X-ray diagnostics of plasma deposited thin layers
Transcript of X-ray diagnostics of plasma deposited thin layers
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
X-ray diagnostics of plasma deposited thin layers
Harm WulffUniversity of Greifswald Institute of Biochemistry
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Introduction
The phenomena associated with plasma
surface interactions involve an interesting mix of plasma physics, ion-solid collision physics, surface chemistry, and materials science.The deposition of films by plasma techniques as well the plasma
treatment of solid walls are well known and widely used methods. Nevertheless, the fundamental mechanisms of
plasma wall interaction are not yet understood in detail. To understand the complexities involved in plasma wall interaction it is necessary to take a close look at the substrate area. The substrate area is subjected to plasma radiation and especially to fluxes of energetic and reactive charged and neutral particles in various excited states.Of
particular interest is the analysis of film properties in the nanometre range.Grazing incidence diffractometry
(GIXD) and X-ray reflectometry (XR), have been established as well-suiting tools for investigation of chemical, physical and crystallographic properties of thin films and surface layers. Besides the X-ray methods also other analytical techniques can be used to give
information on surfaces and deposited films. In our plasma-wall interaction studies we have used XPS for chemical analysis and AFM for surface morphology characterization. The properties of plasma deposited films and plasma treated surfaces decide finally whether and for which purposes films or surfaces can be used for special tasks. In this chapter the basic principles of the x-ray techniques will be presented, that are the grazing incidence
diffractometry
(GIXD) and the X-ray reflectometry (XR), which can be used successfully. By means
of examples the efficiency of the x-ray methods will be demonstrated. These involve the characterization of ITO films, deposited on Si(100), especially the influence of oxygen gas flow and substrate voltages and studies of the alumina (Al2
O3
) formation during microwave plasma treatment of aluminium-films.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Model of plasma-wall-interactions
desorption
defectsimplantation
sputtering
surface-reactions
neutral particle
ion
adsorption
isle
formationdiffusion
substrate
Plasma-surface-interactions
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Plasma surface interaction
This model shows the interaction of plasma species with solid surfaces. Chemical reactions, diffusion processes, particle deposition, defect formation and sputter processes can take place and
show the very complex behavior during plasma wall interaction.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Film property
X-ray method Alternatives
phase composition GIXD:Bragg angle, intensity
TEM
chemical composition (concentration depth profile)
GIXD: Bragg angle EDX, XPS, RBS, ERD
macrostress GIXD: Bragg angle substrate curvature, laser optics
grain size GIXD: line profile, line width
TEM, SEM
microstrain GIXD: line profile
preferred orientation GIXD: intensity, polfigure
crystal structure GIXD:Rietveld analysis, structure refinement
thickness GIXD: intensity XR: Kiessig fringes
interferometry, ellipsometry, TEM
density XR: critical angle of total reflection
ellipsometry
surface roughness interface roughness
XR: amplitude of Kiessig fringes
SEM, ellipsometry, AFM
diffusion behavior in situ GIXD, thermal and time resolved: intensity
SIMS, AES, combined with sputtering
crystallization rate melting point
in situ GIXD, thermal and time resolved: intensity
Survey of X-ray and alternative methods
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Table Survey of x-ray and alternative methods
This table shows important and fundamental film properties and the x-ray methods which can detect these characteristics.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Schematic diagram of grazing incidence X-ray diffractometry (GIXD), 2θ
Bragg angle, ω
angle of incidence
substrate
layerdiffraction angle 2Θ
divergence slitx-ray source
incidence angle ω
monochromator
detectorwindow
detector
SOLLER slit
GIXD, assymmetric
Bragg case
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
GIXD
Thin polycrystalline films can be studied with advantage in a highly asymmetric Bragg case.In this technique the diffraction volume can be increased by decreasing the angle of incidence.In the schematic diagram of grazing incidence x-ray diffractometry
the optical path in GIXDcan be seen.The very asymmetric Bragg case reflection with a small incidence
angle ω
as well as thetechnique with specularly
reflected x-rays are labeled “grazing incidence x-ray diffraction”. There is no clear conceptual separation between these two techniques in the literature.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Advantage of GIXD-geometry for thin film investigations compared to conventional Bragg-Brentano measurement method
2 (degrees)Θ
int e
n sit y
(cp
s)
20 30 40 50 60 70 800
500
1000
1500
Ti TiTi
Si substrate(I>4000)
GIXRD
Bragg-Brentano
Ti
Ti
GIXD and BB: x-ray pattern
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
X-ray pattern
The x-ray patterns of a 50 nm thick Ti layer on a Si(100) wafer measured in normal Bragg-Brentano geometry (BB) and in the asymmetric case (GIXD) are displayed in this figure. The reflection positions are equal in both techniques for polycrystalline films, but in the GIXD technique the substrate reflections are suppressed and the intensities of the Ti reflections strongly increase.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Information depth, asymmetric Bragg case
Information depth of Cu Kα
radiation depending on incidence angles, calculated for 0.05, 0.1 and 0.5µm thick In films
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.5 µm
0.1 µm
0.05 µm
incidence angle ω (degrees)
info
rmat
ion
dept
h T
(µm
)
The film information depth T
depends on the thickness x0
, the mean absorption coefficient µ
of the film material and the incidence angle ω
of the
X-ray
beam:
( ))exp(110 Zxµ
ZµT ⋅⋅−−
⋅=
with
)2sin(1
sin1
ωθω −+=Z
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Information depth, asymmetric Bragg case:
In the analysis of layers, the information depth T
of x-rays is an important factor, in particular, if gradients of structure parameters occur in the films.
