You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite...

12
measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub- lic funding of sta te election campaigns for the state legislature and for the six statewide office holders. T o participate, candidates would have to agree to abide by str ict spending limits and accept no priva te contr i- butions other than raising a certain amount of “seed money” in order to demonstrate that the candidate has a minimum level of public suppor t. This “seed money” could not just come from their own resources or those of a few rich suppor ter s, but a set number of $5 minimum contributions would be required, based on the impor tance of the office. If a “f air elections” funded candida te faced a race against a candida te who was priva tely funded, the “f air elections” funded candidate’ s spending limit would be raised to the level of his or her opponent. This matching provision would assure tha t all candi - da tes ha ve a level pla ying field for campaign funding , even against candidates who choose to raise money from wealthy special interests . The source of the funding for fair elections will come from limiting the corpora te franchise tax rollback recently granted to Missouri’ s largest for–profit corpora tions . The cost of the fair elections system is estima ted a t $10 to $11 million per election cycle, well wor th it to clean up politics in Missouri. It is less than 1/10 of 1% of the sta te budget and, given tha t wealthy special interests get millions in special deals due to their influence, this can actually save taxpayer s money . Citizens concer ned about their health and envi- ronment will benefit from reducing the influence of big money special interests on our elections . Studies on the voting records of politicians have repeatedly shown that there is a strong correlation between their big contr ibutors and whose interests they represent in government. Politicians who receive the largest amounts of campaign contr ibutions from big pollut- ing industr ies and industries tha t exploit na tural resources typically have the wor st environmental vot- ing records. Clean money in clean elections will ultimately mean a cleaner environment for all of us. Proposition B can help Missour i show the way in the growing movement toward campaign finance reform. Four states have already enacted f air elections laws . Now it’s time for Missour ians to step up to the challenge to refor m our election process and restore confidence in sta te gover nment. We urge you to become involved in the cam- paign for f air elections . For more information con- tact: Roy Henger son Missouri Coalition for the Environment 6267 Delmar – 2E St. Louis, MO . 63130 (314)727–0600. e–mail: royh@moenviron.org website: www .moenviron.org . by Roy C. Henger son Y ou care about the environment, about clean air and water, about protecting parks and forests. Y ou care about your health and the health of your family . So why should you suppor t and work for passage of Proposition B on the November 7th ballot? Proposition B would help make Missouri elections f airer and begin to take the big special interest money out of our elections . The cur rent system of campaign financing is out of control and benefits those big money interests who can use their financial resources to unduly influence the outcome of elections and the votes of politicians elected with their suppor t. Proposition B would halt the rising cost of campaigns, level the pla ying field for all candida tes for public office, allow candida tes to focus on the public interest ra ther than on raising huge amounts of money, and strengthen public confidence in our democracy . Missour i voter s ha ve been asking for campaign finance refor m for quite some time. However, bills in the state legislature have repeatedly been blocked. Politicians elected with the old system of big donor money are understandably reluctant to suppor t reform. For tuna tely, Missouri has the ballot initia - tive provision in its constitution so citizens can put by Ron McLinden Ozar k Chapter T ransportation Chair E duca tion and prescription dr ugs for senior s might be getting most of the attention this political season, but a projected $30 billion shor tf all in transportation funding over the next 20 year s promises to eclipse them as Missour i’s Number One issue. The Missouri Depar tment of T ranspor tation (MoDOT) released its draft Long–Range T ranspor tation Plan in September and the bottom–line number s are sobering. The cost of meet- ing the sta te’s transportation needs — for all modes, including transit and rail — will be approxima tely $52 billion over the next 20 years. It’s anticipa ted tha t available funds, including federal funds, will total only $22 billion. Tha t leaves a whopping $30 billion that is needed — about $1.5 billion per year. As expected, the lion’s share of the need is for highwa ys and bridges: nearly $42 billion. The plan divides this between preserva tion needs ($22 billion) and expansion needs ($20 billion). “Preser va tion” includes “rehabilitation and reconstruction” work that must be done to keep the sta te’ s 32,000 miles of roads in operating condition, and to br ing them up to acceptable standards . “Expansion” includes essential- ly all of the projects in the f ailed “fifteen year plan” of 1992 — those four–lane highwa ys to every town of 5,000 or more. Public transit needs are estima ted at $8.5 bil- lion, while the inter–city passenger rail and bus ser- vice need is estimated at $0.4 to $2.6 billion, depend- ing on whether a full–blown high–speed rail system is implemented. No estimate is given for bike and pedestr ian needs — in part because these needs are often considered incidental to highway construction projects, and in par t because MoDOT simply doesn’ t have a handle on the extent of those needs . If we take these estima tes at face value — and we should not do that, of cour se — the question becomes how to raise the money . The two most obvi- ous sources are the gas tax and the general sales tax. Based on MoDOT’ s estimates of revenue per penny of tax, it would take a gasoline tax increase of about 50 cents per gallon, or a sales tax increase of 3 cents, to raise $1.5 billion per year . Either way the VOLUME 32 • NUMBER 6 NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2000 One Earth One Chance Y ou Wa nt Fai r El ec tio ns ? V o t e f or Pr o po s i tio n B continued on page 2... Transportation Plan T ranspor ta t ion Pla n Is $30 Billio n Shor t For the latest updates, visit us on the web: http://www.sierraclub.org/chapters/mo/

Transcript of You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite...

Page 1: You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding

measures to a vote of the people despite inaction bythe legislature.

Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding of state election campaigns for the statelegislature and for the six statewide office holders.Toparticipate, candidates would have to agree to abideby strict spending limits and accept no private contri-butions other than raising a certain amount of “seedmoney” in order to demonstrate that the candidatehas a minimum level of public support. This “seedmoney” could not just come from their ownresources or those of a few rich supporters, but a setnumber of $5 minimum contributions would berequired, based on the importance of the office.

If a “fair elections” funded candidate faced arace against a candidate who was privately funded,the “fair elections” funded candidate’s spending limitwould be raised to the level of his or her opponent.This matching provision would assure that all candi-dates have a level playing field for campaign funding,even against candidates who choose to raise moneyfrom wealthy special interests. The source of thefunding for fair elections will come from limiting thecorporate franchise tax rollback recently granted toMissouri’s largest for–profit corporations. The cost ofthe fair elections system is estimated at $10 to $11million per election cycle, well worth it to clean uppolitics in Missouri. It is less than 1/10 of 1% of thestate budget and, given that wealthy special interestsget millions in special deals due to their influence,

this can actually save taxpayers money.Citizens concerned about their health and envi-

ronment will benefit from reducing the influence ofbig money special interests on our elections. Studieson the voting records of politicians have repeatedlyshown that there is a strong correlation between theirbig contributors and whose interests they represent ingovernment. Politicians who receive the largestamounts of campaign contributions from big pollut-ing industries and industries that exploit naturalresources typically have the worst environmental vot-ing records.

Clean money in clean elections will ultimatelymean a cleaner environment for all of us. PropositionB can help Missouri show the way in the growingmovement toward campaign finance reform. Fourstates have already enacted fair elections laws. Nowit’s time for Missourians to step up to the challengeto reform our election process and restore confidencein state government.

We urge you to become involved in the cam-paign for fair elections. For more information con-tact:

Roy HengersonMissouri Coalition for the Environment6267 Delmar – 2ESt. Louis, MO. 63130(314)727–0600.e–mail: [email protected] website: www.moenviron.org .

by Roy C. Hengerson

You care about the environment, about cleanair and water, about protecting parks andforests.You care about your health and the

health of your family. So why should you supportand work for passage of Proposition B on theNovember 7th ballot? Proposition B would helpmake Missouri elections fairer and begin to take thebig special interest money out of our elections.

The current system of campaign financing isout of control and benefits those big money interestswho can use their financial resources to undulyinfluence the outcome of elections and the votes ofpoliticians elected with their support. Proposition Bwould halt the rising cost of campaigns, level theplaying field for all candidates for public office, allowcandidates to focus on the public interest rather thanon raising huge amounts of money, and strengthenpublic confidence in our democracy.

Missouri voters have been asking for campaignfinance reform for quite some time. However, billsin the state legislature have repeatedly been blocked.Politicians elected with the old system of big donormoney are understandably reluctant to supportreform. Fortunately, Missouri has the ballot initia-tive provision in its constitution so citizens can put

by Ron McLindenOzark Chapter Transportation Chair

Education and prescription drugs for seniorsmight be getting most of the attention thispolitical season, but a projected $30 billion

shortfall in transportation funding over the next 20years promises to eclipse them as Missouri’s NumberOne issue.

The Missouri Department of Transportation(MoDOT) released its draft Long–RangeTransportation Plan in September and thebottom–line numbers are sobering. The cost of meet-ing the state’s transportation needs — for all modes,including transit and rail — will be approximately$52 billion over the next 20 years. It’s anticipatedthat available funds, including federal funds, will totalonly $22 billion. That leaves a whopping $30 billionthat is needed — about $1.5 billion per year.

