Wo hop ver - recoveryplatform.org. Serbia... · Di lan nesia r 2012 RM ... RS in long ‐ ational...

WoR

INT

orksReco

Organi

TERNATION

RE

shopover

Jakart29-31

izing Pa

NAL RECOVE

EPOR

p onry P

ta, IndoOctobe

artners

ERY PLATFO

RT n DiPlan

onesia er 2012

ORM

isastnnin

ter ng

INTERNATIONAL RECOVERY PLATFORM | Jakarta 29-31 October 2012 R e p o r t : W o r k s h o p o n D i s a s t e r R e c o v e r y P l a n n i n g

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y i

Executive Summary The workshop on Disaster Recovery Planning was held at Sari Pan Pacific Hotel in

Jakarta, Indonesia, 29‐31 October 2012. It was jointly organized by the National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB), UNDP Indonesia, UNISDR for Asia and the Pacific, European Commission (EC), and IRP. The workshop was designed to support the initiatives of the Government of Indonesia for better disaster recovery operations, specifically by strengthening the manuals on Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) and Monitoring of Recovery Projects that were developed by the national government. The role of IRP experts at the workshop was to provide technical assistance through sharing of lessons from global experiences, and facilitate participant to outline key recommendations for a pre‐disaster recovery plan.

Dr. Syamsul Maarif (Head of BNPB) and Mr. Bambang Sulistianto (Deputy for Reconstruction and Recovery of BNPB) are among the over 32 officials from national government, local governments, development organizations, and civil society organizations participated in the workshop.

At the end of the workshop, participants came up with specific recommendations for pre‐disaster recovery plan. Dr. Syamsul Maarif expressed commitment to learn more about recovery planning and to welcome new ideas from partners. He further expressed working together with key government and non‐government agencies, including international development organizations and UN partners to facilitate synergy and coordinated efforts. Additionally, Mr. Togu Pardede of BAPPENAS expressed commitment to further promote the integration of disaster recovery concerns in development planning. In particular, BAPPENAS is exploring some mechanisms to bring this interest down to the local levels as well as to other sectors of the government that are engaged in recovery planning. Participants coming from universities also expressed interest in utilizing the case studies that are compiled in the Guidance Notes on Recovery to promote learning.

To forward the recommendations of participants, including review of spatial planning blueprint and localization of PDNA and Monitoring of Recovery Projects manuals, BNPB and BAPPENAS plan to further strengthen their DRR activities. The IRP Secretariat, the AHA Centre, the ASEAN Secretariat, and the AusAID Indonesia are also planning to separately discuss any technical support that may be required from the government. One of the options is to strengthen regional partnerships to further enrich knowledge of integrating disaster recovery planning into national DRR plans and other planning instruments.


T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S ii

Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... i

Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... ii

Background ................................................................................................................................. 1

Organizing Partners .................................................................................................................... 2

Participants ................................................................................................................................. 2

Workshop Activities .................................................................................................................... 3

Results ......................................................................................................................................... 5

Way Forward ............................................................................................................................... 7

Annex 1: Note of Introduction .................................................................................................... 8

Annex 2: Module on Disaster Recovery Planning .................................................................... 10

Annex 3: List of Participants .................................................................................................... 15

Annex 4: Programme ............................................................................................................... 17

Annex 5: List of Workshop Materials ....................................................................................... 18

Annex 6: IRP Partners Engaged in Workshop .......................................................................... 19

Annex 7: Scenario for Group Exercise ..................................................................................... 61

Annex 8: Group Outputs .......................................................................................................... 67

Annex 9: Photos ....................................................................................................................... 73

Annex 10: Transcripts of the Workshop .................................................................................. 75


B A C K G R O U N D 1

Background 1. The Workshop on Disaster Recovery Planning held at Sari Pan Pacific Hotel in Jakarta,

Indonesia on 29‐31 October 2012 was one of the 15 workshops covered under the European Commission (EC) funded project titled “Strengthening Region‐based Capacities in Pre‐Disaster Recovery Planning”. This project is being implemented by the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) through the International Recovery Platform (IRP). A note of introduction about the workshop is in Annex 1.

2. IRP, on the basis of its mandate, seeks to contribute to the enhancement of post‐

disaster recovery operations by developing essential capacities through training, experience sharing, and technical exchanges. It addresses the demands of governments, local officials, and leaders who are entrusted with the responsibilities for planning, managing, and executing resilient disaster reduction and recovery activities – including pre‐disaster recovery planning.