For indium films with a thickness of about 50 nm to 100 nm the influence of “omega”
is only small, but in 500 nm thick films the information depth can be ruled. In this case the prove of “gradients”
is possible.The film information depth T
strongly depends on the thickness x, the mean absorption coefficient µ
and of course on the incidence angle “omega”.
A further advantage of GIXD compared to the normally used BB geometry is, that the information depth is independent of the Bragg angle 2θ.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
ωοE0
Bragg
planes
ΘB
diffracted
wave
EsEhωh ωο
transmittedwave
Specular
wave Specular
wave
GIXD: Bragg case, specularly
reflected
The wave Eh
is generated by the Bragg diffraction of the specularly
reflected wave Es
.The most important fact is that Eh
principally contains information on the structure of verythin surface layer.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
GIXD, Bragg case, specularly reflected
For angles of incidence below the critical angle
ωc
the penetration depth perpendicular to the surface is in the order of nanometers, determined by the evanescence of the electrical field.
This GIXD is a scattering geometry combining the Bragg condition
with the conditions of x-ray total external reflection from crystal surfaces.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Penetration depth and reflectivity at grazing angles
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
103
GaAs / CuKα1
criti
cala
ngle
ωo
=|χ0
|1/2
pene
tratio
n de
pth
[A]
specularreflectivity
incidence angle [degree]
100
1
0.1
0.01
10-3
10-4
10-510
104
105
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Penetration depth and reflectivity of x-rays at grazing incidence
This provides superior characteristics of GIXD as compared to the other diffraction schemes in the studies of thin surface layers, since penetration
depth of x-rays inside the slab is reduced by three orders of magnitude, typically from 1-10 µm (normal BB geometry) to 50-500 nm (asymmetric Bragg case) to 1-10 nm in the Bragg case, specularly
reflected.
λπ
ρσχω ⋅Σ
+Σ===
i
iA
AfZrN
2)(2 02/1
00
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
X-ray reflectometry
X-ray reflectometry around the critical angle of total reflection allows:•
determination of film thickness•
mass density•
surface and interface roughness•
irrespective of the crystalline structure.
X-ray reflectometry is equally well
applicable to crystalline, polycrystalline andamorphous materials
It only requires a sufficient flat sample
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Schematic diagram of X-ray reflectometry
substrate
layerreflection
angle Θincidence
angle ω
divergence
slit
reflectedincident x-ray
x-raysource
detector
Geometry of XR
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
The basic principle is shown in this figure. In case of thin films on a substrate constructive interference occurs between the beam reflected at the surface and the beams reflected at the interfaces.
Constructive interference results in intensity maxima called “Kiessing
fringes”, whose angular spacing is characteristic for the thickness of a layer.
Geometry of X-ray reflectometry
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
XR: simulation silicon/aluminum/air
Simulation of the reflectivity of a 30 nm Al-layer on Si with different roughness σ1
(air-Al) and σ2
(Al-Si) : curve a: σ1 = σ2
= 0 nm;
curve b: σ1
=2 nm, σ2
= 0 nm;
curve c:
σ1
= 0 nm, σ2
= 2 nm; curve d: σ1
= σ2
= 2 nm.
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
2ΘC
d
b
ca
inte
nsity
2Θ (degrees)
distance between the interference fringes
film thickness x
angle of total reflection density of the layer ρ
decrease of intensitysurface roughness σ
attenuationinterface roughness σ
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
X-ray reflectometry simulation
Reflectometry simulations for a 30 nm thick aluminum layer on a silicon
substrate demonstrate the influence of various surface and interface roughnesses.
These simulations were made with the program LEPTOS from Bruker
AXS.
The value of the critical angle of total reflection 2Θc
can be used to determine the mass density ρ
of a deposited film.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Characterization of ITO films, deposited on Si
(100) substrates by means of dc-planar
magnetron sputtering.
