World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/971911541094372305/...Estonia Region OECD high...
Transcript of World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/971911541094372305/...Estonia Region OECD high...
Economy Profile
Estonia
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 1
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Economy Profile of Estonia
Doing Business 2019 Indicators(in order of appearance in the document)
Starting a business Procedures, time, cost and paid-in minimum capital to start a limited liability company
Dealing with construction permits Procedures, time and cost to complete all formalities to build a warehouse and the qualitycontrol and safety mechanisms in the construction permitting system
Getting electricity Procedures, time and cost to get connected to the electrical grid, and the reliability of theelectricity supply and the transparency of tariffs
Registering property Procedures, time and cost to transfer a property and the quality of the land administrationsystem
Getting credit Movable collateral laws and credit information systems
Protecting minority investors Minority shareholders’ rights in related-party transactions and in corporate governance
Paying taxes Payments, time, total tax and contribution rate for a firm to comply with all tax regulations aswell as post-filing processes
Trading across borders Time and cost to export the product of comparative advantage and import auto parts
Enforcing contracts Time and cost to resolve a commercial dispute and the quality of judicial processes
Resolving insolvency Time, cost, outcome and recovery rate for a commercial insolvency and the strength of thelegal framework for insolvency
Labor market regulation Flexibility in employment regulation and aspects of job quality
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 2
About Doing Business
The project provides objective measures of business regulations and their enforcement across 190 economies and selectedcities at the subnational and regional level.
Doing Business
The project, launched in 2002, looks at domestic small and medium-size companies and measures the regulations applyingto them through their life cycle.
Doing Business
captures several important dimensions of the regulatory environment as it applies to local firms. It provides quantitativeindicators on regulation for starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit,protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. alsomeasures features of labor market regulation. Although does not present rankings of economies on the labor marketregulation indicators or include the topic in the aggregate ease of doing business score or ranking on the ease of doing business, it doespresent the data for these indicators.
Doing Business
Doing BusinessDoing Business
By gathering and analyzing comprehensive quantitative data to compare business regulation environments across economies and over time,encourages economies to compete towards more efficient regulation; offers measurable benchmarks for reform; and serves
as a resource for academics, journalists, private sector researchers and others interested in the business climate of each economy.Doing Business
In addition, offers detailed , which exhaustively cover business regulation and reform in different cities andregions within a nation. These reports provide data on the ease of doing business, rank each location, and recommend reforms to improveperformance in each of the indicator areas. Selected cities can compare their business regulations with other cities in the economy or regionand with the 190 economies that has ranked.
Doing Business subnational reports
Doing Business
The first report, published in 2003, covered 5 indicator sets and 133 economies. This year’s report covers 11 indicator setsand 190 economies. Most indicator sets refer to a case scenario in the largest business city of each economy, except for 11 economies thathave a population of more than 100 million as of 2013 (Bangladesh, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, theRussian Federation and the United States) where also collected data for the second largest business city. The data for these11 economies are a population-weighted average for the 2 largest business cities. The project has benefited from feedback fromgovernments, academics, practitioners and reviewers. The initial goal remains: to provide an objective basis for understanding and improvingthe regulatory environment for business around the world.
Doing Business
Doing Business
More about (PDF, 5MB)Doing Business
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 3
Ease of Doing Business in
EstoniaRegion OECD high income
Income Category High income
Population 1,315,480
City Covered Tallinn
DB 2019 Rank190 1
16
DB 2019 Ease of doing business score0 100
80.50
DB 2019 Ease of Doing Business Score
0 10084.64: Denmark (Rank: 3)
80.83: Lithuania (Rank: 14)
80.50: Estonia (Rank: 16)
80.35: Finland (Rank: 17)
79.59: Latvia (Rank: 19)
77.80: Regional Average (OECD high income)
Note: The ease of doing business score captures the gap of each economy from the best regulatory performance observed on each of the indicators across all economiesin the sample since 2005. An economy’s ease of doing business score is reflected on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the lowest and 100represents the best performance. The ease of doing business ranking ranges from 1 to 190.
Doing Business
Rankings on Doing Business topics - Estonia
Startinga
Business
Dealingwith
ConstructionPermits
GettingElectricity
RegisteringProperty
GettingCredit
ProtectingMinorityInvestors
PayingTaxes
Tradingacross
Borders
EnforcingContracts
ResolvingInsolvency
1
28
55
82
109
136
163
190
Rank
15 14
46
6
44
83
14 17 13
47
Ease of Doing Business Score on Doing Business topics - Estonia
Startinga
Business
Dealingwith
ConstructionPermits
GettingElectricity
RegisteringProperty
GettingCredit
ProtectingMinorityInvestors
PayingTaxes
Tradingacross
Borders
EnforcingContracts
ResolvingInsolvency
0
20
40
60
80
100
Scor
e
95.25
82.53 83.2691.02
70.00
56.67
89.56
99.92
74.34
62.51
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 4
Starting a Business
This topic measures the number of procedures, time, cost and paid-in minimum capital requirement for a small- to medium-sized limitedliability company to start up and formally operate in each economy’s largest business city.
To make the data comparable across 190 economies, uses a standardized business that is 100% domestically owned, hasstart-up capital equivalent to 10 times the income per capita, engages in general industrial or commercial activities and employs between 10and 50 people one month after the commencement of operations, all of whom are domestic nationals. Starting a Business considers twotypes of local limited liability companies that are identical in all aspects, except that one company is owned by 5 married women and theother by 5 married men. The ranking of economies on the ease of starting a business is determined by sorting their scores for starting abusiness. These scores are the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators.
Doing Business
The most recent round of data collection for the project was completed in May 2018. .See the methodology for more information
What the indicators measure
Procedures to legally start and formally operatea company (number)
Preregistration (for example, name verification orreservation, notarization)
•
Registration in the economy’s largest businesscity
•
Postregistration (for example, social securityregistration, company seal)
•
Obtaining approval from spouse to start abusiness or to leave the home to register thecompany
•
Obtaining any gender specific document forcompany registration and operation or nationalidentification card
•
Time required to complete each procedure(calendar days)
Does not include time spent gatheringinformation
•
Each procedure starts on a separate day (2procedures cannot start on the same day)
•
Procedures fully completed online are recordedas ½ day
•
Procedure is considered completed once finaldocument is received
•
No prior contact with officials•Cost required to complete each procedure (% ofincome per capita)
Official costs only, no bribes•No professional fees unless services required bylaw or commonly used in practice
•
Paid-in minimum capital (% of income percapita)
• Funds deposited in a bank or with third partybefore registration or up to 3 months afterincorporation
Case study assumptions
To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions about thebusiness and the procedures are used. It is assumed that any required information isreadily available and that the entrepreneur will pay no bribes.
The business:
- Is a limited liability company (or its legal equivalent). If there is more than one typeof limited liability company in the economy, the most common among domestic firmsis chosen. Information on the most common form is obtained from incorporationlawyers or the statistical office.- Operates in the economy’s largest business city. For 11 economies the data arealso collected for the second largest business city.- The entire office space is approximately 929 square meters (10,000 square feet).- Is 100% domestically owned and has five owners, none of whom is a legal entity;has a start-up capital of 10 times income per capita and has a turnover of at least100 times income per capita.- Performs general industrial or commercial activities, such as the production or saleof goods or services to the public. The business does not perform foreign tradeactivities and does not handle products subject to a special tax regime, for example,liquor or tobacco. It does not use heavily polluting production processes.- Leases the commercial plant or offices and is not a proprietor of real estate and theamount of the annual lease for the office space is equivalent to the income percapita.- Does not qualify for investment incentives or any special benefits.- Has at least 10 and up to 50 employees one month after the commencement ofoperations, all of whom are domestic nationals.- Has a company deed that is 10 pages long.
The owners:
- Have reached the legal age of majority. If there is no legal age of majority, they areassumed to be 30 years old.- Are sane, competent, in good health and have no criminal record.- Are married and the marriage is monogamous and registered with the authorities.- Where the answer differs according to the legal system applicable to the woman orman in question (as may be the case in economies where there is legal plurality), theanswer used will be the one that applies to the majority of the population.
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 5
Starting a Business - Estonia
Figure – Starting a Business in Estonia and comparator economies – Ranking and Score
DB 2019 Starting a Business Score
0 100
95.25: Estonia (Rank: 15)
94.13: Latvia (Rank: 24)
93.18: Lithuania (Rank: 31)
92.52: Denmark (Rank: 42)
92.43: Finland (Rank: 43)
91.19: Regional Average (OECD high income)
Note: The ranking of economies on the ease of starting a business is determined by sorting their scores for starting a business. These scoresare the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators.
Standardized Company
Legal form Private Limited Company (osaühing or OÜ)
Paid-in minimum capital requirement EUR 2,500
City Covered Tallinn
Indicator Estonia OECD highincome
Best RegulatoryPerformance
Procedure – Men (number) 3 4.9 1 (New Zealand)
Time – Men (days) 3.5 9.3 0.5 (New Zealand)
Cost – Men (% of income per capita) 1.1 3.1 0.0 (Slovenia)
Procedure – Women (number) 3 4.9 1 (New Zealand)
Time – Women (days) 3.5 9.3 0.5 (New Zealand)
Cost – Women (% of income per capita) 1.1 3.1 0.0 (Slovenia)
Paid-in min. capital (% of income per capita) 14.6 8.6 0.0 (117 Economies)
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 6
Figure – Starting a Business in Estonia – Procedure, Time and Cost
This symbol is shown beside procedure numbers that take place simultaneously with the previous procedure.*
Note: Online procedures account for 0.5 days in the total time calculation. For economies that have a different procedure list for men andwomen, the graph shows the time for women. For more information on methodology, see the website( ). For details on the procedures reflected here, see the summary below.
Doing Businesshttp://doingbusiness.org/en/methodology
Procedures (number)1 2 * 3
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5Ti
me
(day
s)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Cost
(% o
f inc
ome
per c
apita
)
Time (days) Cost (% of income per capita)
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 7
Details – Starting a Business in Estonia – Procedure, Time and Cost
Takes place simultaneously with previous procedure.
No. Procedures Time to Complete Associated Costs
1 Check company name, submit the registration application to theCommercial Register and deposit initial capital
: Commercial RegistryAgencyThe entrepreneur can check proposed names online at www.rik.ee. The law provides thatthe company business name shall be clearly distinguishable. It is also possible forentrepreneurs to deposit the initial capital in a bank via online banking as part ofcompany registration process at the Commercial Register.
The costs of registration into the Commercial Register are EUR 145 for regularregistration or EUR 190 for expedited registration.A separate registration with the National Social Insurance Board, which gets itsinformation from the Estonian Tax and Customs Board, is not required. Health insurancein Estonia is through a compulsory scheme under which employers are obliged by law topay social tax (the source revenue for health insurance) for their employees. The rate ofsocial tax is 33% of the taxable amount. This tax must be paid by the tenth day of themonth following the taxable period, and the corresponding tax return must be submittedto the local Tax and Customs Board office of the residence or seat of the payers of socialtax by the same date.
If the share capital is higher than EUR 25,000 the entrepreneur needs to deposit it in abank. However, if the decided share capital is not over EUR 25,000, it can be establishedat the memorandum of association that the shareholders are not obliged to make pre-payments for the shares.
In that case a shareholder does not make a payment for the share, it will be personallyliable to the company in the amount of his/her unpaid share contribution. In the last year,more than 70% of the companies were founded without making pre-payments.
In order to be able to use a start-up bank account (opened for paying in the initial sharecapital) for the company's day-to-day activities the management board member(s) of thecompany (after the incorporation process has been completed) has/have to personallyapply (at the commercial bank) for transformation of the start-up bank account of thecompany into a regular current account.
Less than one day(online procedure)
EUR 145 regularregistration or EUR190 expeditedregistration
2 Register for VAT at the Estonian National Tax Board: Estonian National Tax and Customs BoardAgency
The company must register itself as VAT payer if the taxable turnover of the company,excluding imports of goods, exceeds EUR 40,000, as calculated from the beginning of thecalendar year. The VAT Act is available athttps://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/527022014003/consolide/current
The company’s management board must file an application for company registration,making the company liable for VAT with the Tax and Customs Board, within 3 days as ofthe date on which the taxable turnover of the company. The tax authority shall register aperson as a taxable person by entering the data concerning the person in the register oftaxable persons as on the date on which the registration obligation arose, within fiveworking days as of the receipt of the application. Registration may be (and in thepractice, often is) affected immediately after establishment.
