Wisconsin Park and Recreation Association Region 3 Meeting Important Concepts in Local, County and...
-
Upload
randolph-ryan -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Wisconsin Park and Recreation Association Region 3 Meeting Important Concepts in Local, County and...
Wisconsin Park andRecreation Association
Region 3 MeetingImportant Concepts in Local,
County and State Parks
“Implementing Concepts for Successful Park Planning: From Local to Regional Land Legacy
Initiatives(And How Your UW-Extension Office Can Help!)”
Thursday, February 8, 2007City Hall, Jefferson, Wisconsin
Presented By:
Steve Grabow, Community Development Educator and ProfessorUW-Extension, Jefferson County
Presentation Purpose
Process Guidance:
Provide an understanding of an integrated approach to successful park planning based on a research-based approach.
Overview and Content:
Provide insights to the Wisconsin DNR/County/UW-Extension partnership resulting in the Land Legacy Program – The Glacial Heritage Area Initiative
Throughout This Presentation:
Describe some of the ways UW-Extension can support local, County and State parks initiatives.
Fundamental Benefits of Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Parks are one of the most effective ways to build a sense of community and an improved quality of life.
Parks provide intrinsic environmental, aesthetic and recreational benefits to communities.
Open space/green relief in the cities.
A vision to preserve natural wonders and wilderness.
Recreation and “play” spaces in urbanizing areas.
Common spaces where diverse populations can intermingle.
The parks, recreation and conservation movement in America started in the later 1800s in response to a need for:
Fundamental Benefits of Parks, Recreation and Open Space
All great communities are known for having great parks and their ability to provide recreation, natural beauty and signature places in the “public domain”.
Parks help build civic pride and communitylivability, enhance tourism and economicinvestment, and contribute to health andquality of life.
UW-Extension can help people understandthe benefits of parks, recreation and conservation.
PROCESS GUIDANCE
Plan Process
Meaningful planning and change process require an integration of learning opportunities, research and expert involvement, citizen participation and a sound planning approach.
UW-Extension can help the community in designing a response to parks initiatives by:
Providing research when needed
Providing learning and educational opportunities when appropriate
Helping design planning approaches when the time is right for planning
Helping design and facilitate meaningful public participation as needed.
Plan Process
UW-Extension can help the community in designing a response to parks initiatives by:
Helping to understand and access “experts” (often the department heads, agency representatives and consultants) as is realistic
Helping to position the community to incorporate coordinate and link these many purposes which are needed at different times
Summary of Steps
General Approach to Comprehensive Planning:
A Road Map
The Approach
Step 1 Initial
Education and
Diagnosis
Step 2 Plan for Planning
Step 3 Background Information
and Inventory
Step 4 Trends and Assessment
Step 5 Issue
Identification and
Visioning
Step 6a Strategy
Formulation and
Alternative Responses
Step 6b Strategy
Formulation and Select Preferred
Alternatives
Step 7 Plan Review
and Approval
Step 8 Plan
Implemen-tation
Step 9 Plan
Monitoring, Reassessment
and Amendment Procedure
Determine How the Smart Growth Law and Elements Relate to the Approach See detailed charts (Figures B, C, and D) for each step
Show Examples of Output for Each Step See detailed charts (Figures B, C, and D) for each step
Source: University of Wisconsin Extension Citizen Participation Team/Comprehensive Planning Committee
Facilitated and Compiled by Steve Grabow, Associate Professor, May 2000
Definition of Approach: A mode of conduct with a series of steps directed toward achieving desired results.
Generate – Organize – Select: A three-step “mini-process” that occurs in many of the steps in the comprehensive planning approach.
13
General Approach to Planning: A Road Map
UW-Extension can help the community to understand the planning process (See Grabow, et. al. “Comprehensive Planning and Citizen Participation” – 2006, on-line at www.uwex.edu/ces/cty/jefferson)
Parallel or Concurrent Processes
Parallel or Concurrent Processes Which Occur During the Comprehensive PlanThe illustration below shows that there are parallel tracks of purposeful activities that occur during the carrying out of the comprehension planning process. For example, thereshould be learning and education taking place throughout the comprehensive planning. Similarly, there needs to be routine evaluation and assessment about how well thecomprehension planning is going. The approach for “Education and Learning” and for “Evaluation” should be determined early and should be planned out ahead of time. Andthroughout these approaches, citizen’s must be involved at appropriate times, and they should be given an opportunity to continually contribute to the comprehensive plan. Thegraphic below illustrates how planning, citizen participation, education of the citizens/planners, and evaluation of the approaches occur concurrently.
