1
Improving Public Financial Management:
The Role of Analytic Instruments
Presentation to ICGFM Conference
Miami, 2 April, 2003 David Shand and Parminder Brar
The World [email protected]@worldbank.org
2
THE IMPORTANCE OF SOUND PFM Need for accountability to citizens (and
donors) Need for pro-poor budgets – and which are
implemented Good PFM reduces corruption, poor PFM
facilitates it Concern with good PFM should be with - all ministers, not just Minister of Finance - all ministry heads, not just Finance
Ministry - all program managers, not just finance
staff
3
WORLD BANK’S WORK ON PFM Central place of PFM in Bank’s dialogue with most
borrowing countries Substantial growth of Bank’s PFM work Part of public sector reform – can we reform PFM
separately? Changes in Bank’s business – growth of adjustment
lending, debt relief and sector programs Less emphasis on “ring fenced” PFM systems (“islands
of excellence in a sea of failure”) more on country PFM systems
“Integrated Fiduciary Assessment” proposed as future pre-requisite for all budget support lending
Growth of Bank’s involvement with sub-national governments
4
OBJECTIVES OF PFM ANALYTICAL TOOLS
Importance of development as well as fiduciary objectives - complementary not opposites
Best fiduciary assurance comes from a government committed to a sound PFM system
Risk is to country (and other donor) funds as well as Bank funds
These tools are not audits, or seeking to trace individual transactions
or a “pass/fail” certification of adequacy of the PFM system for budget support lending
5
OBJECTIVES - (cont’d) Rather a knowledge tool about the environment
into which Bank funds are going Going into lending operations with “eyes open” Influencing decisions on amount, timing and form
(budget support, sectoral support, investment projects) of lending
Budget support lending may be appropriate in a weak PFM environment where there is clear government commitment to PFM improvement – and evidence of improvements
Improved PFM may therefore be an outcome of or a precondition for adjustment lending
6
PFM AS AN INTEGRATED SYSTEM
Budget development – comprehensiveness, realism, classification, processes
Budget execution and monitoring – internal controls, FMIS, cash and debt management
External fiscal reporting and transparency Internal and external auditing Legislative scrutiny of budget execution Problems in budget execution may reflect
problems in budget construction – can’t implement well a badly constructed budget
7
PFM Diagnostic Tools Variety of PFM diagnostic instruments World Bank – - Country Financial Accountability Assessment
(CFAA) - Public Expenditure Review (PER) - Country Procurement Assessment Report (CPAR) IMF Fiscal Transparency Assessment (Fiscal ROSC) Joint Bank/Fund HIPC Expenditure Tracking
Assessments – 15 PFM benchmarks EC assessments of country financial management UNDP Contact
8
Collaboration with Development partners
Over half of current CFAAs being undertaken in collaboration with other development partners – IADB, DFID, SPA, EC, Netherlands, SIDA, NORAD etc.
Reflecting the international harmonization agenda Interest of other donors in using CFAA for their own
decisions on budget support But different donors will have different thresholds for
this Collaboration may reduce transaction costs to countries,
but poses management and quality challenges. Too many cooks ?
Collaboration should also improve diagnostic quality and increase likelihood of country addressing PFM problems
9
Donor Collaboration – Sharing of diagnostic work plans and
needs Open and participatory reviews – results
widely shared, “no surprises” Rationalize scope, timing and conduct
of diagnostic reviews Many possible forms of collaboration –
depends on country context. Possible “lead agency” approach
10
Involving the Country Strong country participation desirable to build
country commitment to PFM reforms. Continuous consultation - “no surprises”. A general diagnostics issue.
Risk is to country as well as Bank funds – persuading the country ? Hard to improve “by force”.
Various levels of country participation; in practice Bank generally “holds the pen”
Involvement of key officials; may undertake some of diagnosis
Collaboration among development partners facilitates country participation (although claims of “ganging up”)
11
PFM FOLLOW UP Need to increase Bank understanding of and skills in
capacity development And working collaboratively with other donors and the country PFM improvements as a condition for further lending or as
components of PS Reform loans Need for regular performance measurement of PFM – is
progress being made But measurement of progress within a country is more
important; hard to compare different countries Agreement with other donors and country on harmonized
performance indicators
12
A National Perspective: India Are expenditure outcomes being
achieved?
