World Bank Document · GIS Geo Graphic Information System GOI Government of India GOMP Government...

MADHYA PRADESH WATER SECTOR RESTRUCTURING PROJECT[MPWSRPJ

WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENTGOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH

SEMF ReportE888Vol. 3

N

STUDY BASIN BOUNDARY SINDH,. W+Ez DISTRICT BOUNDARY

TONS sD )~BETWAI

CHAMBAL 00K0E100N 200 KEl'APRILURI 2

GAR (ID SG A k m N N A N

L S SOUTH AAS A PVT LTDC gs ARDA--$ SEONI>-T- NIMR HIDWARX58e N LAT - NUIM BEU LAGHA =

100 0 100 200 KPometers

APRIL 2004

LEA ASSOCIATES SOUTH ASIA PVT LTD e tNEW DELHI !

FILE COPY

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABBREVIATIONS - SEMF ............................................ I

1. INTRODUCTION .................................................... 1-11.1 OVERVIEW OF MPWSRP & ESA ........................................ 1-11.2 DEFINITION OF SEMF ................................................ 1-31.3 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES ............................................ 1-21.4 ROLE OF NGOS IN THE PROJECT ...................................... 1-41.5 SCHEME APPRAISAL PROCESS ........................................ 1-51.6 PRIORITY TASK - AWARENESS RAISING CAMPAIGN ........................ 1-5

2. STAGE 1 - PRE-PLANNING ............................................ 2-12.1 SEMF ACTIVITIES .................................................. 2-12.2 OUTCOMES OF STAGE 1: ............................................. 2-12.3 SCREENING FOR SUBPROJECT ATTRIBUTES ............................. 2-22.4 SCREENING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES AND SAFEGUARD MEASURES

I ..................................................................................................................... I ......................... 2-52.5 MONITORING INDICATORS ........................................... 2-7

3. STAGE 2 - PLANNING & DESIGN ....................................... 3-13.1 SEMF ACTIVITIES .................................................. 3-13.2 IMPACT ASSESSMENT MATRIX - IAM .................................... 3-23.3 SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK - SEMF ............... 3-23.4 CHECK LIST FOR APPRAISAL OF DRAFT SUB-PROJECT PLAN ................ 3-33.5 MONITORING OF INDICATORS ......................................... 3-3

4. STAGE 3 - IMPLEMENTATION ......................................... 4-14.1 SEMF ACTIVITIES .................................................. 4-14.2 CONTRACT CLAUSES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS ......... 4-2

5. STAGE 4 - POST IMPLEMENTATION .................................... 5-15.1 SEMF ACTIVITIES ................................................... 5-15.2 MONITORING INDICATORS ........................................... 5-1

6. TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK .................................. 6-16.1 PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ................. 6-16.2 DISPLACEMENT OF TRIBALS .......................................... 6-26.3 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ...................................... 6-36.4 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY ......................................... 6-3

7. GENDER ACTION FRAMEWORK ....................................... 7-17.1 PROCEDURE FOR PREPARATION OF GENDER ACTION PLAN ................. 7-1

7.2 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .................................. 7-27.3 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY .................................... 7-2

8. RESETTLEMENT FRAMEWORK ........................................ 8-18.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................... 8-18.2 POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF SUB-PROJECTS ................................ 8-18.3 RATIONALE FOR RESETTLEMENT FRAMEWORK ........................... 8-28.4 DEFINITIONS USED IN THE MPWSRP R&R POLICY FRAMEWORK .............. 8-28.5 BROAD PRINCIPLES & OBJECTIVES OF R&R FRAMEWORK ................... 8-38.6 ENTITLEMENT FRAMEWORK: ......................................... 8-58.7 PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING RESETTLEMENT PLAN ..................... 8-108.8 ADDITIONAL DETAILS RELATED TO RESETTLEMENT PLAN .................. 8-138.9 ORGANIZATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR RAP IMPLEMENTATION ............... 8-15

9. PEST MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................... 9-19.1 PROCEDURES FOR PREPARATION OF IPM ............................... 9-19.2 1PM & INM TRAINING COSTS .......................................... 9-3

10. CULTURAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ................................. 10-110.1 PROCEDURES FOR CULTURAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT .................. 10-1

11. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION ........................................ 11-1

12. DAM SAFETY ..................................................... 12-112.2 RELIEF WELLS ................................................... 12-1012.3 ACCESS ROADS .................................................. 12-13

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1: Water Resources Management - Institutions and InstrumentsTable 1.2 Component B: Institutional Reform - Irrigation and DrainageTable 6.1: Activities and Indicators for inclusion of Tribal issuesTable 6.2: Impact Indicators for evaluationTable 6.3: Institutional Arrangements for Tribal group involvementTable 7.1: Activities & Indicators for inclusion of Gender IssuesTable 7.2: Impact Indicators of Post Implementation StageTable 7.3: Institutional arrangements for women's' involvementTable 8.1: Eligibility CriteriaTable 8.2: Summary Entitlement MatrixTable 8.3: Procedure & Indicators for ResettlementTable 8.4: Impact Indicators for evaluation of PAPsTable 9.1: Procedures & Indicators for IPM PlanTable 9.2: Costs of IPM & INM ProgramsTable 10.1: Procedures & Indicators for Cultural Property ManagementTable 12.1: Size ClassificationTable 12.2: Hazard Potential ClassificationTable 12.3: Stage wise operation Guidelines for Dam safety plan

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1: Framework for Physical Asset ImprovementFigure 1.2: Project Institutional ArrangementsFigure 1.3: Proposed Institutional Strengthening for the MPWSRP

ABBREVIATIONS - SEMF

AHD Animal Health Department

CAIT Computer Application and Information Technology

CBO Cast Based Occupation

CCA Culturable Command Area

CWC Central Water Commission

DC Distributory Committee

DMT's District Master Trainers

DPIP Drought Prone Integrated Programme

DPR Detailed Project Report

EA Environmental Assessment

ENV Environment

EPA Environment Protection Act

ESA Environmental and Social Assessment

FYM Farm Yard Manure

GDI Gender Development Index

GIS Geo Graphic Information System

GOI Government of India

GOMP Government of Madhya Pradesh

GW Ground Water

HA Hectare

HDI Human Development Index

HLC High Level Canal

HLC High Level Canal

HQ Head Quarter

HYV High Yielding Variety

I & D Irrigation and Drainage

Madhya Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project

IAS Indian Administrative Services

ICAR Indian Council of Agriculture Research

IGA Income Generation Activity

IMC Indian Major Carps

IPDT Indigenous People Development Plan

IPM Integrated Pest Management

IPNS Integrated Plant Nutrient Supply

ISI Indian Standard Institution

IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management

JFM Joint Forest Management

KM Kilometre

LBC Left Bank Canal

LLC Low Level Canal

LPG Liquid Petroleum Gas

LUN Laghu Udyog Nigam

M&E Monitoring and Evaluation

MCM Million Cubic Meter

MDT Multi-Disciplinary Teams

MFP Minor Forest Produce

MIP Minor Irrigation Project

MIS Management Information system

MP Madhya Pradesh

MPEB Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board

MPSEB Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board

MPWSRP Madhya Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project

NA Not Available

NGO Non-Government Organisation

Madhya Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project II

END xESA Tina(4po7M

NIH National Institute of Hydrology

NIRD National Institute of Rural Development

NPK Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium

NVDA Narmada Valley Development Authority

NVDD Narmada Valley Development Department

NWDT Narmada Water Dispute Tribunal

O&M Operation & Maintenance

OBC Other Backward Class

OTC Orientation Training Centre

PAF Project Affected Family

PAP Project Affected Persons

PC Project Committee

PESA Panchyats Extension to Scheduled Areas

PHED Public Health Engineering Department

PICU Project Implementation Coordination Unit

PIM Participatory Irrigation Management

PMGSY Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana

R&D Research and Development

R&R Rehabilitation & Resettlement

RAP Resettlement Action Plan

RBC Right Bank Canal

RL Reduced Level

R&R Policy Rehabilitation & Resettlement Policy

SC Scheduled Cast

SDO Sub Divisional Officer

SDU Social Development Unit

SEMF Social & Environmental Management Framework

Madhya Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project III

SHG Self Help Group

SPIG Scheme Productivity Improvement Group

SPOR State Policy on Rehabilitation 2002

ST Scheduled Tribe

SWaRA State Water Resources Agency

SWaRDAC State Water Resources Data and Analysis Centre

SWaTReC State Water Tariff Regulatory Committee

TC Territorial Committees

TOT Training of Trainers

TV Television

VRS Voluntary Retirement Scheme

WALMI Water and Land Management Institute

WRD Water Resources Department

WRDTC Water Resources Development Training Centre

WRM Water Resources Management

WUA Water User Association

Madhya Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project Iv

1. INTRODUCTION

The present Chapter gives an introduction to the Social and Environmental Management Framework. It providesthe context of this SEMF, its components, the manner in which these are to be implemented and the agenciesresponsible for implementation.

I OVERVIEW OF MPWSRP & ESA

1.1. 1 MPWSRP

The Madhya Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project (MPWSRP) plans a holistic developmentwith an integrated vision for water sector development and management and user participation inplanning and management to achieve a demand driven process. The strategy emphasises anenvironmentally and socially sustainable basin approach for water resources planning andmanagement, including conjunctive use of surface and ground water. Agricultural intensification anddiversification to be supported under this proposed intervention would contribute to creation of both on-farm & off-farm employment and create enabling environment for private sector participation. Thus theproject would contribute to poverty alleviation and environmentally sustainable growth.

