WRITE IN THIS - CLEAN FINAL 2012 CAP document Web viewAPPEAL NAME MID-YEAR REVIEW 2012 17. 8 APPEAL...

2012 APPEAL MID-YEAR REVIEW DOCUMENT TEMPLATE

Save a copy of this file and use it as your appeal document (deleting the instructional text highlighted in yellow, or sample text).

Type where the Latin “filler” text appears (“Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet…”); this will ensure that your text has the right formatting, which will allow us to publish your MYR faster. If you copy and paste text, please paste it in the filler text; it should snap to the right formatting for that section, while preserving your bolds and italics. Please don’t change the standard formatting,* except for bold, italics and underlines.

CAP Section will now work in Office / Word 2010. However, if you only have Word 2003, you can download a “compatibility pack” free from Microsoft, which will allow to edit and save Word 2010 documents.

To ensure fast HQ processing time for your CAP document, you should write according to these guidelines (click to open hyperlink):Style-checking GuidelinesWriting and Editing Guide

* STANDARD FORMAT:A page is defined as one A4 size sheet of paper (width 21cm, height: 29.7cm)Margins: Right: 2.5cm, Left: 2.5cm, Top: 2cm, Bottom: 2cm.Paragraph settings:

Body text font and size: Arial, 10.5 ptLine spacing: Multiple, 1.25Spacing before paragraph: 0ptSpacing after paragraph: 10ptAlignment: Full JustifiedBody text colour: Black

Tables:Body text font and size: Arial, 9 ptLine spacing: Multiple, 1.1Spacing before paragraph: 2ptSpacing after paragraph: 2ptAlignment: Left JustifiedBody text colour: OCHA Blue (R: 2, G: 108, B: 182)

Writing tip: CAP MYR documents should be thorough but concise. They can summarize and refer to more detailed information available elsewhere. If you are clear on what’s important to say, you’ll write more concisely.

Writing tip: Make your 2012 CAP MYR less text-heavy – use tables, charts, graphics, and links to on-line resources to tell the story, present the evidence and outline the plan. Make your document visually appealing – see the on-line Best Practices page (items 9-12) for examples of good graphics.

Writing tip: each paragraph should have a beginning, middle and end. The beginning introduces the paragraph’s subject. The middle presents all key facts and arguments. The end makes clear the point of the paragraph. (If you cannot define the point of the paragraph, consider omitting it.)

[cover – to be inserted by CAP]

SAMPLE OF ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS

AARRECACF

ACTEDADRA

AfricareAMI-France

ARCASBASI

AVSICARE

CARITASCEMIR

InternationalCESVICFACHFCHFICISVCMA

CONCERNCOOPI

CORDAIDCOSV

CRSCWS

DanChurchAidDDG

Diakonie Emerg. Aid

DRCEM-DH

FAOFARFHI

FinnChurchAidFSDGAA

GOALGTZGVC

Handicap International

HealthNet TPOHELP

HelpAge International

HKI

Horn ReliefHT

HumedicaIA

ILOIMC

INTERMONInternews

INTERSOSIOMIPHD

IRIRCIRDIRINIRW

Islamic ReliefJOINJRSLWF

Malaria Consortium

MalteserMercy Corps

MDA

MDMMEDAIR MENTORMERLIN

Muslim AidNCANPANRC

OCHAOHCHROXFAM

PAPACTPAIPlan

PMU-IPremière Urgence

RC/GermanyRCO

Samaritan's PurseSave the Children

SECADEVSolidarités

SUDO

TEARFUNDTGH

UMCORUNAIDSUNDP

UNDSSUNEP

UNESCOUNFPA

UN-HABITATUNHCRUNICEFUNIFEMUNJLCUNMASUNOPSUNRWA

VISWFPWHO

World ConcernWorld Relief

WVZOA

APPEAL NAME MID-YEAR REVIEW 2012 4

Table of Contents1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................1

TABLE I. Requirements and funding to date per cluster................................................................5TABLE II. Requirements and funding to date per priority level........................................................5TABLE III. Requirements and funding to date per organization........................................................5

2. CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT, HUMANITARIAN NEEDS, AND RESPONSE........................62.1 CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT.............................................................................................62.2 SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO DATE................................................................................62.3 UPDATED NEEDS ANALYSIS.............................................................................................62.4 ANALYSIS OF FUNDING TO DATE....................................................................................6

3. PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND SECTORAL TARGETS. .83.1 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES..................................................................................................83.2 CLUSTER RESPONSE UPDATES....................................................................................10

3.2.1 CAMP COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENT...............................................103.2.2 EARLY RECOVERY...................................................................................................143.2.3 EDUCATION...............................................................................................................153.2.4 EMERGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS..................................................................153.2.5 FOOD SECURITY.......................................................................................................153.2.6 HEALTH...................................................................................................................... 163.2.7 LOGISTICS................................................................................................................. 163.2.8 NUTRITION................................................................................................................. 163.2.9 NUTRITION................................................................................................................. 163.2.10 SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS...........................................................................173.2.11 WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE......................................................................17

4. FORWARD VIEW.........................................................................................18

ANNEX I: LIST OF PROJECTS AND FUNDING RESULTS TO DATE...........................20TABLE IV. List of appeal projects (grouped by cluster), with funding status of each.......................20TABLE V. Total funding to date per donor to projects listed in the appeal......................................20TABLE VI. Total humanitarian funding to date per donor (appeal plus other).................................20TABLE VII. Humanitarian funding to date per donor to projects not listed in the appeal..................20TABLE VIII. Requirements and funding to date per Gender Marker score........................................20TABLE IX. Requirements and funding to date per geographical area.............................................20

ANNEX II: [IF NEEDED]...................................................................................21

ANNEX III: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS....................................................22

Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available on http://unocha.org/cap/. Full project details, continually updated, can be viewed, downloaded and printed from http://fts.unocha.org.

http://fts.unocha.org/

http://unocha.org/cap/


[MAP]

Consolidated Appeal for Countryname:Key parametersDuration: January – December 2012Key milestones in the rest of 2012:

SadfasdfsadfAsdfasdfsadfAsdfasdffafsadfaAsdfasdfsadfdsf

Target beneficiaries:

AsdfsadfAsdfAsdfasdfasdfasdfAsdfasdfsadfsdfaAsdfasdfsaf

Total funding request:

$1,233,444,555

Funding request per beneficiary:

$255


1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua.1

1 Footnote example

Key FiguresXX millionE.g. Food insecure people(source, as of DD Mmm)

XX million

XX million

BaselinePopulation(source ‘YY)

XX m

GDP per capita(source ‘YY)

$XXX

% pop. living less than $1.25 per day(source ‘YY)

XX%

Life expectancy(source ’YY)

XX years

Under-five mortality(source ‘YY)

XXX/1,000

Under-five global acute malnutrition rate(source ’YY)

XX%

% of pop. without sustainable access to an improved drinking water(source ‘YY)

XX%

XXXX(source ‘YY)

XXX

(Do not repeat indicators from the basic humanitarian and development indicators)

FundingXX millionrequested (US$)

XX% funded

Country_name Humanitarian Dashboard (as of day month 2012)

Crisis Description Overarching statement Most affected areas: Most affected groups: Main drivers of the crisis:

Progress towards Strategic Objectives1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod

tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua

2.3.4.5.

Restate your strategic objectives and summarize if possible the achievementstowards these objectives, against the indicators selected at strategic level

People in Need

XX maffected people

XXX,XXX# targeted by hum. partners

%people reached (% of targeted pop.)

XX maffected people

XXX,XXX# targeted by hum. partners

%people reached (% of targeted pop.)

Cluster Overview

CCCM

Food Security

WASH

Health

Shelter

Education

Nutrition

Protection

Early Recovery

Logistics

Emergency Telecom.

4,045

3,001

2,600

2,600

2,500

2,500

2,500

2,500

1,344

1,300

1,171

3,034

623

2,600

2,600

1,540

1,540

1,535

1,372

1,344

1,300

1,171

98

571

327

803

162

709

550

1,142

1,143

198

175

3%

92%

13%

31%

11%

46%

36%

83%

85%

15%

15%

%reached vs targeted Reached Targeted

People reached (% of targeted)

# of people in need, targeted and reached by cluster (in thousands)


Title, unit

J F M A M J J02468

1012141618

Indicator1 Indicator2 3

Title, unit

J F M A M J J02468

10121416

1 2 3

Evolution of Needs Trend: xxxx Evolution of priority needs: xxxxx Most likely scenario of needs: xxxx Worst case scenario: xxxxx

Progress of Response and Gap AnalysisProvide an explanation of the above bar chart on the cluster overview referring also to operational constraints. Highlight any changes in cluster targets.

