Z mass resolution release 17 Data/MC based on the MC with realistic Rt, A lines and errors
description
Transcript of Z mass resolution release 17 Data/MC based on the MC with realistic Rt, A lines and errors
Z mass resolution release 17Z mass resolution release 17Data/MCData/MC
based on the MC with based on the MC with realistic Rt, A lines and errorsrealistic Rt, A lines and errors
Niels van Eldik, Peter Kluit, Alan Poppleton
Muon week 16 November discussed at MATF 2 November
1
Z mass ID-IDZ mass ID-IDBased on the v35 processing
compared to release 17 Rt + A + Error
2
Z mass CB-CBZ mass CB-CBData MC rel 17 comparisonData MC rel 17 comparison
3
Reasonable agreement additional smearing needed
Z mass CB-CB MuidZ mass CB-CB MuidRt A lines and errorsRt A lines and errors
4
Z mass SA-SAZ mass SA-SAData MC rel 17 comparisonData MC rel 17 comparison
5
Not so good agreement….
Z mass SA-SA MuidZ mass SA-SA MuidRt A lines and errorsRt A lines and errors
6
MS-ID momentumMS-ID momentumData MC comparison: BarrelData MC comparison: Barrel
7
Barrel Large η 1.1 and Small sectors η 1.0Excellent agreement Data/MC
MS-ID momentumMS-ID momentumTransition regionTransition region
8
Transition Large η 1.4 and Small η 1.7 sectorsNot so good agreement with MC: Transition region is worse in data
MS-ID momentum EndcapMS-ID momentum Endcap
9
Endcap rest η range < 2.0 Large and SmallReasonable agreement: small sectors a bit worse than Large
MS-ID momentum CSCMS-ID momentum CSC
10
Endcap rest η range < 2.0 Large and SmallReasonable agreement: small sectors slightly worse
Need More statistics
MS-ID momentum pull MS-ID momentum pull BarrelBarrel
11
Pull distribution agrees very well Data/MC
MS momentum error MS momentum error BarrelBarrel
12
Momentum error distribution for SA track: pretty similar
MS-ID momentum pull MS-ID momentum pull TransitionTransition
13
Not so good agreement in this region (see also dp/p in T region)
MS momentum error MS momentum error TransitionTransition
14
Error distribution SA track is similar Data/MC
MS-ID momentum pull MS-ID momentum pull EndcapEndcap
15
Some small differences e.g. Small Chambers
MS momentum error MS momentum error Endcap Endcap
16
Tendency that error in MC is smaller
MS-ID momentum pull MS-ID momentum pull CSCCSC
17
Reasonable agreement except for Small
MS momentum error CSCMS momentum error CSC
18
Error distribution SA track is different for Data/MC(this is known: due to CSC hit errors. In data there are less unspoiled clusters)
MS-ID momentumMS-ID momentum< 3 station tracks< 3 station tracks
19
ConclusionsConclusions
20
Significant improvement in Data/MC agreement using the simulation including realistic Rt smearing, A lines and errors.
Performed further checks• Mass ID/CB/SA• Comparing dp/p = (pSA – pID) / pID and dp/error• Expected momentum error
• Barrel looks in excellent shape • Transition region: MC is too optimistic in dp/p (p error OK)• Endcap region: 5-10% discrepancy in dp/p; p error a bit too optimistic• CSC region: some discrepancy dp/p. Probably due to the fact that the CSC hit errors are not correctly simulated (in data there are more spoiled clusters)• < 3 station tracks need more smearing Efficiency cross check: MC with/without RtAE lines differ < 0.1%