Yr 12 OCR Nationals – LEVEL 3 Unit 2 – Pointers for success!
-
Upload
corey-miller -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Yr 12 OCR Nationals – LEVEL 3 Unit 2 – Pointers for success!
Yr 12 OCR Nationals – LEVEL 3Unit 2 – Pointers for success!
AO1Surviving…
Surviving AO1…
For Every Grade… Evidence of your discussions – agenda,
minutes, notes from each meeting Mindmaps! DEADLINES Success criteria – MEASURABLE ONES!!!
Surviving AO1…
For Merit/Distinction PLANNING documents – frequently
updated Gantt charts for whole project, some planning evidence of YOUR section
Evidence of how you contributed to the discussions to help the group achieve the best outcomes – who did what???
Success criteria with commentary of how you will test to check you achieved them
AO2Surviving…
Surviving AO2…
For Every Grade… Minimum 4 methods of collaborative
working Examples! Evidence of YOU USING THESE METHODS Minimum 3 methods to share information Examples Evidence of YOU USING THESE METHODS
Surviving AO2…
For Merit/Distinction 5 (6) communication methods (including
examples) with some commentary on how useful they are
4(5) collaborative working methods (including examples) with commentary on how effective they are
AO3Surviving…
Surviving AO3…
For Every Grade… Evidence of using a minimum of 2
different search engine types, giving at least one example of each
Evidence of using at least 2 techniques, explaining how these are best used
Evidence of using the identified techniques on the identified search engines, showing which is the best technique for each search engine, and which is the best combo overall…
Surviving AO3…
For Every Grade…RATE THE SEARCH RESULTS ON THE QUALITY NOT THE NUMBER!500000 results are pointless if they are all irrelevant: 100 relevant results are better!
Surviving AO3…
For Merit/Distinction 3 (4) different search engines 3 (5) different techniques
AO4Surviving…
Surviving AO4…
For Every Grade… Identify what you need to find out Use at least 1 non-ICT resource List your source and evaluate it’s
reliability and suitability Create a copyright table to ensure you
don’t miss anyone out Evidence of creating
bookmarks/favourites
Surviving AO4…
For Merit/Distinction 2 non-ICT resources Search using effective methods (Boolean,
keywords…) Store favourites in folders Explain the implications of copyright rules
on your use of the sources you chose
AO5Surviving…
Surviving AO5…
For Every Grade… Create the pullout! Check no spelling/factual/grammatical
errors Presentation must follow agreed house
style Minimum 3 different sources (min. 1 non
ICT) Confirm using bibliography that you used
the right number & type of resources Downloaded graphics AND text
Surviving AO5…
For Merit/Distinction Minimum 4 (5) sources (2 non-ICT) Captions/cross-references as well as a
DETAILED bibliography ‘Near-professional quality’
AO6Surviving…
Surviving AO6…
For Every Grade… Show how you used the sharing info and
collaborative working tools to produce your pullout
Show how you each reviewed each other’s work – LEGIBLE screenshots of your reviewing their work; them reviewing yours
Evidence of different drafts The Final Product
Surviving AO6…
For Merit/Distinction Version numbers Explain how you reacted to the feedback
given Tracked changes AND comments in Word
versions of pullout sections ‘Near professional standard’ 2 versions – reviewed and final
AO7Surviving…
Surviving AO7… For Every Grade…
Comment on the search engines, techniques and resources used:
How useful? How effective? How trustworthy?... Compare Internet and non-Internet resources Comment on suitability of The Final Product Comment on tools used, explaining how you
would change the way you worked for the next collaborative project
Comment on how you worked in the group, how others worked in the group, how the group as a whole operated
Surviving AO6…
For Merit/Distinction Comments include detailed examples! Evaluate the quality of the information
you found Evaluate the suitability of the final product Evaluate the tools used – and comment
on changes you will make for the next project.
Review (Evaluate) the effectiveness of your work, that of your group members and of the group as a whole