Workforce Retention in Addiction Treatment: Findings from the National Treatment Center Study
description
Transcript of Workforce Retention in Addiction Treatment: Findings from the National Treatment Center Study
The University of Georgia
Workforce Retention in Addiction Treatment:
Findings from the National Treatment Center Study
Paul M. Roman, Principal InvestigatorCo-Investigators: Aaron Johnson, Hannah K.
Knudsen, and Lori J. Ducharme
This research is supported by NIDA Research Grants R01DA13110, R01DA14482, &
R01DA14976
The University of Georgia
Goals of This Session
• To briefly outline the research design of the National Treatment Center Study
• To describe the addiction workforce, including counselors and program leaders
• To present data and information on counselor turnover at the organizational-level
• To discuss burnout and turnover intention among program leaders
• To outline how programs may reduce counselor burnout and turnover intention
The University of Georgia
The National Treatment Center Study:
An Overview
The University of Georgia
Key Goals of the NTCS
• To document the range of treatment services available in the American substance abuse treatment system– Levels of care, use of medications, types
of therapies, wraparound services
• To understand issues related to workforce retention, including both counselors and program leaders
The University of Georgia
Types of Treatment Organizations
in the NTCS• This presentation focuses on:
– Publicly funded programs– Privately funded programs– Therapeutic communities (TCs)– Centers affiliated with NIDA’s Clinical Trials
Network
• Recently we added methadone programs, but data are not yet available for analysis
The University of Georgia
Public Centers• Nationally representative sample of 362
public centers– 80% response rate
• Eligibility for study defined by funding sources:– > 50% of revenues from government
grants/contracts– Includes government-owned facilities and
non-profit programs that rely on public funding
– Average center receives 84% of its funding from public sources
The University of Georgia
Private Centers
• Nationally representative sample of 403 private centers– 88% response rate
• Eligibility for study defined by funding sources:– < 50% of revenues from government
grants/contracts– Includes for-profit facilities and non-profit
programs that rely on private funding (e.g. insurance, self-paying clients)
– Average center receives less than 20% of its funding from public sources
The University of Georgia
Therapeutic Communities
• Nationally representative sample of 380 TCs– 83% response rate
• Programs only required to identify themselves as TCs– Captures the spectrum of programs that report
using this treatment model– Interviews include measures such as De Leon’s
“Essential Elements” and membership in Therapeutic Communities of America to see how closely programs adhere to the classic TC models
The University of Georgia
NIDA’s Clinical Trials Network• The CTN is a research network that links
university-based researchers with community-based treatment programs in order to:– Conduct multi-site clinical trials of treatment
techniques– Improve addiction treatment quality by moving
evidence-based techniques into practice
• 240 CTN-affiliated treatment programs participated in the NTCS– 92% response rate
The University of Georgia
Types of Programs NOT in the NTCS
• Programs based in correctional settings
• VA programs• Halfway houses & transitional
housing• DUI services• Counselors in private practice
The University of Georgia
Basic Research Methods• Data collected from mid-2002 to early 2004• Three levels of data collection
– Organizations Face-to-face interviews with administrators & clinical
directors Organizational structure, availability of services, staffing
– Leaders Mailback questionnaire Leadership style, organizational strategy, burnout,
turnover intention, demographic characteristics– Counselors
Mailback questionnaire Job characteristics, attitudes toward innovations,
burnout, turnover intention, demographic characteristics
The University of Georgia
The Addiction Workforce:Characteristics of Leaders
The University of Georgia
Average Leader Age & Tenure
• The average leader is about 50 years old– Private center average = 49.9 years– Public center average = 49.7 years
In a recent survey of American full-time workers, the average age of managers was 42.6 years
• The average leader has worked for their center for nearly 10 years– Private center average = 9.4 years– Public center average = 9.4 years
In a recent survey of American full-time workers, the average manager had worked for their organization for 10.9 years
• On average, leaders have worked 18-19 years in the behavioral health field– Private center average = 19.5 years– Public center average = 18.8 years
The University of Georgia
Leader Characteristics:Gender
47.2% 45.7%0%
25%50%75%
100%
% Female
Public Private
• Nearly half of program leaders are female.
The University of Georgia
Leader Characteristics:Racial/Ethnic Minorities
22.4%8.5%
0%25%50%75%
100%
% Minorities
Public Private
• Public centers are more likely than private centers to have a leader with minority background.
The University of Georgia
Leader Characteristics:Educational Attainment
64.1% 69.6%
0%25%50%75%
100%
% MA Degree or Higher
Public Private
• The majority of leaders have at least a Master’s-level degree.
The University of Georgia
Leader Characteristics:Personal Recovery Status
35.5% 38.0%0%
25%50%75%
100%
% Recovering
Public Private
• About one-third of leaders are personally in recovery from substance abuse.