As expected, the lion’s share of the need is forhighways and bridges: nearly $42 billion. The plandivides this between preservation needs ($22 billion)and expansion needs ($20 billion). “Preservation”includes “rehabilitation and reconstruction” workthat must be done to keep the state’s 32,000 miles ofroads in operating condition, and to bring them up toacceptable standards. “Expansion” includes essential-ly all of the projects in the failed “fifteen year plan” of1992 — those four–lane highways to every town of5,000 or more.

Public transit needs are estimated at $8.5 bil-lion, while the inter–city passenger rail and bus ser-vice need is estimated at $0.4 to $2.6 billion, depend-

ing on whether a full–blown high–speed rail system isimplemented. No estimate is given for bike andpedestrian needs — in part because these needs areoften considered incidental to highway constructionprojects, and in part because MoDOT simply doesn’thave a handle on the extent of those needs.

If we take these estimates at face value — andwe should not do that, of course — the questionbecomes how to raise the money. The two most obvi-ous sources are the gas tax and the general sales tax.Based on MoDOT’s estimates of revenue per pennyof tax, it would take a gasoline tax increase of about50 cents per gallon, or a sales tax increase of 3 cents,to raise $1.5 billion per year. Either way the

VOLUME 32 • NUMBER 6 N OVEMBER/DECEMBER 2000

One Earth One Chance

You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B

continued on page 2...Transportation Plan

Tr a n s p o rtation Plan Is $30 BillionS h o rt

For the latest updates, visit us on the web:http://www.sierraclub.org/chapters/mo/

Page 2: You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding

increase would have to go to the voters for approval.

The Plan, As a PlanOverall, the plan is getting favorable reviews

for being at least a good start on addressing trans-portation needs. Significantly, the plan proposesguidelines for how to prior itize future spending forhighways, while avoiding the trap of identifying spe-cific projects.That will be done year by year asMoDOT updates its five–year spending plan. Ofgreatest significance, perhaps, is that it identifiessafety and preservation of the existing system ashighest priority. Even those needs, however, exceed

available funding.The plan also

has its shortcom-ings. MoDOT rec-ognizes this, andcharacterizes theplan as a work inprogress. Based onour quick review,here are some of itsdeficiencies:nThe plan takest r a n s p o rt at i o npretty much for

gr a n t e d , without stepping back to considerwhere it fits in a broader context. It focuses ont r a n s p o rt ation investment “ i n p u t s ” more thanon “ o u t p u t s ” or benefits to society.

nThe plan appears to assume that MoDOT willcontinue to do pretty much what it alreadyd o e s , albeit with some expansion in transit andinter–city passenger transport at i o n .

nThe plan gi ves inadequate attention to safety.Building roads to be safer is considered, o fc o u rs e , but there’s little or no mention of therole of dri ver behavior and traffic law enforce-ment in saving lives and avoiding injuri e s.

nThe plan gi ves little consideration to urbangr owth policies and their impact on transport a-tion expansion needs.

nThe plan offers no policy altern at i ve s. W h atmight be the costs and benefits of shifting, s ay,$5 billion from highways to transit? You wo n ’tfind the answer in this document — nor eve nthe question.

Multi–Faceted Approach NeededThe size of the funding shortfall is so enor-

mous that a single–tax solution is not likely.Meeting the identified needs is going to require acomprehensive and multi–faceted approach totransportation. That approach must include the fol-lowing principles at minimum:

nTrim highway expansion expectat i o n s. Some ofthe projects desired for economic deve l o p m e n tand other purposes are going to have to bedropped or at least postponed.

nIncrease funding for transit over and above theneeds identified, as a matter of policy, to make

up for past decades ofn e g l e c t .nRequire gr e ater localfunding for projects thatare pri m a rily for localb e n e f i t . For example,local jurisdictions shouldbear more of the cost ofwidening state highway sto ease congestion alonglocal commercial stri p s.nPromote better localland development prac-tices to help reduce localtraffic — provide more“ a c c e s s ” through prox i m i-ty and less throughm o b i l i t y.nRaise user fees — themotor fuel tax, ve h i c l esales taxe s , and ve h i c l er e gi s t r ation fees to leve l sat least as high as sur-rounding stat e s.

nIncrease user fees on trucks — perhaps througha “ weight–distance tax” — to assure that theyp ay more of the cost of the damage they do toh i g h way s.The trucking industry will protestt h at such fees will just be passed along toproduct consumers — and that ’s the way itshould be.

nIncrease the general sales tax only after userfees have been raised to the highest level toler-a b l e .

nUse congestion pricing — or “ t i m e – o f – d ay ”tolls — on urban freeways to shift trips toa l t e rn ate routes or off–peak time peri o d s , a n dthereby reduce or postpone the need for addedc a p a c i t y.

nImplement tolls on new or expanded inters t at eh i g h way s.

nC r e ate inters t ate highway corridor benefit dis-t ricts within which a tax surcharge would belevied on all businesses that depend on high-way traffic — gas stat i o n s , m o t e l s , r e s t a u r a n t s ,and outdoor adve rt i s i n g .

The Political AngleFunding transportation needs is going to

require leadership from our next governor.Curiously, credible leadership is not yet apparent.One candidate adheres rigidly to the “fifteen–yearplan” of 1992, and insists he can have all those pro-jects under construction by 2011 without anincrease in taxes.The other candidate says, “No,that won’t work” — but he doesn’t say what hewould do. Obviously neither candidate wants to sayhe’ll raise taxes for transportation. But one haspromised that he won’t raise taxes — in spite of thefact that the 6–cent gas tax increase enacted in1992 will expire in 2008.

Meanwhile, a new organization called“Transport Missouri” has been formed to lead acampaign for new transportation funding. Theyanticipate holding at least a couple of public forumsprior to the November 7 election. Their impact onthe gubernatorial election, if any, is hard to predict.

In short, things are about to get pretty inter-esting, transportation–wise.

The complete 226–page Long–RangeTransportation Plan draft is available on MoDOT’swebsite. Go to www.modot.state.mo.us, and select“Long–Range Transportation Plan” under “OtherInformation” near the end of the site map.Comments will be accepted throughmid–November..

The Ozark Sierran is pub-lished six times a year by theOzark Chapter of the SierraClub. Annual dues of SierraClub members pay for subscription to this publication. Non-members may subscribe for $15 per year.Items for publication: Contact Bob Sherrick via E-mail at [email protected] or phone (816) 779-6708, PRIOR TOSENDING, for information on how to submit articles. The editors reserve the right to edit articles! Material may beedited for length, content, or clarity. It is our job to help youcommunicate. If you have strong creative ownership of yourwriting, and wish to review your edited article before publication,consider your deadline 10 days prior to the published deadline.With notice, we will be happy to work with you. Reproduction quality photographs (prints) or artwork are dearlywelcome. Pleeease: send us photos...

The published deadline is thereal, honest-to-goodness,drop-dead deadline—not acouple of days or a week

later! Submissions received after the deadline are subject to thepossibility they won’t appear in the issue: you will feel bad andwe will feel bad. Call us nasty, but we are determined thisnewsletter will come out on time!The OZARK SIERRAN is produced on a Macintosh computer, sowe strongly prefer to receive material electronically (E-mail), oron a Mac or PC disk (3.5“), WITH A HARD COPY OF THE TEXT.Typed articles are also OK (must be received a few days beforethe deadline). All submissions must include name, address, andphone number of the author. If you want your submissionreturned (including your disk), please include a SASE.H a rd-working, All-volunteer Editorial and Production Staff : B o bS h e rrick, Editor; Keet Kopecky, a n d Claus Wa w rz i n e k

Ozark Sierran N ovember/December ‘ 0 02

C h a p t e r E x e c u t i v e C o m m i t t e eA T L A R G E :

Keet Kopecky, Chapter Chair9211 Olmstead, Kansas City, MO 64138(816)966-9544Andrew Gondzur, Vice Chair4037 McDonald Ave., St. Louis, MO 63116(314)772-8810Gale Burrus, Secretary, SC Council Delegate9828 Willow Avenue, #1A, Kansas City, MO 64134 (816)763-5120Donna Clark Fuller, Treasurer,7400 E. 235th St., Peculiar, MO 64078 (816)779-7284Herschel Asner10381 Oxford Hill Drive, St. Louis, MO 63146 (314)991-3450Gina DeBarthe2036 James Downey Rd., Independence, MO 64057 (816)383-6497 or (816)257-1198Wallace McMullen2805 Mohawk Dr., Jefferson City, MO 65101 (573)636-6067

Tom MoranColumbia, MO(573)442-6955Caroline Pufalt, Conservation Chair13415 Land-O-Woods, #3, St. Louis, MO 63141 (314)878-3165