Influence of oxygen gas flow and negative substrate voltages
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
dc-planar magnetron sputtering
bias-voltagesubstrate
Target
Experimental
sputtering-parameter
0 W, 350 V, 85 mA
Target metallic In/Sn (90/10) Substrate Si(100)-wafer
base
pressure
10-8
mbar
sputter
pressure
5,6•10-3 mbar
sputtering
gas 15 sccm argon
reactive gas 0 ... 2 sccm oxygensubstrate voltage 0, - 50, -100 VDeposition time 120 s
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Equipment dc magnetron sputtering
The films were deposited by reactive dc magnetron sputtering.The target material was metallic In/Sn.The reactive gas was oxygen. The gas flux was varied between 0 and 2 sccm. Substrate voltages of 0 V, –50 V and –100 V were applied.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
GIXD: phase
analysis
Diffraction patterns of ITO-films deposited at different oxygen flows, Usub
= 0 V
26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
100
200
300
400
500
In(1
10)
In(0
02)
In(1
01)
USub= 0 V
2.0 sccm O2
1.5 sccm O2
1.0 sccm O2
0.5 sccm O2
0 sccm O2
2Θ (degrees)
inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
GIXD, phase analysis
During deposition, the oxygen flow influences chemical and phase
composition.Deposition without oxygen forms crystalline metallic In/Sn
films. No preferred orientation was observed. The intensity ratios are similar to those of the x-ray pattern of polycrystalline bulk In. With increasing oxygen flow only small amounts of crystalline metallic In/Sn
can be detected in the layers. Oxygen flows higher than 0.5 sccm prevent the formation of a crystalline phase.
A disadvantage of x-ray diffraction methods is the fact that only crystalline materials can be investigated. X-ray amorphous or amorphous materials do not give information on chemical or crystallographic properties.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
GIXD: In situ phase analysis
26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 sccm O2USub= 0 V
In (1
10) 3
In (0
02) 2
In2O
3 (40
0)3
In2O
3 (22
2)x
In (1
01) x
as-deposited
after 1h at 200°Cafter 4h at 200°C
after 7h at 200°C
after 12h at 200°C
2Θ (degrees)
intensity (a.u.)
Annealing
process
-
in situ
high temperature
diffractometryPhase transformation of metallic In/Sn
to crystalline ITO at 200°C
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
GIXD in situ phase analysis (annealing)
The films were deposited without substrate heating. Due to a post deposition heat treatment the phase transformation of metallic In/Sn
to crystalline Indium-tin-oxide can be observed.After an annealing time of 1h at 200°C no metallic In/Sn
is detectable with GIXD. The new peaks can be identified as reflections from the In2
O3
in the bixbiyte
structure type.
Post deposition treatment is often used to improve the crystallinity
and therefore the desired properties: high conductivity and high transparency in TCO films.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
X-ray reflectivity measurements of films deposited at different oxygen flows, Usub
= 0 V: 0 sccm O2
, thickness 15.1 nm, roughness 1.52 nm;
1 sccm O2
, thickness 11.5 nm, roughness 0.98 nm; 2 sccm O2
, thickness 7.1 nm, roughness 0.75 nm
0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0103
104
105
106
107
108
0 sccm O2
1 sccm O2 2 sccm O2
Inte
nsity
(cps
)
2Θ (degrees)
XR: film thickness, density, roughness
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
XR: film thickness, density, roughness
Film thickness and roughness in dependence of the oxygen flow in
the deposition chamber are presented in the figure.The results are from x-ray reflectivity measurements. For these x-ray reflectometry measurements the deposition time was kept constant (30 s). Without oxygen (the black curve) the film is 15.1 nm, with 1 sccm 11.5 nm and with 2 sccm oxygen the thickness is 7.1 nm.
The thickness decreases with increasing oxygen flow and this also holds for the surface roughness of the films.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Gas composition influence film properties and film growth
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0
4
5
6
7
8
0 V
dens
ity (g
cm
-3)
oxygen flow (sccm)
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
deposition rate (nm s
-1)
Density ( ) and deposition rate (•) of samples deposited at0 V substrate voltage vs. oxygen flow
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Gas composition influence film properties and film growthdensity and deposition rate
From the x-ray reflectometry results film density and the deposition rate can be calculated. The dependence of film density and growth rate on oxygen flow in
the deposition chamber are presented in the next figure. Without oxygen the growth rate is 0.6 nm/s and decreases to 0.2 nm/s for an oxygen flow of 2 sccm. Simultaneously the layer density increases from 4.5 g/cm3
to 7.2 g/cm3. An oxygen flow higher than 1 sccm leads to film densities similar to bulk values of indium or indium oxide (7.28 und 7.12 g/cm3,
respectively)The small densities in the more metallic films suggest a high amount of voids in the these films. Increasing oxygen flows yield more compact layers. The drop of the roughness confirms this assumption. The assumption of voids in the more metallic films is also supposed by AFM images.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
AFM images support the x-ray results
AFM micrographs, samples deposited (a) without O2
and (b) at 1.5 sccm O2
; Usub
= 0 V, deposition time 30 s
2000 nm
0 nm
1000 nm
2000 nm0 nm 1000 nm
2000 nm
0 nm
1000 nm
2000 nm0 nm 1000 nm
a) b)
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
AFM images support the x-ray results
AFM micrographs of these films clearly demonstrate that grains become smaller with increasing oxygen flow. The metallic film shows large grain sizes forming a rough film surface. Deposition with higher oxygen partial pressure causes a
smooth surface, grains are not clearly observable.
