YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms,...

Grade % Total %

20%100%

100%

30%

20%

100%

A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0

YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental Design

INAR 0250 Environment & Experience in Game Design 2018-2019 SpringSemester

Student No

Student Name

Lect. Christopher Ferraris (Coordinator)Instructors

TOTAL

TOTAL

60%

25%

15%

Lect. Christopher Ferraris (Coord.)

Signatures

3.1. Experience

3.2. Elements

Grading Scale

1. Homework(25%)

Total Term GradeTOTAL

3.4. Clarity of communication

3.3. Mechanics

25%

25%

1.1. Critical thinking 60%

Evaluation Criteria

EVAL

UAT

ION

2. Project(25%)

3. Final Project(50%)

20%1.2. Accuracy

2.1. Development

2.2. Clarity

2.3. Practice

1.3. Procedure

63Grade %

Submission

Consistency of organization principles and ideas with the composition, comprehension of figure/ground relation, application of invisible guidelines in composition, craftsmanship.

5%

5%

Submission

Consistency of organization principles and ideas with the composition,comprehension of invisible guidelines in composition, the diversity of relations between geometries, pattern potentiality, variation, craftsmanship.

5%

5%

Submission

Abstraction of the animal, choice of abstraction type, appropriate use of scale and proportion, relation between the grids, the use of design principles in composition, the use of appropriate colors, craftsmanship.

5%

5%

Submission

Consistency of organization principles and ideas with the finalized composition, the use of invisible guidelines in composition, the diversity of relation between geometries, dealing with varying shapes and sizes, negative and positive area control, balance, contrast, variation, craftsmanship.

5%

5%Sketch Process Sketching of the ideas 1%

Submission

Evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance of negative- positive areas, the geometries emerged with the intersection of geometries, giving the idea of composition with the principles of design, use of appropriate color scheme, variation, cratsmanship.

6%


Submission

Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance of negative- positive areas, the geometries emerged with the intersection of geometries, giving the idea of composition with the principles of design, use of appropriate color scheme, variation, craftsmanship.

6%


Submission

Ability to deal with 3D relations, control of solids and voids, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance of negative- positive areas, the geometries emerged with the intersection of geometries, giving the idea of composition with the principles of design, use of appropriate color scheme, variation, balance of light and shadow, craftsmanship.

8%

10%

Part 1&2 Grades

Idea development, solid/void relations, open/semi close/close relation of spaces, presentation design and creativity, balanced use of linear/planar/volumetric elements, color and material choices, quality of technical drawings, model quality.

15%

Final Jury

Idea development, solid/void relations, open/semi close/close relation of spaces, presentation design and creativity, balanced use of linear/planar/volumetric elements, color and material choices, quality of technical drawings, model quality.

35%

50%Participation Participation 5%

5%

A 95-100 4,0A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3,0B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2,0C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1,0F 0-49 0,0

Signatures Grading Scale

Lect. (PhD) Emin Özgür Özakın

Project VI 8%

Project VII 10%

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL


INAR 1110 Basic Design for Interior Architecture I 2018- 2019 Spring Semester

InstructorsStudent No

Lect. (PhD) Emin Özgür Özakın Student Name

Final Project 50%

TOTAL

Total Term Grade

Evaluation Criteria

Project I 5%

TOTAL

Project II 5%

TOTAL

Project III 5%

TOTAL

Participation %5TOTAL

Project IV 5%

Project V 7%

Grade % Total %

20%

100%

100%

20%

100%

A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0

Evaluation Criteria


INAR 2252 Modelling & Rendering for Interiors 2018-2019 Spring Semester


Lect. Christopher Ferraris (Coordinator)Lecturers: Ertan Demirkan

Student NameRes.Assist. Cemre Çubukçuoğlu

1.2. Accuracy 20%

1.3. Clarity of Communication

1.1. Use of Technology 60%

2.2. Accuracy 20%

2.3. Clarity of Communication 20%


Grading Scale


TOTAL

3. Final Exam(35%)


3.2. Accuracy 20%

3.3. Clarity of Communication

Total Term Grade

Signatures

Lect. Ertan Demirkan

EVAL

UAT

ION

1. Quiz(40%)

TOTAL

TOTAL

2. Homework(25%)

Grade % Total %

1.1.1.Designing Concepts, Material Boards 1.1.2. Manual And Digital Rendering Techniques1.1.3.Research & Benchmark

100%

1.1.1.Designing Concepts, Material Boards 1.1.2. Manual And Digital Rendering Techniques

1.1.3.Research & Benchmark

100%


100%

1.1.1.Designing Concepts, Material Boards 1.1.2. Manual And Digital Rendering Techniques1.1.3.Usage of Technology, Stylized Renders1.1.4.Research & Benchmark