G R O U P R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Eastern Missouri Group: vacantOsage Group: vacantThomas Hart Benton Group: Dan Fuller7400 E. 235th St., Peculiar, MO 64078 (816)779-7284Trail of Tears Group: Brian Alworth2826 Whitener St., Cape Girardeau, MO 63701

(573)334-7978Highlands Activity Section: Lori Anne Clark3027 Hogan Dr., Jefferson City, MO 65109

COMMITTEE CHAIRS

Education Chair: Leslie [email protected]

Legal Chair: Deferred Gifts Officer: Roger Hershey18308 Hanthorne Drive, Independence, MO 64057 (816)795-7533

Legislative Chair: vacant

Membership Chair: Ginger Harris 556 Oakhaven La., St. Louis, MO 63141 (314)432-2618

Newsletter Editor: Bob Sherrick10807 E. 205th St., Peculiar, MO 64078 (816)779-6708

Political Chair: Tom Moran(573)442-6955

Population Chair: Robert Elworth, M.D.RR 2 Box 5324, Willard, MO 65781 (417)742-2775

Transportation Chair: Ron McLinden3236 Coleman Rd., Kansas City, MO 64111 (816)931-0498

S t a ff C hap ter Of f i c eKen Midkiff, Program DirectorScott Dye, Ag CoordinatorTerri Folsom, Administrative Assistant1007 N. College, Suite 1, Columbia, MO 65201 (573)815-9250 voice/answering machine (573)442-7051 FAX/modem (800)628-5333 Water Quality Hotline

Tr a n s p o rtation Plan. . . . . .continued from page 1

Page 3: You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding

News release from Sierra Club Washington, D. C. Office

International negotiators are currently decidinghow strong the Kyoto Global Warming Protocolwill be. While countries such as Great Britain are

actually finding ways to reduce their emissions (ohby the way, U.S. autos emit more CO2 than everysource in Great Britain combined!) negotiators forthe U.S. are trying to avoid making any real reduc-tions in our own emissions. Instead, the U.S. is pro-moting a system of pollution permit trading whichwould allow U.S. polluters to continue polluting asusual domestically while placing the burden of mak-ing real reductions upon other countries. The U.S.would then buy the “credits” earned by those coun-tries making reductions.

Negotiators are trying to take advantage of

ever y possible loophole and even create new ones.For example, the U.S. is trying to ensure that U.S.polluters will be able to continue to pollute, so longas they buy emissions reductions that have alreadyoccurred in Russia, which has shut down many pol-luting plants since 1990. This “Hot Air” loopholewould mean that pollution that didn’t come out ofRussian tailpipes and smokestacks could come outof ours. The Administration is also seeking to allowthe U.S. to get pollution reduction credits for merelykeeping existing forests standing. And the nuclearindustry is absolutely salivating at the U.S. proposalthat polluters could earn pollution credits from newnuclear power plants abroad.

The Sierra Club has taken a position againstthese risky trading schemes and opposes the use of“credits” as a right to pollute. Instead of passing theresponsibility on to others and delaying any action,we’re pressing for real reductions in domestic emis-sions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases.We shouldbe making our cars, powerplants and factories pol-lute less, not rely on less developed countries toclean up our mess.

TAKE ACTION. Contact the White House(phone: 202-456-1111, or email: [email protected]). Urge President Clinton to instruct U.S.negotiators to stop weakening the Kyoto Protocolwith loopholes designed to avoid making real reduc-tions. We should take World leadership by cutting

our own global warming emissions..

Ozark Sierran N ovember/December ‘ 0 03

U.S. NEGOTIATING TO WEAKEN GLOBALWARMING TREAT Y

by Caroline PufaltOzark Chapter Conservation Chair, ExCom

If there is any American agency, tradition, or ideathat Sierrans closely identify with it’s theNational Park system.We know our roots go

back to John Muir and his cohorts who viewedYosemite and other spectacular places as Americantreasures which deserved special protection. Weknow that from its formal inception in 1916, theNational Park Service (NPS) has striven to protectthose parks and provide visitors with quality visitingopportunities. That history has not been without itsproblems, as the NPS has struggled with conflictingpressures from the public, from politics, from budgetlimitations and from within its own bureaucracy.Through it all our National Parks have remained aninvaluable contribution to our national identity andto the conservation of our natural resources.

Thus I felt especially privileged to attendDiscovery 2000, a NPS conference held in St. Louisthis Sept.The NPS holds a major management con-ference only about once every decade. The 1200attendees at Discover y 2000 included primarily NPSemployees from all levels of operation. A majortheme of the conference was meeting the challengesof managing and protecting natural resources amidmany other duties and pressures.

I have visited several National Parks andHistoric Sites and approached this conference withwhat I thought was a little more knowledge than theaverage citizen regarding the NPS. But I was stillamazed and inspired by the diversity of their chal-lenges and the talents and experience of theiremployees. The agency includes employees workingin remote outposts of Alaska to historic tenementsites in New York City. In Missouri the NPS man-ages the Ozark National Scenic Riverway, theGateway Arch grounds and exhibits, and TrumanHistorical Site in Independence.

I attended a workshop regarding historicalinterpretation which dealt with how to presentsometimes controversial truths to visitors of variedbackgrounds and sensibilities. And those “truths”sometimes change. One park employee working atan historical site in the south asked:What do we saynow about Thomas Jefferson? Other items I hearddiscussed at the conference were issues surroundingbudget limits, fire policy, fee demo projects, appro-priate technology for park facilities, working withconcessionaires, transportation problems, concernsof neighboring communities, relevancy of exhibits,requests for inappropriate recreational activities andjust what is inappropriate anyway?

Sierrans would have been especially interestedin the NPS’s recent program called the NaturalResources Challenge. This is an attempt to applygood science to resource management in order torestore and retain the natural heritage of the parks.Legislation passed in 1998 was designed to providemore resources for scientific study. Over its 84 year

history the NPS has sometimes placed more empha-sis on visitor and recreation issues than on protect-ing and understanding resources within parks. Inrecent years the agency has desired to take a moreproactive role in resource protection and this initia-tive is part of that effort. Included in this programwill be efforts to inventory park species and habitats,protect endangered and rare species, control nonnative species, and restore habitats. Readers mayhave heard of the inventory in Great SmokyMountain National Park that has already discoveredtwo species, the eastern spadefoot toad and molesalamander, not previously recorded in the park.

Conference participants had the benefit ofhearing from noted entomologist, naturalist andPulitzer Prize winner, Dr. E. O.Wilson and from ourown distinguished Dr. Peter Raven of the MissouriBotanical Gardens. Both stressed the importancethat National Parks can play in preserving our natu-ral heritage and in implementing the principles ofconservation biology. One of the tenants of that dis-cipline is that in general larger areas provide betterconservation opportunities and security for biodiver-sity. National parks need to work in concert withother public lands and private lands to achieve this.Parks, as large as some of them are, still need to besupplemented by good conservation practices inneighboring lands. Dr. Wilson even went so far as tostate opposition to commercial logging in ourNational Forests and to suggest that those landswould be better managed as National Parks. BothDr. Wilson and Dr. Raven recognized the difficultpolitical and social changes needed to achieve suchambitious goals.

As a citizen and user of National Parks I leftthe conference with a renewed appreciation for theagency and a renewed sense of responsibility to helpsupport the NPS and keep in on the right track..

The National Park Service Enters the 21st Century Wi t hEmphasis on Resource Pro t e c t i o n

Page 4: You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding

by Roy C. Hengerson

The citizens of several counties in the St. Louismetropolitan region in both Illinois andMissouri, as well as the City of St. Louis, will

have the opportunity to implement an exciting initia-tive to improve their parks and trails systems. TheClean Water, Safe Parks, and Community TrailsInitiative will improve water quality, increase parksafety, provide a community trail network, improvelocal parks, increase disabled public access to recre-ation, and protect wildlife habitat. It is on the ballotin several St. Louis Region counties and cities asProposition C.

In 1999 legis-lation was enactedby both theMissouri and IllinoisState Legislaturesthat authorizes cre-ation of separateregional park andrecreation districts.These districtswould not replacelocal park agencies,but would worktogether with them to expand recreational opportu-nities and improve and protect the environment.Inclusion in the regional districts is voluntary. Eachcounty can decide to join the district by approving aone tenth cent sales tax that would be used by thedistrict, and also by local park agencies, for park andrecreation purposes.

In Illinois the district is called the Metro–EastPark and Recreation District, and in Missouri thedistrict is called the Metropolitan Park andRecreation District. The two districts would belinked by inter–governmental agreements to insure

coordination of planning and development of theoverall parks and trails system. Counties that didnot join immediately could do so later as they real-ized the benefits of being part of the districts.Eleven counties, five in Illinois and six in Missouri,and the City of St. Louis are eligible to join one ofthe two districts.