PARALLEL TRACKS Track 1 Comprehensive Planning: The Approach
Track 2 Citizen Participation Diagnose & Plan
the Approach
Track 3 Education and Learning Diagnose
& Planthe Approach
Track 4 Evaluation Diagnose
& Planthe Approach
Step 1Initial
Educationand
Diagnosis
Step 2Plan forPlanning
Step 3BackgroundInformation
andInventory
Step 4Trends andAssessment
Step 5Issue
Identificationand
Visioning
Step 6aStrategy
Formulationand
AlternativeResponses
Step 6bStrategy
Formulationand SelectPreferred
Alternatives
Step 7Plan
Review andApproval
Step 8Plan
Implementation
Step 9Plan
Monitoring,Reassessment
andAmendmentProcedure
?
Figure E
Source: University of Wisconsin-Extension, Citizen Participation Team/Comprehensive Planning Committee
Dynamics of Group Decision-Making
Citizen Participation Methods(A short list of 14)
(UW-Extension professionals are skilled in these methods.)
Special Emphasis in Parks Planning
In Step 1 (Initial Education and Diagnosis), use the UW-Extension, media and internet for unlimited opportunities to ready the community for planning.
In Step 2 (Plan for Planning), it is critical to design a sound approach and determine the people and resources to involve; UW-Extension can assist in RFP development.
In Step 3 (Background Information and Inventory), it is important to have expert observations in site analysis.
Strong designers provide valuable clues to site limitations and site opportunities.
Special Emphasis in Parks Planning
In Step 5, (Issue Identification and Visioning), there are many opportunities to use creative, interactive tools for public involvement.
Favorite Tools: “Concerns and Hopes” (for the overall plan and/or site)
Open House Workshop Drop-Off Opinion Surveys (inform/educate first and then survey)
Focus Group Interviews (powerful technique to get at possible issues, vision ideas and to explore or test strategy ideas)
Visioning/Design Charette (using base maps, aerials, markers)
OVERVIEW AND CONTENT
Nature-Based orNatural Resource-Oriented Parks
(UW-Extension can refer to important research-based resources.)
There are ten activities which account for most recreation time for “natural-type” park users:
The order of importance varies significantly by age groups.
Camping
Fishing
Hiking
Biking
Picnicking
Relaxing
Sightseeing/Pleasure Driving
Swimming
Sunbathing
Nature Walking/Wildlife Viewing
Source: George E. Fogg. Park Planning Guidelines. NRPA, 1995.
Jefferson County adapted Phil Lewis’ research (UW-Madison/Extension Landscape Architect) to identify “attributes” for priority ranking of potential “natural resource-oriented” parks
The “attributes checklist” included: Proximity to environmental corridor
Along or near an existing trail corridor
Scenic overlooks
Cultural/Historic Features
Native vegetation
Undisturbed
Glacial features
Adjacent or near state land
Water present
Nature-Based orNatural Resource-Oriented Parks
UW-Extension can help in the use of “decision matrices” and other decision-making techniques; it also provides access to UW campus specialists.
Prior Jefferson County Parks-Related Planning
(UW-Extension has been involved in different ways for each initiative.) Jefferson County Bikeway/Pedestrianway Plan (1996)
Jefferson County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (June 1997)
Jefferson County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan 2005-2010 (February 2005)
UW-Madison Graduate PlanningWorkshop “Impacts and Benefits ofParks, Recreation and Land Preservation”
Jefferson County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
2005-2010
Prepared for:Jefferson County Parks Department
March 1, 2005
Linkages to Other Plans(UW-Extension can inform the interface among different
plans.)
Integrate strategies in the Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan
Integrate with strong community plans
Key Ideas From New Parks Plan
Integrate Jefferson County Parks Vision and Strategies with Glacial Heritage Area (Land Legacy Initiative)
UW-Extension can provide important context for complex partnerships because of its unique role in serving local, County and State interests)
Key Ideas From New Parks Plan
Provide emphasis to the Glacial Heritage Area
UW-Extension can be a continuous resource for incorporating sound principles of “change”:
Understanding and Leading “Change”(UW-Extension can help leaders understand principles of
change.)
Principles of “Change”:
1. Framing the “sense of urgency” to do something
2. Helping to identify and form “guiding coalitions”
3. Assisting in the design and facilitation of “vision and strategy” approaches
4. Helping to “communicate for understanding”
5. Alerting the community to the importance of “broad-based and empowered action”
6. Advising about the need for “early evidence of progress”
7. Foster “determination, persistence and on-going process refinements”
8. Help reinforce the “value of successful change” and long-term cultural changes
John Kotter (1996). Leading Change
Closing – Framing the Challenge(UW-Extension can be a versatile resource in helping
to address complex challenges.)
How can we preserve our natural resources and rural character while making all our communities healthier, more livable and more enjoyable for our families?