100%


100%

1.1.1.Benchmark of Architectural Presentation Boards1.1.2.Moodboards 1.1.3.Layout Design & Grid System

100%

1.1.1.Research & Benchmark1.1.2. Warm-Up Projects and Layout Design1.1.3.Designing Concepts, Moodboards, Diagrams

100%

1.1.1.Designing Concepts, Material Boards

1.1.2. Post Production Techniques

1.1.3.Usage of Technology, Stylized Renders

100%

1.1.1.Designing Concepts, Material Boards

1.1.2.Digital Rendering Techniques


100%

1.1.1.Designing 3D Model for AR Integration

1.1.2.Usage of Technology


100%

2.1. Research & Analysis

2.1.1.Benchmark of Architectural Presentation Boards

2.1.2.Moodboards

2.2.1.Layout Design & Grid System2.2.2.Visual Language & Graphic Quality2.2.3.Typography, Colour Scheme2.2.4.Hierarchy & Required Data2.2.5.Legibility

100%

3.1.1.Research & Analysis, Brainstorm, Draft Plan

3.2.1.3D/Mesh Model, Structure3.2.2.Materials, Texture, Lighting 3.2.3.Integration Between Softwares & Interconnectivity

3.3. Implementation of Augmented Reality 50%100%

4.1. Research & Analysis4.1.1.Benchmark of Architectural Presentation Boards4.1.2.Moodboards

4.2.1.Layout Design & Grid System4.2.2.Visual Language & Graphic Quality4.2.3.Typography, Colour Scheme4.2.4.Hierarchy & Required Data4.2.5.Legibility

100%

Grading ScaleSignatures

Lect.Egemen Tamcı A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0

Final Project (40%)

10%

TOTAL

30%

4.2.Layout Design for Architectural Presentation Board

90%

YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental DesignINAR 2290 Visual Presentation Techniques for Interiors 2018-2019 Spring Semester

Student No

Student Name

Egemen Tamcı (Coordinator)Instructors

TOTAL

3.1.Finding Idea & Designing ConceptsTOTAL

2.2.Layout Design for Architectural Presentation Board

3.2.Preliminary Design for Immersive Technology

Classworks_4 Advanced

Section Rendering (%3)

Classworks_1 Manual

Rendering and integration of Digital Media

Tools (%3)

Evaluation Criteria

Mid-term Project (20%)

Immersive Tech. Project/ Case

Study -Pre-Final (10%)

1.1. Environment Design and Manipulation of Interior Renders

90%

1.1. Representation of Interior Architectural Drawings

100%

Classworks_3 Advanced Floor Plan Rendering

(%3)


100%

Classworks_10 Introduction to

Immersive Technology (%3)

Classworks_8 Introduction to Post Production Techniques (%3)

100%

20%

10%


TOTAL

1.1. Augmented Reality in Architectural Representation

100%

TOTAL


100%

TOTAL

TOTAL

1.1. Layout Design for Presentation Board

100%

TOTAL

Classworks_2 Essentials of Floor Plan

Rendering (%3)


100%

TOTAL

100%

TOTAL

Classworks_5 Advanced

Section Rendering

within Time of the day (%3)

Total Term Grade

Classworks_6 Analysis of the Presentation Boards (%3)

1.1. Research & Analysis of Architectural Presentation

100%

TOTAL

EVAL

UAT

ION

TOTAL

Classworks_9 Creating

Diagrams with Collage

Techniques (%3)


100%

TOTAL

Classworks_7 Layout Design of

Infographics (%3)

Grade % Total %1.1. User Profile and Style 5%1.2. Technical Drawings 1/20

1.2.1. Technical Plan 1/201.2.2. Technical Sections and/or Elevations 1/20

1.4.1. Material Information1.4.2. Readibility

15%10%5%

100%3.1. Technical Trip Report 10%

100%3.1. Seminar Report 5%

15%100%

1.1. User Profile and Style 5%1.2. Technical Drawings 1/20

1.2.1. Technical Plan 1/201.2.2. Technical Sections and/or Elevations 1/20

1.4.1. Material Information1.4.2. Readibility

15%10%5%

100%

A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0

Evaluation Criteria

EVAL

UAT

ION

Participation 20%

Final Submission - Bathroom 40%

55%

1.5. 3D Drawings1.6. Materials and Specifications1.7. Reflected Ceiling Plan (Optional- Bonus)

1.4. Presentation Drawings 1/20

1.5. 3D Drawings1.6. Materials and Specifications

Grading Scale

Midterm Submission - Kitchen 30%


1.7. Reflected Ceiling Plan (Optional- Bonus)

55%

1.4. Presentation Drawings 1/20

15%

TOTAL

3.2. Critiques taken

Lecturer Işık Örsel İmir (Coord.)