According to subsection 20(1) of the Value-Added Tax Act, an application forregistration may be submitted through the information system of the commercial registerin a digitally signed format or applied to a notary for the preparation of an application andsubmitted thereof through the information system of the e-notary.
3 days no charge
3 Register employees with the Employment Register: Estonian Tax and Customs BoardAgency
On 1 July 2014 the amended Taxation Act establishing the employment register, whereall the natural and legal persons that work are required to register the persons employedby them with the Estonian Tax and Customs Board, entered into force. Since that momentthe employers are not required to submit the data on the employed persons to theEstonian Health Insurance Fund.Commencement of the employment must be recorded latest by the moment when anemployee commnces the work. When terminating or suspending the employment,employers have ten days to record the termination or suspension as of the day ofsuspension or termination of the employment.
Less than one day(online procedure,simultaneous withprevious procedure)
no charge
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 8
Dealing with Construction Permits
This topic tracks the procedures, time and cost to build a warehouse—including obtaining necessary the licenses and permits, submitting allrequired notifications, requesting and receiving all necessary inspections and obtaining utility connections. In addition, the Dealing withConstruction Permits indicator measures the building quality control index, evaluating the quality of building regulations, the strength ofquality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes, and professional certification requirements. The most recent round ofdata collection was completed in May 2018. See the methodology for more information
What the indicators measure
Procedures to legally build a warehouse(number)
Submitting all relevant documents and obtainingall necessary clearances, licenses, permits andcertificates
•
Submitting all required notifications and receivingall necessary inspections
•
Obtaining utility connections for water andsewerage
•
Registering and selling the warehouse after itscompletion
•
Time required to complete each procedure(calendar days)
Does not include time spent gatheringinformation
•
Each procedure starts on a separate day—though procedures that can be fully completedonline are an exception to this rule
•
Procedure is considered completed once finaldocument is received
•
No prior contact with officials•Cost required to complete each procedure (% ofincome per capita)
Official costs only, no bribes•Building quality control index (0-15)
Quality of building regulations (0-2)•Quality control before construction (0-1)•Quality control during construction (0-3)•Quality control after construction (0-3)•Liability and insurance regimes (0-2)•Professional certifications (0-4)•
Case study assumptions
To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions about theconstruction company, the warehouse project and the utility connections are used.
The construction company (BuildCo):
- Is a limited liability company (or its legal equivalent) and operates in the economy’slargest business city. For 11 economies the data are also collected for the secondlargest business city.- Is 100% domestically and privately owned; has five owners, none of whom is alegal entity. Has a licensed architect and a licensed engineer, both registered withthe local association of architects or engineers. BuildCo is not assumed to have anyother employees who are technical or licensed experts, such as geological ortopographical experts.- Owns the land on which the warehouse will be built and will sell the warehouseupon its completion.
The warehouse:
- Will be used for general storage activities, such as storage of books or stationery.- Will have two stories, both above ground, with a total constructed area ofapproximately 1,300.6 square meters (14,000 square feet). Each floor will be 3meters (9 feet, 10 inches) high and will be located on a land plot of approximately929 square meters (10,000 square feet) that is 100% owned by BuildCo, and thewarehouse is valued at 50 times income per capita.- Will have complete architectural and technical plans prepared by a licensedarchitect. If preparation of the plans requires such steps as obtaining furtherdocumentation or getting prior approvals from external agencies, these are countedas procedures.- Will take 30 weeks to construct (excluding all delays due to administrative andregulatory requirements).
The water and sewerage connections:
- Will be 150 meters (492 feet) from the existing water source and sewer tap. If thereis no water delivery infrastructure in the economy, a borehole will be dug. If there isno sewerage infrastructure, a septic tank in the smallest size available will beinstalled or built.- Will have an average water use of 662 liters (175 gallons) a day and an averagewastewater flow of 568 liters (150 gallons) a day. Will have a peak water use of1,325 liters (350 gallons) a day and a peak wastewater flow of 1,136 liters (300gallons) a day.- Will have a constant level of water demand and wastewater flow throughout theyear; will be 1 inch in diameter for the water connection and 4 inches in diameter forthe sewerage connection.
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 9
Dealing with Construction Permits - Estonia
Figure – Dealing with Construction Permits in Estonia and comparator economies – Ranking and Score
DB 2019 Dealing with Construction Permits Score
0 100
86.94: Denmark (Rank: 4)
84.86: Lithuania (Rank: 7)
82.53: Estonia (Rank: 14)
75.79: Finland (Rank: 34)
75.41: Regional Average (OECD high income)
73.46: Latvia (Rank: 56)
Note: The ranking of economies on the ease of dealing with construction permits is determined by sorting their scores for dealing withconstruction permits. These scores are the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators.
Figure – Dealing with Construction Permits in Estonia – Procedure, Time and Cost
This symbol is shown beside procedure numbers that take place simultaneously with the previous procedure.*
Note: Online procedures account for 0.5 days in the total time calculation. For economies that have a different procedure list for men andwomen, the graph shows the time for women. For more information on methodology, see the website( ). For details on the procedures reflected here, see the summary below.
Doing Businesshttp://doingbusiness.org/en/methodology
Procedures (number)1 * 2 * 3 * 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
20
40
60
80
100
Tim
e (d
ays)
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
Cost
(% o
f war
ehou
se v
alue
)
Time (days) Cost (% of warehouse value)
Standardized Warehouse
Estimated value of warehouse EUR 856,807.90
City Covered Tallinn
Indicator Estonia OECD highincome
Best RegulatoryPerformance
Procedures (number) 10 12.7 None in 2017/18
Time (days) 103 153.1 None in 2017/18
Cost (% of warehouse value) 0.2 1.5 None in 2017/18
Building quality control index (0-15) 11.0 11.5 15.0 (3 Economies)
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 10
Figure – Dealing with Construction Permits in Estonia and comparator economies – Measure of Quality
Estonia Denmark Finland Latvia Lithuania OECD high income
0
5
10
15
Inde
x sc
ore
11.0 11.010.0
12.013.0
11.5
Details – Dealing with Construction Permits in Estonia – Procedure, Time and Cost
No. Procedures Time to Complete Associated Costs
1 Obtain project clearance from Fire Department: Fire DepartmentAgency
According to the Rescue Act of 2010, obtaining fire safety clearance for the buildingproject from the National Rescue Service Agency or a local government rescue serviceshould take 10 days. However in practice it takes 30 days. If the building project does notconform to the fire safety rules, the Rescue Service can decide to give on average fiveworkdays to eliminate deficiencies.
30 days no charge
2 Obtain project clearance from Environment Department: Environment DepartmentAgency
The Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System Actentered into effect on April 3, 2005, providing legal bases and procedures for assessinglikely environmental impact, organization of eco-management and audit schemes, and thelegal bases for awarding eco-labels to prevent environmental damage.
The environmental impact shall be assessed upon application for, or application foramendment of, a development consent (a building permit or a permit for the buildinguse), if the proposed activity, which is the basis for the application for, or the amendmentof, the development consent, potentially results in significant environmental impact. Aperson who proposes an activity and intends to carry it out shall organize anenvironmental impact assessment and carry all the resulting expenses.
It is up to the local municipality to decide whether it is at all necessary to assess theenvironmental impact of the project. There are two types of grounds for requiring anenvironmental impact assessment to be carried out. First of all there are instances inwhich it is obligatory to conduct environmental impact assessment. The hypotheticalwarehouse project should not qualify under this category. The second category is suchthat the local municipality is required to consider whether an environmental impactassessment is needed or not and if the local municipality decides that it is necessary, itmust give reasons for such a decision. The hypothetical warehouse project might qualifyunder this category if for example considered to be (a part of) an industrial areadevelopment. Besides the fact that it is in hands of municipality to make a decision, thereare no clear definitions on what does not exactly fall into category of projects that do notqualify for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). It is likely BuildCo would need toobtain a clearance but not the full scale EIA approval.
The Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System Actestablished a term of 30 days for issuing a decision to approve the environmental impactassessment report. The time may vary from 30 days to 1 year for actual EIA approvalboth from Municipality and Environmental Supervisory Authority. It would also includea period of public hearing. However, since we are just getting a project clearance for arelatively simple project, the procedure should be completed within 30 days.
29 days no charge
3 Obtain project clearance from Health Care Department: Health Care DepartmentAgency
A clearance for the building project from the Health Care Department is not required.However, this authority may be consulted by the local government before granting orrefusing the building permit. In practice, the local government may ask the applicant topersonally communicate with these authorities. There is no time limits for suchcommunication. Further, the Health Care Department has the right to perform statesupervision over compliance with occupational health requirements when the warehouseis put into use.
28 days no charge
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 11
4 Obtain project clearance from Labor Inspections Department: Labor Inspections DepartmentAgency
A clearance for the building project from the Labor Inspections Department is notrequired by law in the stage prior to approval of the building permit. However, thisauthority may be consulted by the local government before granting or refusing thebuilding permit. In practice, the local government may ask the applicant to personallycommunicate with these authorities. The Labor Inspectorate has the right to perform statesupervision over compliance with occupational safety requirements during constructionand when the warehouse is put into use. According to Occupational Health and SafetyAct, Paragraph 13, the employer is obliged to notify the local department of the LaborInspectorate in writing or in a format which can be reproduced in writing beforecommencing activities. The notification can also be made also via the Customer Portal ofthe Labor Inspectorate (https://eti.ti.ee/login/index?redir=true).
Paragraph 26 provides that after receiving the notification, an inspector has the obligationto carry out an inspection. The employee of the Labor Inspectorate must set up the timeof inspection with the owner of the building, but in extraordinary situations, the inspectorhas the right to commence supervision without informing the employer in advance.
27 days no charge
5 Obtain building permit: MunicipalityAgency
To obtain a building permit from the Municipality, BuildCo must submit an applicationfor a construction permit and construction design documentation. According to theBuilding Act, the local government must approve or refuse the issuance of a buildingpermit within 20 days from the date on which the application for the building permit andthe building design documentation are submitted. The Municipality conducts internalconsultations with various departments and agencies. However in practice, BuildCo islikely to follow up with these authorities.
Since June 2009, an energy certificate for the new building must be included in theapplication. The energy audit is assumed to be conducted by the engineers of the newlybuilt warehouse.
Prior to construction, BuildCo must notify the Municipality that construction will begin.
25 days EUR 585
6 Receive on-site inspection by Municipality: MunicipalityAgency
During construction, the Municipality may monitor the work to verify compliance withthe requirements. If the construction does not comply with the applicable rules andregulations, the construction will be stopped.
1 day no charge
7 Receive on-site inspection by Estonian Technical Surveillance Authority: Technical Surveillance AuthorityAgency
According to the amendment of Building Act from January 1, 2008 Estonian TechnicalSurveillance Authority may carry out state surveillance on construction sites, in additionto the surveillance exercised by the Municipality. Before the building is being used or incase of an emergency in a building that is already in use, the Estonian TechnicalSurveillance Authority does not have to inform the owner about the inspectionbeforehand. In other situations, the owner must be notified at least 24 hours in advance.
The number of inspections is not limited by law -- it is up to the discretion of theTechnical Surveillance Authority. However it should comply with the principles of goodadministration practices. The costs of the evaluation services, of the expert assessment ofbuilding design documentation and of the evaluation of construction works ordered toverify conformity to the requirements are borne by the Technical Surveillance Authority.If it is established that the construction works or building design documentation do notconform to the established requirements, the owner of the construction works has tocompensate the Technical Surveillance Authority for the costs of the evaluation servicesordered to verify conformity to the requirements, including the costs of expert assessmentor evaluation.
1 day no charge
8 Apply for permit of use and request final inspection from Municipality: MunicipalityAgency
The local municipality has discretion as to which agencies can be engaged in theinspection before the permit to use the building is issued. According to the law, the localmunicipality must issue a permit to use the building (or issue a refusal to not use thebuilding) within 30 days from the date on which the last document necessary for the issueof the permit is submitted. BuildCo would have the right to file an action to theadministrative court in case the 30-day limit is not respected. In practice though fewcompanies file lawsuits against the authorities.
1 day EUR 64
9 Receive final inspection from Municipality and obtain permit of use: MunicipalityAgency
The date and the time of the final inspection is agreed between the builder and themunicipal authority. The permit for use is not issued before the final inspection is carriedout.
25 days no charge
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 12
Takes place simultaneously with previous procedure.
10 Obtain water and sewerage connection: AS Tallina VesiAgency
20 days EUR 1,131
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 13
Details – Dealing with Construction Permits in Estonia – Measure of Quality
Answer Score
Building quality control index (0-15) 11.0
Quality of building regulations index (0-2) 2.0
How accessible are building laws and regulations in your economy? (0-1) Available online;Free of charge.
