Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 11 ILS Z556 1.
-
Upload
aldous-mccarthy -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 11 ILS Z556 1.
Evaluating Alternative Designs
Provide clients with some alternatives:
Expensive …. Inexpensive
Short-term …. Long-term
Evaluating Alternative Designs
Consistent with Strategic Plan
Available Funds
Schedule and Resources
TechnologyRequired
Organizational Culture
Cost-Benefit Analysis
• 1. Identify the problem clearly• 2. Explicitly define the set of objectives
to be accomplished• 3. Generate alternatives that satisfy
the stated objectives• 4. Identify clearly the constraints (e.g.,
technological, political, legal, social, financial
ILS
Z5
56
5
Cost-Benefit Analysis
• 5. Determine and list the benefits and costs associated with each alternative
• 6. Calculate the benefit/cost ratios and other indicators (e.g., present value, payback period) for each alternatives
• 7. Prepare the final report, comparing the results
ILS
Z5
56
6
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Title Budget (Million)
Domestic BO (M)
World BO (M)
The Lord of the Rings: The fellowship of the ring
$109 $313.8 $860.7
The Two Towers $94 $340.5 $920.5
The Return of the king
$94 $377 $1129.2
ILS
Z5
56
7
http://www.the-movie-times.com/thrsdir/alltime.mv?domestic+ByDG
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Title Budget (Million)
Domestic BO (M)
World BO (M)
The Lord of the Rings: The fellowship of the ring
$109 $313.8 $860.7
The Two Towers $94 $340.5 $920.5
The Return of the king
$94 $377 $1129.2
Star Wars $11 $460.9 $797.9
ILS
Z5
56
8
http://www.the-movie-times.com/thrsdir/alltime.mv?domestic+ByDG
Shortcomings of the B/C Methodology• Doesn’t identify the scale of the
projects (ratio only)• Do not assess unquantifiable items in
financial terms• Introduce biases in the approaches to a
problem
ILS
Z5
56
9
Cost-Effectiveness
• Effectiveness:• Value• Worth• Benefit• Utility• Gain• Performance
• Establish criteria & use weight (see Shtub, et al., 1994, Figure 3-3)
ILS
Z5
56
10
Selecting Alternatives (Satzinger, et al., 2009)
• Identifying criteria:• General requirements (Fig. 8-7, p. 308)• Functional requirements (Fig. 8-8, p. 309)• Technical requirements (Fig. 8-9, p. 310)
ILS
Z5
56
11
Requirements Weight (1-5) Option #1 Option #2 Option #2
Raw Extended Raw Extended Raw Extended
Requirements
as determined
by client or
thru analysis
Imp
orta
nce
of
requ
irem
ent
1= lo
w,
5= h
igh
Raw Score = How well option meets requirement. 0-not at all, 1-partially, 2-fully
Extended = Weight X Raw score
Evaluating Alternative Designs
Requirements Weight (1-5) Option #1 Option #2 Option #2
Raw Extended Raw Extended Raw Extended
Total
Staff Comfort
External Support
Quick Release
Expandable
4
2
5
3
1
0
2
0
2
2
1
1
0
2
2
2
4
0
10
0
8
4
5
3
0
4
10
6
14 20 20
Evaluating Alternative Designs
Evaluating Alternative Designs
Positives• Objective – Surprise
Results
• Easy to read & understand
• Can be shared with client
• Modifiable based on client input
Negatives• Subjective weighting
• Must know all requirements
• Lengthy process if one solution is obvious
ILS
Z5
56
14
Risk-payoff Analysis (Yen & Davis, 1999)
• Area 3: advance immediately
• Area 4: do nothing until resources or the expected payoff increases
• Area 1: wait until additional analysis reduces the risk
• Area 2: stop immediately
ILS
Z5
56
15
payoffs
risks
Area 1high payoffhigh risk
Area 3high payofflow risk
Area 2low payoffhigh risk
Area 4low payofflow risk
Risk-Benefit Analysis (Shtub, et al., 1994, p. 134)
• Formulations• Problem (or risk) definition• Value system design• System synthesis
• Analysis• Forecast failures• Optimization and refinement of alternatives
• Interpretation• Decision making• Planning for action• Implementation
ILS
Z5
56
16
Analyzing Forces: Force Field Analysis
• Is a method used to get a whole view of all the forces for or against a plan, so that
• Helps decision making which takes into account all interests.
• Is a specialized method of weighing pros and cons
• Where a plan has been decided on, • FFA allows you to look at all the forces
for or against the plan. • It helps you to plan or reduce the impact
of the opposing forces, and strengthen and reinforce the supporting forces.
ILS
Z5
56
17
Analyzing Forces
• List all forces for change in one column, and all forces against change in another column.
• Assign a score to each force, from 1 (weak) to 5 (strong).
• Draw a diagram showing the forces for and against, and the size of the forces
ILS
Z5
56
19
Information available more quickly
Accuracy and consistency of information
Free up people’s time to do more interesting tasks
Cost of technology
Staff dislike automated processes
Disruption during change
Complicated to implement
TOTAL: 13 TOTAL: 12
Plan: Upgrade company wide
information gathering
process from manual to automated
5
4
4
4
4
2
2
Forces for Change Forces against Change
ILS
Z5
56
21
Forces for Change Forces against Change
Information available more quickly
Accuracy and consistency of information
Free up people’s time to do more interesting tasks
Cost of technology
Staff dislike automated processes
Disruption during change
Complicated to implement
TOTAL: 13 TOTAL: 8
Plan: Upgrade company wide
information gathering
process from manual to automated
5
4
4
3
2
1
2
ILS
Z5
56
22
Eliminates re-keying errors
Online documentation eliminates paper
Reduces need for clerical staff
Managers unhappy with “clerical work
Cost of eliminating clerical staff
Start-up costs
TOTAL: 10 TOTAL: 8
INITIATIVE
Implement a Self-Service HR System
Enables employees to self-manage their personal information,
such as vacation time,
payroll deductions,
benefit participation,
etc.
1
4
3
2
1
1
Forces for Change Forces against Change
Faster execution of administrative work
1
Increases control/auditing capabilities
1
Requires training of more people
2
Some activity costs shift to high-paid staff
2
Rel
ativ
e F
orc
e S
tren
gth
Relative F
orce S
treng
th
ILS
Z5
56
23
Eliminates re-keying errors
Online documentation eliminates paper
Reduces need for clerical staff
Managers unhappy with “clerical work
Cost of eliminating clerical staff
Start-up costs
TOTAL: 15 TOTAL: 7
INITIATIVE
Implement a Self-Service HR System
Enables employees to self-manage their personal information,
such as vacation time,
payroll deductions,
benefit participation,
etc.
3
4
3
2
1
1
Forces for Change Forces against Change
Faster execution of administrative work
3
Increases control/auditing capabilities
2
Requires training of more people
1
Some activity costs shift to high-paid staff
2
Rel
ativ
e F
orc
e S
tren
gth
Relative F
orce S
treng
th
ILS
Z5
56
24