Working Group for Consolidated Communications Management (JAG-CCM) Update Spring CSAB 2008

15
Working Group for Consolidated Communications Management (JAG-CCM) Update Spring CSAB 2008 Mr. Charles Abel AFWA JAG Representative

description

Working Group for Consolidated Communications Management (JAG-CCM) Update Spring CSAB 2008. Mr. Charles Abel AFWA JAG Representative. OVERVIEW. MEMBERSHIP ACTION ITEM STATUS UPDATE ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS ISSUES. MEMBERSHIP. Walter Coley (AFWA) – Chairman Charles Abel (AFWA) – T - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Working Group for Consolidated Communications Management (JAG-CCM) Update Spring CSAB 2008

Working Group for Consolidated Communications

Management (JAG-CCM) Update

Spring CSAB 2008

Mr. Charles AbelAFWA JAG Representative

2

OVERVIEW

MEMBERSHIP

ACTION ITEM STATUS UPDATE

ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS

ISSUES

MEMBERSHIP

Walter Coley (AFWA) – Chairman

Charles Abel (AFWA) – T

Daniel Starosta (NWS) – T

Barbara Tobe (NWS)

Sheryl Panek (FNMOC)

Jerry Core (NAVO)

Seyed Hosseini (NESDIS)

Bill Godfrey (NESDIS) – T

Ben Kyger (NCEP)

Luis Cano (NCEP) – T

T=Tech support

3

4

ACTION ITEM UPDATE

COPC AI 2007-2.16 NWS Port 20 and 21 convert costs

CSAB AI 2007-2.4 DATMS-U Backup Procedures 2007-10.1 Communication Use Estimates

COPC Action Item 2007-2.16

NWS cost and Schedule to convert to SFTP NWSTG – None; already converted NESDIS – Communicates through NWSTG

SFTP capability - $140K and 4 months

NCEP Official Communication through NWSTG HTTPS, SSH, VPN are available

Recommendation – Convert NESDIS to SFTP

5

6

Action Item 2007-2.4

Documented Backup Procedures DATMS-U Is The Most Reliable Link ~99.99+% All Sites Can Use Internet For Short Term Backup

Capacity has expanded May provide viable backup

Current Documented Backup Procedures Outdated Based on Old data and results

Recommend semi-annual Backup testing Create repeatable backup procedures Eliminate bottlenecks

7

Action Item 2007-10.1

Communications Bandwidth Communications projections recalculated Community activity still a work in progress Consistent method to track bandwidth being tested

Interpretation must be consistent Builds better ‘Big Picture

Site and Systems Accreditation are concerns for security and data throughput

8

NJDATMS-U Connectivity2/20/2008

DATMS-U CONNECTIVITY

LEGEND:CDAAC – COSMIC Data Analysis & Archive CenterFE -- Fast EthernetGb – Gigabits/secMb – Megabits/secOC12 – Connection backside to DATMS-UTLS – Transport Layer Security LinkUCAR – University Corp for Atmospheric Research

-- DATMS-U connection to physical AP1000

14 Mb

6 Mb

6 Mb

50 Mb

6 Mb

NOAA/NWSGateway(62 Mb Total)

100 Mb(FE)

100 Mb TLS

NAVO (12 Mb Total)

100 Mb (FE)

JCSDA

JCSDA

JCSDA

NWS MontereyPass thru to NOAA

JCSDA

JCSDA

FNMOC(26 Mb Total)

100 Mb(FE)

NOAA/NESDIS(DAPE Gateway)

& NAVICE(1 Gb Ethernet)

UCAR/CDAAC

NCEP

OC12

(1 Gb)

FE

AFWA (64 Mb Total)

Current –Spring 2008

9

Current Data Exchange

Data on Apr 18, 2008

   

FY08 Network Service

  FY08 Volume

FY08 Network

Use

FY09 Network

Use Estimate

FY10 Network

Use Estimate

FY11 Network

Use Estimate

FY12 Network

Use Estimate

FY13 Network

Use Estimate

Link Network Capacity

 

Speed   Bytes 24 hours

Avg24 hours

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

NWSTG to DATMS-U  670 GB 62.0 Mbs   233 G 34.8% 52.1% 78.2% 117.3% 176.1% 264.1%

DATMS-U to NWSTG  670 GB 62.0 Mbs   55.2 G 8.2% 12.4% 18.5% 27.8% 41.7% 62.6%

NWSTG to Internet  21.6 TB 2.0 Gbs   1.7 T 7.9% 11.8% 17.7% 26.6% 39.8% 59.7%

Internet to NWSTG  21.6 TB 2.0 Gbs   165.8 G 0.8% 1.1% 1.7% 2.6% 3.9% 5.8%

Dashboard Legend

 

Latency adequate

  Latency risk, initiate network upgrade

Latency issue, network upgrade needed

10

Current Data Exchange (cont)

Data on April 18, 2008

   