3. The overall objective of the workshop was to reinforce the capabilities of government

officials in Indonesia on disaster recovery planning through the support of regional organization such as the Association of Southeast Asian Nation (ASEAN) and the ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance on Disaster Management (AHA Centre) in cooperation with government agencies (e.g. National Disaster Managemetn Agency ‐ BNPB) and UNISDR partners. It is expected that the beneficiaries of the workshop could have a seamless access to the expertise within the region, and plan for a better integration of risk reduction concerns in all phases of the recovery process that builds on the existing assessment of risks. Additionally, the workshop was generally aimed at ensuring that risk reduction approaches are systematically incorporated into the design of emergency preparedness, response, and recovery programs in accordance with strategic goal (c) of the Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA).

4. The Guidance Notes on Recovery, developed by IRP, served as based material for the workshop. It also served as an additional tool for policymakers and planners to effectively address the issues on recovery. The guidance notes, which compile global case studies on recovery, were explained at the workshop because experiences from large‐scale disasters indicate that national and/or local governments are often ill‐prepared to carry out the demanding tasks of planning for effective long term recovery and development. Moreover, governments need to strengthen its capacity in recovery planning because oftentimes the capacity is overwhelmed in the relief and response efforts.

5. The workshop module on pre‐disaster recovery planning (Annex 2), developed on the

basis of the guidance notes, was adopted to facilitate the workshop. This module covered 11 recovery sectors (i.e. climate change, environment, gender, governance, health, infrastructure, livelihood, pre‐disaster recovery planning, psycho‐social, shelter,

IR

INTERNATIONAR e p o r t

andterm

Orga6. Wit

DisaEuro

7. BNPto pIn pdisaNee

8. BNP

prepown

Part9. Ove

orga

AL RECOVERY : W o r k

d telling live m recovery,

anizinh funding aster Managopean Com

PB, as the npromote theparticular, taster recoveeds Assessm

PB and BAparing the nership of p

ticipaer 32 offianizations,

PLATFORM | k s h o p

lessons) wh, can be stre

ng Parsupport frogement Agemission (EC

national agee agenda fohe workshoery operatioment (PDNA

APPENAS wlocal case plans and ou

nts cials fromand civil so

Jakarta 29-31o n D i s

O R

here capaciengthened.

rtners om EC, theency (BNPBC), and IRP.

ency for disor long‐termop was desons, specificA) and Mon

were activelstudies for utputs.

m national ciety organ

Photo 1

1 October 201a s t e r

G A N I

ty of gover

e workshopB), UNDP In

aster manam recovery isigned to sucally by streitoring of R

ly involvedsharing an

governmeizations par

Participants

12 R e c o v e

Z I N G

nment offic

p was jointdonesia, UN

agement of n planning upport the engthening Recovery Pr

in mobilind discussio

ent, local rticipated in

from Indone

e r y P l a

P A R

cials, who a

ly organizeNISDR for A

Indonesia iand other rinitiatives othe manuaojects the a

zing the pons. The pro

governmen the works

sia

a n n i n g

R T N E

re engaged

ed by the NAsia and the

is one of threlated instrof BNPB foals on Post Dagency initia

participants ocess help

nts, develshop (Annex

R S

in long‐

National e Pacific,

he pillars ruments. or better Disaster ated.

and in ensures

lopment x 3).

2


W O R K S H O P A C T I V I T I E S 3

10. The primary participants of the workshop were functionaries from government and regional organizations which would create a standby capacity at the regional level available to any high risk country desiring Pre‐Disaster Recovery Planning (PDRP) support. Other participants were government officials who are engaged in recovery planning ‐ from the national platform, as well as from supporting ministries such as public works, environment, health, welfare, and shelter.

11. In addition to staffers from national and local governments, members of donor

community were also represented, linking with the Making Cities Resilient Campaign of the UNISDR. The composition of participants was ideal in making sure that the planning process encapsulates local knowledge, regional experience, and international sectoral expertise.

12. The participants of the workshop are expected to contribute in (i) building a critical mass

of professionals in country governments oriented towards resilient recovery, and who can inform the recovery processes in the country as well as advocate for “build back better”, (ii) improving the knowledge in managing recovery programs based on lessons learned from prior global experiences, (iii) improving global support for more effective management of recovery after major disasters, and (iv) disseminating additional resources on recovery, reflecting the best of global knowledge, which can assist the participants in recovery project development and execution.

Workshop Activities 13. The three‐day workshop comprised mainly: (i) sharing of stories on recovery initiatives

along various sectors, and (ii) group exercises on recovery planning. Sharing of Case Studies 14. The case studies covered different sectors of recovery as reflected in the workshop

schedule (Annex 4). Lessons drawn from specific case were explained by IRP resource persons/consultants with the aid of PowerPoint presentation. Most of the case studies were taken from the guidance notes, and were presented to provide participants with menu of options in addressing recovery issues. Local participants were encouraged to share local stories and experiences, which will then be added into the online version of the Guidance Notes.