1.0
Which requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified in the buildingregulations or on any accessible website, brochure or pamphlet? (0-1)
List of requireddocuments; Feesto be paid;Requiredpreapprovals.
1.0
Quality control before construction index (0-1) 1.0
Which third-party entities are required by law to verify that the building plans are incompliance with existing building regulations? (0-1)
Licensedengineer.
1.0
Quality control during construction index (0-3) 3.0
What types of inspections (if any) are required by law to be carried out during construction?(0-2)
Inspections by in-house engineer;Unscheduledinspections; Risk-basedinspections.
2.0
Do legally mandated inspections occur in practice during construction? (0-1) Mandatoryinspections arealways done inpractice.
1.0
Quality control after construction index (0-3) 3.0
Is there a final inspection required by law to verify that the building was built in accordancewith the approved plans and regulations? (0-2)
Yes, finalinspection isdone bygovernmentagency.
2.0
Do legally mandated final inspections occur in practice? (0-1) Final inspectionalways occurs inpractice.
1.0
Liability and insurance regimes index (0-2) 1.0
Which parties (if any) are held liable by law for structural flaws or problems in the buildingonce it is in use (Latent Defect Liability or Decennial Liability)? (0-1)
Architect orengineer;Professional incharge of thesupervision;Constructioncompany.
1.0
Which parties (if any) are required by law to obtain an insurance policy to cover possiblestructural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use (Latent Defect Liability Insuranceor Decennial Insurance)? (0-1)
No party isrequired by lawto obtaininsurance .
0.0
Professional certifications index (0-4) 1.0
What are the qualification requirements for the professional responsible for verifying that thearchitectural plans or drawings are in compliance with existing building regulations? (0-2)
University degreein architecture orengineering.
0.0
What are the qualification requirements for the professional who supervises the constructionon the ground? (0-2)
Minimum numberof years ofexperience;University degreein engineering,construction orconstructionmanagement.
1.0
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 14
Getting Electricity
This topic measures the procedures, time and cost required for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection for a newlyconstructed warehouse. Additionally, the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index measures reliability of supply, transparency oftariffs and the price of electricity. The most recent round of data collection for the project was completed in May 2018.
.See the methodology
for more information
What the indicators measure
Procedures to obtain an electricity connection(number)
Submitting all relevant documents and obtainingall necessary clearances and permits
•
Completing all required notifications andreceiving all necessary inspections
•
Obtaining external installation works and possiblypurchasing material for these works
•
Concluding any necessary supply contract andobtaining final supply
•
Time required to complete each procedure(calendar days)
Is at least 1 calendar day•Each procedure starts on a separate day•Does not include time spent gatheringinformation
•
Reflects the time spent in practice, with littlefollow-up and no prior contact with officials
•
Cost required to complete each procedure (% ofincome per capita)
Official costs only, no bribes•Value added tax excluded•
The reliability of supply and transparency oftariffs index (0-8)
Duration and frequency of power outages (0–3)•Tools to monitor power outages (0–1)•Tools to restore power supply (0–1)•Regulatory monitoring of utilities’ performance(0–1)
•
Financial deterrents limiting outages (0–1)•Transparency and accessibility of tariffs (0–1)•
Price of electricity (cents per kilowatt-hour)*
Price based on monthly bill for commercialwarehouse in case study
•
*Note: measures the price ofelectricity, but it is not included in the ease of doingbusiness score nor the ranking on the ease ofgetting electricity.
Doing Business
Case study assumptions
To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions about thewarehouse, the electricity connection and the monthly consumption are used.
The warehouse:
- Is owned by a local entrepreneur and is used for storage of goods.- Is located in the economy’s largest business city. For 11 economies the data arealso collected for the second largest business city.- Is located in an area where similar warehouses are typically located and is in anarea with no physical constraints. For example, the property is not near a railway.- Is a new construction and is being connected to electricity for the first time.- Has two stories with a total surface area of approximately 1,300.6 square meters(14,000 square feet). The plot of land on which it is built is 929 square meters(10,000 square feet).
The electricity connection:
- Is a permanent one with a three-phase, four-wire Y connection with a subscribedcapacity of 140-kilo-volt-ampere (kVA) with a power factor of 1, when 1 kVA = 1kilowatt (kW).- Has a length of 150 meters. The connection is to either the low- or medium-voltagedistribution network and is either overhead or underground, whichever is morecommon in the area where the warehouse is located and requires works that involvethe crossing of a 10-meter road (such as by excavation or overhead lines) but are allcarried out on public land. There is no crossing of other owners’ private propertybecause the warehouse has access to a road.- Does not require work to install the internal wiring of the warehouse. This hasalready been completed up to and including the customer’s service panel orswitchboard and the meter base.
The monthly consumption:
- It is assumed that the warehouse operates 30 days a month from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00p.m. (8 hours a day), with equipment utilized at 80% of capacity on average and thatthere are no electricity cuts (assumed for simplicity reasons) and the monthly energyconsumption is 26,880 kilowatt-hours (kWh); hourly consumption is 112 kWh.- If multiple electricity suppliers exist, the warehouse is served by the cheapestsupplier.- Tariffs effective in January of the current year are used for calculation of the price ofelectricity for the warehouse. Although January has 31 days, for calculationpurposes only 30 days are used.
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 15
Getting Electricity - Estonia
Figure – Getting Electricity in Estonia and comparator economies – Ranking and Score
DB 2019 Getting Electricity Score
0 100
90.22: Denmark (Rank: 21)
88.98: Finland (Rank: 25)
88.43: Lithuania (Rank: 26)
85.47: Regional Average (OECD high income)
83.26: Estonia (Rank: 46)
82.24: Latvia (Rank: 53)
Note: The ranking of economies on the ease of getting electricity is determined by sorting their scores for getting electricity. These scores arethe simple average of the scores for all the component indicators except the price of electricity.
Standardized Connection
Price of electricity (US cents per kWh) 8.5
Name of utility Elektrilevi OÜ
City Covered Tallinn
Indicator Estonia OECD highincome
Best RegulatoryPerformance
Procedures (number) 5 4.5 3 (25 Economies)
Time (days) 91 77.2 18 (3 Economies)
Cost (% of income per capita) 154.2 64.2 0.0 (3 Economies)
Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) 8 7.5 8.0 (27 Economies)
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 16
Figure – Getting Electricity in Estonia – Procedure, Time and Cost
This symbol is shown beside procedure numbers that take place simultaneously with the previous procedure.*
Note: Online procedures account for 0.5 days in the total time calculation. For economies that have a different procedure list for men andwomen, the graph shows the time for women. For more information on methodology, see the website( ). For details on the procedures reflected here, see the summary below.
Doing Businesshttp://doingbusiness.org/en/methodology
Procedures (number)1 2 * 3 4 5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90Ti
me
(day
s)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Cost
(% o
f inc
ome
per c
apita
)
Time (days) Cost (% of income per capita)
Figure – Getting Electricity in Estonia and comparator economies – Measure of Quality
Estonia Denmark Finland Latvia Lithuania OECD high income
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Inde
x sc
ore
87
87
87.5
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 17
Details – Getting Electricity in Estonia – Procedure, Time and Cost
Takes place simultaneously with previous procedure.
No. Procedures Time to Complete Associated Costs
1 Submit application to Elektrilevi OÜ and await estimate and technicalconditions
: Elektrilevi OÜAgencyAfter determining the fuse size and the location of the subscription shield the customersubmits an application for a connection.
The application can be submitted in person, by e-mail and through e-services on theutility's website. After submitting the application, a technical solution based on the datain the application and a contract offer are presented to the customer by Elektrilevi OÜ. .There is an external inspection during this time period by Elektrilevi OÜ but no one fromthe applicant’s party is required to be present during the inspection.
12 calendar days EUR 0
2 Pay estimate and await completion of external works by Elektrilevi OÜ: Elektrilevi OÜAgency
Once the estimate is received the connection agreement together with the supply contractcan be concluded at the customer service centre. After the conclusion of the contract, aninvoice for making the first installment payment is sent.Once the fee is received, the necessary works for the connection are carried out byElektrilevi OÜ.The customer is notified of the completion of the external works and is presented with thesecond installment for the connection fees which must be paid within 14 days.
75 calendar days EUR 20,852.45
3 Receive internal wiring inspection by independent inspector: Internal wiring inspectorAgency
According to the Electrical Safety Act, an independent electrical inspector with a specialpermit for internal wiring inspections, must conduct an inspection of the internal wiringto check for compliance with the law. If the internal wiring is in compliance andconforms to the requirements, the independent electrical inspection issues a notice on theconformity, whichis submitted to the customer service centre or sent by post to ElektrileviOÜ
3 calendar days EUR 350
4 Sign supply contract with electricity retailer: Electricity retailerAgency
When the connection fee is paid, the customer can conclude a network and electricitysupply contract. Supply contract can be concluded with any supplier of electricityoperating in Estonia's competitive market.
2 calendar days EUR 0
5 Await final connection from Elektrilevi OÜ: Elektrilevi OÜAgency
Once the supply and the connection contracts are signed and the internal wiring tests arecompleted, the building will be connected to the power supply network.
2 calendar days EUR 5,213.11
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 18
Details – Getting Electricity in Estonia – Measure of Quality
Note:
If the duration and frequency of outages is 100 or less, the economy is eligible to score on the Reliability of supply and transparency of tariffindex.
If the duration and frequency of outages is not available, or is over 100, the economy is not eligible to score on the index.
If the minimum outage time considered for SAIDI/SAIFI is over 5 minutes, the economy is not eligible to score on the index.
Answer
Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) 8
Total duration and frequency of outages per customer a year (0-3) 3
System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) 0.3
System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) 0.3
What is the minimum outage time (in minutes) that the utility considers for the calculation of SAIDI/SAIFI 3.0
Mechanisms for monitoring outages (0-1) 1
Does the distribution utility use automated tools to monitor outages? Yes
Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) 1
Does the distribution utility use automated tools to restore service? Yes
Regulatory monitoring (0-1) 1
Does a regulator—that is, an entity separate from the utility—monitor the utility’s performance on reliability ofsupply?
Yes
Financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages (0-1) 1
Does the utility either pay compensation to customers or face fines by the regulator (or both) if outagesexceed a certain cap?
Yes
Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) 1
Are effective tariffs available online? Yes
Link to the website, if available online https://www.elektrilevi.ee/ru/hinnakiri
Are customers notified of a change in tariff ahead of the billing cycle? Yes
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 19
Registering Property
This topic examines the steps, time and cost involved in registering property, assuming a standardized case of an entrepreneur who wants topurchase land and a building that is already registered and free of title dispute. In addition, the topic also measures the quality of the landadministration system in each economy. The quality of land administration index has five dimensions: reliability of infrastructure, transparencyof information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution, and equal access to property rights. The most recent round of data collection forthe project was completed in May 2018. .See the methodology for more information
What the indicators measure
Procedures to legally transfer title onimmovable property (number)
Preregistration procedures (for example,checking for liens, notarizing sales agreement,paying property transfer taxes)
•
Registration procedures in the economy's largestbusiness city.
•
Postregistration procedures (for example, fillingtitle with municipality)
•
Time required to complete each procedure(calendar days)
Does not include time spent gatheringinformation
•
Each procedure starts on a separate day -though procedures that can be fully completedonline are an exception to this rule
•
Procedure is considered completed once finaldocument is received
•
No prior contact with officials•Cost required to complete each procedure (% ofproperty value)
Official costs only (such as administrative fees,duties and taxes).
•
Value Added Tax, Capital Gains Tax and illicitpayments are excluded
•
Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8)•Transparency of information index (0–6)•Geographic coverage index (0–8)•Land dispute resolution index (0–8)•Equal access to property rights index (-2–0)•
Case study assumptions
To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions about theparties to the transaction, the property and the procedures are used.
The parties (buyer and seller):
- Are limited liability companies (or the legal equivalent).- Are located in the periurban area of the economy’s largest business city. For 11economies the data are also collected for the second largest business city.- Are 100% domestically and privately owned.- Have 50 employees each, all of whom are nationals.- Perform general commercial activities.
