Zarzosa Valdivia Fernando and Pentecost Eric
description
Transcript of Zarzosa Valdivia Fernando and Pentecost Eric
AN EXPLORATION OF THE INTERDEPENDENCIES BETWEEN THE REAL EXCHANGE RATE AND
THE SIZE OF THE TRADABLE SECTOR IN A SMALL OPEN
ECONOMYZarzosa Valdivia Fernando and Pentecost Eric
Arnoldshain Seminar XI, University of Antwerp 2013
CONTENT Introduction: An Australian Model focused on the
structural real exchange rate (SRER=PT/PN) (and the economic structure?)
Microfounded Model: Assumptions SRER and the Tradable goods share in GDP
(Tshare): Inter-relationships and equilibrium relationships
Effects of exogenous shocks on the SRER and Tshare
Conclusions
INTRODUCTION: AN AUSTRALIAN MODEL
T
N
A
IA
0
SRERA
=
PT/PN
PPF
TA
NA
Salter-Swan Model:
Fundamentals: SRER-Ec. Structure
• TFPX, TFPM, TFPN
• K-L
• TT
• DS (debtss-transfers)
MICROFOUNDED MODEL: ASSUMPTIONS
Rational economic agents, CES Pref, Cobb-Douglas T, Linear N
Three goods: two tradable goods (Primary and Manufacturing) and one non-tradable goods
Two factors with a constant endowment: labour and capital Perfect factor mobility between sectors Exogenous debt service (interest payments) and transfers
to GDP, Exogenous terms of trade Perfectly competitive goods and factor markets
SRER AND TSHARES
0 Tshare
SRER
SRER0 E0
Tshare0
TshareC
, ,( ) ( )
DS DST TSRER d Tshare d DS
Larger Tshare, creates an excess supply of T excess demand for N, SRER
must diminish to switch expenditure from N-T and restore eq CA, Nmkt
SRER AND TSHARES
0 Tshare
SRER
SRER0 E0
TshareP
Tshare0
( ) ( )
ˆ ˆ (1 )
X M NX M X M
L K TT X TT M
d Tshare TFP TFP SRER TFP
L K TT
X M X MP X P M P X P MTshareGDP wL rK
SRER AND TSHARES
0 Tshare
SRER
SRER0 E0
TshareP
Tshare0
TshareC
, ,( ) ( )
DS DST TSRER d Tshare d DS
( ) ( )
ˆ ˆ (1 )
X M NX M X M
L K TT X TT M
d Tshare TFP TFP SRER TFP
L K TT
SRER AND TSHARES
0 Tshare
SRER
SRER0 E0
TshareP
Tshare0
TshareC
, ,( ) ( )
DS DST TSRER d Tshare d DS
( ) ( )
ˆ ˆ (1 )
X M NX M X M
L K TT X TT M
d Tshare TFP TFP SRER TFP
L K TT
Neary and Purvis (82)
Rodrik (2008) and
van der Ploeg (2010,2011)
SectorProductivity
TransfersDevelopment
Models
SRER AND THE TSHARE RESPONSES TO SHOCKS
Exogenous shocks Linkages
Variables
Sector TFP shocksFactor
endowmentsTerms of
trade
Debt service minus
transfersPrimary Manu-
facturingNon-
tradables
TFPX TFPM TFPN L K TT DS SRER Tshare
SRER + -Tshare + + + - - ?+ +SRER - - + + + ?- +Tshare + + - - - ?+ +Xshare + - - ? ? + +Mshare - + - ? ? - +The first two rows correspond to the relationships of the TshareC and TshareP lines, respectivelyThe third and fourth row are the equilibrium relationshipsThe last two rows shows the response of the equilibrium share in GDP of the primary and manufacturing sectors to exogenous shocksA “+” indicates a positive effect, a “-” a negative one and a “?” an ambiguous effect; signs in subscripts are valid relationships when TT improvements appreciate the SRER
Dutch Disease
SRER, TSHARE AND TFPX
0Tshare(=θT
)
SRER
θT0
SRER0
TshareP
E0
θTd0
TshareC
d X M
X M N
P X P MTshareP X P M P N
θTd0 T X M T X M T( ) (1 ) (1 )d
X M Nd Tshare TFP TFP TFP TT SRER
SRER, TSHARE AND TFPX
0
E01
Tshare(=θT
)
SRER
θT0
SRER0
TshareP
(TFPX0)
EPE+
E0 E02
θT01 θT02θT1
SRER1
RME+
θTd0
(X0)
E1
θTd01
(X01)
θTP
(TFPX1)
TFPX1 >TFPX0
SE-TE+
TshareC
01 0 (1 )XX X TFP
d X M
X M N
P X P MTshareP X P M P N
θTd0
is derived from
SRER, TSHARE AND FACTOR ENDOWMENTS (L)
0
SRER
θT02
SRER0
TshareP(L1)
E02
E0
θT0θT1
SRER1
RME-
θTd0
E1 TshareP(L0)
L1 >L0
SE+ TE-
TshareC
Tshare(=θT
)
SRER, TSHARE AND TERMS OF TRADE (TT)
0
E01’
Tshare(=θT)
SRER
θT0
SRER0
TshareP
(TT0)
EPE+
E0
E02
θT01 θT02θT01’
SRER01
E1
TshareP
(TT1) case
(a)
TT1 >TT0
RME+
SE-TE+
E01
PE+
θT1
SRER1
TshareC
θTd0
(TT0)
E02’
E1’
θT02’θT1’
RME-SE-
TE-
TshareP
(TT1) case (b)
Case (a)
Case (b)
SRER1’
SRER, TSHARE AND DEBT SERVICES-TRANSFERS (DS)
0
E1
Tshare(=θT)
SRER
θT1
SRER0
E0SRER1
E02
θT0
DS1 < DS0
θT02
TshareP
TshareC
(DS0)
TshareC
(DS1)
EME-
SuE+ SE-=TE-
θTd0
EFFECTS OF EXOGENOUS SHOCKS IN AN ECONOMY
Extraordinary Profits effects
Price effects
Resource Movement
effects
Expenditure Movement
Effect
Substitution Effects
Spending effects
Total Effects
Tradable share SRER
TFPX + + - + Inc. App.