15. Each case study highlighted a unique recovery practice, designed to entice participants

to reflect and analyze whether such practice is applicable to their contexts. In presenting a recovery case, three points were emphasized: (i) the unique feature a recovery practice; (ii) the process how such recovery practice is carried out; and (iii) the lessons that can be disseminated to other countries. In most presentations, photos and graphic illustrations were added in the PowerPoint slides. Some slides show detailed information, including related tools, checklists, and web links to guide participants. Examples of PowerPoint slides are shown below.


W O R K S H O P A C T I V I T I E S 4

16. Printed copies of PowerPoint presentations as well as CDs/USBs containing relevant materials and references on recovery were provided to all participants to be used in workshop. The list of resources contained in the CD/USB is shown in Annex 5.

17. Government agencies of Indonesia, specifically Badan Nasional Penanggulangan

Bencana (BNPB) and Badan Perencanaan dan Pembanguan Nasional (BAPPENAS) – the National Disaster Management Agency and the National Planning Agency, were actively engaged in workshop delivery. In particular, Mr. Bambang Sulistianto, Deputy for Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of BNPB, presented the localized Manual for Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) as well as the Manual for Monitoring Recovery Projects initiated by BNPB. Likewise, Mr. Togu Pardede, Deputy Regional Development and Local Automony of BAPPENAS, shared the lessons learned from disasters in Indonesia and the changes made in the Policy Planning Framework (see presentations in Annex 6).

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

International Recovery Platform

A Tool for Building Back better 19

Case 11: Market Chain Analysis for Livelihood Intervention, HAITI

Background2004 FloodMarket functioning severely damaged

What is Unique? Market chain analysis conducted to recovery normal market functioning

ProcessAssessment of supply chain (Figure 1)Affected poorest: CFW & Food Voucher programsMadam Sares: vouchers for trade & livestocksMiddlemen: vouchers for trade Suppliers: no assistance

LessonsAnalysis helped tailored type of assistance Analysis inform how to restore economic activities

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

International Recovery Platform

Conditions Post Floods and Landslides

Transport and Storage Facil ity Destroyed Left with debt to pay

Lost Pack Animal for transports and stock

Lost Pack Animal for transports and stock

Purchasing power reduced

Unaffected

• Figure 1 Market Chain Analysis

Elevated tracks and bridges reinforced twice after the Great Hanshin‐Awaji Earthquake 1995 and the Sanriku Minami Earthquake 2003

No significant damage to main structures Early resumption of the train service

Reinforcement of Tohoku Shinkansen (bullet train)

Seawalls / Breakwaters

Evacuation Towers

Create land by cutting mountains for houses

Settlements

Fishing facilities

Source: Report of the Reconstruction Design Council

Land use control and housing relocation ‐ Japan

Sample Slide 1: Text

Sample Slide 4: Graphic Illustration

Sample Slide 2: Diagram

Sample Slide 3: Photos


R E S U L T S 5

Recovery Planning Exercises 18. Post‐disaster recovery scenarios from earthquake and floods (Annex 7) were provided to

guide participants who were group into three different teams to plan for recovery. The main objective of each team was to suggest appropriate options to be considered in the recovery plan.

19. Based on their discussions for each recovery sector, the teams came up with basic

principles and guidance for a recovery plan. The recovery plan mentioned the key challenges, the basic approach to recovery, and some of the options to address the issues given in the scenario. The consolidated group output is shown in Annex 8. It contains key recommendations for addressing future recovery challenges following a disaster.

20. The session on Pre‐Disaster Recovery Planning generated substantive discussions (see detailed documentation in Annex 10). As a new concept, most participants raised several questions that facilitated greater understanding and commitment to pursue it in Indonesia.

21. At the workshop, each team was given opportunity to present their output (a form of

policy paper on comprehensive recovery for the government) to other teams at the plenary. During the group presentation, it was assumed that the Governor/political head of the province were attending the briefing. The group presentations provided opportunity for all participants to ask share and ask questions regarding recommendations.

Results Evaluation 22. Feedback on various aspects of the training was drawn from participants’ evaluation and

through informal interactions between training staff and key partners who jointly organized the workshop. The approach of the workshop and the materials used in the training were general regarded as “excellent” or “good”. Participants reported that the workshop addressed knowledge gaps on recovery and reinforced governments’ existing recovery planning initiatives.

23. Some of the specific feedback from the participants are listed below:

What would you change or advance in your jobs after this workshop?