The property (fully owned by the seller):
- Has a value of 50 times income per capita, which equals the sale price.- Is fully owned by the seller.- Has no mortgages attached and has been under the same ownership for the past10 years.- Is registered in the land registry or cadastre, or both, and is free of title disputes.- Is located in a periurban commercial zone, and no rezoning is required.- Consists of land and a building. The land area is 557.4 square meters (6,000square feet). A two-story warehouse of 929 square meters (10,000 square feet) islocated on the land. The warehouse is 10 years old, is in good condition, has noheating system and complies with all safety standards, building codes and legalrequirements. The property, consisting of land and building, will be transferred in itsentirety.- Will not be subject to renovations or additional construction following the purchase.- Has no trees, natural water sources, natural reserves or historical monuments ofany kind.- Will not be used for special purposes, and no special permits, such as forresidential use, industrial plants, waste storage or certain types of agriculturalactivities, are required.- Has no occupants, and no other party holds a legal interest in it.
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 20
Registering Property - Estonia
Figure – Registering Property in Estonia and comparator economies – Ranking and Score
DB 2019 Registering Property Score
0 100
92.96: Lithuania (Rank: 3)
91.02: Estonia (Rank: 6)
89.88: Denmark (Rank: 11)
81.45: Latvia (Rank: 25)
80.73: Finland (Rank: 28)
77.17: Regional Average (OECD high income)
Note: The ranking of economies on the ease of registering property is determined by sorting their scores for registering property. Thesescores are the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators.
Figure – Registering Property in Estonia – Procedure, Time and Cost
This symbol is shown beside procedure numbers that take place simultaneously with the previous procedure.*
Note: Online procedures account for 0.5 days in the total time calculation. For economies that have a different procedure list for men andwomen, the graph shows the time for women. For more information on methodology, see the website( ). For details on the procedures reflected here, see the summary below.
Doing Businesshttp://doingbusiness.org/en/methodology
Procedures (number)1 2 3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Tim
e (d
ays)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
Cost
(% o
f pro
pert
y va
lue)
Time (days) Cost (% of property value)
Indicator Estonia OECD highincome
Best RegulatoryPerformance
Procedures (number) 3 4.7 1 (4 Economies)
Time (days) 17.5 20.1 1 (New Zealand)
Cost (% of property value) 0.5 4.2 0.0 (Saudi Arabia)
Quality of the land administration index (0-30) 27.5 23.0 None in 2017/18
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 21
Figure – Registering Property in Estonia and comparator economies – Measure of Quality
Estonia Denmark Finland Latvia Lithuania OECD high income
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Inde
x sc
ore
27.524.5
26.5
21.5
28.5
23.0
Details – Registering Property in Estonia – Procedure, Time and Cost
Takes place simultaneously with previous procedure.
No. Procedures Time to Complete Associated Costs
1 A notary prepares the Sale-purchase Agreement & the Agreement onTransfer of the Ownership of the Real Estate, and the parties sign it at thenotary’s office
: NotaryAgencyPursuant to Estonian law, it is mandatory that all transactions related to the transfer ofreal estate are notarized by a notary public. The parties may prepare the sale and purchaseagreement in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Estonia. However, the notarywill review it and if the agreement is not in accordance with the law, then the notary willamend the agreement or ask parties of the agreement to modify the agreement inaccordance with the law, since the notary is financially liable for any potential mistakesor law violations. Copies of all documents related to the agreement (transaction data,power of attorneys, documents concerning acquisition of the property, copies of identitydocuments, etc) shall be delivered to the notary’s office 3-4 days before the conclusion ifthe agreement. All originals shall be submitted to the notary on the day of the conclusionof the agreement. In case a document has not been issued in the Republic of Estonia, thedocument shall be certified by an apostille or legalized and translated into Estonian priorto the conclusion of the agreement. Since 2007 notaries use the E-Notary program whichfacilitates the preparation of notarial deeds. E-Notary offers contract templates andnecessary data about parties to and object of a transaction come from different registers.By entering personal identification code or the name of a person into the box of details ofthe party, E-Notary finds the respective individual and completes, based on the data of thePopulation Register, the rest of the blank boxes - name etc. Upon the entry of registeredimmovable number, E-Notary finds and displays, based on the data of the electronic LandRegister, other data related to the registered immovable – address, area etc. Once thecontract is signed, the notary makes digital copy of the contract and the contract is thereofforwarded electronically to the Land Register.
9 days EUR 2,526.83;(Notary fee accordingto the Notary FeesAct (Part 3 Article 22)is EUR 958.65 +0.14% of the amountof the transactionvalue exceeding EUR639,120. As this is acase of a bilateraltransaction the notaryfee for certifying thetransaction is doublethe full fee)
2 Payment of the state fee (stamp duty) at a commercial bank: Commercial BankAgency
The state fee for making the changes in the Land Register must be paid prior to applyingfor registration.
Less than one day,online
EUR 1,370.89; (If thetransaction value ismore than EUR639,120, the full statefee rate of 0.16% ofthe transaction valuewill apply but notmore than EUR2,560). (Appendix 2,State Fees Act of01.01.2015))
3 A notarized application is filed to the Land Register and correspondingentries are made to the Land Register
: Land RegisterAgencyThe notarized application to the Land Register is filed to transfer the ownership of thereal estate to the buyer in the Land Register Book. As of June 1, 2007, this applicationcan be filed online through the "e-notary" system which allows the notary to submit theapplication electronically without using any paper application. Computerization ofproperty records at the Land Registry have been ongoing for a few years has finally beencompleted at the end of 2008. Land Register shall publish a register notice regarding aReal Estate, which has not yet been entered in the Land Register only before opening aregister part for an immovable in the register. The notice is published in the officialpublication Ametlikud Teadaanded and, if necessary, in any other manner available to thepersons concerned. In case the Real Estate is already registered in the Land Register (asin this case), no publication is necessary. The documentation shall include: (i) NotarizedSale Purchase Agreement and Agreement of the Transfer of the Ownership of Real Estate(obtained in Procedure 1). (ii) Receipt of payment of state fee (obtained in Procedure 2)
8 days Already paid inProcedure 2
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 22
Details – Registering Property in Estonia – Measure of Quality
Answer Score
Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) 8.0
What is the institution in charge of immovable property registration? Land RegisterDepartment ofTartu CountyCourt
In what format are the majority of title or deed records kept in the largest business city—in apaper format or in a computerized format (scanned or fully digital)?
Computer/Fullydigital
2.0
Is there an electronic database for checking for encumbrances (liens, mortgages, restrictionsand the like)?
Yes 1.0
Institution in charge of the plans showing legal boundaries in the largest business city: Estonian LandBoard
In what format are the majority of maps of land plots kept in the largest business city—in apaper format or in a computerized format (scanned or fully digital)?
Computer/Fullydigital
2.0
Is there an electronic database for recording boundaries, checking plans and providingcadastral information (geographic information system)?
Yes 1.0
Is the information recorded by the immovable property registration agency and the cadastralor mapping agency kept in a single database, in different but linked databases or in separatedatabases?
Differentdatabases butlinked
1.0
Do the immovable property registration agency and cadastral or mapping agency use thesame identification number for properties?
Yes 1.0
Transparency of information index (0–6) 4.0
Who is able to obtain information on land ownership at the agency in charge of immovableproperty registration in the largest business city?
Anyone whopays the officialfee
1.0
Is the list of documents that are required to complete any type of property transaction madepublicly available–and if so, how?
Yes, online 0.5
Link for online access: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/501072015002/consolide/current
Is the applicable fee schedule for any property transaction at the agency in charge ofimmovable property registration in the largest business city made publicly available–and ifso, how?
Yes, online 0.5
Link for online access: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/tolkelisa/5190/2201/6005/2.pdf#
Does the agency in charge of immovable property registration commit to delivering a legallybinding document that proves property ownership within a specific time frame–and if so, howdoes it communicate the service standard?
Yes, online 0.5
Link for online access: www.riigiteataja.ee. According tothe law, anyactions must bedone within 30days.
Is there a specific and separate mechanism for filing complaints about a problem thatoccurred at the agency in charge of immovable property registration?
No 0.0
Contact information:
Are there publicly available official statistics tracking the number of transactions at theimmovable property registration agency?
Yes 0.5
Number of property transfers in the largest business city in 2017: 63115.0
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 23
Who is able to consult maps of land plots in the largest business city? Freely accessibleby anyone
0.5
Is the applicable fee schedule for accessing maps of land plots made publicly available—and if so, how?
No cost 0.5
Link for online access: http://xgis.maaamet.ee/maps/XGis?app_id=UU82A&user_id=at&LANG=2&WIDTH=1300&HEIGHT=720&zlevel=0,552500,6505000
Does the cadastral or mapping agency commit to delivering an updated map within aspecific time frame—and if so, how does it communicate the service standard?
No 0.0
Link for online access: http://geoportaal.maaamet.ee/eng/
Is there a specific and separate mechanism for filing complaints about a problem thatoccurred at the cadastral or mapping agency?
No 0.0
Contact information:
Geographic coverage index (0–8) 8.0
Are all privately held land plots in the economy formally registered at the immovable propertyregistry?
Yes 2.0
Are all privately held land plots in the largest business city formally registered at theimmovable property registry?
Yes 2.0
Are all privately held land plots in the economy mapped? Yes 2.0
Are all privately held land plots in the largest business city mapped? Yes 2.0
Land dispute resolution index (0–8) 7.5
Does the law require that all property sale transactions be registered at the immovableproperty registry to make them opposable to third parties?
Yes 1.5
Is the system of immovable property registration subject to a state or private guarantee? Yes 0.5
Is there a specific compensation mechanism to cover for losses incurred by parties whoengaged in good faith in a property transaction based on erroneous information certified bythe immovable property registry?
No 0.0
Does the legal system require a control of legality of the documents necessary for a propertytransaction (e.g., checking the compliance of contracts with requirements of the law)?
Yes 0.5
If yes, who is responsible for checking the legality of the documents? Registrar; Notary.
Does the legal system require verification of the identity of the parties to a propertytransaction?
Yes 0.5
If yes, who is responsible for verifying the identity of the parties? Notary.
Is there a national database to verify the accuracy of identity documents? Yes 1.0
For a standard land dispute between two local businesses over tenure rights of a propertyworth 50 times gross national income (GNI) per capita and located in the largest businesscity, what court would be in charge of the case in the first instance?
Harju CountyCourt
How long does it take on average to obtain a decision from the first-instance court for such acase (without appeal)?
Less than a year 3.0
Are there any statistics on the number of land disputes in the first instance? Yes 0.5
Number of land disputes in the largest business city in 2017: 389 cases
Equal access to property rights index (-2–0) 0.0
Do unmarried men and unmarried women have equal ownership rights to property? Yes
Do married men and married women have equal ownership rights to property? Yes 0.0
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 24
Getting Credit
This topic explores two sets of issues—the strength of credit reporting systems and the effectiveness of collateral and bankruptcy laws infacilitating lending. The most recent round of data collection for the project was completed in May 2018.
.See the methodology for more
information
What the indicators measure
Strength of legal rights index (0–12)
Rights of borrowers and lenders throughcollateral laws (0-10)
•
Protection of secured creditors’ rights throughbankruptcy laws (0-2)
•
Depth of credit information index (0–8)
Scope and accessibility of credit informationdistributed by credit bureaus and credit registries(0-8)
•
Credit bureau coverage (% of adults)
Number of individuals and firms listed in largestcredit bureau as a percentage of adult population
•
Credit registry coverage (% of adults)
Number of individuals and firms listed in creditregistry as a percentage of adult population
•
Case study assumptions
assesses the sharing of credit information and the legal rights ofborrowers and lenders with respect to secured transactions through 2 sets ofindicators. The depth of credit information index measures rules and practicesaffecting the coverage, scope and accessibility of credit information availablethrough a credit registry or a credit bureau. The strength of legal rights indexmeasures the degree to which collateral and bankruptcy laws protect the rights ofborrowers and lenders and thus facilitate lending. For each economy it is firstdetermined whether a unitary secured transactions system exists. Then two casescenarios, case A and case B, are used to determine how a nonpossessory securityinterest is created, publicized and enforced according to the law. Special emphasisis given to how the collateral registry operates (if registration of security interests ispossible). The case scenarios involve a secured borrower, company ABC, and asecured lender, BizBank.
Doing Business
In some economies the legal framework for secured transactions will allow only caseA or case B (not both) to apply. Both cases examine the same set of legal provisionsrelating to the use of movable collateral.
Several assumptions about the secured borrower (ABC) and lender (BizBank)are used:
- ABC is a domestic limited liability company (or its legal equivalent).- ABC has up to 50 employees.- ABC has its headquarters and only base of operations in the economy’s largestbusiness city. For 11 economies the data are also collected for the second largestbusiness city.- Both ABC and BizBank are 100% domestically owned.
