Wirc-icai.org Wirc Referencer Income Tax Wealth%
-
Upload
vermanaval -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Wirc-icai.org Wirc Referencer Income Tax Wealth%
8/3/2019 Wirc-icai.org Wirc Referencer Income Tax Wealth%
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wirc-icaiorg-wirc-referencer-income-tax-wealth 1/7
APPEALS
Section Appealto Filing
Time
Limit Fee Form
No. Documents Remarks
246A CIT(A) 1) 30days fromthedate of receipt of notice of demand.Sec. 249(2) 2) CIT(A)has powertocondonedelayu/s 249(3) onshowingSufficientcause.
a) Courtfee stampof 50 paiseon FormNo. 35 andof 65 paiseon copy of Assessmentorder.
b) Appealfees:1. Rs.250.
a) Whereassessedtotalincome isRs. 1 lakhor less.
b) Whereappeals are
filed onissues suchas penaltyorder, TDSdefaults,non-filingof returns,etc. whichcannot belinked withtheassessed
income. 2. Rs. 500,whereassessedtotalincome ismore thanRs. 1 lakhbut notmore thanRs. 2 lakhs. 3. Rs.1,000,where
35 1. Form No.35-induplicate. 2. Orderappealedagainst- 2copies-certified. 3. Grounds of
Appeal andStatement of Facts (induplicate)
4. Notice of Demand(original) 5. In the caseof appealagainstpenalty
order-2copies of relevantorder. 6. Proof of payment of appeal filingfee.
7. Affidavitstatingreasons for
delay in filingappealbeyond 30days for latefiling.
1) Personauthorised to signreturn of Incomeu/s. 140, must signappeal form.
2) Appealableorders areassessmentOrders,
reassessmentorders, Penaltyorders and otherorders as listedunder the relevantsection. Appealdoes not lie againstthe order which isnot covered by246A.
3) Appeal do notlie u/s 246A, if the
additions/disallowanceson facts areadmitted by theassessee beforethe AO. (unless theappellant candemonstrate thatfacts relied uponwere untrue andcircumstances forplacing suchreliance) , as the
assessee cannot besaid to be ‘aggrieved’ by theasst. ordercontaining suchagreedadditions/disallowances.However, thewrongadmission/acquaintanceby Assessee onstatutoryprovisions, lawpoints are notbinding.
Page 1 of 7Appeal & Revision
05/11/2011http://wirc-icai.org/wirc_referencer/Income%20Tax%20&%20Wealth%20Tax/Appea...
8/3/2019 Wirc-icai.org Wirc Referencer Income Tax Wealth%
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wirc-icaiorg-wirc-referencer-income-tax-wealth 2/7
assessedtotalincome ismore thanRs. 2 lakhs.
4) The Assesseemust ensurepayment of tax dueas per income ‘returned’ by himu/s 249(4) if notpaid at the time of filing of return of income. 5) No power of CIT(A) to set aside theAssessmentOrder/penaltyorder of AO.
248 CIT(A) Same asabove
Filing Fee250/-
Form35
Same asabove to theextent
applicable.
1) Where under anagreement or otherarrangement, the
tax is deductible onany income [otherthan interest]under S.195 is tobe borne by theperson by whomthe income ispayable and suchperson having paidsuch tax claimsthat no tax wasrequired to bededucted on suchincome, he mayappeal to the CIT(A) for adeclaration that notax was deductibleon such income. 2) Where the tax isborne by thepayee, the payercannot file appealunder S.248 of the
Act. If the payeecontends for lowerrate of deductionor nil deduction, hehas to file thereturn of incomeand claim refundfrom the revenueauthorities.Alternatively, hemay invoke Writ jurisdiction of the
Competent HighCourt under Article226 of theConstitution owing
Page 2 of 7Appeal & Revision
05/11/2011http://wirc-icai.org/wirc_referencer/Income%20Tax%20&%20Wealth%20Tax/Appea...