The GOI National Water Policy and the draft Water Policy of Madhya Pradesh emphasize the need tobase water resources development in a river basin/sub-basin context. The Bank's strategy in thissector also follows the same principle. The proposed assistance to MP would be based on a holisticapproach to water resources management in each of the river basins/sub-basins of the State. All wateruses (irrigation, hydropower, domestic, industrial, fisheries, livestock, recreation) would be taken intoaccount. In the initial phase of the program, five basins/sub-basins located north of the Vindhya Rangenamely, Chambal, Sind, Betwa, Dasan-Ken and Tons have been selected in consultation with theWRD senior management based on (i) high incidence of poverty (the MP DPIP operates in these fivebasins); (ii) existence of ageing systems that need rehabilitation and modernization; (iii) presence ofdifferent types of water resources management challenges (major, medium, minor irrigation projects,small hydropower developments, fisheries, potential public private partnerships); and (iv) contiguity ofthe basins. River basin management entities would be developed in two basins together withnecessary decision support system development capabilities. It is envisaged that these entities wouldbe the basin level organizations performing similar tasks as the State Water Resources Agencyproposed at the State-level. Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) techniques would beimplemented in Sindh and Tons basins.

The project development objective is to improve productivity of water for the enhancement of sociallyand environmentally-sustainable growth and poverty reduction in selected focus basins (Chambal,Sindh, Betwa, Ken and Tons) of Madhya Pradesh. The proposed project components provide supportfor institutional reforms in water resources management as well as for irrigation service deliveryand complementary investments in improving and modernizing physical assets as describedbelow:

Component A: Water Resources Management - Institutions and Instruments

Madhya Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project 1-

This component would support the establishment and operationalization of the proposed planning,allocation and regulatory institutions and instruments at the State and basin-levels. This would bedone through the proposed State Water Resources Agency, the associated State WaterResources Data and Analysis Center, a State Water Tariff/Rights Regulatory Commission, andBasin Development and Management Boards for the Sindh and Tons.

Component B: Service Delivery - Irrigation and Drainage Institutions

This component would support measures related to delivering reliable irrigation services atreasonable cost by financially self-sustaining entities. This includes irrigation line agencystrengthening through technical and management assistance, including the development of acomprehensive information management system, training, and equipment. Options for promotingdecentralized management of irrigation and drainage schemes through strengthening of WUAsand increased public-private partnerships.

Component C: Improving productivity of selected existing irrigation and drainage assets infive basins

This component would operationalize the concepts and provide the necessary investments in fivebasins (Chambal, Sindh, Betwa, Ken and Tons) to modernize existing irrigation schemes throughrehabilitation, provision of appropriate extension for agriculture, horticulture, livestockmanagement and fisheries and WUA strengthening.

Component D. Project Management Support

A multi-disciplinary Project Activities Coordination Unit (PICU) would coordinate the project activities.Support would be provided to assist the PICU with its role in facilitating and guiding the implementationand monitoring of all project activities, ensuring synergy and coordination amongst activities andagencies implementing these activities, preparing consolidated reports and facilitating training. PICUwould be responsible for baseline surveys and environmental, social and other assessments startingfrom project preparation period and update of such information throughout project implementation andbe responsible for project monitoring and evaluation in addition to direct implementing agencies fortechnical, social, institutional and economic issues.

The Project is a multi-level hierarchical programme, which attempts to address the existing deficienciesthrough a mix of institutional reforms and rehabilitation of physical assets. Overall institutional relatedenvironmental and social aspects have been dealt in the ESA report whereas Component (C):Improving productivity of selected existing irrigation and drainage assets in five basins, towhich the SEMF applicable has been dealt in this report. The activities under this component, thataccounts for most of the project costs, consist of the following:

* Asset Modernisation through rehabilitation of selected irrigation & drainage schemes with participatorysystem design, volumetric delivery of water to Water User Associations and real time monitoring &management of systems;

* Agricultural Intensification and Diversification including Horticulture and Livestock Improvement; and

* Development of Fisheries.

This SEMF is not final but it is developed based on survey findings of 20 sample schemes. This SEMFwill be applied on all the schemes to taken up in MPWSRP through processes laid down in thedocument. The SEMF will be further modified based on the lessons learnt from the first year schemes.

Madhya Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project 1-2

1.1.2 ESA Study

As a part of the main project, an ESA study was undertaken to provide inputs into the MPWSRP inaccordance with the World Bank Operational Guidelines, through identification of key environmentaland social issues related to the project and devise opportunities to enhance the benefits and mitigatepotential concems. The integration of such issues within the project planning and implementationprocesses is to help minimize post design mitigation measures. The SEMF is the outcome of thisstudy and has to be applied to all the proposed sub-project activities through various stages of theentire project cycle. Broad objectives of these stages are as follows:

* Pre-Planning Stage: Building up Environmental and Social Knowledge Base and inclusion of Initial BroadStakeholder views,

* Planning and Design Stage: Plan effective and sustainable activities in a participatory manner that istechnically, socially, environmentally and economically sound and agree on an Memorandum ofUnderstanding with all key stakeholders,

* Implementation Stage: Implement activities and build capacity within the Stakeholders Departments andWater User Associations, and

* Post Implementation Stage: Withdraw gradually by building sustainability into the sub-project.

Tables 1.1 & 1.2 present the Environmental & Social concems, opportunities, mitigation measures andmonitoring indicators for Components A and B of the project respectively. The present SEMF pertainsto the incorporation of environmental and social mitigation and enhancement measures for sub projectactivities of Component C of the MPWSRP only. Fig 1.1 presents the project cycle for Component C(Physical Asset Improvement) and the SEMF activities to be undertaken.

12 DEFINITION OF SEMF

An SEMF is a road map to be followed by the Project Implementing Agency and their staff forincorporation of environmental and social management measures into the main project planning,execution and operation. It lays down a step-by-step methodology for activities that have to beundertaken parallel to the engineering and institutional intervention measures of the main project.

The SEMF contains relevant Formats and Checklists to be utilised for the abovementioned works. Italso contains Framework and Action Plans for various key issues like Dam Safety, Pest Management,Cultural Property Management, Resettlement & Rehabilitation, Tribal Issues, Gender Issues andCommunity Sensitisation that need to be addressed.


Table 1-1: Water Resources Management - Institutions and Instruments

Activity Existing / Opportunities Mitigation/Enhancement MonitoringPotential Measures / IndicatorsConcerns Implementing Agency

State Water Low level capacity to Mainstream environmental and Major effort at building ImprovedResource understand and social issues in Basin environmental capacity at knowledgeAgency & integrate Planning and Management SWaRA for river basin baseBasin Agency environmental and Improve environmental planning, allocation and ImprovedFunctioning social issues related knowledge-base, analytical regulation (WRD) access to

to basin planning tools and institutional linkages Development of a significant knowledgeLack of environmental for environmentally and environmental knowledge- baseknowledge-base socially-sustainable integrated base and analytical capacity Change incapacity and water resources management on the State and especially basin levelanalytical tools in a basin framework on the selected basin at the planning

Lack of planning in (including wetlands SWaRDAC to support the Change inbasin development management, conjunctive consideration of awarenessconsidering groundwater-surface water environmental issues at level ofenvironmental issues management, in-stream flow SWaRA and SwaTReC stakeholdersuch as water logging, allocation and enforcement for (WRD)salinisation, resource environmental and other Data-sharing, institutionalconflicts, stakeholder purposes, water quality mechanisms built-in for inter-consultation and management, appropriate agency coordination (WRD)participation, flooding, environmental and social A Strategic Basin Environmentenvironmental assessment framework for & Social Assessment toallocation, etc. projects impacting water inform Basin planning,

Lack of coordination resources availability and develop knowledge-base,amongst WRD & line quality, etc.) build capacity and generatedepartments and Improve multi-stakeholder ownership (WRD)between line awareness and encourage Provision for identified anddepartments and inter-agency cooperation and unidentified Special Studieswater users in sharing coordination on environmental and access to environmentalinformation and and social issues expertise (WRD)proper coordination of Promotion of Environmentalactivities awareness, communication,

etc. (e.g. through website,State of Water EnvironmentReport, multi-media events,etc.) (WRD)

Encourage extensiveenvironmental trainingactivities within and outsidethe Apex Institutions (WRD)

Develop environmental andnatural resource database forthe state and basins (WRD)

Pilot various types ofenvironmental analysis andmodelling, (WRD)

Training and Awareness-building (WRD)

Tariff Reform/ Low water rates Improved fiscal/financial Develop environmental and Change inWater Rights causing scarcity of position of department social principles and water tariffAdministration funds for O&M Clear water rights leading to guidelines in setting water Establishment

Affordability of farmers improved water management, tariffs (SWATREC/SWARA) of waterClarity on water rights and optimal water use Extensive consultation before rightsand lead time to finalizing water rates and frameworkdevelop adequate water rights Change ininformation base (SWATREC/SWARA/WRD) revenue

Compensatory collectionmeasures/development of Change insocial safety nets before O&Mtransferring bulk water fromone sub sector to the otherbased on sound economic


Activity Existing / Opportunities Mitigation/Enhancement MonitoringPotential Measures / IndicatorsConcerns Implementing Agency

principles(SWATREC/SWARA/WRD)

