1
Mei Zhang
( National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Helicity Transport from the convection zone
to interplanetary space
Collaborators:
Boon Chye Low, Natasha Flyer, Mark Miesch (NCAR, Boulder, USA)
Yin Zhang, Chuanyu Wang, Juan Hao (NAOC, Beijing, China)
2
Helicity Transport from the convection zone to interplanetary space
--- How do we know?
Can we measure (or monitor) it?
Plan of the Talk
1. Why helicity?
2. Helicity Transport
(Physical process: convection zone – photosphere – corona – interplanetary space)
1) Observation on the photosphere
2) Creation in the convection zone
3) Consequences in the corona
4) In the interplanetary space
3. Concluding remarks
4
Magnetic helicity:
Magnetic helicity quantifies the twist (self-helicity)
and linkage (mutual-helicity) of magnetic field lines.
H=0
H=TΦ2
H= ± 2 Φ1Φ2
Magnetic helicity is a quantity that describes field topology.
(A : vector potential)
(Image credit:
T. Sakurai)
5
Magnetic helicity:
Helicity much less dissipative than energy rather transported or redistributed than dissipated magnetic field (flux and energy) then transported together avoid treating the difficult process of magnetic reconnection
Magnetic helicity is a conserved physical quantity.
(A : vector potential)
• The total magnetic helicity is still conserved in the corona even when there is a fast magnetic reconnection (Berger 1984).
6
Observation on the photosphere:
--- Hemispheric helicity sign rule
(Image credit: A. Pevtsov)
Magnetic fields are
observed to emerge into
each hemisphere with a
preferred helicity sign:
Positive in southern
hemisphere;
Negative in northern
hemisphere.
(Pevtsov et al. 1995, Bao & Zhang
1998, Hagino & Sakurai 2005)
Hemispheric rule in global magnetic field
Left: MDI; (September 1996) Right: KPVT
(Wang & Zhang 2010, ApJ, 720, 632)
The same hemispheric helicity sign rule exists, extending to 60
degrees high in latitudes, and is preserved through the whole
solar-cycle.
(Following the approach in Petvsov & Latushko 2000)
Hemispheric helicity sign rule by SP/Hinode
observation
Do not follow:
end of cycle 23
Follow: beginning
of cycle 24
(Hao & Zhang 2011, ApJ, 733, L27)
However, complication actually comes in with active regions….
NOAA 10940
(Feb 1, 2007)
by SP/Hinode
Strong (umbra) and weak (penumbra) fields
show opposite helicity signs.
(Hao & Zhang 2011, ApJ, 733, L27)
How to understand this
hemispheric helicity sign rule and
its solar cycle variation?
Example: Making use of Dynamo models
Hemispheric helicity sign rule shows up clearly in magnetic helicity density map.
Current helicity does
show cycle variation,
with opposite-sign
patches presenting.
Bφ
A Convective Babcock-Leighton Dynamo Model (Miesch & Brown 2012)
hm
hc
(More analysis in progress)
12
=> Magnetic helicity is accumulating
in the corona !
1. Hemispheric helicity
sign rule
2. Berger (1984)’s
conservation law
In the corona:
(Image credit: A. Pevtsov)
13
What are the
consequences of magnetic
helicity accumulation
in the corona?
Consequences of helicity accumulation (1):
Formation of Flux Ropes in the Corona
Taylor relaxation (1972): Turbulent reconnections take place to relax the
field to Woltjer minimum-energy state under helicity conservation.
As a result of Taylor relaxation, magnetic flux ropes will form in the corona, as long as enough total magnetic helicity has been transported into the corona.
(Zhang & Low 2003, ApJ, 584, 479)
15
Nonlinear force-free field calculations indicate that there may be an upper bound on the total magnetic helicity that force-free fields can contain.
(Zhang, Flyer & Low 2006, ApJ, 644, 575)
Consequences of helicity accumulation (2):
CME takes place
16
The existence of total magnetic
helicity upper bound means
Expulsion becomes
unavoidable.
The essence of helicity bound:
The azimuthal field needs confinement that is provided by the anchored poloridal field. Certain amount of poloridal flux can only confine a certain amount of toroidal flux.
(Zhang, Flyer & Low 2006, ApJ, 644, 575)
17
Helicity bound: Compare with observations
Our upper bound (for dipolar boundary): 0.35 Φp2
Observations: 0.2 – 0.4 Φp2 (Demoulin 2007 in a review)
Boundary condition:
18
• The upper bound of total magnetic helicity (HR/Φp2) of multipolar fields
is 10 times smaller. Explain why complicated regions easier to erupt.(Zhang & Flyer 2008, ApJ, 683, 1160 )
~ 0.2 Φp2 (bipolar)
~ 0.035 Φp2 (multipolar)
• The upper bound of total magnetic helicity depends on boundary condition. --- Understand those flux-emergence-triggered or other boundary-variation-associated CMEs.