XPS measurements confirm the existence of oxygen besides In and Sn.
These experimental results show that the coatings become x-ray amorphous with increasing oxygen flow and that these amorphous layers contain the ITO (indium tin oxide) phase.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Diffraction patterns of films deposited at different oxygen flows, Usub
= -50 V
26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
50
100
150
200
250
USub = -50 V
In(0
02)
In(1
01)
2.0 sccm O2
1.5 sccm O2
1.0 sccm O2
0.5 sccm O2
0 sccm O2
2Θ (degrees)
inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
Negative substrate voltage works like a reduced oxygen flow
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Negative substrate voltage works like a reduced oxygen flow
To obtain further information on the effect of energy flux due to ion energy the substrate voltage U
was changed from 0 to –50 V or –100 V at the same oxygen flows. The additional energy flux to the growing films (due to increased ion energy) can be responsible for changes observed in diffraction patterns and also in film properties.
There are noticable
differences in the profiles and peak positions and therefore in the microstructure between the 0 V samples and films
deposited at –50 V.An increased amount of metallic In/Sn
in the films was detected in films deposited at –50 V substrate voltage although the supply of oxygen in the discharges remains the same as in 0 V experiments.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Substrate bias influences film properties and film growth
Density ( ) and deposition rate (•) of samples deposited at 0V, -50V and –100V substrate voltage vs. oxygen flow
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0
4
5
6
7
8
-100 V-50 V0 V
dens
ity (g
cm
-3)
oxygen flow (sccm)
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
dep. rate (nm s
-1)
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Substrate bias influences film properties and film growth
Film density and growth rate show a similar dependence on oxygen
flow as it was observed for films deposited without negative substrate voltage.However, the measured densities have smaller values, particularly in the middle field from 0.5 to 1.5 sccm and the films grown at 0.5 sccm to 2 sccm oxygen flow exhibit growth rate higher for –50 V and –100 V substrate voltage. From these results one can draw the conclusion that the negative
substrate voltage works like a diminished or reduced oxygen flow. This means that in the plasma are appreciable amounts of negative oxygen ions.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
-50V
30 32 34 36 38
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2Θ (degrees)
in
tens
ity (a
.u.)
0V
Lattice defects in thin surface layers influence x-ray data
X-ray pattern In/Sn:line shape and line position wereinfluenced by negative subtrate
voltage
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Lattice defects in thin surface layers influence x-ray data
If we compare the indium x-ray profiles at 0 V substrate voltage and the x-ray profiles of a film deposited at –50 V substrate voltage we can observe that the peak profiles are broadened and the peak position is shifted to
higher angles due to the additional ion energy flux to the growing films.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Characterization of defect structures
by x-ray investigations
The line shift of broadened profiles is defined by the centre of gravity.
The shape analysis of diffraction peaks essentially comprises three problems: (I)
extraction of the pure physical line profile from the experimental profile,(II)
unraveling of the contributions of various types of lattice imperfections to the physical line profile and
(III)
quantitative estimation of substructure parameters.
Lattice defects in thin films can influence x-ray data. Defect structures are partially or wholly manifested by diffraction intensity, line shape, or the change in line shape with respect to the diffraction angle 2θ. Imperfections of the first type, such as point defects, displacement disorders or substitution disorders, shift the line position; imperfections of the second type such as domain sizes or dislocations act on
the
diffraction line shape.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
X-ray profiles:
g(x) ideal, h(x)
with defects
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
X-ray profiles: g(x) ideal, h(x) with defects
The experimentally observable diffraction line profile of an x-ray reflection h(x)
is the convolution of a physical line profile f(y)
caused by lattice disorder of the second type and an instrumental line profile g(x).
X-ray profile analysisThe profile g(x)
was determined with a standard material that contains no defects, strain or particle size broadening. LaB6
, a SRM (standard reference material) from NIST was used. The apparatus function g(x)
is separated from the experimental measured profile h(x).
The applied method was the Stokes Fourier series.