Coordinate consultation onenvironmental and socialaspects and revenuecollection with WUAs(SWATREC/SWARA/WRD)

Rewards for productive use ofwater and disincentives forwasting water(SWATREC/SWARA/WRD)

Encourage the trading ofwater to higher economicapplications to minimizeresource utilisation, servicedelivery costs and operationand maintenance(SWATREC/SWARA)

Training and Awareness-building(SWATREC/SWARA/WRD)

Basin Board Lack of focal point for Provision of focal point to Develop and implement BasinStrengthening stakeholders to address multi-sectoral issues simple and effective Board/Sub-(Sindh and discuss in a basin context environmental guidelines for basinTons Basins) environmental, social Development and use of an WRD activities for basin commitee

and water issues adequate environmental and development (SWARA/Basin meetingsrelating to a basin and social knowledge base Boards) andinteract with other Develop Environmental participationdecision-makers knowledge base and Change in

Poor capacity at appropriate modern analytical basinMPWRD to address tools to facilitate informed planningenvironmental & decision-making at various approachsocial issues; also levels in irrigated agriculture No of trainingpoor partnerships activities from MPWRD to and

Existing environmental farmer level (SWARA/Basin workshopsknowledge base, Boards) to WUAsanalytical capacity Guide the mainstreaming of and Staffand environmental environmental issues in theawareness in implementation of the pilotMPWRD and among reform activities in the basinfarmers is weak (SWARA/Basin Boards)

Inter-agency Training and Awareness-information sharing is building (SWARA/Basinweak Boards)

Development of a significantenvironmental knowledge-base and analytical capacity(SWARA/Basin Boards)

Promotion of Environmentalawareness, communication,etc. (e.g. through meetings,website, State of WaterEnvironment Report, multi-media events, etc.)(SWARA/Basin Boards)


Table 1-2 Component B: Institutional Reform - Irrigation and DrainageActivity Existing / Opportunities Recommended Monitoring

Potential Mitigation/Enhancement IndicatorConcerns Measures /

Implementing AgencyTraining & Inadequate Improvement of Develop detailed training plan No. of trainings toCapacity training and staff skills, to identify target staff/ WUAs, staff and WUAsBuilding professional skills-mix and training opportunities Participants in

development capacity (courses, awareness visits, trainingopportunities for Awareness of national and international Survey feedbackWRD staff and new options for study tours, etc.) and trainingWUAs improving institutions/experts to

Inadequate irrigation service improve the understanding ofaccess to delivery and use addressing social andexpertise Reduced environmental issues in

Lack of wastage of irrigation and drainageawareness of the resources activities. (PICU/individualfull range of Improved self- project departments)management image Depute training coordinatoroptions and Improved and evolve training strategymodern ways of sensitization to to match staff/WUAs anddoing business under- their training needs with

Inadequate emphasized training opportunitiesdissemination of issues such as (PICU/individual projectthe new laws and dealing with departments)policies gender, tribal, Promote memberships in

Lack of knowledge resource professional organizations inof new conservation, key environmental and socialtechnologies cropping areas (e.g. for participatory

Lack of agriculture patterns, irrigation management,extension environmental integrated water resourcesactivities flows, wetland management, non-point

Lack of good management, source pollutiontargeting of staff and other management, integrated pestand WUAs for issues management, etc.)training Strengthening (PICU/individual project

the dialogue, departments)exchange andexploration ofideas betweengenderspecialists,social scientistsand economistswithingovernmentsand otherexperts andagencies

Strengthening ofWUAs toimprove PIM

Information Poor knowledge Improve reliable Develop a high-quality Change inManagemenVMIS base on and effective spatially-referenced database feedback

environmental management of environmental and social processand social information parameters for MP in general Level ofaspects of system for two and the project focus basins awarenessirrigation way information and schemes in particular to amongschemes Improve role of promote environmentally and stakeholders

No reliable feed media for socially sustainable irrigation Level ofback system on awareness service delivery. participatoryperformance of building Develop effective information approach inimplemented management system for basin planning


Activity Existing / Opportunities Recommended MonitoringPotential Mitigation/Enhancement IndicatorConcerns Measures /

Implementing Agencyschemes WRD and link to decision- and

Poor access to support (WRD) implemntation ofimportant Develop adequate information MPWSRPinformation on sharing arrangements withenvironmental other agencies (WRD,and social Agriculture dept, horticultureaspects to a wide dept, veterinary servicesrange of dept, fisheries dept, etc.)stakeholders Develop awareness

Poor use of programmes, publications,environmental websites, etc. to helpand social disseminate relevantinformation information, benchmarking,indecisions and state of the basin reports

Lack of based on these data (WRD)coordination in Develop consultation processline departments to collate, use, update,regarding sharing disseminate and use theof information information (WRD)

Develop transparency in theplanning, designing andimplementation (WRD)

Irrigation Manual Inadequate Re-design of Develop contract clauses Inclusion ofRevision provisions to manual as per related to environmental environmental

address issues present issues (WRD) and social issuesrelated to basin requirement Enhance powers to modify into irrigationplanning design as per site manual and

No provisions for requirement (WRD) associatedaddressing social Develop operation and businessand maintenance guidelines processesenvironmental (WRD)issues Include role of WUA, their

Lack of flexibility responsibility andin implementation accountability (WRD)

No provision for Develop MoUs for consultancyparticipatory services, WUA's, NGO's andirrigation Public- Private partnershipmanagement and (WRD)public- privatepartnership

Lack for operationand maintenanceguidelines

Fallibility in designas per siterequirement

Inadequateprovision ofdrainage incommand area

Voluntary Re-entry of staff Reduce fiscal Develop a transparent No. of employeesRetirement into Government burden of state communication plan would be who opt for VRSSchemes Social tension and and financial developed to provide Training/retraining

loss of face as a burden on adequate information to programs heldresult of job loss department employees in targeted posts Set up and

Not Improve morale to describe all aspects of the performance ofinvesting/spendin in workplace of proposed VRS (WRD) VRS panelg VRS benefits targeted surplus Target selected posts in WRD Development ofwisely posts to reduce chance of good detailed VRS

Non-availability of Provide access employees not targeted implementation


Activity Existing I Opportunities Recommended MonitoringPotential Mitigation/Enhancement Indicator

Concerns Measures /Implementing Agency

employment to training and leaving (WRD). planopportunities potentially Ensure staff do not re-enteroutside WRD beneficial through age cut-offs for VRS

Loss of best staff opportunities to eligibility, maintenance ofthrough VRS currently adequate personnel roster,

Inadequate safety underutilized or inclusion of appropriatenets for staff unproductive clauses in contracts andopting for VRS staff in WRD awareness programs.

Perception of least who opt for VRS Develop an adequateproductive staff Create fiscal attractive financial package totargeted for extra space for attract targeted staff to thecompensation deployment of VRS (PICU/WRD)through VRS much-needed Develop adequate safety nets

new skills and in VRS implementation,investment in including training/retrainingother programs, provision ofactivities/sector investment advice,s advice/facilitation for

Generate alternative employment andlessons to post retirement supportimprove VRS (PICU/WRD)policies Explore potential to create

Possibilities to employee companies withemploy retired initially guaranteed workemployees on programs to work with WRDshort-term (PICU/WRD).temporary basis Ensure Adequate Consultationon remunerative & Counseling measureswork in NGOs within the department (WRD)and Setup Panel with WRDConsultancy management and employeeFirms representation to monitor

Improve VRS implementation andhandover to address grievancesWUAs without (PICU/WRD)parallel and Engage consultant to developunclear detailed VRS implementationresponsibility planwith WRD staff

Improve benefitsofmodernizationof WRD


Responsible Stage Activity Output IndicatorsAgency *Spatial locations, Salient features

it, U -t- = of Projects, c Identify Key Stakeholders *Key Environmental & SocialNGOs, Cu Preliminary Consultations Issues

Other -- *Relevant stakeholders & level of

Agencies SCREENINGOFPROJECTS | PROJECT INTERVENTIONS____ IDENTIFIED

*Spatial Distribution of IssuesJoint Walkthroughs *Impact Assessment

*Analysis of Alternatives(Structural / Non Structural)

C D A IO IMPACT CATEGORIZATIONDRAFT MITIGATION &inmiranUfl~Smue rupraen ENHANCEMENT MEASURES

C __- *Meetings (Number, Attendance,E WRD, and minutes)a NGOs, 06 *Appraisal Comments Reflected in° Other Line . *c Plan and Estimate

Agencies *EnvironmentalE- Agencies *EconomicFINAL MITIGATION &

a FINAL SAFEGAURD MEASURES ENHANCEMENT MEASURES

-- =d g PLAN ACCEPTANCE

*MOU developed and signedO - - with plan, estimates, schedule_ Understanding (WUA, WRD, Other Line Agencies)

.. ICONTRACT CLAUSES SAFEGUARD CLAUSES IN MAINS | CCONTRACTo WRD, m *Procurement documents contracts4-- 0NGOs, AwardiCnt awarded & equipment procuredsco *Fund FlowL.WUAs,o Other Line c r

13 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES

Since the project is being implemented through the Water Resources Department, it is the primeresponsible agency for implementing the recommendations and procedures laid down in the SEMF.The sub project officials with the help of Multi-Disciplinary Teams are responsible for complying withthe procedures of the SEMF throughout the project cycle.