The environmental community has been verysupportive of the regional park and recreation con-cept. Working with a large and diverse alliance ofgroups including Gateway Parks & Trails 2004, weworked to pass the authorizing state legislation andare now working to get the implementing measure

on the ballot and then approved by the voters. Fourof the Illinois counties eligible to join the Illinois dis-trict have put the measure on the November ballot.St. Louis City, St. Louis County, and St. CharlesCounty in Missouri have put the measure on theNovember ballot. The other eligible counties havedecided to see how the concept works and then willconsider putting it to a vote in the future.

If approved by voters, funds generated by theone tenth cent sales tax would be split 50/50between the newly established regional district in

each state, and county and municipal park agenciesin each participating county and the City of St.Louis. Each participating entity would have repre-sentation on the district Board in their state, whichwould have specific powers to plan and operate theregional parks and trails system. The Board wouldnot have the power of eminent domain, but couldissue bonds, contract with existing park agencies,and accept property and financial contributions.

The Clean Water, Safe Parks, and CommunityTrails Initiative is an exciting opportunity for thegreater St. Louis region to work cooperatively for acleaner, healthier, more livable environment.

Expanded recreationalfacilities, protected openspace and greenways, and ahigher quality of life areamong the many benefits.You are urged to supportProposition C by voting forthe November ballot mea-sure and working for itspassage where it is on theballot.

For more informationcontact: Roy Hengerson

Missouri Coalitionfor the Environment

6267 Delmar — #2ESt. Louis, MO 63130(314)727–0600 e–mail: royh@moenv-

iron.org website: www.moenviron.org .

Ozark Sierran N ovember/December ‘ 0 04

Big Opportunity for Regional Parks and Trails: Support Proposition C

by Alan JournetConservation Chair,Trail of Tears GroupDepartment of Biology, Southeast Missouri StateUniversity

In 1991, Federal District Judge William Dwyerbanned timber harvest sales on 24 million acresin 17 National Forests in Oregon,Washington,

and Northern California. The ban wasimposed until such time as the U.S. ForestService could provide assurance that loggingwould not harm the endangered northernspotted owl.

This decision brought the right wingdoomsayers out in force. President GeorgeBush proclaimed “It is time we worried notonly about endangered species, but endan-gered jobs.” Congressman Bob Smith (R -OR) warned that reducing logging on federallands “will take us to the bottom of a blackhole.” Senator Hatfield (R-OR), meanwhile,warned that the mill towns would be turnedinto ghost towns.

So, what actually happened? With thewisdom of 20/20 hindsight, we can nowassess the accuracy of these predictions.

In contrast to those dire economicfears, since 1991 the economy of the affectedareas has blossomed, with regional economiesout-performing even the national economy.While timber harvests have fallen 91% onfederal land (52% overall) and timber-relatedemployment has fallen 15%, per capitaincome has risen 25% (in 1999 dollars) andtotal employment has risen 31%.

Apparently there are three reasons for the out-come being opposite to the predictions of economiccatastrophe, none of which should have surprisedthe doomsayers of the day. The first is that in 1998

the timber industry played only a very small role inthe economy of the region, ranging from 0.9% inCalifornia to a high of 3.4% in Washington. InMissouri, by comparison, it represented just 1.3% ofthe state economy. A second reason is that in manystates, after the costs of forest management are takeninto account, logging is actually a net loss to regionaleconomies: in 1997, the loss in California amounted

to over $3.8 million, in Washington the loss was $1.4million. Only the National Forests of Oregon oper-ated as a regional economic plus, at $23.7 million.Interestingly, the Mark Twain National Forest ofMissouri during the same period cost the region

$1.2 million.A third contributor to the positive outcome is

that the timber harvest nationally comprises aminuscule proportion of the economic benefitgained from our National Forests. 1995 datarevealed that timber contributed just 2.7% of theGross Domestic Product generated from ourNational Forests and just 2.3% of the 3.3 million

jobs. Recreational activities, meanwhile, weighin at over 75% of the GDP, and 78% of thejobs. While recreational activities do not havea negative impact on timber harvest, thereverse is not the case. Many timber harvesttechniques harm recreation – either directly bydeterring tourists, or indirectly by pollutingrivers and damaging fisheries.

It turns out that rather than being aneconomic catastrophe as many continuallyargue, reducing or eliminating logging inNational Forests actually has resulted in aneconomic boom in the Northwest. As manyconservatives are beginning to realize, ourNational Forests are too valuable a resourcefor us to allow their management for the bene-fit of a small though politically powerful seg-ment of society: the timber industry. If wewere to apply sound economic management tothese forests we would reap not only economicbenefits, but would also provide improvedhabitat for a wealth of the nation’s threatenedand endangered species.

It is time for us to evaluate more wiselythe social and economic costs and benefits oflogging our National Forests and incorporate

into the accounting non-timber benefits and servicesprovided.

Information based on Niemie and Fifield 2000“Seeing the Forests for the Green,” a Sierra Club Report..

N O RTHERN SPOTTED OWL TURNS OUT TO BE AN ECONOMIC BOON

Page 5: You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding

by Laurel HopwoodChair of Sierra Club Genetic Engineering Committee

Philip Morris is a household name, and theMarlboro man is more famous yet, but did youknow that the cigarette company is also a major

seller of genetically engineered (GE) food? SierraClub’s Genetic Engineering Committee has chosen totarget what turns out to be the biggest packaged foodcompany in the U.S., demanding that Kraft produceGE free food, or label it as genetically engineered if itdares. Surveys have found that a majority of us areleery of GE ingredients, and labels would allow us tovote with our dollars.

Sierra Club isn’t opposed to genetic engineer-ing, but the Club has asked for a moratorium on GEcrops, which use gene splicing techniques to transfergenes from viruses, bacteria, unrelated plant species,and animals into food crops. This is just the ver ybeginning, but already 100 million acres have beenplanted.

Genetic engineering is a radical technologywhereby genes from one or many species can beintroduced into totally unrelated species, which are

then called transgenic. The fundamental blueprints ofthe natural world are being manipulated in this wayand, in the case of crops, are being released into theenvironment without any precautions. The resultscan’t be predicted and there may be no remedies forthe consequences.

GE crops create pollen which can blow in thewind. Many of the crops contain their own pesticide,and the pollen of GE corn has been shown to killmonarch butterflies. Cross pollination of neighboringorganic farms results in a huge loss for organic farm-ers since the crop can no longer be regarded asorganic. Other crops are Roundup Ready, designed totolerate Monsanto’s herbicide. The crops then getsprayed with more Roundup and both the active andthe inert ingredients are a cause for concern.

Europe, and also Canada, bans rBGH (cowgrowth hormone) to treat dairy cows (it doesn’t turnthem into Olympic sprinters, it makes them producemore milk). This is also a genetically engineeredproduct. The major human health concern is thatrBGH causes the milk to contain increased levels ofIGF–I, which is a growth factor for prostate andbreast cancers.

WHATYOU CAN DOIf you think it’s time to stop this experiment for

which the American people never volunteered, here’show you can help:

1) Contact Betsy Holden, CEO of Kraft Fo o d s ,I n c. , 3 Lakes Dri ve , N o rt h f i e l d , IL 60093. S e esample letter below.

2) Call 1(800)847–1997 to say N O to Kraft’sgenetically manipulated foods.

3) Send an e–mail via the Kraft web site:w w w. k r a f t . c o m / h t m l / e m a i l / e m a i l . h t m l .

4) Contact Laurel Hopwo o d , C h a i r , for a supplyof postcards to distri bute to your fri e n d s , fa m i l y,and colleagues to send to Kraft.

Sample letter:I’m writing to ask you to remove genetically

engineered (GE) products from your foods, just asI’m trying to remove them from my table. Transgeniccrops — crops which have been genetically manipu-lated with viral, bacterial, and animal genes — poseenvironmental risks and I believe shouldn’t be in ourfood supply until adequately tested and clearlylabeled. Dairy products made with milk from r–BGHtreated cows are banned in many countries as possi-bly contributing to cancer. For our health and theenvironment, I ask that you move to GE free produc-tion.

You can find the Sierra Club’s Policy (andmuch more) on agricultural biotech on our website:www.sierraclub.org/biotech. To subscribe to ourBiotech Forum listserv, contact Jim Diamond:[email protected]. For any questions, con-tact Laurel Hopwood, Chair, Genetic EngineeringCommittee: [email protected] or (216)371–9779..