The case scenarios also involve assumptions. In case A, as collateral for the loan,ABC grants BizBank a nonpossessory security interest in one category of movableassets, for example, its machinery or its inventory. ABC wants to keep bothpossession and ownership of the collateral. In economies where the law does notallow nonpossessory security interests in movable property, ABC and BizBank use afiduciary transfer-of-title arrangement (or a similar substitute for nonpossessorysecurity interests).
In case B, ABC grants BizBank a business charge, enterprise charge, floatingcharge or any charge that gives BizBank a security interest over ABC’s combinedmovable assets (or as much of ABC’s movable assets as possible). ABC keepsownership and possession of the assets.
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 25
Getting Credit - Estonia
Figure – Getting Credit in Estonia and comparator economies – Ranking and Score
DB 2019 Getting Credit Score
0 100
85.00: Latvia (Rank: 12)
70.00: Denmark (Rank: 44)
70.00: Estonia (Rank: 44)
70.00: Lithuania (Rank: 44)
65.00: Finland (Rank: 60)
64.12: Regional Average (OECD high income)
Note: The ranking of economies on the ease of getting credit is determined by sorting their scores for getting credit. These scores are thesum of the scores for the strength of legal rights index and the depth of credit information index.
Figure – Legal Rights in Estonia and comparator economies
Estonia Denmark Finland Latvia Lithuania OECD high income
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Inde
x Sc
ore
78
79
6 6.1
Indicator Estonia OECD highincome
Best RegulatoryPerformance
Strength of legal rights index (0-12) 7 6.1 12 (5 Economies)
Depth of credit information index (0-8) 7 6.7 8 (42 Economies)
Credit registry coverage (% of adults) 0 21.8 100.0 (4 Economies)
Credit bureau coverage (% of adults) 26.9 65.3 100.0 (25 Economies)
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 26
Details – Legal Rights in Estonia
Strength of legal rights index (0-12) 7
Does an integrated or unified legal framework for secured transactions that extends to the creation, publicity andenforcement of functional equivalents to security interests in movable assets exist in the economy?
No
Does the law allow businesses to grant a non possessory security right in a single category of movable assets, withoutrequiring a specific description of collateral?
No
Does the law allow businesses to grant a non possessory security right in substantially all of its assets, without requiring aspecific description of collateral?
Yes
May a security right extend to future or after-acquired assets, and does it extend automatically to the products, proceeds andreplacements of the original assets?
No
Is a general description of debts and obligations permitted in collateral agreements; can all types of debts and obligations besecured between parties; and can the collateral agreement include a maximum amount for which the assets areencumbered?
Yes
Is a collateral registry in operation for both incorporated and non-incorporated entities, that is unified geographically and byasset type, with an electronic database indexed by debtor's name?
Yes
Does a notice-based collateral registry exist in which all functional equivalents can be registered? No
Does a modern collateral registry exist in which registrations, amendments, cancellations and searches can be performedonline by any interested third party?
Yes
Are secured creditors paid first (i.e. before tax claims and employee claims) when a debtor defaults outside an insolvencyprocedure?
Yes
Are secured creditors paid first (i.e. before tax claims and employee claims) when a business is liquidated? Yes
Are secured creditors subject to an automatic stay on enforcement when a debtor enters a court-supervised reorganizationprocedure? Does the law protect secured creditors’ rights by providing clear grounds for relief from the stay and sets a timelimit for it?
No
Does the law allow parties to agree on out of court enforcement at the time a security interest is created? Does the law allowthe secured creditor to sell the collateral through public auction or private tender, as well as, for the secured creditor to keepthe asset in satisfaction of the debt?
Yes
Figure – Credit Information in Estonia and comparator economies
Estonia Denmark Finland Latvia Lithuania OECD high income
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Inde
x Sc
ore
76 6
8 8
6.7
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 27
Details – Credit Information in Estonia
Note: An economy receives a score of 1 if there is a "yes" to either bureau or registry. If the credit bureau or registry is not operational orcovers less than 5% of the adult population, the total score on the depth of credit information index is 0.
Depth of credit information index (0-8) Creditbureau
Creditregistry
Score
Are data on both firms and individuals distributed? Yes No 1
Are both positive and negative credit data distributed? No No 0
Are data from retailers or utility companies - in addition to data from banks andfinancial institutions - distributed?
Yes No 1
Are at least 2 years of historical data distributed? (Credit bureaus and registriesthat distribute more than 10 years of negative data or erase data on defaults assoon as they are repaid obtain a score of 0 for this component.)
Yes No 1
Are data on loan amounts below 1% of income per capita distributed? Yes No 1
By law, do borrowers have the right to access their data in the credit bureau orcredit registry?
Yes No 1
Can banks and financial institutions access borrowers’ credit information online(for example, through an online platform, a system-to-system connection orboth)?
Yes No 1
Are bureau or registry credit scores offered as a value-added service to helpbanks and financial institutions assess the creditworthiness of borrowers?
Yes No 1
Total Score ("yes" to either public bureau or private registry) 7
Coverage Credit bureau Credit registry
Number of individuals 175,000 0
Number of firms 52,000 0
Total 227,000 0
Percentage of adult population 26.9 0
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 28
Protecting Minority Investors
This topic measures the strength of minority shareholder protections against misuse of corporate assets by directors for their personal gainas well as shareholder rights, governance safeguards and corporate transparency requirements that reduce the risk of abuse. The mostrecent round of data collection for the project was completed in May 2018. .See the methodology for more information
What the indicators measure
: Review andapproval requirements for related-partytransactions; Disclosure requirements for related-party transactions
• Extent of disclosure index (0–10)
: Abilityof minority shareholders to sue and holdinterested directors liable for prejudicial related-party transactions; Available legal remedies(damages, disgorgement of profits, fines,imprisonment, rescission of the transaction)
• Extent of director liability index (0–10)
:Access to internal corporate documents;Evidence obtainable during trial and allocation oflegal expenses
• Ease of shareholder suits index (0–10)
: Simple average of the extent ofdisclosure, extent of director liability and ease ofshareholder indices
• Extent of conflict of interest regulation index(0–10)
:Shareholders’ rights and role in major corporatedecisions
• Extent of shareholder rights index (0-10)
:Governance safeguards protecting shareholdersfrom undue board control and entrenchment
• Extent of ownership and control index (0-10)
:Corporate transparency on ownership stakes,compensation, audits and financial prospects
• Extent of corporate transparency index (0-10)
: Simple average of the extent of shareholdersrights, extent of ownership and control and extentof corporate transparency indices
• Extent of shareholder governance index (0–10)
: Simple average of the extent of conflict ofinterest regulation and extent of shareholdergovernance indices
• Strength of minority investor protection index(0–10)
Case study assumptions
To make the data comparable across economies, a case study uses severalassumptions about the business and the transaction.
- Is a publicly traded corporation listed on the economy’s most important stockexchange. If there are fewer than ten listed companies or if there is no stockexchange in the economy, it is assumed that Buyer is a large private company withmultiple shareholders.- Has a board of directors and a chief executive officer (CEO) who may legally act onbehalf of Buyer where permitted, even if this is not specifically required by law.- Has a supervisory board in economies with a two-tier board system on which Mr.James appointed 60% of the shareholder-elected members.- Has not adopted bylaws or articles of association that go beyond the minimumrequirements. Does not follow codes, principles, recommendations or guidelines thatare not mandatory.- Is a manufacturing company with its own distribution network.
The business (Buyer):
- Mr. James owns 60% of Buyer, sits on Buyer’s board of directors and elected twodirectors to Buyer’s five-member board.- Mr. James also owns 90% of Seller, a company that operates a chain of retailhardware stores. Seller recently closed a large number of its stores.- Mr. James proposes that Buyer purchase Seller’s unused fleet of trucks to expandBuyer’s distribution of its food products, a proposal to which Buyer agrees. The priceis equal to 10% of Buyer’s assets and is higher than the market value.- The proposed transaction is part of the company’s principal activity and is notoutside the authority of the company.- Buyer enters into the transaction. All required approvals are obtained, and allrequired disclosures made—that is, the transaction was not entered into fraudulently.- The transaction causes damages to Buyer. Shareholders sue Mr. James and theexecutives and directors that approved the transaction.
The transaction involves the following details:
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 29
Protecting Minority Investors - Estonia
Figure – Protecting Minority Investors in Estonia and comparator economies – Ranking and Score
DB 2019 Protecting Minority Investors Score
0 100
66.67: Denmark (Rank: 38)
66.67: Lithuania (Rank: 38)
64.21: Regional Average (OECD high income)
63.33: Latvia (Rank: 51)
58.33: Finland (Rank: 72)
56.67: Estonia (Rank: 83)
Note: The ranking of economies on the strength of minority investor protections is determined by sorting their scores for protecting minorityinvestors. These scores are the simple average of the scores for the extent of conflict of interest regulation index and the extent ofshareholder governance index.
Figure – Protecting Minority Investors in Estonia and comparator economies – Measure of Quality
Estonia
Denmark
Finland
Latvia
Lithuania
OECD high income
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Sub-Indicator Score
6 3 8 3 8 6
9 5 7 5 6 8
9 4 6 2 6 8
8 4 5 5 7 9
10 4 7 6 6 7
7.4 5.5 6.5 5.2 6.3 7.4
Extent of corporate transparency index (0-10) Extent of director liability index (0-10) Extent of disclosure index (0-10)Extent of ownership and control index (0-10) Extent of shareholder rights index (0-10) Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)
Indicator Estonia OECD highincome
Best RegulatoryPerformance
Extent of disclosure index (0-10) 8.0 6.5 10 (13 Economies)
Extent of director liability index (0-10) 3.0 5.3 10 (Cambodia)
Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) 6.0 7.3 10 (Djibouti)
Extent of shareholder rights index (0-10) 8.0 6.4 10 (Kazakhstan)
Extent of ownership and control index (0-10) 3.0 5.4 None in 2017/18
Extent of corporate transparency index (0-10) 6.0 7.6 10 (6 Economies)
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 30
Details – Protecting Minority Investors in Estonia – Measure of Quality
Answer Score
Extent of conflict of interest regulation index (0-10) 5.7
Extent of disclosure index (0-10) 8.0
Whose decision is sufficient to approve the Buyer-Seller transaction? (0-3) Board ofdirectorsexcludinginterestedmembers
2.0
Must an external body review the terms of the transaction before it takes place? (0-1) No 0.0
Must Mr. James disclose his conflict of interest to the board of directors? (0-2) Full disclosure ofall material facts
2.0
Must Buyer disclose the transaction in periodic filings (e.g. annual reports)? (0-2) Disclosure on thetransaction andon the conflict ofinterest
2.0
Must Buyer immediately disclose the transaction to the public? (0-2) Disclosure on thetransaction andon the conflict ofinterest
2.0
Extent of director liability index (0-10) 3.0
Can shareholders representing 10% of Buyer's share capital sue for the damage thetransaction caused to Buyer? (0-1)
No 0.0
Can shareholders hold Mr. James liable for the damage the transaction caused to Buyer? (0-2)
Liable if negligent 1.0
Can shareholders hold the other directors liable for the damage the transaction caused toBuyer (0-2)
Liable if negligent 1.0
Must Mr. James pay damages for the harm caused to Buyer upon a successful claim byshareholders? (0-1)
Yes 1.0
Must Mr. James repay profits made from the transaction upon a successful claim byshareholders? (0-1)
No 0.0
Is Mr. James disqualified upon a successful claim by shareholders? (0-1) No 0.0
Can a court void the transaction upon a successful claim by shareholders? (0-2) Only in case offraud or bad faith
0.0
Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) 6.0
Before suing, can shareholders representing 10% of Buyer's share capital inspect thetransaction documents? (0-1)
Yes 1.0
Can the plaintiff obtain any documents from the defendant and witnesses at trial? (0-3) Any relevantdocument
3.0
Can the plaintiff request categories of documents from the defendant without identifyingspecific ones? (0-1)
No 0.0
Can the plaintiff directly question the defendant and witnesses at trial? (0-2) No 0.0
Is the level of proof required for civil suits lower than that of criminal cases? (0-1) Yes 1.0
Can shareholder plaintiffs recover their legal expenses from the company? (0-2) Yes if successful 1.0
Extent of shareholder governance index (0-10) 5.7
Extent of shareholder rights index (0-10) 8.0
Does the sale of 51% of Buyer's assets require shareholder approval? No 0.0
Can shareholders representing 10% of Buyer's share capital call for a meeting ofshareholders?
Yes 1.0
Must Buyer obtain its shareholders’ approval every time it issues new shares? Yes 1.0
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 31
Do shareholders automatically receive preemption rights every time Buyer issues newshares?