Identification of physical interventions shall be carried out by the Scheme ProductivityImprovement Group (SPIG), which shall consist of the following WRD officials in charge of thesub-project:

* WRD Division Head (Executive Engineer),

Relevant Sub-Divisional Officers (AEs),

Relevant Sub-Engineer and Field staffs like Amin, Timekeepers, etc.

NGOs recruited to work with each Division

Nodal Officers (extension workers and supervisors) of various departments (Agriculture, Fisheries,Horticulture and Animal Husbandry and Veterinary)

Water Users Associations (WUA) members, Self Help Group (SHG members) and Project Committee (PC)and Distributory Committee (DC) members, and

The above team shall be supervised by the Project Implementation Coordination Unit (PICU) at theState level consisting of experts in various disciplines. The institutional arrangements forimplementation of the project and the associated strengthened expertise (in the form ofexperts/consultants in various critical areas that are currently under-represented) are shown in thefollowing figures. The responsibilities of the various institutional entities involved are shown in thesubsequent Table 1.1.


1U! S£VSWF :ina(47pof

State-Level Project Implementation 14S Coordination Unit (PICU)

Water Resources II%5 Uep~irrne(D)~ 1 Associated Departments

Agriculture Department*Horticulture Department

CE CE ( CE \ CE . Animal Husbandry DepartmentChief Engineer Cha S \etwa \ e&* Fisheries Department

Level

Scheme Productiv Imprdv,menY&r4p (SPiG) at each Division | 1

:Executive Engineer L E ( N.O.i (Division) Level EE IN!-------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------.1i----R----------------------i

- ----------..

Water UserAssociation Level WA WA -

...............................

Farmer Level Frer/ Fm Farmer/

Figure 1-2: Project Institutional Arrangements

Additional Expert Input PlannedPart-time Experts at PICU for:

Project Implementation * Agriculture GenderStCorinaioLUntvPlCU) Horticulture Environmental MgmtCoordination Unit (PICU Livestock Mgmt. Hydrology

* Fisheries * Advanced DesignsSocialI Development ' Agricultural Economist

17 % Monitoring & Evaluation

Part-time Experts at each CE for:

CE CE > CE CE Agr. Intensificaton & DiversificationChief Engineer Chambal Sindh Betwa en&Ton -Social Development

Level .Agr. Economist (incl. M&E)L , * Advanced Designs,-- -- -- -- - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---

.. ,Scherne Productivity Improvement Group (SPIG) at each Division I

*Executive Engineer - I j I I Deputed Staff for Agr. Intensification & Diversificatlorn(Division) Level EE-1 EE-2 L EE-3 1 NGO(community mobilization and facilitation)

I- - - - - -- - -'Zf-------------------------J.~a.

Water UserAssociation Level WUU

-------------------------FamrLvl Farmer/ Farmer/ F rmerlFarmer Level Other Water User Other Water User OtheraWater User

Figure 1-3: Proposed Institutional Strengthening for the MPWSRP


1NAMUL S£E9 (Finaf (porn

Table 1-3: Responsibilities of different entities at each stage of implementation process

Activity- Pre-Planning Planning Impl6mentation Post-Entity Impl6mentation

PICU Providing Guidelines and Providing data from GIS and Assistance and back up Help with documentingbackup support and other sources to SPIGs for support in helping SPIGs good practice examples asoversight to SPIGs ( field undertaking effective develop effective, scheme well as lessons leamt andunits). planning. productivity improvement their disseminationAssistance in contracting of Participate in some of the plans. between SPIGS.NGOs for social initial SEMF application Assistance in enabling Facilitating exposure visitsmobilization and facilitation exercises in each division to linkages with resource of SPIGS and WUAof SEMF applicaton. help build capacity. support organizations for representatives to goodHelping coordination of Capacity building of SPIGs in enhancing agriculture, AH, practice examples.Agri, Horticulture, AH, and in SEMF application and fisheries, horticulture basedFisheries dept.s with the effective project productivity and income.WRD at district level implementation.through requestingappropriate support fromState and District levels.

SPIG Create a database of Plan for SEMF application Proiect implementation with Carry out implementationschemes to be taken up for and identification of the active involvement of completion reports (ICRs)modernization along with all modernization requirements concerned line and learn from thisrelated data on of irrigation system with the departments and the WUA experience forsocioeconomic, active involvement of WUAs members. implementation of other

and facilitation by NGOs Identification of key schemes.through attending appropriate environmental and social Undertake regularcapacity building programs concerns. monitoring of worksorganized by PICU and other completed to assessagencies. impacts with the

involvement of the WUAsand the other lineagencies.

NGOs Facilitate partnerships Undertake community Assist WUAs & WRD to Help document experiencebetween SPIGs and WUAs mobilization at WUA level implement SEMF, including of implementing systemalong with involvement of with the involvement of all helping vulnerable groups modernization andother relevant line agencies sections of the community to access project benefits productivity improvementfor effective project including vulnerable sections Assist WUAs in activities as well asimplementation through and to help SPIG team and undertaking system monitor the impact ofconducting workshops and line agency representatives modemization in these activities towardsopportunities for interaction undertake planning for system partnership with SPIG and enhancing learning of allat the WUA level. modernization., to include agriculture, stakeholders.

horticulture, animalhusbandry and fisheriesproductivity improvementwith active involvement ofcommunity.

WUA Ensure that all members of Coordinate the involvement of Implement provisions of To undertake managementthe WUA are actively all WUA members along with SEMF, including helping of modernized systeminvolved in the planning and SPIG and line agencies for vulnerable groups to towards enhancingidentification of modernization and access project benefits productivity and monitoringmodernization activities. productivity improvement Implement system the impacts thereof.

activities. modernization andproductivity improvementactivities in partnership withSPIG and line agencies.

1.4 ROLE OF NGOS IN THE PROJECT

The primary role of NGOs would be two fold:

* To assist the WUAs and the WRD to implement the provisions of the SEMF and


LI- SEM'' Thiafton

To assist with community mobilization with the involvement of all sections of the WUA and to facilitate WUApartnership with SPIG and other line agencies for system modernization and agriculture, fisheries, animalhusbandry and horticulture productivity enhancement.

NGOs would be contracted -by the Basin Chief Engineers with the active involvement of the concernedExecutive Engineers in the selection process using Terms of Reference that clearly outline theexpected facilitation role of these NGOs. Criteria for selection of NGOs would include their ability towork effectively both with village communities and with the Water Resources department and other lineagencies towards building partnerships that helps communities enhance productivity of water, enablevulnerable groups (including landless, tribal, women, etc.) to access the project benefits and ability tofacilitate partnership between WUAs and WRD engineers.

Selected NGOs would also be expected to help with a river basin/sub-basin approach to integratedwater resource management with due attention to involvement of all stakeholders/users of water in thebasin/sub-basin. The ability of NGOs to effectively link up with other agencies such as those involvedwith credit provision, marketing of agriculture, horticulture produce including banks and private sectoragencies would be an important criterion.

The ability of NGOs to act as facilitators that are prepared to recede to the background by enhancingcapacity of WUAs to work as equal partners with the Water Resources Department and other lineagencies as well as private sector partners would be key. NGOs need to plan on an effective exitstrategy right from the beginning and be able to demonstrate the effectiveness of their having beeninvolved in each and every community mobilization, facilitation and networking activity assigned tothem under the project.

1.5 SCHEME APPRAISAL PROCESS

The project also proposes to incorporate a rigorous appraisal process at PICU that will criticallyexamine the technical, environmental & social and economic & financial aspects of each schememodernization plan submitted by the SPIG. Appropriate consultancies, training, software, guidelinesand other tools will be prepared to facilitate the appraisal process. This appraisal process will includethe examination of the quality of application of the SEMF on the schemes/sub-projects and provideguidance to the SPIGs as necessary.

In addition to the above several tools shall be applied to ensure involvement and benefits accruing tovulnerable groups. These are Personal Interactions, Consultations, Joint Walkthrough, Training,Memorandum of Understanding, WUA executed works and income generation activities.


Scheme Appraisal ProcessI Consultations Joint Walkthroughs, Surveys Analysis, Expert Input

bmission of Integrated Scheme Modernization PlanAbm n and MOU to the PICU

1 ~Appraisal Focus Areas

Environment & Social Appraisal Technical Appraisal Economic & Financial Appraisal

Coensultaton & Ji Walithtroughs - Erng ieenng Design Detafled Costs

* Environmental & Social Mianagement Plan .Asset -ventory and asset statu,s Project Benefits (qiantitatwie & qual,tautve)

* Sift disposal. construction-related* Ottilsn,,g of problems & options assessment . Enalnahon of semphified beneflt-cost analysiswater ci.al,N, etc ) *Use of Surveys expert opition, consultations for each scheme

* Gender * Hydrologic. siltation water demand based on agr, F,md fow tnggers for releases* Tibal Decelopment hot and fisheries requirementts and other analysis WUA contribution

Resettlemlnent 1nocatine design based on consultation Monitoring & Learning Indicators & Baseline

'Dam Safety Constmction

* Pest Management *Draft Contracts. Specitications

* Cnitnral Property On*haty Control (OK Card)

* Nalural Habitats Supporting Investments

* Confict Management 'Agriculture, HonilnCULtre. Livestock management

Reflectioi of these aspects in Contracts, and fishenes detailed plaisMOU OK Card. Traimng Plan * Oceral acti,ty schedfting

* Monitorng & Learning Indicators & Basetline *Monitoring & Learntng Indicators & Baseline

Figure: Project Appraisal Process

116 PRIORITY TASK - AWARENESS RASING CAMPAIGN

For success of MPWSRP, an awareness campaign for dissemination of information of the project tothe potential beneficiaries will be needed. This process shall be carried out through the entire cycle ofthe project.

