Wrap Up and Action Planning Kirsti Mijnhijmer 22 April 2009, Copenhagen
World Energy Outlook 2009 - Microsoft · 2019. 11. 27. · World Energy Outlook 2009 Energy Sector...
Transcript of World Energy Outlook 2009 - Microsoft · 2019. 11. 27. · World Energy Outlook 2009 Energy Sector...
© OECD/IEA - 2009
World Energy Outlook 2009Energy Sector Implications Post-Copenhagen
Laura CozziIEA Day, Copenhagen, 16 December 2009
© OECD/IEA - 2009
World primary energy demand in the absence of an agreement in Copenhagen
Non-OECD countries account for 93% of the increase in global demand between 2007 & 2030, driven largely by China & India
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Mto
e China and India
Rest of non-OECD
OECD
© OECD/IEA - 2009
Change in primary energy demand,in the absence of an agreement in Copenhagen, 2007-2030
Fossil fuels account for 77% of the increase in world primary energy demand in 2007-2030, with oil demand rising from 85 mb/d in 2008 to 88 mb/d in 2015 & 105 mb/d in 2030
- 500 0 500 1 000 1 500 2 000
Other renewables
Biomass
Hydro
Nuclear
Gas
Oil
Coal
Mtoe
OECD
Non-OECD
© OECD/IEA - 2009
Average annual expenditure on net imports of oil & gas in the Reference Scenario
The Reference Scenario implies persistently high spending on oil & gas imports, with China overtaking the United States by around 2025 to become the world's biggest spender
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
European
Union
United
States
China Japan India ASEAN
Billion d
ollars
(2008)
1971-2008
2008-2030
1%1%
1%
2%
3%
% Share of GDP
2%
2%
3%
3% 6%
3%
0.4%
© OECD/IEA - 2009
The policy mechanisms in the 450 Scenario
A combination of policy mechanisms, which best reflects nations’ varied circumstances & negotiating positions
We differentiate on the basis of three country groupings> OECD+: OECD & other non-OECD EU countries
> Other Major Economies (OME): Brazil, China, Middle East, Russia & South Africa
> Other Countries (OC): all other countries, including India
A graduated approach> Up to 2020, only OECD+ have national emissions caps
> After 2020, Other Major Economies are also assumed to adopt emissions caps
> Through to 2030, Other Countries continue to focus on national measures
Emissions peaking by 2020 will require> A CO2 price of $50 per tonne for power generation & industry in OECD+
> Investment needs in non-OECD countries of $200 billion in 2020, supported by OECD+ through carbon markets & co-financing
© OECD/IEA - 2009
Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Reference Scenario and 450 Scenario
In the 450 Scenario, greenhouse gas emissions are 35% lower in 2030 compared to the Reference Scenario and 70% lower in 2050.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
RS RS RS 450 RS 450 RS 450 RS 450
2005 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Gt
CO
2-e
q.
F-gases
N2O
CH4
CO2 LULUCF
Other CO2
CO2 energy2
2
2
2
4
© OECD/IEA - 2009
Abatement by policy type in the 450 Scenario relative to the Reference Scenario, 2020
After realising the abatement potential of policies & measures and sectoral approaches, cap-and-trade in OECD+ yields a further 1.8 Gt
30 31 32 33 34 35
Gt
Emissions
450 Scenario
Reference Scenario
Abatement:
OECD+
Other Major Economies
Other Countries
Domestic policies and measures
Sectoral agreements
OECD+ cap-and-trade for
power and industry
(including international credits)
© OECD/IEA - 2009
World abatement of energy-related CO2 emissionsin the 450 Scenario
An additional $10.5 trillion of investment is needed in total in the 450 Scenario, with measures to boost energy efficiency accounting for most of the abatement through to 2030
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
2007 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Gt
450 Scenario
Reference Scenario
OECD+
OME
OC
3.8 Gt
13.8 Gt
CCSNuclear
Renewables
& biofuels
Efficiency
World abatement by technology
2020
3.8 Gt
65%
19%
13%3%
2030
13.8 Gt
57%
23%
10%
10%
© OECD/IEA - 2009
World additional investment in the 450 Scenario relative to the Reference Scenario
$10.5 trillion of additional investment is needed in the 450 Scenario in the period 2010-2030 compared with the Reference Scenario, costing 0.5% of GDP in 2020 & 1.1% of GDP in 2030
0
200
400
600
800
1 000
1 200
2015 2020 2025 2030
Bill
ion
dolla
rs (200
8)
Industry
Power plants
Buildings
Biofuels
Transport
© OECD/IEA - 2009
Incremental world electricity productionin the Reference and 450 Scenarios, 2007-2030
Renewables, nuclear and plants fitted with CCS account for around 60% of electricity generation globally in 2030 in the 450 Scenario, up from less than one-third today
-1 000
0
1 000
2 000
3 000
4 000
5 000
6 000
7 000
Coal Gas Oil Nuclear Hydro Wind Biomass Solar Other
renewables
TWh
Reference Scenario
450 Scenario
© OECD/IEA - 2009
Power generation investment in the 450 Scenario
Low-carbon technologies account for an increasing share of power generation investment –reaching more than 90% in the post 2020 period
0
1 000
2 000
3 000
4 000
5 000
2010-2020 2021-2030
Bill
ion
dolla
rs (200
8)
Fossil fuels
without CCSRenewables
CCS
Nuclear
71%
91%
% Share in total
investment
© OECD/IEA - 2009
World installed coal capacity and retirements/mothballing in the 450 Scenario
By 2030, coal-fired capacity in the 450 Scenario is about half than in the Reference Scenario, as the majority of coal plants built before 2000 becomes uneconomical
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
