How would feminists respond to the portrayal of women in these 007 clips?

Conclusion:Answer the question being asked.In conclusion feminists would hate James Bond because2. Make it distinctive!

Feminist theories are applicable to not just to everyday life but also to the film industry. Feminism is the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes. Sexism isprejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex. A key feminist is Germaine Greer Freedom is fragile and must be protected. To sacrifice it, even as a temporary measure, is to betray it.

In the first clip, fromSkyfall, a damsel in distress image is apparent. The character of Severine is tied to a post, sexually harassed, and appears helpless and this is emphasised by having strong male bodyguards and confident male characters. Despite her being in distress the actress has a lot of make-up on, showing the aim was to create a sultry effect. Feminists would see this as an issue because, although Severine is captured, she is still looking after the men sexually. They would regard the different positions of poweras a status issue; men having a higher status as women, and abusing their power by harassing and abusing Severine.

In the second clip, where Silva is reunited with M, the themes of power and control are explored. M is very powerful, she commands bodyguards and speaks with conviction. However, Silva is on a raised platform, suggesting he is of greater importance than the character of M; although M may have lawful power over him, he can still dominate her. The physical appearance of M is very masculine, sheis fully attired in the stereotypical old, dull woman fashion. This suggests that it is impossible for women to be attractive and intellectual. Feminists would consider the dominance of M as sexism as it implies a woman can never have full command.

In the third clip,Vesper dominated James Bond mentally, verbally and sexually I am the money. It contradicts with the presentation of M in the previous clip. This is because Vesper is both brainy and attractive; thus intimidating bond. However, male dominance is evident by Bonds pouring of wine, which may imply Bond wants to get her drunk because he is taken by her intelligence in conversation, or that he is being courteous and traditional. Feminists would have a problem with this because it suggests that although Vesper is strong, her male counterpart is not taking her entirely seriously; but as the scene comes to an end it is apparent Vesper has the upper hand.

I think youre a sexist misogynist dinosaur are Ms grand words in clip four, which is from Goldeneye. Straight away her confidence is asserted by her pouring her own drink, unlike the other clip. The character of Ms direct nature is enforced by the lines You dont like me bond. Feminists would like this because it doesnt show one gender dominating or being overtly rude to the other it just shows two people being very frank and confident in themselves.The character of M is not beautiful. Although feminists would have a problem with this, I consider them wrong here. If M was more attractive feminists would say that she is being clothed and presented to impress a male audience and I consider beauty and appearances to be pale in comparison to intelligence and wit, which M has. However, Bond is rarely presented as sensitive he has nerves of steel. Although not all men are of a sensitive character, the films representation of men are of strength and confidence. Feminists would have a problem with this because it adheres almost embarrassingly to gender roles. Considering the suicide rate is much greater amongst men as it amongst women, I think the film industry should make a greater effort to display a wider scope of humanity and human emotions.