It will focus primarily on the broader objectives considering need of Social and Environmental issuesand scope of the MPWSRP, details of how the beneficiaries may participate in the sub project activitiesand the anticipated benefits. The awareness program will follow the details of the approved project andinclude what the project offers, the eligibility criteria and how the stakeholders can benefit from theproject. In this connection the following campaign for information dissemination is proposed, in additionto the key channels of communication with the farmers like NGOs, WUAs and other stakeholders.

Some specific media tools that will be utilized are listed in the following Table 1.4

Table 1-4: Media Tools for raising awareness

Tools Activity Who will be involved Co-ordinatorRADIO MPWSRP programs on Information, to Experts from Water Media

disseminate relevant messages through daily resources, Agriculture, Expert, PICU,Madhya Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project 1-14

L W S£E5K ThinarqZpoflbroadcasts on Radio Horticulture, Animal MPWSRP

Husbandry, Fisheries etc.TV PROGRAMS Weekly programmes on MPWSRP activities to Experts from Water Media

be telecast on TV resources, Agriculture, Expert, PICU,Horticulture, Animal MPWSRPHusbandry, Fisheries etc.

NUKKAD As Street play (NUKKAD NATAK) and Puppet WRD with the help of EE, WRD,NATAK/ DRAMA show are very popular in rural areas for NGOs and local cultural Media

information dissemination. The message of groups Expert, PICU,MPWSRP program can be prominently put MPWSRPforward in these programs on regular basis.

MOBILE VANS Provision of Mobile Vans with video films that WRD Mediadisplays proposed interventions of MPWSRP Expert, PICU,

MPWSRPPUBLICATIONS Leaflets, Booklets, posters and pamphlets can Water resources, Media

be published to disseminate the messages Agriculture, Horticulture, Expert, PICU,Animal Husbandry, MPWSRPFisheries etc.

ADVERTISE- Advertisements can also be published in Water resources, MediaMENTS newspapers especially on National and State Agriculture, Horticulture, Expert, PICU,

Daily on important occasions. Special articles Animal Husbandry, MPWSRPmay also be prepared and published in the Fisheries etc. /NGOsnewspapers

PERSONAL Personal interaction (e.g. through NGOs) for WRD/NGOs SocialINTERACTION social mobilization is the corner stone for the Expert, PICU,

various sub-project activities and for the MPWSRPSuccessful achievement of project objectives. Itis expected that boftom up planning processesfocusing on community initiatives will givegreater sense of participation and ownership toall. Farmer groups, who will then be betterdisposed to seeking benefits of the MPWSRP.


2. STAGE I - PRE-PLANNING

This Chapter describes the SEMF activities to be undertaken at the Pre Planning Stage, the Roles andResponsibilities and Outcome of this stage.

2.1 SEMF ACTIVITES

Sub-project Activities Who will be involved Co-ordinator

To arrange training and information dissemination WRD and other line EE, WRD with the helpmodules for Preliminary Sensitisation Sessions. department of Information

Management Cell

Assessment and Updating of Initial Knowledge WRD EE, WRD with the helpBase Data through GIS. of Information

Management Cell

Sensitisation of WRD sub-project staff and Sample WRD PR & Media Experts,Reconnaissance Surveys along with WUA PICU, WRD with EE,members and other line department officials, WRD

Identification of Key Stakeholders in the sub- WRD EE, WRDproject,

Preliminary Consultations with identified WRD and other line EE, WRDstakeholders through sensitisation of WUAs, departmentvillagers (including schedule tribe) and trans-human population regarding environment andsocial issues as found relevant to the sub-project,Include PRA Technologies for mapping andensuring interactive sessions.

Identification of civil works/ activities to increase WRD, WUAs and other EE, WRDwater productivity, line department

Collection of baseline engineering, environmental WRD and other line EE, WRDand social data with regard to the Screening departmentFormats -SC1 (for Sub-Project Prioritisation) andSC2 (for Application of Legislative Policies)

Prioritisation of projects through SCI and WRD and other line EE, WRDidentification of Legislative & WB Policies being departmenttriggered due to proposed project interventions.

Selection of Projects to be taken up for Planning WRD and other line EE, WRDand Design and finalising the procedures to ensure departmentcompliance with the triggered Legislative and WBPolicies.

2.2 OUTCOMES OF STAGE 1:

The Outcomes of this stage are:


-n M 0 SEW'Tnlfton1. Enhanced Awareness among the SPIG, WUAs and the villagers regarding SEMF resulting in active

participation and provide informed solutions.

2. Projects identified through screening and scoping, to be taken up in priority and the time and cost implicationsto comply with Legislative and Bank Policies being triggered by interventions in each sub-project.

2.3 SCREENING FOR SUBPROJECT ATTRIBUTES

Information to be collected for undertaking prioritisation of critical sub-project attributes and the

classification for rating of attributes are given below. Sub-project attributes with high scores shall betaken up for improvement as a priority due to high level of degradation and multiplicity of issues and

stakeholders.

Sub-project attributes Who will be involved Co-ordinator

3. Age of the Project: The age of the projects have been EE, WRD Informationclassified into four categories namely less than 10 years. 10 Managementto 30 years, 31 to 50 years and more than 50 years. Cell

4. Utilisation of Irrigation Potential Created: This EE, WRD Informationattribute indicates the efficiency of project in productive use of Managementwater. The utilisation of irrigation potential has been Cellcategorized into three categories, namelyl less than 40%,40% to 60%, and above 60% and worst performance hasbeen rated at the highest level.

5. Status of Dam and Appurtenances: Most of the EE, WRD ,Director, Damschemes earthen dams, which have degraded due to Safety Cell,deferred maintenance. The level of degradation has been MPWSRPclassified into three categories viz. severely degraded (3),moderately degraded (2) and minimum degradation (1).

6. Efficiency of Canal Water Delivery: The efficiency of EE, WRD Incharge CE,canal water delivery varies depending on various factors and WRDis indicated by lack of canal water delivery to the tail end,moderate to high canal conveyance losses, poor control overthe water flows in the canal etc. Accordingly the efficiency ofcanal water delivery has been classified into three categoriesnamely:

a - Moderately reliable canal water delivery with minimum to EE, WRD with the help of Incharge CEmoderate canal losses Information Management

Cell

b - Unreliable canal delivery with moderate canal losses with EE, WRD with the help of Incharge CEtail reach of the command area receiving minimum or nil Information Managementwater supply Cell

c - Unreliable water delivery with high canal losses with EE, WRD with the help of Incharge CEmiddle reaches minimum water supply and tail reaches out of Information Managementcommand area Cell

. Supplemental Irrigation through tubewells, tanks EE, WRD Inchargeand stop dams: In many of the projects the canal water CE,WRD


mSEWTTinafftol


supply has been augmented through linking village tanks,deep tube well or a stop dam linked with the existing canalsystem to augment the canal system. The results of suchaugmentation have been varied. This factor has to be takeninto consideration which screening the project. Threepossible scenarios have been considered viz., Minimumsupplementary irrigation (1) Supplemental irrigationarrangement exists but lack efficiency and effectiveness dueto poor desig- and maintenance (2), Extensive use oftubewells, ponds and stop dams (3).

Use of Project Facilities for Other Uses: The use of EE, WRD CE, WRD &project facilities like the reservoir, canal falls etc for other CE, BVPPuses like fisheries, urban/industrial water supply, andhydropower generation. This could be perennial or seasonaluse depending upon the availability of water. Any positiveimpacts on the availability of water due to appropriateinterventions would enhance the alternate uses of water.Consequently the water use around the year for different non-irrigation use has been given the highest rating.

* Catchment area degradation and reservoir EE, WRD,DFO, Forest Incharge CE,siltation: There are environmental problems like Catchment Dy. Director, Agriculture WRDarea degradation & siltation in the reservoir prevent and Soil Conservationenhancement of benefits of water use to the beneficiaries by officer if anyreducing the available reservoir storage. Any intervention inthe project rehabilitation would mitigate this adverseenvironmental situation. Thus project with seriousenvironmental problem need to be given higher priority.Three categories of situation have been considered forscreening namely Minor (1), Moderate (2) and Serious (3).

* Command area degradation through lack of EE, WRD Incharge CE,drainage system: Lack of drainage facilities lead to water WRD and SE,stagnation along the canals and if there is serious leakages Ayacutfrom the canals & canal structures then the problem getscompounded. The end impacts would be increase in thewater table levels and soil salinisation. Any proposedinterventions under MPWSRP has to take into considerationthe existing situation with regard to this problem and plan formitigation measures along with the implementation program.Consequently the screening process would consider threecategories of situations namely Minor (1), Moderate (2), andSerious (3).

* Deficiencies in Operation & Maintenance: The EE, WRD Incharge CE,deficiencies in the 0 & M of the irrigation & drainage schemes WRD and SE,have been categorized under three types namely minor, Ayacutmoderate and serious.


S£ENT (Fina(torl


* Weak Institutional Set up: There is a need to EE, WRDstrengthen the WRD, the other line agencies (e.g. agriculture,horticulture, animal husbandry, fisheries, etc.), and WUAs onvarious aspects of effective service delivery.