The University of Georgia
Average Leader Salary
• The average leader earns between $55,000 and $65,000 per year
• Leaders of private centers earn more ($64,496) than leaders of public centers ($56,010)
The University of Georgia
Workforce Retention “At the Top”:
Turnover Intention and Emotional Exhaustion Among Program Leaders
The University of Georgia
Turnover in the Context of Leadership
• There has been growing concern about high rates of turnover among counselors at treatment programs
• Relatively little is known about turnover among program leaders
• Turnover of leaders may be even more disruptive to centers– High costs to recruit new leaders– Increases uncertainties for program staff– Disrupts inter-organizational linkages
The University of Georgia
Past-Year Change in Center Administrators
26.3%21.6%
0%10%20%30%40%50%
Public Private
• About 24.0% of centers reported a change in the administration of their center within one year.
The University of Georgia
The Concept of Turnover Intention
• Studies of turnover are challenging to conduct– Most surveys of employees are done just once,
so researchers can’t measure actual turnover
• But turnover intention has been identified as the best predictor of actual turnover over time– “I am seriously thinking about quitting my job.”– “I am actively looking for a job at another
center.”
The University of Georgia
Burnout & Emotional Exhaustion
• Emotional exhaustion as central concept of burnout– “I feel emotionally drained from my work.”– “I feel frustrated by my job.”
• Certain jobs are at higher risk of burnout, particularly those that involve “constantly dealing with other people and their problems” (Cordes & Dougherty, 1993)– Doesn’t that sound like the central task of
management?– They have to deal with funding agencies,
coordinate with other agencies, manage employees, etc.
The University of Georgia
Change in Administrator
One Year Later
EmotionalExhaustion
+
Greater emotional exhaustion and greater turnover intention is linked to greater odds of turnover one year later.
Turnover IntentionChange in
AdministratorOne Year Later
+
The University of Georgia
What are the sources of turnover intention & emotional
exhaustion for program leaders?
The University of Georgia
Organizational Strategy
• Long tradition of studying how perceptions of being “in control” can enhance employee well-being– Control over making the “big decisions”– Control over uncertainties
• Two aspects of organizational strategy are linked to this idea of “control”:– Bold decision-making orientation– Long-term strategic planning
The University of Georgia
Bold Decision-Making Orientation
• “When confronted with decision-making situations, this center typically adopts a bold, aggressive posture in order to maximize the probability of exploiting opportunities.”– In other words…managers have the
power to take risks• Leaders were less likely to be planning
to quit when this orientation towards bold decision-making was higher
The University of Georgia
Long-Term Strategic Planning
• Long-term strategic planning may help managers anticipate future challenges & plan solutions in advance– Includes financial planning, market
research and anticipating where clients will be coming from in the long-term
– Enhances sense of control over the many uncertainties of program management
• Results show that long-term strategic planning reduces emotional exhaustion
The University of Georgia
Performance Pressures as a Stressor
• Another common theme in job stress studies is that work-related pressure increases burnout and turnover intention
• For managers, pressures may be related to the financial performance of the organization– Generating high revenues, minimizing costs,
high patient census
• Greater emphasis on these types of performance increases both emotional exhaustion and turnover intention
The University of Georgia
Participative Management of Staff
• Long line of research shows that participative management is good for staff– Allowing employees to make
decisions about how to perform their jobs
– Providing information to employees about management’s decisions & asking for their input
• But is it good for managers too?
The University of Georgia
Centralized Decision-Making
• Centralized decision-making as the opposite of participative management– “There can be little action taken here until a
supervisor approves a decision.”– “Even small matters have to be referred to
someone higher up for approval.”• While control over “big decisions” may
be good, not letting employees have control over the “small decisions” may increase stress:– Higher emotional exhaustion– Higher turnover intention
The University of Georgia
Involving Employees in Decision-Making
• Managers can actively involve employees in the decision-making process– “I make sure all employee concerns are heard
before job decisions are made.”– “I try to clarify decisions and provide
additional information when requested by employees.”
• Managers that involve employees more in the decision-making process reported:– Lower emotional exhaustion– Lower turnover intention
The University of Georgia
Summary
• Organizational strategy matters in terms of the well-being of program managers– They need control over big decisions– Long-term planning can help– Too much emphasis on (financial)
performance may be detrimental
• Participative management strategies—where employees are more involved in decision-making process—may have important benefits for the well-being of program leaders
The University of Georgia
The Addiction Workforce:Characteristics of Counselors
The University of Georgia
Key Questions about the Counseling Workforce
• Is there substantial “graying” of the counseling workforce?
• Is counseling becoming a “female occupation”?
• To what extent are racial and ethnic minorities represented in the counseling workforce?
• Is there evidence of greater workforce professionalism?