Ozark Sierran N ovember/December ‘ 0 05

CARE TO DRIVE SOME COFFIN NAILS INTOGENE ENGINEERED FOOD?

by Peter Huberreviewed by Caroline PufaltOzark Chapter Conservation Chair, ExCom

Ibecame interested in reading this book due to amessage I read about it on Sierra Clube–mail.The message was from Carl Pope,

Executive Director of the Sierra Club, in which healerted readers that they may see quotes or refer-ences to this book in anti–environmental editorialsand gave some advice on how to respond. Mr.Pope’s advice on responding was that on just aboutany page one can find a quote so ridiculous as tocast well founded skepticism on the whole treatise.The quote he chose was:

“Cut down the last redwood for chopsticks,harpoon the last blue whale for sushi, and the addi-tional mouths fed will nourish additional humanbrains which will soon invent ways to replace blub-ber with olestra and pine with plastic. Humanity cansurvive just fine in a planet–covering crypt of con-crete and computers.”

An outrageous statement, but to be fair toHuber, taken a bit out of context. It is hard to worryabout being fair to Huber, however, but more onthat later. The plastic and concrete nightmare worlddescribed above is not one that Huber wants to livein, but is one that he believes is possible.WhatHuber does seem to want is a world similar to thatdescribed above but dotted with preserves of wilder-ness for human aesthetic enjoyment.

The book is subtitled Saving the Environmentfrom the Environmentalists,a Conservative Manifesto. Iread it in hopes of understanding another perspec-

tive. I did not expect to agree with that perspectivebut it’s always good to be exposed to other view-points. However, I have rarely been so often temptedjust to give up on a book as I was when reading thisone. The book lacked coherency, made outrageouscomparisons, is full of contradictions, gave very fewreferences, and poorly explained its few points.Huber, like most extremists, divides environmentalviewpoints into two camps, hard and soft. He is soinvolved in his anti–soft ranting that he easily slipsoff topic and the reader is often left searching forsome coherent point.

Huber places himself in the “hard green”camp, a tradition he claims back to Teddy Roosevelt( Too bad T.R. can not defend himself ). Huberclaims that what is important for environmentalismtoday is simply to save land for wilderness, be itforests, mountains, seashores, etc. He claims thatthis wildness has an aesthetic value and sometimes apractical value, such as watershed protection. OK sofar, but Huber does not stop there. He argues formining, using oil reserves, plane travel, against recy-cling, and shows an amazing lack of appreciation forthe services nature provides. He argues that theseactivities use less land surface and are thereforemore “green” than soft alternatives.

Soft alternatives would be alternative energysuch as solar or wind, which use land surface.

Recycling paper is counterproductive becausewe should be cutting and re–growing trees as a wayof using up carbon. Huber is also critical of “soft-green” for depending too much on computer modelsand micro–managing pollution. Pollution controls

H a rd Gre e n is Hard To Ta k e

continued on page 6...Hard Green

Page 6: You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding

Ozark Sierran N ovember/December ‘ 0 06

are best left to the markets and computer models aretoo uncertain and too likely to be interpreted pes-simistically by“softies.”

But Huber has no difficulty making wildlyoptimistic projections based on what I’m not sure.He repeats some of the well worn predictions thatwith our brains and technology on our side, wehumans can think, invent, and with the aid of thefree market, find our way out of any environmentalproblem.The current environmental “balance” is notthe only one possible, nature is now “ at our feet,”we can do what we will. We can “invent” in the labanything and more that is found in nature.

It is hard to over emphasize all the contradic-tions and highly selective examples used to supportoutlandish conclusions in this book. One of theworst is his claim that efficiency is not “green.”According to Huber when we make our refrigeratorsmore efficient to save energy and fuel, we will justthen be able to afford bigger refrigerators and willend up using more resources.Therefore, why makeefficient appliances, cars, etc.? On the otherhand heclaims that purchasing an SUV is efficient because itmakes the purchaser feel wealthy and satisfied and

that’s economic efficiency. He also points out morethan once that it is more efficient to burn oil in alarge central power plant than in a two–stroke lawnmower. This he uses as part of his argument for largepower plants and not decentralized solutions such assolar or wind. At most it seems like an argument forelectric mowers, or better yet, push mowers. Butwait; he also points out how inefficient “humanpower” is, we need to eat too much per unit of ener-gy expended. Can anyone make sense of this?

Huber expects that most conservation can beaccomplished through private efforts. Wealth bringsthe luxury of private preserves and easements, etc.Where needed, the government can preserve largerwild spaces. He usesYellowstone as an example ofthis. But nowhere does Huber show an appreciationof the principles of conservation biology. He refersto the hard green approach as Central Park on alarge scale. From his point of view we do not have aresponsibility to the evolution of the restof the plan-et, only to ourselves.

He clearly states that his brand of conservationis not based on moral imperatives, just aesthetic andpractical ones. He strongly rejects the concept thatnonhuman life has “inherit value.” He claims that

will only lead to placing nonhuman life at a par orabove that of humans. It is in Huber’s discussion of“Ethics in a Green Lifeboat” that I really lost allrespect for him. Suffice it to say that he compares“soft green” ethics with what he calls the two othermajor nonreligious movements of the 20th century,fascism and communism.When he goes on to criti-cize the public examination of Theodore Kacynski’swriting (the Unabomber), he concludes that “mur-der now can be green.” The whole chapter is a cal-lous dismissal of many important issues.

Huber’s book seems like a confusing mess, ormaybe I missed the point. But as I said earlier, it ishard to worry about being unfair to him. He spendsso much time on being unfair to others. Early inHuber’s book he states his concern that we arespending too much effort trying to cleanup everysuperfund site and extract every polluting particlefrom the air and not enough on saving wilderness.I’m sure many Sierrans also worry about how to bal-ance and prioritize what we can do, but don’t expectHuber’s book to give you any advice on how to doit..

by Ron McLindenOzark Chapter Transportation Chair

Time to begin planning for this year’s BuyNothing Day. You know, the annual celebra-tion of sanity held on the same day-after-

Thanksgiving when the rest of the country goes on ashopping binge.

The idea is simple: just boycott the madness.Buy Nothing Day is the creation of Adbusters, a

decidedly counter-establishment group of advertisingindustry folks. Their purpose is to focus attention onAmerican over-consumption. For more information,including a poster you can download and print, checktheir website, adbusters.org/campaigns/bnd/.

November 24 is Buy Nothing Day

H a rd Gre e n. . . . . .continued from page 5

George W. Bush’s Toxic Record“Bush let industry write an anti–pollution measure, and

believes voluntary plans, not regulation, can clean up the airand water.”

“No Wonder Texas Has A World–ClassPollution Problem”

–Time Magazine

Despite Bush’s attempt to get business to voluntarily reduceemissions, Texas has continued to lead the nation in industri-al air emissions, which increased in the U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agenct’s most recent Toxic Release Inventory.The state’s toxic pollution discharged into surface watersjumped nearly 20 percent, to approximately 25 millionpounds. And for the first time in history, Houston toppedLos Angeles as the nation’s smog capital in 1999. –EPA, AirToxics Release Inventory

“Governor Bush has shown more concern with giv ing pol-luters options than with protecting families who breathe thenation’s dirtiest air,” Ellen Pillard, Chair of the ToiyabeChapter of the Sierra Club said.

Texas Goveror George Bush has received “more than a milliondollars in campaign contributions from Texas’s worst air pol-luters. –Time Magazine

Some images wi l l l i ve on l ong after

we’r e gone. Andwe get to

choosewhi ch ones those ar e.

The Ever gl ades i s nati onal tr easur e—as wel l as one of the mostbi ol ogi cal l y si gni fi cantwetl ands i n the wor l d.And i t’ s al so one of themost endanger ed si tes

i n Amer i ca. Joi n us now,so together we can save what

r emai ns of theseand other pr eci ous

wi l dl ands for gener ati ons to come.

Page 7: You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding

Andrew Gondzur (St. Louis) I have been a member of the Sierra Club for sixyears and am a current member of the Executive Committee of the Ozark Chapter.I have thoroughly enjoyed serving the club in this capacity. It has been a very valu-able and rewarding learning experience, and I would be honored to be given theopportunity to serve for a second term. I have also served on the Eastern MissouriGroup’s Executive Committee and as group representative. With the help of theOsage Group leaders, I coordinated the Chapter's Annual Reunion & Campout lastyear at beautiful Lake of the Ozarks State Park. I have been a member of theEndangered Species and Bio-diversity Committee, and, as such, have organizedoutings and hosted/co-led monthly meetings. I am strongly committed to environ-mental education and fostering positive values regarding the protection of the envi-ronment. Upon my reelection I will once again seek out and communicate yourconcerns to Chapter leadership and give priority to those efforts that activatemembership. I believe this is key to getting new members more involved which, inturn, helps spread word of the great work we are all doing to explore, enjoy, andprotect Missouri, as well as the rest of our precious planet.

Ozark Sierran N ovember/December ‘ 0 07

2001 Ozark Chapter ExCom Ballot instructions

To vote:1) Vote for up to four (4) people (you may write in addi-

tional names)2) If yours is a joint membership, two (2) members may

vote 3) Insert ballot into an envelope and address to

Bob Sherrick/Sierra Club Election Committee10807 E. 205thPeculiar, MO 64078

4) Write your membership number (the 8 digit number ontop of the computer address label) in the return addressspace of the envelope.