8/3/2019 Wirc-icai.org Wirc Referencer Income Tax Wealth%
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wirc-icaiorg-wirc-referencer-income-tax-wealth 3/7
to absence of effeciousalternative remedy.
3) Tax has to bepaid before filingappeal u/s 248unlike S. 246A. 4) CIT(A) in appealu/s 248 holdingassessee not liableto deduct tax atsource u/s 195,assessee is entitledto refund of theamount depositedby way of TDS.[TELCO vs. DCIT(2004) 83 TTJ 458
(Mum.)] 5) Appeal to besigned by theperson responsiblefor payment of income from whichTDS is deductibleu/s 195.
253 ITAT 60 daysfrom thedate of
service of CIT(A)orderSec.253(3) S.253(5)empowersthe ITATtocondonethe delayonshowingsufficientgrounds.
Appealfees: a) Rs.500. 1) whereassessedtotalincome isRs.1 lakhor less.2) Whereappeals arefiled onissues suchas TDS
defaults,penalties,non-filingof returns,etc. whichcannot belinked withtheassessedincome.3) Anapplication
for stay of demand. b)
36 1. Form No.36 togetherwith Grounds
of appeal intriplicate.
2. Orderappealedagainst-2copies(includingone certifiedcopy) 3. Order of AO 2 copies. 4. Grounds of Appeal beforeCIT(A)-2copies. 5. Statementof facts filedbefore CIT(A)-2 copies. 6. In the caseof appeal
againstpenaltyorder-2copies of
1. Personauthorised to signreturn of income
u/s. 140, must signappeal form. 2. Orders of CIT(A)/CIT againstwhich appeal liesare listed under therelevant section. 3. If the assessedincome is a lossthen fees has to becalculated as if that
loss is income.
Page 3 of 7Appeal & Revision
05/11/2011http://wirc-icai.org/wirc_referencer/Income%20Tax%20&%20Wealth%20Tax/Appea...
8/3/2019 Wirc-icai.org Wirc Referencer Income Tax Wealth%
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wirc-icaiorg-wirc-referencer-income-tax-wealth 4/7
REVISION
Rs.1,500, if assessedincome isabove Rs.1lakh butnot morethan Rs. 2
lakhs. c) 1% of assessedincomesubject tomaximumof Rs.10,000whereassessedincome ismore than
Rs. 2 lakhs.
relevantAssessmentorder. 7. In the caseof appealagainst orderu/s. 143(3)read withS.144A-2copies of thedirections of the JointCommissioneru/s. 144A 8. In the caseof appealagainst orderu/s. 143 read
with S. 147-2copies of original ass-essmentorder, if any.9. Proof of payment of appeal filingfee.10. Affidavitstatingreasons for
delay in filingappealbeyond 60days indelayed filing.
253(4) ITAT(Crossobjec-tion)
30 daysof receiptof noticeof appealby otherparty
NIL 36A Same asabove(exceptinstead of Form 36,Form 36A)
The Assessee/A.O.(who may or maynot have filledappeal) may filethe crossobjections againstany part of CIT(A)
order. No feespayable.
Section Subjectmatter
of revision
revise
Who
can Time limit Remarks
263 Any orderpassed by the
CIT 2 years from the end of thefinancial year in which order
1. CIT mustdisclose
Page 4 of 7Appeal & Revision
05/11/2011http://wirc-icai.org/wirc_referencer/Income%20Tax%20&%20Wealth%20Tax/Appea...
8/3/2019 Wirc-icai.org Wirc Referencer Income Tax Wealth%
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wirc-icaiorg-wirc-referencer-income-tax-wealth 5/7
AssessingOfficer which iserroneous andprejudicial tothe interest of the revenue
sought to be revised waspassed except in situationenumerated u/s 263(3).
reasons/grounds inhis notice toassessee forproposed revision.He shall givereasonableopportunity of
being heard toAssessee before anorder u/s 263passed. 2. CIT has thepower to call forand examine therecord of anyproceeding underthe Act. 3. The Assessment
Order must be ‘erroneous’ as wellas ‘prejudicial tothe interest of revenue’ before theaction can be takenunder this section. 4. The CIT has jurisdiction andpower to initiateproceedings under
S. 263 in respect of all issues nottouched by the CIT(A) in the appellateorder. 5. The expression ‘erroneous’ and ‘prejudicial to theinterest of revenue’ granting jurisdiction to CIThave been subject
matter of ragingcontroversies. 6. An appealagainst the orderof CIT u/s 263 liesin ITAT u/s 253.