The Fourier coefficients F(L)
of the resulting physical line profile f(y)
contain information on particle size P, mean strains due to internal stresses, which are constant within a crystallite or a subgrain
S, and restricted randomly distributed dislocations D.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
X-ray
profile
analysis
∫ −∗= dyyxgyfxh )()()(
)()()(
LGLHLF =
STOKES method
F(L), H(L) G(L) are the Fourier Transforms of f(x), h(x) and g(x)normalized to
1)0()0()0( === GHF
and
)(hkldnL ∗=)(hklTT =
)(hklBB =0L
domain of definition of experimental line profile
effective particle size
mean total dislocation density
length proportional to the core radius r0
of the strain field of dislocation
mean square microstrain
due to internal stress>>=<< )(22 hklεε
)()()()( LALALALF dsp ∗∗=
20
2 )/ln(/)(ln LLLBKTLLF ⟩+><⟨+=− ε
))/ln(exp()exp()/exp()( 20
22 LLLBLKTLLF −∗><−∗−= ε
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
WARREN-AVERBACH-plot
KRIVOGLAZ-WILKENS-plot
LLKTLLF ><+=− )(/1/)(ln 2ε
LBLBKTLLLF ln)ln(/1/)(ln 022 −+><+=− ε
X-ray profile analysis: single line
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
X-ray profile analysis: single line
On the base of the Warren Averbach
theory or the Krivoglaz-Wilkens
theory microstrains
and dislocation densities can be calculated.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
Fourier coefficients of the physical line profile
F(L)
nL
0 V -50 V -100 V
In/Sn
films: results of the line profile analysis (i)
Cosine Fourier coefficients of the evaluated physical line profiles
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
In/Sn films: results of the line profile analysis (i)
From the linear part of a plot Fourier coefficients versus the domain ofdefinition of the experimental line profile the mean domain sizes can be estimated. The differences in the curves depending on the substrate voltage
can be clearly seen.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
0 10 20 30 40 50
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
- ln
[F(L
)]/nL
nL / nm
L = 3.07nm
-100V
0 V
-50V
WARREN-AVERBACH-plot
of In(101)-Reflection
In/Sn
films: results of the line profile analysis (ii)
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
In/Sn films: results of the line profile analysis (ii)
This is a typical WA plot. From the slope information on the mean micro strain can be obtained.
The KW-plot gives information on the dislocation density.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Physical parameters of In/Sn
films deposited at various substrate voltages
Usub 0 V -50 V -100 V T / nm 74 43 71 <ε2>1/2 1,87·10-3 2,14·10-3 1,98·10-3 ρV / cm-2 0,56·10-11 1,10·10-11 0,64·10-11 d101 / Å 2,718 2,714 2,717 ΔV / V reference -0,00455 -0,00149
Strong influence of negative substrate voltage on film microstructureIn the -50 V samples the crystallite growth is strongly disturbed, domain sizes are small and microstrain
and dislocation density are high. The peak shift to larger 2θ
values can attribute to contraction of the unit cell due to an increasing concentration of vacancies in these films.The defect concentration of the films deposited without negative
substrate voltage and at Usub
= -100 V are similar, but significantly smaller than
that of the -50 V samples.
The development of the defects in the -100 V samples is not quite clear. We assume that the increase energy flux increases the mobility of the In-atoms. Thus more often regular lattice positions can be occupied.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Study of Al2
O3
formation during microwave plasma treatment of Al films
in Ar-O-gas mixtures
The next example concerns the kinetics of aluminum oxide formation during a microwave plasma treatment of Al-films in different Ar/O2
gas mixtures and different plasma powers.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Motivation
I
Which influence do chemical reactive (O) or chemical non-reactive plasma (Ar) exert onto thin Al-layers (wall)?
II
How do plasma activated gases affect the structure and the composition of the coatings ?
III
How do plasma-activated species influence the kinetics of the formation or modification of the layers ?
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
schematic diagram of the plasma chamber
substrate holder
thin
Al films
microwaveincoupling
mass
flow
controller
Working pressure 4*10-1 mbar gas Ar/O2(1), Ar/O2(2), O2, gas flow 20 sccm microwave power 200 W, 700 W, 1100 W process time 10 min to 1 h
process
parameters
Oxygen partial pressure at total gas flow of 20 sccm
Ar/O2
(1) pO2
= 1.5x10-6
barAr/O2
(2) pO2
= 2.6x10-6 barO2 pO2
= 6.1x10-6
bar
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
schematic figure of the plasma chamber:
The Al-coatings used in this experiments were prepared by thermal evaporation of Al on Si
(100) wafers. The typical thickness of the Al-layers was determined by x-ray reflectometry to 30 to 60 nm. The plasma treatment experiments were carried out in microwave plasma chamber SLAN. The Al-samples were laid onto a substrate holder, which is centered in the quartz tube of the plasma reactor.Plasma power P, gas composition and exposure time were varied. The used gases were Ar/O2
(1), Ar/O2
(2) and oxygen.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Characterization of plasma treated Al-
coatings
•
Grazing Incidence X-ray Diffractometry (GIXD)
•
X-ray Reflectometry (XR)
-
interference of the beam reflected at the surface and the interface layer-substrate
-
distance between the interference fringes film thickness x- angle of total reflection density of the layer ρ- decrease of intensity surface roughness σ- attenuation interface roughness σ
•
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
•
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 800
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
(311)
(220)
(200)
(111)
ω = 1.0
ω = 0.5
inte
nsity
[a.u
.]