5) Affix 33¢ stamp and mail to us so it arrives by December 31, 2000.

I vote for ...(see personal profiles at left)

1st 2ndmember member

( ) ( ) Gina DeBarthe( ) ( ) Andrew Gondzur( ) ( ) Thomas Moran( ) ( ) Caroline Pufalt( ) ( )( ) ( ) .......................................( ) ( ) .......................................

Aboutthis

ballot

Your official ballot for the Ozark Chapter ExecutiveCommittee is on the right of this page. The ExCom setsChapter policy and oversees the business of the OzarkChapter. It is made up of nine members elected from themembership at large (you), plus one additional memberappointed by each of the five Sierra Club groups in Missouri.ExCom members are elected to staggered two-year terms.Of the current ExCom members, Herschel Asner, Gale Burrus,Donna Clark Fuller, Keet Kopecky, and Wallace McMullen con -tinue in office. That leaves four members to be elected thisyear. You may vote for up to four of the candidates namedon the ballot, or you may write in the name of another quali -fied member. If yours is a joint membership, two members

Executive Committee Ballot ProfilesGina DeBarthe (Kansas City)I am a 26 year old student of Biology and Environmental

Science. In order to better understand our planet, I have traveled to Europe, CostaRica, Mexico, Honduras, and all over the United States. No matter where I go, or whatI study, I am always struck by the great beauty of the natural world. It often seems thatour society has become too separated from nature, with people passing from one man-made environment into another. I would like the opportunity to work with theExecutive Committee to better educate the younger members of our community aboutthe environmental treasures that are all too often overlooked.

Caroline Pufalt (St. L o u i s ) The Sierra Club is a dynamic organization with alarge and complex mission: to preserve , p r o t e c t , and enjoy the wild places. To d ay,so many things fall under the environmental agenda. As a pri m a rily vo l u n t e e rbased group we must make hard choices about on what to spend our finite timeand energy. I will work to help our chapter make those choices and to increase ourvolunteer base so we can be the most effective in our conservation wo r k .I am currently Ozark Chapter Conservation Chair. In the past I have served aschapter chair and newsletter editor.The exe c u t i ve committee deals with the neces-s a ry business of the chapter. I’ll try to use my experience to see that we all wo r ktogether as effectively as possible. I also hope that I can help group level activistsget to know their counterp a rts across the state so we can share experiences andincrease our awareness of state level issues.

Thomas Moran (Columbia) Hi. I'm Thomas Moran, from Columbia, MO. I havebeen serving on the Ozark Chapter excom for a year now. At first appointed toserve out the term of a prior member, I have enjoyed my time on excom, have par-ticipated in many activities, and served as political chair in this election cycle. Wehave endorsed many well-qualified candidates, and look forward to the culminationof our efforts in seeing a (more)responsible and balanced government seated afterNovember. I have been active in Sierra Club for 4 years now, and currently amOsage group chair, and am active locally in sprawl issues. I thank you for your votefor my continued activities on the Ozark Chapter Executive Committee.

Ozark ChapterSierra Club Ballot 2001

40%Percentage of dollars saved byreplacing an incandescent lightbulb with acompact fluorescent.Percentage by which energy con-sumption in developing nations is expect-ed to grow by 2010.Percentage of total paper used inGermany that goes towards packaging.Percentage by which one canreduce pollution from an older car bykeeping it well tuned.

Ecofacts:

Page 8: You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding

The Ozark Chapter of the Sierra Club has endorsed the following candidates forelection. Please keep them in mind when voting in the general election inNovember. Make your “voice” is heard in this very important election!

President:✔ Al Gore and Joseph Liebermann

U.S. Senate (MO): ✔ Mel Carnahan

U.S. 5th Congressional District:✔ Karen McCarthy

Treasurer (MO):✔ Nancy Farmer

Attorney General (MO): ✔ “Jay” Nixon

State Senate District 5:✔ Ken Jacobs

State Senate District 13: ✔ Wayne Goode

23rd Legislative District: ✔ Tim Harlan

25th Legislative District: ✔ Vicky Riback-Wilson

My Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Address _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

City / State _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ZIP _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

■ Check enclosed (made payable to “Sierra Club”) Phone (optional) __________________________________

Please charge my ■ MasterCard ■ VISA E-Mail (optional) ________________________________

Cardholder Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Card Number _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Expiration Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Contributions, gifts or dues to the Sierra Club are not tax deductible; they support our effective, citizen-based advocacy and lobbying efforts.Yourdues include $7.50 for a subscription to SIERRA magazine and $1.00 for your Chapter newsletter.

■Yes, I want to join! I want to help safeguard our precious natural heritage. My payment isenclosed.

M E M B E R S H I P C A T E G O R I E SINDIVIDUAL JOINT

INTRODUCTORY ...... ■ $25REGULAR .................... ■ $39 .......... ■ $47SUPPORTING .............. ■ $75 .......... ■ $100CONTRIBUTING ........ ■ $150 ........ ■ $175LIFE .............................. ■ $1000 ...... ■ $1250SENIOR ........................ ■ $24 .......... ■ $32STUDENT .................... ■ $24 .......... ■ $32LIMITED INCOME .... ■ $24 .......... ■ $32

Humans have a choicewhen it comes to protectingthe land. Nature doesn’t.Won't you join the Sierra Club, and add your voice to themany thousands who want to ensure that our nation'sunique natural heritage is protected?Join the Club and receive a FREE SierraClub Backpack!

F94QW 13 6 0 0

Sign check and mail to: P. O. B ox 52968, B o u l d e r, C O8 0 3 2 2 - 2 9 6 8

o SHOPPING MALL

o NATURE PRESERVE

8Ozark Sierran N ovember/December ‘ 0 0

Page 9: You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding

Ozark Sierran N ovember/December ‘ 0 09

One neighbor at a time. Oneneighborhood at a time.

by Mary LockwoodTHB Group Webmaster

The Household EcoTeam Program uses neigh-borhood groups to teach about resource–effi-cient lifestyles.With an easy–to–read workbook

and a proven format even a veteran recycler likemyself learned a trick or two. Better yet, I got tospend time with my neighbors.

Created in 1989 by Global Action Plan for theEarth, the Ecoteam program has worked with over15,000 people and hundreds of neighborhood groupsthroughout the United States. Over its first 10 yearsand with more than 12,000 participants, the savingswere dramatic:

14,557,200 pounds of garage recy c l e d48,524 trees save d762,851,344 gallons of water save d3,632,639 gallons of gasoline save d87,988,178 pounds of CO2 not dumpedTo t a l : $8,825,057 save d

If you doubt these numbers, consider one of theideas from the workbook. For just one day a weektake public transit or share the ride. You will instantlystop 20% of the pollution generated in your commut-ing.

Kansas City’s EcoTeam program works bybringing neighbors together to encourage each otherto follow new habits. The workbook presents a list ofdo–able actions to start today. Par ticipants commit tospecific tasks, then come back to report. Meetings are

times of shared experiences, pats on the back, andeating good food. Many good things happen; oneEcoTeam built a neighbor’s wheelchair ramp.

After about four months and seven meetings,the old team scatters like bees into the surroundingneighborhood to gather members for a new team ortwo. So it grows — one neighborhood at a time, oneneighbor at a time; neighbors becoming part of aninternational effort operating in 17 countries involv-ing over 150,000 people; neighbors becoming part ofeach others lives; small acts of consciousness makinglife simpler and richer.

Currently Kansas City has the only communityEcoTeam campaign in Missouri or Kansas. But any-one can start an Ecoteam program, anywhere, withthe support of the National office. More informationcan be found at http://globalactionplan.org under“sustainable lifestyle campaign.”

Or contact KC’s own June HolteE–mail: [email protected]: (816)513–3480

E c o Teams Build and Pre s e rv e :

What I Learned atE c o Te a mby Mary Lockwood

Iused to say that my mother was a Depressionbaby and for a long time a younger fr iendthought that I was saying she was a depressed

baby. My mother grew up in the Great Depressionon a farm in North Dakota.These were toughpeople who took nothing for granted. Everythingcame hard, and nothing was ever wasted. My auntlikes to say, “when we butchered, the only thingwe didn’t use was the oink” — which is to say myfamily was the first one on our block to recycle.My parents saved food cans in the garage, neatlywashed with the label and ends removed and flat-tened.When there was a carload we’d drive them25 miles to a neighboring town.

Not that I always understood. As a teen-agerit would make me furious that my mother washedand reused bread sacks. “We’re not that poor!”, I’dsulk. Later, away from home I realized, why would-n’t you wash and reuse bread sacks?

