09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING DISCOVERY OF EXPERT WITNESSES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Theodore B. Olson, SBN 38137 [email protected] Matthew D. McGill, pro hac vice Amir C. Tayrani, SBN 229609 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 955-8668, Facsimile: (202) 467-0539 Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., SBN 132009 [email protected] Christopher D. Dusseault, SBN 177557 Ethan D. Dettmer, SBN 196046 Sarah E. Piepmeier, SBN 227094 Theane Evangelis Kapur, SBN 243570 Enrique A. Monagas, SBN 239087 333 S. Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 229-7804, Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies, pro hac vice [email protected] Theodore H. Uno, SBN 248603 333 Main Street, Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200, Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO,
Plaintiffs, v.
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; and DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY OF EXPERT WITNESSES
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document196 Filed09/22/2009 Page1 of 12
1 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING DISCOVERY OF EXPERT WITNESSES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Plaintiffs Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo
(“Plaintiffs”), Plaintiff-Intervenor City and County of San Francisco (“Plaintiff-Intervenor”),
Defendant-Intervenors Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight,
Martin F. Gutierrez, Hak-Shing William Tam, and Mark A. Jansson; and ProtectMarriage.com –
Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal (“Defendant-Intervenors”), and Defendants Arnold
Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Mark B. Horton, Linette Scott, Patrick O’Connell, and
Dean C. Logan (“Defendants”) (collectively the “Parties”), through their respective counsel of record,
hereby stipulate to the following regarding the scope of discovery concerning expert witnesses in
this matter:
1. The Parties stipulate and agree that no Party is entitled to discover the contents of
communications that involve counsel for any Party and any retained expert or outside consultant,
whether such expert or outside consultant is serving as a testifying or non-testifying expert;
2. Further, the Parties stipulate and agree that no Party is entitled to discover the contents
of drafts of expert witness disclosures or reports prepared in relation to Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure Rule 26(a)(2);
3. Nothing in this stipulation limits in any way the right of either party to discover and
examine the basis for a testifying expert’s opinion or conclusion, the data or other information
considered by the Outside Consultant in forming the opinion or conclusion, and any other
information subject to discovery under Rule 26(a)(2); and
4. This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and facsimile signatures are deemed
originals for all purposes.
///
///
///
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document196 Filed09/22/2009 Page2 of 12
2 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING DISCOVERY OF EXPERT WITNESSES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
DATED: September 16, 2009 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By: /s/ Christopher D. Dusseault
and
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
David Boies
Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO
DATED: September 10, 2009 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
By: /s/ Ronald Flynn
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
DATED: September 10, 2009 COOPER AND KIRK, PLLC
By: /s/ David Thompson
Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS; and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM – YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL
DATED: September 16, 2009 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
By: /s/ Tamar Pachter
Attorneys for Defendant ATTORNEY GENERAL EDMUND G. BROWN, JR.
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document196 Filed09/22/2009 Page3 of 12
3 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING DISCOVERY OF EXPERT WITNESSES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
DATED: September 16, 2009 MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP
By: /s/ Kenneth C. Mennemeier
Attorneys for Defendants ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARK B. HORTON, and LINETTE SCOTT (the “Administration Defendants”)
DATED: September 10, 2009 THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
By: /s/ Claude F. Kolm, Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendant PATRICK O’CONNELL, Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda
DATED: September 10, 2009 THE OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL
By: /s/ Judy Whitehurst
Attorneys for Defendant DEAN C. LOGAN, Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:_____________________ ______________________________________
HON. VAUGHN R. WALKER United States District Chief Judge
September 22, 2009
UN
ITED
STATES DISTRICT COU
RT
NO
RT
H
ERN DISTRICT OF CALI
FOR
NIA
IT IS SO ORDERED
Judge Vaughn R Walker
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document196 Filed09/22/2009 Page4 of 12
4 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING DISCOVERY OF EXPERT WITNESSES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45
Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the Northern District of California, I attest that concurrence
in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories to this document.
By: /s/ Enrique A. Monagas Enrique A. Monagas
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document196 Filed09/22/2009 Page5 of 12
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
DATED: September &, 2009 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
and
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
David Boies
Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO
DATED: S e p t e m b e r , 2009 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
By: Ronald Flynn
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
DATED: S e p t e m b e r , 2009 COOPER AND KIRK, PLLC
By: David Thompson
Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS; and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL
DATED: S e p t e m b e r , 2009 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Y Y ' Tamar Pachter
Attorneys for Defendant ATTORNEY GENERAL EDMUND G. BROWN, JR.