• Develop Pre‐Disaster Recovery Planning at National and Local Levels • Share key lessons on recovery from global and local experiences • Organize follow‐up workshops to orient other agencies on recovery planning • Integrate recovery planning in development


R E S U L T S 6

What help do you need for that change happen?

• Simple and easy assessement methods to inform recovery planning • Improve capacity of local officials at BNPB • Engage more partners in recovery planning and activities such NGOs • Seek strong commitment from politicians • Improve disaster management system in Indonesia • More technical support to BNPB and other key government agencies on recovery in

Indonesia • Easy access to resources and materials

On what topic would you like more information?

• PDNA as to recovery planning process (technical and practical knowledge) • Health and psychosocial recovery • Interaction of health, livelihood, and environment in recovery

24. Overall, the participants expressed that the case studies and examples shared at the

workshops were useful for planning exercises. It was suggested that more detailed explanation of the lessons that are focused on regional cases may be promoted. Cases that are not relevant to the situation of the region may be limited, as it might case information overload. Other suggestions concerning the workshop were,

• To make the slides more attractive with more photos and less text • More discussion on Pre‐Disaster Recovery Planning with details of existing ones • Widely disseminate guidance notes on recovery to different sectors • Keep updating the case studies

25. As participants represented key government agencies (e.g. public works, housing,

health, , social welfare, and governance), the workshop anticipated rolling out initiatives and interagency coordination in recovery planning. The level of participation indicated that the workshop attracted the right audience whom EC and international development agencies can tap to coordinate long‐term recovery efforts. For coordination purposes, the names of participants were added in IRP’s Roster of Experts.

Capacity 26. The workshop resulted into discussions among representatives from government bodies,

national platforms (including CSO members), and IRP partners to further share knowledge and exchange information for recovery planning. The workshop enriched participants’ knowledge of integrating disaster recovery planning into their national DRR plans, UNDAFs, and other planning/programming instruments.


W A Y F O R W A R D 7

Way Forward 27. Dr. Syamsul Maarif, Head of BNPB, has expressed commitment to learn more about

recovery planning and to welcome new ideas from partners. He further expressed to work together with key government and non‐government agencies, including international development organizations and UN partners to facilitate synergy and coordinated efforts.

28. Additionally, Mr. Togu Pardede of BAPPENAS expressed commitment to further promote

the integration of disaster recovery concerns in development planning. BAPPENAS is exploring some mechanisms to bring this interest down to the local levels as well as to other sectors of the government that are engaged in recovery planning.

29. Participants coming from universities also expressed interest to utilize the case studies

compiled in the Guidance Notes on Recovery to promote further learning.

30. To forward the recommendations of participants, including review of spatial planning blueprint and localization of PDNA and Monitoring of Recovery Projects manuals, BNPB and BAPPENAS plan to further strengthen their DRR activities. The IRP Secretariat, the AHA Centre, the ASEAN Secretariat, and the AusAID Indonesia are also planning to separately discuss any technical support that may be required from the government. One of the options is to strengthen regional partnerships to further enrich knowledge of integrating disaster recovery planning into national DRR plans and other planning instruments.


A N N E X 1 : N O T E O F I N T R O D U C T I O N 8

Annex 1: Note of Introduction

UNISDR has been awarded with the EC project called "Strengthening Region based Capacities in Pre‐Disaster Recovery Planning". The project aims globally at enabling high risk countries to establish the temporal link between preparedness, recovery and sustainable development by strengthening capacities for integrating DRR in disaster recovery planning (both pre‐ and post –disaster) and programming.

The key components of the project include:

Overall Objective To reinforce the capabilities of national governments through the regional inter‐governmental organizations and ISDR partners, in Disaster Recovery Planning so that most high risk countries could have a seamless access to such expertise within their respective regions and plan for a better integration of risk reduction concerns in all phases of the recovery process, building on the existing assessment of risks.

Indicator: Each of the five regions (which include the sub‐regions) of the world has at least one regional organisation which is able to provide technical support to its member states on disaster recovery planning either directly or through an established network of practitioners from national, regional and global levels

Expected Result 1: Representatives of government bodies, National Platform members (including CSOs) and UNCTs in approximately 15 countries globally have the knowledge of integrating of disaster recovery planning into their national DRR plans, UNDAFs and other planning/programming instruments as relevant

Expected Result 2: Guidelines developed for integration of DRR into

• Recovery planning • PDNA process • Sectorial guidance notes on recovery • Monitoring and evaluation of recovery impact

Under this component, the project will compile information on existing training material, adapt and translate for specific regional or country needs. Ensure that existing guidance on recovery planning, early assessment of sectoral needs, key experiences on institutional arrangements for recovery and implementation of recovery plans in sectors have integrated disaster risk reduction approaches and expertise are available. Recovery planning is a process that requires involvement of different organisational and sectoral partners. With the central and / or local government in the lead (subject to the scale of the process), it enlists the engagement of regional inter‐governmental organisations, UN Country team, national platforms members (as available), the multi‐lateral development banks and the European Union. Moreover, the expertise required from different development sectors like health, education, infrastructure, shelter, etc. expects the involvement of different government ministries, departments and sectoral leads from UN and the donor community.


