YOSHIYA NAKAMURA Patent Agent - WHDA
2
YOSHIYA NAKAMURA Patent Agent 703-827-3821 571-395-8753 [email protected] Biography Mr. Nakamura has extensive experience in drafting and prosecuting patent applications in technologies such as applied chemistry, organic and inorganic chemistry, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. He also helps clients realize their goals by providing opinions on patent validity and infringement, and by guiding clients through licensing agreements. Mr. Nakamura has practiced patent law for over 15 years in the U.S. and Japan, including several years of experience as a Benrishi (patent agent) in Japan. Related Services Patent Prosecution Licensing Legal Opinions and Counseling Post-Grant Procedures Related Technologies Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science Life Sciences Education B.S., Biology, 1993, Tokyo Metropolitan University LL.M., Intellectual Property Law & Policy, 2007, University of Washington Languages English Japanese Admissions Japan Patent Office, 1999 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Limited Recognition, 2009 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 2013 © 2022 Westerman Hattori Daniels & Adrian, LLP. All rights reserved.
Transcript of YOSHIYA NAKAMURA Patent Agent - WHDA
YOSHIYA NAKAMURA Patent Agent
703-827-3821 571-395-8753 [email protected]
BiographyMr. Nakamura has extensive experience in drafting andprosecuting patent applications in technologies such asapplied chemistry, organic and inorganic chemistry,pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. He also helps clientsrealize their goals by providing opinions on patent validity andinfringement, and by guiding clients through licensingagreements.
Mr. Nakamura has practiced patent law for over 15 years in the U.S. and Japan,including several years of experience as a Benrishi (patent agent) in Japan.
Related ServicesPatent ProsecutionLicensingLegal Opinions and CounselingPost-Grant Procedures
Related TechnologiesChemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials ScienceLife Sciences
EducationB.S., Biology, 1993, Tokyo Metropolitan University LL.M., Intellectual Property Law & Policy, 2007, University of Washington
LanguagesEnglishJapanese
Admissions
Japan Patent Office, 1999U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Limited Recognition, 2009U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 2013
© 2022 Westerman Hattori Daniels & Adrian, LLP. All rights reserved.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 2013
*Not admitted in D.C.; practice limited to matters and proceedings before federal courtsand agencies.
PublicationsObviousness Found Even When the Burden to Prove Inherency Remains onExaminer, 10.18.2017The On-Sale Bar Under the America Invents Act Does Not Require a Public Disclosureof the Invention, 5.9.2017CAFC’s majority says that a PTO’ decision to institute IPR is not appealable even aftera final decision and a broadest reasonable interpretation rule applies in IPR, 7.22.2015Improper Modification of Cited Art in Obviousness Determination: How to Define“Principle of Operation” or “Intended Purpose” of the Art., 2.11.2015Prima Facie Case of Obviousness is Not Established Solely Because End Point ofClaimed Range is Close to Disclosed Range, 7.31.2014"Weak Prima Facie Case Obviousness vs. Strong Evidence of Non-Obviousness" -CAFC Alert January 22, 2014, 1.22.2014"Applicant's Failure To Request Claim Construction Under §112, 6th Paragraph MayInvoke Waiver Of Such Claim Construction", CAFC Alert, January 23, 2013, 1.23.2013"Mayo v. Prometheus 米国最高裁判決", CAFC Alert, March 23, 2012, 3.23.2012"Interpretation of Statutory Two-Year Time limit for Enlarging the Scope of Claim in aContinuing Reissue Application filed After the Two-Year Window", CAFC Alert, March14, 2012, 3.14.2012"AMP v. USPTO: Myriad Wins This Battle, But Will the War Continue?", CAFC Alert,August 16, 2011, 8.16.2011
© 2022 Westerman Hattori Daniels & Adrian, LLP. All rights reserved.