Consequences of helicity accumulation (3):
flux-emergence can trigger CME
19
However, helicity accumulation is still important.
(for boundary variation to trigger CMEs)
91% of 189 CME-source regions are found to have small-scale flux emergence, whereas the same percentage of small-scale flux emergence is identified in active regions during periods with no solar surface activity.
This means that flux emergence alone is not a sufficient condition to trigger CMEs.
(Zhang Yin et al. 2008, Sol. Phys., 250, 75)
20
1. Why CME takes place? • Because the corona has accumulated enough total
magnetic helicity for the eruption.
2. Why occasionally, not continuously?• Because the corona needs time to accumulate enough total
magnetic helicity for the eruption.
3. Why erupts from previously closed regions?• Because this is where magnetic helicity can be
accumulated.
4. Why initiation often associates with surface field variations such as flux emergence?• Because for the changed boundary condition the helicity
upper bound may be reduced, making the already accumulated total helicity exceeding the new upper bound.
Understanding CMEs in terms of magnetic helicity accumulation:
21
In the interplanetary space
With more helicity (increasing the index n), the field becomes fully opened up, forming a current sheet at the equator.
(Zhang, Flyer & Low 2012, ApJ, 755, 78)
22
The field presents
Parker-spiral-like
structures in the
interplanetary space, to
accommodate the large
amount of magnetic
helicity released from
low corona.
(Zhang, Flyer & Low 2012, ApJ, 755, 78)
(Field lines with θ=0.5o, 1o, 2o, 20o above the equator. )
(Purple: self-similar; Blue: Aly. )
23
1. Hemispheric helicity sign rule is observed on the photosphere.
• In both global Sun and active regions.
• The rule shows solar cycle variation in sunspots.
2. Dynamo models (at least some of them) produce magnetic field consistent with the observed rule.
• Magnetic helicity better preserved than current helicity.
3. The accumulation of magnetic helicity in the corona
• Can give rise to flux ropes in the corona.
• Result in CME as a natural product of coronal evolution.
4. When helicity is dumped into the interplanetary space
• Parker-spiral-like structures will form.
Concluding Remarks
24
1. Hemispheric helicity sign rule is observed on the photosphere.
• In both global Sun and active regions.
• The rule shows solar cycle variation in sunspots.
2. Dynamo models (at least some of them) produce magnetic field consistent with the observed rule.
• Magnetic helicity better preserved than current helicity.
Measure by SP/Hinode etc.
3. The accumulation of magnetic helicity in the corona
• Can give rise to flux ropes in the corona.
• Result in CME as a natural product of coronal evolution.
4. When helicity is dumped into the interplanetary space
• Parker-spiral-like structures will form.
Measure (or monitor) by coronal magnetism?
Concluding Remarks
25
Thank you for your attention!
Huairou Solar Observing Station, NAOC
26
We try to understand this by studying families of nonlinear force-free fields.
Force-free: Because the corona is very tenuous, the large-scale field is usually regarded as force-free.
Boundary condition:
Governing equation:
A family: With the same boundary condition and a specific n, different γ values give fields with different magnetic energy and total magnetic helicity.
(in Zhang et al. 2006)
27
• The central part of the field (flux rope) becomes exceeding kink instability criteria in the process of helicity accumulation.
(Zhang & Flyer 2008, ApJ, 683, 1160 )
Consequence of helicity accumulation (4):
~ 0.2 Φp2 (bipolar)
~ 0.035 Φp2 (multipolar)
Eruptions by kink
instability and by
exceeding helicity
upper bound do not
exclude each other.
(Even the field is allowed to relax to its
minimum-energy state, it cannot relax to
a potential field!)
Woltjer (1958) Theorem:
E 0H Epot
Consequences of Helicity Accumulation (6):
This implies a storage of a “flare un-releasable” magnetic energy,
increasing with the increasingly accumulated total magnetic helicity.
This is the energy that corona stores uniquely for CMEs!
Magnetic Energy Storage as a natural product of coronal evolution
(Zhang & Low 2005, ARAA, 43, 103)
E = E – Epot=(E - 0H )+( )+( 0H - -
Epot)
29
Can we monitor the evolution of magnetic helicity and use it to predict the eruption of CMEs?
In principle: Yes, by observing the photosphere…
--- We can calculate the helicity transfer rate on the photosphere to monitor the helicity accumulation in the corona.
--- We can estimate the helicity upper bound corresponding to current boundary flux distribution.
For space weather?
However, needs to fight for accuracy (of vector magnetic field measurement etc.) and speed (of upper bound calculation).
3030
Example : Calibrating MDI magnetograms
using SP/Hinode observations
1 、 Compared to
SP/Hionde
observations , MDI also
underestimates magnetic
flux, for both 2007 and 2008
calibration versions.
2 、 2008 version has
successfully removed the
center-to-limb variation,
whereas 2007 version did
not.(Wang Dong et al., 2009, Solar Physics, 260, 233)