1 - Minor deficiency EE, WRD Incharge CE

* 2 - Moderate deficiency likely to deteriorate quickly if EE, WRD Incharge CEno mitigation action is not taken within next 5 to 7years

* 3 - Serious deficiency having adverse impacts on EE, WRD Incharge CEthe performance of the scheme and requiresimmediate mitigation measures

* Presence of Tribal Households: Benefits to tribal EE, WRD, Dy. Director, Districtpopulation from these irrigation projects are an important Tribal Welfare Collectorsocial objective. Their presence in the project area willnecessitate appropriate modifications in the projectinterventions. Giving this aspect due importance, higherpercentage of tribal cultivators has been accorded higherattribute rating. The category rating is based on thepercentage of tribal population to total population ofcommand area villages namely, (1) less than 10%, (2) 10 to15%, and (3) Above 15 %.

FORMAT SC1 - Screening for Sub-Project Attribute Prioritization

Sub-project attributes with high scores shall be taken up for improvement as a priority due to high levelof degradation and multiplicity of issues and stakeholders.

Project Name:

Sr.No. Sub-project Attribute Rating1 Age of the Project 1 - Less than 10 years

2 -11 to 30 years3 - 31 to 50 years4 - More than 50 years

2 Level of utilization of potential 1 - More than 60%created 2 - 40 to 60%

3 - Less than 40%3 Status of Dam and 1 - Minimum degradation & requires minimum repairs

appurtenances 2 - Degraded and serious seepage losses from the reservoir andrequires repairs in next 3 to 5 years3 - Severely degraded and requires immediate repairs and is a safetyhazard

4 Efficiency of canal water delivery 1 - Moderately reliable canal water delivery with minimum to moderatecanal losses2 - Unreliable canal delivery with moderate canal losses with tail reachof the command area receiving minimum or nil water supply


SEWF Fina(9port

Sr.No. Sub-project Attribute Rating3 - Unreliable water delivery with high canal losses with middlereaches minimum water supply and tail reaches out of command area

5 Supplemental irrigation through 1 - minimum supplementary irrigationtubewells, tanks, and stop dams 2 - Supplemental irrigation arrangement exists but lack efficiency and

effectiveness due to poor design and maintenance3 - Extensive use of tubewells, ponds and stop dams

6 Alternate use of water (Fisheries, 1 - Not at allmunicipal water supply etc) 2 - Moderate and seasonal use

3 - Extensive use round the year7 Catchment degradation and 1 - Minor Problem

reservoir siltation 2 - Moderate Problem3 - Serious Problem

8 Lack of drainage system, water 1 - Minor problemlogging, and rise in the ground 2 - Moderate and seasonal problemwater table 3 - Serious problem with continuous trend of deterioration in land

quality9 Deficiencies in the operation and 1 - Minor Deficiency

maintenance: Lack of hydraulic 2 - Moderate deficiency but likely to deteriorate quickly if no mitigativeand hydrological monitoring, action is not taken within next 3 to 5 yearsInadequate communication 3 - Serious deficiency having adverse impacts on the efficiency ofsystem, Lack of trained staff, scheme and requires immediate mitigative measuresinadequate funding

10 Weak Institutional set up: Weak 1 - Minor deficiencyand apathetic WUAs, Inadequate 2 - Moderate deficiency likely to deteriorate quickly if no mitigativeawareness among stakeholders, action is not taken within next 5 to 7 yearsLack of participation of women in 3 - Serious deficiency having adverse impacts on the performance ofdecision making process at the scheme and requires immediate mitigative measuresvillages, poor supportinfrastructure

11 Relevance of the tank to 1 - Noimportant historical / 2 - Yesarcheological and religious siteswith in the project area

12 Tribal Population as a % of total 1 - Less than 10%population with in the project 2 - 10 to 15%command area 3 - Above 15 %

13 History of Conflicts (as 1 - Below 10% of project areapercentage of project area 2 -10 to 25% of project areaaffected) 3 - Above 25 % of project area

14 Proportion of Marginal & Small 1 - Below 10%Farmers to total farmers (in 2 -10 to 25%percentage) 3 - Above 25 %

2.4 SCREENING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES AND AEGUARDMEASURES

The following Screening Matrix is to be applied to identified schemes in the phased sub-basins toassess the application of GOI/GoMP Legislative and World Bank Policies on sub-project interventions.

FORMAT SC2- Application of Legislative Policies

Project Name:


11~s£ETq' TinahWaporn

Si. List of Questions If YES NO If UnsureNo

SECTION ASCREENING GUIDELINES ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

I Forests I biodiversityI Does the activity involves destruction, exploitation or removal of any wildlife Requires Consult District

from a sanctuary or destroys or damages the habitat of any wild animal or Clearance Forest Officerdeprives any wild animal of its habitat within such sanctuary from Gol

Comments11 Dams2 Does the activity involve a dam (existing or new) of 10 meters high or more Requires Dam Consult WRD

Safety Plan Dam SafetyExpert

Comments4 Will agriculture intensification lead to use of banned pesticides as identified in Requires a Consult WRD

UNEP Governing Council Decision 19/13C Pest AgriculturalManagement ExpertPlan

Comments3 Does the activity totally eliminate indigenous races of food crop Consult WRD

AgriculturalExpert

Comments4 Does the activity spread of Vector of diseases of livestock Consult District

AnimalHusbandryDepartment

CommentsIV Land5 Does the activity cause risk of floods and damage to downstream resources Consult WRD

EnvironmentalExpert

CommentsSCREENING GUIDELINES ON SOCIAL ISSUES

1 Does the activity involve land acquisition, resettlement or construction on Requires a Consult Districtprivate land, unless there is consensus among all Resettlement Revenue

Plan DepartmentComments2 Does the activity involve resettlement or other adverse impacts on tribal or Requires Consult District

indigenous people IPDP TribalDepartment

CommentsV Concerning Cultural Property3 Does the activity cause damage to places of religious importance and historical Requires a Consult State

monuments and cultural property. Cultural ArchaeologicalProperty DepartmentPlan

Comments4 Does the activity have any adverse impacts on women like increase in work load Requires Consult WRD

Gender Social ExpertAction Plan

CommentsSECTION B

VI I Other Social Issues lComments


I . &ESEMi iFi afonProject Name:

* List of Questions If YES NO If UnsureNo

4 Does the activity have any adverse impacts on the health of the people? Consult WRDSocial Expert

Comments5 | Does the activity restrict the rights of the people over common property Consult WRD

resources? Social ExpertComments6 | Does the activity introduce/promote child Labour? Consult WRD

Social ExpertComments

7 | Does the activity exclude the vulnerable from the benefits? Consult WRDSocial Expert

Comments8 | Does the activity involve production, storage and consumption of tobacco, Consult WRD

drugs, alcohol, etc. Social ExpertComments

Note: These screening data will be further refined as implementation proceeds and will be collated in electronicform for integration into the GIS-based information management system.For Section A: If any of the answer to the questions is 'Yes"then the corresponding EIA or Action Plans have tobe prepared as a part of sub-project and incorporated into the Draft plan and only then implemented. The EIA willbe carried out by Department or by external agency. If answers to all questions are "No" then project can be takenup for the next stage with management measures as illustrated in SEMF.

The relevant Action Plans consist of the following:

* Tribal Development Strategy,

* Gender Action Plan,

* Resettlement Plan,

* Pest Management Plan,

* Cultural Property Management,

* Community Consultation and

* Dam Safety.

For Section B: if some of the answers to the question is "Yes" the physical intervention can still be taken up butonly after adopting appropriate management measures. If answers to all questions are "No" then project can betaken up for the next stage with management measures as illustrated in SEMF.Persistent Orqanic Pollutants: Aldrin, Toxaphene, DDT, Chlordane, Deadline, Endrin, HCB, Heptachlor andMirex (Nine Pesticides in the initial list of the Stockholm Convention on POPs)

25 MONITORING INDICATORS

Monitoring at this stage of the project shall be limited to Process and Output Indicators. Theseindicators are in addition to the to those collected under the Screening Formats. Indicators listed out inthe SEMF shall be reviewed periodically and fine-tuned during implementation of the project.I Process Indicators (Monitoring Agency) I Output Indicators (Monitoring Agency)


Number of Reconnaissance visits (PICU) Salient Features and Spatial Location of problems on sketches/ toposheetsNumber of consultations/sensitization & sub project maps (PICU)Meetings (PICU) Listing of Key non-spatial issues (PICU)Photographs/Recordings and signed List of stakeholders and level of stake (PICU)minutes at consultations (PICU) List of agreed intervention measures for each sub project (PICU)

List of required Action plans or EIA requirement (PICU)


3. STAGE 2 - PLANNING & DESIGN

This Chapter describes the SEMF activities to be undertaken at the Planning and Design Stage, the Roles andResponsibilities and Outcomes of this stage.

31 SEMF ACTIVITIES

Environmental and Social Assessment (ESA) at the sub-project level/sub-basin level by SPIG includingWUAs - Tool to be used is IMPACT Assessment Matrix- IAM & SEMF Table.

The SEMF activities to be undertaken at this stage shall be undertaken by the SPIG or along withExternal Agencies (as per the requirements of the Screening Stage). EIA documents (required for Golclearance), State clearances and Action Plans as identified through the Screening Matrix SC-2 shall beprepared along with the engineering surveys. PICU experts shall advise the SPIG, based on scheme-specific needs, the additional sub-project activities to be carried out at this stage.