Clusters Response and gap analysis Clusters Response and gap analysis

E.g. CCCM

E.g. Capacity and funding constraints have significantly limited the cluster’s implementation rate. Currently only 3% of targeted beneficiaries are covered.

Country_name Humanitarian Dashboard (as of day month 2012) Complement with graphics as deemed useful to support analysis


Additional basic humanitarian and development indicators for [country name]Sector Most recent data Previous data

or pre-crisis baseline

Trend *

Health

Maternal mortality /100,000 live births Number of health workforce (MD+nurse+midwife) per 10,000 population

/10,000

Measles vaccination rate (6 months-15 years)

Number of cases or incidence rate for selected diseases relevant to the crisis

Food Security

% HH according to food consumption score (<21, 21-34, 35+)

Other relevant food security indicator

WASH

Number of litres potable water consumed per person per day in affected population

Proportion of the population practising safe excreta disposal

Other vulnerability indices

ECHO Vulnerability and Crisis Index score

V:C:

IASC Early Warning - Early Action rating

Also:

* The symbols mean: ↑ situation improved; ↓ situation worsened; ↔ situation remains more or less the same.


TABLE I. Requirements and funding to date per cluster

TABLE II. Requirements and funding to date per priority level

TABLE III. Requirements and funding to date per organization

[CAP Section will generate and insert these once the figures are final. You can check running project totals on OPS, and funding to date on FTS. Please communicate any funding news that FTS is missing to [email protected].]

mailto:[email protected]


2. CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT, HUMANITARIAN NEEDS, AND RESPONSE2.1 CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT (No need to repeat in detail what you put in the CAP, if the context has not changed significantly.)

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr.

2.2 SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO DATE (Each cluster response plan will present details of their outputs to date vs. targets, below in Section 3. This section should therefore summarize which parts of the response are on target, and which have deviated from plans and why, and how this affects progress towards strategic objectives.)


2.3 UPDATED NEEDS ANALYSIS(Each cluster response plan in Section 3 will present a brief updated cluster-specific needs analysis. This section should therefore illuminate the interactions and priorities among needs.)


2.4 ANALYSIS OF FUNDING TO DATE To what extent has the funding response to the CAP been adequate, timely and flexible? What is being funded outside the CAP, and why was it not counted in the CAP? (See FTS

Table H.) Has funding increased or decreased compared to the midpoint of previous years, and why? Have donors responded to the prioritization scheme in 2012? (See FTS table on funding

response per priority level.) Did clusters work with donors to direct funds to the most urgent projects? What have been the effects of under-funding in the various clusters? To what extent have pooled funds improved the quality and efficiency of humanitarian action

(like funding clusters neglected by donors)? How were allocation decisions made for CERF or other pooled funds?

At a minimum, you should present and interpret the following statistics (all available on FTS): ► requirements and funding per cluster or sector; ► requirements and funding per priority level; ► amount of funding inside the CAP vs. outside (and which sectors have a lot of funding outside

the CAP, and why); ► funding as of mid-2012 compared to the same point of previous years, inside CAP and overall

(see previous MYRs for those figures).


Include at least one table/graph that illustrates the key point(s) that you want to make about funding. Please see FTS suggestions about how to present this information or contact FTS for further guidance ([email protected]).



3. PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND SECTORAL TARGETS(Describe any necessary changes in the strategic objectives, indicators and targets from those in the original 2012 CAP. Otherwise, reproduce your CAP’s strategic objectives, indicators and targets on the tables below, and add achievements to date. Add narrative as needed to explain each result.)


3.1 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVESLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo.

Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year

[e.g.] Health care service utilization rate among the population

[e.g.] 0.5 newcontact/person peryear

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo.





(Add more tables for additional strategic objectives as needed.)

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo.