2 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING DISCOVERY OF EXPERT WITNESSES
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document196 Filed09/22/2009 Page6 of 12
DATED:
DATED:
DATED:
1
~ e ~ t e m b e r 1 0 , 2 0 0 9
September -, 2009
DATED: September -, 2009 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
September -, 2009
By: Christopher D. Dusseault
and
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
David Boies
Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
By: Ronald Flynn
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
COOPER AND KIRK. PLLC
By: David Thompson
Attornevs for Defendant-Intervenors PROPO'SITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS; and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
By: Tamar Pachter
Attorneys for Defendant ATTORNEY GENERAL EDMUND G. BROWN, JR
GlbSO". Dun" 8 Cwtchei LLP
2 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING DISCOVERY OF EXPERT WITNESSES
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document196 Filed09/22/2009 Page7 of 12
DATED: Septeambcr ~*-, ,, 2009 GIBSOS, DVNN & CRUTGII'ER LI,P
At%orneys far PXaintifls KWfS7'IN M. P E M Y , SAiWR4 B. S*I."IER, PAldL T, Ks?iTi%le4l, and JEFFREY J. ZARRII,I.O
DATED: Sepker~aber -- ", 2009 Qf;l21CE OF "TI.-IE CITY tlTTORNEY
Attorneys for Plainti fGXntcnfenor CITY AND CfjUNTY OF SAX FMMCXSGO
,4E~meys lor Defendm%=la%c~.~tgn~~s PROPe;tSITfOX 8 OFFECtAl, PROP06.Jti%'rS; and PROTECThfARRIAGE.COM -- YES 0% 8, A PROJECT OI: CAL,IFBmZA R E S E WAS,
ill)/Yf*!il>: Sej3tcrrz$rr, 2009 CBFFlf E OF TEIE i"r'lVPORNiiY GGNERAI,
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document196 Filed09/22/2009 Page8 of 12
Glbsm, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
DATED: S e p t e m b e r , 2009 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By: Christopher D. Dusseault
and
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
David Boies
Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO
DATED: S e p t e m b e r , 2009 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
By: Ronald Fly-nn
Attorneys for PIaintiff-Intervenor CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
DATED: S e p t e m b e r , 2009 COOPER AND KIRK, PLLC
By: David Thompson
Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors PROPOSITTON 8 OFFICLAL PROPONENTS; and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - Y E S ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL
DATED: ~ e ~ t e t n b e r &, 2009 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Attorneys for Defendant ATTORNEY GENERAL EDMUND G. BROWN, JR.
2 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDTNG DISCOVERY OF EXPERT WITNESSES
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document196 Filed09/22/2009 Page9 of 12
DATED: Srptcniber k2 2009 r"vlEl.iXE122E1ER~ CLASS&f>th' cRc S'I'RO UD LLP
By:
.&ttornc_ts k ~ r Defe~~ciai~ts AKNC?I,,Cl SCI T't3rAIU-ENEGGER, MARK R. HOR'X'OX, ad LmE'T'IE SCOT?' (rhe "'hcixninist~a~ion X>cf*enda~ats")
D-U'EW: September -, 2009 'I-PIE OFFICL: OF 'PHE CO LTN'I'Y C3X) UNSEX.,
Attorneys for Defei~daz~t XStlTl;tXCK B'CONKlil'I,I,, Clerk-Recorder far tIzc County ur" Almecfa
12 DATED: September -, 2009 ?'MJ:.I OFFICE OF COUNTY t,<')ll.lYSEX,
13
Ilatcd: - - a-w --.*- ", *.,..-- - - -- WON, VAISGIXX R."WA~,KT+R Xjxtilcd Sttldcs Disirict Chief Jtrdgr
3 P
159-@Y-2292 Vt;'ktW S11X'UL4rtTI"IOhT AND {Pft,QPOSEDj ORDER REGARDIXC I31SCQVERY Qt' EXfaEKY a;i"lT&XSSES
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document196 Filed09/22/2009 Page10 of 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
l i
15
1s
2(
2 1
2;
2:
2 L
2:
2t
2;
21
Glbson, Dunn: c m e , LIP
PAGE 212 TRC
DATED: September. 2009 MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP
S E P .
I
I
I
I
: 1
1
!
i
I
!
)
I
$
h
:VD
By: Kenneth C. Mememeier
1 0 . 2 0 0 9 9 : 5 0 A M
A
Attorneys for Defendants ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARK B. HORTON, and LMETTE SCOTT (the "Administration Defendants")
DATED: ~eptcmber& 2009 THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
By: Claude F. Kolm, Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendant PATRICK O'CONNELL, Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda
DATED: September, 2009 THE OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL
By: Judy Whitehunt
Attorneys for Defendant DEAN C. LOGAN, RecorderlCounty Clerk for the County of Los Angeles
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STZPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:, HON. VAUGHN R. WALKER United States Diskkt Chief Judge
100725508-1 (2009-09-09 Stipulation re expaa) (A).DOC
09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION ANL) [PROPOSED] ORDER T I C P . ~ T I ~ ~ T E ~ T O ~ X T C T I V ne rve.cer nnnmocac
T 911012009 9:53:20 AM [Pacific Daylight Time] ~VR:LA_FAXO110 VNIS:6520 YSlD:5102126841 VURATION (mmmss):O1mOO
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document196 Filed09/22/2009 Page11 of 12
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
DATED: September -3 2009 MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP
By: Kenneth C. Mennemeier
Attorneys for Defendants ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARK B. HORTON, and LINETTE SCOTT (the "Administration Defendants")
DATED: S e p t e m b e r , 2009 THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
By: Lindsey Stern
Attorneys for Defendant PATRICK O'CONNELL, Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alarneda
DATED: September By 2009 THE OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL
w Attorneys for Defendant DEAN C. LOGAN, RecorderICounty Clerk for the County of Los Angeles
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: HON. VAUGHN R. WALKER United States District Chief Judge
100725508-1 (2009-09-09 Stipulation re experts) (4).DOC
3 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING DISCOVERY OF EXPERT WITNESSES
Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document196 Filed09/22/2009 Page12 of 12
Top Related