Www.nationaleducationtrust.net Sheila Nolan Director of School Improvement...
-
Upload
rosalyn-harmon -
Category
Documents
-
view
230 -
download
2
Transcript of Www.nationaleducationtrust.net Sheila Nolan Director of School Improvement...
www.nationaleducationtrust.net
Sheila Nolan Director of School Improvement
Greater emphasis on:
•Judging the progress made by different prior attainment groups – not an agregate score
•Consistency of the progress made by all groups
•Achievement of the MOST ABLE + PP•Curriculum – NEXT STEPS
OUTSTANDING-•Significant growth in students ’knowledge and
excellent attitudes to learning’•Thoughtful and wide-ranging promotion of SMSC….and their physical development…..
•Teachers authoritatively impart knowledge….and use well judged imaginative strategies….together with clearly directed and
timely support and intervention match individual needs accurately.
SUBSIDIARY GUIDANCE•It is not appropriate to evaluate achievement
according to students’ type of disablity or special educational need.
•Judgements on achievement should be based on an evaluation of their learning and progress from their starting points as measured by any
assessment measures held by the school.•Inspectors must consider the impact of these outcomes on the school’s overall attainment.
Available National Data on progress made by pupils below L1 of the
National Curriculum at KS1 or KS2should contribute to the evaluation
of achievement alongside anyadditional analysis of progress
carried out by the school.
National data are available as part of RoL and in the
Progression Materials 2010-11•IEPs should be linked effectively
to the Progression Matrices 2010-11 and RoL Transition
Matrices.
•Starting point for evaluation is that expected progress is the median level for pupils’ ages.•Inspectors should evaluate the
school’s arrangements for ensuring the accuracy of its
performance data when considering P-levels . There is no
statutory moderation of P-scales.
Behaviour and SafetyAre reasonable adjustments
made for pupils from within the specialist resource base to allow
them to be included in school life?
•Are staff familiar with the guidance on the use of force and
restraint?
Questions to consider•Specialist advice and training for unit staff and mainstream
staff?•Does the environment promote the inclusion of the pupils from
the unit ?•Do all staff use resources and equipment appropriately for
these students?
•What is the effectiveness of joint working with other
professionals in improving the outcomes for students?
•How well are these pupils prepared and supported in making decisionsabout the
future?
•Are those of you who have EYFS ensuring that children between 2 and 5 years are
following the EYFS curriculum?
•How well does the whole-school/unit curriculum raise
apirations and promote realistic progression opportunities?
•Are there any particular safeguarding risks?
•Do you track communication skills, lieracy and numeracy for
these students?
•How is this carried out in mainstream classes?
•How well do teaching staff plan thoroughly for the deployment
of specialist support staff?•How well do they make use of agreed specialist approaches,
advice or equipment?•Are staff knowledgeable about any gaps between the outcomes
for those pupils from the resource base and mainstream
pupils?
Post-16 students•Has the best possible outcome
for these students been established?
•Has a pathway been developed to get there?
Post-16 studentsCommunication
Independence for livingHealth and Wellbeing
Development and Expression of selfCommunity Participation and
inclusionDeveloping and maintaining
Relationships
- age and starting point- highlights individuals and groups
- effectively moderated- objective, flexible and broad- challenging and informative
- purposeful qualifications- relevant to next step or stage
- cross-referenced across subject areas- destinations and sustainability
- attendance and retention
CRITERIA