3.2 CLUSTER RESPONSE UPDATES

3.2.1 CAMP COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENT

Summary of updated cluster response planCluster lead agency UNITED NATIONS XYZ FUND

Cluster member organizations ASDBDF, ABCDE,

Number of projects 5

Funds required Original: $16,439,509Revised at mid-year:

Funds required per priority level $12,345,677

Funding to date $12,345,677 (ZZ% of requirements)

Contact information Charlie Brown, [email protected]

Categories and disaggregated numbers of affected population and beneficiaries

Category of people in needNumber of people in need Number of targeted beneficiaries Number of people covered

Female Male Total Female Male Total Female Male Total

asdfasdf 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345

asdf 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345

asdf 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345

Total 457890 457890 457890 457890 457890 457890 457890 457890 457890

Note on definitions for this table: Affected people (not shown on this table) include all people whose lives have been affected in some way by the

crisis. Not all affected people need humanitarian aid.


People in need comprise those affected people who require humanitarian aid in some form. People in need are thus a sub-group of affected people.

People targeted comprise all people the cluster system is trying to assist. This will likely be a sub-group of people in need, as there are many actors providing assistance that do not participate in the cluster system (affected communities, national authorities, Red Cross/Red Crescent movement, and NGOs).

People reached (not shown on this table) comprise those who have received some form of assistance from a cluster member. This figure says nothing about how long and how well this assistance covers the needs of the beneficiary. A more meaningful picture provides the estimate of people covered (pls. see below).

People covered indicates the number of people whose needs, defined by a humanitarian standard such as SPHERE, have been or are being met. Example of difference between “reached” and “covered: 1000 people received water (people reached), vs. 1000 people received enough water to cover their needs (15 litres per person per day) for the next two weeks (people covered).

Narrative Narrative must be brief and focus only on significant changes in needs, objectives, targets, or projects – maximum 800 words. You should highlight: 1) Any significant changes in needs, how the cluster identified them, and why they occurred 2) Important achievements to date in 2012, to substantiate the quantitative information in the table3) Reasons for any significant deviation between targets and actual achievements as of mid-year (e.g. because of poor

funding, low capacity, or spontaneous diminution of needs) 4) Important implementation challenges, including which needs are not covered because of poor funding5) Explanation of changes in targets (if any)6) How the cluster re-validated the projects, for example by mapping the needs and orchestrating the projects so as to

ensure full coverage without gaps or duplications7) Coverage of needs by actors not in the cluster or CAP, and verification that the cluster’s updated project portfolio

does not duplicate these.


Table of mid-year monitoring vs. objectivesOutcomes with corresponding targets Outputs with corresponding

targetsIndicators with corresponding

targets and baselineAchieved as mid-year

Cluster objective 1: lsdflkshdfkdshf






Cluster objective 2: alkjhlkadslkhslkjdhf





Optional: Map of cluster needs and coverage per location [if available]


[Copy the tables, headings etc. from above for the other clusters/sectors. Note: the typical clusters, sectors or other groupings are listed here alphabetically; rearrange, delete, add or modify as needed for your country.]

3.2.2 EARLY RECOVERY

Summary of updated cluster response planCluster lead agency UNITED NATIONS XYZ FUND

Cluster member organizations ASDBDF, ABCDE,

Number of projects 5

Funds required Original: $16,439,509Revised at mid-year:

Funds required per priority level $12,345,677

Funding to date $12,345,677 (ZZ% of requirements)

Contact information Charlie Brown, [email protected]

Categories and disaggregated numbers of affected population and beneficiaries

Category of people in needNumber of people in need Number of targeted beneficiaries Number of people covered

Female Male Total Female Male Total Female Male Total

asdfasdf 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345 12345


Justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum

3.2.3 EDUCATION

Summary of updated cluster response planLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren.

3.2.4 EMERGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Summary of updated cluster response planLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna.

3.2.5 FOOD SECURITY

Summary of updated cluster response plan


Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd.

3.2.6 HEALTH

Summary of updated cluster response planLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat.

3.2.7 LOGISTICS

Summary of updated cluster response planLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata.

3.2.8 NUTRITION

Summary of updated cluster response planLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea.

3.2.9 NUTRITION

Summary of updated cluster response planLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no.


3.2.10 SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS

Summary of updated cluster response planLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren.

3.2.11 WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE

Summary of updated cluster response planLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut

labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea.


4. FORWARD VIEW

[As part of MYR consultations, the HCT must agree on a plan, to be implemented June-August, to fill all key information gaps by the start of 2013 CAP development season in September 2012. They should also specify CAP 2013 workshop dates now, to allow plenty of time for workshop preparation. This table will show the results of these agreements.]