Yes 1.0
Must shareholders approve the election and dismissal of the external auditor? Yes 1.0
Are changes to the rights of a class of shares only possible if the holders of the affectedshares approve?
Yes 1.0
Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, does the sale of 51% of its assets requiremember approval?
Yes 1.0
Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, can members representing 10% call for ameeting of members?
Yes 1.0
Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, must all or almost all members consent to add anew member?
No 0.0
Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, must a member first offer to sell their interest tothe existing members before they can sell to non-members?
Yes 1.0
Extent of ownership and control index (0-10) 3.0
Is it forbidden to appoint the same individual as CEO and chairperson of the board ofdirectors?
No 0.0
Must the board of directors include independent and nonexecutive board members? No 0.0
Can shareholders remove members of the board of directors without cause before the endof their term?
Yes 1.0
Must the board of directors include a separate audit committee exclusively comprising boardmembers?
No 0.0
Must a potential acquirer make a tender offer to all shareholders upon acquiring 50% ofBuyer?
Yes 1.0
Must Buyer pay declared dividends within a maximum period set by law? No 0.0
Is a subsidiary prohibited from acquiring shares issued by its parent company? No 0.0
Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, must Buyer have a mechanism to resolvedisagreements among members?
Yes 1.0
Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, must a potential acquirer make a tender offer toall shareholders upon acquiring 50% of Buyer?
No 0.0
Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, must Buyer distribute profits within a maximumperiod set by law?
No 0.0
Extent of corporate transparency index (0-10) 6.0
Must Buyer disclose direct and indirect beneficial ownership stakes representing 5%? Yes 1.0
Must Buyer disclose information about board members’ primary employment anddirectorships in other companies?
No 0.0
Must Buyer disclose the compensation of individual managers? No 0.0
Must a detailed notice of general meeting be sent 21 days before the meeting? Yes 1.0
Can shareholders representing 5% of Buyer’s share capital put items on the general meetingagenda?
Yes 1.0
Must Buyer's annual financial statements be audited by an external auditor? Yes 1.0
Must Buyer disclose its audit reports to the public? Yes 1.0
Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, must members meet at least once a year? No 0.0
Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, can members representing 5% put items on themeeting agenda?
No 0.0
Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, must Buyer's annual financial statements beaudited by an external auditor?
Yes 1.0
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 32
Paying Taxes
This topic records the taxes and mandatory contributions that a medium-size company must pay or withhold in a given year, as well as theadministrative burden of paying taxes and contributions and complying with postfiling procedures (VAT refund and tax audit). The most recentround of data collection for the project was completed in May 2018 covering for the Paying Taxes indicator calendar year 2017 (January 1,2017 – December 31, 2017). See the methodology for more information.
What the indicators measure
Tax payments for a manufacturing company in2017 (number per year adjusted for electronicand joint filing and payment)
Total number of taxes and contributions paid orwithheld, including consumption taxes (valueadded tax, sales tax or goods and service tax)
•
Method and frequency of filing and payment•Time required to comply with 3 major taxes(hours per year)
Collecting information, computing tax payable•Preparing separate tax accounting books, ifrequired
•
Completing tax return, filing with agencies•Arranging payment or withholding•
Total tax and contribution rate (% of commercialprofits)
Profit or corporate income tax•Social contributions, labor taxes paid byemployer
•
Property and property transfer taxes•Dividend, capital gains, financial transactionstaxes
•
Waste collection, vehicle, road and other taxes•Postfiling Index
Time to comply with a VAT refund (hours)•Time to obtain a VAT refund (weeks)•Time to comply with a corporate income taxcorrection (hours)
•
Time to complete a corporate income taxcorrection (weeks)
•
Case study assumptions
Using a case scenario, records taxes and mandatory contributions amedium size company must pay in a year, and measures the administrative burdenof paying taxes, contributions and dealing with postfiling processes. Information isalso compiled on frequency of filing and payments, time taken to comply with taxlaws, time taken to comply with the requirements of postfiling processes and timewaiting.
Doing Business
To make data comparable across economies, several assumptions are used:- TaxpayerCo is a medium-size business that started operations on January 1, 2016.It produces ceramic flowerpots and sells them at retail.
Taxes andmandatory contributions are measured at all levels of government.
- In June 2017, TaxpayerCo. makes a large capital purchase: the value of themachine is 65 times income per capita of the economy. Sales are equally spread permonth (1,050 times income per capita divided by 12) and cost of goods sold areequally expensed per month (875 times income per capita divided by 12). Themachinery seller is registered for VAT and excess input VAT incurred in June will befully recovered after four consecutive months if the VAT rate is the same for inputs,sales and the machine and the tax reporting period is every month. Input VAT willexceed Output VAT in June 2017.
All taxes and contributionsrecorded are paid in the second year of operation (calendar year 2017).
The VAT refund process:
- An error in calculation of income tax liability (for example, use of incorrect taxdepreciation rates, or incorrectly treating an expense as tax deductible) leads to anincorrect income tax return and a corporate income tax underpayment. TaxpayerCo.discovered the error and voluntarily notified the tax authority. The value of theunderpaid income tax liability is 5% of the corporate income tax liabilitydue. TaxpayerCo. submits corrected information after the deadline for submitting theannual tax return, but within the tax assessment period.
The corporate income tax audit process:
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 33
Paying Taxes - Estonia
Figure – Paying Taxes in Estonia and comparator economies – Ranking and Score
DB 2019 Paying Taxes Score
0 100
91.14: Denmark (Rank: 9)
90.64: Finland (Rank: 11)
89.74: Latvia (Rank: 13)
89.56: Estonia (Rank: 14)
88.66: Lithuania (Rank: 18)
83.32: Regional Average (OECD high income)
Note: The ranking of economies on the ease of paying taxes is determined by sorting their scores for paying taxes. These scores are thesimple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, with a threshold and a nonlinear transformation applied to one of thecomponent indicators, the total tax and contribution rate. The threshold is defined as the total tax and contribution rate at the 15th percentileof the overall distribution for all years included in the analysis up to and including Doing Business 2015, which is 26.1%. All economies with atotal tax and contribution rate below this threshold receive the same score as the economy at the threshold.
Figure – Paying Taxes in Estonia and comparator economies – Measure of Quality
Estonia Denmark Finland Latvia Lithuania OECD high income
0
20
40
60
80
100
Inde
x sc
ore
99.3889.06 93.09 98.11 97.52
84.41
Indicator Estonia OECD highincome
Best RegulatoryPerformance
Payments (number per year) 8 11.2 3 (Hong Kong SAR, China)
Time (hours per year) 50 159.4 49 (Singapore)
Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) 48.7 39.8 26.1% (32 Economies)
Postfiling index (0-100) 99.38 84.41 None in 2017/18
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 34
Details – Paying Taxes in Estonia
Tax ormandatorycontribution
Payments(number)
Notes onPayments
Time(hours)
Statutorytax rate
Tax base Total taxandcontributionrate (% ofprofit)
Notes onTTCR
Socialsecuritycontributions
0.0 online andjointly
31.0 33% gross salaries 37.22
Dividend tax 1.0 online 5.0 20/80 distributeddividends
7.91
Land tax 1.0 online 2.5% propertyvalue
1.89
Unemployment insurancecontributions
0.0 online andjointly
0.8% gross salaries 0.78
Fringe benefittax
0.0 online andjointly
66.25% fringe benefits 0.75 0.00747292699309493
State fee(stamp duty)on propertytransfer
1.0 online EUR 630 fixed feeaccording toschedule
0.09
Heavy vehicletax
1.0 online EUR 275 fixed feedepending ontype ofvehicle
0.04
Advertisingtax
1.0 online EUR 0.55 /m2/ day
fixed fee 0.00 small amount
Stamp duty 1.0 online contract value 0.00 small amount
Fuel tax 1.0 included inprice of fuel
0.00 small amount
Employeepaid -Compulsorypensioncontributions
0.0 online andjointly
2% gross salaries 0.00 withheld
Employeepaid -Unemployment insurancecontributions
0.0 online andjointly
1.6% gross salaries 0.00 withheld
Value addedtax (VAT)
1.0 online 14.0 20% value added 0.00 not included
Totals 8 50 48.7
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 35
Details – Paying Taxes in Estonia – Tax by Type
Taxes by type Answer
Profit tax (% of profit) 7.9
Labor tax and contributions (% of profit) 38.8
Other taxes (% of profit) 2
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 36
Details – Paying Taxes in Estonia – Measure of Quality
Names of taxes have been standardized. For instance income tax, profit tax, tax on company's income are all named corporateincome tax in this table.The hours for VAT include all the VAT and sales taxes applicable.The hours for Social Security include all the hours for labor taxes and mandatory contributions in general.The postfiling index is the average of the scores on time to comply with VAT refund, time to obtain a VAT refund, time to comply with acorporate income tax correction and time to complete a corporate income tax correction.N/A = Not applicable.
Notes:
Answer Score
Postfiling index (0-100) 99.38
VAT refunds
Does VAT exist? Yes
Does a VAT refund process exist per the case study? Yes
Restrictions on VAT refund process None
Percentage of cases exposed to a VAT audit (%) 0% - 24%
Is there a mandatory carry forward period? No
Time to comply with VAT refund (hours) 1.3 97.5
Time to obtain a VAT refund (weeks) 2.3 100
Corporate income tax audits
Does corporate income tax exist? Yes
Percentage of cases exposed to a corporate income tax audit (%) 0% - 24%
Time to comply with a corporate income tax correction (hours) 1.5 100
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) No tax audit percase studyscenario
100
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 37
Trading across Borders
records the time and cost associated with the logistical process of exporting and importing goods. measuresthe time and cost (excluding tariffs) associated with three sets of procedures—documentary compliance, border compliance and domestictransport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The most recent round of data collection for the projectwas completed in May 2018. .
Doing Business Doing Business
See the methodology for more information
What the indicators measure
Documentary compliance
Obtaining, preparing and submitting documentsduring transport, clearance, inspections and portor border handling in origin economy
•
Obtaining, preparing and submitting documentsrequired by destination economy and any transiteconomies
•
Covers all documents required by law and inpractice, including electronic submissions ofinformation
•
Border compliance
Customs clearance and inspections•Inspections by other agencies (if applied to morethan 20% of shipments)
•
Handling and inspections that take place at theeconomy’s port or border
•
Domestic transport
Loading or unloading of the shipment at thewarehouse or port/border
•
Transport between warehouse and port/border•Traffic delays and road police checks whileshipment is en route
•
Case study assumptions
To make the data comparable across economies, a few assumptions are madeabout the traded goods and the transactions:
Time is measured in hours, and 1 day is 24 hours (for example, 22 days arerecorded as 22×24=528 hours). If customs clearance takes 7.5 hours, the data arerecorded as is. Alternatively, suppose documents are submitted to a customs agencyat 8:00a.m., are processed overnight and can be picked up at 8:00a.m. the next day.The time for customs clearance would be recorded as 24 hours because the actualprocedure took 24 hours.
Time:
Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued areexcluded from the costs recorded. Costs are reported in U.S. dollars. Contributorsare asked to convert local currency into U.S. dollars based on the exchange rateprevailing on the day they answer the questionnaire. Contributors are private sectorexperts in international trade logistics and are informed about exchange rates.
Cost:
- For all 190 economies covered by , it is assumed a shipment is in awarehouse in the largest business city of the exporting economy and travels to awarehouse in the largest business city of the importing economy.- It is assumed each economy imports 15 metric tons of containerized auto parts (HS8708) from its natural import partner—the economy from which it imports the largestvalue (price times quantity) of auto parts. It is assumed each economy exports theproduct of its comparative advantage (defined by the largest export value) to itsnatural export partner—the economy that is the largest purchaser of this product.Shipment value is assumed to be $50,000.- The mode of transport is the one most widely used for the chosen export or importproduct and the trading partner, as is the seaport or land border crossing.- All electronic information submissions requested by any government agency inconnection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, preparedand submitted during the export or import process.- A port or border is a place (seaport or land border crossing) where merchandisecan enter or leave an economy.- Relevant government agencies include customs, port authorities, road police,border guards, standardization agencies, ministries or departments of agriculture orindustry, national security agencies and any other government authorities.
Assumptions of the case study:Doing Business
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 38
Trading across Borders - Estonia
Figure – Trading across Borders in Estonia and comparator economies – Ranking and Score
DB 2019 Trading Across Borders Score
0 100
99.92: Estonia (Rank: 17)
97.83: Lithuania (Rank: 19)
95.26: Latvia (Rank: 26)
94.21: Regional Average (OECD high income)
92.44: Finland (Rank: 34)
100.00: Denmark (Rank: 1)
Note: The ranking of economies on the ease of trading across borders is determined by sorting their scores for trading across borders. Thesescores are the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import.