2 theta [°]
diffractogram
of an untreated Al-layer at different incident angles
GIXD: Phase analysis
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
GIXD: Phase analysis
The x-ray patterns of a 50 nm thick untreated Al-
layer at different incident angles confirm the existence polycrystalline al films. These patterns are typical for polycrystalline fcc
Al. There is no preferred orientation. In our first test with Ar/O2
-gas and different plasma power we could observe, that also in Ar/O2
-gas with only small amounts of oxygen the intensity of the Al reflection decreases, but the whole film thickness increases to more than 50 nm. Therefore we drew the conclusion, that also in Ar/O2
-gas mixtures with small oxygen concentrations chemical reactions take place.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Determination of the
partial pressure
of oxygen
with
a potentiometric
O2
-sensor
(ZIROX®)
pO2 decreases
withincreasing
microwave
power
reduced fraction of molecular O2 in plasma
Fraction
of activated
oxygen
ϕactive
at different powers
and gases
ϕactive (200 W) ϕactive (700 W) ϕactive (1100 W) Ar/O2-plasma (1)
0.00274 0.00313 0.00342
Ar/O2-plasma (2)
0.0364 0.0677 0.087
O2-plasma 0.0457 0.1501 0.2104
ϕactiveO without plasma O with plasma
total
p pp
=−
2 2, ,
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
0,0
1,0x10-6
2,0x10-6
3,0x10-4
4,0x10-4
5,0x10-4
6,0x10-4
O2-plasma Ar/O(2)-plasma Ar/O(1)-plasma
p O2 [b
ar]
microwave power [W]
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
By means of a potentiometric
oxygen sensor we could determine the partial pressure of oxygen for Ar/O2
(1), Ar/O2
(2) and oxygen gas. This potentiometric
oxygen sensor was now used to determine the fraction of activated oxygen species in the plasma for the different plasma gases and in dependence on plasma power.
Plasma off:The measured values are the normal oxygen partial pressures in the used gas (neutral O2
).
Plasma on:The values are the partial pressures of only molecular oxygen. The molecular oxygen partial pressure pO2
decreases with increasing microwave power. That means we have a reduced fraction of molecular oxygen
in the plasma. From the difference between partial pressure of molecular oxygen
without plasma and with plasma we can calculate the portion of activated oxygen species (atomic O, ions …) in the recipient.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
20
40
60
80
100
140
9 h8 h
7 h6 h
5 h4 h
3 h2 h
1 horiginal
2 theta / °
int /
cps
formed
Al2
O3
is
x-ray amorphous quantitative
description was madeindirectly by determinationof the decrease of Al(111) integral intensity in combination with the total thickness of the film
Decrease
of the
integral intensity
of the
Al-(111)-reflection after
each
1h plasma
oxidation
(O2, 700 W)
Decrease of the Al integral intensity confirms the chemical reaction
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Decrease of the Al integral intensity confirms the chemical reaction
The figure shows the decrease of the Al (111) peak intensity after each 1 hour of plasma exposure.
These values correlate very well with the results of the reflectometry measurements.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
0.5 1.0 1.5layer thickness roughness dens. [nm] [nm] [g/cm3]Al2O3 2 1.7 2.9Al 49 0.7 2.7Al2O3 1 0 3.4 Si 0.3 2.3
as-deposited fit
inte
nsity
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
1h plasma oxidation fit
layer thickness roughness dens. [nm] [nm] [g/cm3]Al2O3 22 1.9 2.9Al 34 2 2.7Al2O3 1 1 3.0 Si 0.6 2.3
0.5 1.0 1.510-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
4h plasma oxidation fit
layer thickness roughness dens. [nm] [nm] [g/cm3]Al2O3 39 2.7 2.9Al 23 1 2.7Al2O3 1 0.6 3.0 Si 0 2.3
2 theta/°
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.010-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
7h plasma oxidation fit
layer thickness roughness dens. [nm] [nm] [g/cm3]Al2O3 41 2.4 2.9Al 18 3 2.7Al2O3 1 0.4 3.0 Si 0 2.3
X-ray reflectometry measurements
Overview of the Al samples, oxidized in plasma for 1h, 4h and 7h in comparison to the as-deposited layer. The values in the legend present the film parameters.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
X-ray reflectometry measurements Reflectivity curves
Four reflectivity curves are shown in figure. The values in the legend demonstrate the film parameters obtained from the simulation with the simulation
program REFSIM. The best fit can be obtained with the assumption of four layers.
The two top layers describe the chemical reaction of Al (aluminum) to Al2
O3 (alumina). The whole thickness in the as deposited film is 51 nm, the whole thickness
after 1h plasma oxidation is 57 nm.