The activities include the following:Sub-project Activities Who will be involved Co-ordinator

Training and awareness programme about project objective Other line EE, WRDdepartments, WUAs

Inform stake holders including line department to ensure their Other line EE, WRDparticipation in Joint Walkthrough departments, WUAsJoint Walkthrough and consultations and analysis of alternatives Other line EE, WRD

departments, WUAsPresence of line department officials must be ensured in Joint Other line EE, WRDWalkthrough departments, WUAsPhoto graphs and list of participants attended the Joint Walkthrough Other line EE, WRD

departments, WUAsMapping of issues including critical problems Other line EE, WRD

departments, WUAsLinkage between different social, environmental and other related issues Other line EE, WRDlike R&R and tribal etc.. departments, WUAsAnalysis of alternatives through consultations Other line EE, WRD

departments, WUAsFinalisation of short term and long term interventions separately Other line EE, WRD

departments, WUAsFormulation of the plan and estimate Other line EE, WRD

departments, WUAsPreparation of CPM-PERT chart from date of start to date of finish Other line EE, WRD

departments, WUAsBudgeting including environmental and social mitigation costs Other line EE, WRD

departments, WUAsFormulation of implementation plans in consultation with other line Other line EE, WRDdepartment implementing agency departments, WUAsMilestones for finalisation of Final Bills, Final drawings Other line EE, WRD

departments, WUAs


Sub-project Activities Who will be involved Co-ordinator

Milestones for date of preparation and finalisation of ICR should be Other line EE, WRDfinalised departments, WUAs

Consultation with identified stakeholders for suggestions on the plan Other line EE, WRDdepartments, WUAs

Photographs and signed minutes of meeting along with list of participants Other line EE, WRDdepartments, WUAs

Appraisal and comments of the plan from the concerned Basin Chief Other line EE, WRDEngineer as per checklist for over all review of draft plan departments, WUAs

Incorporation of Chief Engineer's comments in the plan Other line EE, WRDdepartments, WUAs

Consultation with identified stakeholders for finalisation the plan Other line EE, WRDdepartments, WUAs

Photographs and signed minutes of meeting along with list of participants Other line EE, WRDdepartments, WUAs

Submission and appraisal of the plan to the PICU through basin Chief Other line CE, WRDEngineer departments, WUAs

Appraisal of plan by PICU as per checklist for over all review of draft plan Other line CE, PICU,departments, WUAs WRD

Preparation of the Action Plan for Implementation procurement Other line EE, WRDprogramme departments, WUAs

Development of MoU with WUA and other Line agency with plan estimate Other line EE, WRDand schedule departments, WUAs

Outcome of Stage 2: Planning- PICU will appraise Proposal/action plan recommended by the BasinCE, for Implementation in compliance with SEMF. WUA will accept the appraised plan and sign MoUwith EE, WRD/other line agencies.

3.2 IMPACT ASSESSMENT MATRIX - tAM

The Impact Assessment Matrix (which will be further refined during implementation) is to be filled up bySPIG for identification of Impacts of intervention measures. Linkages among various critical issueshave been identified during joint walk through and are addressed in the inter-activity and inter-areaImpacts in a flow chart. (Resettlement & Rehabilitation impacts have already been considered in theprevious stage. In case such issues surface at this stage they may be taken up separately inaccordance with the guidelines of the previous stage.)

3.3 SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK - SEMF

The SEMF table will be used as reference for mitigation measures that may be required for negativeImpacts identified through the IAM. The SEMF table provides comprehensive list of subprojects /activities, their possible negative Impacts and Outcome & Impacts monitoring indicators.

The SPIG comprises of Field formation of WRD, Line departments and PCs / DCs / WUAs, that will befacilitated by MDT/NGOs during Step 2 for identifying the Impacts and selecting sub-project activities.


9SKE!M TFina(tport

3.4 CHECK UST FOR APPRAIL OF DRAFT SUB-PROJECT PLAN

The Checklist for appraisal of Draft Sub-Project Plan shall be filled by the SPIG and reviewed by theBasin CE. On satisfactory compliance of the provisions mentioned the CE shall recommend the planto the PICU for final appraisal against environmental and social safeguard requirements.

3.5 MONITORING OF INDICATORS

Monitoring of indicators at this stage shall be restricted to Process and Outcome Indicators aspresented in the Table on Monitoring Indicators.

Madhya Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project 3,3

- SEF Thina(porl

IMPACT Assessment Matrix (IAM)Put X for negative Impacts and .\for positive or no negative Impacts.

IMPACTS OF Int Int Mitiga JustificACTIVITIES er er tion ation

SUB-PROJECT 0 act ar meas for! DO ¢< s t m2 Z n -o rL -a ° U M I

*) 0 E c 0. * Uo - * ** *ACTIVITIES = _ U) ivit ea ures* decisio0 ) _u I 0 L) I y IM n

PA ACT C

TIRRIGATION & DRAINAGE REHABILITATION

LimitedCatchmentTreatmentDamEmbakmentstrengtheningWaste weirrepairsHead sluicerepairsCanalsembakmentrepairs.CanalStructuresrepairsService Roadconstruction/repairsWater CourseField Channelconstruction.


'V= S£EWF TFhna( ?jTon

IMPACTS OF Int Int Mitiga Justific

ACTIVITIES er er tion ationSUB-PROJECT, 1E act ar meas for

CL a4, . .~, : 0 0F 4

ACTIVITIES = E= E s E c 4, > ivit ea ures* decisioy IM. E na 0c E20 0 05 IM PD

PA ACT C

T

ReservoirfisheriesexpansionPond fisheriesexpansionAGRICULTURE

Cultivation ofHYVs,Introduction of(cash crops /vegetables/Medicinal plants)Introduction ofIPM / INMtechniquesIntroduction ofHorticulturalcropsIntroduction ofFodder trees/shurbs IgrassesLIVESTOCK & ANIMAL HUSBANDRY

Live stockBreedimprovementLive stock Stallfeeding

3-5

&4ihya Pradesh Water Sector Restructuring Project

- SEW Thaina porn

IMPACTS OF Int Int Mitiga JustificACTIVITIES er er tion ation

SUB-PROJECT 0 E ~act ar meas forACTIVITIES °0 -a 0 *a . ! ° ivit ea ures* decisio

rn en < a) 0n az CnD z L 'Z °¢3

ID Environmental & Social Impacts ID Environmental & Social Impacts

Soil e Soil Erosion/Gully Formation Aquatic Aquatic life

Soil q Soil Quality Biodvty Biodiversity

Soil m Soil Moisture Solid W Solid waste

Siltn Siltation Fertlzr Fertilizer use

SW qt Surface Water Quantity Pestcd Pesticide use

SW ql Surface Water Quality Displace Displacement

GW qt Ground Water Quantity Livlihd Liviihood

GW ql Ground Water Quality CPR Common Property Resources

W log Water logging SC/ST Scheduled Caste / Tribe

W sep Seepage /Leakage Women Workload on women

Air PoIn Air Pollution Child lbr Child Labour

Noise Noise Pollution Conflct Conflict

Forest Deforestation Pub Hlth Public Health

Weed Weed growth CultrI Cultural Properties

Wild If Wild life Values Aesthetic / Religious Values


Linkages among various critical issues identified during joint walk through / address inter-activity and inter-areaIMPACTs in IAM

Water Cause Environmental Social ImpactsComponents (Natural/Anthropogenic) lmoacts+ 4 +

Catchment -Land/Soil Sloping land, crop field Loss of soil cover, floods Loss to property, lives andbunds not maintained, > due to siltation of natural loss of fertile landfrequent ploughing drainage area

Submergence- WaterNVeed/Siltation/loss of Weed Growth, Poor Water quality, Shortage of water, water pollution, silt Low Fish producton, potablewatercostAquaculture/Flora-fauna siltation & inlet of untreated wastewater erosion due to tank bed cultivation increased, more workload on women andA t r + children to collect potable water, water bom

DmLekg/Lack of dam safety Shortage of waterDam- Leakage/ watepollution, Water Loss of crop due to

m logging shortage of water

Canl/WtermeieyLc fmitnneo Low banks, silted bed, over Water conflicts increases,system 0 canal due to inadequate b or under canal section, loss of crop productionbudget provision excessive seepage, water adversely affect economy

Agriculture/Horticulture/ Use of fertilizers, pesticides Water pollution, low yield, Low Productivity, loss inFarming system 0 discounted cultivation of b low resistance to insect W income, labour migration

local crops, drought, pest disease

Livestock Lack of quality fodder, lack Low milk yield, prone to Malnutrition, poverty0 of proper health care diseases

HumanCan't cope %with the change | Increase vulnerability, health Increased social conflict, poverty, prone

in environment nrnhlam to diseases, migration

Hydro-power Lack of participatory approach will Loss of land for infrastructure Extra burden, At present powercreate problem in O&M and drainage problem may is free up to 5 HP pumpcreate due to changes in existing


SEMF TABLERecommended Mitigation/Enhancement Measures Monitoring Indicator (Agency

Activity (Agency Involved) Involved)Concerns Opportunities

Irrigation * Non-inclusion / Least importance to . Improvement of . Develop environmental guidelines for MPWRD activities and . Change in attitude of stake holdersSystem views of stakeholders vulnerable groups eventually revise irrigation manual accordingly (WRD) (WRD)

Rehabilitatio * Problems of groups adversely affected (women, tribal, landless, * Develop coordination with all stakeholders (WRD) . Works undertaken under dam safetyn - Overall by change in the hydrological regime etc.) * Require Joint walkthrough and stakeholder consultation (WRD)

