Www.healthcare.ac.uk Use of Multiple-Mini Interviews in student nurse selection (A values based...
-
Upload
harry-reed -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Www.healthcare.ac.uk Use of Multiple-Mini Interviews in student nurse selection (A values based...
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Use of Multiple-Mini Interviews in student nurse selection
(A values based approach to selection)
Beattie Dray
Principal Lecturer: Recruitment and retention
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Outline
• Evidence base: historical, longitudinal
• Practicalities
• Key principles
• Context of mental health
• Student perspective
• Data analysis
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Evidence base
Perkins, A. 2013 Evaluation of a multiple-mini-interview protocol used as a selection tool for entry to an undergraduate nursing programme
Nurse Education TodayVolume 33, Issue 5 , Pages 465-469, May 2013
www.healthcare.ac.uk
How it works
A series of different, short ‘interviews/activities’ rather than a single long interview
Five minutes in each ‘station’ before moving on to the next
Range of different activities that involves:- responding to scenarios - explaining thinking
- responding to questions- role play
Sense of reality through pressure to complete task- have to make decision
Minimal interaction reduces subjective prompting, rescuing
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Context of Mental Health
• Communication skills
• Conceptual thinking- clinical competencies
• Non-Judgemental approach
• Empathy, recognising and responding to distress
• Realistic expectations of field
• Self awareness, ability to self manage
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Scenario/question development
• Themes relate to potential to meet NMC standards : problem solving skills, communication skills, ability to demonstrate empathy, non judgemental approach, commitment to chosen field, self awareness, leadership and management
• Additional requirements, importance of honesty and integrity
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Ratings
• Numerical score 1-5
• Qualitative comments: unacceptable, acceptable , excellent
• Standardisation through structured guidance
• Qualitative comments
www.healthcare.ac.uk
How decisions are made
• Combination of numerical score and qualitative comments
• Decisions made based on combination of agreed acceptable minimum numerical score and agreed maximum unacceptable comments
• Process of moderation allows for contextualisation of decision making
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Resources
• Physical resources: classroom – screens-electronic timer
• Staff resources: 5x assessors, steward/administrator, 5 applicants, half an hour
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Enhanced equality
• Reduced subjective bias, more people involved in process reduces individual influence
• All other of selection are separated from specific scenario assessments
• Standardised guidelines encourages diversity of assessors e.g. students, service users, external HEIs
• Minimal interaction reduces bias
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Flexibility of approach
• Institutional owner ship, partnership approach to scenario development: use of clinical partners, students, service users
• Principles of MMI approach may be developed to meet differing needs e.g. level of interaction
www.healthcare.ac.uk
New initiatives
• Use of film clips
• Personality infantry scores: pilot of new tool
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Data analysis
• Allows for longitudinal analysis of performance of students: enhances evidence base of reliability of tool
• Analysis can focus on specific themes e.g. poor communication skills, poor problem solving skills
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Feedback as developmental tool
• Can be used to add development of those unsuccessful
• Use of feedback as template for personal action plan for successful applicants
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Implications
• Reduced attrition
• Reduced misconduct
• Selection tool as enhancer of
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Further considerations
• Implications to workforce planning and development
• Evidence of deficits of current educational/development delivery
• Pre- entry development strategies: focusing on developing principles of emotional intelligence
www.healthcare.ac.uk
Bibliography
• Dray, B. 2013. Revealing the real student. Nursing Standard 27, No. 25:P.64
• Dray, B. 2010. Numeracy requirements for admission to undergraduate degree Programmes. Journal of Further and Higher Education 34, No.1: 83-96
• Elcock, K. 2013. Getting Into Nursing . Sage: Learning Matters