO
Operational Problem:• Warfighters are burdened with overcrowded workspace and
cumbersome physical infrastructure caused by multiple computer workstations at every level of classification. USCENTCOM alone supports eight separate domains
• Rapid increase in requirement for high definition & 3D video
Transition:• Commercial and government off the shelf procurement handled similar
to other security devices
Specifics: JCTD will demonstrate the capability to :- Simultaneously access multiple virtual information domains from a
single workstation- Deliver high definition & 3D video while accessing multiple domains- Flexibly create domains and connect/disconnect domain access- Reduce multi-domain network infrastructure- Save space, weight, and power consumption- Leverage this technology in garrison, forward & warfighting
environments- Certify capability under SABI and TSABITechnologies:• Black Channel Zero Client Desktop
Hardware accelerated multi-domain end user device Delivers large graphics, simultaneous display of multiple domains
Requirement:• Infrastructure reduction, must be quickly deployable, set up tactical
multi-domain environment• Reduce number and complexity of networks • IPL #6, IPL #7
Competing Technology:• None with faithful 3d graphics and video feeds, except air gap• TCS and UC2 both lack 3D graphics & HD video and are slow due to
technology• Cannot provide communication services at line rate• Higher Certification & Accreditation risk• Do not provide lossless data• Larger code footprint exposed for attack
TSABI – Top Secret/SCI and Below Interoperability SABI – Secret and Below Interoperability
MD SAVE JCTD Candidate Questions (Summary)
Funding ($K) - Proposed FY13 FY14 Total
CPSG $2,300 $1,000 $3,300DISA $2,000 $1,300 $3,300
OSD/RF $2,000 $4,000 $6,000Other $900 $800 $1,700 Total $7,200 $7,100 $14,300
2
UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO
MLS HH JCTD Candidate Questions (Summary)
Operational Problem:Existing handheld devices operate in a single domain (NIPR or SIPR) and rely on legacy operating systems and custom hardware. No MLS capable handheld devices exist. Users are forced to carry multiple devices or use legacy devices that do not support mobile applications. There are no MLS capable handheld devices today.
Requirement:
• Provide a single device that can access multiple networks and run MLS end user apps.
• Enable thin client Android sessions on different handheld device types.• Prove MLS apps that run on handheld devices.• Provide necessary security governance, system maintenance and
auditing capabilities.
Competing capabilities:
• Custom solutions – expensive per device, legacy OS, no mobile apps, unsustainable.
• Client-side hypervisors – special handsets, poor battery life, distributed patching, unlikely to achieve true COTS commercial transfer.
Specifics: Year 1: • Demonstrate remote hosted Android (DroidCloud), client app for Android
and MLS capability.
Year 2: • Integrate additional capability, complete configuration and documentation,
complete C&A process.
Technologies:
• Google – Android, Google Search, Google Earth• Cisco – Cius tablet, VPN, AppHQ, vBlock• BlueSpace – Unity, Discover, GeoSpace, TSB• DroidCloud – DroidCloud server and client• Intel – McAfee AV, Wind River Enterprise Android• Cummings - Sleeve
Transition: TBD
Funding ($K) - Proposed FY13 FY14 Total
NSA $1,500 $500 $2,000
OSD CIO $400 $0 $400
SOCOM $500 $500 $1,000
Navy PEO C4I $500 $500 $1,000
NORTHCOM $400 $0 $400
DISA $1,000 $1,000 $2,000
NGA $500 $500 $1,000
Army $1,000 $500 $1,500
AF CPSD $1,000 $500 $1,500
OSD/FRD $4,000 $4,000 $8,000
Total $10,800 $8,000 $18,800
3
UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO
Trusted H2 JCTD Candidate Questions (Summary)
Operational Problem:
• Warfighter’s currently cannot access multiple domains without carrying several devices, which increase the combat load on the warfighter
Specifics: Year 1: • Integrate key technologies; start certification and
accreditation
Year 2: • Integrate capabilities required for operational utility and
demonstrate enterprise & tactical use cases; maturing technology for insertion into acquisition program.
Technologies:
• COTS smartphones and tablets• Isolation technology (Currently implemented in high
assurance systems)• Fielded Tactical radios (sleeve components)
Transition: AF CPSD-NI, USMC PG23, USA PM SWAR
Rifle Company OTM
Aviation CombatElement OTM
Logistics Combat ElementOTM
Ground Combat ElementOTM
Rifle CompanyOTM
Marine Expeditionary UnitCommand Element
ATH
UAS
TrustedH2 w/Sleeve
TrustedH2 w/Sleeve
TrustedH2 w/Sleeve
TrustedH2 w/oSleeve
Civil Affairs Team
TrustedH2 w/oSleeve
Reach back to the Global Information Grid
And DISA MVNO
Requirement:• Provide multiple devices that can access multiple domains and
communication transports in enterprise and expeditionary environments.
