1
The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments – a typical case of the blind men and the elephant
René Kemp, Serena Pontoglio
DIME Workshop on Empirical Analyses of Environmental Innovations. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), Karlsruhe, January, 17th-18th, 2008
2
Environmental policy: a driver of the eco-innovation process
Environmental policy is one of many factors driving the eco-innovation process (demand-pull factor).
This is something recognized by the economic theory and empirically investigated
Much attention has been dedicated to studing the effects of different environmental policy instruments on the rate and direction of technological change associated with
3
To compare the findings of studies on the innovation effects of environmental policy instruments based on different methodologies:
1. Theoretical models of incentives
2. Econometric studies
3. Case studies
4. Surveys
Aims: Show how findings are influenced by methodological choices
(approach and constraints) Propose a research agenda to guide future empirical research
Focus and aim of the paper
4
Focus: assess and rank firm incentives for innovation (dymanic efficiency effects) in pollution control under different regulatory regimes; Incentives: measured as cost savings in firms abatement costs (direct costs,
transfer losses or transfer gains). Cost savings are indicative for the probability that innovation in pollution control will occur;
Innovation: modelled as a downward shift in the marginal cost curve of emission reductions
Findings: Economic theory recognize the superiority of market-based instruments with respect to command-and-control instruments. Original analysis form Milliman and Prince (1989) and Downing and White (1986)
find that emission taxes and auctioned permits are better facilitators of technological change than regulation.
Requate and Unold (2003) and Requate (2005) in a recent review (28 models) conclude that no unequivocal ranking is possible; however price mechanisms seem to perform better
1. Theoretical models of incentives
5
2. Econometric studies
Reviews from: Jaffe et al. (2002)
“market-based instruments (MBIs) for environmental protection are likely to have significantly greater, positive impacts over time than command-and-control (CAC) approaches”
Vollebergh (2007) for OECD 26 studies reviewed, focus on different effects on the rate
and direction of technological change associated with different environmental policy instrument
Main conclusion: changes in invention, innovation and diffusion of technologies are clearly observable, but is difficult to compare the impacts of different instruments, because of different methods. The distinction between CAC and MBIs is too general and requires further investigation
6
3. Case studies Contributons are dispersed, we reviewed about 40 ex post evaluations on the effects of policies on eco-innovation. Some examples:
Authors Focus Type of policy and innovation
Main Findings
Ashford et al. (1985)
Ten regulatory cases in the US after 1970
Regulatory stringency; product and process innovation
Standard mechanisms encouraged a variety of innovations, both incremental and radical. Innovative behaviour sensible to stringency
Christiansen (2001)
Innovation effects of the Norwegian carbon tax system in the oil industry
Tax (economic instrument), technological and institutional innovations
Diffusion of available technologies and incremental process changes were the main innovation pattern observed
Taylor et al. (2005)
Innovation in SO2 control technologies
3 types of policy (regulation, support to research, ET)
Regulation stimulated different types of innovation, emission trading had a limited impact on innovation but saved costs
Mickwitz et al. (2005)
Role of policy instruments in the diffusion of innovations in two sectors
Regulation, taxation and R&D funding
Common claims are frequently contracticted. It is not possible to generalize about the role of policy instruments without considering context factors
7
Authors Focus Type of policy and innovation
Main Findings
Nill and Tiessen (2005)
Innovation consequences of CAA in the automotive sector
Standard regulation, product innovation
Policy influences the competition between technological alternatives: timing and stringency affects variation-selection dynamics
Türpitz (2004)
The drivers for environmentally-friendly product innovations
Product innovation Regulation appears to be the main driver of product-related eco-innovations
Simila (2002)
Impact of Water Act on process innovation in the Finnish Pulp&Paper industry
Water permits, process innovation
Political and Implementation issues affect compliance and innovation choices
Yarime (2005)
Policies and technologies to control mercury emissions
Regulation, clean technology versus end-of-pipe
Regulation initially forced the adoption of a suboptimal solution
8
4. Surveys
Authors Focus Type of policy and innovation
Main Findings
Becker and Engelmann (2005)
Factors promoting and hindering the adoption of innovations in the German chemical industry
End-of.pipe and clean technology
Environmental regulations are by far the most important factor in stimulating innovation, followed by reputation gains and reduction of material costs. The attainment of the regulation requirements proved to be the most important impediment for further EOP
Mazzanti and Zoboli (2006)
Eco-innovation drivers in industries in a local productive district
Different types of policies and innovations
Found evidence of networking for eco-innovation and established a positive relationship between organisational innovation and technological innovation. It shows that eco-innovation is not just about pollution control or reduction.