So I was exposed to recycling 30 years agoand have for the last twenty been an enthusiasticrecycler. We know the mantra: Reduce, Reuse,Recycle. So why did my husband and I joinEcoTeam?

1 . Someone asked. I never answer the door afterd a r k . But my husband did and there was a pleas-ant couple who asked us to come to a neighbor-hood organizational meeting. They were sincereand likable and we said ye s.

2 . We like meeting our neighbors. My husband and

I consider ours e l ves lifers on our street. I t ’s asmallish house in a pleasant neighborhood, c l o s eto the bus line with sidewalks and old trees. Wemight wish for a larger house someday, but thet ruth is our house holds a history of our wo r k

and our live s. I don’t like to think of leaving oursmallish house.H ow wonderful it is to gr ow old together. I amgr ateful for the gay people on my block.They donot have children and flee to the subu r b s.

3 . To learn a few new tri c k s. We were curious andfigured you can always learn a thing or two. A n dwe did. I hadn’t considered, for instance, a s k i n g

for tin foil instead of Styrofoam for restaurantl e f t ove rs. This is a small behavior change thatcosts little more than awa r e n e s s , but eliminat e sthe need for a bulky substance that literally neve rd e gr a d e s.4 . W h at I actually learn e d .Together my neigh-b o rs and I examined our small daily habits andthe details of how we live . We learned not onlydo our actions mat t e r , but our actions are at thecore of the problem.

We learned to catch our water in plastic jugs.Our water gets hot enough for dishes in aboutone gallon. When both jugs are full, I know I’mremiss in wat e ring something.

Sometimes the water goes out to the birdbat h .Vegetable scrub water sometimes goes to thecompost pile (biodegradable soap). I love the ri t-ual of the compost pile, walking through the ya r dwith my offeri n g, a small gesture of gr atitude forour abu n d a n c e .

This was the true gift of my experiencewith the EcoTeam. Simple awareness. Increasedmindfulness in ever yday life, doing all the goodthings you were taught to do. Don’t make amess. Play fair. Share.

As a consumptive nation, no one does itbetter than the United States. I say we’ve con-quered that quest. It’s time to move to the nextthing.

The time is ripe for anticonsumption. Let’shonor our rightful place in the universe. No wheredoes it read we have the right to pillage and destroy.Frankly, I’d rather have the universe on my side.

David and Mary Lockwood are currently volunteercoaches for the Kansas City EcoTeam.You can reach theauthor at [email protected].

A Sustainable Future...It Starts Where We LiveAmericans make up only 5% of the world’s population, yet we consume a third of the planet’s

resources. We waste up to 75% of what we consume due to inefficiency and lack of awareness.In the U.S., between 35% and 85% of a community’s natural resources are used at the house-

hold level. Even more resources are consumed indirectly through the purchase of products and ser-vices. Households are also a major source of air pollution from auto emissions and a source of waterpollution because products with toxic chemicals are used and enter the ground water.

How we live is a big part of the problem. It can also be a big part of the solution.If we exercise more care, or stewardship, in our use of the Earth’s finite resources (trees, water,

energy, minerals, land) we will develop more environmentally sustainable lifestyles. Sustainablelifestyles ensure that there will be enough resources left for our children and their children.

Global Action Plan’s Household EcoTeam Program helps individuals lower their environmen-tal impact by adopting more resource–efficient lifestyle practices.

“The major cause of the continued deterioration of the global environment is the unsustain-able patterns of consumption and production, particularly in the industrialized countries. Developedcountries must take the lead in achieving sustainable consumption.”

– United Nations Agenda 21–from the EchoTeam website at Global Action Planhttp://www.globalactionplan.org/

Page 10: You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding

Ozark Sierran N ovember/December ‘ 0 01 0

Reprinted form EnvironmentalExcellence by Bridging the Gap, Kansas City, Mo.

Here’s a checklist to saving money, resources, time, energy and frustrationthis holiday season. Choose Environmental Excellence wants to help youhave a happy, healthy and environmentally friendly holiday season. Plan

ahead and enjoy simpler times with your loved ones.

In October:

n Shop at thrift stores andyard sales for outrageousH a l l oween costumes, o rtrade old costumes with af ri e n d .

n Assemble a list of emailaddresses for all of yo u rfa m i l y, f ri e n d s , and guestsfor holiday events to savepaper and postage on inv i t a-t i o n s.

n “ G r e e n ” a ny event in yo u rhome by:

´ B o rr owing durabledishes from a neighboror friend for parties toavoid buying disposablepaper plat e s.´ Ask your guests toc a rpool to your part y —you know where theyl i ve , so match up thosewho live near each other—this can also help them designate a dri ve r !´ Need cloth napkins? Use wo rn tablecloths, s h e e t s , and other used tex-tiles to make napkins for large gat h e ri n g s.´ Tu rn down the therm o s t at shortly before guests arri ve to keep thehouse comfortable while saving energy and heating costs.

n E va l u ate your home for energyl o s s. We ather stripping or caulking cankeep you and your guests nice andt o a s t y. We at h e rizing your home forwinter and save 20-40% on your ener-gy bills and help keep our air clean.

In November:

n D o n ’t automatically gi ve “ s t u f f”for Chri s t m a s. Do something togetheror gi ve a serv i c e , like a spa day or gi f tpasses for a favo rite activity.Set a bu d g e t , and see how far underbudget you can get by giving recy c l e dor reused gi f t s. E ve ry dollar you spendc r e ates demand on the market to pro-duce more stuff.n Use last ye a rs ’ h o l i d ay cards tomake garland or decorate gi f t s.n Use wrapping paper scraps forb ows and house decorat i o n s.n Compost that pumpkin (or left-over pumpkin pie). Next spri n g ’s gar-den will thank yo u !

n Most wrapping paper isn’t recy c l a b l e . Search fora l t e rn at i ves to non-recyclable wrapping paper, such asm a p s , fa b ric scraps, b r own bags, or make your own fromr e cycled paper!n When shopping, take a canvas bag for purchases. I fyou forget your canvas bag, ask for a large bag at the firs tstore and carry it with you to other stores so that yo ucan refuse additional bags.n No need for yard waste bags! Compost those gor-geous fall leaves in your backya r d . I t ’s so easy. Call us

for a free brochure. ( 8 1 6 ) 5 6 1 - 1 0 8 7 .n B ring fall inside the house. Use pressed leave s , a c o rn s , and pinecones to

d e c o r ate the house for the holiday s.n S u p p o rt local, e nvironmentally friendly businesses with your holiday gi f t -

gi v i n g .

In December:

n C o n s o l i d ate shopping into one day for local friends and family and ordermail order items for long-distance fri e n d s. C a u t i o n : Mail order gifts areoften ove r - p a c k a g e d .

n C a rp o o l , shop with a fri e n d , combine tri p s , and share the day gift wrappingitems from old magazines scavenged from your local recycling center.

n C h ristmas lights are gorgeous, but are huge energy hogs. Place lights ont i m e rs , look for energy efficient options, and replace older bulbs with newo n e s.

n Make your Christmas wish-list reflect your environmental commitment.Request donations to your favo rite environmental cause, ask for compact flu-orescent light bu l b s , or just choose to share time together.

n Practice what you preach. Make gifts from used items or gi ve edible gi f t s.T h e rm o s t at timers , l ow - f l ow showe r h e a d s , sink aerat o rs and recy c l e d - c o n t e n tclothing are all gr e at gifts to teach your friends and family about protectingthe env i r o n m e n t .

n Plan accordingly for guests at the dinner table. Cook less meat and moreside dishes made from gr a i n s , f ru i t s , and ve g e t a b l e s. Your waist will thankyo u , and you’ll save valuable resources.

n Did you still end up with a pile of unwanted stuff? Have a post-holidayswap for New Ye a r ’s Day. I nvite all of your friends to a get together wheree ve ryone brings unwanted or duplicate items. One pers o n ’s trash is anotherp e rs o n ’s treasure.

For more holiday ideas, call (816)561-1087 and request Holiday Hints for theEarth or Simplify the Holidays.

Plan Ahead for theH o l i d a y s

Page 11: You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding

by Donna Clark FullerOzark Chapter ExCom,Treasurer

I‘m sitting here thinking that I’m glad the heat hasfinally broken and fall seems to be here, but I’malso looking at cracked ground and a lawn that

looks like if a match was set to it, a prairie fire would

spread pretty quickly. We’ve not only had a hot sum-mer, but a very dry one. We also had an incrediblydry spring. (Whoever heard of no rain in April!) Andas I recall, there wasn’t much precipitation, frozen orotherwise last winter. I notice I haven’t heard muchfrom the folks that think that global warming is just amyth and not worthy of our even considering as apossibility. I don’t pretend to be an expert on thatsubject, nor do I think anyone can predict the future

completely. But I don’t think it’s rational to believethat continuing to pour car exhaust and other pollu-tants into the air won’t have some unhealthy conse-quences.