• Provide necessary security, governance, system maintenance and auditing capabilities for access to classified communication networks to enable command and control, intelligence and logistics battlefield functions.
• Integrate a COTS based approach to meet military requirements and deliver an enhanced foot mobile capability.
Competing Technology:• Custom solutions – expensive per device, legacy OS, no mobile apps,
unsustainable.• Cloud-based implementation – not likely to provide high availability with
intermittent connectivity; requires robust enterprise infrastructure to support access to multiple domains.
Funding ($K) - Proposed FY13 FY14 Total USAF (P) $2,000 $1,000 $3,000 USA (P) $3,000 $3,000 $6,000
USMC $2,000 $0 $2,000 DISA (P) $2,000 $2,000 $4,000
OSD/RFD (P) $3.000 $3,000 $6,000 USN NAVAIR (P) $2,000 $2,000 $4,000
Total $14,000 $11,000 $25,000 CNCR $4,350 $4,350 $8,200
4
UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO
JOLTED TACTICS JCTDOperational Problem:
• US forces and interagency/coalition partners lack robust capability and capacity to establish anytime, anywhere access to data, services and
other users in support of special operations, disaster relief, humanitarian response, foreign internal defense, civil affairs, and other security
cooperation, stability and similar activities• TOC level comms inflexible/take days to install; tactical comms lack
band-width and mobility; none offer flexibility of 4G Long Term Evolution (LTE)systems
• Limited comms interoperability in support of information assurance and coalition interactions
Transition:• SOCOM will transition for SOF; NAVAIR for general purpose forces
Specifics: Provide multi-layered, secure, IP-based architecture to enable high bandwidth communications and information sharing at tactical edge
• Year 1—(Spiral 1) Critical Design Review; Technical Demo; CONOPS/TTP; Transition Plan; NSA Approval for Tactical Secret; functional prototypes (air,
ground, maritime)• Year 2—(Spiral 2) Operational Demonstration/Joint Utility Assessment; NSA
Approval for Collateral Secret; Certification Plan; Final CONOPS/TTPs
Technologies:• Lightweight, tailorable 4G comms packages – COTS infrastructure & handsets
• Key attribute: government/commercial encryption, data compression• Rapidly deployable IP base stations that form and create tactical networks
IVO mission activities• Micro -base stations for remote signal dispersion and gap coverage
• Any COTS 4G LTE devices supporting GOTS/COTS applications as required
Requirement: All IPLs are within COCOM top 10 priorities
Competing Technology: None• Current 4G systems are not employed beyond combat
evaluation within SOF – next leap ahead with significant applicability to Services
• JOLTED TACTICS will provide proof-of-concept for USSOCOM and service component procurement
• Follow-on potential with OGA community is enormous—Defense Support to Civil Authorities, Law Enforcement, and Search and Rescue
• Service interest anticipated; for instance, USN (Kearsarge Amphibious Readiness Group conducting multi-ship 4G LTE testing)
Funding ($M) FY13 FY14 TotalSOCOM $.55M $.55M $1.1M
AFSPC $.50M $.50M $1.0MOSD/RFD $1.05M $1.05M $2.1M
Total $2.1M $2.1M $4.2M
FY13
Issue(s): Continuing to work with C4 Assessment Division (Joint Staff) to represent Service equities; coordinating with multiple
organizations and test venues
Critical Non-Cash Resources: $.45M (SMDC ARSTRAT) $.75M (JS/J6)
IPLs (FY) SOCOM AFRICOM PACOM11-15 1, 5, 6, 9 2, 4, 5, 6, 9 4, 812-17 4, 7, 8, 10 1, 3, 5, 9 1, 6, 713-17 4, 5, 6 2, 3, 4, 9 1, 2, 714-18 2, 3, 5 1 1, 2, 7
UNCLASSIFIED
SECDEF Priorities JCTD Supports: _P___ A2AD __S__ Building Partnerships __S__ Defend Homeland __S__ Counter Terrorism
COCOM Sponsor: SOCOM, AFRICOM, PACOM (SOCPAC)OE: Mr. Fritz Schulz
Top Related