A N N E X 1 : N O T E O F I N T R O D U C T I O N 9

The primary target group includes functionaries from government and regional organisations which would create a standby capacity at the regional level available to any high risk country desiring recovery planning support. The primary participants would be government officials who will be engaged in recovery planning ‐ from the national platform, as well as from supporting Ministries, such as public works, health, education, etc. In addition, staff from local and city government as well as international and national agencies will be involved, linking with the Making Cities Resilient Campaign. National Platform members and donor community are also potential trainees. Key civil society organizations will also be engaged in the training. For example the Red Cross Red Crescent Societies and other community based actors play a critical role in the relief, rehabilitation and recovery. Engaging them will also enhance their capacities. For the national level trainings we propose a three day event, participants including those who wish to be trained in recovery planning, as well as who can serve on a roster of experts for deployment in the region if the need arises. They will serve as a reserve of recovery experts, both within the country as well as for possible overseas short term deployment, as required by the regional IGO. The training will empower the participants to draw upon global best practices for recovery and reconstruction. Have a look at www.recoveryplatform.org. Each workshop can engage up to 40 participants, all costs, including domestic travel of participants, training material, venue, equipment, resource persons, etc. will be covered. What we hope to achieve, in the very long term, is develop a mechanism for technical assistance to member states of the regional IGO for recovery planning. The mechanism will draw upon a roster of experts in select member states who may be deployed (1, 2‐3 persons only) to a member state after a disaster to advise the government on recovery planning, in case the government desires such support. The experts will receive regular updates on the knowledge on recovery planning from IRP so the skills are upgraded. The IGO secretariat can play a coordinating role, with full technical support of IRP and UNISDR.


ANNEX 2: MODULE ON DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING 10

Annex 2: Module on Disaster Recovery Planning Method of Delivery: Lecture, discussion, reflection and simulation through scenario

Objectives for Day 1: Site visits to witness resilient recovery in practice and to enhance understanding of participants on what resilient recovery can achieve. Objectives for Day 2: Increase participant’s knowledge and understanding of the concept of recovery and “build back better” Discuss some tools and apply to a given scenario as simulation Learn through reflection and discussion of past experiences linked with tools and practices introduced in the session Title Learning

objectives Elements Duration

(minutes) 1. Introduction to Disaster Recovery

1. To ensure that the objectives of the workshop are clear 2. To introduce the participants 3. To introduce basic terms and concepts

1.1 Overview of day’s objectives 1.2 Introductions 1.3 Introduction to Key Terms (reference: UNISDR terminology – the publication will be distributed on day one – this session will clarify any doubts) 1.4 Discussion on Role of Government in recovery – responsibilities, legislative requirements, involvement of many departments, inter‐sectoral approach to recovery, coordination issues. Session will conclude with participants discussing own experiences with the above issues of recovery. 1.5 Build Back Better – disaster and the window of opportunity. Session concludes with a discussion on examples of “build back better” from experience of participants. Reading Material: 1. UNISDR Terms 2. Guidance notes for Decision Makers

10 10 20 50 30

2. Recovery Planning Process

1. To introduce the scenario on which participants will work over the next three days 2. To show case examples of “build back better”

2.1 Introduce “Scenario” ‐ a disaster situation will be given to participants, who will develop strategies and guiding principles for recovery based on the discussions over the next three days, based on menu of options of different approaches from the thematic sessions and the guidance notes. The link between sustainable recovery and development will be emphasized so the

30



strategies link up with long term development and ongoing development projects 2.2 Examples of Planning Process from Kobe (Phoenix Plan) & China (Recovery Plan) will be introduced and discussed, with focus on potential for replication Reading Material: 1. Scenario will be distributed 2. Kobe Phoenix Plan 3. The Overall Planning for Post‐Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction from China 4. Housing sector recovery plan from Antigua and Barbuda November 2000 OAS and USAID

45

3. PDNA Process

1. To introduce the mechanism and partners of the PDNA 2. To provide links to further information on PDNA

3.1 Introduction to the PDNA Process 3.2 Links to PDNAs 3.3 Discussion on participant’s experiences with PDNA and/or other methodologies of ex‐post assessment of damages and losses Reading Material: 1. Tripartite UN, EC, World Bank agreement on PDNA 2. Knowledge table with display of PDNA documents 3. One recent PDNA will be distributed