Signatures

15%

TOTAL

Assignment %10 TOTAL


INAR 3370 - Kitchen and Bath Design 2018-2019 Spring Semester

Student No

Student Name

Lecturer: Işık Örsel İmir (Coord.)Asisstant: İrem Deniz Akçam

Instructors

Grade % Total %1.1. Drawings

1.1.1. Design Evaluation1.1.2. Sketches

1.2. Drawings and Poster Design1.2.1. Orthographic Drawings&3D drawings

100%2.1. Brand

2.1.1. Concept2.1.2. Logo Motto

2.2.1. Plan2.2.2. Elevations

2.3. 3D Representation2.3.1. Concept2.3.2. Quality

100%

3.1.1. Brand Logo3.2.1. 5 Motto3.2.2. Concept3.2.3. Location/Target Customers

100%

Project II -

Assignment 02 (10%) 4.1.1. Orthographic Drawings

4.1.2. Renders

Project II -

Assignment 03 (10%) 4.2.1. Orthographic Drawings

4.2.2. Renders100%

5.1. Brand/Orthographics/Renders5.1.1. Poster Design

100%

A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0


INAR 3391 Commercial Space and Display Design 2018- 2019 Spring Semester

Student No

Student Name

Hasan Can Kulahcioglu (Coordinator)

Res.Assist.Cemre Cubukcuoglu

Instructors

10%

50%

Lect. Hasan Can Kulahcioglu

4.2. Project II

100%

Signatures

Final (30%)

Total Term Grade

50%

TOTAL

3.1. Project II

Grading Scale

34%

TOTAL

2.2. Orthographic

10%

40%

50%

Evaluation Criteria

EVAL

UAT

ION

Mid Term (25%)

Project II - Assignment 01

(10%)

TOTAL

66%

Project I - Competition

(%15)

TOTAL

TOTAL

4.1. Project II

Grade % Total %1. Analyses

1.1 site analyses & documentation1.2 research

100%2. survey

2.1 Application of questionnaires & result diag

2.2 survey result assessment /photos

100%3.ınitial Design skecthes

3.1Design ideas & explanation3.2Initial sketcthes of design

100%

4.1.1.User profile & site analyses4.1.2.Report & Survey

4.2.2Anthropometric dimensions4.2.2. User behaviars, needs & design solutlion

4.3. furniture technical drawings4.3.1.site plan4.3.2. ortographic drawings

25%100%

5. Design revision 5.1.Technical drawings &perspective5.2 scaled 3D cardboard model

100%6.1. Project concept

6.1.1.Site analysis & Survey /Report

6.1.2 Explain the design concept& development process- by text & drawings

6.2.project drawings

6.3.1. site plan/ with surrounding & furniture

6.3.2. furniture plan and orthographic drawin

6.3.3. explain and show materials & finishes

6.3.4 installation detail section drawing/ anthr

6.3.5Rendered perspective drawings /use site

60%100%

7.1. Attendance & participation

7.1.Class attendance

7.2 Completeness of classwork & submissions

100%

Total Term Grade

A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0

Assignmen#4 (10%)100%

TOTAL

4.2. design appraoch

25%

35%4.4. 3Dperspective renders & material suggestion

TOTAL

5%

6.5. 1/1 scale cardboard model

TOTAL

35%

100%

TOTAL

Student Name

4.1. context & user needs

Evaluation Criteria


TOTAL


TOTAL

participation(10%)

final %40

eval

uatio

n


INAR 4451 Street Furniture Design 2018-2019 Spring Semester

Assignment#3 (5%)

TOTAL

100%


Lecturer: Rena Vanli Ballar (Coordinator)

midterm (25%)

15%



37Grade % Total %

100%100%100%

100%

100%100%100%100%

100%100%100%100%100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

1.1. Name, Logo, Motto, Color Palette Proposal reflecting your vision for your company's corporate identity

70%

1.2. Corporate Web Design and UI Design for Mobile Apps

15%

1.3.

Uniform, Packaging/Gift Item/Invitations/Member pins/Promotional Items etc. - Design according to the companies corporate identity and product selection.