3 000
3 500
2008 2015 2020 2025 2030
GW
Total retirements/mothballing
Total installedcapacity in 450
lower needs
Plants built before 2000 New coal additions without CCS
Plants built after 2000 New coal additions with CCS
Under construction Additional coal capacity needs in RS
Additional retirements/mothballing Retirements in Reference Scenario
Coal capacity in RS
© OECD/IEA - 2009
World passenger vehicle sales & average new vehicle CO2 intensity in the 450 Scenario
Improvements to the internal combustion engine & the uptake of next-generation vehicles & biofuels lead to a 56% reduction in new-car emission intensity by 2030
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2007 2020 2030
Electric vehicles
Plug-in hybrids
Hybrid vehicles
ICE vehicles
Sha
re o
f sa
les
205
125
90
0
50
100
150
200
250
Gra
mm
es
per
kilo
metr
e
CO2 intensity
of new vehicles
(right axis)
© OECD/IEA - 2009
World primary energy demand by fuel in the 450 Scenario
In the 450 Scenario, demand for fossil fuels peaks by 2020, and by 2030 zero-carbon fuels make up a third of the world's primary sources of energy demand
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Mto
e
0%
6%
12%
18%
24%
30%
36% Fossil fuels
Zero-carbon fuels
Share of zero- carbon fuels
(right axis)
© OECD/IEA - 2009
World oil productionby scenario
Curbing CO2 emissions would also improve energy security by cutting oil demand, but even in the 450 Scenario, OPEC production increases by 11 mb/d between now and 2030
36
mb/d
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2008 Reference Scenario
2030
450 Scenario
2030
mb/d
Non-OPEC
OPEC
11 mb/d
16 mb/d
© OECD/IEA - 2009
Cumulative OPEC oil export revenuesby scenario
Though slightly lower than in the Reference Scenario, OPEC revenues in the 450 Scenario are over four times as high as in the last 20 years
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
1985-2007
Reference Scenario 450 Scenario
2008-2030
Trillion d
ollars
(2008)
© OECD/IEA - 2009
World primary natural gas demand by scenario
Gas demand continues to grow in both scenarios, peaking by around 2025 in the 450 Scenario & highlighting the potential role of gas as a transition fuel to a clean energy future
0
750
1 500
2 250
3 000
3 750
4 500
2007 2015 2020 2025 2030
bcm Reference Scenario
450 Scenario
+41% (1 264 bcm)
+17% (511 bcm)
© OECD/IEA - 2009
Average IEA crude oil import price
The oil price in real terms is assumed to rebound from around $60 per barrel in 2009 with the economic recovery, reaching $100 by 2020 & $115 per barrel by 2030 in Reference Scenario
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Dolla
rs p
er
ba
rrel
Nominal – Reference Scenario
Nominal – 450 Scenario
Real ($2008) – Reference Scenario
Real ($2008) – 450 Scenario
© OECD/IEA - 2009
Additional investment and fuel-cost savings in the 450 Scenario vs. the Reference Scenario
Fuel cost savings in industry, buildings and transport of $8.6 trillion over the period 2010-2030 more than offset the additional investment needed of $8.3 trillion
-12 000
-9 000
-6 000
-3 000
0
3 000
6 000
9 000
12 000
15 000
18 000
Fuel cost savings 2010-2030 Fuel cost savings over lifetime
Billion d
ollars
(2008)
Transport
Buildings
Industry
Incremental investment
2010-2030
© OECD/IEA - 2009
Abatement in the 450 Scenario by key emitters, 2020
China, the United States, the European Union, India, Russia & Japan account for almost three-quarters of the 3.8 Gt reduction in the 450 Scenario
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
China United
States
European
Union
India Russia Japan
Gt
International carbon markets
Cap & trade in power
& industry sectors
International sectoral standards
in transport & industry
National policies
© OECD/IEA - 2009
Additional investment need in non-OECD countries by policy type, 2020
Non-OECD abatement measures co-funded
Abatement (Mt)
Investment ($ billions)
All 450 Scenario abatement
2166 196.9
Sectoral agreements in industry and transport
660 71.8
National policies and measures
907 71.4
Further measures (market mechanisms)
599 53.7
© OECD/IEA - 2009
World abatement of energy-related CO2 emissionsin the 450 Scenario
Current pledges point direction but further efforts would be needed to reach the 450 Scenario
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
2007 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Gt
450 Scenario
Reference Scenario
OECD+
OME
OC
3.8 Gt
13.8 Gt
27
29
31
33
35
2007 2010 2015 2020
Gt
Reference Scenario
450 Scenario
Current
Pledges
© OECD/IEA - 2009
Summary & conclusions
The financial crisis has halted the rise in global fossil-energy use, but its long-term upward path will resume soon on current policies
Tackling climate change & enhancing energy security require a massive decarbonisation of the energy system
> We are now on course for a 6°C temperature rise & rising energy costs
> Limiting temperature rise to 2°C will require big emission reductions in allregions
A 450 path towards ‘Green Growth’ would bring substantial benefits
> Avoiding the worst effects & costs of climate change
> Energy-security benefits, lower oil & gas imports & reduced energy bills
> Much less air pollution & huge health benefits
Natural gas can play a key role as a bridge to a cleaner energy future
The challenge is enormous – but it can and must be met
> Improved energy efficiency & technology deployment are critical
> Each year of delay adds $500 bn to mitigation costs between today & 2030