Aggregate fiscal discipline Prioritization of expenditures Operational efficiency Transparency – processes and information
13
National Perspective: Budget Formulation:Unrealistic revenue
forecasts have resulted in unachievable fiscal deficit targets.
Office of the Controller General of Accounts, Ministry of Finance-Improving Financial ManagementGOI’sReceipt and Expenditure Trends and Cash Management. FY 02-03. March 2003.
4
GOI'sReceipts, Expenditure and Deficit
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
Rs. C
r.
Total Receipts 134,275 143,131 166,017 193,368 206,796 221,499 258,547 285,158
Total Expenditure 201,007 232,068 279,366 298,084 325,611 362,453 404,013 438,795
Fiscal Deficit 66,732 88,937 113,349 104,717 118,815 140,954 145,466 153,637
1996/97 1997-98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 (RE) 03/04 (BE)
+14,703+13,428
+27,350
+36,842+27,527
+18,718
+47,298
+31,060
+41,560
+37,048
+22,886+8,856
+34,782
+26,611
14
National Perspective: Budget Execution:Focus remains on
meeting spending targets instead of outputs or outcomes.
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
Apl May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
Rs
. Cr.
Plan (Developmental) Non-Plan (Non Developmental)
15
National Perspective Fiscal Reform is at the top of the agenda for many governments.
State Fiscal Reform Facility (2000-01 – 2004-05): Incentive Fund established to encourage states to improve fiscal discipline.
Releases from the fund require a five percentage point reduction in the revenue deficit as a proportion to the State’s total revenue receipts in each year till 2004-05.
States are required to draw up a Medium Term Fiscal Reform Program (MTFRP) which aims to bring down the fiscal deficit, eliminate the revenue deficit by 2005 and reduce the debt – GDP ratio, including contingent liabilities. MTFRP’s drawn up by 16 states.
There is a community of interest in improving PFM systems.
16
Diagnosis: Dialogue on PFM issues is increasing:
April 2000 – March 2002: 4 WB structural adjustment loans released for fiscal reform in
Uttar Pradesh (pop. 166 m.) Karnataka (pop.53 m.) and Andhra Pradesh (pop. 76 m.).
February 2001: IMF Fiscal Rosc April 2002: CGA / MoF Conference on Financial
Reforms May 2002: IMF Data Rosc initiated By July 03: Four SFAA’s due for delivery June 2003: Regional Conference of CGA’s
17
Results: Karnataka:
Improved Aggregate Fiscal Management: MTFP being updated annually. Fiscal Responsibility Act enacted – binds state to achieve fiscal deficit of 3% by 2005-06.
Increased performance orientation: Departmental MTFP’s completed in 5 departments - being rolled out to other departments.
Budget simplification: Object heads reduced by 50%. Systems Modernization: 220 Treasuries and Sub Treasuries
computerized. New accounting system introduced in biggest urban local body. Improved transparency: First state to publish monthly accounts
on the web.Right to Information Act enacted along with Transparency in Public Procurement Act.
Improved response to Audit.
18
Results: Andhra Pradesh:
Improved Aggregate fiscal management: MTFP being updated annually.
Hard budget ceiling on departments.Line departments given much more flexibility to to prioritize expenditures within ceiling limits. Performance budgeting systems evolving.
Cash management system vastly improved.Significant decrease in use of overdrafts.
Incentives provided to improve collection of user charges. Systems modernization : Integrated Financial Information System
being introduced. Codes and regulations being updated. Internal Audit introduced in Government, with assistance provided
by Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Monitoring and enforcement of internal controls improved. Self Diagnosis: SFAA being prepared by the Government.
19
The Way Forward:
Country leadership Strong Partnership Results focus
Top Related