The University of Georgia
Average Counselor Age & Tenure
• The average counselor is in their mid-40s– Private center average = 46.4 years– Public center average = 44.6 years– TC average = 43.5 years
The average American full-time worker is about 40.4 years old
• The average counselor has worked for their center for about 4-5 years– Private center average = 5.3 years– Public center average = 4.8 years– TC average = 4.3 years
The average American full-time worker has worked for their current employer for 8.4 years
The University of Georgia
Counselor Characteristics:Gender
64.0% 57.9% 60.1%
0%25%50%75%
100%
% Female
Public Private TC
• The majority of counselors are female.
The University of Georgia
Counselor Characteristics:Racial/Ethnic Minorities
46.2%
17.7%
44.1%
0%25%50%75%
100%
% Minorities
Public Private TC
• Private centers employ a significantly smaller percentage of minority counselors.
The University of Georgia
Counselor Characteristics:Educational Attainment
37.3% 47.8%26.4%
0%25%50%75%
100%
% MA Degree or Higher
Public Private TC
• Private center counselors are more likely to have a Master’s-level degree than counselors in public centers & TCs.
The University of Georgia
Counselor Characteristics:Certification in Addictions
Counseling
53.1% 59.2%45.1%
0%25%50%75%
100%
Certified
Public Private TC
• About half of the workforce is certified in addictions counseling, but TC counselors are less likely to have this credential.
The University of Georgia
Counselor Characteristics:Personal Recovery Status
51.2% 53.0% 56.5%
0%25%50%75%
100%
% Recovering
Public Private TC
• About half of the workforce is personally in recovery from substance abuse.
The University of Georgia
Counselor Turnover:Associations with
Organizational Characteristics
The University of Georgia
Counselor Turnover in Addiction Treatment Programs
• Previous research shows annual turnover rates range from 18% to 50% (Gallon et al., 2003; Johnson et al, 2002; McLellan et al, 2003).
• Current data shows range between 13% and 21% depending on type of program
• Significantly higher than national average across all occupations (11%)
• Higher than teachers (13%) and nurses (12%) – occupations known for high turnover
The University of Georgia
Comparing Voluntary Turnover
21
13.1
20.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Public Private TC
% Turnover
• Public centers and TCs have significantly higher turnover than private centers (p<.001)
The University of Georgia
What do we know about the differences between these types of programs that might explain
differences in counselor turnover?
The University of Georgia
Private Centers vs. Public Centers and Therapeutic Communities (TCs)
Private centers– Higher % with primary alcoholism diagnosis– Higher % counselors with Master’s degree– Higher average salaries
Public centers and TCs– Higher % relapsers and CJ referrals– Higher % minority clients– Higher % with primary cocaine diagnosis– Higher % minority counselors
The University of Georgia
Results
• Analysis using data from private centers• Higher levels of turnover associated with:
– For profit status– Larger capacity– Composition of workforce– Prior Turnover Rate
• Lower levels of turnover associated with:– Counselor-management relations
The University of Georgia
Explanation of Results – Workforce Composition
• Aspects of workforce affecting turnover– Higher percentage of female
counselors = higher turnover– Higher percentage of counselors in
recovery = higher turnover– Higher percentage of minority
counselors and counselors certified in addictions = lower turnover
The University of Georgia
Explanation of Results – Counselor-management relations
• Participatory management– Center hears employee concerns before making
decision– Receive sufficient notice of changes affecting
work– Effective channels of communication between
employees/management• Organizational commitment
– Willing to put in extra effort to help center succeed
– Proud to tell others I am part of this center– This is best of all possible centers for which to
work
The University of Georgia
What doesn’t impact turnover?
• The diversity of services offered• Counselor education level• Counselor salaries• The types of patients being treated
– Relapsers, CJ Clients, Indigent, Specific drugs
The University of Georgia
Take Home Message
• Turnover breeds turnover – programs with high rates have a difficult time reducing turnover
• Difficult clients are not the issue• Money is not the issue - Increasing counselor
salaries will not reduce turnover• The lowest turnover rates are in programs that
successfully create a smaller “family” type culture in which counselors feel that they are able to communicate with management and are included in important decisions. The result is a workforce committed to the program and willing to work hard to see it succeed.
The University of Georgia
Workforce Retention:Counselors and Turnover
Intention
The University of Georgia
What management practices are associated with lower turnover
intention?
The University of Georgia
The Importance of Organizational Commitment
• One idea is that if employees are committed to the organization, then they won’t leave– Organizational commitment as pride in working at
the center & willingness to put forth extra effort to ensure the center’s success
• Employees will be more committed to the organization if they feel that the organization is committed to them – The norm of reciprocity
• Support for these arguments in a study of private center counselors (Knudsen et al., 2003, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24:129-135)
The University of Georgia
Management Practices That Build Organizational
Commitment• Job Autonomy—authority to make
decisions about how to do one’s job – “I have enough freedom over how I do
my job.”