264 Any orderpassed by theofficersubordinate to
CIT Exception:
1. Applies to anorder other
CIT a) If CIT revises on hismotion-1 year b) If assessee makes anapplication-1 year from dateof communication/knowledgeof the order (CIT has powerto condone delay), order to
1. The provisioncan be beneficiallyused by theAssessee for
seekingappropriate relief from CIT wherecertain claims,
Page 5 of 7Appeal & Revision
05/11/2011http://wirc-icai.org/wirc_referencer/Income%20Tax%20&%20Wealth%20Tax/Appea...
8/3/2019 Wirc-icai.org Wirc Referencer Income Tax Wealth%
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wirc-icaiorg-wirc-referencer-income-tax-wealth 6/7
RECTIFICATION
than an orderto which S. 263applies. 2. Whereappeal liesbefore CIT (A) /
ITAT or thetime limit forfiling the appealhas notexpired.
be passed within one yearfrom the end of the F.Y inwhich application is made.
relief could not beclaimed before theAO or appeal couldnot be filed beforeCIT(A) in time forany reason.
2. Application bythe Assessee to beaccompanied by afee of Rs.500. 3. An order cannotbe said to havebeen made subjectto an (effective)appeal if the appealhas been disposedof by CIT(A) orITAT without
passing an orderon merits.
4. S. 264 isenacted for thebenefit of theAssessee. Orderu/s 264 can not beprejudicial toAssessee. 5. The order of CITu/s 264 is notappealable beforeITAT u/s 253 orHigh Court u/s260A. However, apetition for Writ of Certiorari underArticle 226 of theConstitution forquashing the orderof CIT will lie inappropriate cases.
Section Subjectmatter of
rectification
Who canrectify
Timelimit What can
berectified
Remarks
154 (a) Any orderpassed by anIT authority
under theprovisions of IT Act.
The Co-ordinate orsuperior IT
authoritypassing theoriginalorder
4 yearsfrom theend of the
financialyear inwhichorder was
Anymistake ‘apparent’
from therecord.
1. Debatable/controversialissues cannot be rectifiedu/s 154.
2. An appeal lies againstrectification orders. 3. An appeal lies against
Page 6 of 7Appeal & Revision
05/11/2011http://wirc-icai.org/wirc_referencer/Income%20Tax%20&%20Wealth%20Tax/Appea...
8/3/2019 Wirc-icai.org Wirc Referencer Income Tax Wealth%
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wirc-icaiorg-wirc-referencer-income-tax-wealth 7/7
(b) Intimationor deemedintimationu/s. 143(1)
passed. refusal to rectify themistake. 4. Rectification orderhaving effect of enhancingliability or reducing refundcould be passed only after
opportunity of hearing tothe assessee. 5. Rectification Applicationshall be disposed of withinsix months from the endof the month in which theapplication is made.
254(2) Any orderpassed byITAT
ITAT 4 yearsfrom the
date of theorder.
-do- 1. Filing Fee – Rs. 50 / - 2. Meaning of expression ‘mistake apparent’ highly
controversial in the wakeof divergent judicialpronouncements. 3. Failure to considermaterial on record ororder of ITAT, based onerroneous assumption of facts, non consideration of grounds, failure toconsider alternategrounds, nonconsideration of relevantprovisions of law/ rule/binding decisions inter aliaare some of the groundsfor rectification.
4. The ITAT cannot ‘review’ its order passedon merits in the garb of ‘rectification’ by resortingto S. 254(2).
Page 7 of 7Appeal & Revision