1. Will there be a CAP in 2013? YES/NO

2. CAP 2013 Workshop dates:

3. Needs Assessment Plan for the 2013 CAP: existing assessments, identification of gaps in assessment information, and planned assessments to fill gaps

EXISTING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS

Cluster(s) Geographic areas and population

groups assessed

Organizations that implemented the

assessment

Dates Title or Subject[include hyperlink if

possible]

aaaasdfasdf asdfasdfsad sdfsdfsdfdsf fff sdfsdfsdfdsf

GAPS IN INFORMATION

Ref. # Cluster(s) Geographic areas and population groups Issues of concern

1 ffff fff ffff

2 ff

3

4

5

6

7

PLANNED NEEDS ASSESSMENTS

To fill info gap

(ref. #)

Cluster(s) Geographic areas and population groups targeted

Orgs. to implement

the assessment

Planned dates

Issues of concern

To be funded by[please note amount

of funding gap if necessary funding is not yet committed]

1

2

3

4

5


6

7

ANNEX I: LIST OF PROJECTS AND FUNDING RESULTS TO DATE

TABLE IV. List of appeal projects (grouped by cluster), with funding status of each

TABLE V. Total funding to date per donor to projects listed in the appeal

TABLE VI. Total humanitarian funding to date per donor (appeal plus other)

TABLE VII. Humanitarian funding to date per donor to projects not listed in the appeal

TABLE VIII. Requirements and funding to date per Gender Marker score

TABLE IX. Requirements and funding to date per geographical area [OPTIONAL – SUBSTANTIVE REVIEWER DECIDES CASE-BY-CASE]


ANNEX II: [if needed]


ANNEX III: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

[END OF DOCUMENT TEMPLATE]

ABOUT THE CONSOLIDATED APPEAL PROCESS (CAP)The CAP is a tool for aid organizations to jointly plan, coordinate, implement and monitor their response to disasters and emergencies, and to appeal for funds together instead of competitively.

It is the forum for developing a strategic approach to humanitarian action, focusing on close cooperation among host governments, donors, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) and United Nations organizations. As such, it presents a snapshot of the situation and response plans, and is an inclusive and coordinated programme cycle of:

assessment; strategic and operational planning; resource mobilization; coordinated programme implementation; joint monitoring and evaluation; revision, if necessary; and reporting on results.

The common humanitarian action plan is the core of the CAP – a strategic plan for humanitarian response in a given country or region, including the following elements:

A common analysis of the context in which humanitarian action takes place; An assessment of needs; Best, worst, and most likely scenarios; A clear statement of longer-term objectives and goals; Prioritised response plans, including a detailed mapping of projects to cover all needs; A framework for monitoring the strategy and revising it if necessary.

The CHAP is the core of a consolidated appeal or, when crises break out or natural disasters strike, a flash appeal. Under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator, and in consultation with host Governments and donors, the CHAP is developed at the field level by the Humanitarian Country Team. This team includes IASC members and standing invitees (UN agencies, the International Organization for Migration, the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and NGOs that belong to ICVA, Interaction, or SCHR), but non-IASC members, such as national NGOs, can also be included.

The Humanitarian Coordinator is responsible for the annual preparation of the consolidated appeal document. The document is launched globally near the end of each year to enhance advocacy and resource mobilization. A Mid-Year Review is presented to stakeholders the following July.

Donors generally fund appealing agencies directly in response to project proposals listed in appeals. The Financial Tracking Service (FTS), managed by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), is a database of appeal funding needs and worldwide donor contributions, and can be found on http://fts.unocha.org.

In sum, the CAP is how aid agencies join forces to provide people in need the best available protection and assistance, on time.

http://fts.unocha.org/

OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS(OCHA)

United Nations Palais des Nations

New York, N.Y. 10017 1211 Geneva 10

USA Switzerland

WRITE IN THIS - CLEAN FINAL 2012 CAP document Web viewAPPEAL NAME MID-YEAR REVIEW 2012 17. 8 APPEAL...

Documents

Transcript of WRITE IN THIS - CLEAN FINAL 2012 CAP document Web viewAPPEAL NAME MID-YEAR REVIEW 2012 17. 8 APPEAL...