Frondel et al. (2004)
Influence of various policy instruments on the choice of end-of-pipe and integrated process changes in Germany
Different types of policies and innovations
Stringency is the most significant determinant of the eco-innovation process. Regulation is important especially for end-of-pipe solutions; no significant impacts of market-based instruments
Del Rio Gonzaléz (2005)
Factors influencing clean technology adoption in the Spanish Pulp and Paper industry
Environmental regulations, different kinds of innovation
The most important drivers for the adoption of environmental technologies are: corporate image, regulatory pressure, personal commitment of managers, pressure from foreign parent companies and pressure from environmental NGOs-
9
Authors Focus Type of policy and innovation
Main Findings
OECD (2007)
Role of environmental policy initiatives on environmental innovation
Different types of policies and innovations
Direct regulations (technology standards) increase the propensity to invest in EOP, while taxes and (to a lesser extent) performance standards and input bans favour the introduction of change in production process. Policy stringency is a key issue.
Rehfeld, Rennings and Ziegler (2007),
Determinants of environmental product innovations in German manufacturing sectors
Environmental regulations, product innovations
Compliance with existing and future legal requirements is an important innovation goal for 68,9% of environmental product innovators, but the econometric analysis found less relevant impact
10
Methodological constraints influence findingsTheorethical models of incentives: limited to incentives for
innovation in pollution control and end-of pipe solutions (no other forms of eco-innovation)
factors related to techno-economic context and policy-design issues are not considered
Econometric analysis: very difficult to incorporate policy
design aspects of policies the majority consider only
innovations in pollution control (no other forms of eco-innovations)
the majority use inventive activity indicators (patents and environmental R&D) and not innovation output measures
Case studies: Not possible to determine causal
links in a rigorous way Findings difficult to compare Findings are highly case-specific
Surveys: Sensitive to respondees’
knowledge Sample bias may be an issue
11
Methodological constraints influence findings
12
1. Technology responses to environmental regulations depend on more than the incentives, both inside and outside the company (techno-economic context);
2. We should not talk about innovation and environmental innovation in an unqualified way, incremental/radical, end of pipe/process integrated innovations have different environmental and economic effects and drivers;
3. Almost all firms are engaged in environmental innovation, most of them consist however of simple improvement or the adoption of technologies developed by others;
4. Technology responses are not a simple response to regulatory pressure, the link between regulator and regulated is not unidirectional, the development of an innovation may precede a policy and even exert influence over the policymaking process;
Issues of understanding: a guide for future empirical research
13
Issues of understanding: a guide for future empirical research (continued)
5. Impacts of policy instruments depend on how the instrument is formulated and used, relevant aspects are stringency, timing and combination with other instruments;
6. There is not one single best instrument to foster innovative response to environmental regulations;
7. Environmental policy can have both a positive and a negative influence on environmental innovation, the negative can be the favoring of an environmental inferior technological path, when a policy influence the competition of alternative technologies;
14
Conclusions Policy instruments cannot be usefully ranked with regard
to their effects on eco-innovation The effects of environmental policy instruments in the real
world are governed by the complexity of the innovation processes and political considerations of using instruments
There is more evidence of regulations stimulating radical innovation than of market-based instruments doing so.
Regulation can also act as a barrier to innovation More attention should be given to the analytical
soundness of models and to the results of different literatures (“let’s not be blindfolded”)
15
Top Related