WTO shrimp turtle - case - Guillaume Houdremont
-
Upload
guillaume-houdremont- -
Category
Business
-
view
62 -
download
2
Transcript of WTO shrimp turtle - case - Guillaume Houdremont
Shrimp & Sea Turtle Dispute US vs Asian countries
Panel’s involved in the dispute
• GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade):
provided the rules for much of world trade
• DSB( Dispute Settlement Body): Malaysia, India,
Thailand, Pakistan: against section 609 and lost
• Appellate body: United States supports section 609 and
won
Issue
• US concern that shrimp were caught in an
environmentally harmful way due the incidental
killing of sea turtles
• US requiring shrimp exporters to use TEDs according
to WTO
• 1989, law posed prohibiting the importation of
shrimp
• Mid 1990, law enforced globally
• May 1996, embargo on imports from non-complying
nations
• Asian Countries complained to the WTO
Turtle Excluder Device(TED’s)
• A turtle excluder device or TED is a
specialized device that allows a captured sea
turtle to escape when caught in a fisherman's net.
In particular, sea turtles can be caught when
bottom trawling is used by the commercial shrimp
fishing industry
Role of WTO
• WTO founded that the import ban in shrimp and shrimp
products as applied by the United States is inconsistent
with Article XI:1 of the GATT 1994
• WTO ( the Appellate body), partially Reversed the panel’s
original decision
• Two years later, WTO investigated the Appellate body’s
decision
• DSB’s report on US’s full compliance and ruling is in their
favour
• US agreed to remove Section 609 but keep prohibition on
non-TED shrimp and offered technical support
Ruling & opinion
• DSB ruled the section 609 an illegal import restriction
• US compliance investigated
• DSB rules in favour of US due to discovery of their
compliance
• We agree with the ruling: rules are rules and have to
be obeyed
• But in our opinion decisions to be made on trade
should be on a mutual agreements with other member
nations especially the developing countries (Asian
countries in this case) which might be the victim of
such situations
HIDDEN REASON behind the government intervention
• US local industry affected
by Asian shrimp
importation
• Lower cost advantage
from Asian countries
• TEDs implementation
affected the company’s
profitability
• Politics involved to
include China in the ban
Thank you for your attention
What is your opinion about the dispute ?