TFPM + + - + Inc. App.
TFPN - - + - Dim. Dep.
TT + ++ - + Inc. App.
- + - Dim. Dep.
DS + - + + Inc. Dep.
A plus (minus) indicates that the corresponding shock increases (decreases) the tradable shareInc. and Dim. indicates that the tradable share increases or diminishes, respectivelyApp. and Dep. refer to appreciation and depreciation, respectively
CONCLUSIONS
Theoretically: SRER, Tshares are simultaneous determined
Role of Fundamentals: TFPs, L-K, TT, DS; ∆TT and ▼DS may give rise to the Dutch Disease
Measuring resource allocation as the change in the Tshare, the EPE, PE, EME, RME, SuE, SE of exogenous shocks are identified and distinguished
THANK YOUBEDANKT!
AN AUSTRALIAN MODEL: TFPT
T
N
A
IA
0
SRERC
SRERA
SRERA
PPF
PPF’
B
C
TA TB TD
IB
NA =NB
TC
DND
NC
AN AUSTRALIAN MODEL: EFFECTS
T
N
A
IA
0
SRERC
SRERA
SRERA
PPF
PPF’
B
C
TA TB TD
IA
NA =NB
TC
DND
NC
EPE RME
SE
TE
NC N
T*
T T
N N
P SPSRERP P
TC
Structural real exchange rate (SRER)
*T TP SP
Universidad
Nacional de Córdoba
NC N
T*
T T
N N
P SPSRERP P
TC
SRER and RERPPP
**PPP
SP SRERRER fP SRER
Domestic
ForeignGoods
exogenous
Theoretical Microfounded Model: Main Relationships
Producers assumptions
Consumers Assumption
No consumersdecisions
Consumers: CES Preferences
Determinants Cobb-Douglaspreferences
No producers decisions
T and N goods are endowed SRER model only
Goods endowments, TT, CAMRDF
Goods endowmentvariations equal to sector
TFPs changesSRER model only Sector TFPs, TT,
CAMRDF
Producers
Cobb-Douglas technology in the T sectors
Linear technology in the N sector
SRER model only (assuming
constant Tradable shares)
Sector TFPs, factor
endowments, TT, CAMRDF
Linear technolgoy in the N sector
SRER-Tradableshare
interdependences
Sector TFPs, factor
endowments, TT, CAMRDF
SRER model only (‘variable tradable
share’)
CES technolo-gy in the N sector
Flexible RFPs
SRER-RFPsinterdependences
plus SRER-Tradable shares
interdependences
Sector TFPs, factor
endowments, TT, CAMRDF
SRER-RFPsinterdependences
RFPs Rigidities
SRER-uinterdependences
plus SRER-Tradable shares
interdependences
Sector TFPs, capital
endowments, TT, CAMRDF
SRER-u interdependences
T= Tradable goods (sector), N= Non-tradable goods (sector), SRER= Structural real exchange rate, RFP= Relative factor prices, u= unemployment rate, TFP= Total factor productivity, TT= terms of trade and CAMRDF= -Debt obligations
ARGENTINA TODAY:
SRER(log(100-u))
0Tshare
SRER
SRER0E0GM
L(SRER)
TshareP
log(100-u)L0
E0GE
Tshare0
TshareC
(SRER)
ProducedRequired
Dollars required to correct
the current account
L1L2
Unemployment
expected
12
Real Depreciation required (▼PN or devaluation) or Productivity, Inv, ▼ gov.spending that falls in non-tradables
ˆ ˆ ˆ* 0
ˆ 0ˆˆ 0
PPPRER S P P
SRERP S
A212
SRER1
ARGENTINA TODAY:
SRER(log(100-u))
0Tshare
SRER
SRER0E0GM
L(SRER)
TshareP
log(100-u)L0
E0GE
Tshare0
TshareC
(SRER)
ProducedRequired
Dollars required to correct
the current account
L1L2
Unemployment
expected
12
Real Depreciation required (▼PN or devaluation) or Productivity, Inv, ▼ gov.spending that falls in non-tradables
Aggravate
US$: reserve
ˆ ˆ ˆ* 0
ˆ 0ˆˆ 0
PPPRER S P P
SRERP S