Yale lectures 5 and 6

7
Yale lectures 5 and 6 • Nash Equilibrium – no individual can do strictly better by deviating – self enforcing in agreements • Investment game – all invest or no invest. Guess and check. Converges. Mark best alternative given the other player has made a decision.

description

Yale lectures 5 and 6. Nash Equilibrium – no individual can do strictly better by deviating – self enforcing in agreements Investment game – all invest or no invest. Guess and check. Converges. Mark best alternative given the other player has made a decision. Terms. What is a fixed point? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Yale lectures 5 and 6

Page 1: Yale lectures 5 and 6

Yale lectures 5 and 6

• Nash Equilibrium – no individual can do strictly better by deviating – self enforcing in agreements

• Investment game – all invest or no invest. Guess and check. Converges.

Mark best alternative given the other player has made a decision.

Page 2: Yale lectures 5 and 6

Terms

• What is a fixed point?• What does he term a silly Nash

Equilibrium?• In investment game (get profit of $5

if 90% invest, lose $10 if not), what were the two equilibrium?

• Why is it not a prisoners dilemma?• What is the “guess and check”

method of finding a NE?

5,5 -10,00,-10 0,0

Page 3: Yale lectures 5 and 6

Cournot competition• There is more than one firm and all firms produce a

homogeneous product, i.e. there is no product differentiation;

• Firms do not cooperate, i.e. there is no collusion;• Firms have market power, i.e. each firm's output

decision affects the good's price;• The number of firms is fixed;• Firms compete in quantities, and choose quantities

simultaneously;• The firms are economically rational and act

strategically, usually seeking to maximize profit given their competitors' decisions.

Page 4: Yale lectures 5 and 6

Take aways

• We won’t worry too much about the economic aspects of the model, but want to look at what Nash Equilibrium means.

• Does it mean profit is maximized?• Can we agree to do something different and

have that agreement adhered to?

Page 5: Yale lectures 5 and 6

• p1 = firm 1 price, p2 = firm 2 price

• q1 = firm 1 quantity, q2 = firm 2 quantity • c = marginal cost, identical for both firms • profit is given by Π1 = q1(P(q1 + q2) − c)• Equilibrium prices will be: • p1 = p2 = P(q1 + q2) = a – b(q1 + q2)

• u1 = [p]q1 – c*q1

• Can find best response• u1 = (a – b(q1 + q2))* q1 – c*q1 = a q1 – bq1

2 -bq1q2– c*q1

• taking derivative with respect to q1

• 0=a – 2bq1 -bq2– c

• q1 = (a-c)/2b - q2/2

Page 6: Yale lectures 5 and 6

dotted lines show how a series of best responses gets us back to the NE instead of the agreed production level

All along this line, the monopolyquantity is being produced,which is optimal for producers

Page 7: Yale lectures 5 and 6

So what is NE• Consider Q the total amount to produce to

maximize profit• (a – b(Q))* Q – c*Q = aQ-bQ2-cQ• taking derivative a -2bQ –c = 0• Q = (a-c)/2b • So if each does the same, q1 = (a-c)/4b • Would get higher utility if could agree to both

producing less.