Wireless Assistive Control Device Upper Extremity Motion Capture Sensor Melissa Gilbert Alan Smith...

6
Wireless Assistive Control Device Upper Extremity Motion Capture Sensor Melissa Gilbert Alan Smith Jonathan Guerrette Dan Chapman Pooja Nanda Adey Gebregiorgis

description

Benefits of the BioRadio Concepts A B Custom Circuit BioRadi o Selection CriteriaWeight Ratin gNotesWtd Ratin gNotesWtd Mechanical Integration214% System Overhead429% Accuracy536% Cost321% Wireless Transmission214% PC Software Capabilities321% Timed Integration of Sensors536% Design Time536% Total Score Rank 2 1 Continu e? No Yes

Transcript of Wireless Assistive Control Device Upper Extremity Motion Capture Sensor Melissa Gilbert Alan Smith...

Page 1: Wireless Assistive Control Device Upper Extremity Motion Capture Sensor Melissa Gilbert Alan Smith Jonathan Guerrette Dan Chapman Pooja Nanda Adey Gebregiorgis.

Wireless Assistive Control Device

Upper Extremity Motion Capture Sensor

Melissa GilbertAlan Smith

Jonathan GuerretteDan Chapman

Pooja NandaAdey Gebregiorgis

Page 2: Wireless Assistive Control Device Upper Extremity Motion Capture Sensor Melissa Gilbert Alan Smith Jonathan Guerrette Dan Chapman Pooja Nanda Adey Gebregiorgis.

Action Items completed Concept selection matrix completed for

sensors, data acquisition system, GUI Up to date -> all living documents

2-Q plan, 1 page summary, customer needsSpecification finalized

Page 3: Wireless Assistive Control Device Upper Extremity Motion Capture Sensor Melissa Gilbert Alan Smith Jonathan Guerrette Dan Chapman Pooja Nanda Adey Gebregiorgis.

Benefits of the BioRadioConcepts

  A     B         

       Custom Circuit    

BioRadio  

Selection Criteria WeightRatin

g Notes WtdRatin

g Notes Wtd

Mechanical Integration 2 14% 2   0.29 3   0.43

System Overhead 4 29% 5 1.43 3 0.86

Accuracy 5 36% 2 0.71 5 1.79

Cost 3 21% 3 0.64 5 1.07

Wireless Transmission 2 14% 3 0.43 5 0.71

PC Software Capabilities 3 21% 2 0.43 3 0.64Timed Integration of

Sensors 5 36% 2 0.71 4 1.43

Design Time 5 36% 1   0.36 5   1.79

   Total

Score   5.00     8.71  

    Rank   2     1  

   Continu

e?   No     Yes  

Page 4: Wireless Assistive Control Device Upper Extremity Motion Capture Sensor Melissa Gilbert Alan Smith Jonathan Guerrette Dan Chapman Pooja Nanda Adey Gebregiorgis.

Matrix selection for motion sensors

Concepts  A     B     C             Accelerometer Goniometer Gyroscopes

Selection Criteria Weight Rating Notes Wtd Rating Notes Wtd Rating Notes Wtd

Signal Processing 5 21% 1   0.21 3   0.63 1   0.21

Mechanical Integration 5 21% 1 0.21 3 0.63 3 0.63

Power Requirement 3 13% 4 0.50 4 0.50 4 0.50

Position Accuracy 5 21% 1 0.21 4 0.83 1 0.21

System Overhead 3 13% 4 0.50 2 0.25 4 0.50

Cost 3 13% 4   0.50 2   0.25 4   0.50

    Total Score   2.13     3.08     2.54  

    Rank   8     5     6  

    Continue?   No     No     No  

Page 5: Wireless Assistive Control Device Upper Extremity Motion Capture Sensor Melissa Gilbert Alan Smith Jonathan Guerrette Dan Chapman Pooja Nanda Adey Gebregiorgis.
Page 6: Wireless Assistive Control Device Upper Extremity Motion Capture Sensor Melissa Gilbert Alan Smith Jonathan Guerrette Dan Chapman Pooja Nanda Adey Gebregiorgis.

New Action Items Setup SVN for entire group Brace concept selection matrix Mechanical integration of sensors More Brace research and prototyping Research extensively final sensor selection

Compare data sheets Obtain samples