• Counselors with greater control over their jobs are:– More committed– Less likely to be planning to quit
The University of Georgia
Commitment-Building Management Practices
(continued)• Support for Creativity—managers
encourage counselors to express their opinions and to try new ideas– “Employees are encouraged to develop
their own ideas, even if they deviate from those of the center’s management.”
• Counselors are more committed when they feel that their center supports their creativity
The University of Georgia
Commitment-Building Management Practices
(continued)• Performance-Based Rewards—the
center rewards hard work with recognition, promotions, and raises– “The amount of recognition I receive
when I do a good job is satisfactory.”– “If I perform my job well, I am more
likely to be promoted.”• Counselors are more committed
when centers reward job performance.
The University of Georgia
What else reduces turnover intention?
The University of Georgia
Fairness in the Workplace
• Perceptions about justice and fairness within the organization are important predictors of turnover intention – Sample of TC counselors (Knudsen et al., in press,
JSAT)
• Procedural justice: fair processes– “Job decisions are applied consistently across all
affected employees.”– “When decisions are made, all the people who will be
affected are asked for their ideas.”
• Distributive justice: fair outcomes– “The workload at this center is fairly distributed.” – “Where you work, the amount of pay employees
receive is distributed fairly.”
The University of Georgia
The Importance of Workplace Fairness
• Turnover intention is lower when:– Procedures are perceived to be just– Outcomes (pay, workload, etc) are
perceived to be fairly distributed
• In addition, justice is linked to counselor burnout
• Burnout is higher when:– Procedures are perceived to be unfair– Outcomes are unfairly distributed
The University of Georgia
What does all this mean?
The University of Georgia
• Workforce retention can be improved through management practices
• Managers may benefit by thinking about whether they:– Give counselors enough control over their
jobs– Support creativity– Reward strong job performance– Solicit opinions from counselors before
making decisions– Apply decisions consistently– Ensure that both workload and rewards are
distributed fairly
The University of Georgia
Clinical Supervision:Promising Results for
Reducing Turnover Intention
The University of Georgia
Clinical Supervision:Is It a “Best Practice”?
• High-quality clinical supervision as having two parts:– Supervisor can provide good advice because of his/her
expertise and training– Supervisor does provide work-related advice that
improves the counselor’s ability to treat clients
• To date, there is little research on whether high-quality clinical supervision may reduce counselor turnover– Such evidence might suggest that high-quality clinical
supervision is a “best practice” in program management
• CTN counselor sample was used to address this issue
The University of Georgia
Turnover IntentionClinical Supervision
-.23***
Higher quality clinical supervision is associated with lower turnover intention.
The University of Georgia
Why is clinical supervision associated with turnover
intention?• Is it because the quality of clinical
supervision associated is linked to: – Job autonomy,– Procedural justice, and– Distributive justice?
• Is it because clinical supervision predict counselors’ organizational commitment and emotional exhaustion?
The University of Georgia
Distributive Justice
Job Autonomy
Procedural JusticeClinical Supervision
.42***
.39***
.55***
Clinical supervision is associated with perceptions of autonomy and justice.
The University of Georgia
Clinical Supervision
Job Autonomy
Procedural Justice
DistributiveJustice
OrganizationalCommitment
EmotionalExhaustion
.176***Clinical supervision is only directly associated with commitment
The University of Georgia
Clinical Supervision
Job Autonomy
Procedural Justice
DistributiveJustice
OrganizationalCommitment
EmotionalExhaustion
TurnoverIntention
.27***
-.48***
Turnover intention is associated with commitment and emotional exhaustion
The University of Georgia
Summary of Results
• High-quality clinical supervision appears to improve perceptions that the workplace is fair, which then improves commitment and reduces emotional exhaustion
• By increasing commitment and reducing emotional exhaustion, turnover intention is lower
• The model suggests that high-quality clinical supervision may be a “best practice” of program management
The University of Georgia
In conclusion…
The University of Georgia
Conclusions
• Workforce retention is indeed a key issue facing the substance abuse treatment field– Both for program leaders and counselors
• Attention to organizational strategy and management styles may yield improvement in turnover– Emotional exhaustion and turnover
intention can be reduced
The University of Georgia
Conclusions (continued)
• In general, treatment programs may benefit from:– Encouraging staff to be involved in
decision-making processes– Distributing workloads and rewards
fairly– Improving the quality of clinical
supervision
The University of Georgia
Questions and Discussion
The University of Georgia
Items for Discussion
• Based on your experience in your own programs, what have been some of the main factors contributing to the loss of counseling staff?
• Based on your experience, is the loss of management/supervisory level staff a problem for your program?
• Are the factors related to the loss of management level staff similar to those of counseling staff?
• Have any of you taken steps within your own program that resulted in improved workforce retention?