1
SIPPING Working GroupIETF 69
Mary Barnes (WG co-chair)Gonzalo Camarillo (WG co-chair)
Oscar Novo (WG Secretary)
2
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all
or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to:
● the IETF plenary session, ● any IETF working group or portion thereof, ● the IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG, ● the IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB, ● any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design
team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices, ● the RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function
All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of RFC 3978 (updated by RFC 4878) and RFC 3979. Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF activity, group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this notice.
Please consult RFC 3978 (updated by RFC 4878) for details.
3
Other Notes● Need at least two Note Takers● Jabber Transcription :
● Need a mediator for Jabber session for questions.● MP3 streaming
● Use the microphone, and state your name
● Wireless: Make sure your computer is not in adhoc mode
4
WG Reviews● http://www.softarmor.com/sipping/process/
review_procedure.html● Tracking WG documents, including WG reviews,
assignments and status, with proposed WGLC (and IESG) dates for all WG documents.
● Updated every 3-4 weeks (6 updates since IETF-68)● Important for doc editors to review deadlines and make
sure current status of docs is accurate. ● WG reviews are cached in the spreadsheet, with new
reviewers liberally recruited based on mailing list feedback.
● Information is used by other SDOs to track dependencies.
● Overall progress since IETF-68 has been good!
5
RFCs Published since IETF 68
● None
6
RFC Editor’s Queue
● draft-ietf-sipping-app-interaction-framework (PS) (awaiting GRUU)
● draft-ietf-sipping-transc-conf (PS)● draft-ietf-sipping-transc-framework (Info)
7
Post-Publication Request● draft-ietf-sipping-uri-services (PS) (Waiting for related docs – consent FW)● draft-ietf-sipping-rtcp-summary (PS) (IESG Eval - Revised ID)● draft-ietf-sipping-gruu-reg-event (PS) (AD Followup – new version
available)● draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition (PS) (IESG Review – new version required)● draft-ietf-sipping-toip (Info) (AD Followup – new version required)● draft-ietf-sipping-capacity attribute (PS)● draft-ietf-sipping-dialogusage (Info) (IESG Review/AD Followup)
The following are new to this state since IETF-68:● draft-ietf-sipping-spam (Info) (IESG Review/AD Followup)● draft-ietf-sipping-sbc-funcs (Info) ● draft-ietf-sipping-consent-format (PS)● draft-ietf-sipping-pending-additions (PS) ● draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests (Info)
8
Undergoing Final Updates prior to Proto write-up
● draft-ietf-sipping-service examples (WGLC completed 1 July 2006) ● Editor (Alan Johnston) has indicated that a
new document has been submitted
9
WGLC Completed since IETF-68
● draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-01 (WGLC completed 06 April 2007)
● Publication requested
● draft-ietf-sipping-cc-framework (WGLC completed 13 April 2007) ● Editor (Alan Johnston) working on edits
● draft-ietf-sipping-race-examples (WGLC completed 14 May 2007)
● To be discussed today● draft-ietf-sipping-overload-reqs (WGLC just ended on 21 May
2007)● Editor (Jonathan Rosenberg) to make updates per review comments by
31 July 2007
10
WGLC Completed● The following 2 documents (coordinated with draft-ietf-sip-policy-
framework): ● draft-ietf-sipping-policy-package (WGLC completed 11 Jun
2007) ● draft-ietf-sipping-media-policy-dataset (WGLC completed 11
Jun 2007) Editor (Volker Hilt) to make updates per review comments by 30 July 2007
● draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-12 (Extended WGLC ended 9 July 2007)
● To be discussed today
11
Important Doc Dependencies
draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework
draft-petrie-sipping-profile-dataset
draft-ietf-sipping-media-policy-dataset
draft-ietf-sipping-policy-package
draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework
12
Undergoing WGLC● None
13
draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer (WGLC 13 Aug - 3 Sept 2007)
● Token: Doc editor (Takuya Sawada) to incorporate any feedback. WG to provide feedback and one more reviewer (Two currently: Byron Campen, Jonathan Rosenberg)
● On agenda for today.
draft-ietf-sipping-nat-scenarios (WGLC 20 Aug - 10 Sept 2007)
● Token: Doc editor (Chris Boulton) to incorporate any feedback. WG to provide feedback.
● Current reviewers: Guarav Kuhlshreshth, Vijay Gurbani, Spencer Dawkins
WGLC planned Aug/Sept.