From the decrease of the Al layer thickness the converted part of Al film can be determined. From these values the maximum amount of stoichiometric
Al2
O3
which could have formed is easy to calculate. We only need the densities of Al and Al2
O3
from the x-ray reflectivity simulation.
x
is the film thickness, ρ are the densities, M
the Molecular weight.
The film thickness of Al follows for the supposed densities, and
with the molecular weight of Al and Al2
O3
, that 1 nm Al metal gives 1.75 nm Al2
O3
.
3232
32OAl
OAl
OAlal
Al
Al xM
xM
⋅=⋅ρρ
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
0 200 400 600 800 1000 12000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
O KVV Auger
C 1s
O 1s
Al 2sAl 2p
inte
nsity
[a.u
.]
energy [eV]
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 50093
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
original Al-layer
after 9x1h microwave plasma (O2)
trans
mis
sion
[a.u
.]
wave number [cm-1]
XPS spectrum
of an oxidized Al- layer
(9x1h, Ar-plasma)
FTIR-spectra,
band at 950 cm-1
corresponds to LO-vibration
of Al-O bonds
in case
of microwave induced
plasma
oxi-
dation, stoichiometric Al2
O3
will be
formed,
independent of plasma
gas composition
Characterization of amorphous films: XPS, FTIR
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Characterization of amorphous films: XPS, FTIR
XPS and FTIR measurements confirm the formation of Al2
O3
. The composition of the oxide film, expressed as the O/Al atomic ratio, was found to be 1.5 from the total intensity of the O 1s main peak and the oxidic
Al 2p main peak of the XPS spectrum.
FTIR spectroscopy of plasma oxidized films also confirm the stoichiometry
to be Al2
O3
.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
2000 nm
0 nm
1000 nm
2000 nm0 nm 1000 nm
2000 nm
0 nm
1000 nm
2000 nm0 nm 1000 nm
AFM -
images of Al2
O3 formed by plasma oxidation in Ar-microwave plasma
Al, as deposited P = 700 W
AFM images reveal changes in surface layers
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
AFM images reveal changes in surface layers
This figure shows the AFM images of Al2
O3
formed by plasma oxidation in Ar/O2
microwave plasma.The increase in the grain size of the upper layer after treatment in an Ar/O2
plasma for 9 hours at 700 Watt is obvious. Potentially the upper
atomic layers are still crystalline, but GIXD is not sufficiently sensitive to detect these small crystallites.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
9x1h Ar-plasma, 1100 W, ω:1.0
fit functionx = 10.5 * √t - 1.5 * t +x0, Al2O3
calculated data-set fit experimental fit
oxid
e th
ickn
ess
x [n
m]
time t [h]
-
oxide growth follows -law diffusion determined process
-
simultaneously going sputter process limits the oxide formation
Calculated thickness of
formed alumina in comparison to the experimental determined ones.The difference is caused by a sputter process.t
t
formation of alumina
theoretical function
tbx =
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Formation of alumina
In the x-ray pattern only reflections of the Al-film could be observed, indicating that the Al oxide formed was x-ray amorphous. From the measured thickness of the untreated Al-film (from x-ray reflectometry) and from the integral intensity of the Al (111) peak (GIXD) the thickness of residual Al was calculated after each oxidation step. Together with total thickness of the Al/Al2
O3
coating, this enabled us to estimate the produced amount of aluminum oxide (red curve). From the balance of the number of moles, with consideration of measured oxide densities (from x-ray reflectometry) it is possible to calculate the amount of oxide which is theoretically expected (black curve). The oxide film growth is clearly shown. Dry thermal oxidation by
heating a pure Al-metal surface to a maximum temperature of 573 K (300°C) without plasma effects solely the formation of the well known 2 nm native oxide layer. The fit-function for theoretical values of oxide thickness x
is x = b*sqrt
referring to a diffusion limited process. The deviation of the experimental results from the theoretical data-set is attributed to a linear sputter process. The experimental data follow the function x = b*sqrt
t-at, with b
the diffusion rate constant and a
the sputter rate.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
mm xztxmA ),(e μ−=
( ) ( )( ) . 110
10
1
n
x
mnmnm
m
dxCC
xff μμμμμμ +−−+−= ∫
∫=d
mm dxAtxCAIKBtI0
m000 C),( )( ∂∂
∂∂
C x tt
DC x t
x( , ) ( , )
=2
2
C x tC n
n d xd
en
n
n Dtd
'
'( , ) ( )
cos0
1
1
2 121
4 12 1
2 12
2
2= −
−−
− −⎛⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟
−
−
∞ −−⎛
⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟
∑ππ
π
Fick´s
second law
0.0 0.5 1.0
dx
d
xm
0
C/C0
x
0.0 0.5 1.0
xm
0
d
Am
x
dxm
dxdV=Adx
substrate
w 2Θm
I0 dIm
layer
Determination of diffusion coefficients from time dependence of x-ray reflections
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Determination of diffusion coefficients from time dependence of x-ray reflections
The basic idea is that the x-ray integral intensity of a volume element depends on the concentration ratio, which is a function of time. The mean absorption coefficient changes with plasma operation time due to chemical reaction.On the base of Fick´s
second law and a linear sputter process we have developed a mathematical model for calculation of the diffusion coefficient D
and the sputter coefficient S.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Diffusion coefficient
D
and sputter
rate S
in dependence
on the
incoupled
microwave
power
D
and S
increase
with
incoupled
microwave
power
as well as with
increasing
oxygen
in the
plasma.