Figure – Trading across Borders in Estonia – Time and Cost
Export-
BorderCompliance
Export-
DocumentaryCompliance
Import-
BorderCompliance
Import-
DocumentaryCompliance
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Tim
e (h
ours
)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2Co
st (U
SD)
2
0
1
0 0 0
1
0
Time (hours) Cost (USD)
Indicator Estonia OECD highincome
Best RegulatoryPerformance
Time to export: Border compliance (hours) 2 12.5 1 (19 Economies)
Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) 0 139.1 0 (19 Economies)
Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) 1 2.4 1 (26 Economies)
Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) 0 35.2 0 (20 Economies)
Time to import: Border compliance (hours) 0 8.5 0 (25 Economies)
Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) 0 100.2 0 (28 Economies)
Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) 1 3.4 1 (30 Economies)
Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) 0 24.9 0 (30 Economies)
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 39
Details – Trading across Borders in Estonia
Characteristics Export Import
Product HS 85 : Electrical machinery andequipment and parts thereof; soundrecorders and reproducers, televisionimage and sound recorders andreproducers, and parts and accessories ofsuch articles
HS 8708: Parts and accessories of motorvehicles
Trade partner Sweden Germany
Border Paldiski Estonia-Latvia border crossing
Distance (km) 6 190
Domestic transport time (hours) 2 4
Domestic transport cost (USD) 229 265
Details – Trading across Borders in Estonia – Components of Border Compliance
Time to Complete (hours) Associated Costs (USD)
Export: Clearance and inspections requiredby customs authorities
0.0 0.0
Export: Clearance and inspections requiredby agencies other than customs
0.0 0.0
Export: Port or border handling 2.0 0.0
Import: Clearance and inspections requiredby customs authorities
0.0 0.0
Import: Clearance and inspections requiredby agencies other than customs
0.0 0.0
Import: Port or border handling 0.0 0.0
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 40
Details – Trading across Borders in Estonia – Trade Documents
Export Import
CMR waybill CMR waybill
Commercial Invoice Commercial Invoice
Packing List Packing list
Intrastat Intrastat
SOLAS certificate
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 41
Enforcing Contracts
.
The enforcing contracts indicator measures the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, and thequality of judicial processes index, evaluating whether each economy has adopted a series of good practices that promote quality andefficiency in the court system. The most recent round of data collection was completed in May 2018. See the methodology for moreinformation
What the indicators measure
Time required to enforce a contract through thecourts (calendar days)
Time to file and serve the case•Time for trial and to obtain the judgment•Time to enforce the judgment•
Cost required to enforce a contract through thecourts (% of claim)
Attorney fees•Court fees•Enforcement fees•
Quality of judicial processes index (0-18)
Court structure and proceedings (-1-5)•Case management (0-6)•Court automation (0-4)•Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)•
Case study assumptions
The dispute in the case study involves the breach of a sales contract between 2domestic businesses. The case study assumes that the court hears an expert on thequality of the goods in dispute. This distinguishes the case from simple debtenforcement.
To make the data comparable across economies, uses severalassumptions about the case:- The dispute concerns a lawful transaction between two businesses (Seller andBuyer), both located in the economy’s largest business city. For 11 economies thedata are also collected for the second largest business city.- The buyer orders custom-made goods, then fails to pay alleging that the goods arenot of adequate quality.- The value of the dispute is 200% of the income per capita or the equivalent in localcurrency of USD 5,000, whichever is greater.- The seller sues the buyer before the court with jurisdiction over commercial casesworth 200% of income per capita or $5,000.- The seller requests the pretrial attachment of the defendant’s movable assets tosecure the claim.- The dispute on the quality of the goods requires an expert opinion.- The judge decides in favor of the seller; there is no appeal.- The seller enforces the judgment through a public sale of the buyer’s movableassets.
Doing Business
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 42
Enforcing Contracts - Estonia
Figure – Enforcing Contracts in Estonia and comparator economies – Ranking and Score
DB 2019 Enforcing Contracts Score
0 100
78.80: Lithuania (Rank: 7)
74.34: Estonia (Rank: 13)
73.92: Denmark (Rank: 14)
71.66: Latvia (Rank: 20)
67.65: Regional Average (OECD high income)
66.40: Finland (Rank: 46)
Note: The ranking of economies on the ease of enforcing contracts is determined by sorting their scores for enforcing contracts. Thesescores are the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators.
Figure – Enforcing Contracts in Estonia – Time and Cost
Denmark Estonia Finland Latvia Lithuania OECDhigh
income
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Tim
e (d
ays)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Cost
(% o
f cla
im v
alue
)485
23.3455
21.9 485
16.2469
23.1
370
23.6 582.421.2
Time (days) Cost (% of claim value)
Standardized Case
Claim value EUR 31,294
Court name Harju County Court
City Covered Tallinn
Indicator Estonia OECD highincome
Best RegulatoryPerformance
Time (days) 455 582.4 None in 2017/18
Cost (% of claim value) 21.9 21.2 None in 2017/18
Quality of judicial processes index (0-18) 13.5 11.5 None in 2017/18
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 43
Figure – Enforcing Contracts in Estonia and comparator economies – Measure of Quality
Estonia
Denmark
Finland
Latvia
Lithuania
OECD high income
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16Sub-Indicator Score
2.5 3.5 4 3.5
2.5 4.5 3.5 3.5
2.5 2 2.5 1.5
3 4.5 2 3
3 4.5 4 3.5
2.5 3.1 2.3 3.6
Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) Case management (0-6) Court automation (0-4) Court structure and proceedings (-1-5)
Details – Enforcing Contracts in Estonia
Indicator
Time (days) 455
Filing and service 60
Trial and judgment 320
Enforcement of judgment 75
Cost (% of claim value) 21.9
Attorney fees 9
Court fees 11.9
Enforcement fees 1
Quality of judicial processes index (0-18) 13.5
Court structure and proceedings (-1-5) 3.5
Case management (0-6) 3.5
Court automation (0-4) 4.0
Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) 2.5
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 44
Details – Enforcing Contracts in Estonia – Measure of Quality
Answer Score
Quality of judicial processes index (0-18) 13.5
Court structure and proceedings (-1-5) 3.5
1. Is there a court or division of a court dedicated solely to hearing commercial cases? No 0.0
2. Small claims court 1.5
2.a. Is there a small claims court or a fast-track procedure for small claims? Yes
2.b. If yes, is self-representation allowed? Yes
3. Is pretrial attachment available? Yes 1.0
4. Are new cases assigned randomly to judges? Yes, automatic 1.0
5. Does a woman's testimony carry the same evidentiary weight in court as a man's? Yes 0.0
Case management (0-6) 3.5
1. Time standards 0.0
1.a. Are there laws setting overall time standards for key court events in a civilcase?
Yes
1.b. If yes, are the time standards set for at least three court events? No
1.c. Are these time standards respected in more than 50% of cases? Yes
2. Adjournments 0.5
2.a. Does the law regulate the maximum number of adjournments that can begranted?
No
2.b. Are adjournments limited to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances? Yes
2.c. If rules on adjournments exist, are they respected in more than 50% of cases? Yes
3. Can two of the following four reports be generated about the competent court: (i) time todisposition report; (ii) clearance rate report; (iii) age of pending cases report; and (iv) singlecase progress report?
Yes 1.0
4. Is a pretrial conference among the case management techniques used before thecompetent court?
No 0.0
5. Are there any electronic case management tools in place within the competent court foruse by judges?
Yes 1.0
6. Are there any electronic case management tools in place within the competent court foruse by lawyers?
Yes 1.0
Court automation (0-4) 4.0
1. Can the initial complaint be filed electronically through a dedicated platform within thecompetent court?
yes 1.0
2. Is it possible to carry out service of process electronically for claims filed before thecompetent court?
Yes 1.0
3. Can court fees be paid electronically within the competent court? Yes 1.0
4. Publication of judgments 1.0
4.a Are judgments rendered in commercial cases at all levels made available to thegeneral public through publication in official gazettes, in newspapers or on theinternet or court website?
Yes
4.b. Are judgments rendered in commercial cases at the appellate and supremecourt level made available to the general public through publication in officialgazettes, in newspapers or on the internet or court website?
Yes
Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) 2.5
1. Arbitration 1.5
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 45
1.a. Is domestic commercial arbitration governed by a consolidated law orconsolidated chapter or section of the applicable code of civil procedureencompassing substantially all its aspects?
Yes
1.b. Are there any commercial disputes—aside from those that deal with publicorder or public policy—that cannot be submitted to arbitration?
No
1.c. Are valid arbitration clauses or agreements usually enforced by the courts? Yes
2. Mediation/Conciliation 1.0
2.a. Is voluntary mediation or conciliation available? Yes
2.b. Are mediation, conciliation or both governed by a consolidated law orconsolidated chapter or section of the applicable code of civil procedureencompassing substantially all their aspects?
Yes
2.c. Are there financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation or conciliation(i.e., if mediation or conciliation is successful, a refund of court filing fees, incometax credits or the like)?
No
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 46
Resolving Insolvency
studies the time, cost and outcome of insolvency proceedings involving domestic legal entities. These variables are used tocalculate the recovery rate, which is recorded as cents on the dollar recovered by secured creditors through reorganization, liquidation ordebt enforcement (foreclosure or receivership) proceedings. To determine the present value of the amount recovered by creditors,
uses the lending rates from the International Monetary Fund, supplemented with data from central banks and the EconomistIntelligence Unit. The most recent round of data collection was completed in May 2018. .
Doing Business
DoingBusiness
See the methodology for more information
What the indicators measure
Time required to recover debt (years)
Measured in calendar years•Appeals and requests for extension are included•
Cost required to recover debt (% of debtor’sestate)
Measured as percentage of estate value•Court fees•Fees of insolvency administrators•Lawyers’ fees•Assessors’ and auctioneers’ fees•Other related fees•
Outcome
Whether business continues operating as a goingconcern or business assets are sold piecemeal
•
Recovery rate for creditors
Measures the cents on the dollar recovered bysecured creditors
•
Outcome for the business (survival or not)determines the maximum value that can berecovered
•
Official costs of the insolvency proceedings arededucted
•
Depreciation of furniture is taken into account•Present value of debt recovered•
Strength of insolvency framework index (0- 16)
Sum of the scores of four component indices:•Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)•Management of debtor’s assets index (0-6)•Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)•Creditor participation index (0-4)•
Case study assumptions
To make the data on the time, cost and outcome comparable across economies,several assumptions about the business and the case are used:
- A hotel located in the largest city (or cities) has 201 employees and 50 suppliers.The hotel experiences financial difficulties.- The value of the hotel is 100% of the income per capita or the equivalent in localcurrency of USD 200,000, whichever is greater.- The hotel has a loan from a domestic bank, secured by a mortgage over the hotel’sreal estate. The hotel cannot pay back the loan, but makes enough money tooperate otherwise.
In addition, evaluates the quality of legal framework applicable tojudicial liquidation and reorganization proceedings and the extent to which bestinsolvency practices have been implemented in each economy covered.
Doing Business
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 47
Resolving Insolvency - Estonia
Figure – Resolving Insolvency in Estonia and comparator economies – Ranking and Score
DB 2019 Resolving Insolvency Score
0 100
92.81: Finland (Rank: 2)
85.13: Denmark (Rank: 6)
75.21: Regional Average (OECD high income)
62.51: Estonia (Rank: 47)
59.60: Latvia (Rank: 54)
46.87: Lithuania (Rank: 85)
Note: The ranking of economies on the ease of resolving insolvency is determined by sorting their scores for resolving insolvency. Thesescores are the simple average of the scores for the recovery rate and the strength of insolvency framework index.
Figure – Resolving Insolvency in Estonia – Time and Cost
Denmark Estonia Finland Latvia Lithuania OECDhigh
income
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Tim
e (y
ears
)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Cost
(% o
f est
ate)
1.0 4.0
3.0
9.0
0.9 3.5
1.5
10.0 2.3
15.0
1.79.3
Time (years) Cost (% of estate)
Indicator Estonia OECD highincome
Best RegulatoryPerformance
Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) 40.7 70.5 None in 2017/18
Time (years) 3.0 1.7 0.4 (Ireland)
Cost (% of estate) 9.0 9.3 1.0 (Norway)
Outcome (0 as piecemeal sale and 1 as going concern) 0 .. ..
Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) 13.0 11.9 None in 2017/18
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 48
Figure – Resolving Insolvency in Estonia and comparator economies – Measure of Quality
Note: Even if the economy’s legal framework includes provisions related to insolvency proceedings (liquidation or reorganization), theeconomy receives 0 points for the strength of insolvency framework index, if time, cost and outcome indicators are recorded as “no practice.”
Estonia
Denmark
Finland
Latvia
Lithuania
OECD high income
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16Sub-Indicator Score
5.5 2.5 3 2
6 3 2 1
6 3 3 2.5
5 2.5 2 2.5
4 2.5 1 0.5
5.3 2.8 2.2 1.9
Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) Creditor participation index (0-4)Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)
Figure – Resolving Insolvency in Estonia and comparator economies – Recovery Rate
Estonia Denmark Finland Latvia Lithuania OECD high income
0
20
40
60
80
100
Reco
very
rate
(cen
ts o
n th
e do
llar)
40.7
88.5 88.3
41.1 40.6
70.5
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 49
Details – Resolving Insolvency in Estonia
Indicator Answer Score
Proceeding liquidation Because Mirage is not able to make its loan payment and the bank will not renegotiate the loan, itis most probable that BizBank would first send Mirage a bankruptcy warning in case of non-payment. If Mirage still fails to pay, BizBank will file a bankruptcy petition against Mirage.Moreover, because Mirage is already unable to pay, the board of Mirage would itself be underobligation to file a bankruptcy application against Mirage without delay. Reorganization could notbe considered in a situation where Mirage is already in fact unable to meet its financial obligationsas opposed to the situation where the difficulty to meet its obligations is likely to occur in thefuture.
Outcome piecemeal sale In order to keep the hotel operating, creditors would have to finance its operations. The bank islikely to be interested in returning its money as soon as possible and not in lending more money tothe hotel, therefore, it would advocate for a piecemeal sale of the assets. The proportion ofbusinesses that survive insolvency as a going concern is significantly small.
Time (in years) 3.0 Generally, it takes around 3 years to resolve liquidation in Estonia. The main procedural stepsinclude: - filing of a bankruptcy petition; - appointment of an interim trustee (within 10-20 days afterthe acceptance of the bankruptcy petition); - court ruling of the county court (court of first instance)declaring bankruptcy, which can be appealed within 15 days after the publication of bankruptcynotice and the judgment of the court of second instance can also be appealed within 30 days; -first general meeting of creditors appointing the bankruptcy committee, confirming the insolvencyrepresentative (trustee), and deciding on the continuation or termination of the activities of theundertaking (within 15-30 days after the declaration of bankruptcy); - notification of claims bycreditors (no later than 2 months after publication of the bankruptcy notice); - general meeting(s)of creditors for the defense of claims (within 1-3 months after the deadline for notification ofclaims); - disputes over recognition of claims, recovery of assets, etc. (may take years); -preparation of the proposal for distribution of assets by the representative after the generalmeeting for the defense of claims, which may be contested within 10 days in court; - sale of assets(time varies); - distribution of assets according to the distribution plan (1 month).
Cost (% ofestate)
9.0 The cost associated with the case would amount to 9% from the value of the hotel. The majorexpenses will include fees of the insolvency representative (5%), attorneys’ fees (3%), and otherfees (1%).
Recovery rate(cents on thedollar)
40.7
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 50
Details – Resolving Insolvency in Estonia – Measure of Quality
Even if the economy’s legal framework includes provisions related to insolvency proceedings (liquidation or reorganization), theeconomy receives 0 points for the strength of insolvency framework index, if time, cost and outcome indicators are recorded as “no practice.”Note:
Answer Score
Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) 13.0
Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) 2.5
What procedures are available to a DEBTOR when commencing insolvency proceedings? (a) Debtor mayfile for bothliquidation andreorganization
1.0
Does the insolvency framework allow a CREDITOR to file for insolvency of the debtor? (b) Yes, but acreditor may filefor liquidationonly
0.5
What basis for commencement of the insolvency proceedings is allowed under theinsolvency framework?
(c) Both (a) and(b) options areavailable, butonly one of themneeds to becomplied with
1.0
Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) 5.5
Does the insolvency framework allow the continuation of contracts supplying essential goodsand services to the debtor?
Yes 1.0
Does the insolvency framework allow the rejection by the debtor of overly burdensomecontracts?
Yes 1.0
Does the insolvency framework allow avoidance of preferential transactions? Yes 1.0
Does the insolvency framework allow avoidance of undervalued transactions? Yes 1.0
Does the insolvency framework provide for the possibility of the debtor obtaining credit aftercommencement of insolvency proceedings?
Yes 1.0
Does the insolvency framework assign priority to post-commencement credit? (a) Yes over allpre-commencementcreditors,secured orunsecured
0.5
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) 2.0
Which creditors vote on the proposed reorganization plan? (b) Only creditorswhose rights areaffected by theproposed plan
1.0
Does the insolvency framework require that dissenting creditors in reorganization receive atleast as much as what they would obtain in a liquidation?
No 0.0
Are the creditors divided into classes for the purposes of voting on the reorganization plan,does each class vote separately and are creditors in the same class treated equally?
Yes 1.0
Creditor participation index (0-4) 3.0
Does the insolvency framework require approval by the creditors for selection orappointment of the insolvency representative?
Yes 1.0
Does the insolvency framework require approval by the creditors for sale of substantialassets of the debtor?
Yes 1.0
Does the insolvency framework provide that a creditor has the right to request informationfrom the insolvency representative?
No 0.0
Does the insolvency framework provide that a creditor has the right to object to decisionsaccepting or rejecting creditors' claims?
Yes 1.0
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 51
Labor Market Regulation
presents detailed data for the labor market regulation indicators on the website( ). The report does not present rankings of economies on these indicators or include the topic in the aggregateease of doing business score or ranking on the ease of doing business.
Doing Business Doing Businesshttp://www.doingbusiness.org
The most recent round of data collection was completed in May 2018. .See the methodology for more information
What the indicators measure
(i) whether fixed-term contracts are prohibited forpermanent tasks; (ii) maximum cumulative durationof fixed-term contracts; (iii) length of theprobationary period; (iv) minimum wage.
Hiring
(i) maximum number of working days allowed perweek; (ii) premiums for work: at night, on a weeklyrest day and overtime; (iii) whether there arerestrictions on work at night, work on a weekly restday and for overtime work; (iv) whethernonpregnant and nonnursing women can worksame night hours as men; (v) length of paid annualleave.
Working hours
(i) whether redundancy can be basis for terminatingworkers; (ii) whether employer needs to notifyand/or get approval from third party to terminate 1redundant worker and a group of 9 redundantworkers; (iii) whether law requires employer toreassign or retrain a worker before making workerredundant; (iv) whether priority rules apply forredundancies and reemployment.
Redundancy rules
(i) notice period for redundancy dismissal; (ii)severance payments due when terminating aredundant worker.
Redundancy cost
(i) whether law mandates equal remuneration forwork of equal value and nondiscrimination based ongender in hiring; (ii) whether law mandates paid orunpaid maternity leave; (iii) length of paid maternityleave; (iv) whether employees on maternity leavereceive 100% of wages; (v) availability of five fullypaid days of sick leave a year; (vi) eligibilityrequirements for unemployment protection.
Job quality
Case study assumptions
To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions about theworker and the business are used.
- Is a cashier in a supermarket or grocery store, age 19, with one year of workexperience.- Is a full-time employee.- Is not a member of the labor union, unless membership is mandatory.
The worker:
- Is a limited liability company (or the equivalent in the economy).- Operates a supermarket or grocery store in the economy’s largest business city.For 11 economies the data are also collected for the second largest business city.- Has 60 employees.- Is subject to collective bargaining agreements if such agreements cover more than50% of the food retail sector and they apply even to firms that are not party to them.- Abides by every law and regulation but does not grant workers more benefits thanthose mandated by law, regulation or (if applicable) collective bargainingagreements.
The business:
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 52
Labor Market Regulation - Estonia
Details – Labor Market Regulation in Estonia
Answer
Hiring
Fixed-term contracts prohibited for permanent tasks? Yes
Maximum length of a single fixed-term contract (months) 60.0
Maximum length of fixed-term contracts, including renewals (months) 120.0
Minimum wage applicable to the worker assumed in the case study (US$/month) 530.7
Ratio of minimum wage to value added per worker 0.2
Maximum length of probationary period (months) 4.0
Working hours
Standard workday 8.0
Maximum number of working days per week 5.0
Premium for night work (% of hourly pay) 25.0
Premium for work on weekly rest day (% of hourly pay) 0.0
Premium for overtime work (% of hourly pay) 50.0
Restrictions on night work? Yes
Whether nonpregnant and nonnursing women can work the same night hours as men Yes
Restrictions on weekly holiday? No
Restrictions on overtime work? No
Paid annual leave for a worker with 1 year of tenure (working days) 24.0
Paid annual leave for a worker with 5 years of tenure (working days) 24.0
Paid annual leave for a worker with 10 years of tenure (working days) 24.0
Paid annual leave (average for workers with 1, 5 and 10 years of tenure, in working days) 24.0
Redundancy rules
Dismissal due to redundancy allowed by law? Yes
Third-party notification if one worker is dismissed? No
Third-party approval if one worker is dismissed? No
Third-party notification if nine workers are dismissed? No
Third-party approval if nine workers are dismissed? No
Retraining or reassignment obligation before redundancy? Yes
Priority rules for redundancies? Yes
Priority rules for reemployment? No
Redundancy cost
Notice period for redundancy dismissal for a worker with 1 year of tenure 4.3
Notice period for redundancy dismissal for a worker with 5 years of tenure 8.6
Notice period for redundancy dismissal for a worker with 10 years of tenure 12.9
Notice period for redundancy dismissal (average for workers with 1, 5 and 10 years of tenure) 8.6
Severance pay for redundancy dismissal for a worker with 1 year of tenure 4.3
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 53
Severance pay for redundancy dismissal for a worker with 5 years of tenure 4.3
Severance pay for redundancy dismissal for a worker with 10 years of tenure 4.3
Severance pay for redundancy dismissal (average for workers with 1, 5 and 10 years of tenure) 4.3
Job quality
Equal remuneration for work of equal value? Yes
Gender nondiscrimination in hiring? Yes
Paid or unpaid maternity leave mandated by law? Yes
Minimum length of maternity leave (calendar days)? 140.0
Receive 100% of wages on maternity leave? Yes
Five fully paid days of sick leave a year? No
Unemployment protection after one year of employment? Yes
Minimum contribution period for unemployment protection (months)? 12.0
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 54
Business Reforms in Estonia
In the past year, observed a peaking of reform activity worldwide. From June 2, 2017, to May 1, 2018, 128 economiesimplemented a record 314 regulatory reforms improving the business climate. Reforms inspired by have been implementedby economies in all regions. The following are reforms implemented since 2008.
Doing BusinessDoing Business
Doing Business
= reform making it easier to do business. = Change making it more difficult to do business.Doing Business
DB2016
Starting a Business: Estonia made starting a business simpler by allowing minimum capital to be deposited at the time of companyregistration.
DB2014
Enforcing Contracts: Estonia made enforcing contracts easier by lowering court fees.
DB2012
Paying Taxes: In Estonia a municipal sales tax introduced in Tallinn made paying taxes costlier for firms, though a later parliamentarymeasure abolished local sales taxes effective January 1, 2012.
DB2011
Dealing with Construction Permits: Estonia made dealing with construction permits more complex by increasing the time for obtainingdesign criteria from the municipality.
Getting Credit: Estonia improved access to credit by amending the Code of Enforcement Procedure and allowing out-of-court enforcementof collateral by secured creditors.
Paying Taxes: Estonia increased the unemployment insurance contribution rate.
Resolving Insolvency: Amendments to Estonia’s recent insolvency law increased the chances that viable businesses will survive insolvencyby improving procedures and changing the qualification requirements for insolvency administrators.
Labor Market Regulation: Estonia eliminated the applicable priority rules for dismissals as well as the obligation to notify and obtain theapproval of a third party in case of redundancy dismissals. It also removed restrictions on night work and reduced notice period andseverance payment applicable in case of redundancy dismissals.
DB2010
Registering Property: Estonia made registering property easier by computerizing property records at the land registry and therebyenabling notaries to carry out the process online.
Resolving Insolvency: Estonia enhanced its insolvency process by establishing a new reorganization procedure to enable financiallydistressed companies to restructure their debt and apply other means to restore financial health and profitability.
DB2008
Starting a Business: Estonia made starting a business easier and less costly by introducing standard articles of association and a fixed feeschedule for company registration.
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 55
EstoniaDoing Business 2019
Page 56