* Inadequate targeting of generalized * Wetland conservation process and MOU before physical rehabilitation (WRD) * Change in drainage pattem (WRD)measures and management * Prepare environmental data base for the irrigation and * Change in method of irrigation

* Non-consideration of dam safety . Improve management drainage system (WRD) (WUA's)* Possible land acquisition strategies for dam safety . Implement dam safety plan of all dams and ensure . Change in attitude of silt disposal* Possible impacts on cultural property plans mechanism for regular monitoring plan (WRD, WUA's)* Possible negative Impacts caused by * Enhancement & Control * Develop detailed rehabilitation plan as per the project R&R . Reduction in loss of water (WRD)

poor drainage measures for religious framework consistent safe guard policies of worid bank * Increase in command and crop* Improper disposal of silt uses of reservoirs . Apply the cultural property action framework for the project production. (Agriculture, WUA's)* Improper location of Borrow Pits and * Reduction in loss of * Prepare silt disposal plan . Equitable distribution of water

construction material quarries. water by proper * Strengthen WUAs to run the delivery system independently between head and tail reach of* Unplanned and flooding method of maintenance of Dam and (WRD) command. (WUA"s)

irrigation leads to increased canals. . Develop on farm development and encourage barabandigroundwater levels or water logging * Improvement in water . Develop participatory approach and promote Public-Private

* Leakage of water from canals. distribution techniques partnership (WRD)* Reduction in conveyance capacity in for better distribution of . Rehabilitate project to ensure water delivery effectively to

canal due to lack of maintenance. facilities. control groundwater levels or water logging (WRD)* Loss of water due to its non-utilization . Include environmental mitigation & enhancement clauses in

during kharif period. the contract (WRD). Training and Awareness-building (WRD)

Engineering * Involvement of different administrative . Proper coordination . Ensure strict watch and ward of delivery system till it is . Reduction in conflicts amongworks for units may lead to conflicts within between inter-state and completely transferred to WUAs (WRD) various administrative boundariesscheme different stake holders inter-district stakeholders * Improve security and law-order situation in inter district (WRD)

modemizatio . Lack of communication facility leads to * Adequate communication delivery system to avoid conflicts within stake holders . Refer Chapters 6 to 12, SEMFn (Major, delay in resolving conflicts & wastage of system (WRD) ReportMedium & water from delivery system . Operation and * Develop strong communication linkage with District

Minor) . Potential impacts on R&R, cultural maintenance manual for administration and line department (WRD)property, not addressing dam safety WUA's * Increase frequency of visit of line department officials inadequately, inadequate consultation command (In Line Departments)(especially with SC/ST, women & other * Strong & Efficient Project & District Committees to managevulnerable groups, construction related the system through added Training & Department Supportimpacts, etc. (WRD)

* Ensure adequate conflict management for R&R* Ensure strict watch and ward of delivery system till it is


!- \.9 S;EgdFTFizalqpoil

Possible Social & Environmental Impacts Recommended Mitigation/Enhancement Measures Monitoring Indicator (AgencyActivity (Agency Involved) Involved)

Concerns Opportunitiescompletely transferred to WUA's (WRD)

* Rehabilitate delivery system to ensure adequate and timelysupply of water (WRD)

. Refer Chapters 6 to 12, SEMF ReportAGRICULTU * Loss in soil moisture. . Improving . Promote regular testing of soil to know the soil health . Damage to crops (resistanceRE/INTENSIF . Loss in soil fertility (Nitrogen, Carbon, environmentally-friendly . High nutritional value traditional crops should not be totally against diseases, frost, drought etc.)

ICATION etc.). and organic farming replaced by high yielding varieties. (AGRICULTURE) (Agriculture)* High cropping * Soil and water pollution due to * Change cropping . Rotation of crops with leguminous crops (pea, lentil etc.) will . Production of grain, straw and other

intensity increased use of pesticides and pattems and irrigation maintain soil fertility. (AGRICULTURE) plant products (Agriculture)* Introduction of fertilizers management to use less * Use of bio-compost, organic mulch (Green manure) and - Quality of production (taste, odour,

HYV's . More demand of water for irrigation and water vermi-compost to use of permissible chemical fertilizers and colour, perishability etc.)* Crop competing demands on * Encourage cultivation of pesticides in accordance with Pest Management Plan (Agriculture)

diversification surviving/existing sources, which are fodder. (AGRICULTURE) * Increase/decrease in per unit landused for drinking. * Promotion of agro-forestry to maintain biological fertility of economic benefits (Agriculture)

* Pressure on local forests/ vegetation for soil. (AGRICULTURE) * Changes in nature of soil (fertility,fodder for animals and packaging . Selection of low water demanding crops and rain water hardness, moisture, colour etc.)material. harvesting; storage of surface water (of streams, nalla, etc.) (Agriculture)

* Loss of traditional / indigenous practices through water storage ponds will help harvest more water . Quantity of seeds producedof crop cultivation. for use in HYV cropping. (AGRICULTURE) (Agriculture)

* HYVs are labour intensive and bring * Introduction of altemative crops/ income generation * Reduction/increase of soil erosionmore workload on women. activities for women and other vulnerable groups in and water runoff (WRD)

* Marginal groups (landless accordance with the Tribal Development Strategy and the * Increase / decrease in work load onfarmers/labourers) will less benefit, Gender Action Plan. (AGRICULTURE) women (WRD, NGO's)since they do not have enough land for * Plantation/protection of pest controlling plants (Marigold, * Number of local crop varietiesagricultural intensification. etc.). (AGRICULTURE) grown and area under them

* Due to monoculture chances of crop . Leveling of crop fields and maintenance of terraces / bunds (Agriculture)failure due to frost/fog, insectpest and to check water runoff and soil loss (AGRICULTURE) * Increase/ decrease in the use ofdiseases. . Plantation of fodder species in the uncultivable wastelands non- chemical applications e.g.,bio-

* Discontinuation of barter system and will supplement fodder. (AGRICULTURE) pesticides, mechanical, culturalmore dependency on extemal resources * More participation of males in agricultural activities will activities (Agriculture)/ agents and, therefore, loss of self- reduce workload on women. (AGRICULTURE) . Changes in water quality (bothdependency. . Rotation of crops periodically will restore the soil fertility. surface water and ground water)

* Possibility of loss of local races/ (AGRICULTURE) (WRD, SPCB)cultivars /gene pools/ crop varieties . Use of waste bio-products for packaging (AGRICULTURE)Conflicts among the neighboring . Protected cultivation (use of polyhouse, polypit, polytrench,farmers due to the shade cast from etc.) will reduce the chances of HYV crop failure.vegetative field boundary (AGRICULTURE)


SE9M07 Thza(fRpoil

Possible Social & Environmental Impacts Recommended Mitigation/Enhancement Measures Monitoring Indicator (AgencyActivity (Agency Involved) Involved)

Concerns Opportunities

HORTICULT . Soil water contamination due to use of * Promote value added . Lesser use of permissible chemical fertilizers / pesticides . Increase or decrease of productionURE chemical fertilizers, pesticides and crops will reduce chances of soil contamination and water of fruits and other plant products

DEVELOPME herbicides. * Promote less water pollution. (HORTICULTURE) (Agriculture/Horticulture)NT . Increase in water consumption, requirement fruit crops . Higher use of bio-fertilizers (bio-compost, vermi-compost, . Quality of production (taste, odour,

therefore depletion in water resources. microbial inoculants, etc.) and bio-pesticides will reduce colour, perishability etc.)f The marginal landholders and land less chances of soil contamination and water pollution (Agriculture/Horticulture)fniitcrops will less benefit, as they do not have (HORTICULTURE) . Increase / decrease in economic

enough and to bring under horticulture. * Selection of crops with high efficiency in water utilization benefits per unit landMedicinal . Possible eruption/increase in anti-social and high yield will reduce pressure on water use. (Agriculture/Horticulture)plants practices such as drinking due flow of (HORTICULTURE) * Damage of crops against diseases,

cash after harvest. * Rain water harvesting; storage of surface water (of streams, frost, drought, etc.Floriculture . Health hazards due to more use of nalla, etc.) through water storage ponds will supplement to (Agriculture/Horticulture)

chemical fertilizers & pesticides water needs in HYV cropping.. (HORTICULTURE) . Increase/ decrease in the use of. Preference in employment (labour) to marginal groups. non- chemical applications e.g.,bio-

(HORTICULTURE) pesticides, mechanical, culturalactivities (Agriculture/Horticulture)


SE9WV TinaiWaporl

CHECK LIST FOR APPRAISAL OF DRAFT SUB-PROJECT PLAN

(To be prepared by SPIG and reviewed by Basin CE and then by PICU)Si. No. Items Yes No Remarks

1 Was collection of base line data for proposed plan and OK Stateidentification of stakeholder was done at planning stage? Reasons

2 Were Joint Walk through & Stakeholders' Consultations OK Stateundertaken? Reasons

3 Does the Plan deviate from the original DPR? State Reasons OK

Is the proposed Plan for the implementation violating laws, State Safeguard4 acts, and regulations of Govt. of M.P., Govt. of India

World Bank Document · GIS Geo Graphic Information System GOI Government of India GOMP Government...

Documents

Transcript of World Bank Document · GIS Geo Graphic Information System GOI Government of India GOMP Government...