However, even without global warming,Missouri weather is at best unpredictable. In lookingat the various plants I have around our place, I thinkthe native plants fared much better than thenon–native ones. I think native prairie plants had tobe able to put up with forty degree changes in tem-perature, floods, droughts, tornadoes, ice storms, heatwaves, etc. in order to survive here in Missouri.During the dry spring, the non–natives were alreadylooking stressed and had to be watered, while I haveonly recently watered the natives. Fall is the best timeto plant these plants. If you are thinking of plantingnative perennials, here is a short list of some commonones:

Purple coneflowers GoldenrodGray–headed coneflowers Prairie coreopsisTall larkspur Blazing starIndigo PhloxColumbine AstersWild geraniums Missouri primrose

These bloom at various times and can providewildlife habitat as well as provide a beautiful spectaclefor humans..

Ozark Sierran N ovember/December ‘ 0 01 1

O u t i n g s C o n t i n u e dTheater. Tour led by zoo docent. Donna ClarkFuller (816)779-7284.

Nov 12 (Sun) Weston Bend State Park Day Hike.Two loop trails connect to make seven miles ofhiking. You will enjoy lovely vistas, woodedareas, and grassland areas. Susan Fowler(816)531-8724.

Nov 17–19 (Fri–Sun) Caney Creek Backpacking.One of Arkansas’ prettiest trails, in the OuachitaMountains of west central Arkansas. Lots ofwater, not too many hills. Scott Hoober(816)561-0575.

Nov 25 (Sat) Squaw Creek Wildlife Refuge,Mound City, MO. Birdwatching featuring baldeagles, ducks, geese, geese, and more geese.

Dan and Donna Clark Fuller (816)779-7284.

Dec 2 (Sat) Dayhike at Weston Bend State Park.Hike and then tour historic Weston to get a tasteof old–time Christmas. LeeAnn Googe (816)453-8558.

Dec 2-3 (Sat–Sun) Devil’s Den Car Camping /Day Hiking. This 2,000-acre park provides someof the most spectacular Ozark Mountain sceneryin the state. Andrew Kolosseus (913)371-6629.

Dec 9 (Sat) THB Holiday Party. Melissa Blakley(816)741-8200.

Dec 9–10 (Sat–Sun) Cecil Cove Trail Backpack,AR. This 7.4–mile loop trail along Cecil & CoveCreeks on the Buffalo River is an early Christmaspresent. Easy to moderate. Bob Wilshire(913)384-6645.

Dec 16 (Sat) Wyandotte County Park BridleTrail, Kansas City, KS. Filling up on Christmasparty goodies? Walk it off with us as we exploreWyandotte County Lake’s trail. Steve Hassler(913)599-6028.

Jan 6–7, 2001 (Sat–Sun) Winter Campout. Ourtraditional winter trip, with a day hike along theshores of Perry Lake followed by a night ofcamping not far from the cars. Scott Hoober(816)561-0575.

Reflections on a Dry Ye a r

Columbine

Prairie coreopsis

Page 12: You Want Fair Elections? Vote for Proposition B · measures to a vote of the people despite inaction by the legislature. Proposition B would institute a system of pub-lic funding

Nov. 3 (Fri) A night hike at the ShawArboretum will be safe now that the goblinsare gone. Helen McCallie (636)742–4380 (h) or(636)451–3512 (w–toll free).

Nov. 3 (Fri) “Mini Sauk” is calling. Hike toMissouri’s high point and Russell Mountain. Fiveto Seven miles. Cider and cookies afterwards.Should be peak fall colors. Optional overnightcamping before Paul’s backpack. Suzanne Smith(618)281–4762 (after 7:00 p.m., weeknightsonly).

Nov. 4–5 (Sat–Sun) This Taum Sauk Mt.backpack trip takes us to a new area of thestate park. We will see and enjoy great fallcolors. Paul Stupperich (314)429–4352.

Nov. 5 (Sun) Enjoy prime autumn colors andspectacular vistas in the Bell Mt. Wilderness.We’ll hike to the granite summit via the gentlenortheast route. About six miles. Jill Miller(314)427–4226.

Nov. 11 (Sat) Highway cleanup. Are youexperiencing those post election blahs? Let thefull moon draw you to new experiences (trash)and new acquaintances (not trash). DianeDuBois (314)721–0594.

Nov. 11 (Sat) Lemonade volunteers party.Celebrate the close of another successfullemonade season. 6:30 p.m., 905 Lami, Soulardneighborhood. Jim Young (314)664–9392.

Nov. 16 (Thur) Members Slide Show. Showyour outstanding slides at the NovemberGeneral Meeting. 7:30 p.m. Missouri Botanical

Garden. Must call to geton the list ofpresenters. AnnEggebrecht(314)725–1560.

Nov. 25 (Sat) ForestWatchers Field Trip.Find out the differencebetween a selection cutand a clear cut as wediscuss various forestrypractices in the MarkTwain National Forest.

Join us for an informative full day with dinnerafterwards. Ann Eggebrecht (314)725–1560 orHank & Katie Dorst (417)932–4623.

Nov. 26 (Sun) Meramec State Park day hike.Our wrong–side–of–the–river hike goes throughHamilton Hollow to Green’s Cave and beyond.See springs, caves, bluffs, and historical sites.Wayne Miller (314)569–0094.

Dec. 2 (Sat) Help the Sierra club test waterquality conditions on the still pristine FoxCreek. Half day activity. Jim Rhodes(314)821–7758 or [email protected] orLeslie Lihou (314)726–2140.

Dec. 2 (Sat) We will hike a little used sectionof the Ozark Trail. Crossing Trace Creek, we willhike for about eight miles along bluffs and TraceCreek before ending back at our cars. PaulStupperich (314)429–4352.

Dec. 2 (Sat) Holiday party and pot luck dinner.Bring a dish to share. Call for time anddirections. Barb Wall (636)394–6549, MarilynHarlan (314)966–8797, or Ann Eggebrecht(314)725–1560.

Dec. 3 (Sun) “The Morning After” the SierraClub holiday party day hike. Six to seven milesat Rockwoods Reservation. Suzanne Smith(618)281–4762 (after 7:00 p.m., weeknightsonly).

Dec. 8 (Fri) Get some exercise before thoseChristmas cookies start piling on the pounds.Hike six to eight miles on the hills and glades atSt. Francis State Park. Suzanne Smith(618)281–4762 (after 7:00 p.m., weeknightsonly).

Dec. 9 (Sat) Warm up with an afternoon hike atRockwoods. Finish with a fireside dinner at theBig Chief Dakota Grill. Please call by Dec. 6. JillMiller (314)427–4226.

Dec. 9–10 (Sat and/or Sun) Glade restoration.

The tradition continues! Come join us inrestoring native wildflower and animal habitat atWashington State Park. If you like bonfires, thiswork is for you! Come either or both days; stayovernight for free. Susan Farrington(636)583–0948 or leave a message at(314)577–9402.

Dec. 16 (Sat) Become a “highpointer” byvisiting Taum Sauk Mountain with JackLongacre. We will hike five–eight miles on theOzark Trail to get up a good appetite for potluckdinner afterwards. Limit ten. Glenn Wolters(314)845–5859 or Ann Eggebrecht(314)725–1560.

Dec. 17 (Sun) This winter hike into Hawn StatePark takes us to places that are rarely seen bypark visitors. We will hike about eight miles, onand off of the trail. Paul Stupperich(314)429–4352.

Dec. 23 (Sat) For the fifth annual downtownChristmas walk, we will visit the White Castle,the Art Wall, Prairies, and many other works ofart that dot the city landscape. We will walkabout three to four miles. Paul Stupperich(314)429–4352.

Jan. 1 (Mon) For this New Years hike atMeramec State Park. we will add a new gladeand about a half mile to our hike. Six or moregreat views, springs, glades, caves, and manyother sites are waiting for us on this first day of2001. Paul Stupperich (314)429–4352.

Nov 3 (Fri) Gastronomic Outing. Bo Lings,4800 Main. Join us for our monthly dining outat a KC restaurant. Call by October 29 toparticipate. Gale Burrus (816)763-5120.

Nov 4 (Sat) Perry Lake Trail Maintenance,Perry, KS. Join us for another episode in thecontinuing saga of Perry Lake Trail Maintenanceseries. Steve Hassler (913)599-6028.

Nov 5 (Sun) KATY Trail Bike Ride. Ride alongthe Missouri River. Bike rentals available inRocheport. Bob and Doris Sherrick (816)779-6708.

Nov 11 (Sat) Kansas City Zoo and IMAX

Thomas Hart Benton Gro u p

Be sure to check your G R O U Pnewsletter

for m o re or c u rre n t o u t i n g s !

E a s t e rn Missouri Gro u p

continued on page 11

Ozark Sierran N ovember/December ‘ 0 01 2