200 400 600 800 1000 12000,0
1,0x10-16
2,0x10-16
3,0x10-16
4,0x10-16
5,0x10-16
6,0x10-16
7,0x10-16
O2-plasma Ar/O (2)-plasma Ar/O(1)-plasma
diffu
sion
s co
effic
ient
D [c
m2 /s
]
power [W]200 400 600 800 1000 1200
1,0x10-4
1,5x10-4
2,0x10-4
2,5x10-4
3,0x10-4
3,5x10-4
4,0x10-4
4,5x10-4
5,0x10-4
sput
ter r
ate
S [n
m/s
]
O2-plasma Ar/O (2) plasma Ar/O (1)-plasma
power [W]
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
D and S increase with microwave power as well as with increasing oxygen in the plasma
This figure shows the diffusions coefficients and the sputter rate S in dependence on the microwave plasma.At constant power D
increases as the amount of activated oxygen in the plasma is increased. D
also increases with increasing microwave power.Because of the effect of microwave power on the kinetic energy of the plasma particles an increasing number of defects is incorporated in the aluminum films and the oxide layers. This causes a subsequent penetration of activated oxygen
trough the oxide film to the Al-film coating and oxide can be produced more quickly.
The sputter rate S
depends on plasma power and plasma gas mixture. Both, the kinetic energy of plasma particles and the amount of activated oxygen, obviously influence the sputter process.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Arrhenius-plot: Determination of activation energy EA
Activation energies EA
point to a similar diffusion mechanism
EA
for thermally induced oxidation fcc
Al:
EA
= 131.2 kJ/mol
(lattice diffusion)
EA
= 69.1 kJ/mol
(grain boundary diffusion)
1,7 1,8 1,9 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5-38,5
-38,0
-37,5
-37,0
-36,5
-36,0
-35,5
-35,0
EA =19.0 kJ/mol
EA =23,4 kJ/mol
EA=23,2 kJ/mol
O2-Plasma (700W) fit O2-Plasma (200W) fit Ar/O-Plasma (700W) fit
ln D
1/T [10-3K-1]
320 300 280 260 240 220 200 180 160 140
Θ [°C]
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Activation energies EA point to a similar diffusion mechanism
The activation energy EA
for the diffusion process in microwave plasma was calculated in usual way from the Arrhenius
plot. The activation energies point to a similar diffusion mechanism irrespective of the microwave power and the used plasma gas mixtures. The values are
clearly smaller than the activation energy for thermal induced oxidation
of aluminum. For thermal induced diffusion in fcc
aluminum the activation energies are -131 kJ/mol (lattice diffusion) and -69 kJ/mol (grain boundary diffusion).The different reaction path compared to a thermal stimulated process can be assigned to atomic or ionic species even at comparatively low temperatures.
As expected, the sputter rates are independent of temperature in
the temperature range under investigation.
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Summary•
thin Al-coatings were oxidized in a microwave plasma
•
kinetic description of the process was realized using grazing incidence x-ray techniques, additional diagnostics were XPS + FTIR
•
for the first time a different fraction of activated oxygen species in dependence on gas composition and power was measured using a potentoimetric oxygen-sensor
•
formed Al2
O3
is x-ray amorphous, quantitative description of oxide growth was made indirectly by the decrease of the reacted Al metal
•
the oxidation is a diffusion determined process, a sputter process limits the growth of Al2
O3
•
diffusion coefficients D
and sputter rates S
were simulated using a mathematical model considering the time-dependent decrease of integral intensity of Al-reflections
•
D
and S
depend on the fraction of activated oxygen species in the plasma
•
a model for the oxidation process of aluminium in a microwave discharge was deduced
H.Wulff summer school „complex plasmas“, Hoboken 2008
Summary
•
Grazing incidence x-ray diffractometry
and x-ray reflectometry (in combination with XPS and AFM) were used to study non destructive the microstructure of thin films as well as the influence of plasma parameters on microstructure and film formation processes.
•
The examples were aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of x-ray methods to investigate plasma treated surfaces
•
Four types of diagnostic methods have been discussed, which are
of interest to investigations of plasma treated surfaces
-
Phase analysis-
Defect structure analysis
-
Film formation analysis-
Study of kinetic processes