FY08 Network Service

  FY08 Volume

FY08 Network

Use

FY09 Network

Use Estimate

FY10 Network

Use Estimate

FY11 Network

Use Estimate

FY12 Network

Use Estimate

FY13 Network

Use Estimate

LINK Network Capacity

 

Speed   Bytes in 24 hours

Avg 24 hours

Avg (24 hours)

@ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

NWSTG to AFWA  540.0 GB 50.0 Mbs   159.0 G 29.4% 44.1% 66.3% 99.4% 149.1% 223.6%

AFWA to NWSTG  540.0 GB 50.0 Mbs   23.0 G 4.3% 6.4% 9.6% 14.4% 21.6% 32.3%

NWSTG to FNMOC 65.0 GB 6.0 Mbs   52.0 G 80% 120% 180% 240% 360% 540%

FNMOC to NWSTG   65.0 GB 6.0 Mbs   25.2 G 38.8% 58.2% 87.2% 130.9% 196.3% 294.4%

Dashboard Legend

 

Latency adequate

  Latency risk, initiate network upgrade

Latency issue, network upgrade needed

11

Current Data Exchange (cont)

Data on Apr 18, 2008

   

FY08 Network Service

  FY08 Volume FY08 Network

Use

FY09 Network

Use Estimate

FY10 Network

Use Estimate

FY11 Network

Use Estimate

FY12 Network

Use Estimate

FY13 Network

Use Estimate

LINK Network Capacity 

Speed   Bytes 24 hrs Avg 24 hrs Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

FNMOC to NAVO  65.0 GB 6.0 Mbs   65.0 GB 100% 150% 225% 337.5% 506.3% 759.4%

NAVO to FNMOC  65.0 GB 6.0 Mbs  

8.6 GB 13.2% 19.9% 29.8% 44.6% 66.9% 100.5%

NAVO to NWSTG   65.0 GB 6.0 Mbs   7.0 GB 10.8% 16.2% 24.2% 36.4% 54.5 % 81.8%

NWSTG to NAVO   65.0 GB 6.0 Mbs   22.2 GB 34.2% 51.2% 76.9% 115.3% 172.9% 259.4%

Dashboard Legend

 

Latency adequate

  Latency risk, initiate network upgrade

Latency issue, network upgrade needed

12

Current Data Exchange (cont)

Data on Apr 18, 2008

   

FY08 Network Service

  FY08 Volume

FY08 Network

Consumption

FY09 Network

Consumption

Estimate

FY10 Network

Consumption

Estimate

FY11 Network

Consumption

Estimate

FY12 Network

Use Estimate

FY13 Network

Consumption

Estimate

Link Network Capacity 

Speed   Bytes 24 hours

Avg 24 hours

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth

Avg 24 hours

@50% growth)

Avg 24 hours @ 50% growth)

AFWA to FNMOC  165.0 GB 14.0 Mbs   90 GB 54.5% 81.8% 122.7% 184% 276% 414%

FNMOC to AFWA  165.0 GB 14.0 Mbs   14.0 GB 8.5% 12.7% 19% 28.6% 43% 64.4%

Dashboard Legend

 

Latency adequate

  Latency risk, initiate network upgrade

Latency issue, network upgrade needed

13

NJDATMS-U Connectivity2/20/2008

DATMS-U CONNECTIVITY

LEGEND:CDAAC – COSMIC Data Analysis & Archive CenterFE -- Fast EthernetGb – Gigabits/secMb – Megabits/secOC12 – Connection backside to DATMS-UTLS – Transport Layer Security LinkUCAR – University Corp for Atmospheric Research

-- DATMS-U connection to physical AP1000

28 Mb

12 Mb

12 Mb

50 Mb

18 Mb

NOAA/NWSGateway(28 Mb Total)

100 Mb(FE)

100 Mb TLS

NAVO (30 Mb Total)

100 Mb (FE)

JCSDA

JCSDA

JCSDA

NWS MontereyPass thru to NOAA

JCSDA

JCSDA

FNMOC(52 Mb Total)

100 Mb(FE)

NOAA/NESDIS(DAPE Gateway)

& NAVICE(1 Gb Ethernet)

UCAR/CDAAC

NCEP

OC12

(1 Gb)

FE

AFWA (78 Mb Total)

DATMS-U Changes –Spring 2008

14

Issues

Interagency Modeling CONOPS Under review by JAG/OCM for potential file sizes

needed for projections

Initial look If GRIB 2 used

Bandwidth increase may be within projections If GRIB 1 used

Initial projection is 3 to 10X current bandwidth More data exchange will highlight bottlenecks

Increased use will accelerate DoD network changes

15

Issues

Meeting Friday with JAG/DISA/NWS 18 April Discussed future of DATMS-U Short and long term solutions Diverse connections between DoD and NWS clouds

Action Items On Scope Of All Team Members

Monthly teleconferences Working relationships at TOC, Navy and AF excellent “Spot” teleconferences key to information exchange Information Assurance now engaged