30 15 15

4. Workshop 1: Shelter & Infrastructure (6~8 parallel groups)

1. To introduce menu of options of different approaches to recovery for shelter and infrastructure 2. To show case good practice cases on recovery 3. To utilize the given scenario to discuss, in groups, and formulate strategies and guiding principles for resilient recovery

4.1 Key Messages from Guidance Notes – Shelter and Infrastructure 4.2 Presentation of cases focused on good practices 4.3 Discussion in groups focused on practical strategies and guiding principles for recovery 4.4 Presentations by groups on the strategies and principles they elected to adopt. The groups are expected to defend their stand and to challenge other stands – the discussion will facilitate learning through reflection Reading Material: 1. Guidance Notes on Shelter and Recovery IRP 2. Safer Homes, Stronger Communities: Handbook for Reconstructing after Natural Disaster World Bank 3. Guidance Notes on Infrastructure and Recovery IRP

20 + 20 20 + 20 60 70 (Total 210)



Objectives for Day 3: Discuss tools and apply to a given scenario as simulation Understand some challenges to resilient recovery Learn through reflection and discussion of past experiences linked with tools and practices introduced in the session 5. Workshop 2: Climate Change & Environment (6~8 parallel groups)

1. To introduce menu of options of different approaches to recovery for environment and integrating climate change 2. To show case good practice cases on recovery 3. To utilize the given scenario to discuss, in groups, and formulate strategies and guiding principles for resilient recovery

5.1 Key Messages from Guidance Notes – Environment and Climate Change 5.2 Presentation of cases focused on good practices 5.3 Discussion in groups focused on practical strategies and guiding principles for recovery 5.4 Presentations by groups on the strategies and principles they elected to adopt. The groups are expected to defend their stand and to challenge other stands – the discussion will facilitate learning through reflection Reading Material: 1. Guidance Notes on Environment and Recovery IRP 2. Guidance Notes on Climate Change and Recovery IRP

20 + 20 20 + 20 60 70 (Total 210)

6. Workshop 3: Health & Psychosocial (6~8 parallel groups)

1. To introduce menu of options of different approaches to recovery for health and psychosocial issues 2. To show case good practice cases on recovery 3. To utilize the given scenario to discuss, in groups, and formulate strategies and guiding principles for resilient recovery

6.1 Key Messages from Guidance Notes – Health and Psychosocial issues in Recovery 6.2 Presentation of cases focused on good practices 6.3 Discussion in groups focused on practical strategies and guiding principles for recovery 6.4 Presentations by groups on the strategies and principles they elected to adopt. The groups are expected to defend their stand and to challenge other stands – the discussion will facilitate learning through reflection Reading Material: 1. Guidance Notes on Health and Recovery IRP 2. Guidance Notes on Psychosocial issues and Recovery IRP

20 + 20 20 + 20 60 70 (Total 210)

7. Prioritizing Recovery Projects

1. Introduce the dilemma of balancing conflicting demands in recovery, and

7.1 Principles & Examples Reading Material: 1. Guidance Notes for Decision Makers IRP 2. Disaster Recovery Toolkit page 12‐13 COSCDA

60



diversion of funds from on‐going development work 2. Suggest methodology to facilitate prioritization

Objectives for Day 4: Discuss tools and apply to a given scenario as simulation Learn through reflection and discussion of past experiences linked with tools and practices introduced in the session Understand the different approaches possible for resilient recovery 8. Workshop 4: Gender & Livelihoods (6~8 parallel groups)

1. To introduce menu of options of different approaches to recovery for gender and livelihoods 2. To show case good practice cases on recovery 3. To utilize the given scenario to discuss, in groups, and formulate strategies and guiding principles for resilient recovery

8.1 Key Messages from Guidance Notes – Gender and Livelihoods in Recovery 8.2 Presentation of cases focused on good practices 8.3 Discussion in groups focused on practical strategies and guiding principles for recovery 8.4 Presentations by groups on the strategies and principles they elected to adopt. The groups are expected to defend their stand and to challenge other stands – the discussion will facilitate learning through reflection Reading Material: 1. Guidance Notes on Gender and Recovery IRP 2. Guidance Notes on Livelihoods and Recovery IRP

20 + 20 20 + 20 60 70 (Total 210)

9. Workshop 5: Governance (6~8 parallel groups)

1. To introduce menu of options of different approaches to recovery for gender and livelihoods 2. To show case good practice cases on recovery 3. To utilize the given scenario to discuss, in groups, and formulate strategies and guiding principles for resilient recovery

