x Change Management

download x Change Management

of 22

Transcript of x Change Management

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    1/22

    Change Management

    StrategyM.L. Markus and R.I. Benjamin

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    2/22

    Purpose

    To stimulate information systems

    specialists efforts to become more

    effective and credible agent of

    organizational change

    To improve organizational effectiveness in

    order to avoid IT implementation failures

    at great cost in money, organizational

    competitiveness, and individual careers.

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    3/22

    Introduction Why do IS specialists need to become better

    agents of organizational change?

    Reasons

    New IT is an organizational intervention

    Need to know how to market How IT is implemented is a major factor in the

    results organizations achieve from new ITs.

    Change Agentry will become a large part of IS

    work Outsourcing of in-house technical IS work

    Organization-specific knowledge stays in-house

    IT Implementation and change management issuesare unlikely to diminish

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    4/22

    Introduction (contd)

    Reasons (contd)

    To improve IS specialist credibility

    Strong mutual relationship between credibility andchange management skill

    Effective IS specialists act out of the box

    Transform not only their interpersonal

    relationships with clients, but also behavior ofmanagers and users in IT projects and decision

    making

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    5/22

    Issues Disagreement in both theory and practice

    3 models on what change agents do andwhy

    Traditional IS model

    Facilitator model Identified in various Organizational Development

    (OD) text, (Schwarz (1944)and Cummings and Huse(1989))

    Advocate model Originated from the innovation, management, and

    change politics literatures, (Kanter et al.,1992;Rogers, 1995)

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    6/22

    Traditional IS model

    Technology causes change

    No change responsibilities beyond building

    technology

    The managers pair of hands Not responsible for achieving change or

    improvements in organizational

    performances

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    7/22

    Consequences Widespread systems failures for social reasons

    Perspective in handling users training

    Groupware Implementation

    IS inhibiting change

    Technology standards

    Personal/group interest: Learning & Costs

    Low IS credibility

    Outsourcing: Poor financial performances

    Poor interpersonal skills Heterophilous (different in background, beliefs systems &interests

    Lack value congruence

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    8/22

    Structural Conditions

    IS specialists are sole providers of services

    Clients have limited technical and sourcing

    options

    Low budget pressure existsLack of external competitions

    IS specialists rewarded based on functional

    unit goals

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    9/22

    The Facilitator model

    Clients make change using technology;technology does not

    Facilitators

    Promote change

    Avoid exert power/other power over clients

    Serve interests of all clients

    Not responsible for changes; clients areresponsible

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    10/22

    Consequences

    Greater attention to building user capacityTo increase project success and IS credibility

    Emphasis on client self-sufficiency

    To reduce client resentment & increase IScredibility

    New information technologies provide

    greater opportunities to IS specialists as

    facilitators than as experts/builders

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    11/22

    Structured Conditions

    FacilitatorNot a client group member

    Lies outside the hierarchical chain-of-command

    Not formally responsible for business resultsValuable expertise will be negated

    Authority for organizational control

    Sending mixed messages

    Authority for technical outcomes

    Concerns about locus of employment

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    12/22

    The Advocate Model

    People make changeIdentifying and direction of change

    Advocate influence change target as

    desirable More flexible in accepting change

    Whatever works

    Serve the organizations best interests eventhere are personal or professional conflicts

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    13/22

    Consequences

    Benefits from using advocate model Managers unaware of how IT can be deployed

    Sharing traditional IS specialists belief

    Technology to create organizational change

    IS specialists to add business value

    Advocating process change & user skill training

    Emphasis on communication

    Lack of communications

    CIOs, CEOs, Managers, IS analyst and users

    Change agentry is a contact sport Increase Credibility and communications

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    14/22

    Consequences (Contd)

    The advocate role may fit the issues of ITinfrastructure

    Todays challenge

    To ensure levels of commonality

    Interoperability to support internal/externalcommunication & future flexibility

    Public goods problem

    Advocate uses consensus decision-making

    approach To negotiate the political shoals of IT infrastructure

    development

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    15/22

    Structural Conditions

    2 assumptions to define the change agentsrole

    1st assumption

    Involve in govt funded/public organizationsTactics:

    communicating/empathizing with change targets

    Gaining targets confidence (social station &

    attitudes)

    Working through the targets opinion leaders

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    16/22

    Structural Conditions

    2nd assumption on change agents roleAdvocates are line managers

    Mandate and enforce changes do not work

    Applying behavior modeling, changingorganizational symbols, displaying of power

    Problems:

    Lack of line mgmt authority

    Lack of direct authority over users and the managerswho funded the project

    Require Senior executive to initiate and support thechange project

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    17/22

    Implications

    IS specialist have different levels of skill inclient contact & involvement in bringing

    organizational change Suggestions:

    Intellectually familiar with, behaviorallyskilled in, and highly adaptable to the 3

    models

    To increase credibility and contribute toorganizational success with IT

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    18/22

    Research Agenda

    Educational Reform To improve interpersonal or soft skills

    Debate about the place of soft skills training in IS and other

    technical curricula.

    Proposed a change in the relevant content and outline a program

    structure in IS academics.

    Role plays using case scenarios are the best ways to foster

    affective and behavioral learning. computers and society course be the first course in the track.

    Effectively engage them in the intellectual level, setting the stage

    for later behavioral and affective growth.

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    19/22

    Research Agenda (contd)

    Educational Reform (cont) Promotes the development of insight and perspective before

    the student takes more technical subjects later on.

    Second course will focus on interpersonal skills in the IS

    context to complement cognitive skills development. It will cover individual differences (cognitive, affective,

    behavioral) and the students own personal style.

    Active listening skills, interpersonal conflict, interviewingtechniques.

    Recognition of, and intervention in, group and intergroup

    dynamics. The last course will be the course in change agentry, the last in

    the soft skills track.

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    20/22

    Research Agenda (contd)

    In-house training and development is necessary because the structural aspects of their jobs are likely

    to jeopardize their credibility.

    Partner with neutral internal training staff or academics to

    design/conduct training.

    Make participation voluntary and avoid including bosses and

    their subordinates.

    Dont worry excessively about the training materials at first.

    Document and disseminate the key lessons learned to buildinterest in others in attending subsequent trainings.

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    21/22

    Research Agenda (contd)

    IS professional ethics Ethical dilemma arises from their change agent roles: when

    interests differ, whose interests are to be served?

    Ethical codes prepared for computer science community did

    not address these issues.

    IS community needs a separate code that specifically addresses

    the ethical dilemmas faced by in-house IS professionals, to

    tackle in house change agentry role in particular.

  • 7/30/2019 x Change Management

    22/22

    Conclusion Obstacles

    Differing views about what it means to be a change agent,

    inhibiting progress.

    Many IS specialists do not see any need to change.

    Structural barriers to change in the change agentry role, esp.over-reliance on technical expertise, control authority, and an

    inappropriate reward system.

    Positive Prospect

    IS managers and executives structural abilities as effectivechange advocates

    Voluntary efforts on the part of IS departments to relinquish or

    share the control that their clients resent.