15%

100%

2.1. Representations of the Spatial and Corporate Identity Analysis

15%

2.2.Representations of the Idea Development Process

15%

2.3. Design of the Food Spaces and Experiences 50%

2.4. Presentations and Overall Layout 20%

100%

A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0

Evaluation CriteriaParticipation

(%10) TOTAL

EVAL

UAT

ION

Classwork_7 (%2.5)

1.1. Research and Analysing of Food Space Concepts

Classwork_8 (%2.5)

1.1. Designing Easter Eggs for the Food Space

Critics (Practice) (%10) TOTAL

Final Exam (40%)

TOTAL

Midterm Exam (20%)

TOTAL


INAR 4461 Corporate Identity Design2018-2019 Spring Semester


Lec.Egemen Tamcı (coordinator) Student Name

Classwork_2 (%2.5)

1.1. Designing Corporate Logo TOTAL

Classwork_1 (%2.5)

1.1. Brand Outline, Brand Name and Creative Brief

TOTAL

1.2.Designing stationery set100%

Classwork_3 (%2.5)

1.1. Typography for Corporate IdentityTOTAL

Classwork_4 (%2.5)

1.1. Color Palettes for Branding

TOTAL

TOTAL

Classwork_5 (%2.5)

1.1. Research and Prototype of Corporate Web SiteTOTAL

Classwork_6 (%2.5)

1.1. Static Mockup of WebsiteTOTAL

TOTAL

SignatureLect.Egemen Tamcı

Grading Scale

Total Term Grade

Grade % Total %

20%100% 25

100% 25

30%

20%

100% 50

100

A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0

1.2. Accuracy

2.1. Development

2.2. Clarity

2.3. Practice

1.3. Procedure

60%

Evaluation Criteria

EVAL

UAT

ION

2. Project(25%)

3. Final Project(50%)

20%

Grading Scale

1. Homework(25%)


3.4. Clarity of communication

3.3. Mechanics

25%

25%

1.1. Critical thinking

TOTAL

TOTAL

60%

25%

15%


Signatures

3.1. Experience

3.2. Elements


INAR 4481 Interiors in Serious Game Design 2018-2019 SpringSemester

Student No

Student Name

Lect. Christopher Ferraris (Coordinator)Instructors

Grade % Total %1.1. Research

2.1.1.Data Collection2.1.2.Analysis

2.2.1.Building Program-Scenario2.2.2.Diagrams, mood board

1.3. 2D Drawings2.3.1. Plans, sections, elevations

100%

2.1.1. Concept Idea

2.1.1. Plans, sections, elevations-1/50

30%

2.3. Presentation 25%100%

3.1. Desk/panel critics, class works, reflections3.1.1. Completeness of requirements3.1.2. Content

100%

A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1

A. Can Aysan

Letter Grades

TOTAL

Total Term Grade


2.2. 3D Drawings

TOTALDesk/Panel Critics, Class

Work, Reflections

(homework) (20%)

20%

TOTAL

Project II-Jury 3-Final (50%)

2.1. Project Brief15%

2.1. 2D Drawings30%

Project 1 Mid-term (30%)

30%

1.2.Design Concept30%

40%

Student Name

Evaluation Criteria


INAR 4484 Yacht Interiors 2018-2019 Spring Semester


A. Can Aysan

Grade % Total %1. Project list

1.1 Project information and images1.2 Project Analyses

100%2. cover page and content

2.1 Page dimension & design2.2Project selection & list order

100%3. Sample project layout

3.1 Layout creativity, types, font selection3.2 project readabilitiy

100%4. Resume

4.1 Design, font selection4.2 Format, information

100%5.1. Page design

5.1.1.Layout types5.1.2.Layout design

5.2.1 Readability5.2.2. Clarity of expression

5.3. Completeness of portfolio5.3.1. Creativiy level5.3.2. Number of projects& pages

15%100%

6.Cover letter & Business card6.1.Business card & logo design 6.2 Firm research & letter format

100%7. Web site design & QR code

7.1 Project types & images7.2 Project and self information

100%8.1. Design & organization

8.1.1.Layout design & types

8.1.2 Font & titles

8.1.3 Readability

8.2. completeness of portfolio

8.3.1. Creativiy

8.3.2. Number of projects& pages

8.3.3. Project text & keywords

15%10%15%

9.1. Attendance & participation

9.1.Class attendance

9.2 Completeness of requirements

100%

A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0

25%

30%

Evaluation Criteria


Lect. Rena Vanli Ballar

Student Name


INAR 4490 Portfolio for Interior Architects 2018-2019 Spring



TOTAL


TOTAL

midterm (25%)

30%5.2. Articulateness of organization

5.4. Resume /cvTOTAL


TOTAL


TOTAL

final (40%)

30%

30%

8.3. Busines card

8.4. Resume

8.5. Website

TOTAL

participation (10%)100%

TOTAL

Total Term Grade

EVAL

UAT

ION


TOTAL


TOTAL


YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms,...

Documents

Transcript of YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms,...