9.1 Key Messages from Guidance Notes – Governance in Recovery 9.2 Presentation of cases focused on good practices 9.3 Discussion in groups focused on practical strategies and guiding principles for recovery 9.4 Presentations by groups on the strategies and principles they elected to adopt. The groups are expected to defend their stand and to challenge other stands – the discussion will facilitate learning through reflection Reading Material: 1. Guidance Notes on Governance and Recovery IRP

15 30 45 60 (Total 150)



10. Funding Recovery

1. Introduce options for funding the recovery 2. Provide links for further research

10.1 Options such as CAT Bonds, Insurance, etc. 10.2 Cases of good practice 10.3 Discussion on experiences and replication of good practices Reading Material: 1. From World Bank 2. Resource Person from Bank

30 30 30

11. Closing 1. Vote of Thanks 2. Distribution of certificates to participants

30

Note: Coffee/tea will be available in rooms. Participants are free to help themselves during discussion time

Useful web links for reference:

www.recoveryplatform.org

www.gfdrr.org


A N N E X 3 : L I S T O F P A R T I C I P A N T S 15

Annex 3: List of Participants

Participantes al Taller Regional de Entrenamiento en Planificación de la Recuperación Pre Desastres / Ciudad de Panamá, 24-26 de Sept. 2012

Name Position/Organization Contact

1. Mr. Ir. Bambang Sulistianto MM – Deputy of BNPB in Rehabilitation and Reconstruction BNPB

Mobile: 081381218055

2. Ms. Maria Anshor Head of Research and Study Division of KPAI

3. Ms. Soraya Rawli Female National Commission Phone: 01316170145

4. Mr. Togu Pardede Deputy of Regional Development and local Autonomy, Bappenas

[email protected] Phone: 62 21 3926 249 Mobile: 082112165326

5. Mr. Siswanto Budi Prasodjo BNPB Phone: '08129211622

6. Ms. Mariya S. Sidoki Director of DALA, BNPB

7. Mr. Siprianus Bate Soro UNDP

8. Mr. Sumatera Barat BPBD

9. Suci WHO

10. Waspada KPAI

11. Achmad Devi, S‐Sos. BPBD Bengkulu Phone: 08117361172

12. Thomas Bangke BPBD NTT Phone: 081339003918

13. Wahyudi BPBD Aceh Phone: 081377362277

14. M. Hartawan BPBD Prop Lampung Phone: 082776753800

15. Arus Horison BPBD Central Java e‐mail: [email protected]: 081318585764

16. Yuniarti Wahyuningfsas WHO [email protected]: 08176704518

17. Ir. Risona BPBD Bke Phone: 081373646589

18. Yazid Falhli BPBD‐SB Phone: 08126605955

19. Burhanuddin BNPB, RR e‐mail: [email protected]: 081381638119

20. Teti

21. Yan Eoh BNPD NTT

22. Rini Health Ministry

23. Mr. Anonymous

24. Helmy Social Ministry

25. Mariya S. Sidoki BNPB Phone: 081339322783

26. Suryadi BPBD West Sumatera Phone: 081266359228

27. Burnadus BNPB e‐mail: [email protected]: 081318585764


A N N E X 3 : L I S T O F P A R T I C I P A N T S 16

Name Position/Organization Contact 28. Achmad Devi. S.bs.MW BPBD Bhe Phone: 0811736192

29. Arlul Wabid BPBA, ACHE Phone: 08121087511

30. Budhi UNDP

31. Pudi Rahor BNPB

32. Luna Sofiani UNICEF e‐mail: [email protected] Phone: 08121070104

33. Eddy PU‐SDA Phone: 081513299268

34. Setiorini Kemkas, PPKK e‐mail: [email protected] Phone: 08128580076

35. Arta Widya Taruwilnas. Pu e‐mail: [email protected]

36. Hariyono BNPB Phone: 0811157175

37. Nurul Fadillah Kemen … e‐mail: dilla‐[email protected]: 081316170145

38. Utung Tobini BPBD Sulteng Phone: 085241266249

39. Sfi Rahayv Kemeatan, PSP Phone: 081318389840

40. Rudi Pakpahan Bappenas Phone: 081513227228

41. Nehi Nuraeni UNDP e‐mail: nehi‐[email protected]: 08121050516

42. Jeong Park AusAID e‐mail: [email protected]: 62 21 2550 5567

43. Dr.Herry Yogaswara, MA Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Research Center for Population

e‐mail: [email protected]: 62 8787 2394 395

44. Lu'lu Muhammad UNDP e‐mail: [email protected]: 062213442985


A N N E X 4 : P R O G R A M M E 17

Annex 4: Programme

Workshop on Disaster Recovery Planning 29‐31 October 2012, Jakarta, Indonesia

Agenda

Day 1

09:00~09:15 Opening Opening Speech

Head of BNPB (tbd)