14
WG Review Team● Thanks to the following who have provided
reviews that have allowed the WG to make progress on deliverables:
● Tolga Asveren● Spencer Dawkins● John Elwell● Roni Even● Vijay Gurbani● Cullen Jennings● Volker Hilt● Anders Kristensen
● AC Mahendran● Xavier Marjou ● AB Nataraju ● Christian Schmidt● Shida Schubert● Dave Robbins● Jari Urpalainen ● Dale Worley
15
Charter Updates Proposed● Aug 2007 SIP Service Examples to IESG as Info● Done (Dec 2006) XML Format Extension for Capacity Attributes in
Resource Lists to the IESG as PS ● Done (Dec 2006) WGLC Session Border Controller requirements ● Done (Dec 2006) WGLC SPAM problems in SIP ● Done (May 2007) WGLC Session Policy package ● Done (May 2007 WGLC User Agent Profile for Media Policy● Done (Jan 2007) Multiple Dialog Usages to IESG as Info ● Done (April 2007) WGLC Call Control Framework● Done (April 2007) WGLC SIP Torture Tests for IPv6● Done (Mar 2007) Consent-based Communications in SIP ----New----
(Framework document moved to SIP, related docs stayed in SIPPING)● Done (April 2007) Session Border Controller requirements to IESG as
Info ● Done (Mar 2007) SPAM problems in SIP to IESG as Info ● Sept 2007 WGLC NAT scenarios (ICE Dependency)
16
More Charter Updates Proposed
● Sept 2007 Session Policy package to the IESG as PS ● Sept 2007 User Agent Profile for Media Policy to the IESG as PS ● Done (May 2007) WGLC Requirements for Management of Overload in SIP ● Sept 2007 WGLC SIP Offer/Answer Examples ● Aug 2007 SIP Call Control - Transfer to IESG as Info (GRUU Dependency)● Oct 2007 Call Control Framework to the IESG as Info ● May 2007 SIP Torture Tests for IPv6 to the IESG as Info (Early)● Done (May 2007) WGLC SIP Race Condition Examples ● Dec 2007 NAT Scenarios to IESG as Info ● Sept 2007 Requirements for Management of Overload in SIP to IESG as Info ● Nov 2007 SIP Offer/Answer Examples to IESG as Info● Aug 2007 SIP Race Condition Examples to IESG as Info● Dec 2007 Revise Charter
17
Day 1 Agenda1740-1950: Note that we’re working through the 10 minute break
1740 –Status and Agenda Bash (Chairs) – 15 min
1755 - Offer/Answer: o-line Usage (Paul Kyzivat) - 20 min
1815 - Race Conditions (Paul Kyzivat) – 10 min
1825 – Service Identification (Jonathan Rosenberg) 30 min
1855 – Configuration Framework (Sumanth Channabasappa) – 35 min
1930 – Simple Application Configuration Protocol (Simo Veikkolainen) – 20 min
18
Day 2 AgendaTHURSDAY, July 26, 2007, 1300-1500, Red Lacquer
1300 – Status and Agenda Bash (Chairs) – 5 min
1305 - An Extension to SIP Events for Pausing and Resuming Notifications (Mohammad Vakil) – 15 min
1320 - SIP File Directory (Miguel Garcia) - 20 min
1340 - Transparent B2BUA (Xavier Marjou) – 15 min
1355 - Replace Instant Message in SIP (Da Qi Ren) – 15 min
1410 - Response Code for Indication of Terminated Dialog (Christer Holmberg) – 15 min
1425 – Follow-up on specific WG topics (TBD) – 35 min
19
Other drafts of interest● As usual, majority of meeting time allocated to WG
documents● Other documents get agenda time based on level of mailing
list discussion and issues requiring discussion● All agenda requests, with links to docs, are logged at:
http://www.softarmor.com/sipping/meets/ietf69/Agenda_request.html
● Single slide per topic always welcome for docs not receiving agenda time.
Completing chartered work (including detailed reviews) makes room for discussion of new work items.
20
End-point Perceptual MOS: Variation examples
Network
End-point
Packetizer
Depacketizer
Egress
Ingress
Acousticalreference
Electricalreference
Packet levelreference
Listening/Talking qualityReference points
Conversational qualityreference points
More variations:
- Comparison type; full, partial and none. - Bandwidth; narrow, wide, super-wide and full.- Codec type- Algorithm- Compliance class (e.g. ITU-T P.564 compliance)
Variations:
- Acoustical, electrical packet level. - Listening, talker, conversational.- Ingress, egress, - local end, remote end
We need a way to report these perceptual media quality measures (standardized by other bodies)
efficiently without any ambiguity
This is true even when RTCP-XR/HR is not used
Document:https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-raviraj-sipping-endpoint-mos/
Top Related