09:15~09:30 Tea Break

09:30~10:15 Introduction of RR process (RRG) Introduction to Disaster Recovery Video: “Building Back Better”

BNPB IRP IRP

10:15~10:45 Renaksi/Action Plan Process BNPB/Bappenas 10:45~11:15 Monitoring and Evaluation of Recovery process BNPB 11:15~12:00 Governance IRP 12:00~13:00 Lunch 13:00~14:00 Infrastructure IRP 14:00~15:00 Shelter IRP 15:00~15:15 Scenario for Planning IRP

14:30~17:00 Workshop 1: Governance, Infrastructure, & Shelter (including 15 minutes tea break & group presentations) IRP

Day 2

09:00~11:00 Case Studies Presentation - Health - Psychosocial

IRP

11:00~12:30 Workshop 2: Health & Psychosocial (including 15 minutes tea break & group presentations) IRP

12:30~13:30 Lunch

13:30~15:30 Case Studies Presentation - Environment - Climate Change

IRP

15:30~17:00 Workshop 3: Climate Change & Environment (including 15 minutes tea break & group presentations) IRP

Day 3

09:00~10:30 Case Studies Presentation - Financing Recovery - Gender

IRP

10:30~12:30

Case Studies Presentation (including 15 minutes tea break) - Pre-Disaster Recovery Planning (PDRP) - Video Livelihoods: “Building Back Better Gujarat” - Livelihoods

IRP

12:30~13:30 Lunch

13:30~16:00 Workshop 4: Gender, PDRP, & Livelihoods (including 15 minutes tea break & group presentations) IRP

16:00~16:30 Telling Live Lessons IRP

16:30~17:00 Closing (evaluation & feedback) Closing Speech

IRP BNPB


A N N E X 5 : L I S T O F W O R K S H O P M A T E R I A L S 18

Annex 5: List of Workshop Materials FOLDER DOCUMENT

1. Introduction to Disaster Recovery

• Natural Hazards, Unnatural Disasters (The World Bank) • Learning from Disaster Recovery: Guidance for Decision Makers• UNISDR Terminology (English, Russian, and Spanish) • Post Disaster Recovery Guidelines (UNDP)

2. Planning Process

• Hyogo Phoenix Plan (book) • Los Angles Recovery and Reconstruction Plan • Hyogo Phoenix Plan (ppt) • The Overall Planning for Post‐Wenchuan Earthquake

Restoration and Reconstruction • Hope Beyond the Disaster (7 Principles of Tohoku Recovery) • Pre‐Disaster Recovery Plan of Tokyo Metropolitan Government

3. PDNA Process

• Basics of PDNA • PCNA‐PDNA Joint Declaration (EU‐UNDG‐WB) • PDNA Haiti 2010 (and links to all PDNA Reports)

4. Guidance Notes on Recovery (PDF)

(1) Infrastructure, (2) Shelter, (3) Health, (4) Psychosocial, (5) Climate Change, (6) Environment, (7) Governance, (8) Gender, (9) Livelihoods, (10) Telling Live Lessons, (11) Pre‐Disaster Recovery Planning

5. Power Point Presentations (PPTs)

(1) Introduction to IRP & Disaster Recovery, (2) Infrastructure, (3) Shelter, (4) Health, (5) Psychosocial, (6) Climate Change, (7) Environment, (8) Governance, (9) Gender, (10) Livelihoods, (11) Telling Live Lessons, (12) Pre‐Disaster Recovery Planning, (13 ) Financing Recovery, (14) Scenario Group Exercises

6. Handouts

(1) Introduction to IRP & Disaster Recovery (2) Basics of PDNA (3) Infrastructure (4) Shelter (5) Health (6) Psychosocial (7) Climate Change (8) Environment (9) Governance (10) Gender (11) Livelihoods (12) Telling Live Lessons (13) Pre‐Disaster Recovery Planning (14) Financing Recovery (15) Scenario for Recovery Planning

7. Funding Recovery

• Financing recovery (World Bank Document) • Prioritizing Recovery Projects (COSDA document)

8. Evaluation • Evaluation Form (English, Russian, Spanish)


A N N E X 6 : L O C A L P R E S E N T A T I O N S 19

Annex 6: Local Presentations 1. BNPB

Wo hop ver - recoveryplatform.org. Serbia... · Di lan nesia r 2012 RM ... RS in long ‐ ational...

Documents

Transcript of Wo hop ver - recoveryplatform.org. Serbia... · Di lan nesia r 2012 RM ... RS in long ‐ ational...